1: This is a really good M16 prop, dayum. Thought it was Airsoft at first. 2: That's what Super Soakers and NERFs are for. NERF has an apropriatly plasticky, colourful and cartoon proportioned M16 that is still recongniseable as an AR15 thanks to the Fortnite colab.
Airsoft is designed to be almost 1 to 1, a high quality M16A1 would look even closer to the real deal than that prop, that's why hollywood uses them, if they don't need them to be shot, it both looks just right on camera, and is safer for people on set.
i didnt understand why this is a problem if the cons I go to there are a lot of people who come with guns or tactical cosplays and then I remember most of you are from the USA
I mean given how often mass shootings take place here in the US, people should really know better than to bring a prop that looks realistic (even with an orange tip).
I have to disagree with you their. Mass shooting aren't exactly that common given the fact that the US is massive and contains hundreds of millions of people. That point is mostly brought up as propaganda by one side of the political isle to push their goals, and isn't exactly grounded in reality.
Yeah, with the videos I've seen, I really had to pay attention to the vid to see the orange tip. In a crowd with a mask would make it nearly impossible to see the tip.
@@jimcobbler3954 the hotel is absolutely massive. i saw this in person, but from far away, and could not see the orange tip. had it continued much longer, i would've likely found the nearest police officer or called 911. it only takes ONE person to start panicking to cause a stampede, or to cause other people to pull out their REAL guns/other weapons.
@@protowave (Deleted reply because I finished the video and was wrong) Yeah it was neon it was just hard to see. I think the new policy is fine as long as it's enforced on fake guns that look similar enough to be a problem.
As you might relate that prop to a threat others may not. It’s a strange conversation to be had but a necessary one. If any bit of statistics would lighten your mood and dampen ur fear no mass shooting within the US has ever occurred at any sort of convention and that’s not some malarky I’m talking about over 60-70 years of all kinds of conventions held yearly or even monthly. The single one that had a mass shooting wasn’t even a convention it was a video game tournament at a convention center. (If ur interested in the name it’s the Jacksonville landing shooting and it’s a damn shame that it happened) The chances (as fuck up as saying people dying is a chance) is EXPONENTIALLY lower than dying in a car crash on the way to a convention in the first place or on the way to work. Not defending improper gun etiquette here just trying to explain that fear is very much misplaced.
Why was the gun allowed if it violates the con rules? Some consistency from FWA staff is needed here! That prop gun shouldn't have been allowed, period. Even under the older, more relaxed rules.
even so, it's extremely easy to literally just walk into the hotel through the front door without having ever registered for the convention. there's thousands of people in the lobby and nobody is going to stop you from going anywhere, really, unless it's a panel room that requires registration. so this same thing could've happened with anyone off the street, with a real or a fake gun, at any time.
I think cosplaying as a villain and pointing or even carrying a prop gun has the same effect as cosplaying as a firefighter and screaming “FIRE!!!”. In-character or not, anybody who isn’t paying 100% attention to you (which is most of the people there) will be startled by the display and may react accordingly.
As someone who had brought a bright orange and white clone trooper gun to a furry con I’d say you gotta make sure that it is obviously not a real thing!
Agreed. I don’t like the bandwagoning in the comments section. I wonder if, rather than barring realistic fake guns from cons altogether, it would be a good idea to just ban waving them around. That way you could still have them on an outfit or something, but choosing to wave it around would be risking getting booted from the con. Worst case, if people still decide to do it, they ban them altogether instead.
Its funny seeing someone I know be part of this. I'm not surprised though. its not the first time he got into trouble, the the last time was because he was trolling some undesirable people.
Plus, FWA was littered with real guns. I heard rumors of several furries that had real guns there, there were cops littering the hotel, and while FWA and the Marquis may prohibit firearms, there are other non-furry guests who may not be aware of or care about the policy. We are after in a state that is very gun friendly. I think a shooter wouldn't have a very good time there. That with that same thought in mind, Bootles point about him potentially spooking someone who is carrying and then could open fire is a valid concern.
Absolutely. I suppose that I'm a little biased being an Australian, but the idea of there being actual weapons at a con seems insane to me, but since they're there, it seems to be in poor taste to poke the proverbial bear by brandishing what very much appears to be an actual assault rifle above a large crowd. Definitely could provoke a lethal response. Thankfully not the case here but there's a valuable lesson to be learned from this. Hopefully it's taken to heart for all future events.
@@Alopexus I am australian and I disagree, having weapons makes sense, I carry weapons for self defence given my line of work and the city I am in. If con security is A+ tier, then I can understand not carrying it, and restricting arms, but given I saw little to no security patrols, if at all, I can completely get behind having people there with firearms, given some people like take their own safety into their own hands
I think it was mainly the fact that he was standing on the Pulse platform, when everyone there is, or should be, very aware of the Pulse Nightclub incident.
It had nothing to do with the Pulse platform you are one of 2 people I've seen mention this no one else cares about that they legit only care about the Prop
I think that the public reaction to this stunt is reasonable, especially given that it's likely that a large portion of the crowd might not have been aware of the fact that the gun was fake. The antifur rhetoric is just far too gung-ho about stuff like this for this to be immediately taken as a joke. People are going to assume that a gun which looks that realistic is real, and react accordingly. While the joke may have been made with no ill intent, they should have considered how it might appear to onlookers. People have tried to argue that this was "just a joke" and that the people who are complaining are just snowflakes, but that argument just doesn't hold up. It is not at all easy to tell that the gun is marked as a prop, and regardless of the police being aware of it, the congoers were not. This could easily have been mistaken for someone actually aiming a real firearm at the crowd, and I know that I personally would have panicked on initially seeing the weapon, and been highly concerned about it after noticing the orange tip, if I did notice the tip at all. This is a great example of someone not properly considering public perception when planning a stunt. They likely didn't mean any harm, but they caused harm nonetheless, and it is very important that situations like this are avoided, either by informing congoers of the presence of prop firearms at a con accompanied with a description of the weapon, or by preventing people from bringing prop firearms.
Wish I could have gone to FWA.. My cousin lives in Atlanta, I'm gonna ask him if he saw anything. Love Bomb Voyage, but he stabbed a Lethal Company employee. I guess the gun thing could definitely make people anxious.
He really was a threat! He could have easily caused a panic from the crowd or a concealed carrier could have precieved him as a threat. He put his fellow con goers at risk for a cheap stunt to get himself noticed
You must have only seen the two images news outlets want you to see. I looked him up through google search and got plenty of results of the dude chilling or joking around with other attendees. He was not a threat at all.
Bombvoyage should not gotten this much negativity. What concerns me is that the furry fandom is getting more attention from certain “news” channels and I don’t want some crazy random person do anything crazy.
Crazy things have already happened, I believe in 2014 at MFF there was a chlorine gas attack that hospitalized some people and a few cons have had threats called on em that resulted in police intervention
i don't think the lack of someone doing something weird will stop such channels from doing fear-mongering, other hobbies with large communities and minority groups have plenty of incidents to give examples on it.
9:01 this is an incredibly stupid and shortsighted “solution”. If someone wants to commit a mass atrocity, do you REALLY think that a piece of paper/statement is going to stop them from gunning down dozens of innocent people?
kinda crazy how convention staff let in an actual super villian into the convention they better train their security to better spot people who have increased chances of destroying the city
This is most ok not-ok thing I have ever seen from a furry convention. You all know what I mean. That said. As someone who was raised around guns and grew up with gun safety as a general fact of life, several not ok things happened here. 1) always treat any gun, even a prop gun, as if it is a loaded weapon (posing for pictures is ok, but pointing it into the crowd is not) 2) prop or toy guns should be very clearly marked as not real, and if it isn't clear at a glance then it is not clearly marked (it's pretty obvious how it could be mistaken for a real one) 3) the cosplayer let someone take their real looking gun away from them (people expect such items to be held by the appropriate cosplay, not by randos, so this was basically asking to cause panic) I think it'd be pretty fair to ban any realistic looking cosplay of combat/war characters and their weapons, so like a CoD cosplay. But I don't think the same should apply to well known pop culture characters, like the TF2 or Overwatch characters, as long as they *CLEARLY* mark their gear as props and don't let people run off with it.
"...so like a CoD cosplay. But I don't think the same should apply to well known pop culture characters, like the TF2 or Overwatch characters..." ... Did you forget that Ghost exists??? Or, has no one told you about him yet? This is coming from someone who *also* thinks this was handled poorly.
@@Cade_Rufus you know what no, I don't know or care wtf ever Ghost is. Now if you're done being a snob about my video game knowledge, I'd like to go back to the serious conversation that was being had.
@@graveyardshift2100 Ghost is an iconic character from CoD. He's the dude with the skull mask. and painted eyes. You must have lived under a rock for the last several years to not have even seen him on the internet. Don't call someone else a snob for calling attention to a lapse in your knowledge if you yourself are gonna act like an even bigger snob. A simple google search and a more appropriate response would have suffice
People shouldn't assume that every furry knows about all so-called "well known pop culture characters". Not all furries play video games in their spare time. I am 47 years old, and what is a "well known pop culture character" to furries of one age group, may not be equally well known to furries of another age group. I have never played TF2 or Overwatch, nor have I seen anyone play it, or talked to anyone about the games. If someone was cosplaying a character from those games, I would have no idea. It could just be a lunatic with a gun.
I'm not blamming the cosplayer for what happened, but honestly (and unfortunately) america has too many mass shootings for this to have been okay. I would have been nervous too if I had seen this. I live in Georgia and people can carry weapons here, so it wouldn't have been too much of a leap to think it was, especially for the people seeing it at a distance.
I didn't even know this was a cosplay of a character. I just thought someone was being a mime. I saw the guy earlier in the con doing mime-like shenanigans, so I was taken aback by the photo where he poses with the prop weapon as being very unbecoming of a mime, though I kind of now understand that this is part of the point of the character, I suppose. Some people still consider the cosplayer's response as a non-apology, though I think that it sounds reasonable, as well as the con's response: none of this seems to have been intentional, and everyone involved has learned a lesson.
I mean, in all fairness, the way he was carrying it would be physically impossible with an actual gun of that size due to the weight and the balance, and from the footage he seems to be avoiding putting his fingers visibly near the trigger area, but I do think the part where he was pointing it at the audience was extremely irresponsible. Personally, I don't think he should be banned, but being very firmly asked *not* to repeat this stunt lest he be banned (and permanently) seems imminently reasonable to me.
I spotted Bombvoyage at a con I attended! I was so tickled to see such a relatively obscure cosplay. I reckon they meant well, but given the country we live in, people really need to be savvy and careful about waving around realistic-looking weapons or feigning or gesturing to violent or terroristic gestures, threats, or acts.
I don’t necessarily blame the guy, but also it’s so understandable that people don’t want to see weapons, fake or not, in public. There have been many public “incidents” with weapons, and it’s much more fun to just not bring something that might make people uncomfortable or confused.
That's why you need that orange around the muzzle. That's actually one of the reasons nerf guns have the orange bits. It's to make sure it's know its not real.
Why talk about this when someone got their finger bitten off, someone got beat up, several people got their cars broken into? These things are far more important than a prop gun.
Because the risk of a potential mass shooting at future cons with several people being injured or dead is far more important than people getting beaten up, fingers being bitten off or cars getting broken into?
Because what rule could the convention make to control crime in the local area? It's simple to say "Hey, don't bring realistic weapons into the convention space where you could potentially upset a lot of people," as a rule where as saying "Don't bite people's fingers off" is kind of a given. It's simply a matter of where you can clarify the rules for the convention space.
@@SilkyfurI understand ur feelings however like Battery/assault and theft isn’t something to neglect because something else was made a big issue online they ALL are cause for concern and all should be addressed professionally and properly by the convention.
Crazy how firearms at cons are now a controversial issue within the furry community, because historically speaking, gun nerds/otakus were pretty prevalent in both the furry anime fandoms
I met Bomb Voyage at TFF and so I already have that bias of knowing he wouldnt bring a real gun (or any for that matter sense it wasnt his) to a con. He already apologized but now some twitter furries are calling him an alt-right red-flag based on literally nothing.
The fact that people are losing their minds and starting twitter fights over this is stupid af, Another reason why I dislike this fandom, and I'm an active member of it. Taking small situations and blowing them way out of proportion.
As someone who was in that atrium at the time of this event (it was 3:30 am Sunday night/Monday morning, so even later than Beta's estimate): -The orange dot and ribbon were VERY clear , and it seemed pretty clear that with the smaller crowd so late that EVERYONE knew who that was on the high stage, and in the moment everyone was well aware that it was an act and nothing more. I think the cosplayer was also smart enough to know not to do this at a much busier time of the con because im certain someone new to the fandom at 6pm there would NOT have such a good reaction. -FWA has kind of a miserable track record of following and enforcing their own policies and plans, whether its with prop weapons or crowd control (hello Elevator Con) or safety complaints from individuals. Theyre not malignant, but they always seem to plan for a lot less people to show up than actually do, and theyre ALWAYS overwhelmed each year. If theyre gonna do better next year, they may need to overcompensate -I definitely agree that the damage control being done is the best path forward, and im glad this has been resolved without too much online battling happening, haha
I was gonna say, I saw nothing bad from the people who were actually there to see the dude himseelf. I'm pretty sure he's also friends with a couple of the people who took pics with him.
I think that a full-on ban of tactical gear is a bit overboard especially if you're going to go to the extent Denfur did and ban everything down to camouflage pants or just gloves, even banning uniforms of any style. If there is a safety concern, then there should be a restriction on what type of gear is allowed and if a prop is involved it must be painted a certain way or the person with it should have to submit to an inspection of the prop once daily at the con. Like there is a tactical militaristic side of the fandom that I feel is being completely excluded from everything. I was kicked out of a convention for a load bearing rig I was using to carry various small things I bought as well as some needed items. There should be no reason I can't show off a half-life cosplay I spent months putting together with a prop that has bright orange parts because people don't like the sight of camouflage gear. If I can walk by a cop on the road wearing my tac vest on the way to a convention it should be fine(and I have multiple times). I will debate with anybody about this.
I guess at that point, after much thinking, if people attack or panic over a kids water gun or a giant inflatable hammer... Conventions should not exist.
3:00 That's basically where the entire argument falls apart. Everyone on site had fun and nobody complained. Some randoms on twitter decided to bitch and moan, and because the squeaky wheel gets the grease, even if it is rotting in the garage, the convention bowed down to it.
I have autism and a very high phobia of being out in public spaces, especially with all the mass shooting and gun violence reports. Even more so at a Furry convention where people HAVE TARGETED furries with violence and convention spaces before just because they hate furries. I would have lost my mind and become hysterical seeing that thinking I was seconds away from dying. Also about this, 7:07, its not clear because when you have a fursuit head on you cannot see well, and even with the head off I personally have VERY bad eyesight to stuff that is far away. I would not see that tis marked as "fake" I would just see a gun.
Which is Understandable why people would be upset or something because of it since it might be mistaken as a Firearm instead of a Toy Gun which I don’t know if this is a stupid idea but instead of Replicas of a Gun it could be a Nerf Gun or a Water Gun Just a Thought. Also Note: I like how the Gun that Bombvoyage borrowed from was Cosplaying as a HECU Soldier maybe. Just wanted to mention that since I’m a Half Life fan
I think they need to start a thing where they can put a orange/rainbow any colour band strapped around the weapon(tip and sides) and also only sertain areas/times for people whose main thing in cosplay is weapons idk man I'm British lol
This type of stuff shouldn't be allowed at a con. I wasn't there when it happened, but have heard of it through my socials. Yeah, fake weapons shouldnt fly at furry cons at all.
I’d say the issue is that it looks like someone spray painted the orange tip on that one. They’re normally bright neon orange. In fact, I’m pretty sure it’s illegal to display a toy gun without an orange tip outside an air-soft or paintball place. Idk tho don’t take my word on that.
personally, I think having a prop gun/toy gun is alright if the weapon has an orange tip/clearly fake. Unless the rules say otherwise, for example, if the place says you can't bring fake or real weapons of any sort, don't bring it.
I think it’s an important point to consider that Bomb Voyage never held a gun in The Incredibles. It shouldn’t be difficult to understand why people get nervous about stunts like this, especially not in a country where civilians suffer gun violence regularly. That said, I don’t think it’s reasonable to ban prop firearms. If a place isn’t already enforcing a rule against brandishing weapons in front of a crowd, it’s not a place anyone with any sense should go to in the first place, and if you ban prop firearms, you’re telling attendees that you want to control cosplay.
I dont think the person is at fault for using the prop as it is the staffs responsibility to handle that. If its was just a written policy then a punishment or warning would be justified but since it was particularly approved by staff i see no reason why people should blame him, if you are gonna get mad at someone get mad at the con staff. On another note i would like to point out that it is incredibly counter intuitive for states to make people jump through hoops to get a concealed carry permit and wait for unreasonable amounts of time only to be told that they are not allowed to carry in an area they are likely to be in for multiple days. And given the fact that it was a realistic looking prop that was cleared there is absolutely a chance that someone could sneak in with a real weapon, in which case all of the people in the con space would be left defenseless until law enforcement arrives should something happen.
Pls don't bann tactical gear my fursona is literally supposed to be a Vietnam vet like I get assault rifle deactivated grenades RPGs but like helmets and those older flack jackets that were pretty much useless because it was the 1960s ya know I get like modern gear like modern mich helmets but stuff that was used in the 20th century in terms of body armor and helmets and there is a few reason for this
I don't think that would be a problem unless talking about modern combat uniforms like ucp marpat multi cam m81 the three colored camouflage pattern especially dress uniforms that's definitely stolen valor but in the context of the Korean war Vietnam war and especially WW1 and 2 that wouldn't be a problem because what older person is going to a furry convention and it's totally different claiming you fought in Vietnam or the Pacific theater of WW2 but as long as you stay in that time frame and it's understood that time frame ww1 to Vietnam you should be fine but tip don't bring ww1 gear especially gas masks into conventions because alot of the original gear especially those British WW1 helmets have asbestos in them
I attended FWA (first con since joining the fandom) as well. I actually cosplayed as Alastor from Hazbin Hotel and got a good reception from everyone there.
Listen, i have two nerf vulkens, one clear, one yellow, the yellow has no battery cover for now, but because of the design of that model of nerf gun, it doesnt need battery to fire, do i plan to pretty much become heavy from tf2 while suiting at a con? Mmmm, perhaps. But if i do, i will only take it to the con space if there is a nerf war
Completely agree with your points here. The policy is clear and should be adhered too. Surprised that the convention staff gave him the go-ahead for that, definitely a poor decision on their part. Personally I'd be very uncomfortable being in that space if I saw that. If it looks like a weapon, it should be treated as if it is one, prop or not.
From what I heard that rule of no weapons in a convention space was just added after FWA ended so it's a new rule that was not specifically addressed in the code of conduct It's funny how they changed it so quickly.
Okay after looking at their policy, yeah that’s fair. I just hope the enforcement doesn’t go too far. Cartoony guns like overwatch ones (as another commenter mentioned) cannot be mistaken for a real weapon. If they cross the line, there are a million other things that cross the line, so why ban them? Or another example is a weapon in an unmistakably ridiculous situation. For example, someone brings in a costume that has a big cannon or some other comically out-of-proportion weapon. While it may look realistic, there’s no way that it’s actually dangerous, because it’s extremely unrealistic to argue that that’s an actual weapon. Like, can you bring in a blunderbuss for a pirate outfit? I’d say yes, (don’t you DARE argue that a shooter using a blunderbuss is realistic) but some employee might err on the side of caution and say no. There is some point at which you have to draw the line and say “This is just too unlikely to make anyone feel uncomfortable, so we can allow it”
I will say the peace bonding of the prop with a tag and small orange tip wasn't conspicuous enough to be seen from a good distance, and the fact that the tip of the main barrel was not orange while the part above it was probably doesn't meet the standards for imitation fire arms under 15 U.S. Code § 500 (like foam dart guns, water pistols, bb guns, paint ball guns, props etc.). This is why it's important that, for conventions that still allow prop weapons through the peace bonding process (which does not include Furry Con), that only props that are obviously fake from a distance due to their bright colors, plastic/foam construction, and conspicuous orange tip on the main barrel (for imitation fire arms) get approved. For conventions where no prop weapons are approved, it's important that not only are staff made aware of and maintain such bans or any policy changes between conventions -but the sellers too- as I recall seeing novelty weapons with metal blades (with and without sharp edges) be sold at conventions accompanied by open displays. And no, providing supervision for open displays and forbidding buyers from opening their boxed weapon on the convention premises is not enough in my perspective.
because i dont have a furrsuite and the Next EF will be Cyberpunk themed i wona go as David Martinez, and kinda want to take a "Skippy" replica with me. now the issue is it clearly fits to the cosplay and its a prop, cyberpunk themed and stuff but i am to scared to actually do it. because the line of it is not that clear.
I had a super frustrating conversation on Twitter about this. Person A was pointing out that with America's history of mass shootings it was even more inappropriate and included stats. Person B pointed out that the stats on mass shootings were somewhat misleading and inflated. So I pointed out that it's still gun violence, but that as I live in Australia ALL gun violence is shocking to me. My point being that the context of the US having high gun violence is still relevant, whether or not they were technically mass shootings, and that perhaps some Americans are a little desensitised to it. And then person B started pointing out that because I live in Australia that there are dangerous animals here? Pretty sure no were near as many people die from that as compared with gun violence in the US but that is so irrelevant. Anyway I left the conversation after that because they were missing the point so hard and I didn't know how to explain it at the time lol.
YES thank you! As a non american and live in Singapore, I'm shocked that people still defend the guy when there are dozens of mass shootings in the U.S. Heck, isn't there an LGBT nightclub shooting a few years ago? So why the fuck people think it's still okay to bring a realistic gun? Heck, furry convention does have a history of target before with MFF 2014 and a bomb threat last year.
@@LightBluly Yeah there's at least 2. Pulse nightclub in 2016 with 49 deaths and the Club Q mass shooting in 2022 with 5 deaths. It's awful. The fact that some shootings that are officially counted as "mass shootings" aren't what most people would consider a "mass shooting" is irrelevant to me, when discussing the context of why this cosplay was not a good idea. Very frustrating.
@tmaxim2651 Yeah, most "mass shootings" are gang violence in cities, where victims are usually other gang members. A problem no doubt but not what people imagine. Still, it is not a good idea to have a realistic looking weapon at any con. Even other countries still have shootings and terrorist attacks. You can cause panic or risk getting killed by police/security thinking it's a terrorist attack.
@@PsychoCivic-yw5sp yeah see I don’t think it matters whether or not most mass shootings are technically gang violence, when discussing why the context of high gun violence in America makes a prop gun inappropriate. I can see why you think it matters but I don’t.
@tmaxim2651 Oh, I was just saying that the kind of indiscriminate mass shootings most think of, while unfortunately higher in the states, are thankfully still rare. But I can see why the furry community especially would still be very anxious about attacks like that given all the constant death threats and hate... and the fact that someone sent 19 people to the hospital with chlorine gas back in 2014
so basically, if you want to cosplay as any fictional character that has/is iconic with a weapon (doesn't even have to be a gun), don't go to a furry con.
Yeahhh...This is not something I ever expected to happen....Bombvoyage carrying a realistic looking gun prop around a furry convention. I mean,I don't think it'd be an issue if it was say a prop of a Lasgun from Warhammer 40k as it's clearly a sci-fi weapon and doesn't look realistic at all
My opinion: if furries can wear kink gear at conventions, people can bring prop weapons within reason. Other conventions have no issues with fake guns I've noticed, only furries...
I attend several anime conventions and every single one has a way stricter weapon policy than any furry convention I’ve ever been too, including this one. I had one earlier this year try to not allow me in because I was carrying a light up decorative wizard staff because they had a “no wooden weapons” policy, despite it being pretty fragile and also, a literal walking stick and not a weapon.
Bro does crazy shit like this actually happen at furry cons I’ve never been to one before since im basically sticking with the mindset that even tho all of the threats made are probably fake there’s always that one person who has enough hate in their heart
I have a prop sword, and I would never take that to a convention space. If an outside Renaissance festival, I'll take it but never to a comic convention or furry convention. I do think that this whole fake gun thing was in bad taste. seriously yikes.😬
At first I was confused about why it wasn't ok then I saw that it took place in the US and just thought "Ohhhh yeah, ok that makes sense". Still though it's just a toy, I think if it had an orange tip or something along those lines it would be fine just something to denote that it's not an actual gun.
I thought the rules of prop weapons in conventions were well known. If it's a gun, it needs an orange tip Sword, knife, gun, whatever; NEVER point your weapon at another person (Different if you're doing a photo)
Thank you for making this video, while I think we definitely should prioritize peoples safety and not have weapons or prop weapons in con spaces, I also have seen Bomb Voyage at my local meets in SoCal, he definitely didnt mean anything by this and maybe just got a little carried away in the moment. I hope nobody has animosity towards him, sometimes we all go a little overboard. But yes, we should not have prop weapons in con spaces.
how many dislikes can we get on this? If the staff wasn't stopping them and nobody bothered to ask about it while it was going on then why is everyone shitting on the guy bringing a TOY to the convention lol this is cringe af!!
I 100% thing weapons or fake weapons that look real shouldn’t be allowed but I was at a small con a few months ago and some had a fake gun with an orange tip to indicate that it was fake an I think that is ok but if it isn’t clearly marked as fake its shouldn’t be allowed. Plus con real should have better security like a few metal detectors or something because all the cons I have been to had little to no security besides checking if you had a badge.
This is quite a good and fair standpoint. I agree with you, but something I can't bring myself to understand -maybe because in latinamerica it doesn't happen this much- is how naturalised sexual behaviour is. By no mean do we have the firearm issue the states have, and because of that, maybe it explains why it is odd for us to see how a prop gun could be "controversial"; but still, by reading the news and the annual shootings your country has, you can tell there's a problem. I keep my point, however, in that sexually inappropriate demeanour should be addressed more thoroughly. Good video Beta!
Welllll I feel like what he did wasn't ment in bad faith, but I would be a least a little scared in such a situation. Luckily it didn't happen often but there have been attempts of terrorism at furcons so I dunno 🫤 seeing a realistic looking gun there does feel bad
@@ndrew_B he didn't do it he wasn't the calprate what are you thinking and the guy is actually innocent he did mess up with a toy gon but he was only playing actually and didn't realize what he was doing you need to watch the whole video to get a better understanding
While I do think the people involved could have handled this better, I also think the con staff could try to make better rules regarding this stuff. Like making it so that any prop/toy guns are only allowed if registered with the con staff so they can be sure it isn't real. (and not allowing ammunition for toy guns for safety) Although regarding military/tactical gear I don't really know what to do to make them better because like, its just clothes? as long as it isn't harmful or offensive military/tactical stuff should be allowed I think.
The A-10 Thunderbolt II, also known as the Warthog, is a single-engine, twin-fuselage, twin-tail, turbojet-powered, straight-wing aircraft developed by Fairchild-Republic and first introduced into service in the US Air Force in 1977. It is one of the most heavily armed aircraft in history, capable of carrying a lethal payload of missiles, rockets, bombs and a 30mm GAU-8/A Avenger rotary cannon. The A-10 was designed to provide close air support to ground troops in combat situations, and it is known for its impressive maneuverability and survivability. It is capable of operating from rough airfields and can withstand damage that would destroy other aircraft, thanks to its robust construction and protected systems. The A-10's 30mm Avenger cannon is its primary weapon, capable of firing up to 6,000 rounds per minute and destroying tanks, bunkers and other armored vehicles. The A-10 also has a long range, able to fly up to 9,000 kilometers (5,590 miles) without refueling, and it can deliver a devastating payload of air-to-ground ordinance, including Maverick missiles, laser-guided bombs, and cluster bombs. The A-10 is also equipped with a variety of sensors and electronic warfare systems, including a forward-looking infrared camera, a laser designator and a high-speed data link, making it ideal for close air support missions in the most challenging combat environments. The A-10 has seen extensive use during the Gulf War, the war in Iraq and the war in Afghanistan, providing close air support to ground troops and engaging in a wide range of combat missions. It has been praised for its effectiveness and its ability to survive in the toughest conditions, and it remains a vital asset for the US Air Force and its allies.
I think my favourite non furry cosplay at a furry convention is the TF2 Spy with a paper mask depicting a generic furry OC on it. Or so I'm led to believe. I have never seen one at a convention. Truly an unparalleled master of disguise. He could be you. He could be me. He could even be-
![Quando Rondo - Grow Up [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8zFnCg3BO4Q/mqdefault.jpg)
Bombvoyage blew up my house, currently living in Mcdonalds, send help.
ok (0.02$ Sent) hope this helps
they must be stopped, someone lost their finger, nothing related to drugs
Can I get a bigmac pls
1: This is a really good M16 prop, dayum. Thought it was Airsoft at first.
2: That's what Super Soakers and NERFs are for. NERF has an apropriatly plasticky, colourful and cartoon proportioned M16 that is still recongniseable as an AR15 thanks to the Fortnite colab.
Or airsoft. It’s less noticeable but the orange tip is enough to go “Oh okay that’s not real”
Airsoft is designed to be almost 1 to 1, a high quality M16A1 would look even closer to the real deal than that prop, that's why hollywood uses them, if they don't need them to be shot, it both looks just right on camera, and is safer for people on set.
@jimcobbler3954 Seeing the video, I can't hardly see the orange tip. From the distance I may not have seen it.
tbh if someone carried a fake gun in a crowd of people who can't stop receiving hate from the internet and extremist I would be scared too
i didnt understand why this is a problem if the cons I go to there are a lot of people who come with guns or tactical cosplays and then I remember most of you are from the USA
Guns= anti furry
I mean given how often mass shootings take place here in the US, people should really know better than to bring a prop that looks realistic (even with an orange tip).
I have to disagree with you their. Mass shooting aren't exactly that common given the fact that the US is massive and contains hundreds of millions of people. That point is mostly brought up as propaganda by one side of the political isle to push their goals, and isn't exactly grounded in reality.
Yeah, with the videos I've seen, I really had to pay attention to the vid to see the orange tip. In a crowd with a mask would make it nearly impossible to see the tip.
@@jimcobbler3954 the hotel is absolutely massive. i saw this in person, but from far away, and could not see the orange tip. had it continued much longer, i would've likely found the nearest police officer or called 911. it only takes ONE person to start panicking to cause a stampede, or to cause other people to pull out their REAL guns/other weapons.
@@protowave (Deleted reply because I finished the video and was wrong)
Yeah it was neon it was just hard to see.
I think the new policy is fine as long as it's enforced on fake guns that look similar enough to be a problem.
As you might relate that prop to a threat others may not. It’s a strange conversation to be had but a necessary one. If any bit of statistics would lighten your mood and dampen ur fear no mass shooting within the US has ever occurred at any sort of convention and that’s not some malarky I’m talking about over 60-70 years of all kinds of conventions held yearly or even monthly. The single one that had a mass shooting wasn’t even a convention it was a video game tournament at a convention center. (If ur interested in the name it’s the Jacksonville landing shooting and it’s a damn shame that it happened) The chances (as fuck up as saying people dying is a chance) is EXPONENTIALLY lower than dying in a car crash on the way to a convention in the first place or on the way to work. Not defending improper gun etiquette here just trying to explain that fear is very much misplaced.
Why was the gun allowed if it violates the con rules? Some consistency from FWA staff is needed here! That prop gun shouldn't have been allowed, period. Even under the older, more relaxed rules.
The con released a statement on that, they stated that it was likely a poorly trained member of staff who wasnt aware it breached con rules.
even so, it's extremely easy to literally just walk into the hotel through the front door without having ever registered for the convention. there's thousands of people in the lobby and nobody is going to stop you from going anywhere, really, unless it's a panel room that requires registration.
so this same thing could've happened with anyone off the street, with a real or a fake gun, at any time.
its a toy,orange muzzle and bam
@@heyer777 doesnt matter, from that distance it can easily be seen as real. Especially when in a fursuit head and unable to see well.
I think cosplaying as a villain and pointing or even carrying a prop gun has the same effect as cosplaying as a firefighter and screaming “FIRE!!!”. In-character or not, anybody who isn’t paying 100% attention to you (which is most of the people there) will be startled by the display and may react accordingly.
its not, but I get where your coming from.
@@demong0ld322The cat in your pfp looks gay
Funny you say Fire.
furries do have a pretty valid reason to get anxious around guns, toy or not
I mean if its a toy then the person wouldn't be armed in the first place
Most people have a pretty valid reason to get anxious around armed people tbh (it is deadly)
@@ArmmoonPEbut it wasn’t deadly, it was made of foam.
@@nicholasg6048 The Problem is it LOOKS Like A Real Gun.
@@jkdragonjk6895 isnt as if someone can add stuff to a real gun to make it look like a toy one
As someone who had brought a bright orange and white clone trooper gun to a furry con I’d say you gotta make sure that it is obviously not a real thing!
Agreed. I don’t like the bandwagoning in the comments section. I wonder if, rather than barring realistic fake guns from cons altogether, it would be a good idea to just ban waving them around. That way you could still have them on an outfit or something, but choosing to wave it around would be risking getting booted from the con.
Worst case, if people still decide to do it, they ban them altogether instead.
Its funny seeing someone I know be part of this. I'm not surprised though. its not the first time he got into trouble, the the last time was because he was trolling some undesirable people.
Plus, FWA was littered with real guns. I heard rumors of several furries that had real guns there, there were cops littering the hotel, and while FWA and the Marquis may prohibit firearms, there are other non-furry guests who may not be aware of or care about the policy. We are after in a state that is very gun friendly. I think a shooter wouldn't have a very good time there. That with that same thought in mind, Bootles point about him potentially spooking someone who is carrying and then could open fire is a valid concern.
Absolutely. I suppose that I'm a little biased being an Australian, but the idea of there being actual weapons at a con seems insane to me, but since they're there, it seems to be in poor taste to poke the proverbial bear by brandishing what very much appears to be an actual assault rifle above a large crowd. Definitely could provoke a lethal response. Thankfully not the case here but there's a valuable lesson to be learned from this. Hopefully it's taken to heart for all future events.
@@Alopexus I am australian and I disagree, having weapons makes sense, I carry weapons for self defence given my line of work and the city I am in.
If con security is A+ tier, then I can understand not carrying it, and restricting arms, but given I saw little to no security patrols, if at all, I can completely get behind having people there with firearms, given some people like take their own safety into their own hands
I think it was mainly the fact that he was standing on the Pulse platform, when everyone there is, or should be, very aware of the Pulse Nightclub incident.
constitional carry state
It had nothing to do with the Pulse platform you are one of 2 people I've seen mention this no one else cares about that they legit only care about the Prop
@@CountDraccula We must run in different circles then, because I've seen a lot of people talking about that particular detail.
@@dominickparker Okay, and cons have the right to ask people not to carry, what's your point?
I think that the public reaction to this stunt is reasonable, especially given that it's likely that a large portion of the crowd might not have been aware of the fact that the gun was fake. The antifur rhetoric is just far too gung-ho about stuff like this for this to be immediately taken as a joke. People are going to assume that a gun which looks that realistic is real, and react accordingly. While the joke may have been made with no ill intent, they should have considered how it might appear to onlookers. People have tried to argue that this was "just a joke" and that the people who are complaining are just snowflakes, but that argument just doesn't hold up. It is not at all easy to tell that the gun is marked as a prop, and regardless of the police being aware of it, the congoers were not. This could easily have been mistaken for someone actually aiming a real firearm at the crowd, and I know that I personally would have panicked on initially seeing the weapon, and been highly concerned about it after noticing the orange tip, if I did notice the tip at all. This is a great example of someone not properly considering public perception when planning a stunt. They likely didn't mean any harm, but they caused harm nonetheless, and it is very important that situations like this are avoided, either by informing congoers of the presence of prop firearms at a con accompanied with a description of the weapon, or by preventing people from bringing prop firearms.
I ain’t reading all that
@@monochromemann I wasn't going to make you. Why did you even feel the need to write a comment about it if you aren't going to read it?
@@MiaTheOtterPup it was a joke.
@@monochromemann Oh my bad, I'm kinda bad at social cues sometimes TwT
@@MiaTheOtterPup it’s alright guvnah
Wish I could have gone to FWA.. My cousin lives in Atlanta, I'm gonna ask him if he saw anything.
Love Bomb Voyage, but he stabbed a Lethal Company employee.
I guess the gun thing could definitely make people anxious.
i thought that was pyro tf2 lol
Pyro.... From Lethal Company?
Ain't no way
good thing i have a gears of war rifle. nobody is going to believe thats a real chainsaw bayonet
im gonna bring a cod zombies raygun
and ask if its alowed or not, and specificly ask if its too realistic
Couldn't do Syndrome and have a spider plushie to carry around. Noooo.
I think there was largely an overreaction.
Bro ain't a threat to our community. I was the guy with the pizza blanket. I met the DHMIS crew!
🦓💚
yup hes not, hes just having fun
Thas mah boy Pedro. He's chillin' silly man.
He's deffinitly not, he just got carried away after WAY too many mistakes happend with staff comunication lol
He really was a threat!
He could have easily caused a panic from the crowd or a concealed carrier could have precieved him as a threat.
He put his fellow con goers at risk for a cheap stunt to get himself noticed
@@nessunday hmm, nope!
I had only seen pictures without context so far, so it brings me a lot of relief to know that it wasn't some edgy dude doing his thing
You must have only seen the two images news outlets want you to see. I looked him up through google search and got plenty of results of the dude chilling or joking around with other attendees. He was not a threat at all.
Had the pleasure of speaking to him a few times. He's a really nice dude and very chill.
Bombvoyage should not gotten this much negativity. What concerns me is that the furry fandom is getting more attention from certain “news” channels and I don’t want some crazy random person do anything crazy.
I wonder if you think they are no more as much news channels than Yeezy's or maybe even And 1's are Jordans?
Crazy things have already happened, I believe in 2014 at MFF there was a chlorine gas attack that hospitalized some people and a few cons have had threats called on em that resulted in police intervention
i don't think the lack of someone doing something weird will stop such channels from doing fear-mongering, other hobbies with large communities and minority groups have plenty of incidents to give examples on it.
So do you think I brought up a good point or what?
9:01 this is an incredibly stupid and shortsighted “solution”.
If someone wants to commit a mass atrocity, do you REALLY think that a piece of paper/statement is going to stop them from gunning down dozens of innocent people?
Reducing the number of false-positives in a threat environment reduces the unnecessary collateral
kinda crazy how convention staff let in an actual super villian into the convention they better train their security to better spot people who have increased chances of destroying the city
This is most ok not-ok thing I have ever seen from a furry convention. You all know what I mean.
That said. As someone who was raised around guns and grew up with gun safety as a general fact of life, several not ok things happened here.
1) always treat any gun, even a prop gun, as if it is a loaded weapon (posing for pictures is ok, but pointing it into the crowd is not)
2) prop or toy guns should be very clearly marked as not real, and if it isn't clear at a glance then it is not clearly marked (it's pretty obvious how it could be mistaken for a real one)
3) the cosplayer let someone take their real looking gun away from them (people expect such items to be held by the appropriate cosplay, not by randos, so this was basically asking to cause panic)
I think it'd be pretty fair to ban any realistic looking cosplay of combat/war characters and their weapons, so like a CoD cosplay. But I don't think the same should apply to well known pop culture characters, like the TF2 or Overwatch characters, as long as they *CLEARLY* mark their gear as props and don't let people run off with it.
I agree, this dude did not do a great job, and I hate that they are changing rules because of this screwup
"...so like a CoD cosplay. But I don't think the same should apply to well known pop culture characters, like the TF2 or Overwatch characters..." ... Did you forget that Ghost exists??? Or, has no one told you about him yet? This is coming from someone who *also* thinks this was handled poorly.
@@Cade_Rufus you know what no, I don't know or care wtf ever Ghost is.
Now if you're done being a snob about my video game knowledge, I'd like to go back to the serious conversation that was being had.
@@graveyardshift2100 Ghost is an iconic character from CoD. He's the dude with the skull mask. and painted eyes. You must have lived under a rock for the last several years to not have even seen him on the internet.
Don't call someone else a snob for calling attention to a lapse in your knowledge if you yourself are gonna act like an even bigger snob. A simple google search and a more appropriate response would have suffice
People shouldn't assume that every furry knows about all so-called "well known pop culture characters". Not all furries play video games in their spare time. I am 47 years old, and what is a "well known pop culture character" to furries of one age group, may not be equally well known to furries of another age group.
I have never played TF2 or Overwatch, nor have I seen anyone play it, or talked to anyone about the games.
If someone was cosplaying a character from those games, I would have no idea. It could just be a lunatic with a gun.
I'm not blamming the cosplayer for what happened, but honestly (and unfortunately) america has too many mass shootings for this to have been okay. I would have been nervous too if I had seen this. I live in Georgia and people can carry weapons here, so it wouldn't have been too much of a leap to think it was, especially for the people seeing it at a distance.
So Now I cant go as my tactical fursona...
I didn't even know this was a cosplay of a character. I just thought someone was being a mime. I saw the guy earlier in the con doing mime-like shenanigans, so I was taken aback by the photo where he poses with the prop weapon as being very unbecoming of a mime, though I kind of now understand that this is part of the point of the character, I suppose.
Some people still consider the cosplayer's response as a non-apology, though I think that it sounds reasonable, as well as the con's response: none of this seems to have been intentional, and everyone involved has learned a lesson.
I mean, in all fairness, the way he was carrying it would be physically impossible with an actual gun of that size due to the weight and the balance, and from the footage he seems to be avoiding putting his fingers visibly near the trigger area, but I do think the part where he was pointing it at the audience was extremely irresponsible. Personally, I don't think he should be banned, but being very firmly asked *not* to repeat this stunt lest he be banned (and permanently) seems imminently reasonable to me.
All valid points. Respecting trigger discipline is important, but there’s a limit to what it can defend.
I spotted Bombvoyage at a con I attended! I was so tickled to see such a relatively obscure cosplay.
I reckon they meant well, but given the country we live in, people really need to be savvy and careful about waving around realistic-looking weapons or feigning or gesturing to violent or terroristic gestures, threats, or acts.
Thank you for being a reasonable person
I don’t necessarily blame the guy, but also it’s so understandable that people don’t want to see weapons, fake or not, in public. There have been many public “incidents” with weapons, and it’s much more fun to just not bring something that might make people uncomfortable or confused.
That's why you need that orange around the muzzle. That's actually one of the reasons nerf guns have the orange bits. It's to make sure it's know its not real.
Why talk about this when someone got their finger bitten off, someone got beat up, several people got their cars broken into? These things are far more important than a prop gun.
Idk. Funni?
Because the risk of a potential mass shooting at future cons with several people being injured or dead is far more important than people getting beaten up, fingers being bitten off or cars getting broken into?
Because what rule could the convention make to control crime in the local area? It's simple to say "Hey, don't bring realistic weapons into the convention space where you could potentially upset a lot of people," as a rule where as saying "Don't bite people's fingers off" is kind of a given. It's simply a matter of where you can clarify the rules for the convention space.
@@SilkyfurI understand ur feelings however like Battery/assault and theft isn’t something to neglect because something else was made a big issue online they ALL are cause for concern and all should be addressed professionally and properly by the convention.
“The bombvoyage furry convention drama” ok guys we can pack up. This is what humanity has been leading to.
Crazy how firearms at cons are now a controversial issue within the furry community, because historically speaking, gun nerds/otakus were pretty prevalent in both the furry anime fandoms
they clearly have no place in the fandom
I met Bomb Voyage at TFF and so I already have that bias of knowing he wouldnt bring a real gun (or any for that matter sense it wasnt his)
to a con.
He already apologized but now some twitter furries are calling him an alt-right red-flag based on literally nothing.
The fact that people are losing their minds and starting twitter fights over this is stupid af, Another reason why I dislike this fandom, and I'm an active member of it. Taking small situations and blowing them way out of proportion.
I replied to that tweet expressing my fears and concerns, and so many people replied IN FAVOR of wanting guns at cons!! Like, WHAT!? People are insane
As someone who was in that atrium at the time of this event (it was 3:30 am Sunday night/Monday morning, so even later than Beta's estimate):
-The orange dot and ribbon were VERY clear , and it seemed pretty clear that with the smaller crowd so late that EVERYONE knew who that was on the high stage, and in the moment everyone was well aware that it was an act and nothing more. I think the cosplayer was also smart enough to know not to do this at a much busier time of the con because im certain someone new to the fandom at 6pm there would NOT have such a good reaction.
-FWA has kind of a miserable track record of following and enforcing their own policies and plans, whether its with prop weapons or crowd control (hello Elevator Con) or safety complaints from individuals. Theyre not malignant, but they always seem to plan for a lot less people to show up than actually do, and theyre ALWAYS overwhelmed each year. If theyre gonna do better next year, they may need to overcompensate
-I definitely agree that the damage control being done is the best path forward, and im glad this has been resolved without too much online battling happening, haha
Thanks for clarifying those details. Helps to know.
I understand why people would be worried and why people would be confused on this
Talk about a nothingburger... Everyone there loved it, yet people on Twitter who heard about it secondhand had a crying fit over it. 🙄
I was gonna say, I saw nothing bad from the people who were actually there to see the dude himseelf. I'm pretty sure he's also friends with a couple of the people who took pics with him.
Was that before or after half the con goers issued a formal complaint?
@@nessundayis this another Twitter lie?
I think that a full-on ban of tactical gear is a bit overboard especially if you're going to go to the extent Denfur did and ban everything down to camouflage pants or just gloves, even banning uniforms of any style. If there is a safety concern, then there should be a restriction on what type of gear is allowed and if a prop is involved it must be painted a certain way or the person with it should have to submit to an inspection of the prop once daily at the con. Like there is a tactical militaristic side of the fandom that I feel is being completely excluded from everything. I was kicked out of a convention for a load bearing rig I was using to carry various small things I bought as well as some needed items. There should be no reason I can't show off a half-life cosplay I spent months putting together with a prop that has bright orange parts because people don't like the sight of camouflage gear. If I can walk by a cop on the road wearing my tac vest on the way to a convention it should be fine(and I have multiple times). I will debate with anybody about this.
does "no weapons" apply to conically cartoon splatoon-style guns and inflatable hammers
Probably not
I guess at that point, after much thinking, if people attack or panic over a kids water gun or a giant inflatable hammer...
Conventions should not exist.
No *realistic-looking* weapons.
I think neft guns r ok
Anything can be a weapon John Wick 2 proved that (see pencil scene). Time to ban it all
I just don't think having a fake gun at a furry con, there has been so many shootings in general.
3:00 That's basically where the entire argument falls apart.
Everyone on site had fun and nobody complained.
Some randoms on twitter decided to bitch and moan, and because the squeaky wheel gets the grease, even if it is rotting in the garage, the convention bowed down to it.
EXACTLY MY RESPONSE
I dont have a fursuit, but I wear a crusader outfit and helmet to furry conventions
I have autism and a very high phobia of being out in public spaces, especially with all the mass shooting and gun violence reports. Even more so at a Furry convention where people HAVE TARGETED furries with violence and convention spaces before just because they hate furries. I would have lost my mind and become hysterical seeing that thinking I was seconds away from dying. Also about this, 7:07, its not clear because when you have a fursuit head on you cannot see well, and even with the head off I personally have VERY bad eyesight to stuff that is far away. I would not see that tis marked as "fake" I would just see a gun.
Which is Understandable why people would be upset or something because of it since it might be mistaken as a Firearm instead of a Toy Gun which I don’t know if this is a stupid idea but instead of Replicas of a Gun it could be a Nerf Gun or a Water Gun Just a Thought.
Also Note: I like how the Gun that Bombvoyage borrowed from was Cosplaying as a HECU Soldier maybe. Just wanted to mention that since I’m a Half Life fan
Maybe if it was more "toy" looking, like a nerf gun.
I remember I saw the first Bombvoyage picture and I was like: hey nice. I know that character
I think they need to start a thing where they can put a orange/rainbow any colour band strapped around the weapon(tip and sides) and also only sertain areas/times for people whose main thing in cosplay is weapons idk man I'm British lol
Thank you for showing and telling me about this video Beta.
This type of stuff shouldn't be allowed at a con. I wasn't there when it happened, but have heard of it through my socials. Yeah, fake weapons shouldnt fly at furry cons at all.
...you've clearly never been to a anime/comic conventon
I’d say the issue is that it looks like someone spray painted the orange tip on that one. They’re normally bright neon orange.
In fact, I’m pretty sure it’s illegal to display a toy gun without an orange tip outside an air-soft or paintball place. Idk tho don’t take my word on that.
I hate how this is what’s blowing up instead of the actual incidents like the stealing or someone losing a finger etc
personally, I think having a prop gun/toy gun is alright if the weapon has an orange tip/clearly fake.
Unless the rules say otherwise, for example, if the place says you can't bring fake or real weapons of any sort, don't bring it.
Dang.....good thing I think my homecon has gone full no gun props. It sucks I was gonna gonna be a helldiver
I think it’s an important point to consider that Bomb Voyage never held a gun in The Incredibles. It shouldn’t be difficult to understand why people get nervous about stunts like this, especially not in a country where civilians suffer gun violence regularly.
That said, I don’t think it’s reasonable to ban prop firearms. If a place isn’t already enforcing a rule against brandishing weapons in front of a crowd, it’s not a place anyone with any sense should go to in the first place, and if you ban prop firearms, you’re telling attendees that you want to control cosplay.
They should have added a orange tip to the prop toy or used a water gxn instead lol xD
It does have an orange tip
7:05
I dont think the person is at fault for using the prop as it is the staffs responsibility to handle that. If its was just a written policy then a punishment or warning would be justified but since it was particularly approved by staff i see no reason why people should blame him, if you are gonna get mad at someone get mad at the con staff. On another note i would like to point out that it is incredibly counter intuitive for states to make people jump through hoops to get a concealed carry permit and wait for unreasonable amounts of time only to be told that they are not allowed to carry in an area they are likely to be in for multiple days. And given the fact that it was a realistic looking prop that was cleared there is absolutely a chance that someone could sneak in with a real weapon, in which case all of the people in the con space would be left defenseless until law enforcement arrives should something happen.
Pls don't bann tactical gear my fursona is literally supposed to be a Vietnam vet like I get assault rifle deactivated grenades RPGs but like helmets and those older flack jackets that were pretty much useless because it was the 1960s ya know I get like modern gear like modern mich helmets but stuff that was used in the 20th century in terms of body armor and helmets and there is a few reason for this
Heads up, but pretending to be a REAL vet is probably more offensive than bringing prop weapons
Stolen valor?
I don't think that would be a problem unless talking about modern combat uniforms like ucp marpat multi cam m81 the three colored camouflage pattern especially dress uniforms that's definitely stolen valor but in the context of the Korean war Vietnam war and especially WW1 and 2 that wouldn't be a problem because what older person is going to a furry convention and it's totally different claiming you fought in Vietnam or the Pacific theater of WW2 but as long as you stay in that time frame and it's understood that time frame ww1 to Vietnam you should be fine but tip don't bring ww1 gear especially gas masks into conventions because alot of the original gear especially those British WW1 helmets have asbestos in them
I attended FWA (first con since joining the fandom) as well. I actually cosplayed as Alastor from Hazbin Hotel and got a good reception from everyone there.
My boy is getting famous.
what about the reports of sex in public or alleged harasment
we dont talk about Bruno
This is definitely more important because it’s more prevalent at furry conventions….
@@caduguardrailkingowoactually we DO talk about Bruno
I went to FWA this year, and I figured something would end up becoming a meme. This dude was really in character.
Listen, i have two nerf vulkens, one clear, one yellow, the yellow has no battery cover for now, but because of the design of that model of nerf gun, it doesnt need battery to fire, do i plan to pretty much become heavy from tf2 while suiting at a con?
Mmmm, perhaps.
But if i do, i will only take it to the con space if there is a nerf war
Completely agree with your points here. The policy is clear and should be adhered too. Surprised that the convention staff gave him the go-ahead for that, definitely a poor decision on their part. Personally I'd be very uncomfortable being in that space if I saw that. If it looks like a weapon, it should be treated as if it is one, prop or not.
From what I heard that rule of no weapons in a convention space was just added after FWA ended so it's a new rule that was not specifically addressed in the code of conduct It's funny how they changed it so quickly.
I went in full m81 with my deer nub, I kinda worry that I cant do my silly furry larps anymore
honestly, its not a him issue, its a con issue. dont hate on the poor guy hes just being goofy
Okay after looking at their policy, yeah that’s fair.
I just hope the enforcement doesn’t go too far. Cartoony guns like overwatch ones (as another commenter mentioned) cannot be mistaken for a real weapon. If they cross the line, there are a million other things that cross the line, so why ban them?
Or another example is a weapon in an unmistakably ridiculous situation. For example, someone brings in a costume that has a big cannon or some other comically out-of-proportion weapon. While it may look realistic, there’s no way that it’s actually dangerous, because it’s extremely unrealistic to argue that that’s an actual weapon.
Like, can you bring in a blunderbuss for a pirate outfit? I’d say yes, (don’t you DARE argue that a shooter using a blunderbuss is realistic) but some employee might err on the side of caution and say no.
There is some point at which you have to draw the line and say “This is just too unlikely to make anyone feel uncomfortable, so we can allow it”
I will say the peace bonding of the prop with a tag and small orange tip wasn't conspicuous enough to be seen from a good distance, and the fact that the tip of the main barrel was not orange while the part above it was probably doesn't meet the standards for imitation fire arms under 15 U.S. Code § 500 (like foam dart guns, water pistols, bb guns, paint ball guns, props etc.). This is why it's important that, for conventions that still allow prop weapons through the peace bonding process (which does not include Furry Con), that only props that are obviously fake from a distance due to their bright colors, plastic/foam construction, and conspicuous orange tip on the main barrel (for imitation fire arms) get approved. For conventions where no prop weapons are approved, it's important that not only are staff made aware of and maintain such bans or any policy changes between conventions -but the sellers too- as I recall seeing novelty weapons with metal blades (with and without sharp edges) be sold at conventions accompanied by open displays. And no, providing supervision for open displays and forbidding buyers from opening their boxed weapon on the convention premises is not enough in my perspective.
YO THAT'S MY BOY CALVIN WHO'S DRESSED UP AS VELMA, DAPHNIE, AND FRED!!!
Omg hehehe HI star! :D
because i dont have a furrsuite and the Next EF will be Cyberpunk themed i wona go as David Martinez, and kinda want to take a "Skippy" replica with me. now the issue is it clearly fits to the cosplay and its a prop, cyberpunk themed and stuff but i am to scared to actually do it. because the line of it is not that clear.
I had a super frustrating conversation on Twitter about this. Person A was pointing out that with America's history of mass shootings it was even more inappropriate and included stats. Person B pointed out that the stats on mass shootings were somewhat misleading and inflated. So I pointed out that it's still gun violence, but that as I live in Australia ALL gun violence is shocking to me. My point being that the context of the US having high gun violence is still relevant, whether or not they were technically mass shootings, and that perhaps some Americans are a little desensitised to it. And then person B started pointing out that because I live in Australia that there are dangerous animals here? Pretty sure no were near as many people die from that as compared with gun violence in the US but that is so irrelevant. Anyway I left the conversation after that because they were missing the point so hard and I didn't know how to explain it at the time lol.
YES thank you! As a non american and live in Singapore, I'm shocked that people still defend the guy when there are dozens of mass shootings in the U.S. Heck, isn't there an LGBT nightclub shooting a few years ago?
So why the fuck people think it's still okay to bring a realistic gun? Heck, furry convention does have a history of target before with MFF 2014 and a bomb threat last year.
@@LightBluly
Yeah there's at least 2. Pulse nightclub in 2016 with 49 deaths and the Club Q mass shooting in 2022 with 5 deaths. It's awful. The fact that some shootings that are officially counted as "mass shootings" aren't what most people would consider a "mass shooting" is irrelevant to me, when discussing the context of why this cosplay was not a good idea. Very frustrating.
@tmaxim2651 Yeah, most "mass shootings" are gang violence in cities, where victims are usually other gang members. A problem no doubt but not what people imagine.
Still, it is not a good idea to have a realistic looking weapon at any con. Even other countries still have shootings and terrorist attacks. You can cause panic or risk getting killed by police/security thinking it's a terrorist attack.
@@PsychoCivic-yw5sp yeah see I don’t think it matters whether or not most mass shootings are technically gang violence, when discussing why the context of high gun violence in America makes a prop gun inappropriate. I can see why you think it matters but I don’t.
@tmaxim2651 Oh, I was just saying that the kind of indiscriminate mass shootings most think of, while unfortunately higher in the states, are thankfully still rare. But I can see why the furry community especially would still be very anxious about attacks like that given all the constant death threats and hate... and the fact that someone sent 19 people to the hospital with chlorine gas back in 2014
so basically, if you want to cosplay as any fictional character that has/is iconic with a weapon (doesn't even have to be a gun), don't go to a furry con.
Yeahhh...This is not something I ever expected to happen....Bombvoyage carrying a realistic looking gun prop around a furry convention. I mean,I don't think it'd be an issue if it was say a prop of a Lasgun from Warhammer 40k as it's clearly a sci-fi weapon and doesn't look realistic at all
Well this is certainly a headline I never thought I would read, maybe ever lol
Someone should called the incredibles and frozone to stop Bomb Voyage from plotting his evil plans.
My opinion: if furries can wear kink gear at conventions, people can bring prop weapons within reason. Other conventions have no issues with fake guns I've noticed, only furries...
Guess it’s cause of the whole anti-furry stuff.
I attend several anime conventions and every single one has a way stricter weapon policy than any furry convention I’ve ever been too, including this one. I had one earlier this year try to not allow me in because I was carrying a light up decorative wizard staff because they had a “no wooden weapons” policy, despite it being pretty fragile and also, a literal walking stick and not a weapon.
Bro does crazy shit like this actually happen at furry cons I’ve never been to one before since im basically sticking with the mindset that even tho all of the threats made are probably fake there’s always that one person who has enough hate in their heart
seem like a case were a nerf gun would be a good prop, there colorful and often have a brand on them
"Monsieur Incroyable!"
-Bomb Voyage, whatever year the prologue of "The Incredibles" takes place
I have a prop sword, and I would never take that to a convention space. If an outside Renaissance festival, I'll take it but never to a comic convention or furry convention. I do think that this whole fake gun thing was in bad taste. seriously yikes.😬
At first I was confused about why it wasn't ok then I saw that it took place in the US and just thought "Ohhhh yeah, ok that makes sense". Still though it's just a toy, I think if it had an orange tip or something along those lines it would be fine just something to denote that it's not an actual gun.
I thought the rules of prop weapons in conventions were well known.
If it's a gun, it needs an orange tip
Sword, knife, gun, whatever; NEVER point your weapon at another person (Different if you're doing a photo)
Thank you for making this video, while I think we definitely should prioritize peoples safety and not have weapons or prop weapons in con spaces, I also have seen Bomb Voyage at my local meets in SoCal, he definitely didnt mean anything by this and maybe just got a little carried away in the moment. I hope nobody has animosity towards him, sometimes we all go a little overboard. But yes, we should not have prop weapons in con spaces.
Bomb voyage doesn’t even have a gun though?
Edit: ah, that makes more sense.
how many dislikes can we get on this? If the staff wasn't stopping them and nobody bothered to ask about it while it was going on then why is everyone shitting on the guy bringing a TOY to the convention lol this is cringe af!!
I saw the picture of the video and I celebrated
I 100% thing weapons or fake weapons that look real shouldn’t be allowed but I was at a small con a few months ago and some had a fake gun with an orange tip to indicate that it was fake an I think that is ok but if it isn’t clearly marked as fake its shouldn’t be allowed. Plus con real should have better security like a few metal detectors or something because all the cons I have been to had little to no security besides checking if you had a badge.
That wont stop criminals.
This is quite a good and fair standpoint. I agree with you, but something I can't bring myself to understand -maybe because in latinamerica it doesn't happen this much- is how naturalised sexual behaviour is. By no mean do we have the firearm issue the states have, and because of that, maybe it explains why it is odd for us to see how a prop gun could be "controversial"; but still, by reading the news and the annual shootings your country has, you can tell there's a problem. I keep my point, however, in that sexually inappropriate demeanour should be addressed more thoroughly. Good video Beta!
Welllll I feel like what he did wasn't ment in bad faith, but I would be a least a little scared in such a situation. Luckily it didn't happen often but there have been attempts of terrorism at furcons so I dunno 🫤 seeing a realistic looking gun there does feel bad
1:33 bros doing the Tuskin Raiders arm raise
Thanks for the update! Good analysis and I agree.
I wonder what caused the fire probably was electrical sometimes faulty wiring is the main cause of it
No, it was Bomb Voyage clearly
@@ndrew_B he didn't do it he wasn't the calprate what are you thinking and the guy is actually innocent he did mess up with a toy gon but he was only playing actually and didn't realize what he was doing you need to watch the whole video to get a better understanding
@@mrsnayarlhats4242Whoosh.
the thumbnail made it 10x better
While I do think the people involved could have handled this better, I also think the con staff could try to make better rules regarding this stuff. Like making it so that any prop/toy guns are only allowed if registered with the con staff so they can be sure it isn't real.
(and not allowing ammunition for toy guns for safety)
Although regarding military/tactical gear I don't really know what to do to make them better because like, its just clothes? as long as it isn't harmful or offensive military/tactical stuff should be allowed I think.
I think it stems from people at anime conventions pointing guns at furries.
Guess I cant have my character's foam knives
The A-10 Thunderbolt II, also known as the Warthog, is a single-engine, twin-fuselage, twin-tail, turbojet-powered, straight-wing aircraft developed by Fairchild-Republic and first introduced into service in the US Air Force in 1977. It is one of the most heavily armed aircraft in history, capable of carrying a lethal payload of missiles, rockets, bombs and a 30mm GAU-8/A Avenger rotary cannon. The A-10 was designed to provide close air support to ground troops in combat situations, and it is known for its impressive maneuverability and survivability. It is capable of operating from rough airfields and can withstand damage that would destroy other aircraft, thanks to its robust construction and protected systems. The A-10's 30mm Avenger cannon is its primary weapon, capable of firing up to 6,000 rounds per minute and destroying tanks, bunkers and other armored vehicles. The A-10 also has a long range, able to fly up to 9,000 kilometers (5,590 miles) without refueling, and it can deliver a devastating payload of air-to-ground ordinance, including Maverick missiles, laser-guided bombs, and cluster bombs. The A-10 is also equipped with a variety of sensors and electronic warfare systems, including a forward-looking infrared camera, a laser designator and a high-speed data link, making it ideal for close air support missions in the most challenging combat environments. The A-10 has seen extensive use during the Gulf War, the war in Iraq and the war in Afghanistan, providing close air support to ground troops and engaging in a wide range of combat missions. It has been praised for its effectiveness and its ability to survive in the toughest conditions, and it remains a vital asset for the US Air Force and its allies.
I think my favourite non furry cosplay at a furry convention is the TF2 Spy with a paper mask depicting a generic furry OC on it.
Or so I'm led to believe. I have never seen one at a convention. Truly an unparalleled master of disguise.
He could be you.
He could be me.
He could even be-
Bomb voyage was at Megaplex last year