How to Properly MONITOR and DELIVER Anamorphic Footage

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 45

  • @omenka
    @omenka 9 дней назад

    Great video! But if you want to present your widescreen film on a cinema screen, I would always deliver your film as a scope 2.39:1 DCP as most cinemas use a wider screen. If delivered in a flat DCP, which is always 1.85:1, your film would be in pillar and letterbox format, so delivering in 2.39:1 is often a better choice for cinema submissions.

  • @patrickthornton4673
    @patrickthornton4673 Год назад +1

    Thank you

  • @walidaltinawi
    @walidaltinawi Год назад +2

    Amazing job Julien! Thank you so much for making this video; and all the other videos in this series. Please, keep them coming!

  • @immarcusgram
    @immarcusgram Год назад +1

    Was just thinking about whether to deliver in 16:9 or 2.93:1 but delivering in 16:9 makes more sense! Great video!

  • @WillHsuAerial
    @WillHsuAerial Год назад +1

    Thanks Julien! I'm new to anamorphic and this video helps a lot!

  • @SNXMD
    @SNXMD Год назад +3

    Really awesome vid! What model SmallHD is that?

  • @dieselboy60
    @dieselboy60 Год назад +1

    Love this breakdown with the SmallHD. Slightly unrelated question: What is the riser/high hat that you've got built into your table - I'm looking to do the exact same thing.

    • @julienajarry
      @julienajarry  Год назад +1

      Hey thanks! It’s a Vinten highhat.

  • @sutren
    @sutren Месяц назад

    Thanks man

  • @krisjenk
    @krisjenk Год назад +1

    Nice one Julien, looking forward to using those steps on my Cine 5!

  • @tonitarifavideoproduction
    @tonitarifavideoproduction Месяц назад +1

    Hi,
    Thank you for your videos! I wanted to ask, if you were to choose your first anamorphic lens for the Sony a7Siii, which one would you pick?
    Best regards,

    • @julienajarry
      @julienajarry  Месяц назад +1

      The Aivascope 1.5 or 1.7x Amber flare adapter. And I’d run it on a Leica R 60mm f2.8 macro lens.

  • @EagleTastic
    @EagleTastic Год назад

    Thanks for a great easily understood video. I just bought my first anamorphic lens which I'm excited to start using but I really didn't understand what steps in post was required until now. Also thanks for explaing the monitor display settings.

  • @aLgProduction
    @aLgProduction Год назад +1

    That was a great lesson. Thanks for sharing.

  • @georgeblanchardjr
    @georgeblanchardjr Год назад +1

    Very informative.

  • @AntonioDiCaterina
    @AntonioDiCaterina Год назад +1

    Such good info, really no other video out there with this info🙌

  • @joenicklo
    @joenicklo Год назад +1

    Very surprised the FX6 doesn't have anamorphic support to de-squeeze in camera. Unrelated: I'd love to see a video from you on how you monitor focus with the Indie 7 and other Small HD displays. I've found that the Small HD focus assist isn't as....accurate (maybe not the right word) as the Atomos monitors.

    • @julienajarry
      @julienajarry  Год назад +1

      Hey thanks for the comment. Although it would be nice if all cameras could desqueeze in-camera but as I eluded to in the video, a lot of times we want all sorts of flavors of something and that would be challenging to offer. Take the Venice for example: It has an anamorphic mode, a license that costs $4000+. It only enables 4k windows of the full frame sensor therefore, I'm not using it. I'm doing it manually as you can see. Focus: Believe it or not, I rarely use focus peaking and haven't for years. I focus by eye mostly on the Cine 7. That being said, I have had to pull focus and set up peaking on SmallHD monitors and I know what you're saying. I found great success experimenting with the focus assist values. It took a bit of trial and error but I got it. I'd share those settings with you now if I could.

  • @akcine
    @akcine Год назад +1

    GREAT! Thanks

  • @gife8529
    @gife8529 Год назад +1

    There are a new firmware update on fx6 that we can use de-squeeze ? right ?

  • @stucooke3983
    @stucooke3983 9 месяцев назад +1

    I'm curious on the letterboxing decision. You mention that there is little to stop someone from displaying the footage incorrectly and cutting off the sides when displaying...but any digital display device will automatically add a letterbox if the file dimensions are say, 2:1, on a 16x9 display. Have you encountered a client or someone actually cropping into your image to display it incorrectly? This is crazy to me. I've always just created the aspect ratio within the NLE itself and never had an issue. The device that is displaying the content will automatically use the best available space to show the file, regardless of aspect ratio.

    • @julienajarry
      @julienajarry  7 месяцев назад

      Not all avenues will do what you say. RUclips didn’t used to support 2.39:1. They’d crop it to 16:9. Event spaces, etc. Letterboxes are dummy proof.

  • @Sickworldpodcast
    @Sickworldpodcast 6 месяцев назад +1

    So I need a monitor? I have a Sirui on my Sony 6400 and I can’t get it to look like anamorphic

  • @underratedfilmz8385
    @underratedfilmz8385 Год назад +2

    What monitor is that!?

  • @jeffhalligan1196
    @jeffhalligan1196 10 месяцев назад

    What smallhd are you running on your set up here?

  • @yourtv2711
    @yourtv2711 Год назад +1

    Detail which most of the videos don't have

  • @lildirtyP
    @lildirtyP Год назад +1

    great video. thanks dude!