StarScope Monocular 80x100 Review and Test | Is it any Good ?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 июл 2023
  • Hello,
    The world is a beautiful place to explore ! Sometimes we need a instrument to explore the world in its full beautiness. Is the StarScope Monocular a good instrument tough ? Today i will find that out from a astronomical point of view by testing and comparing it with my phone's digital zoom and trusted telescope. Stay till the end to see a attempt of the orion nebula with this monocular.
    #astronomy #science #review #test #unboxing
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 19

  • @dogwalker666
    @dogwalker666 10 месяцев назад +5

    When I saw the advertising I guessed they were lying about the zoom.

    • @photonik-luminescence
      @photonik-luminescence  10 месяцев назад +3

      Not even on the product itself they mention the actual zoom (the zoom on monocular and binoculars should be before the X mentioned as on some equipment i found. The number after the X is probably the diameter or focal length, bu i am not sure. For telescopes it's different, but this monocular is just misleading in general).
      Thanks alot for watching 👍.

  • @wolfmanjackxl1691
    @wolfmanjackxl1691 10 месяцев назад +4

    Mhmm, to my knowledge the first number normally indicates the magnification, the second number the diameter of the objective lenses.

    • @photonik-luminescence
      @photonik-luminescence  10 месяцев назад +3

      Exactly ! But that is not true for this monocular. After my testing and knowledge with telescopes, it only has a zoom of 10x, no more. 80x zoom is so powerful that you can se venus very well in its crescent phase just like the our moon. So, that's no 80x zoom

  • @cynz1433
    @cynz1433 6 месяцев назад +4

    The music is louder than ur voice

    • @photonik-luminescence
      @photonik-luminescence  6 месяцев назад +3

      Sometimes it is. I try to balance the levels out. In newer videos this Problem is more minimised and my voice boosted. Sorry if the music overpowered my voice a bit. That's why i use text (so you can read the information)

    • @gweedomurray9923
      @gweedomurray9923 5 месяцев назад

      @@photonik-luminescence ~ The tunes are a distraction. Only 44 seconds in and will be going to another vid. Sorry.

    • @photonik-luminescence
      @photonik-luminescence  5 месяцев назад +2

      @@gweedomurray9923 i do understand that the music is too loud in this case. I changed this actually in new videos. But you will require a silent place or headphones and you will be able to understand.

  • @nomars4827
    @nomars4827 12 дней назад +1

    What is the weight? How is it suitable for night view?

    • @photonik-luminescence
      @photonik-luminescence  12 дней назад +2

      I have scale over 100 grams so unfortunately i can't say pricecly the weight but it is overloading my 100 grams scale. It is however very light and portable no questions asked. As far as visibility at night, there is no advantage of using it. It does NOT amplify light and you only see what you see trough any regular binoculars. Thanks alot for watching and commenting !

    • @nomars4827
      @nomars4827 12 дней назад +1

      @@photonik-luminescence oh I think it should be around 300grams. But can not find this anywhere.
      It certainly should have an advantage at night in comparison with compact optics with small lenses like 10x25. As it should collect 2.8 times more light. Of course there is much more potent low light optics with exit pupil of 7-8mm. While this has about 4.2mm.
      I can't find something budget compact lightweight with large exit pupil. Something like 4x28 would be ideal . But I found only ACOG scopes and they are very expensive for me.

    • @photonik-luminescence
      @photonik-luminescence  12 дней назад +1

      @@nomars4827 I see. Yes, this is indeed similar to how telescopes collect light. It's just that i personally don't really see any better with it. It doesn't darken the image, wich would have been bad. It is a pretty nifty monocular. The zoom simply is the the only decieving part. It only has X10 zoom. The monocular does what it does really well. Also ,may i know your implication scenario of this monocular ?

  • @pissnotime1894
    @pissnotime1894 7 месяцев назад +4

    the lens isn't 100mm right ? it's a scam

    • @photonik-luminescence
      @photonik-luminescence  7 месяцев назад +3

      Exactly, it is a scam. I have a actual 300mm telescope, and this isn't eaven 1/3rd of it. Also, it's misdlabeled. I know that on monoculars or binoculars, first number indicates the zoom (which here us decieving). I mean, it still works tough and is pretty ok for its price. Just don't expect anything spectacular from it

  • @stechanina3631
    @stechanina3631 3 месяца назад +2

    The lens is between 50 and 60 mm not 100 ,il’s a lie for sure

    • @photonik-luminescence
      @photonik-luminescence  3 месяца назад +1

      Absolutely. It does offer a x10 optical zoom but that's really it. It simply decievs unfamiliarised people that don't know much about zooming and buy it because the ads claim they have "x80" zoom. It's good for simple things as bird watching or a bit of landscape viewing or whatever other applications

    • @nomars4827
      @nomars4827 12 дней назад

      42 mm and it costs ~6 bucks on good day in ali

  • @gamez1
    @gamez1 9 месяцев назад +3

    you should also wonder about the 100 of the "80x100" information. easy to see it is an other lie

    • @photonik-luminescence
      @photonik-luminescence  9 месяцев назад +2

      Yes i did. Especially since the first number should represent the zoom and second the diameter. (Which both are fake) i would assume they actually wanted it to sound more interesting. But it is entirely decieving. I think the entire no brand binocular and phobe telephoto lens are a lie. This one seems to be a pretty common one tough. Deep in the description they do memtion that it only has x10 zoom. But i found this fact to not always be mentioned.