Predictably, WSJ focuses mostly on equipment & next to nothing on nuclear doctrine & operations. A lot of the PLARF weaknesses cited by WSJ (e.g. the vulnerability of SSBNs) are of little relevance in the context of the PLA's "minimal deterrence" doctrine - meaning that it doesn't plan to attempt any surprise attacks (i.e. 1st strike) on an adversary, & it only has to respond w/ a sufficiently devastating counterattack to any enemy 1st strike attempt. That's why it has never built & doesn't need to build anywhere near as big of an arsenal as that of the US. Even if a portion of the PLARF's arsenal is neutralized in an enemy 1st strike, it will still have enough left to destroy enough enemy population centers in a counterstrike to ensure MAD. This is the rationale behind the DF-41 silos. Even if about a quarter of the 300+ silos are filled with MIRV'd DF-41 ICBMs, those silos alone be more than enough to make a US first strike impossible, regardless of how "stealthy" the Columbia SSBNs might be.
@@beastmode8203they wont need to attack taiwan, the us will collapse when the dollar collapse and their allies jump ship one by one, japan is now buying russian oil at full price, and france is selling oil in yuan same saudis, spain and hungary presidents are visiting china for talks, eventually only the uk will be your ally
It's a wonderful content by WSJ but the hard fact is you cannot compare nuclear power of two countries by equipments, once a Country is Nuclear State then no country can ever dream of military conflict with it like for example US has World Strongest Military Force but US can even not dare to think of invading North Korea.
@@symonsmith3497 You saying it doesn’t? Even China doesn’t dare claim to be above the US in capabilities. They simply claim they are the leading military power in the indopacific.
@@symonsmith3497You're dreaming.. The biggest air force in the world is US Air Force, and second biggest air force in the world is the US Navy. The USD is the reserve currency of the world, and its the US's responsibility to police their money.
A salted bomb, a nuclear weapon designed to function as a radiological weapon, producing enhanced quantities of radioactive fallout, rendering a large area uninhabitable. A fallout shelter would be useless because the radiation would last hundred of years. A losing country would threaten to use such a doomsday weapon.
Showing a shadow of a Yak-130 (A Russian jet trainer and Attack aircraft) to illustrate the H-20 bomber 😂 Nice job WSJ ! BTW ! H-20 is rumoured to be just like the stealth flying wing B-2, perhaps a copy. Which could replace the old H-6s
Lol 😂China has horrible relations with its neighbors not just the US. Also the CCP has a horrible history with human rights violations. US isn’t perfect but it’s ALOT better than communism. Go research the crimes committed by the CCP and appreciate your first world democracy
@@RiseSun3 You can talk about how good the relations between the US and its neighbors are. Talking about human rights, you can also tell me how the US got its land from Native Americans, how the heck did Native Americans, the owners of the American Continent, become the minority group of this land?
@@cowholy3031 many nations have annexed lands throughout history. For example, China annexed Tibet, and Russia annexed the whole of Siberia, which was originally inhabited by native peoples.
@@tluangasailo3663 When China owned Tibet, the United States and India were not yet established. In addition, India annexed Bangladesh, Andaman-Nicoba Islands, Kashmir, Ladak, Sikkim, northwestern Myanmar, Goa ...
I think it’s a US mentality that some things are only allowed by the U.S. and can only be done by the U.S. No other countries are allowed to do so. Thus, whenever any other country comes even close to the U.S., they would take it as a threat.
Yeah so by your logic is we should all horde weapons and threaten to kill each other cause someone else does. Sounds like the pro gun argument. That’s going really well in the US. No shootings at all lol 😅
@@wiktorjachyra1869 No need at all to defend nuclear expansion, the other way, denuclearization should be a global effort. NO ONE should have these weapons, including the U.S.. We will only evolve as a species when we stop this idiotic notion of wanting to attack each other and holding weapons like that as "deterrents".
China is a country with sea and road-based mid-course anti-missiles. There are 30,000 kilometers of underground nuclear facilities. Because China was under the nuclear threat of the United States and the Soviet Union. (There are specific attack cities and how many nuclear bombs are assigned to each city)
Its so disappointing that after all these years of fighting and killing each other for a piece of land. And now we face a wipe of the human race because of a piece of land, which we will probably destroy in the process too. no hope.
Seriously WSJ, big point missed. No mention of hypersonic missiles, arguably one of China's bigger strengths and an area where they lead the Americans.
If they bring up the topic of hypersonic missiles, they will have to discuss the upcoming battalions of US hypersonic missiles, which are all more advanced than the Chinese ones, for example US already have multiple successful tests on scramjet hypersonics , a feat China haven't yet able to do so, a scramjet are far advanced than the current Chinese hypersonic
😁They are having protests all over the country because they took away the health care benefits from their elderly retired people. They spent all their money on balloons😂
@@deebil8099 They are out of money. All numbers CCP displays to the world are fake, it is a Ponzi Scheme decrepit economy, so it is natural the madness of their dictators spending everything in warmongering and nonsensical balloons while people suffer and starve.
@@FlambartPhotography Yea, I know. Their real GDP numbers are at least 30% lower than what they claim. They have been pumping up their GDP by building ghost cities and bridges to nowhere and not writing off that as bad debt. Now they are running out of debt and their economy is going to collapse.
3 more important factor is ignored here. 1. Anti Ballistic missile defence, the nukes has to reach its target to be effective. 2. Hypersonic nukes, is a sure thing. 3. Satellite guidance and surveillance capabilities, how resilient and how dependable are they during wartime.
ballistic missiles are technically hypersonic, the MIRVs reentering the atmosphere can travel up to mach 7. when people are talking about hypersonic missiles, they typically think of scramjet missiles that go above mach 5 but they forget ballistic missiles are hypersonic so technically the first hypersonic missiles were the early ballistic missiles made by the germans in the 1940s
ballistic missiles dont have to rely on satellite guidance, the nuclear missiles can be guided using active radar homing, semi-active radar homing, passive radiation homing, infrared homing, laser guidance, and coordinate and gps guidance which is the common
@@OscarZheng50The chinese hypersonic missiles maneuvered...unlike a ballistic missiles.. whose course can be plotted and intercepted....that's the difference! They tested..sending a hypersonic..vessel..the circled..the earth..then dis charge a load,..America's missiles shield...do not face South ( because..no ballistic missiles hv the range to come from the south...)
Maybe the concept of a nuclear 'triad' ought to be revised for the modern strategic nuclear reality/capacities, etc, as in, the cold war paradigm of ICBMs, SLBMs, and strategic bombers doesn't really reflect the current strategic arsenals of the world's nuclear powers... Which have some qualitatively different systems that some nations field, including: -the old triad' of ICBMs, SLBMs, and conventional bombers, AND: -road mobile ICBMs (as well as strategic cruise missiles like the GLCM 'Glick-um' which was deployed in Europe near the end of the Cold War, and which some analysts considered a strategic checkmate vs the USSR-, and helped end the 4 decades of MAD), -manuverable hypersonic missiles/glide vehicles, -stealth (as opposed to conventional) bombers, -maybe even space-based weapons (currently restricted by treaty, but who knows?) -doomsday weapons like Russia's Poisiden '100 megaton' autonomous nuclear powered UUV, -and, (I hope not) something like a cobalt 60 doomsday nuke... At least the U.S. backed away from such doomsday weapons like FOBS, EMP nukes, and the SLAM nuclear powered hypersonic radiation-spewing multi warhead cruise missile, in the 60s! Maybe others will (other than Russia, apparently! China has demonstrated a FOBS capability, BTW, which is qualitatively different and much more threatening/hard to detect and counter than 'normal' ICBMs...) Thoughts 🤔?
Do you really think the US backed away from developing those weapons? Who knows what the US truly has in its arsenals? What's sure is that they will have multiple trump cards and weapons that are hidden from the public.
The only thing to truly unite humanity if only for a time would be an external common enemy. But any external common enemy is leagues ahead of us. But in house squabbling isn't helping us.
More than military capabilities, I am concerned that USA is loosing the edge in science abs technology. Once that happens, you will see the reflection of that in military as well as economic capabilities.
The US keeps their technology classified. China enjoys bragging and showing off all of their technology. Anyone who brags about something is insecure about that thing. The powerful people don't need to brag.
hahhaa i think the US would win over China? How many would like to see China vs USA at war? Please put your comments below. or USA/NATO vs RUSSIA. As I understand, China will build many new houses on MARS.
In media, if it bleeds it leads. It is all about attracting viewership by hype. That is one reason. Another reason could be that main stream media is the mouthpiece of the government, and since the CHINA-US relation isn't the best now, so mainstream helping to pump the government's narrative.
i am not an expert but I have been studying Chinese military as a hobby since 2008, when their military had essentially nothing modern...to the rapid build up and explosion in military hardware and technologies in the 2010s...and I have to say that Chinese "military expert" guy is really funny, his comments are both worthless and silly at the same time, I dont think he actuallys knows anything about chinese military to be honest...anyway
@@jeffreybongos4837 I was not replying to you. I was asking that guy a question, because he said the "expert" is wrong. And I'm asking why he thinks he is wrong , he should explain why he's wrong instead of making up random bs
I don’t understand why USA can’t just allow China to own the South China Sea I don’t understand, it says China in the name. Please, USA vs China don’t happen
🗣Frankly speaking, the point is all these superpowers having several hundred or even thousands of nuclear warheads in their arsenal is not just about deterrence anymore, but to destroy earth and human civilization instantly in a blink of eye. Let's pray that sanity and humanity can prevail in this ever-increasing complex world we live in, earth can survive in this continue senseless arms race among big powers.
Well I think China is only interested in Taiwan and does not look for confrontations with other countries but if these countries attempt to interfere in China's plans for Taiwan then China would definitely respond.
Oh realy? Is that why China invaded Vietnam in 1979 and the USSR in 1969, and annexed territory from Tajikistan in 2011, Kyrgyzstan in 2002 and Kazakhstan in 1998, has been annexing maritime territory from the Philippines, and currently claims to own the entire South China Sea??
Throw in Russia in the match up. Both China and Russia know fully well that if either one of them is taken down by US the remaining party will not stand a chance with US and it's pack. If China is being dragged into the cesspits then it has no incentives to take a neutral stand on the Ukraine conflicts and will then provide full logistics to Russia. US could very well regret to involve China at this stage.
China alone outnumber and outclass the entire NATO + Russia by a long shot. China is superior in population and manpower. China is superior in industrial output. China is superior in infrastructure. China is superior in missile technology. China is superior in Naval firepower. China is superior in logistics networks. China is also the largest global supplier of raw material. China is the largest trading partner of the entire Western world and Russia. So in a sense, China can crush the West like a bug. This isn't just a speculation but a logical reasoning given the facts I put up here above.
China does not support Russia's aggression against Ukraine at all. If Russia thinks that Ukraine's entry into NATO is threatening itself, it should learn from the United States to engage in proxy wars, rather than end itself and occupy Ukraine's land. It is too reckless to do so in this day and age up! This will make all small and medium-sized countries worry about being annexed by big powers, and thus seek to be protected by other big powers outside the region, which is very detrimental to China's goal of ensuring the stability of its two regions, Central Asia and Southeast Asia.
You'd have to define victory. You mean to defeat an enemy in a country on the other side of the globe, we do that pretty good. Problem comes when we occupy said country for two decades, at a certain point you lose the support of public opinion. If we were like other countries and took over and just subjugated the civilian populace, and intentionally killed unarmed civilians , yea that would make occupying countries easier but we didn't do that. Fighting wars where there aren't any actual objectives other than "occupy this space" make it impossible to have a decisive victory. America will never be invaded and taken over, if America is ever destroyed or truly defeated, the only one that I see ever able to do that is us to ourselves. If anything, a true conflict against another nation, especially a righteous one, will do nothing but finally bring the country together again.
Western countries has most nuclear weapons, still they're portrayed as saviours, And they portray other aspirational countries as destroyer, we know what happened in Iraq, libiya, siriya, Vietnam.....
“They launched a long-range missile,” General John Hyten, the outgoing vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff told CBS News. “It went around the world, dropped off a hypersonic glide vehicle that glided all the way back to China, that impacted a target in China.”18 Nov 2021
@@Pfyzer close but no. They are very detectable, and they are actually slower than and ballistic missiles depressed trajectory, but they posses some maneuver capabilities which makes it hard for midcourse intercept
For huge countries like US, China and Russia, maybe their nuclear weapons are one superior than another. But it doesn't change the fact they will endup together once the nuclear war started.
@@tluangasailo3663 If you are Vietnamese. So you must have been brainwashed by your textbooks. The Chinese almost occupied your capital, but because it was a punitive war, they declared a ceasefire and returned to China
It is also a large country with a population of more than 100 million and a vast area. Now China's nuclear weapons are only a fraction of that of the United States, but four of China's neighboring countries are nuclear states (Russia, North Korea, India, Pakistan), what will happen to the United States if there are nuclear weapons around the United States? (Like Cuba?) ）
China has more than 2,000 nuclear weapons. The United States likes to bad-mouth the number of China's nuclear weapons. China has not announced the number of nuclear weapons. In the military parade in 2019, the total number of nuclear warheads of df5b, 31a, and 41 was 300. The United States said that China has 350 nuclear warheads, which is just a joke.
Their population shrunk for the first time last year and is forecasted to continue declining as time goes on. As their population shrinks, GDP shrinks, military budget shrinks, their ability to compete against the US will decline.
How about the American population? The European American population is shrinking and the Latino population is expanding so rapidly that sooner or later the president of the US will have to deliver his State of the Union address in Spanish.
@@npc2480 no, I was speaking specifically about China. You can’t just apply that to everyone. Africa’s agricultural land sucks and most of its rivers aren’t commercially navigable. African countries are also too fragmented and dysfunctional and unorganized to ever become super powers.
I don’t know if you deleted your reply or RUclips censored it but my comment is basically debunking the idea that population decline automatically means lower GDP. GDP can increase when people are more productive with automation and high tech industries like AI. Each person can then spend more money as they make more money by being more productive working in a high tech industry instead of blue collar work putting together iPhones on an assembly line. Also, just look at the US population and how it’s one fourth of China but has a higher GDP. This is the reason why many low paying jobs are moving out of China because wages has been slowly increasing.
Half of China’s population is still in the rural areas. That’s why there is potential for China to expand its economy. A poor farmer in China making $500 will get educated to become a doctor making $100,000.
@@kudzaim5434 lol... Lies. Taliban was hardly operating in urban areas and were mainly out in the open areas such rural villages or hideouts in Mountains! What about Vietnam/ Saigon. Are you going to use the same excuse?
@@9229Thabzexactly who lives in those villages aren't they civilians a precision strike on a village won't make any sense. Yes Taliban was clever for using this trick
What really matters, is that US has more to lose. Our lifestyle based on wealth & technology will cease if one city is destroyed; the following day our stock market will crash, our economy will collapse,, there will be a run on groceries, fuel, & banks; most people do not have skills to live an 1880's lifestyle. Our cities across the nation will descend into chaos.
I think its now the world of Hypersonic missles, people will be very scared to launch nuclear attack due to the repercussion from the other countries, but Hypersonic missles acts as a proxy tool. No defence systems will counter an hypersonic missle in the world. And also one more key difference is US won so many wars in the past and China has not won any till date. Having all the arsenal is one thing, knowing how to use if is a whole new different thing.
Take a look at what wars the United States has won in modern times, spending tens of trillions of dollars to fight countries that have no ability to fight back, burdening its own citizens with heavy debts, and making people in third world countries full of hate for the United States. China can win these wars countless times if it wants to fight ， but what's the meaningful?
The U.S. should support us the africans and help us grow, we are the future of the world sooner or later, china and russia are trying to take over africa, U.S. should not let that happen.
@@blurckbud When i said the africa is the future i mean a win win situation for both africa and U.S., there's no shame about that, china are over 2 billion people working day night to get stronger army to take over the world.
Looking at their track records, they're all merciless vultures. I want an Africa that stands on it's own because whether they like it or not the 'superpower' nations need our resources
There is a big big difference between theory and experience. China has knowledge and experience in communist rule, it's what the US doesn't have. Now China has gained knowledge and experience in western rule this is why China has an edge over the US and the rest of the west in world financial dominance notwithstanding the fact that western financial sanctions against Russia are a signal of the downfall of western dominance.
Dominance has nothing to do with it. Sanctioning Russia was a stupid move as the West lost its credibility after that. Now every nation is avoiding trading in Western currencies and demanding trade with their local currency. Also no nation is depositing any of their national funds in any Western bank. World is also opting for an alternative payment system. And out of all this China has benefited from it the most.
@@anindependentthinker.2156 those were built and developed back during the Cold War and world war 2 days. The US have stopped developing nuclear weapons now that we are in a modern civilized era and everyone wants world peace. In fact , the US has been dismantling most of their nuclear weapons
The United States, with thousands of nuclear warheads, accuses China, with a few hundred warheads, of continuing to develop nuclear weapons. Classic double standard.🤣
@@miaorenfeng1 most of the US nuclear weapons were developed during the Cold War and world war 2 era. The U.S. has since scaled back on developing newer nuclear warheads. They are actually dismantling some of them. So I’m surprised the world is just sitting there while China grow their stockpile
@@KCKnowsBest Two options, 1 the US reduces its nuclear warheads to the same number as China 2 China increases its nuclear warheads to the same number as the US. Which option do you prefer?🤣
Pm go America 🇺🇸 country military 2040 fight for the right fight China country false down join Philippines to win Philippines 🇵🇭 is the most powerful country give all support for freedom and prosperity successlin that the important things especially in all the sea
America called it "Liberation" instead of "Invasion". That was what US call it in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and the list goes on... Why the double standard? Confused... Please enlighten. Genuine question... Instances of the United States "liberated" or overthrowing, or attempting to overthrow, a foreign government since the Second World War. (* indicates successful ouster of a government) China 1949 to early 1960s Albania 1949-53 East Germany 1950s Iran 1953 * Guatemala 1954 * Costa Rica mid-1950s Syria 1956-7 Egypt 1957 Indonesia 1957-8 British Guiana 1953-64 * Iraq 1963 * North Vietnam 1945-73 Cambodia 1955-70 * Laos 1958 *, 1959 *, 1960 * Ecuador 1960-63 * Congo 1960 * France 1965 Brazil 1962-64 * Dominican Republic 1963 * Cuba 1959 to present Bolivia 1964 * Indonesia 1965 * Ghana 1966 * Chile 1964-73 * Greece 1967 * Costa Rica 1970-71 Bolivia 1971 * Australia 1973-75 * Angola 1975, 1980s Zaire 1975 Portugal 1974-76 * Jamaica 1976-80 * Seychelles 1979-81 Chad 1981-82 * Grenada 1983 * South Yemen 1982-84 Suriname 1982-84 Fiji 1987 * Libya 1980s Nicaragua 1981-90 * Panama 1989 * Bulgaria 1990 * Albania 1991 * Iraq 1991 Afghanistan 1980s * Somalia 1993 Yugoslavia 1999-2000 * Ecuador 2000 * Afghanistan 2001 * Venezuela 2002 * Iraq 2003 * Haiti 2004 * Somalia 2007 to present Honduras 2009 * Libya 2011 * Syria 2012 Ukraine 2014 * 2014 - 2022 - 6 countries yet to verify. Pakistan 2022 * Haiti 2022 *
Just tired of these US vs China stuff. This not a movie or joke. The whole thing is just getting way out of hand. There is no winner in any conflict. Neither side is a country that can just WIN or Loose against the other.
If China and the U.S. did have a nuclear war 20 or 30 of China's nuclear warheads would have a devastating effect on the entire U.S. The bomb that fell on Hiroshima was a 15 -20 kiloton bomb. The warheads on our Trident missiles are 475 kilotons or 60 - 70 kilotons. I'm sure the yields of the warheads in China's nuclear arsenal are comparable. If a 500 kiloton bomb hit New York City the fireball alone would be the size of Manhattan Island. We need to start discussions on arms limitations with China. We don't need a repeat of the Cold War.
Human don't think what these massive weapons would bring to earth but God is watching we don't know what Gods gift to us because human don't gave respect to Gods creation
![Eminem - Fuel (feat. JID) [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/t5H_CewqpKA/mqdefault.jpg)
Predictably, WSJ focuses mostly on equipment & next to nothing on nuclear doctrine & operations. A lot of the PLARF weaknesses cited by WSJ (e.g. the vulnerability of SSBNs) are of little relevance in the context of the PLA's "minimal deterrence" doctrine - meaning that it doesn't plan to attempt any surprise attacks (i.e. 1st strike) on an adversary, & it only has to respond w/ a sufficiently devastating counterattack to any enemy 1st strike attempt. That's why it has never built & doesn't need to build anywhere near as big of an arsenal as that of the US. Even if a portion of the PLARF's arsenal is neutralized in an enemy 1st strike, it will still have enough left to destroy enough enemy population centers in a counterstrike to ensure MAD. This is the rationale behind the DF-41 silos. Even if about a quarter of the 300+ silos are filled with MIRV'd DF-41 ICBMs, those silos alone be more than enough to make a US first strike impossible, regardless of how "stealthy" the Columbia SSBNs might be.
Their nuclear ability is only designated to prevent US from interfering the last chapter of Chinese civil war (i.e. Taiwan)
@@hyy3657 oh that won't stop us from intervening over Taiwan.
@FD&BJ so what 🤷🏻♂️
@@hyy3657 即使进行核战我们也要统一台湾，美国佬。
@@beastmode8203they wont need to attack taiwan, the us will collapse when the dollar collapse and their allies jump ship one by one, japan is now buying russian oil at full price, and france is selling oil in yuan same saudis, spain and hungary presidents are visiting china for talks, eventually only the uk will be your ally
The WSJ forgot to compare how many balloons the two country has.
😁😁🤭
😂😂😂😂
It's a wonderful content by WSJ but the hard fact is you cannot compare nuclear power of two countries by equipments, once a Country is Nuclear State then no country can ever dream of military conflict with it like for example US has World Strongest Military Force but US can even not dare to think of invading North Korea.
US has World Strongest Military Force. HAHAHAHAHA Not any more.
N Korea’s pursuit of its own nuclear deterrent has certainly kept the CIA out.
@@symonsmith3497 You saying it doesn’t? Even China doesn’t dare claim to be above the US in capabilities. They simply claim they are the leading military power in the indopacific.
@@symonsmith3497You're dreaming.. The biggest air force in the world is US Air Force, and second biggest air force in the world is the US Navy. The USD is the reserve currency of the world, and its the US's responsibility to police their money.
@TGWDT Do you know what defines a superpower?
With Enough Fallout There Are No Winners Or Losers
There is sure to be losers.
@@jack99889988 Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Chernobyl
Except, US politicians will be safe inside a nuclear bunker with enough food and water for at least a decade.
A salted bomb, a nuclear weapon designed to function as a radiological weapon, producing enhanced quantities of radioactive fallout, rendering a large area uninhabitable. A fallout shelter would be useless because the radiation would last hundred of years. A losing country would threaten to use such a doomsday weapon.
USA defence budget is mora than India, China, Russia combined.
购买力呢？🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@GodsDad98 still much higher because China fakes their GDP numbers. Why are you even on youtube? I'm going to tell the CCP and have you disappeared😁😆
@@GodsDad98 how many times china colonized by foreign countries?
China exerts influence via economics. The US exerts influence via wars and coups.
@@halfevilhalfgood2206 Whole of China? Twice, once by Mongols - Yuan, once by Manchus - Qing.
Showing a shadow of a Yak-130 (A Russian jet trainer and Attack aircraft) to illustrate the H-20 bomber 😂 Nice job WSJ !
BTW ! H-20 is rumoured to be just like the stealth flying wing B-2, perhaps a copy. Which could replace the old H-6s
H-20 has been rumored to be many things for almost 20 years now. I'll believe it when I see it.
@xiaomeinv7是20不符合军方要求，回去改了
J20 与747都有机翼和机身，外形相似度70%，又是复制品
How can you blame the Chinese? If a country builds a bunch of military bases around the US, an arms buildup is inevitable.
Lol 😂China has horrible relations with its neighbors not just the US. Also the CCP has a horrible history with human rights violations. US isn’t perfect but it’s ALOT better than communism. Go research the crimes committed by the CCP and appreciate your first world democracy
@@RiseSun3 You can talk about how good the relations between the US and its neighbors are. Talking about human rights, you can also tell me how the US got its land from Native Americans, how the heck did Native Americans, the owners of the American Continent, become the minority group of this land?
@@cowholy3031 many nations have annexed lands throughout history. For example, China annexed Tibet, and Russia annexed the whole of Siberia, which was originally inhabited by native peoples.
@@tluangasailo3663 history told US nations only thirteen states.. coboy expanded
@@tluangasailo3663 When China owned Tibet, the United States and India were not yet established. In addition, India annexed Bangladesh, Andaman-Nicoba Islands, Kashmir, Ladak, Sikkim, northwestern Myanmar, Goa ...
I think it’s a US mentality that some things are only allowed by the U.S. and can only be done by the U.S. No other countries are allowed to do so. Thus, whenever any other country comes even close to the U.S., they would take it as a threat.
People trust the US. People don't trust China 🤡
Theres no way you're defending nuclear expansion..........
Yeah so by your logic is we should all horde weapons and threaten to kill each other cause someone else does. Sounds like the pro gun argument. That’s going really well in the US. No shootings at all lol 😅
@@wiktorjachyra1869 No need at all to defend nuclear expansion, the other way, denuclearization should be a global effort. NO ONE should have these weapons, including the U.S.. We will only evolve as a species when we stop this idiotic notion of wanting to attack each other and holding weapons like that as "deterrents".
It is natural for all great powers not just US. If India starts to match China powers then China also take India as a threat and so on.
Thank you WSJ for producing quality content.
China is a country with sea and road-based mid-course anti-missiles.
There are 30,000 kilometers of underground nuclear facilities.
Because China was under the nuclear threat of the United States and the Soviet Union. (There are specific attack cities and how many nuclear bombs are assigned to each city)
In the west it's a Dog Eye See Man kind of world that's why!
Here is my analogy of this, two guys standing in a gas tanker bragging who has the most matches
网络与键盘不需要和平兄弟。
Carl Sagan said the nuclear arms race is like two guys standing waist deep in gasoline, one guy has three matches, the other has five
Scary time we are living in. I hope these will not be used 😭
I hope we have one
@@draker769 where are you from. Having nuclear weapons is not a good thing for most countries. Once you have that nuclear weapons you will be targeted
@@thisiscarl7622 Vietnam, a country with nuke are not going to be threatened with invasion
They will be used and it will be soon.
And once.its used.... There's when we will see Jesus coming , The end time
Its so disappointing that after all these years of fighting and killing each other for a piece of land. And now we face a wipe of the human race because of a piece of land, which we will probably destroy in the process too. no hope.
Not just a piece of land, it's a piece of ocean as well
@@我爱您中国 you are right, now that it’s also a piece of ocean it’s worth it
Seriously WSJ, big point missed. No mention of hypersonic missiles, arguably one of China's bigger strengths and an area where they lead the Americans.
ICMBs are hypersonic on the terminal flight path, nothing new
Hypersonics are still to be seen because they solve a problem that really isn’t a problem in the current world.
Left out Americas stockpile of 3,750 Nuclear Warheads.
If they bring up the topic of hypersonic missiles, they will have to discuss the upcoming battalions of US hypersonic missiles, which are all more advanced than the Chinese ones, for example US already have multiple successful tests on scramjet hypersonics , a feat China haven't yet able to do so, a scramjet are far advanced than the current Chinese hypersonic
@@tluangasailo3663 Dont you know that project was cancelled?
We just survived a plague and now people want to fight a nuke war🙄
US wants to show its muscle, does not care about its people!!!
Great report, but @ [6:54], I think the narrator may have confused the words "deploy," "employ," and "launch."
WSJ can get photos of China’s nuclear silos, but China has to use balloons!?? 😂
你好五毛. 你叫什么名字
balloons are much cheaper
😁They are having protests all over the country because they took away the health care benefits from their elderly retired people. They spent all their money on balloons😂
@@deebil8099 They are out of money. All numbers CCP displays to the world are fake, it is a Ponzi Scheme decrepit economy, so it is natural the madness of their dictators spending everything in warmongering and nonsensical balloons while people suffer and starve.
@@FlambartPhotography Yea, I know. Their real GDP numbers are at least 30% lower than what they claim. They have been pumping up their GDP by building ghost cities and bridges to nowhere and not writing off that as bad debt. Now they are running out of debt and their economy is going to collapse.
3 more important factor is ignored here.
1. Anti Ballistic missile defence, the nukes has to reach its target to be effective.
2. Hypersonic nukes, is a sure thing.
3. Satellite guidance and surveillance capabilities, how resilient and how dependable are they during wartime.
ballistic missiles are technically hypersonic, the MIRVs reentering the atmosphere can travel up to mach 7. when people are talking about hypersonic missiles, they typically think of scramjet missiles that go above mach 5 but they forget ballistic missiles are hypersonic so technically the first hypersonic missiles were the early ballistic missiles made by the germans in the 1940s
ballistic missiles dont have to rely on satellite guidance, the nuclear missiles can be guided using active radar homing, semi-active radar homing, passive radiation homing, infrared homing, laser guidance, and coordinate and gps guidance which is the common
@@OscarZheng50The chinese hypersonic missiles maneuvered...unlike a ballistic missiles.. whose course can be plotted and intercepted....that's the difference! They tested..sending a hypersonic..vessel..the circled..the earth..then dis charge a load,..America's missiles shield...do not face South ( because..no ballistic missiles hv the range to come from the south...)
Anti ballistic missile defence are a joke. They are not really effective at all. Especially vis a vis ICBMs.
All nukes are hypersonic by defintion. Including the Minuteman III and Trident 2 at Mach 24.
Maybe the concept of a nuclear 'triad' ought to be revised for the modern strategic nuclear reality/capacities, etc, as in, the cold war paradigm of ICBMs, SLBMs, and strategic bombers doesn't really reflect the current strategic arsenals of the world's nuclear powers... Which have some qualitatively different systems that some nations field, including:
-the old triad' of ICBMs, SLBMs, and conventional bombers, AND:
-road mobile ICBMs (as well as strategic cruise missiles like the GLCM 'Glick-um' which was deployed in Europe near the end of the Cold War, and which some analysts considered a strategic checkmate vs the USSR-, and helped end the 4 decades of MAD),
-manuverable hypersonic missiles/glide vehicles,
-stealth (as opposed to conventional) bombers,
-maybe even space-based weapons (currently restricted by treaty, but who knows?)
-doomsday weapons like Russia's Poisiden '100 megaton' autonomous nuclear powered UUV,
-and, (I hope not) something like a cobalt 60 doomsday nuke...
At least the U.S. backed away from such doomsday weapons like FOBS, EMP nukes, and the SLAM nuclear powered hypersonic radiation-spewing multi warhead cruise missile, in the 60s! Maybe others will (other than Russia, apparently! China has demonstrated a FOBS capability, BTW, which is qualitatively different and much more threatening/hard to detect and counter than 'normal' ICBMs...)
Thoughts 🤔?
Do you really think the US backed away from developing those weapons? Who knows what the US truly has in its arsenals? What's sure is that they will have multiple trump cards and weapons that are hidden from the public.
Thank God for Mother Russia and Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin and China, Iran and North Korea!
I love the Chinese people and their culture
👍👍👍👍👍
tell that to rohingyas, tibetans
what culture is left in China?
You can bet the United States has space based nukes.
funny thing about that: crashing things from orbital speeds actually does comparable damage to a nuke, no warhead needed.
The more important question is how China + Russia match up.
They will end up killing each other
They will fight each other's if not for US...lol
Russia is far ahead in Missile systems than US. China has to catch up to US. US has to catch up to Russian missile systems.
@@donquixote956 sure. ok :D
Russia cannot even match Ukraine hahahaha
Edward Kennedy said about nuclear arms race , " We are like a bunch of guys standing in a pool of petrol arguing how many matches each has".
The only thing to truly unite humanity if only for a time would be an external common enemy. But any external common enemy is leagues ahead of us. But in house squabbling isn't helping us.
More than military capabilities, I am concerned that USA is loosing the edge in science abs technology. Once that happens, you will see the reflection of that in military as well as economic capabilities.
I'm more worried about the malware and viruses they have lying dormant in our computer systems than their weapons.
The US keeps their technology classified. China enjoys bragging and showing off all of their technology. Anyone who brags about something is insecure about that thing. The powerful people don't need to brag.
It is awful to live in a time where a few crazy men have the power to end everything.
hahhaa i think the US would win over China? How many would like to see China vs USA at war? Please put your comments below. or USA/NATO vs RUSSIA. As I understand, China will build many new houses on MARS.
You should be lucky that there is a balance between them.
@@ThanhVu-le7ec there would be no winner. Just global destruction
If you challenge the United States Global dominance you deserve the Armageddon that comes with it.
@@puzhao1639 there is no balance.
The USA should not decrease its nuclear stockpile but increase it and make it the strongest in the world
Good, how about cutting all other budgets and increasing defense 3 folds?
Why I see so much US vs China videos recently
Per the US declaration of China as an adversary.
In media, if it bleeds it leads. It is all about attracting viewership by hype. That is one reason.
Another reason could be that main stream media is the mouthpiece of the government, and since the CHINA-US relation isn't the best now, so mainstream helping to pump the government's narrative.
The US always needs a boogeyman to drum up fear to sell weapons. Weapons is basically the only thing the US manufactures.
do you prefer india vs usa videos?
@@wenbo595 yea, something for a change, what about US vs France
Good post
i am not an expert but I have been studying Chinese military as a hobby since 2008, when their military had essentially nothing modern...to the rapid build up and explosion in military hardware and technologies in the 2010s...and I have to say that Chinese "military expert" guy is really funny, his comments are both worthless and silly at the same time, I dont think he actuallys knows anything about chinese military to be honest...anyway
I am not an expert, but this expert is wrong... What?
What is he wrong about? You should be able to clarify, not just make claims without explaining anything.
@@jeffreybongos4837 I was not replying to you.
I was asking that guy a question, because he said the "expert" is wrong.
And I'm asking why he thinks he is wrong , he should explain why he's wrong instead of making up random bs
They are self glorified imperialists ,always underestimating the lethal arm of PLA
Also experts said that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq
I don’t understand why USA can’t just allow China to own the South China Sea I don’t understand, it says China in the name. Please, USA vs China don’t happen
Bruh so with that logic India should own the Indian Ocean
Learn geography more.
🗣Frankly speaking, the point is all these superpowers having several hundred or even thousands of nuclear warheads in their arsenal is not just about deterrence anymore, but to destroy earth and human civilization instantly in a blink of eye. Let's pray that sanity and humanity can prevail in this ever-increasing complex world we live in, earth can survive in this continue senseless arms race among big powers.
Well I think China is only interested in Taiwan and does not look for confrontations with other countries but if these countries attempt to interfere in China's plans for Taiwan then China would definitely respond.
All the nations that operate in the SCS will disagree, even fisherman are no stranger to their confrontations
We will interfere.
@@beastmode8203欢迎进入21世纪
Taiwan have plans for China also. They want China to attack and fail, so that CCP will fall. And Mainland will be free again.
Oh realy? Is that why China invaded Vietnam in 1979 and the USSR in 1969, and annexed territory from Tajikistan in 2011, Kyrgyzstan in 2002 and Kazakhstan in 1998, has been annexing maritime territory from the Philippines, and currently claims to own the entire South China Sea??
Throw in Russia in the match up. Both China and Russia know fully well that if either one of them is taken down by US the remaining party will not stand a chance with US and it's pack. If China is being dragged into the cesspits then it has no incentives to take a neutral stand on the Ukraine conflicts and will then provide full logistics to Russia. US could very well regret to involve China at this stage.
China alone outnumber and outclass the entire NATO + Russia by a long shot.
China is superior in population and manpower.
China is superior in industrial output.
China is superior in infrastructure.
China is superior in missile technology.
China is superior in Naval firepower.
China is superior in logistics networks.
China is also the largest global supplier of raw material.
China is the largest trading partner of the entire Western world and Russia.
So in a sense, China can crush the West like a bug. This isn't just a speculation but a logical reasoning given the facts I put up here above.
@@ajaykumarsingh702 You could make all those points about Russia in relation to Ukraine....
China does not support Russia's aggression against Ukraine at all. If Russia thinks that Ukraine's entry into NATO is threatening itself, it should learn from the United States to engage in proxy wars, rather than end itself and occupy Ukraine's land. It is too reckless to do so in this day and age up! This will make all small and medium-sized countries worry about being annexed by big powers, and thus seek to be protected by other big powers outside the region, which is very detrimental to China's goal of ensuring the stability of its two regions, Central Asia and Southeast Asia.
Why don’t we all just get along tourist each other’s countries go on vacations and enjoy each other. We buy enough stuff from them.
网络与键盘不需要和平我的兄弟
Even with so much money, it is hard to think of a recent decisive American military victory.
Illegal wars, occupations, regime change, and proxy wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Yemen.
🤣😂facts
Conventional or unconventional warfare. What are we talking about here?
You'd have to define victory. You mean to defeat an enemy in a country on the other side of the globe, we do that pretty good. Problem comes when we occupy said country for two decades, at a certain point you lose the support of public opinion. If we were like other countries and took over and just subjugated the civilian populace, and intentionally killed unarmed civilians , yea that would make occupying countries easier but we didn't do that. Fighting wars where there aren't any actual objectives other than "occupy this space" make it impossible to have a decisive victory. America will never be invaded and taken over, if America is ever destroyed or truly defeated, the only one that I see ever able to do that is us to ourselves. If anything, a true conflict against another nation, especially a righteous one, will do nothing but finally bring the country together again.
@@nkyezlewisfulUS couldn't fully defeat North Korea when China stepped in occupying China is impossible US doesn't have the manpower for that
- 💙
"Evil triumphs when good men do nothing."
#PutinWarCriminal
Western countries has most nuclear weapons, still they're portrayed as saviours,
And they portray other aspirational countries as destroyer, we know what happened in Iraq, libiya, siriya, Vietnam.....
They are so powerful this weapons
“They launched a long-range missile,” General John Hyten, the outgoing vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff told CBS News. “It went around the world, dropped off a hypersonic glide vehicle that glided all the way back to China, that impacted a target in China.”18 Nov 2021
At what point will we realize we and our allies are the only ones in the world that follows our international laws
Who would be the winner? Can’t say. I can tell you who the loser will be, humanity
Its like strong fight between one strong man to the other strong man,
The Chinese people should know we don't have a problem with China,we want to work together in peace toward the greater good of both people.
This comment won't age well.
你的美好愿望中国人收到了😀可惜美国人并不是人人都和你一样热爱和平，可以明确的告诉你，绝大多数中国人也非常热爱和平，可惜有时候历史事件不以人的意志为转移，当你足够弱小时，某些国家就会肆无忌惮的欺凌你，你是美国人，可能你很难理解这种处境，总之，中国增强军事能力是为了和平来得更长久一些
The issuance of positive feedback
USA 🇺🇸 🌎 had done much damage 💔 to the whole world 🌎 this time 🇨🇳 China trying to do it efficiently
Nice try pak, maybe fix ur floods and famine and debt issue b4 commenting on other countries affairs...
USA: I know I have a whole bunch of advanced guns, but maybe you just take the 60s era pistol and we call it even?
China: Bruh
No mention of hypersonic missiles? Unlike ballistic missiles, these hypersonic missiles are not detectable.
It's detectable, just not fast enough for the target to react
@@Pfyzer close but no. They are very detectable, and they are actually slower than and ballistic missiles depressed trajectory, but they posses some maneuver capabilities which makes it hard for midcourse intercept
Ballistic missiles still travel many, many times faster and are almost impossible to destroy in large numbers with todays technology
joshua: shall we play a game?
For huge countries like US, China and Russia, maybe their nuclear weapons are one superior than another. But it doesn't change the fact they will endup together once the nuclear war started.
1:15 is that Winnie The Pooh in a Karate gi?
Why US wanna pick up fist with Chn? They even can't win the war against Vietnam , in Afghan US ran away and left the country to Taliban
China can't beat Vietnam in 1979, so.....
@@tluangasailo3663 us can't beat nkorea during Korea war bcoz the Chn long March with just traditional weapons
@@playerish did China&N.Korea beat S.Korea and annexed them???
@@tluangasailo3663 If you are Vietnamese. So you must have been brainwashed by your textbooks. The Chinese almost occupied your capital, but because it was a punitive war, they declared a ceasefire and returned to China
The insidious greed of men. Soon they'll take this earth to it's grave
Well well well, welcome to Second Cold War everyone
It is also a large country with a population of more than 100 million and a vast area. Now China's nuclear weapons are only a fraction of that of the United States, but four of China's neighboring countries are nuclear states (Russia, North Korea, India, Pakistan), what will happen to the United States if there are nuclear weapons around the United States? (Like Cuba?) ）
Russia (Siberia is next to Alaska), Britain and France (have territories in the Americas) are all nuclear states that are near the US.
China has more than 2,000 nuclear weapons. The United States likes to bad-mouth the number of China's nuclear weapons. China has not announced the number of nuclear weapons. In the military parade in 2019, the total number of nuclear warheads of df5b, 31a, and 41 was 300. The United States said that China has 350 nuclear warheads, which is just a joke.
May God Almighty have mercy on all the innocent people throughout the world and may God bless the United States of America.💪🇺🇸
米国。。还需要上帝来保佑嘛，玩常规游戏的话美海军可以单挑全世界海军了。
As long as Africa is not involved in this madness, I don't care what they do to each other!
Hopeless Africa is going to be colonized again by one of these two if they blow each other up. Or how else do you think they're going to re-build?
@@creative_cooper hopeless africa will have the winner for breakfast. What do you think white guy?
Why would a nation need thousands of nuclear weapons?
Their population shrunk for the first time last year and is forecasted to continue declining as time goes on. As their population shrinks, GDP shrinks, military budget shrinks, their ability to compete against the US will decline.
How about the American population? The European American population is shrinking and the Latino population is expanding so rapidly that sooner or later the president of the US will have to deliver his State of the Union address in Spanish.
The African population is growing rapidly, that must automatically mean they will be a super power with high GDP. Right?
@@npc2480 no, I was speaking specifically about China. You can’t just apply that to everyone. Africa’s agricultural land sucks and most of its rivers aren’t commercially navigable. African countries are also too fragmented and dysfunctional and unorganized to ever become super powers.
I don’t know if you deleted your reply or RUclips censored it but my comment is basically debunking the idea that population decline automatically means lower GDP. GDP can increase when people are more productive with automation and high tech industries like AI. Each person can then spend more money as they make more money by being more productive working in a high tech industry instead of blue collar work putting together iPhones on an assembly line. Also, just look at the US population and how it’s one fourth of China but has a higher GDP. This is the reason why many low paying jobs are moving out of China because wages has been slowly increasing.
Half of China’s population is still in the rural areas. That’s why there is potential for China to expand its economy. A poor farmer in China making $500 will get educated to become a doctor making $100,000.
Like how many missiles do you need like seriously.
US is jealous of China 😅
War china or usa sure China not win😅
Bcoz philippines war china Malaysia indonesia Japan India war china woe beg war
Isn't it expensive to be able to fight the entire planet? How can Americans afford this? Never mind.
Military Generals have stated this multiple times that the United States has the capability to strike anywhere on Earth from anywhere with precision.
中国也能
But failed in Afghanistan 🤷🏽♂️
@@9229Thabz the Taliban used civilians as cover so thats a different story
@@kudzaim5434 lol... Lies. Taliban was hardly operating in urban areas and were mainly out in the open areas such rural villages or hideouts in Mountains!
What about Vietnam/ Saigon. Are you going to use the same excuse?
@@9229Thabzexactly who lives in those villages aren't they civilians a precision strike on a village won't make any sense. Yes Taliban was clever for using this trick
What really matters, is that US has more to lose. Our lifestyle based on wealth & technology will cease if one city is destroyed; the following day our stock market will crash, our economy will collapse,, there will be a run on groceries, fuel, & banks; most people do not have skills to live an 1880's lifestyle. Our cities across the nation will descend into chaos.
American can't do anything else destroying countrys like Iraq Afghanistan Syria Libya...
Love u china Russia
谢谢，你来自哪里？
Republicans sent all manufacturing jobs to China and that's how we ended up paying for China's military.
I think its now the world of Hypersonic missles, people will be very scared to launch nuclear attack due to the repercussion from the other countries, but Hypersonic missles acts as a proxy tool. No defence systems will counter an hypersonic missle in the world. And also one more key difference is US won so many wars in the past and China has not won any till date. Having all the arsenal is one thing, knowing how to use if is a whole new different thing.
Take a look at what wars the United States has won in modern times, spending tens of trillions of dollars to fight countries that have no ability to fight back, burdening its own citizens with heavy debts, and making people in third world countries full of hate for the United States. China can win these wars countless times if it wants to fight ， but what's the meaningful?
🤣中国没有赢得任何战争？好好找找被藏起来的朝鲜战争和印度、越南冲突再说这话吧。
你可以怀疑中国核武器的质量，但是要是真的愚蠢到想要试试用核战争检验一下它们的效果，只能说希望你不是美国总统
*One thing I've learned in this video is how much of a threat the United States is compared to China.*
A nuclear war is inevitable! Let it rip!
Let's do usa vs Russia nuclear capabilities
The U.S. should support us the africans and help us grow, we are the future of the world sooner or later, china and russia are trying to take over africa, U.S. should not let that happen.
I mean no offense but your comment is rife with naivety. Everyone is out to help themselves and so should Africa
Let me tell you one thing. Nobody is sure who the future is!
@@blurckbud When i said the africa is the future i mean a win win situation for both africa and U.S., there's no shame about that, china are over 2 billion people working day night to get stronger army to take over the world.
Heaven helps those who help themselves
Looking at their track records, they're all merciless vultures. I want an Africa that stands on it's own because whether they like it or not the 'superpower' nations need our resources
I hope China 🇨🇳 say no to war!
new cold war
What a fun! A country with thousands of nuclear warheads is describing a country with hundreds of nuclear warheads as a threat to the world
There is a big big difference between theory and experience. China has knowledge and experience in communist rule, it's what the US doesn't have. Now China has gained knowledge and experience in western rule this is why China has an edge over the US and the rest of the west in world financial dominance notwithstanding the fact that western financial sanctions against Russia are a signal of the downfall of western dominance.
Dominance has nothing to do with it.
Sanctioning Russia was a stupid move as the West lost its credibility after that.
Now every nation is avoiding trading in Western currencies and demanding trade with their local currency.
Also no nation is depositing any of their national funds in any Western bank.
World is also opting for an alternative payment system.
And out of all this China has benefited from it the most.
Why is the U.S. & Russia limited by laws & treaty’s to not develop newer nuclear missiles but China is allowed to continue to grow their stockpile?
Why does the United States have more than 5,000 nuclear bombs and China can only have 350?
@@anindependentthinker.2156 those were built and developed back during the Cold War and world war 2 days. The US have stopped developing nuclear weapons now that we are in a modern civilized era and everyone wants world peace. In fact , the US has been dismantling most of their nuclear weapons
The United States, with thousands of nuclear warheads, accuses China, with a few hundred warheads, of continuing to develop nuclear weapons. Classic double standard.🤣
@@miaorenfeng1 most of the US nuclear weapons were developed during the Cold War and world war 2 era. The U.S. has since scaled back on developing newer nuclear warheads. They are actually dismantling some of them. So I’m surprised the world is just sitting there while China grow their stockpile
@@KCKnowsBest Two options, 1 the US reduces its nuclear warheads to the same number as China 2 China increases its nuclear warheads to the same number as the US.
Which option do you prefer?🤣
Pm go America 🇺🇸 country military 2040 fight for the right fight China country false down join Philippines to win Philippines 🇵🇭 is the most powerful country give all support for freedom and prosperity successlin that the important things especially in all the sea
you just have to drop one on Beijing and that’s it
不够，需要两颗，南极一颗，北极一颗。
那华盛顿也没了，核反击是自动的
No one can match the US Military in general atm. They are too cunning. This is not International Basketball. 😁
Hear me out; what if we used all this money to just feed people?
yeaaa... but war is more energetic
America called it "Liberation" instead of "Invasion". That was what US call it in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and the list goes on... Why the double standard? Confused... Please enlighten. Genuine question...
Instances of the United States "liberated" or overthrowing, or attempting to overthrow, a foreign government since the Second World War. (* indicates successful ouster of a government)
China 1949 to early 1960s
Albania 1949-53
East Germany 1950s
Iran 1953 *
Guatemala 1954 *
Costa Rica mid-1950s
Syria 1956-7
Egypt 1957
Indonesia 1957-8
British Guiana 1953-64 *
Iraq 1963 *
North Vietnam 1945-73
Cambodia 1955-70 *
Laos 1958 *, 1959 *, 1960 *
Ecuador 1960-63 *
Congo 1960 *
France 1965
Brazil 1962-64 *
Dominican Republic 1963 *
Cuba 1959 to present
Bolivia 1964 *
Indonesia 1965 *
Ghana 1966 *
Chile 1964-73 *
Greece 1967 *
Costa Rica 1970-71
Bolivia 1971 *
Australia 1973-75 *
Angola 1975, 1980s
Zaire 1975
Portugal 1974-76 *
Jamaica 1976-80 *
Seychelles 1979-81
Chad 1981-82 *
Grenada 1983 *
South Yemen 1982-84
Suriname 1982-84
Fiji 1987 *
Libya 1980s
Nicaragua 1981-90 *
Panama 1989 *
Bulgaria 1990 *
Albania 1991 *
Iraq 1991
Afghanistan 1980s *
Somalia 1993
Yugoslavia 1999-2000 *
Ecuador 2000 *
Afghanistan 2001 *
Venezuela 2002 *
Iraq 2003 *
Haiti 2004 *
Somalia 2007 to present
Honduras 2009 *
Libya 2011 *
Syria 2012
Ukraine 2014 *
2014 - 2022 - 6 countries yet to verify.
Pakistan 2022 *
Haiti 2022 *
Did the wsj really asked the Chinese government about the location and motivation of a nuclear silo in an specific location?
only 3 warheads hey 😂
The author has lied about the minuteman’s MIRV capabilities are it can hold 7 or 8 why lie?
Fan here in the Philippines 🌴
Instead of investing in these deadly weapons and Wars spend in making this world a better place for everyone
Just tired of these US vs China stuff. This not a movie or joke. The whole thing is just getting way out of hand. There is no winner in any conflict. Neither side is a country that can just WIN or Loose against the other.
US vs. china
Russia; hold my vlad putin.
china has df-5b and df-5c. that is a big bomb. df-5c is almost 20000km in range
If China and the U.S. did have a nuclear war 20 or 30 of China's nuclear warheads would have a devastating effect on the entire U.S. The bomb that fell on Hiroshima was a 15 -20 kiloton bomb. The warheads on our Trident missiles are 475 kilotons or 60 - 70 kilotons. I'm sure the yields of the warheads in China's nuclear arsenal are comparable. If a 500 kiloton bomb hit New York City the fireball alone would be the size of Manhattan Island. We need to start discussions on arms limitations with China. We don't need a repeat of the Cold War.
Excuse my ignorance How do you test for nuclear weapon?
The US puts out what they want us to know, no one as even come close to the B2 spirit or the F117 fighter!!
Sooner or later somebody will push the button.
The US EMPIRE is in terminal decline....
Winnie: I can has nuclear missiles?
I can Taiwan has island my nuclear?
Human don't think what these massive weapons would bring to earth but God is watching we don't know what Gods gift to us because human don't gave respect to Gods creation
why only compare Chinese war head inventory # vs U.S "operational" inventory ? what is China's operational inventory # ?
nuclear weapons, with a made in china sticker, I think I’ll pass lol
you can try.useless worm.
1:36 what would 1 of these do.damage why's