FLYWOO FlyLens75 DJI O3 Micro Cinewhoop Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 93

  • @AlbertKimTV
    @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +13

    🛒 FLYWOO FlyLens75 - bit.ly/FlyLens75
    Naked O3 Camera Module - rb.gy/lv3kih
    60mm O3 coax cable - rb.gy/7c023v
    O3 connect cable - rb.gy/mo49vf
    Naked O3 Protector - rb.gy/23d7jy
    Foam Landing Pad - rb.gy/n3hku9
    550mah Lipo - t.ly/A_x4D
    750mah 2S Lipo - t.ly/AYKEV
    1000mah 2S Lipo - t.ly/tcbEZ
    FlyLens85 Review - ruclips.net/video/lKilKZsqcII/видео.html
    Jungle Gym Flight - ruclips.net/video/x3hLnugOInU/видео.html
    Narrated Flight - ruclips.net/video/KsFNvEWoDRk/видео.html

  • @Johnny19853
    @Johnny19853 11 месяцев назад +9

    Flywoo has been killing it lately. Great products from a great company.

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +1

      Yeah, they are one of the best.

  • @vanlifefpv6340
    @vanlifefpv6340 11 месяцев назад +11

    Glad they got rid of the leds in the prop guards. Just needless weight. Looks like this one is a good competitor to the Pavo Pico.

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад

      There's so many of these now...

  • @925fpv
    @925fpv 11 месяцев назад +11

    Basically the same as the 85 but a little smaller. Wish they would have sent you the O3 lite version instead.

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +4

      I may still strip down the O3 on this one anyway.

  • @frankcastillo8869
    @frankcastillo8869 11 месяцев назад +6

    Flies great. The demo flights you posted showed a lot of potential. Thanks for another great review.

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +1

      Thanks for watching!

  • @arthurgiourdjian9071
    @arthurgiourdjian9071 11 месяцев назад +6

    Flywoo has really been killing it latelty! Looks like a solid choice with either one

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +1

      They make some nice models for sure.

  • @SofiaisSunshine
    @SofiaisSunshine 11 месяцев назад +4

    I am a fan of flywoo. Probably be what I go for once I step up from my beginner kit

  • @grisvianbrudlie6093
    @grisvianbrudlie6093 11 месяцев назад +2

    I've always wanted a o3 tinywhoop for travels and just fpv in general. Having a tinywhoop with o3 combines portability with 4k video recording, combined with the goggles 2 makes the best fpv travelling setup. Great review

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +1

      This would be one I definitely would take on vacation.

  • @joshuaang5338
    @joshuaang5338 10 месяцев назад

    Great vid! Which one do you prefer?
    Pavo20 or Flylens85 non naked version? And why. Thanks!

  • @ElementalGeneral
    @ElementalGeneral 10 месяцев назад +2

    Man I'd be so nervous flying this with an O3

  • @imagin311
    @imagin311 10 месяцев назад

    I have the flylens85 with the runcam wasp and love that little drone. Flies really great. I only had an issue when trying these 3 bladed props and it would just shoot up and I had to disarm or it would fly away. I got some more of the same props it came with and all good. Couldn't figure out why it would do that with the tri-blades. I'm guessing it was a vibration/gyro issue. Looks like it flies well. Bardwell says he would not recommend the 75 with an O3 but looks like flies well. Great video as always!

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  10 месяцев назад +2

      They tuned it for 2-bladed props so use what they came with or you can re-tune it for 3-bladed props.

    • @nightowl_fpv
      @nightowl_fpv 10 месяцев назад

      I was about to do the same as you and put 3 bladed props, but as @AlbertKimTV is saying it will require a short retune. Probably you could just reduce the master slide bit and see. Don't forget to copy the tune preset to another pid preset, or backup the CLI.

  • @richardprideaux3128
    @richardprideaux3128 11 месяцев назад +2

    Hey mate, great review as always. Looks like flywoo have stepped it up, cheers for all your effort.

  • @WhitCoburn
    @WhitCoburn 9 месяцев назад

    Good review. Would this drone work with my dji controller 2? Thanks!

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  9 месяцев назад +1

      Yes, but you'll need to order the version for the RC2 otherwise the SBUS cables won't be connected and you'll have to mod it.

  • @Terry_Fritz
    @Terry_Fritz 11 месяцев назад +2

    Merry Christmas Albert and Happy Flights for 2024. Cheers mate. 🎅

  • @MCsCreations
    @MCsCreations 11 месяцев назад +1

    Awesome flying and review, Albert! 😃
    Pretty interesting little quad!
    Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
    And happy holidays!

  • @shadowofchaos8932
    @shadowofchaos8932 11 месяцев назад +2

    I wonder how many different USB connectors you have for different drones?

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +1

      huh?

    • @shadowofchaos8932
      @shadowofchaos8932 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@AlbertKimTV different angled USB ports for different air units and flight controllers.

  • @medrone7097
    @medrone7097 11 месяцев назад +2

    That would be great if manufacturers included different PIDs for different batteries. If they advertised that it could help sales.

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +1

      I'm sure they will advertise it if they do it.

  • @BrandonBeans
    @BrandonBeans 11 месяцев назад

    When is the 2.5" version coming out??

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +1

      Hmmm, probably in a month? 🤣

  • @jaechoe
    @jaechoe 11 месяцев назад +3

    looks awesome, looks like it flies great. seems like a winner for a 75 or the 85 size. Great review of the Flylens75!!!!

  • @DanielPeckham
    @DanielPeckham 11 месяцев назад +2

    Great review as always. I love my Flylens 85. I also love all the accessories Flywoo has been putting out for the O3 system

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +1

      Thanks for watching!

  • @xavierprimeto1752
    @xavierprimeto1752 11 месяцев назад +4

    Take my money!

  • @pojiajaib
    @pojiajaib 11 месяцев назад +1

    Thanks for ur information 👍🏼

  • @pandrews01
    @pandrews01 11 месяцев назад +1

    Great video!! I enjoyed the detailed description. Your micro quad reviews are very informative.

  • @Illbemeubeu84
    @Illbemeubeu84 11 месяцев назад +3

    Great information on the flight times and about antenna placement, thanks. Its very helpful to us noobs

  • @kaygeebee1962
    @kaygeebee1962 11 месяцев назад

    Ordered the 03 lite and a couple of 1000 mah’s. Hopefully it’s more reliable than the LR4 which popped motors with alarming regularity. Nice detailed review as always Albie, happy new year!

  • @pianomans1
    @pianomans1 11 месяцев назад +2

    Here we go! Excited!

  • @Gray_Beard
    @Gray_Beard 11 месяцев назад +1

    I’ve been looking at this one since I don’t have a whoop. Looks pretty good.

  • @jonatslab2284
    @jonatslab2284 11 месяцев назад

    Were you able to test it with the 1000mah? How was it?

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +4

      Yes, I talked about it in the video. Basically, it's a lot heavier so not very agile but still pretty fast and the flight time goes up to about 5:15 for me.

  • @robinno78
    @robinno78 11 месяцев назад

    Nice little cinewhoop with radio options like crsf, elrs, or dji

  • @SkeezyFPV
    @SkeezyFPV 11 месяцев назад +1

    Nice! And it even comes in crossfire 🔥🔥🔥

    • @925fpv
      @925fpv 11 месяцев назад +1

      looks like it does

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +1

      🔥🔥🔥

  • @Raftanova
    @Raftanova 11 месяцев назад

    Nice review ! I got the Lite version and it flies amazingly. Small, light and very discreet, so many possibilities; I even flew in the mountains with 😍

  • @aythixfpv
    @aythixfpv 11 месяцев назад

    This has a nice frame to it. My only concern is the 03 being on the bottom. It probably flies better that way. Flywoo makes a lot of good stuff. Nice review.

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +3

      Having crashed this and the 85 many times, I don't think having the O3 air unit on the bottom is an issue. Most of the time I've crashed, I've damaged the battery and it's landed upside down. However, having the weight of the air unit on the bottom feels better for me as I'm flying it. I feel like it tracks better and I have more control in hard turns.

    • @aythixfpv
      @aythixfpv 11 месяцев назад

      @@AlbertKimTV makes sense on the trucking part with lower cg

  • @sakulixx
    @sakulixx 10 месяцев назад

    which one of these is more quiet?

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  10 месяцев назад +3

      The 85 makes slightly less noise.

    • @sakulixx
      @sakulixx 10 месяцев назад

      @@AlbertKimTV Okay but do you think the 85 is good for indoor flying too?

  • @Towmanbo
    @Towmanbo 9 месяцев назад

    Is the battery xt30 connection?

  • @jlarson42
    @jlarson42 11 месяцев назад

    Great review Premier, nice chatting with everyone. 🤓

  • @pianomans1
    @pianomans1 11 месяцев назад

    Is there a way to change the pid tune profile with a switch on controller??

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +2

      If you program it into the radio on an AUX channel. I'm not exactly sure how to do it but I'm pretty sure it's possible.

  • @skardy8_fpv
    @skardy8_fpv 11 месяцев назад

    Which would best for inside real-estate gigs, I was just using my old ass analog cinebird,

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад

      How do you define "best"? Will this go through small gaps and fly nicely through small spaces? Sure. Is that your definition of best?

  • @pookguy88
    @pookguy88 11 месяцев назад

    how does it compare to the NBD Acrobee 75 O3?

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +1

      I talked about the differences in the video towards the end. I don't feel like typing it all out here again.

    • @pookguy88
      @pookguy88 11 месяцев назад

      @@AlbertKimTV I saw you talked about hardware differences but what about flight characteristics? mainly, which one flies better in your opinion?

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +1

      @@pookguy88 The pusher setup with the O3 on the bottom and battery sideways on top has superior flight characteristics IMO. It tracks better, feels a lot more locked in and predictable. It also is a little more efficient because there isn't anything below the props blocking the air flow. The sideways battery makes the pitch axis more controllable which in turn means you have more authority over speed changes. In all, this means for slow cinewhoop flights, this one is the better model.

  • @yusjahat
    @yusjahat 11 месяцев назад +2

    Now all brands of quad are making a small and lr..i wonder what quad will come in the future..maybe invisible quad or a giant quad..😂😂

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +2

      Those are boring categories.... 😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @jan-dron
    @jan-dron 11 месяцев назад +1

    😍

  • @pianomans1
    @pianomans1 11 месяцев назад

    The one thing that worries me about these flylens drones is the design that sticks the expensive O3 camera out in the open with about any camera protection. I just wonder how much abuse the camera will take. I have them in many other quads but they are protected pretty well so I haven't had any issues. Does anyone have an opinion on this .... I've seen how many people love how these drones perform, so for me it's a tough call. I just saw the small camera protector in the review that can be purchased separately. I think they should design something that is built into the drone..

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад +1

      The TPU camera protector is included with the 75 but I decided I didn't need it since I use the UV protector.

    • @frankcastillo8869
      @frankcastillo8869 11 месяцев назад +1

      I guess the cinewhoops with frame showing in the recorded video must be really popular?

  • @InternetBaikBuruk
    @InternetBaikBuruk 11 месяцев назад

    I am watching ❤

  • @ethanw6378
    @ethanw6378 11 месяцев назад

    that thing is HEAVY but it seems high quality as per usual for flywoo

    • @frankcastillo8869
      @frankcastillo8869 11 месяцев назад +1

      It doesn't hurt to be heavier. Will be better in the wind.

    • @ethanw6378
      @ethanw6378 11 месяцев назад

      @@frankcastillo8869 yes but a heavy quad is also not the most efficient or powerful quad

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  11 месяцев назад

      If you want more power, you should consider the larger prop sized whoops over this one. AFAIK, there isn't any in this size that will satisfy you.