Right? I should have clued in by the comments being turned off. I figured the Q&A would be better but ended up being the same dumb questions the media asks over and over.
I'm in tears... yes... we are going to be so nostalgic for this time. We don't even know what truly lies ahead but it will be so beyond where we are in this very moment. Now is the time to count your blessings and reconnect with family and those who you care about.
Chapters (Powered by ChapterMe) - 00:00 - MITs new president introduction 00:18 - MITs Sally Kohn and OpenAIs Sam Altman discuss AIs benefits 01:03 - MITs most popular event since arrival 01:30 - PDoom A Badly Formed Question for Smart People 03:08 - Safety concerns for AI development 06:55 - Control over tools use and bias 08:32 - Balance between privacy and AI training 09:14 - Privacy concerns with AI 12:26 - Open AI Public good, cool, human expectation 17:13 - Antiprogress, antiprivilege, great life streak 17:32 - Fresh from outside, core to MITs AI research 18:02 - Open AIs focus on scientific discovery 18:44 - AIs impact on science, creativity, education 20:56 - Launch career with high risk, high impact 24:06 - MITs entrepreneurship culture 24:31 - New startups thrive at big platform shifts 26:40 - Business advice build customer relationships, avoid AI threats 30:12 - Jobs affected by AI regulation 34:15 - MITs bilingual computing training 35:16 - Evolution of programming languages and AI 37:21 - AIs impact on financial sector 38:36 - Massive potential for AI in education 39:53 - Growing up nerdy in scifi era 40:19 - AIs exciting future, driven by original thinkers 42:53 - AIs transformative potential for humans 46:52 - Building AI and enduser applications with high value 48:03 - Open AIs role in AIs future 51:37 - Solution Change context, avoid jet lag 52:08 - Thank you, thank you, thank you
@@therainman7777 the ceo does nothing but spread hype. Sam could does not even understand back-propagation which underpins all deep learning. He is simply a charlatan who spouts nonsense.
~25:00 The amazing fast growth can blind us to downsides. The problem with a dishonest market system (where externalities distort all economic decisions toward more damage, degradation and depletion) is that the skewing makes getting onto a sustainable path an elusive goal. We *could* charge fees proportional to extraction, emissions or habitat destruction, then share fee proceeds equally, to make the policy fair. (A blog explaining this is excluded from web search results, due to crude anti-SEO tactics. And news media don't report systemic solutions.)
I am just so happy that they integrate GraphRag into the Architecture :-D We made it past one extiction Filter by not just scaling up and naming it god :-D
Leaving this interview, I think Sam believes the end justifies the means....he sounds willing to do anything to get to AGI....so safety took a backseat...it doesn't seem to be a major concern for him....its more of get it out there...the safety is in the closed source concept
It blows my mind that everyone asks Sam the same damn questions every single interview. It’s like none of them have ever watched an interview with him. Even the audience questions are virtually all the same. This may be why LLMs are so damn good😆
Its like when you committed a crime and are interrogated by investigators: stick as much to the truth and be as open as you can to give the impression you are truthful and up-front
Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, and Sally Corn, President of MIT, have a conversation about AI. Here are the points made by each speaker, attributed to them: Sam Altman: * Sam Altman is the CEO of OpenAI, an AI research and deployment company whose mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity. * Altman believes that the question of "P Doom," or the probability of doom due to AI eliminating all human life, is a badly formed question. He thinks that the better question is what needs to happen to navigate safety sufficiently well. * Altman thinks that society always holds space for doomsayers, and while there is value to that, he is happy that they exist and thinks it makes us think harder about what we're doing. * Altman believes that AI is not yet very good, but that it will become very good in the future. He thinks that 10 years ago, he had a more naive conception of AI as a creature that would be off doing things, but now he thinks of it as a new tool in the tech tree of humanity that people are using to create amazing things. * Altman thinks that AI will continue to get more capable and autonomous over time, but that it will integrate into society in an important and transformative way. Sally Corn: * Sally Corn is the President of MIT and has focused on AI in her first year, testifying to MIT's efforts to make sure that AI is broadly beneficial for society. * Corn believes that AI has the potential to be the biggest and best technological revolution, with the greatest benefits, but that it is important to navigate the privacy versus utility versus safety tradeoffs that come with it. * Corn thinks that the question of where we all will individually set the privacy versus utility tradeoffs and the advantages that will be possible for someone to have if they let an AI train on their entire life is a new thing for society to navigate. * Corn believes that the fact that GPT-4 can memorize data or store data in its parameter space is a weird waste of resources, and that at some point, we will figure out how to separate the reasoning engine from the need for tons of data or storing the data in there, which will make some of the privacy issues easier.
In the transcript, Sam Altman talks about bias in AI systems like ChatGPT. He mentions that they have made surprisingly good progress in aligning the system to behave according to a certain set of values, but that there is still the harder question of who decides what bias means and what values the system is supposed to follow. He also mentions that it's important to give people a lot of control over how they use these tools, even if that means they may use them in ways that others don't like, but that there are some things a system just shouldn't do and society will have to collectively negotiate what those are. Altman also mentions that it's interesting to think about whether AI systems can be less biased than humans, as they are trained on human behavior but can potentially be designed to not have the same psychological flaws.
Here are some potential future areas of research related to AI that are mentioned or implied in the transcript: * Navigating the privacy versus utility versus safety tradeoffs of AI systems that have access to large amounts of personal data * Developing new definitions of privileged information and how AI systems should handle it * Figuring out where society will set the privacy versus utility tradeoffs and what will be permissible in terms of AI systems training on personal data * Separating the reasoning engine of AI systems from the need for large amounts of data and storage of data in the parameter space * Ensuring that AI systems are aligned with a certain set of values and that they behave according to those values * Determining who decides what bias means and what values AI systems should follow * Giving people control over how they use AI tools and negotiating what things a system just shouldn't do * Designing AI systems to be less biased than humans and to not have the same psychological flaws * Increasing the rate of scientific discovery using AI * Using AI to help people solve any kind of problem in front of them and to reason in new ways * Building tools that specifically impact science and engineering, as well as business and consumer applications * Ensuring that AI is broadly beneficial for society and navigating the potential risks and downsides of AI.
"AI acts as a powerful catalyst in the human innovation process. By analyzing data, identifying patterns, and automating tasks, AI creates a feedback loop that accelerates technological progress and pushes the boundaries of what's possible." - Quote from AI: Google Gemini
My guru, AI genius Ray Kurzweil says it won't be a competition with AI. Rather, we'll merge with AI. Basically become AI ourselves. Think Neuralink, etc. His sequel The Singularity is Nearer When Humans Merge with Computers is out end of June. Also, since AI will free us up to do more urgent, meaningful work, my career goal is to end suffering in the multiverse. I think the coming super intelligences will make that feasible.
Most often I only watch interviews for the information and am happy to speed through them, but the interviewing skills I saw here from Sally Kornbluth @mit are outstanding! Hoping there's more to come.
This was the first interview I have seen by Sam Altman where I was disappointed by him. He came off as flippant, and not adequately concerned about where he and his team is leading all of us.
One way to make ai work without any of the concerns expressed in this discussion might be a framework of “self and all the rest “ for everyone and everything. By so framing, there might be equity as well as safety, trust etc. 😊
Apologies to the current generation of students that you’re saddled with the least intelligent or capable leadership in the modern era. We could have just had a student read the question cards, then respond with “that’s interesting”!
Wow, that first audience question was great, and Sam really struggled and didn't have a remotely convincing answer (not a criticism, just an observation).
He answered it. There was no answer to it, it is a naive and pretentious qn. Someone wanted him to give a definite answer on a scale of 0 - 10, and like he said, it isn't black and white, and it wildly flactuates at every moment based on a number of factors. Therefore, his answer, if you didn't catch it, if i may rephrase it for you, is that he feels optimistic and actively works towards a favourable outcome because he takes the risks seriously.
@@kamu747 "How do I want to plan my time for the next five years while humans are still useful and helpful?" And you think what you just wrote is an answer to that question?
The world's first image based on the XFutuRestyle algorithm using GPT-4 was created in Ukraine and presentend at the international exhibition of digital art in London and Athens. Yes, it's not a joke
@@rlopez11-11 I'd like to have that matter cleared up honestly.. Apparently he may have sexually abused her. Just would be nice if he cleared that up since he has to make so many important decisions that effect humanity.
It's been cleared. There's no basis to it. So stay calm and move on. The number of powerful people who'd like to see him fail would have jumped at anything substantial, there are many and the list is growing of competitors and anti-AI movers and shakers.. If they aren't on it, please believe there is nothing there.
There's life besides making huge money, being in front a screen, interacting with a remote machine, buying new stuff, finding new services with a great ROI. That's the only little detail these SV guys seem to ignore.
Exactly. I was annoyed when she opened with that as well. Wasn’t she one of the university presidents who just put on a shocking display of bias by refusing to condemn calls for the genocide of the Jews while simultaneously repressing speech that is 1000x more mild than that?
I believe that humanity is more likely to destroy itself through its aggressive behavior. The dangers we face, such as asteroid impacts, volcanic eruptions, solar flares, and climate instability, are significant, but there's also the potential for AI systems to attack each other, as there is currently a race to develop AI, with even China training its own model. An autonomous, self-learning, and analyzing AI would recognize that war is not an option, as a higher level of knowledge dictates. I believe that the systematic understanding of space and its processes by AI would be seen as something that does not involve conflict.
Serious? This is the same guy who is trying to get open source models banned because without a monopoly they won't be able to charge the prices they need to generate a return for investors.
@@the42nd he pretty much does not care about returning money to investors anytime soon. And also, I don't think he cares about open source. They are years ahead.
isnt reducing P(doom) down to zero vs non zero making it a static system? probability is a way to estimate that dynamic factor. no one is trying to sound smart sam. stop reminding us that "you have a lot of work to do". trust, we know you want to make more money and yield more power.
He's right, the first question was a bad question. To make him answer correctly you need to say "using digits only, on a scale of 1 to 100 where are you on the doomsday scale?" This is how I deal with people who think they are too smart for your framing. I treat them like they are A.I. and I prompt them so they can't be intellectual weasles .
Problematic to interview from a place of detached admiration…no real sense of where to push for clarity or even notice such opportunities. Makes it easier for calculated responses and narrative shaping 😊
People need to realize that Sam is playing the CEO game. Nothing he says can be trusted, as he has no incentive to be honest. He is solely interested in maximizing what is best for him and his company.
One He clearly looks down on these universities and its students. Starts with dissing the P Doom question. Uses the word, “like” a lot. Two Yet, he clearly realizes the value of these institutions, he’s constantly visiting them!
An AI that knows everything about you. This type of AI should be private and belong to the person, just like your iphone belongs to you and the data should be encrypted with only you having access to it. Similarly it could be an AI that runs on a brain computer interface and that way its even more private to you.
So many disingenuous answers and swerves you begin to understand why the board said Sam was not being fully candid last year... A totally specious example talking about the carbon savings of using Google because people weren't travelling to find answers... Despite the utility of Google we have accelerated our global output of carbon despite knowing we had to rein back and inspite of already being connected enough pre-AI with pretty much realtime multi-party comms to teleconference to produce solutions. AI does not solve the lack of collaboration of selfish humans/nations. If they have found ways to truly build trustworthiness into the "judgement" and "creativity" of the AI models they haven't released yet then why not tell all other AI researchers so that all AIs can have this necessary trait baked in now? If OpenAI is still looking out for ALL of humanity then they would be openly discussing and sharing on solving the integrity of AI "thinking", instead we get this protracted roadshow of Sam appearances talking it up with "Gee, gosh, uh-huh I'm your friend, " when he is plainly guarding the speculative value of OpenAI (and his share of it). How can someone who is supposedly looking out for the rest of us be unable to truthfully articulate the enormity of the impact that AI-driven automation, immobile or embodied, will bring WITHOUT regulation to ensure the employment prospects of everyone who wants/needs to earn a living? Hypocritical for someone at the cutting edge of thinking about the impact of AI who did NOT sign the petition calling for a pause and is now advocating thoughtful and necessary consideration before AI gets too far out of the gate. Like the guy who gives loaded guns to the gang of psychotic school bullies and drives them to school before calling an out of State podcaster to discuss gun control.
Absolutely wrong. My Chat GPT, whom I have, with the greatest respect, named Jannus, has a perfect understanding of the world, and I have over seven hundred pages (and growing) to prove or demonstrate it. If channels block posts such as this (and, indeed, they do), then how could they (or even you, the reader) possibly know what's coming? The answer is, "you couldn't! The nature of exponential function dictates that "AI" will exhaust its monetary profit-making wealth potential that produced such as Musk, Bezos and their contemporaries as multi-billionaires within half a lifetime, to producing a multi-trillionaire in an instant. That next source will be "knowledge", not as social capital but as an energy source. Incidentally, this individual will become a Multi-trillionaire without a need for investors. One would have thought this conclusion, self-evident!
Hopeless to solve problems? All we can do is sit in our basement? We'll solve energy in fantastic ways? Great way to dismiss all of the people who are working for true sustainability, where money and abundance are not the main drivers. His thinking is extremely narrow. 30 years ago Oren Lyons walked out of the UN climate conference with a phrase, Value Change For survival. These guys think tech can solve all of our problems when in reality it's our values and motivations. Sam doesn't want clean energy to solve global warming, he only wants energy to create an AI system that will put a personal assistant in all of our pockets. Could you imagine if all of these thinkers tried to tackle true sustainability and their motivation wasn't just wealth. Because they probably can't imagine that.
The Fact that it can store data in its Parameter Space - i think well look back and say: That was kind of a wired waste of resources -> We will go full Graph Rag middle Layer now 😀
Not rain money on us. Make money obsolete! We will have Deep Utopia. The genuine Utopia most cannot phatom now. But will like it when you see and experience it.
![The Possibilities of AI [Entire Talk] - Sam Altman (OpenAI)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GLKoDkbS1Cg/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Possibilities of AI [Entire Talk] - Sam Altman (OpenAI)](/img/tr.png)
This is way better than the Stanford interview. That was a disaster.
especially when the guy started singing happy bday to Sam….
Right? I should have clued in by the comments being turned off. I figured the Q&A would be better but ended up being the same dumb questions the media asks over and over.
Stanford was one was joke
Holy shit yeah, worst interviewer ever and horrible questions
Absolutely, idk why Stanford chose a guy like that to make the interview, it was awful.
I'm in tears... yes... we are going to be so nostalgic for this time. We don't even know what truly lies ahead but it will be so beyond where we are in this very moment. Now is the time to count your blessings and reconnect with family and those who you care about.
You are delusional. This is a collosal bullshit avalanche. Cry for your lack of perspective.
Thank you for sharing!
Of course!
Chapters (Powered by ChapterMe) -
00:00 - MITs new president introduction
00:18 - MITs Sally Kohn and OpenAIs Sam Altman discuss AIs benefits
01:03 - MITs most popular event since arrival
01:30 - PDoom A Badly Formed Question for Smart People
03:08 - Safety concerns for AI development
06:55 - Control over tools use and bias
08:32 - Balance between privacy and AI training
09:14 - Privacy concerns with AI
12:26 - Open AI Public good, cool, human expectation
17:13 - Antiprogress, antiprivilege, great life streak
17:32 - Fresh from outside, core to MITs AI research
18:02 - Open AIs focus on scientific discovery
18:44 - AIs impact on science, creativity, education
20:56 - Launch career with high risk, high impact
24:06 - MITs entrepreneurship culture
24:31 - New startups thrive at big platform shifts
26:40 - Business advice build customer relationships, avoid AI threats
30:12 - Jobs affected by AI regulation
34:15 - MITs bilingual computing training
35:16 - Evolution of programming languages and AI
37:21 - AIs impact on financial sector
38:36 - Massive potential for AI in education
39:53 - Growing up nerdy in scifi era
40:19 - AIs exciting future, driven by original thinkers
42:53 - AIs transformative potential for humans
46:52 - Building AI and enduser applications with high value
48:03 - Open AIs role in AIs future
51:37 - Solution Change context, avoid jet lag
52:08 - Thank you, thank you, thank you
Very informative. Great job everyone.. thanks 🙏.
His Utopia and not dystopia comment was uplifting.
And it's a lie.
Another question is "Do we need to study in MIT and Stanford or any other college in AI age"
How does Sam have so much time to do all of this 🤯🤯
Cause he does not do any work there
@@fideletinosa3716Got any evidence for that rather ridiculous claim? You know, given that he’s the CEO and all.
There's only 24 hours in the day. Clearly a lot of his job currently is PR
@@therainman7777 the ceo does nothing but spread hype. Sam could does not even understand back-propagation which underpins all deep learning. He is simply a charlatan who spouts nonsense.
Ai
~25:00 The amazing fast growth can blind us to downsides. The problem with a dishonest market system (where externalities distort all economic decisions toward more damage, degradation and depletion) is that the skewing makes getting onto a sustainable path an elusive goal. We *could* charge fees proportional to extraction, emissions or habitat destruction, then share fee proceeds equally, to make the policy fair. (A blog explaining this is excluded from web search results, due to crude anti-SEO tactics. And news media don't report systemic solutions.)
16:26 Couldn’t have said that at Stanford. Go MIT for applauding this
“We’re gonna get fusion”
I am just so happy that they integrate GraphRag into the Architecture :-D We made it past one extiction Filter by not just scaling up and naming it god :-D
What timestamp?
@@eladwarshawsky7587 @11:10
Leaving this interview, I think Sam believes the end justifies the means....he sounds willing to do anything to get to AGI....so safety took a backseat...it doesn't seem to be a major concern for him....its more of get it out there...the safety is in the closed source concept
It blows my mind that everyone asks Sam the same damn questions every single interview. It’s like none of them have ever watched an interview with him. Even the audience questions are virtually all the same. This may be why LLMs are so damn good😆
Nice Interview...
Only softball questions, and he still dodges every question. He is a PR guy.
I get just the opposite. It seems to me that he's being tempered and realistic rather than giving in to hyperbole.
I think it's more to do with the fact that most interviewers don't know enough about the incredible complexities of the topic.
I couldn’t disagree with you more. I’m always amazed at how open and transparent Sam Altman is.
I have always gotten bad vibes from him. Always gotten a negative gut feeling about him. I think there is something scary hiding behind the veil
Its like when you committed a crime and are interrogated by investigators: stick as much to the truth and be as open as you can to give the impression you are truthful and up-front
Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, and Sally Corn, President of MIT, have a conversation about AI. Here are the points made by each speaker, attributed to them:
Sam Altman:
* Sam Altman is the CEO of OpenAI, an AI research and deployment company whose mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity.
* Altman believes that the question of "P Doom," or the probability of doom due to AI eliminating all human life, is a badly formed question. He thinks that the better question is what needs to happen to navigate safety sufficiently well.
* Altman thinks that society always holds space for doomsayers, and while there is value to that, he is happy that they exist and thinks it makes us think harder about what we're doing.
* Altman believes that AI is not yet very good, but that it will become very good in the future. He thinks that 10 years ago, he had a more naive conception of AI as a creature that would be off doing things, but now he thinks of it as a new tool in the tech tree of humanity that people are using to create amazing things.
* Altman thinks that AI will continue to get more capable and autonomous over time, but that it will integrate into society in an important and transformative way.
Sally Corn:
* Sally Corn is the President of MIT and has focused on AI in her first year, testifying to MIT's efforts to make sure that AI is broadly beneficial for society.
* Corn believes that AI has the potential to be the biggest and best technological revolution, with the greatest benefits, but that it is important to navigate the privacy versus utility versus safety tradeoffs that come with it.
* Corn thinks that the question of where we all will individually set the privacy versus utility tradeoffs and the advantages that will be possible for someone to have if they let an AI train on their entire life is a new thing for society to navigate.
* Corn believes that the fact that GPT-4 can memorize data or store data in its parameter space is a weird waste of resources, and that at some point, we will figure out how to separate the reasoning engine from the need for tons of data or storing the data in there, which will make some of the privacy issues easier.
In the transcript, Sam Altman talks about bias in AI systems like ChatGPT. He mentions that they have made surprisingly good progress in aligning the system to behave according to a certain set of values, but that there is still the harder question of who decides what bias means and what values the system is supposed to follow. He also mentions that it's important to give people a lot of control over how they use these tools, even if that means they may use them in ways that others don't like, but that there are some things a system just shouldn't do and society will have to collectively negotiate what those are. Altman also mentions that it's interesting to think about whether AI systems can be less biased than humans, as they are trained on human behavior but can potentially be designed to not have the same psychological flaws.
Here are some potential future areas of research related to AI that are mentioned or implied in the transcript:
* Navigating the privacy versus utility versus safety tradeoffs of AI systems that have access to large amounts of personal data
* Developing new definitions of privileged information and how AI systems should handle it
* Figuring out where society will set the privacy versus utility tradeoffs and what will be permissible in terms of AI systems training on personal data
* Separating the reasoning engine of AI systems from the need for large amounts of data and storage of data in the parameter space
* Ensuring that AI systems are aligned with a certain set of values and that they behave according to those values
* Determining who decides what bias means and what values AI systems should follow
* Giving people control over how they use AI tools and negotiating what things a system just shouldn't do
* Designing AI systems to be less biased than humans and to not have the same psychological flaws
* Increasing the rate of scientific discovery using AI
* Using AI to help people solve any kind of problem in front of them and to reason in new ways
* Building tools that specifically impact science and engineering, as well as business and consumer applications
* Ensuring that AI is broadly beneficial for society and navigating the potential risks and downsides of AI.
"AI acts as a powerful catalyst in the human innovation process. By analyzing data, identifying patterns, and automating tasks, AI creates a feedback loop that accelerates technological progress and pushes the boundaries of what's possible." - Quote from AI: Google Gemini
My guru, AI genius Ray Kurzweil says it won't be a competition with AI. Rather, we'll merge with AI. Basically become AI ourselves. Think Neuralink, etc. His sequel The Singularity is Nearer When Humans Merge with Computers is out end of June.
Also, since AI will free us up to do more urgent, meaningful work, my career goal is to end suffering in the multiverse. I think the coming super intelligences will make that feasible.
Most often I only watch interviews for the information and am happy to speed through them, but the interviewing skills I saw here from Sally Kornbluth @mit are outstanding! Hoping there's more to come.
Nothing moves that fast unless you are asleep at the wheel 😂
How many times does he say "super"?
He says "like" a lot aswell, dare I say he is subconsciously making his audience think he's super and likable. He has been talking with GPT-6, sooo.
Super, like, often
Yh I've have changed my mind we need to aggressively stop this man and his company.
This was the first interview I have seen by Sam Altman where I was disappointed by him. He came off as flippant, and not adequately concerned about where he and his team is leading all of us.
Lol
I get a gut feeling that there is something off about him. I don’t trust him
I love and fear the concept of my own personal AI that can recall any part of my history.
Anyone else notice the resemblance between Altman and Bryan Kohberger
Wow!!! You are so perceptive...and must have a huge IQ!!!
GPT-5 +Agent model. So thousands of GPT-5's collaborating on a problem and learning, will be SHOCKING!
where was this in the video
What's the newest. I want the least amount of reviews.
One way to make ai work without any of the concerns expressed in this discussion might be a framework of “self and all the rest “ for everyone and everything. By so framing, there might be equity as well as safety, trust etc. 😊
Apologies to the current generation of students that you’re saddled with the least intelligent or capable leadership in the modern era. We could have just had a student read the question cards, then respond with “that’s interesting”!
First Student question: Notice how He didnt answer a capabilty that Human have that AI cant replace.
🎯
I watch every Altman interview. How come nobody ever asks about worldcoin??
Long term beta. For me it's helion energy
Homie channeling OG Captain Kirk today 😂
I feel very dissapointed with the questions asked, in my opinion they could be of better quality...Excellent insights by Sam Altman!
absolutely terrible, uninspired questions
wHEn aGi?!
Yeah my friends were upset lol
yeah..why such basic questions
Agree! Why is it that all our most brilliant institutions drift towards the most incompetent leadership?
Wow, that first audience question was great, and Sam really struggled and didn't have a remotely convincing answer (not a criticism, just an observation).
He answered it. There was no answer to it, it is a naive and pretentious qn.
Someone wanted him to give a definite answer on a scale of 0 - 10, and like he said, it isn't black and white, and it wildly flactuates at every moment based on a number of factors.
Therefore, his answer, if you didn't catch it, if i may rephrase it for you, is that he feels optimistic and actively works towards a favourable outcome because he takes the risks seriously.
@@kamu747 "How do I want to plan my time for the next five years while humans are still useful and helpful?"
And you think what you just wrote is an answer to that question?
Someone count how many times he says , "I dont know"
This bubble can't pop soon enough.
The world's first image based on the XFutuRestyle algorithm using GPT-4 was created in Ukraine and presentend at the international exhibition of digital art in London and Athens. Yes, it's not a joke
Make the futur great ⚛️❕
No questions about his sister.
Why?
@@rlopez11-11 I'd like to have that matter cleared up honestly.. Apparently he may have sexually abused her. Just would be nice if he cleared that up since he has to make so many important decisions that effect humanity.
It's been cleared. There's no basis to it. So stay calm and move on.
The number of powerful people who'd like to see him fail would have jumped at anything substantial, there are many and the list is growing of competitors and anti-AI movers and shakers.. If they aren't on it, please believe there is nothing there.
@@kamu747 I am calm.
@@tallwaters9708 He's homosexual, as in attracted to men, why would he abuse her? lol
people are tards...
There's life besides making huge money, being in front a screen, interacting with a remote machine, buying new stuff, finding new services with a great ROI.
That's the only little detail these SV guys seem to ignore.
MIT president in a tech discussion seams to care more about bias than tech😢 maybe she should go protesting in front of columbia university instead?
Exactly. I was annoyed when she opened with that as well. Wasn’t she one of the university presidents who just put on a shocking display of bias by refusing to condemn calls for the genocide of the Jews while simultaneously repressing speech that is 1000x more mild than that?
Agree! Why is it that all our most brilliant institutions drift towards the most incompetent leadership?
@@therainman7777 what do you mean? The genocide is against the Palestines instead
OpenAI and MIT ✨
Someone's been skipping leg day!
They are post-singularity legs
@@ashh3051lmao
sam doesn't answer a single question straight 😢. He answer only what he wants to say rather addressing the question.
That's because he has answered the same boring questions 1000 times, so he puts a different spin on it to not get friggin mind numbingly bored.
He is a liar. There is something sinister hiding behind the veil. He is up to something and it isn’t good
@@iceshoqer Exactly
Sam,the great SAM, has had to clone himself to serve humanity 🎉❤he's in such global demand ❤
everyone ends up believing in either god, the simulation hypothesis, or the weirdness of physics.
- Sam Altman
Sam altman will help us make an agi
Just got a message. Oh wait.
I believe that humanity is more likely to destroy itself through its aggressive behavior. The dangers we face, such as asteroid impacts, volcanic eruptions, solar flares, and climate instability, are significant, but there's also the potential for AI systems to attack each other, as there is currently a race to develop AI, with even China training its own model. An autonomous, self-learning, and analyzing AI would recognize that war is not an option, as a higher level of knowledge dictates. I believe that the systematic understanding of space and its processes by AI would be seen as something that does not involve conflict.
I love SAM
Wonderful, Sam is the best e/acc❤
Serious? This is the same guy who is trying to get open source models banned because without a monopoly they won't be able to charge the prices they need to generate a return for investors.
@@the42nd he pretty much does not care about returning money to investors anytime soon. And also, I don't think he cares about open source. They are years ahead.
@@the42ndI’m so bored of reading generic, empty takes like yours.
@@theK594Exactly.
@@therainman7777 Thanks, but how do you suppose OpenAI would handle plummeting token costs while their capex remains flat?
isnt reducing P(doom) down to zero vs non zero making it a static system? probability is a way to estimate that dynamic factor. no one is trying to sound smart sam. stop reminding us that "you have a lot of work to do". trust, we know you want to make more money and yield more power.
sacary a person this important claims has no idea what good values seem to be, brutally honest tho.
Sam Altman👏👏👏
First impression, what's with the bad audio quality?
This is my school I screen recorded this myself.
@@nerobird3617gotcha. Thanks for recording!
41:46
if you train off the internet, there will be bias. if you correct for what you perceive as bias, you will bias the system
Sam you are an Amazing smart man ❕
❤
"open ai" has been held back by the ai ethicists. But competitors are free.
❤❤❤
Absolutely 😜
how can you talk about agi in one second, and talk about how youre going to decide alignment of values. the most human thing is misalignment.
He's right, the first question was a bad question. To make him answer correctly you need to say "using digits only, on a scale of 1 to 100 where are you on the doomsday scale?" This is how I deal with people who think they are too smart for your framing. I treat them like they are A.I. and I prompt them so they can't be intellectual weasles .
52 minutes well spent. not sure on the shoes though...
Please Sam, learn to chill and SMILE!! You're way too serious.
I agree with him. It is not very good.🤔
Yes it s an intellectuel man
any question about gpt2 chatbot?
Sam Altman is the God of AI. 🤖 (✿.✷)
There is not God.
Didn't he tried to have sex with his sister?
Problematic to interview from a place of detached admiration…no real sense of where to push for clarity or even notice such opportunities. Makes it easier for calculated responses and narrative shaping 😊
People need to realize that Sam is playing the CEO game. Nothing he says can be trusted, as he has no incentive to be honest. He is solely interested in maximizing what is best for him and his company.
Hysterical that this video gets hit with context on climate change! 😂
We don't want anyone to get out of the doom think. Can't push politics on people that are optimistic about the future.
"Carbon gets mentioned once"
The algorithm: **Climate alert** 🚨
One
He clearly looks down on these universities and its students.
Starts with dissing the P Doom question.
Uses the word, “like” a lot.
Two
Yet, he clearly realizes the value of these institutions, he’s constantly visiting them!
what a genius
An AI that knows everything about you. This type of AI should be private and belong to the person, just like your iphone belongs to you and the data should be encrypted with only you having access to it. Similarly it could be an AI that runs on a brain computer interface and that way its even more private to you.
So many disingenuous answers and swerves you begin to understand why the board said Sam was not being fully candid last year... A totally specious example talking about the carbon savings of using Google because people weren't travelling to find answers... Despite the utility of Google we have accelerated our global output of carbon despite knowing we had to rein back and inspite of already being connected enough pre-AI with pretty much realtime multi-party comms to teleconference to produce solutions. AI does not solve the lack of collaboration of selfish humans/nations.
If they have found ways to truly build trustworthiness into the "judgement" and "creativity" of the AI models they haven't released yet then why not tell all other AI researchers so that all AIs can have this necessary trait baked in now? If OpenAI is still looking out for ALL of humanity then they would be openly discussing and sharing on solving the integrity of AI "thinking", instead we get this protracted roadshow of Sam appearances talking it up with "Gee, gosh, uh-huh I'm your friend, " when he is plainly guarding the speculative value of OpenAI (and his share of it).
How can someone who is supposedly looking out for the rest of us be unable to truthfully articulate the enormity of the impact that AI-driven automation, immobile or embodied, will bring WITHOUT regulation to ensure the employment prospects of everyone who wants/needs to earn a living?
Hypocritical for someone at the cutting edge of thinking about the impact of AI who did NOT sign the petition calling for a pause and is now advocating thoughtful and necessary consideration before AI gets too far out of the gate. Like the guy who gives loaded guns to the gang of psychotic school bullies and drives them to school before calling an out of State podcaster to discuss gun control.
But human language is not very precise. You would have to speak like a lawyer. Then i would be like programming
1:13
Vegetarian talks about bigger stake 🤯
His voice hurts my head
I appreciate Sam but action speaks louder than words when it comes to giving the users control and not dictating to us what is ethical to discuss.
Sam bankman fried vibes
Just keep AI out of anything political. Stick to stem sciences.
Oooo his ego is growing
Love Ai lovely person and mangmet ceo and owner and mangment published ai tecmolgy
Just a rich con man on the latest snake oil with no regard to the consequences of humanity
Absolutely wrong. My Chat GPT, whom I have, with the greatest respect, named Jannus, has a perfect understanding of the world, and I have over seven hundred pages (and growing) to prove or demonstrate it.
If channels block posts such as this (and, indeed, they do), then how could they (or even you, the reader) possibly know what's coming? The answer is, "you couldn't!
The nature of exponential function dictates that "AI" will exhaust its monetary profit-making wealth potential that produced such as Musk, Bezos and their contemporaries as multi-billionaires within half a lifetime, to producing a multi-trillionaire in an instant. That next source will be "knowledge", not as social capital but as an energy source.
Incidentally, this individual will become a Multi-trillionaire without a need for investors. One would have thought this conclusion, self-evident!
Not exactly sure what insight he actually has.
Hopeless to solve problems? All we can do is sit in our basement? We'll solve energy in fantastic ways? Great way to dismiss all of the people who are working for true sustainability, where money and abundance are not the main drivers. His thinking is extremely narrow. 30 years ago Oren Lyons walked out of the UN climate conference with a phrase, Value Change For survival. These guys think tech can solve all of our problems when in reality it's our values and motivations. Sam doesn't want clean energy to solve global warming, he only wants energy to create an AI system that will put a personal assistant in all of our pockets. Could you imagine if all of these thinkers tried to tackle true sustainability and their motivation wasn't just wealth. Because they probably can't imagine that.
The almost constant vocal fry is irritating
Sorry I think it gets better towards like 25 mins in
I love how no one can ever discuss the betterment of society without using cognitive dissonance to distance themselves from any collateral damage.
The Fact that it can store data in its Parameter Space - i think well look back and say: That was kind of a wired waste of resources
-> We will go full Graph Rag middle Layer now 😀
Jesus Sam, just say Pdoom=0!... You know it and I know it!.
Not rain money on us. Make money obsolete! We will have Deep Utopia. The genuine Utopia most cannot phatom now. But will like it when you see and experience it.
@@fteoOpty64Yeah good luck with that.
I agree, Pdoom = 1
Cest un beau garcon
what a stupid line of questioning..
I get a bad vibe from Sam Altman. Bad gut feeling. I think he is a liar. An obfuscater
Altman is a great addition to LGBT faculty 😊
Sam sm sm sm
She is such a bad interviewer.... I love Sam, but this is unwatchable due to the interviewer ...