Test drove this (premium, AWD, extended) along with an Equinox EV (RS FWD) and a Blazer EV (RS RWD) this weekend; my wife drives a 2022 Bolt EUV (LT, FWD, 36k miles currently) and with all the available incentives it makes some sense to "upgrade" now even though it isn't necessary. The Mach E blew me away and was my clear winner between the 3 we drove. Responsive, comfortable, and the build quality seemed amazing. Possibly the most comfortable seat I've sat in before; the light bolstering was still contouring enough that my plus-size self was immensely comfortable (almost never the case with any bolstering for me). Really the biggest omission, to me, is no ventilated seats. Wife is leaning Mach E right now, but still considering the Blazer as well. If you live somewhere with 0 concern about weather, the RWD extended range seems like an absolutely amazing EV choice. Here in the Cleveland area, the AWD extended range feels like a perfect choice.
@@leok7193 I believe 2022 was the most recent model year Tesla I've sat in. I've heard it's gotten somewhat better, but is still very spotty overall. The Mach E build quality was honestly fantastic, and the Blazer EV looked and felt very good overall. The Equinox wasn't bad, but it didn't stand out when it came to noticeable build quality and fit & finish. While they might be slow to the EV game, the legacy automakers definitely know how to run a quality assembly line (when they want to).
The standard range battery (71kWh) is now LFP, which is another significant change hardware-wise. It raises the question for customers: get the LFP with 230 miles range that you can charge to 100% regularly, or pay $5k for the 300 mile extended range non-LFP that should only be charged to 80% on a regular basis? 80% of 300 miles is 240 miles, so not that much different. In daily use, I see little difference between them and an opportunity to save $5k, but that extra 70 miles of range could come in handy once in a while. Hard to know if you’ve never had an EV before, but it’s not like you can upgrade the battery later!
That 80% "on a regular basis" is for dcfc. Most people are only fast charging on road trips. You can level 2 to 100% at home to your heart's content. Plus, if you're dcfc any battery type, beyond 80% the charging time is very slow, so you wouldn't do much of that anyways if you want to get to your destination. Therefore, I'd rather have 80% of the long range vs 80% of the short range.
@@jeffs6090 Hmm, I think the 80% limit for non-LFP batteries is for any kind of charging. I could not find any reference to refute the 80% charge limitation for Level 1/2 charging. If you know of info, please reference it, as I'd like to read it.
Guess it depends on where you are. In Wisconsin, I’ve used the cooled seats in our Explorer about 3 times in 9 years. Not worth paying extra for, but I’d likely feel different in the southwest heat zones.
Had '22 Model 3. Have '23 Lightning. I think legacy automakers have comparable hardware. However, I can't overstate how much better tesla software is for long trips. With tesla you just get in and go. With my Ford I spend 30 minutes to an hour the night before planning my stops on ABRP. This is a huge negative IMP.
None of the trip planners are bulletproof, not even Tesla, so it still requires the driver to have a head on their shoulders and be aware of where they’re going and how to get there.
@jeffs6090 No no really. It is awesome that I get to charge at a Tesla supercharger station that is a game changer for me. The part that is not changed is the trip planning software in the cars. With a Tesla, you put your location in and it will navigate to that location and plot where you're going to stop for how long and what you need to charge it to. You can't do that on the Ford navigation. The navigation may have charging stops but it's unreliable. Ford navigation doesn't tell you what your battery percentage will be when you arrive at your destination. It's like an afterthought. With Tesla the trip planning is just built in and is infinitely easier.
We are looking at purchasing a Tesla Model Y LR and are comparing that option to the Mustang Mach E Premium with AWD. We also looked at the Honda Prologue and Blazer EV and walked away from those not impressed. To start with the price of the Mach E is $8,000 more than the Tesla, even if you include the tax rebate that both qualify for. The 0-60 are the same, actually the car magazines show the Tesla is a few tenths faster, the Model Y charges faster and very importantly for us has even better range. I've driven both, and both drive nice, but I like the seats in the Model Y more, they were just more comfortable and the Model Y didn't have so much in the way of hard plastics. I think the Tesla infotainment system is light years better than Ford Sync and the stereo sounds way better. I really liked the Tesla mapping software and how it did such a great job showing your your route and charging stops. Tesla also includes dual wireless chargers, why didn't Ford include dual wireless chargers? The space is there in the center console for charging a second phone. I also really like the all glass roof in the Model Y, the MachE just felt much more claustrophobic. The Model Y also has heated rear seats that the Ford didn't have, even though the price is much more. We will probably just wait for the new Tesla Model Y to come out with next year which should also include ventilated front seats and even more range. Also, I see the Tesla lease offer is currently better that way was just quoted, it's $25 more per month than he said but the money down is only $3,000 not $5,000.
I’d like to see you start adding clips of other options you speak of instead of leaving it up to our imagination. You mentioned a grill on another model and different interiors. Also, it would be good to see clips of other vehicles that you compare vehicles to
Because of the massive depreciation of all electric vehicles, if you are interested in owning one, never buy one; always lease one. For the skinny tires that were chosen to enhance range, I am not impressed by the range at all. I'm not sure why Ford is just releasing this refresh as a 2024 model when other manufacturers are now releasing their 2025 models.
This video was shot in Sep 2024. Ford announced that 2025s will be coming in early 2025 and will have some upgrades, including ventilated seats and a heat pump.
You can basically do range * .8 or .85 and that is the range it will have in a handful of years. Then during a road trip you'll not run that out completely. So keep that in mind when you consider an EV.
Tesla NACS adapter is NOT shipped with this vehicle. It’s a $200 accessory and not currently available. Correction, there is no automatic parallel parking despite having a button on the console.
To make it worse, the European spec Mach-E has a tow hitch. Many people have added tow hitches using the mounting points that are already there. Ford should make it an option, at least a small one for a bike mount.
@@rusticroads tow capacity ratings are different here and it's weird. Almost like it has to be idiot proof. I've done something similar to our Honda Crosstour. Basically installed a "tow package" and it easily handles a 3500 pound camper. I feel like it's to get people to buy big crossovers and trucks.
@@mtnman1984I think the modern US standards are vastly more strict than they used to be. Every flimsy, 150hp SUV in the early 1990s was rated at 5000 lb. The brakes were weak compared to today. By that standard, most 2000 lb rated vehicles today can tow 5000 lb without a problem, as long as they have a trans cooler.
@@777jones that and a brake controller. My Crosstour has a trans cooler, brake upgrade, 7-pin brake controller, rear air bags, heavy duty rear suspension links, tires spec'd for a Honda Pilot, and a Class 3 hitch with additional reinforcement. Comfortably towed an 18' camper. The Crosstour has the rear subframe and suspension from a CR-V, which can tow 1600 kilos in most foreign markets. With the upgrades I have done, it's overbuilt for what I tow. I think stateside regs were geared towards driving dynamics, but there's nothing dynamic about those monster fifth wheels that weigh more than the trucks pulling them. I think it's incredible that the big three can get the kinds of capacities they have without duallys.
This is a great car to buy used right now. You can get some with 40,000 miles under $28,000 and you can then get the used ev credit. I definitely would not buy these brand new unless you like to spend money.
Confirmed! The usual popular sites have quite a few. Surprisingly, new ones have some good discounts. I think the relatively low range is why. Compared to Tesla, 200 mile range is pretty low and with the price cut, the Tesla is a pretty good deal.
@DennisWisniewski-py3lr I'm asking. I don't know what PA winters entail but if it's -40c (I think it's -40F) then it's happened to me several times where the doors freeze shut. Granted it wasn't on this car it was on another model.
One of my bestest buddies has a Mach E GT...I really like it. 3 things that would prevent me from owning one myself. The ride height is low more sedan than SUV, as well as a little harsh in some circumstances very Ford like. Last the price is 70K +. I am greatful for choices though!
Average cargo space, 10-80% in 30+ minutes, 71 kW usable battery capacity, about 230 miles of range (probably less) AND $55,000? And no door handles. Mannnnn… this car makes no sense. If you want to beat Tesla, do everything to beat them.
@@craigrn16 still not a lot of range. But then again, most people get the standard for daily driving, not for long trips. Both Tesla and MME get over 300 miles with the LR.
A yooper from northern Michigan here. Yous guys have to take a road trip with one of your fancy electric cars nort of the Big Mac to a camp up here in the dead of winter and see how this thing preforms. Better bring your mudders and choppers with ya cus your going to need them, don’t cha know. Love your reviews!
*"competent"* and presumably well supported as have a Dealership Network backing up this purchase but definitely not a pony car with that as the top end and given what Tesla has *ALWAYS* been doing since day one. Surprisingly weak on the range figures i agree with those comments as well. Verdict: first time buyers can't get enough of this offer😊😊
2025 Mach E will finally get a heat pump. Mach E really just a version 1 mod 0 EV without heat pump. GM Ultium platform has heat pump as standard equipment.
I really like the Mustang Mach e, the standard range is good for my driving needs, this issue is that the 2025 model will have the heat pump and ventilated seats, I live in a very hot climate in the summer. That’s huge, I think I will wait for the 2025.
The navigation system in the Mustang is very second rate. Several times it directed me off major route onto second or third rate roads. Then back to the major route. The mileage scale is to small for major highway planing. You can change the scale BUT with out notice it reverts back to the small scale. Very confusing as you are driving. Much harder to plan you route as you drive. if you are sitting and planing your route. the maps is very detailed. But again very small view. So you squeeze the mailer scale to see a larger area map. All the detail and names disappear.
230 mile range is very low compared to their competitors who offer 320 or more miles of range. And hard touch plastic on the dashboard is unsatisfactory for the price they’re asking for.
Thanks for mentioning where the vehicle is made. All of these US companies producing their EV's south of the border won't earn a look from me. It's really a shame. A BYD model can be made for 15K or less following NAFTA guidelines and our dictatorship blocks it to protect the American auto worker which is a lie. If I'm going to drop 40-60K on an EV, it better be made in the US with US labor. Long livey Bolt...
The small battery is a joke. If you own the car you’ll want to limit battery SOC to 20-80%. That drops the range to 150 miles in summer and about 112 in winter.
I like the looks of it. I don’t like the name, the seating position and the tech. So I decided to buy a Model Y two years ago. Looks like the new model is a bit better.
@ and the one that takes the biggest deprecation hit with poor fit and finish to this date. It’s easy to have big numbers when you were the only house on the block…. Those days are long over
Premium? Lol. Neither this or anything Tesla makes are premium. They may carry a premium price tag but they are anything but premium. Just cheap feeling, poorly assembled junk.
@ Weird, because I have been in a work associate’s Mach E GT Performance and another associate’s Model Y Performance. They both are godawful inside, just a lot of poorly assembled plastic. But you know me better than I know myself, random internet person. 🙄
Wow 55k without Tax and no Vented seats. Laughable. That stuck on tablet also looks horrible. My 2022 Kia EV6 shits all over this thing, has vented seats and cost 10k less. Same 0-60 time.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Test drove this (premium, AWD, extended) along with an Equinox EV (RS FWD) and a Blazer EV (RS RWD) this weekend; my wife drives a 2022 Bolt EUV (LT, FWD, 36k miles currently) and with all the available incentives it makes some sense to "upgrade" now even though it isn't necessary.
The Mach E blew me away and was my clear winner between the 3 we drove. Responsive, comfortable, and the build quality seemed amazing. Possibly the most comfortable seat I've sat in before; the light bolstering was still contouring enough that my plus-size self was immensely comfortable (almost never the case with any bolstering for me). Really the biggest omission, to me, is no ventilated seats.
Wife is leaning Mach E right now, but still considering the Blazer as well. If you live somewhere with 0 concern about weather, the RWD extended range seems like an absolutely amazing EV choice. Here in the Cleveland area, the AWD extended range feels like a perfect choice.
@@TheQuixotic1 are you avoiding Tesla on purpose? If you're shopping EV, it's at least worth a test drive
@leok7193 I've sat in 3 different Teslas and they all had some of the worst build quality and fit & finish I've ever seen. Very unimpressive.
@@TheQuixotic1 odd, were these recent? I heard the reputation, but when I test drove a new model 3, I looked around and didn't find any issues
@@leok7193 I believe 2022 was the most recent model year Tesla I've sat in. I've heard it's gotten somewhat better, but is still very spotty overall.
The Mach E build quality was honestly fantastic, and the Blazer EV looked and felt very good overall. The Equinox wasn't bad, but it didn't stand out when it came to noticeable build quality and fit & finish. While they might be slow to the EV game, the legacy automakers definitely know how to run a quality assembly line (when they want to).
Go test drive the Nissan Ariya
It's over 500 lbs *lighter* than the new M5.
In what world would you ever compare, let alone cross shop those cars?
No one cares about that comparison. M5s are junk now anyways.
😂😂 the M5 is a full blown apt building in weight now.
😂
I'm here for the "solid thunk"
I’m here for his alien sunglasses!
🍆
It gives the impression of quality.
@ it is quality compared to Tesla..
230 miles of range for 54k? 😒😒
230 in warm weather.
Yep...the deal killer for me.
Some people are getting these with charger and install included with 0% interest. Plus they are fantastic to drive, pretty good deal
I just went to build one and it said 300 miles for $54'000 and free home charger
@@yankeesusa1better fit and finish then any Tesla EVER
The standard range battery (71kWh) is now LFP, which is another significant change hardware-wise. It raises the question for customers: get the LFP with 230 miles range that you can charge to 100% regularly, or pay $5k for the 300 mile extended range non-LFP that should only be charged to 80% on a regular basis?
80% of 300 miles is 240 miles, so not that much different. In daily use, I see little difference between them and an opportunity to save $5k, but that extra 70 miles of range could come in handy once in a while. Hard to know if you’ve never had an EV before, but it’s not like you can upgrade the battery later!
That 80% "on a regular basis" is for dcfc. Most people are only fast charging on road trips. You can level 2 to 100% at home to your heart's content.
Plus, if you're dcfc any battery type, beyond 80% the charging time is very slow, so you wouldn't do much of that anyways if you want to get to your destination. Therefore, I'd rather have 80% of the long range vs 80% of the short range.
@@jeffs6090 Hmm, I think the 80% limit for non-LFP batteries is for any kind of charging. I could not find any reference to refute the 80% charge limitation for Level 1/2 charging. If you know of info, please reference it, as I'd like to read it.
The 2025 comes with a heat pump finally
And ventilated seats!!
After experiencing AC/vented seats, I don't think I could ever go back. Good review.
Guess it depends on where you are. In Wisconsin, I’ve used the cooled seats in our Explorer about 3 times in 9 years. Not worth paying extra for, but I’d likely feel different in the southwest heat zones.
Added for 2025.
Absolutely amazing review. I have never found as thorough a review. I appreciate your effort and skills!
Had '22 Model 3. Have '23 Lightning. I think legacy automakers have comparable hardware. However, I can't overstate how much better tesla software is for long trips. With tesla you just get in and go. With my Ford I spend 30 minutes to an hour the night before planning my stops on ABRP. This is a huge negative IMP.
None of the trip planners are bulletproof, not even Tesla, so it still requires the driver to have a head on their shoulders and be aware of where they’re going and how to get there.
@rusticroads maybe but with my Tesla I never once had to think about charging on a trip it was as easy as driving with an ICE car.
@@daveromanyshyn1170This being able to charge on the SC network now makes that argument moot
@jeffs6090 No no really. It is awesome that I get to charge at a Tesla supercharger station that is a game changer for me. The part that is not changed is the trip planning software in the cars. With a Tesla, you put your location in and it will navigate to that location and plot where you're going to stop for how long and what you need to charge it to. You can't do that on the Ford navigation. The navigation may have charging stops but it's unreliable. Ford navigation doesn't tell you what your battery percentage will be when you arrive at your destination. It's like an afterthought. With Tesla the trip planning is just built in and is infinitely easier.
Yea sure it was😂
We are looking at purchasing a Tesla Model Y LR and are comparing that option to the Mustang Mach E Premium with AWD. We also looked at the Honda Prologue and Blazer EV and walked away from those not impressed. To start with the price of the Mach E is $8,000 more than the Tesla, even if you include the tax rebate that both qualify for. The 0-60 are the same, actually the car magazines show the Tesla is a few tenths faster, the Model Y charges faster and very importantly for us has even better range. I've driven both, and both drive nice, but I like the seats in the Model Y more, they were just more comfortable and the Model Y didn't have so much in the way of hard plastics. I think the Tesla infotainment system is light years better than Ford Sync and the stereo sounds way better. I really liked the Tesla mapping software and how it did such a great job showing your your route and charging stops. Tesla also includes dual wireless chargers, why didn't Ford include dual wireless chargers? The space is there in the center console for charging a second phone. I also really like the all glass roof in the Model Y, the MachE just felt much more claustrophobic. The Model Y also has heated rear seats that the Ford didn't have, even though the price is much more. We will probably just wait for the new Tesla Model Y to come out with next year which should also include ventilated front seats and even more range. Also, I see the Tesla lease offer is currently better that way was just quoted, it's $25 more per month than he said but the money down is only $3,000 not $5,000.
Thanks for adding the leasing information at the end 👍
The Mach E is the most interesting electric car I don’t want to own
Does not matter. Yer nothing but a low down tire kicker.
I’d like to see you start adding clips of other options you speak of instead of leaving it up to our imagination. You mentioned a grill on another model and different interiors. Also, it would be good to see clips of other vehicles that you compare vehicles to
Make your own car channel with over a million subscribers and then get back to us
Because of the massive depreciation of all electric vehicles, if you are interested in owning one, never buy one; always lease one. For the skinny tires that were chosen to enhance range, I am not impressed by the range at all. I'm not sure why Ford is just releasing this refresh as a 2024 model when other manufacturers are now releasing their 2025 models.
This video was shot in Sep 2024. Ford announced that 2025s will be coming in early 2025 and will have some upgrades, including ventilated seats and a heat pump.
You can basically do range * .8 or .85 and that is the range it will have in a handful of years. Then during a road trip you'll not run that out completely. So keep that in mind when you consider an EV.
Drove a friends and absolutely loved it! On my radar for my next vehicle.
Tesla NACS adapter is NOT shipped with this vehicle. It’s a $200 accessory and not currently available.
Correction, there is no automatic parallel parking despite having a button on the console.
230 mile range is a joke. And that's being conservative. More like 200, even worse with winter around the corner.
Pulse factor in 50% instant depreciation and it's a Ford this thing is worthless. Just buy a used Tesla if u want an EV it's the best value
That’s why you go for the bigger battery pack
It’s not the extended range battery
@@shanewilfon6860or buy one of these used for better fit and finish
Tesla is garbage how many recalls have there been? @shanewilfon6860
It’s November 2024, they don’t have a 2025?
The 2025 Mustang Mach-E goes on sale in early 2025, starting at a manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) of $36,495.
From reading fourms, I think you can order from a dealership now but not online yet
The complete lack of towing seems like quite the oversight considering most midsize ICE crossovers come with 2000+ lbs of towing.
To make it worse, the European spec Mach-E has a tow hitch. Many people have added tow hitches using the mounting points that are already there. Ford should make it an option, at least a small one for a bike mount.
@@rusticroads tow capacity ratings are different here and it's weird. Almost like it has to be idiot proof. I've done something similar to our Honda Crosstour. Basically installed a "tow package" and it easily handles a 3500 pound camper. I feel like it's to get people to buy big crossovers and trucks.
@@mtnman1984I think the modern US standards are vastly more strict than they used to be. Every flimsy, 150hp SUV in the early 1990s was rated at 5000 lb. The brakes were weak compared to today. By that standard, most 2000 lb rated vehicles today can tow 5000 lb without a problem, as long as they have a trans cooler.
@@777jones that and a brake controller. My Crosstour has a trans cooler, brake upgrade, 7-pin brake controller, rear air bags, heavy duty rear suspension links, tires spec'd for a Honda Pilot, and a Class 3 hitch with additional reinforcement. Comfortably towed an 18' camper. The Crosstour has the rear subframe and suspension from a CR-V, which can tow 1600 kilos in most foreign markets. With the upgrades I have done, it's overbuilt for what I tow. I think stateside regs were geared towards driving dynamics, but there's nothing dynamic about those monster fifth wheels that weigh more than the trucks pulling them. I think it's incredible that the big three can get the kinds of capacities they have without duallys.
Weirdly, I never see Mach E drivers utilizing the low zero to sixty ability.
LOL yeah this thing is not great but people who drive it love it from what I've seen when riding Ubers and have a relative who has one
@@williamconrad1087 public streets aren’t for racing
Because people who buy these aren’t driving like dumb asses like people who buy teslas.
@@SimonGonzalOSNothing is great. Every vehicle has issues. Just look at Tesla, yeah they’re quick but everything else. 🤢🤮
@@ZACH_95_ Tesla's never seemed great outside of the model x
This is a great car to buy used right now. You can get some with 40,000 miles under $28,000 and you can then get the used ev credit. I definitely would not buy these brand new unless you like to spend money.
I like to spend money, fella.
Confirmed! The usual popular sites have quite a few. Surprisingly, new ones have some good discounts. I think the relatively low range is why. Compared to Tesla, 200 mile range is pretty low and with the price cut, the Tesla is a pretty good deal.
No ventilated seats is craziness
2025s have it
@@theflapjackaviation2645and a heat pump
My 2022 Bolt EUV has ventilated seats, panoramic sunroof, and 360° camera.
@ that’s nice.. buy a 2025 and you’ll have most of that along with a heat pump.
@@Juako0217all packaged in one of the least appealing cars ever made
These are all great improvements, especially the extra power; however, 230 miles of range is totally unacceptable for a modern EV.
those doors....how is it during cold weather when door tend to freeze?
Easy to open without issue
Who told you the doors freeze. Never happened to me in four PA winters.
@DennisWisniewski-py3lr I'm asking. I don't know what PA winters entail but if it's -40c (I think it's -40F) then it's happened to me several times where the doors freeze shut. Granted it wasn't on this car it was on another model.
@@matthewchau2481 does happen in NE Ohio. Got down to 20 below a few times and doors opened without issue
One of my bestest buddies has a Mach E GT...I really like it. 3 things that would prevent me from owning one myself. The ride height is low more sedan than SUV, as well as a little harsh in some circumstances very Ford like. Last the price is 70K +. I am greatful for choices though!
buy second hand, price is like half
and battery life will be half too.
These specs would've been outstanding in 2020. I hope Farley and his team learned a few things from that SU7 he's been driving.
I want the interiors to change with more colors and new tech
HUD available?
Im still partial to the Korean EV offerings over Tesla and Ford's offerings.
Big mistake, not your first
@gerry9306 Yeah, how dare I enjoy a product that actually had proper R&D via a legacy manufacturer!
Do you own a Tesla?
@@Outcastiid I'm Toyota hybrid all day, all night. No K-Pop for me, pal.
@gerry9306 Unfortunate, as Toyota's new powerplants haven't lived up to expectations reliability-wise. That, and they're dreadfully boring.
@Outcastiid no problems for me, and I'm not bored either. Toyo/Lexus 👍. K-Pop bahaha 🤣
Nice video & this is my right EV for me to buy.
Good review. I like the vapor blue color.
The charging network is very second rate compared to Tesla's. I have been waiting over 11 months for my FREE Adapter.
230 range, 4.5 seconds 0-60, 114 mph top speed and knocking on $55k's door. Way too expensive for what you get.
$1500 more gets you 300mi...how about you listen next time. Personally 230mi is enough for me and its 400lbs lighter.
6:10 The 150kW DC charging speed is literally Tesla specs from 2017, and still has CCS2 adapters, despite NACS being standardized now.
Average cargo space, 10-80% in 30+ minutes, 71 kW usable battery capacity, about 230 miles of range (probably less) AND $55,000?
And no door handles.
Mannnnn… this car makes no sense. If you want to beat Tesla, do everything to beat them.
love the looks and all but when comparing to a MY from a specs standpoint why would you pick this over a rival especially a MY AWD
230 miles for a 72 KW battery? That seems really low for a battery that size
Isn't tesla standard range 240 miles?😊
@ yeah. For a 58 KW battery
@@craigrn16 still not a lot of range. But then again, most people get the standard for daily driving, not for long trips. Both Tesla and MME get over 300 miles with the LR.
I really want a 2025, but not sure how pricing is going to change with potential tarriffs.
The 2025 Mustang Mach-E goes on sale in early 2025, starting at a manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) of $36,495.
@Cory69 the question is, will they keep the incentives for free chargers and installation. Think they are doing 0 apr right now as well.
A yooper from northern Michigan here. Yous guys have to take a road trip with one of your fancy electric cars nort of the Big Mac to a camp up here in the dead of winter and see how this thing preforms. Better bring your mudders and choppers with ya cus your going to need them, don’t cha know. Love your reviews!
*"competent"* and presumably well supported as have a Dealership Network backing up this purchase but definitely not a pony car with that as the top end and given what Tesla has *ALWAYS* been doing since day one. Surprisingly weak on the range figures i agree with those comments as well. Verdict: first time buyers can't get enough of this offer😊😊
Love your car video
This review is almost a year late 😂😂😂
2025 Mach E will finally get a heat pump. Mach E really just a version 1 mod 0 EV without heat pump. GM Ultium platform has heat pump as standard equipment.
I really like the Mustang Mach e, the standard range is good for my driving needs, this issue is that the 2025 model will have the heat pump and ventilated seats, I live in a very hot climate in the summer. That’s huge, I think I will wait for the 2025.
Seems awful late for this review. The 2025 is the story with the price cuts, heat pump and cooled seats.
The navigation system in the Mustang is very second rate. Several times it directed me off major route onto second or third rate roads. Then back to the major route. The mileage scale is to small for major highway planing. You can change the scale BUT with out notice it reverts back to the small scale. Very confusing as you are driving. Much harder to plan you route as you drive. if you are sitting and planing your route. the maps is very detailed. But again very small view. So you squeeze the mailer scale to see a larger area map. All the detail and names disappear.
Bro said Mousse-Tache 😂
230 mile range is very low compared to their competitors who offer 320 or more miles of range. And hard touch plastic on the dashboard is unsatisfactory for the price they’re asking for.
230 is very standard for standard range. 320 miles is for EV with long range batteries and RWD. I swear y'all are bots
I thought the 230 mile range was a joke, I guess not!😂😂
Use your brain and get the long range😂
My money Skoda Enyaq coupe for the win.
Compared with Lincoln Nautilus
The nautilus is not an EV
@saranrathakrish8468 I Know Brother, The Mach E is Compact SUV
Thanks for mentioning where the vehicle is made. All of these US companies producing their EV's south of the border won't earn a look from me. It's really a shame. A BYD model can be made for 15K or less following NAFTA guidelines and our dictatorship blocks it to protect the American auto worker which is a lie. If I'm going to drop 40-60K on an EV, it better be made in the US with US labor. Long livey Bolt...
Pathetic range, cannot believe only 230 mile range, I'll take model y over this anytime
Isn't the Tesla Y standard only 240 miles?? Way to show them😂😂😂
I thought the mach e doesn't qualify for the 7500 tax credit? What's your source that says it does???
It does qualify. It’s on the Ford website duh.
@RONderluck your parents let you onto youtube? You must be under 18 to say duh.
On another note. No it doesn't show on ford website. It does show federal tax rebate for the lightning which i own and got. But not for the mach e.
@ It’s ok to be blind. No judgement.
@@freddyfresh2686It does. Verified. At least here in TN it does. Wouldn’t think it was state specific though
The small battery is a joke. If you own the car you’ll want to limit battery SOC to 20-80%. That drops the range to 150 miles in summer and about 112 in winter.
Uh no. At least google a bit before communicating wrong info. Ford says you can charge this one to 100% daily. Lfp…
I think they would sell better if Ford dropped the Mustang name and logos on this. Mach E is fine but it’s not a Mustang.
R.I.P. to the Ford "do do do"
Infotainment is laggy as always
Mine isn’t
Mustang Mach E no longer qualifies for Federal EV tax credit
This car is the meme
Ewww brother whats that brother
Is this eligible for the $7500 tax rebate?
Bruh, it's time to start rockin' the shaved head look.
I disagree
Obviously. Favourite word?
230 mile range. A true lol.
I like the looks of it. I don’t like the name, the seating position and the tech. So I decided to buy a Model Y two years ago. Looks like the new model is a bit better.
Put a Coyote in it and sell 10x more
That would have been nice. I would have even enjoyed an ecoboost version or a hybrid of the two over the full electric.
Just buy the Tesla.
FORD PLAIN DASHBOARD NO TRUNK FORD TAURUS WAS BETTER BRING BACK SEDANS AGAIN
I’d probably get a model y or ioniq5
Wait for the new Model Y Juniper👌👀
And still get poor for and finish and THE worst depreciation of all EVs.
Caveat- but you’ll LOVE IT…..especially the Performance version. There is a few reasons why it was the BEST SELLING CAR IN THE WORLD…💪
@ and the one that takes the biggest deprecation hit with poor fit and finish to this date. It’s easy to have big numbers when you were the only house on the block…. Those days are long over
We shall 👀
@@CupidinColorado the American public has already seen and experienced
Premium? Lol. Neither this or anything Tesla makes are premium. They may carry a premium price tag but they are anything but premium. Just cheap feeling, poorly assembled junk.
You haven't been in one of these, nor have you been in a Tesla. You're regurgitating something you've read online.
@ Weird, because I have been in a work associate’s Mach E GT Performance and another associate’s Model Y Performance. They both are godawful inside, just a lot of poorly assembled plastic. But you know me better than I know myself, random internet person. 🙄
@mattspeer01 You're exaggerating. Be objective. People will take you far more seriously.
My friend’s is very nice inside. Not sure what you’re smoking
Lol. It’s neither a Mustang or SUV.
But why is it shaped so ugly. Make a sedan like version
Who the f would buy this.zero resale
THIS CAR IS TWO SMALL NO TRUNK BRING BACK SEDANS AGAIN TAURUS OR FUSION OR IMPALA OR BUICK SEDANS REGAL
Wow 55k without Tax and no Vented seats. Laughable. That stuck on tablet also looks horrible. My 2022 Kia EV6 shits all over this thing, has vented seats and cost 10k less. Same 0-60 time.
Well personally, I find it laughable that you drive a Kia. But that's just me.
@TB-um1xz and I find it laughable you defend this monstrosity. A "mustang" no less 🤣 Thanks for the laugh
@@Elite199 show me where I was defending? I was making a comment about your car. Thanks for the laugh.
@@TB-um1xz thanks man! Any attention is attention after all. I'll take it ❤️
@@Elite199 you ain't getting any attention in that Kia 🤣🤣🤣
What a pretty rental car………💩
Yer ma's a pretty rental too
….extra cost if he wears his shorts. 😍
...hol' up.
Ahh, the era of the ugly mustang. 😝
it is embarrassing to call this a Mustang
Not if you actually understand why they did it.
Get over it. Its a mach E. Better than any mustang
Get over it already. Its so done at this point.
Must be a Mustang owner that had his doors blown off by a mach-e. Ha
Who cares what it's called, the problem still is range and price.
garbage
That color is horrible.
😂 wow it's like they stick an ipad on as an infotainment, dam is ugly and weird looking
And teslas isn’t??