@@keyweststeve3509 no he didn't. The voiceover does but, if you pay attention, a little further the person being interviewed says "transparent windows" at 45:24.
Are you saying they're smart so you choose to selfishly exploit their work for your gain or are you saying you're jealous of their brilliant, high profit ideas?
My favorite airline so far... great meal choices, fair legroom space great customer service very good entertainment...I know its an affiliate of Boeing but these guys go extra miles for passenger comfort.
20:18 “and that is the overall philosophy at Boeing, to have the pilot in full command of the airplane” Boeing 737 max MCAS system “hold my beer I got this.”
Boeing made a big mistake by purchasing McDonnell Douglas. The penny pinching mentality of the McD executives infected Boeing. The shoddy redesign of the 737 was the result.
"Hong Kong airport is on an 'island,' and is 'almost completely' surrounded by water." Peninsula is the word you are looking for. By definition, an "island" is COMPLETELY SURROUNDED by water! (That is why it is called an island.) What was that Tom Cruise movie, where he mentions, "you must have been absent the day they taught "law" in law school? This narrator must have been absent, the day they taught "simple geography" in geography class! steve
"the Boeing philosophy of allowing the pilot to have full command of the airplane" - if it were not for the last plane crashes of Boeing we would not realize how much they lie to us...
Ya ... as soon as I heard that idiot from Boeing start talking about pilots having full command, the first thing that came to my mind is the two recent deadly crashes thanks to software that gave them zero control.
MCAS isn’t on any other aircraft other than the 737 Max variants...so yea, Boeing planes allow pilots greater control over their plane. But seriously fuck them for the whole MCAS thing
Boeing lost its credibility and public trust. I'll never fly Boeing. Not only did Boeing knowingly allow dangerous aircraft to fly it also conspired to down play and limit the damage to its reputation. The FAA is no longer a leader in passenger safety its only interest is to protect psychopaths that run Boeing. Completely unacceptable.
@@iawarenow658 The reason the jet stalls is the jet engines are too far forwards. Boeing put the jet engines forward because they would not fit under the wing. To try to counteract the tendency to pitch up they devised a software solution that didnt work effectively. The jets erroneously pitched upwards which caused them to stall. The result was pilots wrestling the controls trying to nose down. That couldn't work because software was instructed to nose up. Ultimately the software solution caused the jets to crash.
I have been travelling for almost 30yrs now I can see what is really all about my longest flight is fro JOHANASBERG to SEDNEY almost 16hrs and the second is from CHGAGO TO DELHI and so on I really enjoyed THANK YOUSIR
Brand new Piper planes are coming with a feature where if the pilot becomes incapacitated, a passenger can push one Emergency Landing button and the autopilot lands by itself at the nearest airport and even contacts ATC. It's great because the pilot has a heart attack scenario is the stuff of nightmares.
Very interesting video!!! As for the building of the Airbus it reminds me of how I would build model airplanes or r/c planes only on a large ( really large ) scale!!! Sort of like a flight simulator aircraft building program!! True scale 1:1...facinating!!! Oh and as far as those controls... I'm sorry but I would want a joystick or a yoke or something I could wrap my hands around!! What if you were flying in turbulence or bumpy weather??? ....Maybe its just me...but I'm old school on somthing like that!!!
Newest feature from Boeing called "AUTO CRASH SYSTEM" that will automatically crash the plane right after take off , proven works perfectly on 2 of their 737 max
So harsh - but what the heck are we supposed to do about these sociopaths? Theyre making the same level of decisions which end up killing people, that they felt were necessary to get into and maintain the CEO position. And that worked, until it didnt. Although my guess is that the Boeing CEO that has lost his seat as the chairman of the board will be doing just fine once thisis out of the mainstream media. So really, could it be us all making a joke out of their tragic deaths by letting these people continue on their paths of terror? The joke is on us.
THAT WAS REALLY GOOD CALL -OUT ON BOEIG !! (I know it wasn't meant as "FUNNY" ) Boeing cut corners for $$ ,and gave us the "AUTO CRASH " Harshes way to describe it !!
@Paul Litchfield not the same software or issue. The 737 Max had a tendency for the nose to lift due to the extra power and high positioning of the engines. The software attempted to restore the aircraft behaviour to be consistent with earlier versions. The 787 is a completely new aircraft (as the Max should have been) and doesn't have the same issue and therefore no MCAS.
@Paul Litchfield MCAS came about because Boeing wanted the type certification for the 737 Max to be the same as other 737 variants so pilots didn't have to train for a new type certification. The Max should have been a whole new aircraft instead, but that would take too long and they would lose market share to Airbus. Sadly, the MCAS design failure has had the same result. Someone allowed a flawed piece of software to be used, and it has killed people. :( There's nothing physically wrong with the Max. It could be flown perfectly well without MCAS.
theharper1 Basically it’s what the the modern world has now become, profits and share holders first and foremost, everything else a lonely far second...
Airbus = Safety, Functionality, Practicality, well tested, easy to use for both crew and passengers, on-board comfort for passengers and better sleeping cabins for crew. Boeing = Bigger Windows, Bling, faster and more fuel efficient, Brand New leveling technology (read untested), more spacious seats with better recline, wall street winner.
@@nikobelic4251 Also true. We've arrived at an age where flaunting your ignorance is apparently something to be proud of rather than ashamed. Publishing a view that is totally the reverse of reality is kinda dumb. I'm sure that the pilots would be rather amused at the dea that in an emergency they no longer need to fly the plane !
pasoundman imagine being able to fly the plane and not have to train or practice for emergencies It would be amusing But it’s simply not and will never be the reality of flying.
I also was surprised. At 24:18 is shown TU-144. But at 24:14 and 24:16 It's something different than TU-144, because Tu-144 had delta wings, but variable-sweep wings on the video, like wings of TU-160 bomber.
Balazs Totfalusi That could be the Boeing 2707 concept which at first it was designed to have a variable sweep wing. But as problems were accumulating, they put aside at first the variable sweep wings and, as the financial support was running out, the concept itself. Boeing 2707 never saw the sky.
I often read or hear that Airbus test flights at Toulouse use the Airbus private airfield. I have often landed at Toulouse Blagnac, and never noticed, from the air, any runways other than those that are used by the scheduled flights I take. In this video we clearly see a building marked "Toulouse Blagnac". The Airbus which crashed during a test flight took off from Toulouse Blagnac and was intended to land at Toulouse Blagnac. There is an excellent video here on RUclips relating that accident. Worth watching, particularly if you believe that test pilots would never omit to respect safety considerations.) So, does anyone have any proof that Airbus has a private airfield at Toulouse?
I do hope the concept was only a pretty picture, and not a genuine proposal. The first and most obvious problem with the design is engine positioning. The intakes are in the perfect place to act as vacuum cleaners for every surface the plane moves across. They need to be mounted above or behind the wing to prevent FOD ingestion. However, the A350 is the most beautiful airliner since Concorde.
Maybe at this plant everything looks pretty cool and high tech but in the US poor quality of work. I’m really impressed with everything else I see about this plane. @19:40 Those chairs with the TV head rest are not safe
Oh MY GOD for a trip of 1800km's you will need 4500-5000 liters with 100 passangers!! Holly Molly, 5000 liter for my car is what it uses over 15 years or maybe more :)
I agree that they are improving the efficiency of the aircraft itself ..... in terms of quality and performance. However, the bottom line is, for commercial airlines, if this does not translate into passenger comfort and low cost, the entire efficiency and the performance of the aircraft is totally useless!! Passenger's comfort for a low cost is the key! Go figure this out and comeback with the passenger-comfort-and-low-cost-oriented information!!
I strongly dispute the "Most Modern Airliner" comment for the A350. I have flown in an A350 several times on long haul flights from Helsinki. (I really love the A350...) The 787 goes one better. The A350 is mostly "advanced" by the use of carbon fibre. But the 787 is all that and a much lighter electrical controlled, control surfaces, not just conventional hydraulic systems. As for avionics, different manufacturers, different concepts. But after the Air France A330 was mismanaged into the ocean while in flight from Brasil, Airbus did NOT skimp on the nose sensory redundancy. One AOA sensor on the MAX... (There is an old Italian word for that...)
It’s not about “Ha Ha”, you stupid little man, two aircraft were lost and hundreds of people lost their lives. It’s not about Airbus Vs Boeing, we all have to travel on aircraft made by both manufacturers, so the most important thing is safety. Boeing and Airbus are not a football team that you would support and hence be a fan, thus mocking and bantering with the other.
31:00 I think your animated video of the turbofan engine is inaccurate. The engine's fan moves in a counter-clockwise direction yet you show some compressor fan discs moving in the opposite direction. If they are all connected to the same shaft, then they'd be all moving counter-clockwise.
4 года назад
Also... a British or American route to Tokyo... if I’m gonna be a pilot one day that’s the route I wanna fly...
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
27:50 "As the research has shown, 1 inch makes all the difference"
What a legend.
Beat me too it xD
InstaBlaster
That's what my wife tells me
Thanks for breaking it down into elephant carry capacity. Made it a lot easier to understand.
Understandable due to your pfp
How amazing these people looking into the future of aviation and innovating the passengers experience and satisfaction. 👍
Wow....I had no idea how stressful the chefs jobs were and rest of the team... well done guys👏👏👏
The aircraft of the future will have transparent windows.... Wow that's visionary
Almost as crazy as airbus´s final assembly line having its own airport
Is the current one opaque 😂
Actually they said "transparent walls", not windows.
@@keyweststeve3509 no he didn't. The voiceover does but, if you pay attention, a little further the person being interviewed says "transparent windows" at 45:24.
In the future we will have a holographic Samuel L Jackson saving the day if a snake were to be discovered on a plane.
I see these video more than one time !!..
Beautiful Factory in Alemania !..
because of these smart men and women i am able to travel the world. thank you!!!!
Are you saying they're smart so you choose to selfishly exploit their work for your gain or are you saying you're jealous of their brilliant, high profit ideas?
My favorite airline so far... great meal choices, fair legroom space great customer service very good entertainment...I know its an affiliate of Boeing but these guys go extra miles for passenger comfort.
20:10 Yea right, pilot in command...
I saw that too! Sounds like the Boeing MCAS system.
Yea, that sentence didn't age well.
Great and informative videos as always 👍🏿👊🏿
20:18 “and that is the overall philosophy at Boeing, to have the pilot in full command of the airplane”
Boeing 737 max MCAS system “hold my beer I got this.”
Boeing is a shit. The old saying was ... ''if it's not Boeing I'm not going'' has become ''if it's a Boeing I'm not going''
@@peterpeterson5680 no, it's if it's not going I'm not Boeing
Read ADs dipshit, then talk
@@juicenot2481 ,
Sic 'em, @Jut Nie! lol
Boeing made a big mistake by purchasing McDonnell Douglas. The penny pinching mentality of the McD executives infected Boeing. The shoddy redesign of the 737 was the result.
Very exciting indeed!!
Great video!
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it
Imagine being THOSE pilots 🤗😊
Great video thanks for sharing
27:20 17" seats are obscene. 20 years ago the seats were 20" to 22" wide depending upon the class you were in.
Finally bro we been waiting for this to travel long distance in short time 👍
This Chanel make me know about more technical thing
Love from Nepal 🇳🇵
"Hong Kong airport is on an 'island,' and is
'almost completely' surrounded by water."
Peninsula is the word you are looking for.
By definition, an "island" is COMPLETELY
SURROUNDED by water! (That is why it is
called an island.)
What was that Tom Cruise movie, where he
mentions, "you must have been absent the
day they taught "law" in law school?
This narrator must have been absent, the day
they taught "simple geography" in geography
class!
steve
Good job thanks
Kudos. Thank you. AMEN.
"the Boeing philosophy of allowing the pilot to have full command of the airplane" - if it were not for the last plane crashes of Boeing we would not realize how much they lie to us...
Ya ... as soon as I heard that idiot from Boeing start talking about pilots having full command, the first thing that came to my mind is the two recent deadly crashes thanks to software that gave them zero control.
@@SnowTiger45 I bet he wishes he could take back those words. His idea of full control was actually no control whatsoever.
MCAS isn’t on any other aircraft other than the 737 Max variants...so yea, Boeing planes allow pilots greater control over their plane.
But seriously fuck them for the whole MCAS thing
Boeing became Boring !
It's a giant capitalistic corporation. You should have know that already.
26:45 The cabin pressure is HIGHER!
Lower cabin altitude.
Excellent video!
thanks to professionals Germans in der stadt Hamburg ,schöne Grüße von amiland 😊
Awesome Channel!!!...🤙😎🤘
Yes we all know about Boeing's anti-stall system don't we .
Well ......... They DIDN'T stall , did they ? ;-)
Boeing lost its credibility and public trust. I'll never fly Boeing. Not only did Boeing knowingly allow dangerous aircraft to fly it also conspired to down play and limit the damage to its reputation. The FAA is no longer a leader in passenger safety its only interest is to protect psychopaths that run Boeing. Completely unacceptable.
Theo Thistledon if it's Boeing I'm not going. If it's Airbus, I've got their trust.
if they teach the Pilots properly to fly planes without computers it seems that would of saved recent tragedies..
@@iawarenow658 The reason the jet stalls is the jet engines are too far forwards.
Boeing put the jet engines forward because they would not fit under the wing.
To try to counteract the tendency to pitch up they devised a software solution that didnt work effectively.
The jets erroneously pitched upwards which caused them to stall.
The result was pilots wrestling the controls trying to nose down.
That couldn't work because software was instructed to nose up.
Ultimately the software solution caused the jets to crash.
27:50 “ONE INCH MAKES ALL THE DIFFERENCE...”
THATS WHAT SHE SAID!
(Couldn’t resist)
I paused the video just for this. 🤣
This seems to have made all the teenage commentators' day, over and over and over. We get it...get it?
NICE.!!! THANK YOU VERY MUCH (AIR BUS.. FULL DOCUMENTARY .)👍👍💙💜💚💛
I love this video, it eliminate fear of flying
boeing production heads should take a peek at this, i doubt they are as efficient. that electrical installation looks very smart.
Awesome works 👍🏽 nice video . 😎
Fascinating what man can accomplish when we work together.
Jermans are the best breed on earth... Absolute genius and innovators
racist
Nice super uppp documentriyyy 👌👌👌👌👌
A bunch of smart people
We all hope
I have been travelling for almost 30yrs now I can see what is really all about my longest flight is fro JOHANASBERG to SEDNEY almost 16hrs and the second is from CHGAGO TO DELHI and so on I really enjoyed THANK YOUSIR
Brand new Piper planes are coming with a feature where if the pilot becomes incapacitated, a passenger can push one Emergency Landing button and the autopilot lands by itself at the nearest airport and even contacts ATC. It's great because the pilot has a heart attack scenario is the stuff of nightmares.
It's already introduced in cirrus mini jet.
20:15 Enter MCAS
Anwesh Kar Enter Sandman. Enter the Dragon. End to Boeing.
"Мечты, мечты, где ваша сладость?!"
"Advanced stall correction" sounds so high tech. Isn't that exactly what caused those two Boeing crashes? That plane is grounded now.
@Robert Muldoon sounds ruff.
@Robert Muldoon Aren't Indians better at this?
ruclips.net/video/VjbjnuFApKg/видео.html
Difference is pilots in Airbus are trained to handle Airbus version of MCAS and their MCAS will throw error message if two sensors data dont match.
@Robert Muldoon Yes, chinese == crap hardware, indians == crap software.. but if you combine))..
20:12 Ya think he jinxed himself with the 737 MAX issues right after this recording?
GREAT ENGINEERING
Watcher, I am here
Very interesting video!!! As for the building of the Airbus it reminds me of how I would build model airplanes or r/c planes only on a large ( really large ) scale!!! Sort of like a flight simulator aircraft building program!! True scale 1:1...facinating!!! Oh and as far as those controls... I'm sorry but I would want a joystick or a yoke or something I could wrap my hands around!! What if you were flying in turbulence or bumpy weather???
....Maybe its just me...but I'm old school on somthing like that!!!
Wow roll royce engine nice.
One inch definitely makes a difference. Lol 😉😂
Gotta hit that SPOT!
Especially if you have 10 of them😁✔️
Newest feature from Boeing called "AUTO CRASH SYSTEM" that will automatically crash the plane right after take off , proven works perfectly on 2 of their 737 max
Yeah, 'cause plane crashes happen waaay more than car crashes, right? People like you are so annoying.
Love Diecast Details good job you made a joke about alot of people dying
So harsh - but what the heck are we supposed to do about these sociopaths? Theyre making the same level of decisions which end up killing people, that they felt were necessary to get into and maintain the CEO position. And that worked, until it didnt. Although my guess is that the Boeing CEO that has lost his seat as the chairman of the board will be doing just fine once thisis out of the mainstream media. So really, could it be us all making a joke out of their tragic deaths by letting these people continue on their paths of terror? The joke is on us.
Boeing has another feature with their 797, it's having just one pilot instead of two. Great idea👌.
THAT WAS REALLY GOOD CALL -OUT ON BOEIG !! (I know it wasn't meant as "FUNNY" ) Boeing cut corners for $$ ,and gave us the "AUTO CRASH " Harshes way to describe it !!
34:19 is my favorite bit of info. "HK Intl Airport lies on an island and is almost completely surrounded by water". Hmm
Epic
Good docs but the script/commentary is a bit grating at times! "A.F.T door", hmm I think they meant aft door!
Mark Davis daft narrator. Or is that d. a. f. t. narrator?
And the supersonic model was tested in the wind channel, Doh
I love German greetings from Puerto princesa city Philippines
The new fly looks very beautiful
27:52 this is a man of culture one inch certainly is a big difference between micro and magnum
people have been waiting for future concept aircraft for over 50 years now. Not much has changed in shape.
That's a significant capital expenditure!
You should change the tittle "AIRBUS EXCEPTIONAL INVENTIONS"
20:20, except when it comes to the 737MAX?
20:10 “787 has enhanced stall protection” might that be what killed all those passengers?
This is a B787 DreamLiner not a B737 Max
@Paul Litchfield not the same software or issue. The 737 Max had a tendency for the nose to lift due to the extra power and high positioning of the engines. The software attempted to restore the aircraft behaviour to be consistent with earlier versions. The 787 is a completely new aircraft (as the Max should have been) and doesn't have the same issue and therefore no MCAS.
@Paul Litchfield MCAS came about because Boeing wanted the type certification for the 737 Max to be the same as other 737 variants so pilots didn't have to train for a new type certification. The Max should have been a whole new aircraft instead, but that would take too long and they would lose market share to Airbus. Sadly, the MCAS design failure has had the same result. Someone allowed a flawed piece of software to be used, and it has killed people. :( There's nothing physically wrong with the Max. It could be flown perfectly well without MCAS.
theharper1 Basically it’s what the the modern world has now become, profits and share holders first and foremost, everything else a lonely far second...
Airbus = Safety, Functionality, Practicality, well tested, easy to use for both crew and passengers, on-board comfort for passengers and better sleeping cabins for crew.
Boeing = Bigger Windows, Bling, faster and more fuel efficient, Brand New leveling technology (read untested), more spacious seats with better recline, wall street winner.
bigger, more powerful, shiny but total shit ..basically american
German best country & manufacture too 💯🇩🇪
i love boeing
The most useful feature was auto seat-belt checking. Just a summary LED on a panel. Save the crew walking up and down before every flight.
Grabeng Bansa naman ito, factory lang ng mga eroplano....
'In an emergency, the aircraft's automatic systems take over' - actually no they don't.
Lol ikr
Most media don’t understand what they are talking about....
@@nikobelic4251 Also true. We've arrived at an age where flaunting your ignorance is apparently something to be proud of rather than ashamed. Publishing a view that is totally the reverse of reality is kinda dumb. I'm sure that the pilots would be rather amused at the dea that in an emergency they no longer need to fly the plane !
pasoundman imagine being able to fly the plane and not have to train or practice for emergencies
It would be amusing
But it’s simply not and will never be the reality of flying.
Turn the rear rudder and rear wing downwards and find doubled speed for a400
23;41 WOW IT CAN fly upside down
Hey guys! You make really interesting content! Thank you! I had noticed that you shown tu-144 airplane but did not refer that it was tu-144! :(
TU-144 and the supersonic bomber Tu-160 shown as Concorde. What the hell!
Love PIA airline...
Am I the only one that noticed when it said about Concorde, it actually showed some footage of the TU144 instead? 🤓
I was very confused too
Russians meddling
I saw that too in an old video a while back!!!
I also was surprised. At 24:18 is shown TU-144. But at 24:14 and 24:16 It's something different than TU-144, because Tu-144 had delta wings, but variable-sweep wings on the video, like wings of TU-160 bomber.
Balazs Totfalusi That could be the Boeing 2707 concept which at first it was designed to have a variable sweep wing. But as problems were accumulating, they put aside at first the variable sweep wings and, as the financial support was running out, the concept itself. Boeing 2707 never saw the sky.
24:09 talks about Concorde.. Shows TU-144.. RIP
Nice video, hope aviation continues to improve, the personal rides look the most interesting! Cheers. 👏
16:37 man really called it “the joystick”
and?
@@blazing5925 it’s not called a joystick...
@@YoFlikz you can call it joystick?
@@blazing5925 sure, but it’s incorrect
His mind was on video consoles...
my dream is to work in this company.i love airbus.
I often read or hear that Airbus test flights at Toulouse use the Airbus private airfield. I have often landed at Toulouse Blagnac, and never noticed, from the air, any runways other than those that are used by the scheduled flights I take. In this video we clearly see a building marked "Toulouse Blagnac". The Airbus which crashed during a test flight took off from Toulouse Blagnac and was intended to land at Toulouse Blagnac. There is an excellent video here on RUclips relating that accident. Worth watching, particularly if you believe that test pilots would never omit to respect safety considerations.)
So, does anyone have any proof that Airbus has a private airfield at Toulouse?
31:00 "... Pretty and Whitney engine..." The triple 7 freighter uses the GE90. Come on.
I need to buy one
the ad's are killing this
There is such a thing called ad blocker, you know?
I do hope the concept was only a pretty picture, and not a genuine proposal. The first and most obvious problem with the design is engine positioning. The intakes are in the perfect place to act as vacuum cleaners for every surface the plane moves across. They need to be mounted above or behind the wing to prevent FOD ingestion.
However, the A350 is the most beautiful airliner since Concorde.
Maybe at this plant everything looks pretty cool and high tech but in the US poor quality of work. I’m really impressed with everything else I see about this plane. @19:40 Those chairs with the TV head rest are not safe
From 39:24 I like the soft background sound. Please refer the link?
27:51 thats what i've been telling her but she doesnt believe me
Oh MY GOD for a trip of 1800km's you will need 4500-5000 liters with 100 passangers!! Holly Molly, 5000 liter for my car is what it uses over 15 years or maybe more :)
Keep the blimp floating light, it's good to add a high level manual emergency engine. TASH8 PROP JET.
That new airplane smell 😂
I agree that they are improving the efficiency of the aircraft itself ..... in terms of quality and performance. However, the bottom line is, for commercial airlines, if this does not translate into passenger comfort and low cost, the entire efficiency and the performance of the aircraft is totally useless!! Passenger's comfort for a low cost is the key! Go figure this out and comeback with the passenger-comfort-and-low-cost-oriented information!!
Won't be long, it's inevitable.
I strongly dispute the "Most Modern Airliner" comment for the A350. I have flown in an A350 several times on long haul flights from Helsinki. (I really love the A350...) The 787 goes one better. The A350 is mostly "advanced" by the use of carbon fibre. But the 787 is all that and a much lighter electrical controlled, control surfaces, not just conventional hydraulic systems. As for avionics, different manufacturers, different concepts. But after the Air France A330 was mismanaged into the ocean while in flight from Brasil, Airbus did NOT skimp on the nose sensory redundancy. One AOA sensor on the MAX... (There is an old Italian word for that...)
Airbus used to scoff at Boeing using 2 engines on their long range widebody planes. Now they are going in that direction with the 350.
Airbus built the first twin engined widebody The A300 B.
"the pilot [is] in full command of the capability of the airplane" -- HAHA Boeing. How'd that work on the 737 SUPERMAX for ya?
It’s not about “Ha Ha”, you stupid little man, two aircraft were lost and hundreds of people lost their lives. It’s not about Airbus Vs Boeing, we all have to travel on aircraft made by both manufacturers, so the most important thing is safety. Boeing and Airbus are not a football team that you would support and hence be a fan, thus mocking and bantering with the other.
We should be looking at nature for improving design.
Superb video absolutely superb. The things that humans have to look forward to our truly amazing.
31:00 GE or Pratt and Whitney?
Cuz the 777f uses GE-90 115 or 110B engines....
That's what I'm wondering 🤔
Awesome accept that this a shark not a fish !
The 747 has regain her reign as the world largest passenger aircraft! What a waist of money and time for the A380 as they re being scraped!
wow
Airbus: I *love* you !!
31:00 I think your animated video of the turbofan engine is inaccurate. The engine's fan moves in a counter-clockwise direction yet you show some compressor fan discs moving in the opposite direction. If they are all connected to the same shaft, then they'd be all moving counter-clockwise.
Also... a British or American route to Tokyo... if I’m gonna be a pilot one day that’s the route I wanna fly...
I would love to see airbus and boeing have a go at the supersonic business jets....