WHY DOES THE MAJORITY OF WHITE MAINSTREAM MEDIA CONTINUE TO PRETEND HOW O.J. KILLED THESE PEOPLE WITHOUT A SCRATCH ON HIS BODY & WAS ABLE TO GET TO LAX AIRPORT WITHIN 25 MINUTES TO CATCH HIS FLIGHT FROM BRENTWOOD. MENTAL ILLNES IS A BIG MONEY CASH COW IN THIS COUNTRY. THE ONLY PEOPLE O.J KILLED WAS IN THE MOVIE " THE KLANSMAN" W/ RICHARD BURTON , & LEE MARVIN
The only reason the media has such a big heart in this case is cuz he dropped a J and got away with it. But Js dropped Jesus and got away with it, so what's the big deal?
You left a big part out, he’s not only wearing the gloves on that broadcast but he’s wearing the Bruno Magli shoes he wore when he committed the murders as well
Also don’t forget the $4,300 Bruno Mali black leather & suede shoes he was wearing at the time of the murders. Only around 300 were ever sold in the US and OJ was seen on TV during a live Monday Night Football broadcast in late 1992 (less than a year before the killings) wearing the same shoes. Unfortunately the prosecution team fumbled it completely and didn’t find that MNF clip of him with the shoes until after the verdict. OJ testified under oath that “I would never wear shoes like that they are ugly as hell.” Of course, he wore them on national TV no one had the due diligence to look. I honestly can’t believe Marsha Clark had the nerve to write those books and then take a job as a lead legal analyst with CNN. She messed that up so badly along with Darden. Had they gotten their hands on that clip the jury would have had a much harder time explaining the shoes away than the stupid gloves
Read "OUTRAGE" bu Melvin Bellìnga. Both sides screwed up, but Marcia Clark was the worst. She hired a jury selection expert to help select jurors, at $3,500 per day. The expert quit after the third day after Clark refused to listen to her. Clark wanted to pack the jury with black women! The defense was elated.
"OJs resting easy now knowing his wife's killer is dead." Random dude in bar the morning after he died. Edit added random dude in bar because there's a special club of weirdos who cant take a joke.
The leather gloves were covered in wet blood when it dried the leather shrunk, plus he stopped his arthritis meds, hands and joints swelled. He had rubber gloves underneath the leather gloves. If you watch him trying the gloves on, he spread his fingers out, making his hands wider. No wondered they didn't "fit"
The left glove was found outside browns home and the right was found at simpson’s estate. there was also no other suspects besides simpson. brown bought simpson the exact same gloves as a gift. it’s impossible they’re anyone else’s gloves
Besides all of that, it's like they're saying that a dude would go to murder somebody and realize the gloves almost don't fit quite as snug as he'd like, then he just goes "DAMN, THWARTED!"
It's disgusting to this day they could test the inside of those gloves and come up with OJ Simpson's DNA because they were his gloves. Of course now that they've had him put them on even though he was wearing rubber gloves now any DNA that's in there from him they can discount because the prosecution had him put on those gloves
All you have to do is look at it logically. If you committed a murder and lost a glove whilst doing it. Knowing that you would be prime suspect would you drive home with the other glove on and put it in your cupboard? Then would you you get on a plane and fly to another city hoping that the Police wouldn't find the right hand glove in your home which matched the left hand glove which you left at the crime scene? Then think about this. The glove was found by Mark Fuhrman who we know planted the bloody sock. The same Mark Fuhrman who was recorded complaining about other officers "Not doing shit in order to stitch these f'ing n'ggers" (his own words on the recording). Then when asked by the prosecution if he had planted evidence in order to frame Simpson he pleaded the 5th in order not to incriminate himself. This all happened and still people go on about the bloody glove. It was a plant just like the bloody sock and the terrible job which the Police made (more than likely Fuhrman again) of planting the blood stains in the car . I'm not saying Simpson didn't do it but the only incriminating evidence against him was so blatantly obviously planted by the Police that the jury had to find Simpson not guilty. Marcia Clark, the leading prosecutor even suggested after the trial that Fuhrman her own star witness should be prosecuted. Seriously, you couldn't make this shit up.
@@UndergroundMonkDirect heat or water exposure can lead to the loss of moisture that's naturally found in the pores of the leather hide. This can actually dry up the leather, crack it up, and shrink.
The quantity of blood in police custody changed suspiciously. It varied in several different police records. That and the other shaky behavior of the police in that case and in those years helped get OJ free. He probably was guilty but the police definitely screwed with the evidence anyway.
Don't forget the mixture of OJs, Nicole's, and Ron Goldmans blood in the Bronco. The likeliness of it being erroneous/not related was figured to be 1 in a couple TRILLION.
You forget that there was an anti clotting agent in almost all of the samples at his home and in his car. That proves the blood was planted. Nicole had a $30k cocaine debt. Her roommate Faye Resnik knew trouble was coming and left for rehab 2 days before the murders. Ron Goldman had massive defense wounds on his knuckles, while OJ had no bruises, swelling, etc on his face.
Research the glove brand, they’re good but they’re known for reducing size by itself after some time. Besides that fact I’ve seen people saying that OJ covered his son who actually committed the crime
A company named, "Failure Analysis" in FLA, was hired to see if they could figure out the case. 3 years after the murders, OJ's house keys were found in the bushes. He took off his glove to look for them and never found them. They were still stuck in there 3 years later. An employee of the company told me about this. I'm not sure if they are still in business, but why wasn't this case reopened with new evidence? Because Failure Analysis was also hired to use their computers to figure out if there was one gunman or two for the JFK murder. They know!
Also finding something 3 years later by someone who isn't the police would make it inadmissible in court. Regardless, we know who did it. It's just the miscarriage of justice that gets a lot of people.
Evidence is found all the time by people not the police. Issue is once he's acquitted it's game over. He can admit right after the jury returns verdict and nothing can be done @@Tybalt.
I remember my science teacher noticed that OJ struggled to get the gloves on, but he slipped them off very easily. He was faking the struggle to put them on.
It was his son. OJ was there. But his son did it. That's why there was no mark on him despite Goldman having bruised knuckles and skin under Nicole's nails. No blood in the car and somehow he cleaned up she got to the airport in time. But his son the chef... look into it. It's crazy.
They brought in a salesman for those expensive driving gloves and asked him after looking at his hands what size OJ would wear, and he said the same size as the evidence gloves.
Leaving a trail of his victims blood from the murder scene, down the stairs, out the door and into the White Bronco of Al Cowlings, his getaway accomplice.
@@Chapps1941 Emmett Till’s killers were eventually tried and convicted. Yes, it was way too late. OJ literally got by with murder. Apples and oranges! Please leave race out of it.
Umm… the prosecutors brought up this exact point. They even played the video in court to prove it. It’s beyond me that he got off. It was black against white unfortunately. Some LA cops were racist against black people, so when OJ got off, black people thought they finally won one against the man. I had black friends who thought he did it, but they were happy that a black man didn’t get convicted. They are no longer my friends.
During the same NBC broadcast he was also wearing the Bruno Magli shoes. There's a shot of that as well. Of course he claimed: "I would never wear those ugly ass shoes."
What's the one thing Mark Fuhrman would have to have known in order to plant evidence against Simpson that night and get away with it? Answer: That Simpson DID NOT have an alibi that night. Multiple officers at the crime scene BEFORE Furhman arrived said they only saw one glove. Now, ask yourself this: Why would Fuhrman risk his career, reputation, and freedom to plant the glove at Simpson's home when he had no idea if Simpson had an alibi that night or not? That would be incredibly stupid to assume one of the most famous and recognizable persons on the planet wouldn't have one on that night. That suggestion that he would gamble on that unknown and plant crucial evidence at his home as a result, is just absurd. Let's say Fuhrman were dishonest and stupid enough to plant evidence against suspects during his time in law enforcement, don't you think the defense would have found at least one person he "planted evidence" against in his past and bring them in to testify as such? By the way, when you plead the 5th, you have to do it for every subsequent question after you plead that. You can't pick and choose to use it. So, the last question asking him if he ever planted evidence was merely for show and to make it seem like he did plant evidence.
@@JohnFO5 there were officers there but not detectives. You seem smart enough to know the difference but by that book you wrote maybe not. So you want me to believe a detective who in a disability claim hated blacks and other minorities and also had a manuscript he help write littered with the n word. The detective then gets on the stand and says with confidence he never used the n word. Oh yeah plead the fifth when asked if he ever planted evidence. All those police on the scene but your hero detective found all the key blood evidence in the broncos and the glove at OJ house. both things can be true your hero detective planted evidence and OJ committed the crime. Oh yeah they found the glove and most of the evidence after they found out he had no alibi
Yea looks like the same jury that aquited the cops that beat Rodney King within an inch of his life and the whole incident captured on video and they still were found not guilty. WOW!!!
OJ gave blood sample willingly without attorney present and racist cops spread his blood around to frame him. Go ahead and delete my comment. You snowflakes are so weak.
Jason Simpson (OJ son) did it. While the low speed bronco chase was happening; Jason was boarding a plane from LAX to an undisclosed location. After his plane was airborne, OJ surrender. Coincidence?
The only reason OJ was acquitted was the threat over more riots in Los Angeles. The city had just endured a horrible riot, the jurors had been sequestered away from their homes for over a year ..... they wanted homes to return too!!!
So Mark Fuhrman, the detective, commiting perjury on stand had nothing to do with it? He pleaded the 5th when asked if he planted evidence and he claimed he never used the n-word until the defense produced recordings of him using it multiple times. He destroyed his credibility and the credibility of the investigation.
The only reason why the jury and many other people were convinced that he was innocent is because hes black so its more about black than green when it comes to this. The jury even admited that thats the reason why they found him not guilty. People hate on white people for doing things because of race but black people and other races do it all the time too its just that people usually only think about it as a bad thing when white people do it.
O.J’s law team has to be one of the best of all time because O.J. Indirectly admitted to doing it countless times before he surrendered and he still walked away a free man
That's irrelevant. Mark Fuhrman, the detective, commiting perjury on stand destroyed the case. He pleaded the 5th when asked if he planted evidence and he claimed he never used the n-word until the defense produced recordings of him using it multiple times. He destroyed his credibility and the credibility of the investigation.
First, yes, he did it. Second. The gloves didn't fit. No one made Chris Darden take the risk of having him put them on. Lawyer rule 101: If you don't know the answer to a question before you ask it, DONT ask it.
I understand the sentiment but the sentiment truly doesn't fkin matter in this case and condemning a guilty man. Mfs in California are some of the dumbest mfs in the entire country
For real. Even that recent super viral clip of that lady on CNN saying that black people rallied behind OJ because he got away with taking out two white people...because of Rodney king. It's a crazy clip. I dunno who the lady was but it's only like a week old so it shouldn't be hard to find
I once had to wear gloves that were too small for a whole day's labour. It was uncomfortable but I still got the job done. The fact that this evidence allowed him to walk free is INSANE.
@@JB-423the Chewbacca defense originates from South Park, it is when the defense brings up something totally unrelated as evidence for the defense, usually in an attempt to confuse the jury.
No one ever mentions that he’s fake struggling to put it on. He’s not actually pulling hard on the glove like you normally would. If you were trying to convince people that a perfectly sized glove was too small for your hands this is exactly what it would look like.
Exactly. I don’t see how they didn’t immediately call that out, his struggle looks so fake and he’s spreading his fingers out. It looks like a comedy sketch more than anything . I’ve put on gloves that didn’t fit and they either don’t make it past the fingers or fall off for being too big.
the glove was in fact too small, however it was confirmed by the producer that it shrunk down therefore it was harder for him to put it on. the same new not shrunk glove actually did fit him so yea
"no one ever mentions" lol every thing that could ever be mentioned about this case has been mentioned at least a million times. There is nothing about this case that hasn't been mentioned. It's the most mentioned criminal case in history
Or he already had gloves on. Kinda pointless to say he didnt stretch them over his hands with efficient enthusiasm. Why would anyone do that? He’s on trial for murder. Nobody would make it look easy. That’s preposterous.
They may have made some mistakes, but they didn't try to frame him! They had MORE than enough evidence to convict him, so why put yourself in possible trouble to "frame" somebody who you already have enough evidence to convict?!?!
@@jt-rex6972even if they didn't plant the evidence, the optics were fucked by racist cops. So Mark Fuhrman, the detective, commiting perjury kinda sealed the case. He pleaded the 5th when asked if he planted evidence and he claimed he never used the n-word until the defense produced recordings of him using it multiple times. He destroyed his credibility and the credibility of the investigation.
I think OJ did it but I'll disagree with a fear reaction (flight, suicide) being an indicator of guilt. It indicates the person's confidence that they can beat the case. An innocent person might look at an impending case and be like "I'm screwed" and make a run for it. As a society we overvalue confidence.
I mean, if I realized that my wife died horribly at the hands of someone else. I’d probably do the same things he did. He was grieving and traumatized because he found out that his wife (the person he loved) was killed in the most gruesome and brutal ways known to man. He was not responsible for any of this. But of course, you guys don’t want to admit that.
Homie wrote a book saying "if I DID IT", admitted to abusing his ex-wife, had limited edition shoes that were bloody and left prints, and yea I mean it's a clear miscarriage of justice.
@@DevvGaming101 the glove had shrunk, he was wearing gloves under the gloves when they tried to put them on and he was stretching his fingers out while trying to put it on. The glove did fit.
I met an officer who said he worked at a place to meet his attorneys for the first time and while waiting he was yelling that he did it! Attorney privilege made anything they heard nothing as far as the law cares.
If I was on the prosecution team, I would have taken a pair of my own leather gloves, pretended to struggle putting them on to show how easy it is to make them look like they didn't fit, then put them on easily.
Not to mention the fact that they had a “glove professional” come to the trial and analyse it. He said that it had shrunk. So he said he would go to the factory in Italy and get the exact model and then make OJ try it on. When they did it the glove fit PERFECTLY. And that’s not even me just saying it. The glove professional present even said that it was a perfect fit.
thats crazy. all the evidence im consuming seem to point at oj and im perplexed at how he walked out so easily despite the whole world knowing the truth
Racism. With a lot of civil rights stuff and racism scandals in the media at that time, most of the jury was afraid to convict a high profile black man. @yvelorelai
Any time someone says he's innocent, I bring up the chase. He had a gun, thousands of dollars in cash, a fake goatee and mustache, and his passport, all in a bag in the car. THAT IS THE MOST GUILTY LIST OF ITEMS I HAVE EVER SEEN.
@@flyguyry1but they convicted Scott Peterson partially on the same evidence. Dyed his hair, grew facial hair, had cash and his brothers ID. Same state too just different city/county.
So… We just negate the fact that MARK FURMAN PLANTED EVIDENCE AND WHEN ASKED ON THE STAND HE SAID, “I choose to exercise my 5th amendment.” Case closed.
I'm sure he want enjoying the chase... He was scared. You're original point of an innocent millionaire wouldn't try running from the police for no reason is accurate AF though
It doesn't matter, there is enough reasonable doubt due to police tampering. EDTA( a chemical common in test tubes) was found mixed with a blood sample on the socks planted at the scene. A lab tech admitted to having evidence in his pocket for days and mark furhman( detective) refused to answer on the stand whether he had planted evidence.
@@1Maverick2So you believe cheating on your husband is a capital crime?! He cheated on her plenty of times. Would that make it alright for her to kill him in your opinion. Also, when did she cheat on him?! If you’re referring to Ron Goldman being there: A) OJ and Nicole were DIVORCED and B) There is nothing to suggest that Ron G. and Nicole had a relationship.
He did and he purposely tried to get them not to fit. The prosecution proved he owned the gloves. And in the WORST case of irony, NICOLE bought him the gloves.
I'm a forensic pathologist. The forensic evidence collection was so poor, as shown repeatedly in that trial, that he could not have been found guilty of anything. WE cleaned up our act after that; evidence collection and processing are one of the best in the world. The OJ trial shined a bad light on us.
So mixing two blood sample renders the dna material in the samples unidentifiable or it creates a third, unique dna result unrelated to the original samples? Because that's essentially what they argued in defense about the collection practices.
@@jimnasium452 the defense's job is to create reasonable doubt. They have to make the jury think that it is possible for the evidence to have another explanation. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. Their job is to prove that the evidence is legit and there is no way for someone other than the defendant to have committed the crime. Bad evidence collection and a racist cop can sink any prosecution case.
A lot of folks don’t get this. In their thirst to get OJ locked up, they don’t realize it needs to be done the right way. The State of CA’s history of racism against Blacks and negligence when handling evidence are the primary reasons for OJ’s acquittal.
It’s one thing for Lance Ito to have allowed that glove to be admissible evidence, but to have the guy put it on with rubber gloves underneath as well as the blood shrinking the leather was absolutely absurd and a complete farce.
Actually fun fact, OJ published the book, the family got the rights to the book, and change the title, the family then got sued, and they changed the font size on the cover to comply.
Or, OR... the Jury was made up by a bunch of f'kin muuurons who couldn't understand DNA that was found on the crime scene linked to OJ. That whole jury group was a bunch of re+ards.
Yeah that's what it was. It wasn't that "90% of the jury" voted in a racially motivated manner in order to stick it to the system to get it back for Rodney King. Not my words, one of the jurors'.
Nyah haha.. damn it... We never had to know about to be Krapdashians. ..Well Shit! That figures.. I never liked that guy way back! It's His' damn fault we have to listen to them? Man... Dang...😅😂😊
One juror said something about not trusting medical evidence because she once had an incorrect result on a home pregnancy test. Also the jury of his peers in LA was 66% black in a community that is 11%. You can blame the prosecution for letting that happen since they should have pointed out to the court that the defense was clearly applying a race criteria in choosing who to challenge and dismiss from the pool. Had he not been a celebrity defendant (even a wealthy defendant) they would have lost big but sadly the jury was starstruck and/or thinking about the book deals and interviews post trial more than their duties as jurists. But the best evidence of his guilt was his close friend Robert Kardashian being retained on his legal team ostensibly to prevent the prosecutors and investigators from questioning Kardashian due to attorney client privilege, yet after the trail Kardashian broke all ties with OJ. I wonder what knowledge Kardashian had about his friend that would spoil such a long and close friendship?
So he did it, then jumped in the Bronco with light colored seats covered in blood? Which they only found a few drops that was planted. Then clean his self up enough to go catch a flight and basically had not one drop of blood found on him
Not to mention when the family of the victims were there, he started getting sweaty, having an urge to attack them, causing them to have to be escorted out.
We all know why OJ was not convicted. Hell some of the jurors even made no secret of it. He was black, they were back, they wanted revenge and OJ was the vehicle.
There was a woman on the jury that gave an interview and said she was going to find him innocent regardless because of the Rodney King thing. It was all a ruse.
@@Mr.Bones1983 Which is why we should have a law allowing for a second trial if irrefutable evidence is presented that the first was compromised. The OJ trial would have been a poster child example for such a law. Everyone involved from the jury to the defense should be prosecuted for de-frauding the American people of justice.
Because in the court you can't see well OJ's an actor so that alone he played it up made it seem like it was really hard to put on. And they used a catchy jingle that got in their heads so they never forgot it...If the Gloves don't fit you must acquit. It easy to forget alot of detail in trails it hard to forget a catchy jingle
@@Heavenly_Fury sure, I get what you're saying and don't disagree. But I thought that someone in the news or in the court would have said "umm, it looks like the gloves fit perfectly.. am I the only person seeing this or what?" I never once heard from anyone that the gloves actually fit (until I watched this video) even though it was clear on TV that they fit. I'm just surprised that it took 25+ years for anyone to call this out..but maybe they did and I just missed it.
The law says "beyond a reasonable doubt", and it also has a double jeopardy law in California. It was over before they even got to trial, and THAT is what a good atty can do .
The fact HE was able to put the gloves on instead of someone putting the gloves on him. It’s fairly easy to make it look like a glove doesn’t fit you, especially if you already practiced it. Kangaroo court!
The Akita is the red flag. The dog was found down the street with blood on its paws. There is no way someone is coming to that house if an Akita doesn't know them.
@@Young_Midoriyayou kind of do then. Lol Akitas, in general, are in the top ten list of aggressive dog breeds; usually aimed at other dogs and strangers.
I Agree my previous American/ Japanese akita was protective. But my 9month old pure American is a softy with people. Hopefully he will toughen up he's already 40kg now 😂
Yep, my family had Akita's in the 90's and once I found out Nicole Brown's dog was an Akita, that was it for me. OJ was guilty. Nobody gets near a house with an Akita, in the dark like that. The dog knew her attacker for certain. Akitas are unique in a lot of ways.
Well the defense wasn’t built around the gloves. The defense was built around police corruption. It was actually the prosecution’s idea to have him try on the glove after one of their experts assured them that the glove would fit. Defense had a field day after it backfired. Oh yeah and the tapes of the cop using the N-word and that same cop pleading the 5th when asked if he planted evidence. Also I’m not saying he didn’t do it, I’m saying the prosecution royally fucked up. 😂
100%. OJ did it, but the jury made the correct call based on the cops' mishandling of evidence and piss poor credibility as witnesses, as well as the prosecutors' incompetence. A jury's job is to consider the evidence presented at trial, and that's what they did. That's why things like chain of custody are so important, to make sure that evidence remains untainted for trial.
@@Alex-lf5yiI disagree strongly that they made the correct call. A lot of cases get mishandled much worse and still get a guilty verdict, there is massive bias towards his celebrity status. But I do agree that the blame ultimately lies on the police.
@@notribadsvaulteven if everyone on the jury knows that he did it, if the defendant is not given a fair trial and granted his constitutional rights then it would be unethical to convict. Allowing the justice system to condemn a man without the proper procedures and without the fair trial that all men are entitled to, that sets a precedent that is entirely too dangerous and leads to a future where innocent men are condemned and where the government has been handed the power to enjoy extreme levels of corruption
The gloves didn’t fit because they got soaking wet (with blood) and then dried out. If you know anything about leather you know that will make leather shrink dramatically.
So Mark Fuhrman, the detective, commiting perjury on stand had nothing to do with it? He pleaded the 5th when asked if he planted evidence and he claimed he never used the n-word until the defense produced recordings of him using it multiple times. He destroyed his credibility and the credibility of the investigation.
Fuhrman said the prosecutors abandoned him after the tape. He pleaded guilty when he could not get the prosecutors to call him to the stand for a redirect prior to playing the tapes for the jury. *There is SO much evidence, it could NOT have been anyone else!!"* And OJ certainly didn't look for the killer. Read or watch the whole trial. AND the civil trial where he was found LIABLE FOR THE MURDERS! The civil trial is a legitimate trial! The bar is just a little lower because in the criminal trial the defendant's life could be at stake. You are so wrong. Or just lying because you love OJ or...
@@22lyric I’m old enough to have watch the trial and I’m familiar with the civil case. I’m not sure how my comment sides with OJ. I was just stating the fact that if the lead witness wasn’t a racist cop then maybe justice would have prevailed. And if you watched the trial then I don’t know how I could be lying about Furnan pleading the 5th. I don’t care about OJ or anyone he may or may not have killed. Don’t be mad at OJ. Be mad a Furman.
@@Meauxluvyou just highlighted why it's so important to eliminate racism from the police force.. because a racially motivated cop can absolutely destroy any evidence against the guilty party. It doesn't matter if the defendant is guilty and there is an overwhelming sum of evidence, if all that evidence was collected by a race warrior then all its credibility just went out the window
Saddest thing is you are dumb enough to believe these rumors. The shoes were Bruno Maglli which OJ never owned and the shoes being taken from OJ's house were not of that brand.
exactly.. the police didn't have to plant the blood evidence, so when the state plants evidence, that's not justice.. if they can do it to him, they can do it to anyone of us.
He was already an actor as his second career. After the trial he spent the rest of his life searching for the killer, on golf courses all over the world.
Respectfully disagree. If it'd been an all- or mostly-white jury, yes. But there was ONE, count her, (1), white on that jury. EVERYone else was Black, Latin, or 1/2-Native American. THAT is why he walked. AND, ironically, OJ did not even identify as Black b4 that! He'd once said (direct quote): "I'm not Black, I'm OJ."
@@smartalek180what he is saying is that the reason OJ got away with it was because LAPD was notoriously racist, which is why the jury being mostly black would lead to his acquittal
You know I have often wondered how he could’ve done that without being in total shock, but also having to look in his children’s faces everyday and seeing their Mother somewhere in there I would be in shock for the rest of my life 😢
The problem was the whole trail. The state did a terrible job presenting their case. It was responsible doubt all throughout that case. Mismanagement of evidence, raciest cop’s planting evidence, and the prosecution team just sucked
@@chriscummings9178 the cop didn't plant any evidence, they just discovered that he was racist and used it to exclude his testimony from evidence on the grounds that it couldn't be trusted.
Wasn’t the lawyers it was Rodney king and the B female jurors. An old B lady said she was going to say innocent no matter what evidence they showed after the trial
Not only is there footage of him wearing the gloves. There is footage of him wearing the shoes too! OJ was the luckiest person to ever walk the earth. Everything fell perfectly for him in that case. There was a literal blood trail leading to his bedroom and he somehow got away with it. It’s staggering.
Evil has no conscience. Instead of showing remorse he enjoyed getting away with it. His greatest fear is not being able to avoid his judgement day after his death.
@@bthunder9292 my dad is the same age Emmett till would be, yet for some reason young fellas like you seem more angry about those times when u weren’t even alive. U need to grow up
Well, specifically it was race + LAPD’s corruption (namely major counts of racism in the years prior) + the best team of lawyers money can buy who could capitalize on it. It didn’t really just “turn into a race thing”. Really you can thank the lapd’s corruption and forensic incompetence for the majority of it.
@@danraviv7393 I would argue that the cops completely bungled the investigation (because basically all their tactics at the time revolved around being racist) which meant that the prosecution was left with basically no evidence that couldn't be disputed and the defense was left with a very easy story to acquit him. It totally was a race thing on behalf of the police, but he was also still guilty as sin.
![All That Remains - Divine [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/01rW8JxwpO8/mqdefault.jpg)
OJ is the best evidence OJ did it.
Orange juice?
Looks to me like the glove fit just fine
Yer right about that.
WHY DOES THE MAJORITY OF WHITE MAINSTREAM MEDIA CONTINUE TO PRETEND HOW O.J. KILLED THESE PEOPLE WITHOUT A SCRATCH ON HIS BODY & WAS ABLE TO GET TO LAX AIRPORT WITHIN 25 MINUTES TO CATCH HIS FLIGHT FROM BRENTWOOD. MENTAL ILLNES IS A BIG MONEY CASH COW IN THIS COUNTRY. THE ONLY PEOPLE O.J KILLED WAS IN THE MOVIE " THE KLANSMAN" W/ RICHARD BURTON , & LEE MARVIN
@danny....oh because you say so LOL
Another prosecutor once said,
"There are people sentenced to death on less evidence."
Funny thing is , if he would of been white , people would be screaming IMAGINE IT WAS A BLACK GUY
@@how-totuto9726 if he was white it wouldnt have been as big a story and had been swept under the media rug
That's the problem 😕
Sometimes no evidence at all
The only reason the media has such a big heart in this case is cuz he dropped a J and got away with it. But Js dropped Jesus and got away with it, so what's the big deal?
You left a big part out, he’s not only wearing the gloves on that broadcast but he’s wearing the Bruno Magli shoes he wore when he committed the murders as well
💯💯💯
Yeah! Eventually, he admitted he was the person in the photo where he was wearing the shoes
Allegedly
Allegedly
The fact that he was on a certain medication and they told him to stop so his hand would swell lol!
Also don’t forget the $4,300 Bruno Mali black leather & suede shoes he was wearing at the time of the murders. Only around 300 were ever sold in the US and OJ was seen on TV during a live Monday Night Football broadcast in late 1992 (less than a year before the killings) wearing the same shoes. Unfortunately the prosecution team fumbled it completely and didn’t find that MNF clip of him with the shoes until after the verdict. OJ testified under oath that “I would never wear shoes like that they are ugly as hell.” Of course, he wore them on national TV no one had the due diligence to look. I honestly can’t believe Marsha Clark had the nerve to write those books and then take a job as a lead legal analyst with CNN. She messed that up so badly along with Darden. Had they gotten their hands on that clip the jury would have had a much harder time explaining the shoes away than the stupid gloves
Read "OUTRAGE" bu Melvin Bellìnga.
Both sides screwed up, but Marcia Clark was the worst. She hired a jury selection expert to help select jurors, at $3,500 per day. The expert quit after the third day after Clark refused to listen to her. Clark wanted to pack the jury with black women! The defense was elated.
Melvin Belli
"OJs resting easy now knowing his wife's killer is dead." Random dude in bar the morning after he died.
Edit added random dude in bar because there's a special club of weirdos who cant take a joke.
?
OH resting in HELL is not easy..
@markharmon4963 he is insinuating that since OJ has passed away, the murderer of his wife is now also gone. This is because OJ was the murderer
@@timedfornoreason758 Thanks.
Lol
The leather gloves were covered in wet blood when it dried the leather shrunk, plus he stopped his arthritis meds, hands and joints swelled. He had rubber gloves underneath the leather gloves. If you watch him trying the gloves on, he spread his fingers out, making his hands wider. No wondered they didn't "fit"
The left glove was found outside browns home and the right was found at simpson’s estate. there was also no other suspects besides simpson. brown bought simpson the exact same gloves as a gift. it’s impossible they’re anyone else’s gloves
Besides all of that, it's like they're saying that a dude would go to murder somebody and realize the gloves almost don't fit quite as snug as he'd like, then he just goes "DAMN, THWARTED!"
It's disgusting to this day they could test the inside of those gloves and come up with OJ Simpson's DNA because they were his gloves.
Of course now that they've had him put them on even though he was wearing rubber gloves now any DNA that's in there from him they can discount because the prosecution had him put on those gloves
Oj did it. But furhman could have planted the gloves
Why did 4 prosecutors. Plant fake evidence?
My teacher mentioned that if they were covered in blood, then they’d shrink.
All you have to do is look at it logically.
If you committed a murder and lost a glove whilst doing it. Knowing that you would be prime suspect would you drive home with the other glove on and put it in your cupboard? Then would you you get on a plane and fly to another city hoping that the Police wouldn't find the right hand glove in your home which matched the left hand glove which you left at the crime scene?
Then think about this. The glove was found by Mark Fuhrman who we know planted the bloody sock. The same Mark Fuhrman who was recorded complaining about other officers "Not doing shit in order to stitch these f'ing n'ggers" (his own words on the recording).
Then when asked by the prosecution if he had planted evidence in order to frame Simpson he pleaded the 5th in order not to incriminate himself.
This all happened and still people go on about the bloody glove.
It was a plant just like the bloody sock and the terrible job which the Police made (more than likely Fuhrman again) of planting the blood stains in the car .
I'm not saying Simpson didn't do it but the only incriminating evidence against him was so blatantly obviously planted by the Police that the jury had to find Simpson not guilty.
Marcia Clark, the leading prosecutor even suggested after the trial that Fuhrman her own star witness should be prosecuted.
Seriously, you couldn't make this shit up.
That is false. There has been numerous laboratories study done proving they would not shrink.
@@UndergroundMonkanyone that has ever owned leather gloves knows without a doubt they shrink when they get wet
@@UndergroundMonkDwight? Is that you?
@@UndergroundMonkDirect heat or water exposure can lead to the loss of moisture that's naturally found in the pores of the leather hide.
This can actually dry up the leather, crack it up, and shrink.
61 drops of blood at the scene. Nicole’s: 1 in 170mil chance of error. OJ: 1 in 9 bill. His blood on footprints, her blood on his bedroom.
The quantity of blood in police custody changed suspiciously. It varied in several different police records. That and the other shaky behavior of the police in that case and in those years helped get OJ free. He probably was guilty but the police definitely screwed with the evidence anyway.
Don't forget the mixture of OJs, Nicole's, and Ron Goldmans blood in the Bronco. The likeliness of it being erroneous/not related was figured to be 1 in a couple TRILLION.
You forget that there was an anti clotting agent in almost all of the samples at his home and in his car. That proves the blood was planted. Nicole had a $30k cocaine debt. Her roommate Faye Resnik knew trouble was coming and left for rehab 2 days before the murders. Ron Goldman had massive defense wounds on his knuckles, while OJ had no bruises, swelling, etc on his face.
The worst part is that those gloves do in fact look like they fit
It's been edited to fit before it wouldn't come up to the wrists
@@jonDoe-ml3jqwdym it's been edited
@@jonDoe-ml3jqit sounds like you're going through some Mandela effect, buddy
Ye
I’m still just wondering how does wearing gloves that are ever so slightly too tight stop someone from committing murder
He was told not to take his blood pressure medicine that morning. They wanted his hands as swollen as possible
Prove it!!!
@@ManDinqaKardashian saved him
@@ManDinqaDoesn't matter now. He dead AF
Research the glove brand, they’re good but they’re known for reducing size by itself after some time. Besides that fact I’ve seen people saying that OJ covered his son who actually committed the crime
And they bought him a grand slam from Denny's that morning.
Let's also remember leather shrinks when it's wet. He totally did it.
A company named, "Failure Analysis" in FLA, was hired to see if they could figure out the case. 3 years after the murders, OJ's house keys were found in the bushes. He took off his glove to look for them and never found them. They were still stuck in there 3 years later. An employee of the company told me about this. I'm not sure if they are still in business, but why wasn't this case reopened with new evidence? Because Failure Analysis was also hired to use their computers to figure out if there was one gunman or two for the JFK murder. They know!
Double jeopardy. Legally you cannot try a person for the same crime twice.
@@svlnj Which is typically a good law but the fact that the case could not be solved on the evidence they initially had is just pathetic.
Also finding something 3 years later by someone who isn't the police would make it inadmissible in court.
Regardless, we know who did it. It's just the miscarriage of justice that gets a lot of people.
@Tybalt. There are certain secret societies that protect their own, or that murder opposers (like JFK)
Evidence is found all the time by people not the police. Issue is once he's acquitted it's game over. He can admit right after the jury returns verdict and nothing can be done @@Tybalt.
I remember my science teacher noticed that OJ struggled to get the gloves on, but he slipped them off very easily. He was faking the struggle to put them on.
He was off his meds for swollen joins too
Did you know Nicole was heavily into drugs along with the tennis player that died that day ? 😳 they owed money my friend.
That’s a ridiculous take. They’re not on. Of course they will come right off
@@gt4real377, both things are true
@PeeBurps-gk7cu , nope, If I have so much putting on gloves, they are also a pain to come off!
His shoes were better evidence than the gloves. Only 300 pairs were sold in the US and a footprint of the same exact shoe was found at the crime scene
Well he just joined those two people in hell. Rip juice
It was his son. OJ was there. But his son did it. That's why there was no mark on him despite Goldman having bruised knuckles and skin under Nicole's nails. No blood in the car and somehow he cleaned up she got to the airport in time. But his son the chef... look into it. It's crazy.
@@laartwork Yeah, all the Racist haters focused on OJ, nobody else...
@@kartikaychoudhary8797 lmao, this comment has tickled my brain… Danke shoen
@@TaurusMoon-hu3pdis this for or against OJ I can’t tell
Even the jurors admit they knew he was guilty and that the not guilty verdict was payback for rodney king. Of course he did it
Yeah DNA found at a place he went often. And a paper thin rubber glove abs arthritis medicine shrinks hands
They brought in a salesman for those expensive driving gloves and asked him after looking at his hands what size OJ would wear, and he said the same size as the evidence gloves.
Also doesn't help that 3 black ladies of the jury later came out and said this was retribution for Rodney King.
Add that to the list
That's because they are idiots
Can’t blame them.
@@witikka5134You can never blame them. 2020s "Summer of Love" showed the world that. Ya'll are nothing but victims in all your decisions.
@@witikka5134You can't blame them if you're an idiot, sure. Other than that, you can.
Its the fact that he was running from the police on national television
Oh, pure coincidence that was.... :)
LOL! Did you see the "chase"? It was a bunch of police following his white Bronco at an incredibly SLOW pace for a LONG time.
Leaving a trail of his victims blood from the murder scene, down the stairs, out the door and into the White Bronco of Al Cowlings, his getaway accomplice.
Worst miscarriage of justice EVER!!!
Probably not the WORST, but pretty insanely bad.
Emmett Till says "Hi"
@@Chapps1941 Oh you know they won't count that one. I wonder why?
@@Chapps1941 Emmett Till’s killers were eventually tried and convicted. Yes, it was way too late. OJ literally got by with murder. Apples and oranges! Please leave race out of it.
@@Chapps1941 that one was a extremely maddening one but try this one
Junko Furata
I can’t read minds, but Marcia sure looks like she’s thinking “Godammit Carl, I told you not to have him do that!”
The court completely ignored the fact that HE PUT THE DAMN GLOVES ON!!
Rip to that legend
@@Jaey33 How about no
Umm… the prosecutors brought up this exact point. They even played the video in court to prove it. It’s beyond me that he got off. It was black against white unfortunately. Some LA cops were racist against black people, so when OJ got off, black people thought they finally won one against the man. I had black friends who thought he did it, but they were happy that a black man didn’t get convicted. They are no longer my friends.
Yup!
@Jaey33 NOPE
The jury had a collective IQ of 100
That's why most civilized countries don't have trial by jury like medieval USA
@@GP-qi1ve Yes cope with the fact that your government has full control over you😂
@@MonaLisaHasNoEyebrowsatleast they dont have blacks control their country
Woah, cool it with the racism!
The lawyer that defended and freed him has a special place in hell waiting for him, in a level of hell even worse than OJ's
During the same NBC broadcast he was also wearing the Bruno Magli shoes. There's a shot of that as well. Of course he claimed: "I would never wear those ugly ass shoes."
I mean you can’t have one of the lead detectives who found crucial evidence taking the fifth.
What's the one thing Mark Fuhrman would have to have known in order to plant evidence against Simpson that night and get away with it?
Answer: That Simpson DID NOT have an alibi that night.
Multiple officers at the crime scene BEFORE Furhman arrived said they only saw one glove.
Now, ask yourself this: Why would Fuhrman risk his career, reputation, and freedom to plant the glove at Simpson's home when he had no idea if Simpson had an alibi that night or not? That would be incredibly stupid to assume one of the most famous and recognizable persons on the planet wouldn't have one on that night. That suggestion that he would gamble on that unknown and plant crucial evidence at his home as a result, is just absurd.
Let's say Fuhrman were dishonest and stupid enough to plant evidence against suspects during his time in law enforcement, don't you think the defense would have found at least one person he "planted evidence" against in his past and bring them in to testify as such?
By the way, when you plead the 5th, you have to do it for every subsequent question after you plead that. You can't pick and choose to use it. So, the last question asking him if he ever planted evidence was merely for show and to make it seem like he did plant evidence.
@@JohnFO5 there were officers there but not detectives. You seem smart enough to know the difference but by that book you wrote maybe not. So you want me to believe a detective who in a disability claim hated blacks and other minorities and also had a manuscript he help write littered with the n word. The detective then gets on the stand and says with confidence he never used the n word. Oh yeah plead the fifth when asked if he ever planted evidence. All those police on the scene but your hero detective found all the key blood evidence in the broncos and the glove at OJ house. both things can be true your hero detective planted evidence and OJ committed the crime. Oh yeah they found the glove and most of the evidence after they found out he had no alibi
OJ could have taken the stand holding a bloody knife, and that jury still wouldn't have convicted him!!
Yea looks like the same jury that aquited the cops that beat Rodney King within an inch of his life and the whole incident captured on video and they still were found not guilty. WOW!!!
OJ gave blood sample willingly without attorney present and racist cops spread his blood around to frame him. Go ahead and delete my comment. You snowflakes are so weak.
Only Trump can do that….😊
they didn't want another riot
If there were eye witnesses and videos of him committing the crime, he would still be found not guilty
The OJ case was the first time that I realized our justice system is deliberately designed to protect famous people and people who have money.
You just realized the justice system gave someone a fair trail and it wasn’t rigged with racist everywhere.
welcome to America
You get all the justice you can afford!!
Money doesn’t protect black ppl. Glad OJ was innocent. They would’ve never let him go if it wasn’t for the facts
Please explain how? The jury decided. The jury was made up of normal people.
Jason Simpson (OJ son) did it. While the low speed bronco chase was happening; Jason was boarding a plane from LAX to an undisclosed location. After his plane was airborne, OJ surrender. Coincidence?
The only reason OJ was acquitted was the threat over more riots in Los Angeles. The city had just endured a horrible riot, the jurors had been sequestered away from their homes for over a year ..... they wanted homes to return too!!!
So Mark Fuhrman, the detective, commiting perjury on stand had nothing to do with it? He pleaded the 5th when asked if he planted evidence and he claimed he never used the n-word until the defense produced recordings of him using it multiple times. He destroyed his credibility and the credibility of the investigation.
That actually makes a lot more sense than the not guilty verdict being purely out of revenge.
Goes to teach you that in America the most important color isn’t white, it’s green.
Absolutely. Money rules everything here.
I'm blue.... If I were green I would die. If I were green I would die, if I were green I would die....
The only reason why the jury and many other people were convinced that he was innocent is because hes black so its more about black than green when it comes to this.
The jury even admited that thats the reason why they found him not guilty.
People hate on white people for doing things because of race but black people and other races do it all the time too its just that people usually only think about it as a bad thing when white people do it.
@PhoenixGC89 Money rules everything every where.
In America?😅 Man money rules the world!
O.J’s law team has to be one of the best of all time because O.J. Indirectly admitted to doing it countless times before he surrendered and he still walked away a free man
The jury is what set him free.
It’s not that they are good, it’s that the entire investigation team screwed up so bad and was so incompetent that they couldn’t fail.
@@DoktrDub appointing a well known racist to the case was one of the biggest mistakes.
@@Y0G0FU Appointing a jury that would knowingly free a guilty man as revenge for Rodney King was a bigger mistake though
Yes, they were clever as anything. They read the overall picture accurately and played the court like a Stradivarius.
Never give the defendant control of the evidence. This case became a teaching moment for lawyers ever since.
That's irrelevant. Mark Fuhrman, the detective, commiting perjury on stand destroyed the case. He pleaded the 5th when asked if he planted evidence and he claimed he never used the n-word until the defense produced recordings of him using it multiple times. He destroyed his credibility and the credibility of the investigation.
First, yes, he did it. Second. The gloves didn't fit. No one made Chris Darden take the risk of having him put them on. Lawyer rule 101: If you don't know the answer to a question before you ask it, DONT ask it.
Th Jurors have been saying for years that he is guilty but wanted revenge because of Rodney king
Everyone pretty much knew that was the deal break when the not guilty verdict came in
I understand the sentiment but the sentiment truly doesn't fkin matter in this case and condemning a guilty man. Mfs in California are some of the dumbest mfs in the entire country
For real. Even that recent super viral clip of that lady on CNN saying that black people rallied behind OJ because he got away with taking out two white people...because of Rodney king. It's a crazy clip. I dunno who the lady was but it's only like a week old so it shouldn't be hard to find
Who is Rodney king
@@SXSPRIME a real victim of police brutality unlike George Floyd who died from an overdose
I once had to wear gloves that were too small for a whole day's labour. It was uncomfortable but I still got the job done. The fact that this evidence allowed him to walk free is INSANE.
Also Mark Furman
@@brandonfreeman6517maybe but the jury said they were going to acquit him no matter what
But a world famous millionaire wouldn't wear it,you wore it because you really needed the money,very different circumstances
@@jasonscott4366 One member of the jury confessed that they decided to acquit Oj as a way to get back at white folks.
Reasonable doubt
If putting that glove on was to prove his innocence, it would have slid on....like a glove.
Remember, it's simply impossible to commit a crime if you're wearing something that doesn't fit you.
The delivery of “I don’t know he’s wearing them there” killed me ☠️
Just because he is wearing them doesn't mean they fit i wear Size 40 jeans im a skinny af i wear a belt i can wear them but they don't fit
@@leeterry96oh please
@@leeterry96 his hand was completely in the glove, and it fit perfectly, case closed.
@@leeterry96then it is proof that them fitting doesn't matter he still could have warn them then
I am your 666th liked the dark side of the force is a pathway to many abilities some consider it to be unnatural
His agent told him not to take his arthritis medication for several weeks because they knew that they were going to have him try on the gloves
The ones that shrunk in water and weather for a few days?
His last words were “I did it”
How the hell would you know that? Quit posting made up bullshit. There’s plenty of REAL evidence to prove he did it.
some of the jurors literally said they voted innocent to get back for the black community for Rodney King... 😐😐
Stop being racist and research GLENN ROGERS ....
It was kinda hard for OJ to be found guilty when his lawyer hit the jury with the chewbacca defense.
this doesn't make any sense-- LOL
@@JB-423the Chewbacca defense originates from South Park, it is when the defense brings up something totally unrelated as evidence for the defense, usually in an attempt to confuse the jury.
@@tnuoccaekafsi9808 the main argument is, "it doesn't make any sense"
That does not make sense. Wookies don't live on endor.
It was the ' I hate whitey' defense.
Everyone knows that you can’t commit a murder in gloves that are slightly too tight for your hands.
LOL this should be top comment
Somebody please pin this most sensible comment.
Thank
E
True. It's been talked about in classic literature for centuries.
IMPOSSIBLE
Worst part is they stopped looking for the killer after Oj was acquitted and now the juice expired.
The prosecution also said that freezing and thawing to preserve and test the gloves would have shrunken them
No one ever mentions that he’s fake struggling to put it on. He’s not actually pulling hard on the glove like you normally would. If you were trying to convince people that a perfectly sized glove was too small for your hands this is exactly what it would look like.
Exactly. I don’t see how they didn’t immediately call that out, his struggle looks so fake and he’s spreading his fingers out. It looks like a comedy sketch more than anything . I’ve put on gloves that didn’t fit and they either don’t make it past the fingers or fall off for being too big.
This is exactly what I do with condoms, that’s why they never fit!
the glove was in fact too small, however it was confirmed by the producer that it shrunk down therefore it was harder for him to put it on. the same new not shrunk glove actually did fit him so yea
"no one ever mentions" lol every thing that could ever be mentioned about this case has been mentioned at least a million times. There is nothing about this case that hasn't been mentioned. It's the most mentioned criminal case in history
Or he already had gloves on. Kinda pointless to say he didnt stretch them over his hands with efficient enthusiasm. Why would anyone do that? He’s on trial for murder. Nobody would make it look easy. That’s preposterous.
"Well, it is finally official: Murder is legal in the state of California."
Norm Macdonald
Its purge in cali
Give it 5-10 years and 'ol Norm will go down as a damn psychic.
RIP Norm. The good really do die young. Unlike some people.
This better get the most likes
Classic
Maybe if the cops didn't try to frame a guilty man he'd be in prison.
Hummmm nope....he'd be dead!!
They may have made some mistakes, but they didn't try to frame him! They had MORE than enough evidence to convict him, so why put yourself in possible trouble to "frame" somebody who you already have enough evidence to convict?!?!
@@jt-rex6972even if they didn't plant the evidence, the optics were fucked by racist cops. So Mark Fuhrman, the detective, commiting perjury kinda sealed the case. He pleaded the 5th when asked if he planted evidence and he claimed he never used the n-word until the defense produced recordings of him using it multiple times. He destroyed his credibility and the credibility of the investigation.
The title of the book was decided by the victims dad who got the rights to the book as part of a lawsuit, just a fun fact.
He wrote a suicide note and took police on a chase after his ex was killed. That's clear sign of guilt. But we all know he did it anyway.
Says the ebayguy 🥱
I think OJ did it but I'll disagree with a fear reaction (flight, suicide) being an indicator of guilt. It indicates the person's confidence that they can beat the case. An innocent person might look at an impending case and be like "I'm screwed" and make a run for it. As a society we overvalue confidence.
I mean, if I realized that my wife died horribly at the hands of someone else. I’d probably do the same things he did. He was grieving and traumatized because he found out that his wife (the person he loved) was killed in the most gruesome and brutal ways known to man. He was not responsible for any of this. But of course, you guys don’t want to admit that.
Braindead@@leoartolson4658
Don't ever be on a jury please
Homie wrote a book saying "if I DID IT", admitted to abusing his ex-wife, had limited edition shoes that were bloody and left prints, and yea I mean it's a clear miscarriage of justice.
Still didn’t do it🤷🏾♂️ If I was innocent and the cave people thought I was guilty but proven innocent I’d troll y’all too. Glove didn’t fit😂😂
@@DevvGaming101 the glove had shrunk, he was wearing gloves under the gloves when they tried to put them on and he was stretching his fingers out while trying to put it on. The glove did fit.
@@DevvGaming101 Cave people?
@@DevvGaming101Really because you can pretty clearly see they fit in the courtroom footage lol.
@@DevvGaming101 Let me guess. You think MJ didn't touch those boys right?
I met an officer who said he worked at a place to meet his attorneys for the first time and while waiting he was yelling that he did it! Attorney privilege made anything they heard nothing as far as the law cares.
If I was on the prosecution team, I would have taken a pair of my own leather gloves, pretended to struggle putting them on to show how easy it is to make them look like they didn't fit, then put them on easily.
Not to mention the fact that they had a “glove professional” come to the trial and analyse it. He said that it had shrunk. So he said he would go to the factory in Italy and get the exact model and then make OJ try it on. When they did it the glove fit PERFECTLY. And that’s not even me just saying it. The glove professional present even said that it was a perfect fit.
thats crazy. all the evidence im consuming seem to point at oj and im perplexed at how he walked out so easily despite the whole world knowing the truth
Racism. With a lot of civil rights stuff and racism scandals in the media at that time, most of the jury was afraid to convict a high profile black man. @yvelorelai
@LAkadian on a documentary a juror said that they only said he was innocent was because they wanted revenge for Rodney King
@@LAkadianmost of the jury was black. They were just looking out for their own, even if he was a criminal who murdered white people.
@@NemoShapei thought it was “white guilt” the reasoning for the jury to vote innocent. they knew the white cops fucked up on the rodney king beating
Any time someone says he's innocent, I bring up the chase.
He had a gun, thousands of dollars in cash, a fake goatee and mustache, and his passport, all in a bag in the car.
THAT IS THE MOST GUILTY LIST OF ITEMS I HAVE EVER SEEN.
Fun fact, that information was never told to the jurors in trial.
Not that I think he was innocent, but that list doesn't define guilt.
Unfortunately thats not how guilt it proven. Sorry
@@CurlyFromTheSwirlythis was all found in the car he was trying to flee in... Tf u mean it doesn't show guilt?
@@flyguyry1but they convicted Scott Peterson partially on the same evidence. Dyed his hair, grew facial hair, had cash and his brothers ID. Same state too just different city/county.
You should start a detective channel that's insane how you came up with that by yourself after 30 years
So… We just negate the fact that MARK FURMAN PLANTED EVIDENCE AND WHEN ASKED ON THE STAND HE SAID, “I choose to exercise my 5th amendment.” Case closed.
No one innocent would deliberately lead the cops on a mass slow speed chase like he did. That was a sociopath enjoying the chaos his actions made.
You would be surprised what depressed and or anxious ppl do when they're being arrested
I'm sure he want enjoying the chase... He was scared. You're original point of an innocent millionaire wouldn't try running from the police for no reason is accurate AF though
i would...even if i was innocent. but OJ will still be guilty in the court of Heaven...and promptly sent to Hell.
Well he had a gun pointed to his head the entire time apparently
@@cameroncorbin7717 by who?
I think what’s crazier is the amount of people who genuinely think he DIDN’T do it.
It doesn't matter, there is enough reasonable doubt due to police tampering. EDTA( a chemical common in test tubes) was found mixed with a blood sample on the socks planted at the scene. A lab tech admitted to having evidence in his pocket for days and mark furhman( detective) refused to answer on the stand whether he had planted evidence.
I think you’re mistaken. Plenty of us know he likely did it, but have said “good for him.” Don’t cheat on your husband maybe
@@1Maverick2, thank you ! She was no angel.
The thing is the jury decided he is not guilty. So respect that decision or change the system.
@@1Maverick2So you believe cheating on your husband is a capital crime?! He cheated on her plenty of times. Would that make it alright for her to kill him in your opinion. Also, when did she cheat on him?! If you’re referring to Ron Goldman being there: A) OJ and Nicole were DIVORCED and B) There is nothing to suggest that Ron G. and Nicole had a relationship.
The look of Marcia Clark in the background is hilarious
I know; right? 🤣
He did and he purposely tried to get them not to fit. The prosecution proved he owned the gloves. And in the WORST case of irony, NICOLE bought him the gloves.
I'm a forensic pathologist. The forensic evidence collection was so poor, as shown repeatedly in that trial, that he could not have been found guilty of anything. WE cleaned up our act after that; evidence collection and processing are one of the best in the world. The OJ trial shined a bad light on us.
So mixing two blood sample renders the dna material in the samples unidentifiable or it creates a third, unique dna result unrelated to the original samples? Because that's essentially what they argued in defense about the collection practices.
@@jimnasium452 the defense's job is to create reasonable doubt. They have to make the jury think that it is possible for the evidence to have another explanation. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. Their job is to prove that the evidence is legit and there is no way for someone other than the defendant to have committed the crime. Bad evidence collection and a racist cop can sink any prosecution case.
A highly educated forensic pathologist writes ' shined ' , you're kidding me .
Shone !
A lot of folks don’t get this. In their thirst to get OJ locked up, they don’t realize it needs to be done the right way. The State of CA’s history of racism against Blacks and negligence when handling evidence are the primary reasons for OJ’s acquittal.
did you watch the doc that makes the case his son did it and he covered for him?
Killer goin like "oh no the gloves are slightly tight.... guess cannot kill someone "
His attorney told him before trying on the gloves "whatever you do, do not put on those gloves"!
It’s one thing for Lance Ito to have allowed that glove to be admissible evidence, but to have the guy put it on with rubber gloves underneath as well as the blood shrinking the leather was absolutely absurd and a complete farce.
He was acquitted by a jury of peers so that on them for his acquittal
Right i don’t understand why this line was so genius? I never have lol. Like he could still have done it with gloves that were too small
@@princessm6355 Exactly! Never understood why ill fitting gloves meant there was zero chance he did it. Pretty silly, actually.
Actually fun fact, OJ published the book, the family got the rights to the book, and change the title, the family then got sued, and they changed the font size on the cover to comply.
I always loved how they trusted the suspect to tug on the gloves hard enough to be sure.
Let's be honest...O.J. had THE greatest defense attorneys money could buy, and the prosecution did NOT make their case well enough!!!
Or, OR... the Jury was made up by a bunch of f'kin muuurons who couldn't understand DNA that was found on the crime scene linked to OJ. That whole jury group was a bunch of re+ards.
Kim Kardashian’s dad was his lawyer
@@kj.champ.04_89I was just gonna say that, cheers. Everyone forgets that Kim's etc father was a gargantuan scum bag.
Yeah that's what it was. It wasn't that "90% of the jury" voted in a racially motivated manner in order to stick it to the system to get it back for Rodney King.
Not my words, one of the jurors'.
Not a hard to win the case in a liberal city like Los Angeles that can’t afford to have the optics of a celebrity black man killing a white woman.
I'll never forgive OJ for causing the kardashians to happen.
Worst thing he ever did
Good one
Finally somebody with some common sense.
boo hoo
Nyah haha.. damn it... We never had to know about to be Krapdashians. ..Well Shit! That figures.. I never liked that guy way back! It's His' damn fault we have to listen to them? Man... Dang...😅😂😊
One juror said something about not trusting medical evidence because she once had an incorrect result on a home pregnancy test. Also the jury of his peers in LA was 66% black in a community that is 11%. You can blame the prosecution for letting that happen since they should have pointed out to the court that the defense was clearly applying a race criteria in choosing who to challenge and dismiss from the pool. Had he not been a celebrity defendant (even a wealthy defendant) they would have lost big but sadly the jury was starstruck and/or thinking about the book deals and interviews post trial more than their duties as jurists. But the best evidence of his guilt was his close friend Robert Kardashian being retained on his legal team ostensibly to prevent the prosecutors and investigators from questioning Kardashian due to attorney client privilege, yet after the trail Kardashian broke all ties with OJ. I wonder what knowledge Kardashian had about his friend that would spoil such a long and close friendship?
But remember as a wise defence lawyer once said 'Just because you did it doesn't mean you're guilty'
Wow
Stevie Wonder could see that he did it.
and Ray Charles
his son did it
He didn't do it
So he did it, then jumped in the Bronco with light colored seats covered in blood? Which they only found a few drops that was planted. Then clean his self up enough to go catch a flight and basically had not one drop of blood found on him
Holy shit thank you for this today I needed a good laugh
Crazy to me that Kris kardashian said Nicole told her, if something happens to me, it was my husband. Still sends chills to the bone.
She didn’t have a husband
@@3InitialsNicole Simpson was ojs wife.
@@3Initialslmao do you even know the case
She told Faye Resnick the same thing
why does no one ever mention the fact that Nicole’s hired handyman was a serial killer?
If the glove doesn't fit, it doesn't mean shit...
They didn't need to fit, they needed to cover his fingerprints
Not to mention when the family of the victims were there, he started getting sweaty, having an urge to attack them, causing them to have to be escorted out.
Nobody on the jury has ever tried on a t-shirt in a store over what they were already wearing.
We all know why OJ was not convicted. Hell some of the jurors even made no secret of it. He was black, they were back, they wanted revenge and OJ was the vehicle.
Starter cap
There was a woman on the jury that gave an interview and said she was going to find him innocent regardless because of the Rodney King thing.
It was all a ruse.
@@Mr.Bones1983 Which is why we should have a law allowing for a second trial if irrefutable evidence is presented that the first was compromised. The OJ trial would have been a poster child example for such a law. Everyone involved from the jury to the defense should be prosecuted for de-frauding the American people of justice.
The jury couldn’t care less about anything that was presented, it was a predetermined outcome from the beginning
I always thought the gloves fit perfectly...never understood how they pushed this
Because in the court you can't see well OJ's an actor so that alone he played it up made it seem like it was really hard to put on. And they used a catchy jingle that got in their heads so they never forgot it...If the Gloves don't fit you must acquit. It easy to forget alot of detail in trails it hard to forget a catchy jingle
He was told to stop taking his medicine for a few days so that his hands could swell up.
@@Heavenly_Fury sure, I get what you're saying and don't disagree. But I thought that someone in the news or in the court would have said "umm, it looks like the gloves fit perfectly.. am I the only person seeing this or what?" I never once heard from anyone that the gloves actually fit (until I watched this video) even though it was clear on TV that they fit. I'm just surprised that it took 25+ years for anyone to call this out..but maybe they did and I just missed it.
Yeah I always wear a pair of latex gloves under me leather gloves
@@kidzbop38isstraightfire92The emperor has no clothes. I’ve literally never seen this footage before and of course the glove fits.
The law says "beyond a reasonable doubt", and it also has a double jeopardy law in California. It was over before they even got to trial, and THAT is what a good atty can do .
The fact HE was able to put the gloves on instead of someone putting the gloves on him. It’s fairly easy to make it look like a glove doesn’t fit you, especially if you already practiced it. Kangaroo court!
The Akita is the red flag. The dog was found down the street with blood on its paws. There is no way someone is coming to that house if an Akita doesn't know them.
I must have a defective akita cuz She could care less about ppl coming into the house. She just gonna chill with them
@@Young_Midoriyayou kind of do then. Lol
Akitas, in general, are in the top ten list of aggressive dog breeds; usually aimed at other dogs and strangers.
Akitas are dumb AF everybody coming in
I Agree my previous American/ Japanese akita was protective. But my 9month old pure American is a softy with people. Hopefully he will toughen up he's already 40kg now 😂
Yep, my family had Akita's in the 90's and once I found out Nicole Brown's dog was an Akita, that was it for me. OJ was guilty. Nobody gets near a house with an Akita, in the dark like that. The dog knew her attacker for certain. Akitas are unique in a lot of ways.
Well the defense wasn’t built around the gloves. The defense was built around police corruption. It was actually the prosecution’s idea to have him try on the glove after one of their experts assured them that the glove would fit. Defense had a field day after it backfired. Oh yeah and the tapes of the cop using the N-word and that same cop pleading the 5th when asked if he planted evidence. Also I’m not saying he didn’t do it, I’m saying the prosecution royally fucked up. 😂
100%. OJ did it, but the jury made the correct call based on the cops' mishandling of evidence and piss poor credibility as witnesses, as well as the prosecutors' incompetence.
A jury's job is to consider the evidence presented at trial, and that's what they did. That's why things like chain of custody are so important, to make sure that evidence remains untainted for trial.
@@Alex-lf5yiI disagree strongly that they made the correct call. A lot of cases get mishandled much worse and still get a guilty verdict, there is massive bias towards his celebrity status. But I do agree that the blame ultimately lies on the police.
@@notribadsvaulteven if everyone on the jury knows that he did it, if the defendant is not given a fair trial and granted his constitutional rights then it would be unethical to convict. Allowing the justice system to condemn a man without the proper procedures and without the fair trial that all men are entitled to, that sets a precedent that is entirely too dangerous and leads to a future where innocent men are condemned and where the government has been handed the power to enjoy extreme levels of corruption
Ultimately, it is better for 100 guilty men to walk free than for one innocent man to be wrongfully condemned.
@@notribadsvaultsounds like emotions
The gloves didn’t fit because they got soaking wet (with blood) and then dried out. If you know anything about leather you know that will make leather shrink dramatically.
The fact he said he didn't own a pair shoes that left the bloody footprint
He was acquitted to avoid another LA riot.
most simple yet accurate explanation
Ignorant.....LOOK UP GLENN ROGERS
So Mark Fuhrman, the detective, commiting perjury on stand had nothing to do with it? He pleaded the 5th when asked if he planted evidence and he claimed he never used the n-word until the defense produced recordings of him using it multiple times. He destroyed his credibility and the credibility of the investigation.
Too bad the lead detective plead the 5th when asked if he planted evidence.
Fuhrman said the prosecutors abandoned him after the tape. He pleaded guilty when he could not get the prosecutors to call him to the stand for a redirect prior to playing the tapes for the jury. *There is SO much evidence, it could NOT have been anyone else!!"* And OJ certainly didn't look for the killer. Read or watch the whole trial. AND the civil trial where he was found LIABLE FOR THE MURDERS! The civil trial is a legitimate trial! The bar is just a little lower because in the criminal trial the defendant's life could be at stake. You are so wrong. Or just lying because you love OJ or...
He didn't pled the 5th when asked if he planted evidence. He pled the 5th when the prosecutor's shown a tape of him saying the N word.
@@22lyric I’m old enough to have watch the trial and I’m familiar with the civil case. I’m not sure how my comment sides with OJ. I was just stating the fact that if the lead witness wasn’t a racist cop then maybe justice would have prevailed. And if you watched the trial then I don’t know how I could be lying about Furnan pleading the 5th. I don’t care about OJ or anyone he may or may not have killed. Don’t be mad at OJ. Be mad a Furman.
@@Meauxluvyou just highlighted why it's so important to eliminate racism from the police force.. because a racially motivated cop can absolutely destroy any evidence against the guilty party. It doesn't matter if the defendant is guilty and there is an overwhelming sum of evidence, if all that evidence was collected by a race warrior then all its credibility just went out the window
Or be mad at both... Or neither... We're not your parents... Unless... Son?
Marcia’s face when he’s trying on the gloves lmao
The evidence the court did not allow showed beyond any reasonable doubt... that is the sad part.
Plus the saddest most f’ed up fact that Nicole got them for him as a present. The irony.
Saddest thing is you are dumb enough to believe these rumors. The shoes were Bruno Maglli which OJ never owned and the shoes being taken from OJ's house were not of that brand.
A murdering liar and a Banana Republic justice system.
He was innocent. Get over it
exactly.. the police didn't have to plant the blood evidence, so when the state plants evidence, that's not justice.. if they can do it to him, they can do it to anyone of us.
@@lordfriezachrist6546🤣🤣🤣🤣
I wonder if OJ will “fit” into Heaven
@@andrewferguson8032Heaven had a retrial and found him guilty. They banished him to hell for life.
I checked the records... he walked.
He was already an actor as his second career.
After the trial he spent the rest of his life searching for the killer, on golf courses all over the world.
The LA riots was probably the real reason why they didn’t convict him.
That is true.
Respectfully disagree. If it'd been an all- or mostly-white jury, yes. But there was ONE, count her, (1), white on that jury. EVERYone else was Black, Latin, or 1/2-Native American. THAT is why he walked. AND, ironically, OJ did not even identify as Black b4 that! He'd once said (direct quote): "I'm not Black, I'm OJ."
Nah, just a shitty trial altogether. These exceptions always pop up if you look hard enough.
The LA rides was in 1992, the trial was in 1996.
@@smartalek180what he is saying is that the reason OJ got away with it was because LAPD was notoriously racist, which is why the jury being mostly black would lead to his acquittal
"If the glove didn't fit, then explain this shit!"
The glove was soaked in blood from the murder.That caused it to shrink.
Oj Simpson cowardly viciously and brutally murdered his ex wife and her friend because he was a low life POS with money. You’re welcome ☺️
@@snave59 you ignored everything in this video, didn't you?
@@MrBell762this dude for sure did
@@robertthornton5692 you talking about me or snave?
You know I have often wondered how he could’ve done that without being in total shock, but also having to look in his children’s faces everyday and seeing their Mother somewhere in there I would be in shock for the rest of my life 😢
They just said innocence so there would be no riots
Problem was the jury, they had made up their mind before the trial even started.
And jurors have come out and admitted it
The problem was the whole trail. The state did a terrible job presenting their case. It was responsible doubt all throughout that case. Mismanagement of evidence, raciest cop’s planting evidence, and the prosecution team just sucked
@@chriscummings9178 they planted evidence huh? So all Nicole’s blood and Ron’s blood was that planted??? 😂
@@peterpiper3790not that part. But there was a lot fucked up with the prosecution doing too much. It's genuienly dum
yeah watch the documentary OJ Made In America . Its probably the best documentary i've ever seen
@@chriscummings9178 the cop didn't plant any evidence, they just discovered that he was racist and used it to exclude his testimony from evidence on the grounds that it couldn't be trusted.
He was guilty. He was an abusive husband, threatened to kill her previous times . Money can buy good lawyers.
You mean color of skin trumps irrefutable evidence?
Wasn’t the lawyers it was Rodney king and the B female jurors. An old B lady said she was going to say innocent no matter what evidence they showed after the trial
How do you even know this 😂stop making white ppl look stupid
Had nothing to do with the lawyers. Didn’t wanna convict a black dude lest those people start another riot.
@davidporter671 oh it fucking did. If Oj was a random poor black man the trial would've lasted five minutes
Not only is there footage of him wearing the gloves. There is footage of him wearing the shoes too! OJ was the luckiest person to ever walk the earth. Everything fell perfectly for him in that case. There was a literal blood trail leading to his bedroom and he somehow got away with it. It’s staggering.
Evil has no conscience.
Instead of showing remorse he enjoyed getting away with it.
His greatest fear is not being able to avoid his judgement day after his death.
O.J killed everybody in that driveway that night.
I don't care what nobody say.
- Steve Harvey
He was Acquitted. Get Over it
@@bthunder9292You’re not biased or anything.
@NotaGabeItch Neither waz them Neanderthals at the Emmitt Till trail. This is Amerikkka of kourze I'm biased.w
@@bthunder9292bro wtf is your spelling
@@bthunder9292 my dad is the same age Emmett till would be, yet for some reason young fellas like you seem more angry about those times when u weren’t even alive. U need to grow up
Trial was never about if he did it. Dude was guilty as hell. However it turned into a race thing which muddied the entire trial.
Well not by accident, his lawyers turned it into that
Well, specifically it was race + LAPD’s corruption (namely major counts of racism in the years prior) + the best team of lawyers money can buy who could capitalize on it. It didn’t really just “turn into a race thing”. Really you can thank the lapd’s corruption and forensic incompetence for the majority of it.
@@danraviv7393 I would argue that the cops completely bungled the investigation (because basically all their tactics at the time revolved around being racist) which meant that the prosecution was left with basically no evidence that couldn't be disputed and the defense was left with a very easy story to acquit him.
It totally was a race thing on behalf of the police, but he was also still guilty as sin.
Yep. Remember this was right after the Rodney King trial fiasco. And we all know how well that went.
@@danraviv7393 LAPD framed a guilty man.
After the trial there were photos from that same game he broadcasted and was wearing the rare shoes that left blood prints. He is 100% guilty.
I think the bloody socks on his bedroom floor and literal cookie trail of evidence from the crime scene to his house basically says it all.