Steinhart Ocean one titanium gmt 500

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 дек 2024

Комментарии • 78

  • @davebudd1429
    @davebudd1429 3 года назад +2

    I just picked up a Steinhart Ocean One 500, not the GMT, but the regular diver. WOW, I think it is really great and amazing quality.

  • @gregburville3368
    @gregburville3368 5 лет назад +5

    Great review Bob. I have the 42mm Ocean One Titanium, and just received my new Ocean Thirty-Nine Vintage GMT. Both amazing value and quality.

  • @checksix_TC
    @checksix_TC 5 лет назад +3

    The lume on this Steinhart is crazy. It lights up brighter than a Christmas tree 🎄! The crown is buttery smooth to operate. But it scratches easily.

  • @donadoni6551
    @donadoni6551 3 года назад +8

    Hello Mister,
    Steinhart builds fantastic watches! Also this GMT is a feast for the eyes! Very well processed, sapphire crystal, Ceramic bezel in beautiful blue / black, very good clockwork, titanium case, titanium bracelet ..... and the whole for the unbeatable price !!
    A beautiful watch!
    I have to buy that ✌
    By the way, very nice video Rob 😉👍✌🥰

  • @MisterMaster4life
    @MisterMaster4life 4 года назад +3

    Good looking watch. Really tempted to buy one even though i already have 2 Gmt 42mm's. Coke on jubilee and Pepsi on oyster. Also tried a 39mm recently and those are definitely to small for my 7 3/4 wrist. So to anyone with 7 inch wrist and up i would highly recommend the 42mm. Then again, it's all about preferences.

  • @drwindsurf
    @drwindsurf 5 лет назад +2

    Thanks Rob for another excellent review...I love the lume on this one :)

  • @PT111111
    @PT111111 5 лет назад +16

    You're absolutely right Rob, if only they have the 39mm titanium!! I can wear this 42, but not with that 50mm lug to lug.

    • @PT111111
      @PT111111 5 лет назад +2

      @Cool Crush Ice Killa no, girly wrist. Lol

    • @oes2546
      @oes2546 5 лет назад +3

      @Cool Crush Ice Killa
      It's also about preference. I can pull off a 50mm+ lug to lug just fine looks-wise. But only if I didn't know better, would I consider it a comfortable/optimal fit.

    • @davidvandusen6556
      @davidvandusen6556 Год назад +2

      Good news: they make a 39mm one now :)

  • @RMA_432_
    @RMA_432_ 4 года назад

    Got mine yesterday and I absolutely love it.

  • @888fireball
    @888fireball 2 года назад

    This is a great watch. I have had one since 2020. It looks great on the wrist. I wasn’t a fan of the titanium bracelet, and replaced it with the Steinhart mesh band. This looks a whole lot better than the titanium bracelet.

    • @scarbilly
      @scarbilly Год назад

      Hi there
      Want to know does the bezel marker turn yellow on yours?

  • @softviz
    @softviz 5 лет назад +1

    Cool!♡
    Looks really good on your wrist.

  • @elarson312
    @elarson312 5 лет назад

    Really nice watch. I think the dimensions are spot on.

  • @donbateman
    @donbateman 4 года назад

    Just got mine. Love it and the size is perfect in my opinion. I have been wearing a new SMP for the last few months however. Kind of use to the 42.

  • @riocc
    @riocc 5 лет назад +2

    I really like the 39mm version of this one

  • @muffemod
    @muffemod 3 года назад +1

    I used to recommend the Tudor Pelagos, but with this it's a no brainer.

  • @TheCrispyjones
    @TheCrispyjones 4 года назад +2

    Got the non gmt version in today, vids and pics do not do justice to it, it’s a very nice piece, my second steinhart, the other is an ocean one 39 on jubilee, honestly in hand these are very nice, clasp is only weak point but it’s not awful either 😎

  • @MrRockyslegacy
    @MrRockyslegacy 5 лет назад +6

    Wish they did this in stainless steel in a 42

  • @luisruiz-rios3383
    @luisruiz-rios3383 4 года назад +3

    Hey Rob love your review, but between this Steinhart and Seiko Shogun what wuould be your choice?

  • @Lee_K_5555
    @Lee_K_5555 5 лет назад

    I was so excited when this watch was first announced that I ordered it immediately. Unfortunately it came with the dreaded misaligned GMT hand issue that plagued a number of these watches during the first production run. Steinhart quickly processed a return that was easy to execute. I do like the brand and have owned a total of six Steinharts over the years, so it was a little disappointing that this one didn't work out for me. Oh well -- you can't win them all.

  • @guylezius9775
    @guylezius9775 5 лет назад

    Cool review Rob, love Steinhart, I have 4 Ocean One’s in the 42, however Rob, that rubber strap I found to be extremely uncomfortable mate, had to take it of and bang on an after market leather strap, cheers mate. 👌👌👍👍

  • @commentjedi
    @commentjedi 5 лет назад +6

    🔥 my favorite Steinhart is the Steinhart Ocean 1, 😜
    Steinhart is Rolex improvement, not homage.

  • @johnkidd797
    @johnkidd797 2 года назад

    A GMT doesn't require a moving bezel but a dive watch does so you can set times on it. It doesn't put me off this watch as I bought one today. I will however be buying the non GMT as I have a Seiko presage sharp edge in the GMT. Arriving Tuesday is the Grand Seiko GMT chronograph, I mean if you're going to treat yourself you might as well go the whole hog.😃👍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

  • @Henrik-Pedersen
    @Henrik-Pedersen 5 лет назад +1

    Please test the new
    Ocean One 39 black ceramic

  • @Sar0
    @Sar0 3 года назад +1

    Where did you buy this watch ?
    Trying to find a reputable site

  • @blueonyx7628
    @blueonyx7628 5 лет назад +1

    Great review Rob. I have this watch and performs as well if not better than my higher end watches. It is one of my favorite in my collection. The best watch for the bucks in my opinion. It is on par with a Sinn.

  • @מוסחמוסח
    @מוסחמוסח 2 года назад

    best watch ever!!!

  • @yukonthornsaengsanoh7942
    @yukonthornsaengsanoh7942 3 года назад

    I'm considering to buy it but I'm not sure about scratch resistance when comparing with stainless steel case. Is it scratching easy? Please advise.

  • @seanfletcher6564
    @seanfletcher6564 2 года назад

    How does the titanium hold up? My understanding is that it scratches more easily.

  • @ytown4
    @ytown4 5 лет назад

    If this makes it to the Sunday sale I have a feeling it will go quicker than the Victorinox.

  • @martinduffy243
    @martinduffy243 3 года назад

    My next watch I reckon 😬

  • @reggievanness
    @reggievanness 5 лет назад

    I love this watch wow

  • @A_Dude_And_His_Watch78
    @A_Dude_And_His_Watch78 5 лет назад

    I have been staying at 40mm and under but I tried on a Pelagos 42mm titanium this past weekend and it wore really well. Also more curvature to the lugs on the Tudor, but I have the OVM 39 and am impressed with Steinhart so far. I would definitely get this in the 39mm.

  • @danailkiller
    @danailkiller 5 лет назад

    Nice preview of the watch, but which model exactly is this one? Because its almost impossible to find it on the Steinhart's website.

  • @scottsj4625
    @scottsj4625 5 лет назад +1

    I wish they made the titanium in 39 mil. I would have serious consideration for it. The 50 lug to lug is just too big for me. Cool watch though

  • @PJ-ot8eu
    @PJ-ot8eu 3 года назад

    Do you get the rubber strap as well?

  • @jamesgarthur4897
    @jamesgarthur4897 5 лет назад +4

    Many people dont like Steinhart as they think they are homage watches, personally I am a huge fan of the entire Steinhart range of watches. The quality is exceptional on these watches for the price with ETA movements.

    • @kbeightyseven1783
      @kbeightyseven1783 5 лет назад

      Think they are homage? They Are homage, they started out as making replicas, and this is a homage submariner case/bezel

  • @Thewolfamongus74
    @Thewolfamongus74 4 года назад

    Hey Rob, because this watch is titanium is it antimagnetic?

  • @dirkwerning6275
    @dirkwerning6275 5 лет назад

    Love it.

  • @Sn-tk8rq
    @Sn-tk8rq 5 лет назад +1

    I got the non titanium 39mm and love it, but don't care for the display case.

  • @Yeahpuh
    @Yeahpuh 5 лет назад

    Nice piece

  • @Gio-nl7eg
    @Gio-nl7eg 2 года назад

    Do they make it this size in normal stainless steel? I personally dislike when a watch has no weight

    • @RandomRobReviews
      @RandomRobReviews  2 года назад

      Steinhart has many models many sizes

    • @Gio-nl7eg
      @Gio-nl7eg 2 года назад

      @@RandomRobReviews awesome ill buy the stainless steel version that’s this size then sometime thanks 🙏🏽

  • @1vjbknife
    @1vjbknife 3 года назад

    Does anyone know how big of a wrist this watch will fit with the links that are supplied with it?

  • @KN0W3LL
    @KN0W3LL 5 лет назад

    How does the titanium finish hold up to scratches compared to the stainless?

    • @J.Bradley.
      @J.Bradley. 5 лет назад

      Scratches easier but it's easier to fix and you can do it yourself. Videos online. Holds up to saltwater.

  • @khronokraze
    @khronokraze 5 лет назад

    I've owned this Watch twice. It is a very good watch. But, if I'm being honest, I really didn't notice that much of a difference in weight with the titanium on this model compared to a stainless steel ocean 1 and 42 mm. Additionally oh, I really cannot get over the fact that the watch has inconsistent finishes and tones of titanium. The case and bracelet are pretty close but not perfectly matched. But, I find the worst offense in the clasp. I really do not understand why it is not rushed like the rest of the watch and it is Ashley significantly darker than the rest of the watch as well. I will say this part of the watch I do feel the titanium and it is super light. But, if you was a little too light and Ashley fuse kind of cheap because of that. I much prefer the 39mm version because the street loves are live it more manageable on my just under 7 inch wrist. I appreciate the weight of stainless steel more , and the stainless steel is easier to match with other hardware of aftermarket straps. Something about the dull grey titanium color and finish are less accommodating than the 39mm stainless steel version. That's the way I feel about it.
    I will agree this is probably steinhart best looking watch that's more original than not. The colors are excellent and the lume is pretty damn good too. and the price you can get them for with everything that you get including a display case back decorated movement and 500 meters water resistance is pretty good as well

    • @dylanharrington744
      @dylanharrington744 5 лет назад

      Khrono Kraze I agree with you on the colour of the titanium, but who is Ashley?

    • @khronokraze
      @khronokraze 5 лет назад

      @@dylanharrington744 lol. My speech to text on my phone sucks. The word I was trying to say was "actually. Anyways dot-dot-dot

    • @khronokraze
      @khronokraze 5 лет назад

      See, there it goes again

  • @J.Bradley.
    @J.Bradley. 5 лет назад

    I feel they couldve done a little better on the edges, they are sharp. Not a deal breaker.

  • @kbeightyseven1783
    @kbeightyseven1783 5 лет назад +3

    I just want to say I do not recommend steinhart, I received a ocean one with a faulty crown, which showed that there is little to no qc, the worst part was that steinhart ignored my emails for 3 weeks then when they did reply they told me I had to send it back to Germany at my cost for repair, not a replacement but repair, my example was poor and the customer service was even worse

    • @TONY_FEZ
      @TONY_FEZ 4 года назад +3

      That's not good! Funny how something like that can put you off a brand forever. I bought a new Oris Aquis on which the crown stem popped out within the first few days of ownership. Oris wanted to send it off for repair quoting a 6-8 week turn around. Thankfully I paid for it via Paypal who forced the seller to refund my money. Oris was
      TOTALLY were uninterested in helping me. I'd never touch the brand again. Have owned 5 or 6 Steinharts though, which have all been great.

  • @steveholaday3551
    @steveholaday3551 5 лет назад +3

    If you sell it I want it!!!

  • @joekelly9369
    @joekelly9369 3 года назад

    Most dive watches are one direction so they dont rotate during a dive ,

    • @RandomRobReviews
      @RandomRobReviews  3 года назад

      Correct, this is a dual time bezel, not dive bezel

  • @gellendkspeor8992
    @gellendkspeor8992 5 лет назад

    can i know about this referenve number?

  • @Chris09978
    @Chris09978 4 года назад

    Could you fit a 24 mm band on this model cause I saw a band on there website that has a 24/22mm size band which I have no idea what that means does it mean that it could fit lugs between 24 and 22 or completely different

  • @Sn-tk8rq
    @Sn-tk8rq 5 лет назад +1

    I agree. Bezel should have been bidirectional, that is definitely a negative and a poor choice.

  • @largecarken8504
    @largecarken8504 5 лет назад +1

    Rolex homage!

    • @RandomRobReviews
      @RandomRobReviews  5 лет назад +4

      Have not seen a Rolex like this, what model?

    • @largecarken8504
      @largecarken8504 5 лет назад +4

      It’s not exact but definitely the people the like the Rolex GMT-MASTER II will see this as a look a like alternative.

  • @HighTower2.0
    @HighTower2.0 4 года назад +2

    "I'm just wearing bigger watches right now" I'm 6ft9, 260. I'll always be wearing a bigger watch... I've realised through watching these videos theres a lot of guys with girly wrists who cant even wear a 42.

  • @Jaycelestra
    @Jaycelestra 5 лет назад +1

    Doesn’t look original imo..

  • @bemil
    @bemil 5 лет назад

    Looks almost like plastic on video 😅

  • @markschumacher6630
    @markschumacher6630 5 лет назад +2

    Overpriced by $400.00.

    • @Mark-sd7fc
      @Mark-sd7fc 4 года назад +3

      That just ridiculous

  • @grantdavidphilpot9454
    @grantdavidphilpot9454 5 лет назад

    Cheap get diamond studded

  • @ivankerr3570
    @ivankerr3570 5 лет назад

    Dislike titanium . The 39mm ss is much nicer