I think the brick 6 3 11 would've played better than the wheat 6 3 11 especially since you agreed to give up one with the brick being rare on this board and generally needing more brick as the road player,the game got saved by the devs
Genuine question: why is it not scamming to say that you will block someone all game if they solo you again, when in reality you won’t do it (you have said as long as you still have a chance you won’t do that sort of thing)? I ask because I know that you have a strict “no scamming” policy/belief when it comes to trades and non blocks, but in a way the threat of soloing for the rest of the game is a scam if it’s an empty threat. I get that it’s a “bluff”, but to me it seems like you are very strict on the no-scamming non blocks but ok with this sort of semi-“threat scam”. Just something to think about. Interested to hear if you haven’t considered this point of view, and I assume your take is that “it’s not the same as a non block scam” and so you don’t view it as a scam. I guess perhaps the argument is that it’s only a scam if an explicit deal is made, and a threat isn’t an explicit deal, but then I could argue that a threat (“if you do this then I’ll do this”) is in some ways a deal, too. Also- gg
@@ddddddbingbong a threat is not an agreement it’s table talk. also i was serious and blocked him anyways where i thought it would hurt him the most the rest of the game since he was leading
@@buddycatan Also if you Play any Game you want to have nicer People in it what keep it Civil if you have to stay on their Level it can destroy many more games and times. With a Threat or extra Rules you Reduce or Remove Bad Play and all can Play on Better
Wow what an insane game. My laptop would have been powered off after that millionth seven lmao
I think the brick 6 3 11 would've played better than the wheat 6 3 11 especially since you agreed to give up one with the brick being rare on this board and generally needing more brick as the road player,the game got saved by the devs
Buddy uploads, I click
wp! taking 8-5-10 was good call.
tried to watch my first game of catan for lols to learn, left so confused
Genuine question: why is it not scamming to say that you will block someone all game if they solo you again, when in reality you won’t do it (you have said as long as you still have a chance you won’t do that sort of thing)?
I ask because I know that you have a strict “no scamming” policy/belief when it comes to trades and non blocks, but in a way the threat of soloing for the rest of the game is a scam if it’s an empty threat. I get that it’s a “bluff”, but to me it seems like you are very strict on the no-scamming non blocks but ok with this sort of semi-“threat scam”.
Just something to think about. Interested to hear if you haven’t considered this point of view, and I assume your take is that “it’s not the same as a non block scam” and so you don’t view it as a scam. I guess perhaps the argument is that it’s only a scam if an explicit deal is made, and a threat isn’t an explicit deal, but then I could argue that a threat (“if you do this then I’ll do this”) is in some ways a deal, too.
Also- gg
@@ddddddbingbong a threat is not an agreement it’s table talk. also i was serious and blocked him anyways where i thought it would hurt him the most the rest of the game since he was leading
@@buddycatan yeah that makes sense. I still think there’s some parallel but it’s not the same as an agreement
@@buddycatan Also if you Play any Game you want to have nicer People in it what keep it Civil if you have to stay on their Level it can destroy many more games and times. With a Threat or extra Rules you Reduce or Remove Bad Play and all can Play on Better