one side note: as a sci. researcher, one needs to constantly be looking for new ways, innovative ways to transmit, to communicate his/her science and sci. researcher results. Any other way, it will become something else, it will become something more close to a framework, a normative, a cheat list at the end. And when that happens, there's a machine that is more capable of doing it better, faster, and with less error. It has many names, one known by the name "computer". Learning how to avoid standardization at work is now the safest route to a happier life, now the route to better productivity and better work results. #DIY
Excellent presentation. But if the discussion preceds the introduction and literature review, then what would be its basis? I think we need to emphasize more on the iteration than a rigid flow.
When Im writing İt is very hard for me to cite. For example, I read a review that collects every parts of papers properly. I think that if I screen the literature I ll find the same information. İt is better to change the words by paraphrasig and citing the same papers that I read from review. It is time consuming, scientists say “ go to main first source= primary source, maybe the review that you read understand wrongly” but I think it is a low probability, What if I read and cite from the same review? Instead of reading the whole papers, I can look for the other papers. Thank you in advance
![Writing a journal paper [SUB: EN]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/h4YyoRhRGcQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![Writing a journal paper [SUB: EN]](/img/tr.png)
![Foundation of Scientific Writing [SUB EN]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Mrvsd138yXE/mqdefault.jpg)
one side note: as a sci. researcher, one needs to constantly be looking for new ways, innovative ways to transmit, to communicate his/her science and sci. researcher results. Any other way, it will become something else, it will become something more close to a framework, a normative, a cheat list at the end. And when that happens, there's a machine that is more capable of doing it better, faster, and with less error. It has many names, one known by the name "computer". Learning how to avoid standardization at work is now the safest route to a happier life, now the route to better productivity and better work results. #DIY
Very Informative and Useful to researcher community
I'm really liking this video. Keep it up !
thanks so much dr. shady
Very useful explanation.thank you
Excellent , thank you for sharing
Thanks Professor. Your videos are helping me with writing both my dissertation proposal and first manuscript.
Excellent presentation. But if the discussion preceds the introduction and literature review, then what would be its basis? I think we need to emphasize more on the iteration than a rigid flow.
Thanks allotted for this presentation really it is very important, if possible to share us PowerPoint bcz examples not clear in presentation
Many thanks
No worries!
Great work as usual, many thanks Prof Shady.
Thanks ... very intersting
i deeply understood to your lectures ,thanks alot
Great videos
Please give one lecture on how to write a qualitative research paper
Thanks
Wonderfull
When Im writing İt is very hard for me to cite. For example, I read a review that collects every parts of papers properly. I think that if I screen the literature I ll find the same information. İt is better to change the words by paraphrasig and citing the same papers that I read from review. It is time consuming, scientists say “ go to main first source= primary source, maybe the review that you read understand wrongly” but I think it is a low probability,
What if I read and cite from the same review? Instead of reading the whole papers, I can look for the other papers.
Thank you in advance
if i have two short sentences which are cited from one paper, should i merge them to one sentences or put two separate citation ?
awesome bro
Thanks u Prof
Why is it so hard to read slides
Video link please...
Can I get PPT