Interesting. It is really indepth and usefull. superv presentation style, good outlooking, clear voice and accent. I find this presentation very usefull for my publication.👍
This presentation is very resourceful, insightful and comprehensive enough for 'one' to confidently approach publishing. It is tough to admit but it has demystified the process in a manner far more articulately than the lectures I attended during my studies. Thank you Dr. Clare Llewellyn, You are a great inspiration.
Dear Jacob, here is a video which shows how a author can analyze how their work is cited: ruclips.net/video/r0Drhb_sr3Y/видео.html in addition here is another video discussing the most important part of a publication: ruclips.net/video/5m92HEmyZa4/видео.html
Excellent presentation that makes an important point about knowing all the factors that determine whether a paper is accepted or rejected. If you don't know or understand the criteria by which your manuscript will be judged, your chances of success are greatly diminished. It's especially important for early career researchers to know these criteria and actively address them when writing their papers for publication.
This presentation is awesome. It is almost 5 years down the line and it's still relevant now. Thanks to the EASO and the presenter for such an amazing presentation. I'm going to publish a lot of high impact factor papers with this information at my disposal
Clear and very detailed. Thank you for the advice on writing a title and outlining that it should be nice and short avoiding prepositions or unnecessary words
It is really indepth and usefull. superv presentation style, good outlooking, clear voice and accent. I find this presentation very usefull for my publication
An extremely helpful presentation. Thank you. On correct writing. In my own field (electrical power delivery), if I find a single mistake, I stop reading. Forty years of experience have taught me that the ability to write is correlated with the ability to think. Though not perfect, the correlation is strong enough to have been a useful guide in my efforts to make my work as beneficial as possible.
"if there is even some typo in the paper, I would reject it straight away." I agree it should not be horribly written, but I think it is some biasness for researchers whose first language is not English. It makes lots of difference how you express it, which should not happen for technical research. After all, are you going to read/expect an English literature essay/Novel or a scientific research paper with data and findings? I think editor with that mentality is making it a lot difficult for especially researchers and universities from Asia, Africa, South America. The language was supposed to be just a medium of expression. But has not been so as speaker divulged(she must be an editor in some journal as well) and many good papers rejected just because of reviewer not liking the language or command on "English" language. I don't know how it is not racism or biases in terms of language? Language overweighting the facts. Sadly, which has been widespread in the field of "academic" intellectuals as well.
Mr Frank I agree with you. One of my friend who is specialised in linguistics was mentioning that any ENGLISH is ok as per past research in social sciences and humanities. It's only in recent times that every journal is looking for polished way and are rejecting for typo errors. Luckily my reviewers have been kind enough to point those mistakes as happens due to oversight, and my editor suggested to change certain things in low tone. I know everybody won't be like that.. So, nowadays it's more of cosmetic stuff rather than natural... So with journals and publications...
I published one article in Journal of American Academic Research in California, USA and I want to publish my dissertation as a book next year. After these 2 steps, I will consider most highly-impacted journal to publish such as Nature, Springer, Science, etc.
thank you so much. I just changed my article title and abstract after watching what you proposed it to be. but I dont agree on inviting a native co author and having no typo, this is sort of insulting to non-native speakers. Humans make mistake and our knowledge of English language and its vocabulary is not always perfect and stable. We forget certains things and learn new ones as life goes by depending on how much we are interacting in a particular language. THE MOST DECISIVE criteria shall be the results and findings of a research.
She must be referring to Gemini Study. Her profile says she is the Director of the Gemini Study, a large population-based British birth cohort of twins set up to study genetic and environmental influences on early life growth.
This is all great but for a great chance of publishing a manuscript you need a combination of good writing and scientific revision. There are good companies like manuscriptbuilder, editage, etc which can do this. I guess it is all depends how fast and higher impact you want to go.
I see a little bit of racism here regarding the absolutely no typos in the initial manuscript submitted to the journal. Not everyone's first language is English and Racism is not just the matter of inequality between black and white people, it happens in many forms and this is I believe one of them
Impact is damage, you want effect. English is a language, not a game. ☆ What happens if one simply has something novel to offer for assessment? After eight years, nothing.
If you address the cover letter to the editor-in-chief you are very likely to get it wrong. It almost never gets to her/him, at least at the beginning. I don't think it's that bad though.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Interesting. It is really indepth and usefull. superv presentation style, good outlooking, clear voice and accent. I find this presentation very usefull for my publication.👍
This presentation is very resourceful, insightful and comprehensive enough for 'one' to confidently approach publishing. It is tough to admit but it has demystified the process in a manner far more articulately than the lectures I attended during my studies.
Thank you Dr. Clare Llewellyn, You are a great inspiration.
Dear Jacob,
here is a video which shows how a author can analyze how their work is cited:
ruclips.net/video/r0Drhb_sr3Y/видео.html
in addition here is another video discussing the most important part of a publication:
ruclips.net/video/5m92HEmyZa4/видео.html
Excellent presentation that makes an important point about knowing all the factors that determine whether a paper is accepted or rejected. If you don't know or understand the criteria by which your manuscript will be judged, your chances of success are greatly diminished. It's especially important for early career researchers to know these criteria and actively address them when writing their papers for publication.
Can help me how t get more informatiom in publication and soo..on
This presentation is awesome. It is almost 5 years down the line and it's still relevant now. Thanks to the EASO and the presenter for such an amazing presentation. I'm going to publish a lot of high impact factor papers with this information at my disposal
Clear and very detailed. Thank you for the advice on writing a title and outlining that it should be nice and short avoiding prepositions or unnecessary words
It is really indepth and usefull. superv presentation style, good outlooking, clear voice and accent. I find this presentation very usefull for my publication
An extremely helpful presentation. Thank you.
On correct writing. In my own field (electrical power delivery), if I find a single mistake, I stop reading. Forty years of experience have taught me that the ability to write is correlated with the ability to think. Though not perfect, the correlation is strong enough to have been a useful guide in my efforts to make my work as beneficial as possible.
Dear Clare Llewellyn, Thanks for awesome talk
Very Brilliant presentation, every minute of it was so helpful.
Absolutely amazing ... Many thanks, Dr
Amazing presentation. It really shows how much work goes into publishing a paper
Thanks so much for information... Very useful and educative...
"if there is even some typo in the paper, I would reject it straight away."
I agree it should not be horribly written, but I think it is some biasness for researchers whose first language is not English. It makes lots of difference how you express it, which should not happen for technical research.
After all, are you going to read/expect an English literature essay/Novel or a scientific research paper with data and findings? I think editor with that mentality is making it a lot difficult for especially researchers and universities from Asia, Africa, South America. The language was supposed to be just a medium of expression. But has not been so as speaker divulged(she must be an editor in some journal as well) and many good papers rejected just because of reviewer not liking the language or command on "English" language. I don't know how it is not racism or biases in terms of language? Language overweighting the facts. Sadly, which has been widespread in the field of "academic" intellectuals as well.
Mr Frank I agree with you. One of my friend who is specialised in linguistics was mentioning that any ENGLISH is ok as per past research in social sciences and humanities. It's only in recent times that every journal is looking for polished way and are rejecting for typo errors. Luckily my reviewers have been kind enough to point those mistakes as happens due to oversight, and my editor suggested to change certain things in low tone. I know everybody won't be like that.. So, nowadays it's more of cosmetic stuff rather than natural... So with journals and publications...
Has she never heard of proof edits?
Very true. I'm not sure if it's coincidence or not, but such standards seem to be imposed by monolingual institutions or individuals.
Agreed. It's even more: It's dismissing a paper that might be really good in aspects that matter. A really weird weighting of criteria.
Exactly. It's so weird that you'd dismiss something because it doesn't fit your standards of language.
Very Brilliant presentation, Thanks for a detail information
I published one article in Journal of American Academic Research in California, USA and I want to publish my dissertation as a book next year.
After these 2 steps, I will consider most highly-impacted journal to publish such as Nature, Springer, Science, etc.
Thanks for your recoms :)
@@merdekaagussaputra1504
You're very welcome.
Good comment, can't agree more
Thanks for sharing your experience, Coco.
I have a plan to publish too.
Thanks for sharing this and making this public.
thank you so much. I just changed my article title and abstract after watching what you proposed it to be.
but I dont agree on inviting a native co author and having no typo, this is sort of insulting to non-native speakers. Humans make mistake and our knowledge of English language and its vocabulary is not always perfect and stable. We forget certains things and learn new ones as life goes by depending on how much we are interacting in a particular language. THE MOST DECISIVE criteria shall be the results and findings of a research.
Stunning, Love it. Many Thanks
Highly informative lecture.
An awesome teaching!
Such a Wow Presentation
Hi ,do you study construction management ,i want sme help please
What is "Gemini" (sp?) to which the presenter refers at 19:38 ?
She must be referring to Gemini Study. Her profile says she is the Director of the Gemini Study, a large population-based British birth cohort of twins set up to study genetic and environmental influences on early life growth.
11:00 Site for all the metrics 11:30
21:00 El título es crucial para saber cuanto exito tendra el trabajo
Nice class
This is all great but for a great chance of publishing a manuscript you need a combination of good writing and scientific revision. There are good companies like manuscriptbuilder, editage, etc which can do this. I guess it is all depends how fast and higher impact you want to go.
27:00 Outline
Excellent
8:00 Journsls list
13:40 Top 100 papers 14:53 Estudíos de biotecnólogía han dominado los 100 mas citados
2:50 index
I find it quite funny that she gives the impact factors of the journals to the third decimal :)
Nice talk though.
polielie vd 2
I see a little bit of racism here regarding the absolutely no typos in the initial manuscript submitted to the journal. Not everyone's first language is English and Racism is not just the matter of inequality between black and white people, it happens in many forms and this is I believe one of them
Impact is damage, you want effect. English is a language, not a game. ☆ What happens if one simply has something novel to offer for assessment? After eight years, nothing.
17:30 Novelty is crucial
If you address the cover letter to the editor-in-chief you are very likely to get it wrong. It almost never gets to her/him, at least at the beginning. I don't think it's that bad though.
Doesn’t matter.
@@g0801215 I agree. Thank you for the feedback.
I would cite from a comment in reddit as long it was relevant.
🕊
Great talk, but you were lousy at listening and answering questions at end of the talk.
it is informative to some extent but the speed of the speech made it a little unbearable to hear
Ewe Anne Asmelash Eye kemey ke
OH MY GOD! She feeds abstracts to dogs!
Nope the world hasnt changed my friend
Excellent