What I consider to be the aircraft's greatest asset is never mentioned in the videos, which is the aircraft's versatility as it is built modularly. The same aircraft can function as a troop transport, parachutist launch platform, aeromedical removal, firefighting platform, transport of sensitive loads such as liquid oxygen, transport of standard loads, transport of armored vehicles... All you need to do is change the kits. internal changes in an operation that takes just a few hours, eliminating the need to have aircraft dedicated to each type of service.
The aircraft greatest asset is rarely mentioned in video or in print: it has double certification, military and civilian. The K/C-130 uses all milspec parts only made by Lockheed. This plane, on the other hand, can receive support from any Embraer certified supplier. That's game changing for logistics and availability. The modular approach is important, but it's not that important. The planes receive the kits and keep them almost permanently. They will only be moved to a different aircraft when it needs to be taken out of service to receive longer maintenance. If the kits are permanent, air forces would need multiple aircraft able to fulfill any role, to take over when some of the fleet is in maintenance downtime. The modular approach doesn't help with day-to-day logistics or operations, just with fleet optimization.
@@rafaelschipiura9865 On the contrary, modularity has been one of the main factors of choice. And during the Pandemic this modularity was exploited to the maximum, with the same aircraft transporting liquid oxygen, regular cargo and passengers, all on the same day.
We could fit the LAV 3 comfortably as well, but likely would not stray away from US or European markets. No clear answer on when our fleet of C-130's will be retired, so who knows...
I don't mind the European market. But I do Not Trust the US in any Military contracts any more. We should look at other NATO Members for purchase. Maybe get a purchase and build deal that Brazil got from Saab
Only if your air force wants it, because this plane can be sold to any country easily, several NATO countries are purchasing it, because it is NATO standard, the truth is that your country would pay less, for a plane that will deliver much more, and consume less money.
This aircraft only has 1 defect. Not be American or at least produced on American soil by some large defense company. Embraer urgently needs to achieve a partnership or even form a joint venture, or even a new company with one of the major players in the American defense sector. If they achieve this, the C-390 has a great and real chance of becoming the official aircraft to replace the C-130s of earlier versions in America.
No bro 😅. We are capable of producing the plane by ourselves. We, for sure, don't need any American soul to claim their flag over a Brazilian airplane.
Embraer already has a deal with Sierra Nevada to build it's planes in the US, when there are orders from the USAF. They already do build military airplanes in Florida, the A-29 Super Tucano. And the plane already meets requirements for minimum US content. Embraer does know how to sell to the US market.
@@rafaelschipiura9865 selling the A-29, which does not have a functional American counterpart, is not the same thing as selling an aircraft that the counterpart is one of the flagships of the main American company in the defense sector. Sierra Nevada does not have the lobbying power to go head to head with Lockheed.
@@simeao1979 Both Brazil and the United States are competitors in the military industrial field, although this issue exists, Brazil was one of the few countries in the world to achieve a military market in the United States. Only 3 countries have achieved this feat, with Brazil being the fourth, the 4th United Kingdom with the Sea-Herryer, Sweden with the Cargustav, Italy with the Costellation destroyers 8x8 Super AV Brazil with the A-29 Super Tucano It is not easy to enter the complex US military market for several reasons. The US military complex requires components and projects to be designed and built in the United States with US technology provided by major defense industries such as McDonnell. Lockheed Northrop etc... Which makes things very difficult in the specific case of Brazil for a simple reason: Brazil builds advanced weapons and technologies using leftover components from other manufacturers or components Not patented in the military area with some exceptions, Brazil manages to develop some patented weapons with military components And why this part is crucial in the US industrial complex Because when it comes to military patented components you can embargo or sanction your enemy whenever you want, with civilian patented components this is very difficult. A clear example are the countries Venezuela, Iran, Argentina and others, although Argentina does not have a veto from the United States but from the United Kingdom, Argentina has difficulties in acquiring weapons with Components of English in the military area such as Ejector Accents
Brazillian here. This C-390 have two new options to military: Radar and Heavy weapons. Both in study, but not officialy confirmed. Another thing is Embraer says: If a Company want a Civil Cargo C-390 wee can start a producion if they pay to create the new model.
I admit it can fly higher, faster and further than a C130j, but it doesn't have the same cargo capacity, number of troops or have the short field performance, loaded, as the C130. It's also built with a fair amount of new age materials that aren't as reliable as people think, it has a much higher hourly maintenance cost. The real penalties are cost at 150 to 160 million dollars, mnus the electronics, versus the 67 to 114 million dollars for the C130 and the c130s lower operating costs most air forces can't afford it. It was why new Zealand went c130 and so did a lot of other countries.
What I consider to be the aircraft's greatest asset is never mentioned in the videos, which is the aircraft's versatility as it is built modularly.
The same aircraft can function as a troop transport, parachutist launch platform, aeromedical removal, firefighting platform, transport of sensitive loads such as liquid oxygen, transport of standard loads, transport of armored vehicles... All you need to do is change the kits. internal changes in an operation that takes just a few hours, eliminating the need to have aircraft dedicated to each type of service.
The aircraft greatest asset is rarely mentioned in video or in print: it has double certification, military and civilian. The K/C-130 uses all milspec parts only made by Lockheed. This plane, on the other hand, can receive support from any Embraer certified supplier.
That's game changing for logistics and availability.
The modular approach is important, but it's not that important. The planes receive the kits and keep them almost permanently. They will only be moved to a different aircraft when it needs to be taken out of service to receive longer maintenance. If the kits are permanent, air forces would need multiple aircraft able to fulfill any role, to take over when some of the fleet is in maintenance downtime. The modular approach doesn't help with day-to-day logistics or operations, just with fleet optimization.
@@rafaelschipiura9865 On the contrary, modularity has been one of the main factors of choice.
And during the Pandemic this modularity was exploited to the maximum, with the same aircraft transporting liquid oxygen, regular cargo and passengers, all on the same day.
Áustria, The Netherlands, Sweden, Czech Republic and South Korea are also clients.
It has an insane design, like something that comes from a sci-fi movie, it makes the others aircrafts of the same category look ugly and old
C390Millenium is the best in the class
Wish Canada would look at this aircraft.
We could fit the LAV 3 comfortably as well, but likely would not stray away from US or European markets. No clear answer on when our fleet of C-130's will be retired, so who knows...
I don't mind the European market. But I do Not Trust the US in any Military contracts any more. We should look at other NATO Members for purchase. Maybe get a purchase and build deal that Brazil got from Saab
Only if your air force wants it, because this plane can be sold to any country easily, several NATO countries are purchasing it, because it is NATO standard, the truth is that your country would pay less, for a plane that will deliver much more, and consume less money.
O melhor Avião do mundo na sua categoria.
Amazing aircraft.
Hope Indian Airforce finalises C390 deal for it's MTA tender.
I hope so, A400 is too expensive.
@@naubersm even if India buys the C-390 it will still need to buy the A400, they are different category planes.
@@naubersm a good thing is probably India will receive a full factory, in partnership with Mahindra to produce the C-390 locally.
EMBRAER ORGULHO DIS BRASILEIROS
theyre doing it
This aircraft only has 1 defect. Not be American or at least produced on American soil by some large defense company.
Embraer urgently needs to achieve a partnership or even form a joint venture, or even a new company with one of the major players in the American defense sector.
If they achieve this, the C-390 has a great and real chance of becoming the official aircraft to replace the C-130s of earlier versions in America.
No bro 😅. We are capable of producing the plane by ourselves. We, for sure, don't need any American soul to claim their flag over a Brazilian airplane.
Embraer already has a deal with Sierra Nevada to build it's planes in the US, when there are orders from the USAF. They already do build military airplanes in Florida, the A-29 Super Tucano. And the plane already meets requirements for minimum US content. Embraer does know how to sell to the US market.
@@rafaelschipiura9865 selling the A-29, which does not have a functional American counterpart, is not the same thing as selling an aircraft that the counterpart is one of the flagships of the main American company in the defense sector.
Sierra Nevada does not have the lobbying power to go head to head with Lockheed.
@@simeao1979
Both Brazil and the United States are competitors in the military industrial field, although this issue exists, Brazil was one of the few countries in the world to achieve a military market in the United States.
Only 3 countries have achieved this feat, with Brazil being the fourth, the 4th United Kingdom with the Sea-Herryer, Sweden with the Cargustav, Italy with the Costellation destroyers 8x8 Super AV Brazil with the A-29 Super Tucano It is not easy to enter the complex US military market for several reasons.
The US military complex requires components and projects to be designed and built in the United States with US technology provided by major defense industries such as McDonnell. Lockheed Northrop etc...
Which makes things very difficult in the specific case of Brazil for a simple reason: Brazil builds advanced weapons and technologies using leftover components from other manufacturers or components Not patented in the military area with some exceptions, Brazil manages to develop some patented weapons with military components And why this part is crucial in the US industrial complex Because when it comes to military patented components you can embargo or sanction your enemy whenever you want, with civilian patented components this is very difficult.
A clear example are the countries Venezuela, Iran, Argentina and others, although Argentina does not have a veto from the United States but from the United Kingdom, Argentina has difficulties in acquiring weapons with Components of English in the military area such as Ejector Accents
Brazillian here.
This C-390 have two new options to military: Radar and Heavy weapons. Both in study, but not officialy confirmed.
Another thing is Embraer says:
If a Company want a Civil Cargo C-390 wee can start a producion if they pay to create the new model.
Se diz "civilian", não "civil". Civilian cargo plane.
"Another thing is Embraer says" é uma frase sem sentido. Corrija.
Pare de ser carente pelo amor.
Spam
I admit it can fly higher, faster and further than a C130j, but it doesn't have the same cargo capacity, number of troops or have the short field performance, loaded, as the C130. It's also built with a fair amount of new age materials that aren't as reliable as people think, it has a much higher hourly maintenance cost. The real penalties are cost at 150 to 160 million dollars, mnus the electronics, versus the 67 to 114 million dollars for the C130 and the c130s lower operating costs most air forces can't afford it. It was why new Zealand went c130 and so did a lot of other countries.
lobby
Hércules 21000kg e mileniun 26000kg
5:06 oh dear, Kawasaki C3...
Makes you wonder........
Good eye.
I missed that.
**C-2**
But good spot.
I am sorry but if Brazil wants to be apart of BRICS then all NATO counties should not be able to purchase or if they do then they lose NATO status.
We just want to play ball... not get married... chill XD
@@vitaobatera chill, jonathanmnathan, is prob a american, doing the usual protectionism thing..
I am sorry but the U.S. wants to leave Nato for good, as well as hand Ukraine over to Putler.
Omg I didn't know americans' egos were so fragile kkkk
@@joaovitorlira5368 they still think boeing doesnt build crappy planes apparently