Why Overturning Chevron Was A Fantastic Supreme Court Ruling: Steve Forbes
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 июл 2024
- Steve Forbes explains why the Supreme Court striking down Chevron Deference was a fantastic move.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
As long as politicians get their kickbacks and lobbyists cash they'll let anyone call the shots.
🎯
Perfect example why we need only public funding for campaigns. Take the political control away from the donors and back into the hands of the people.
Nonsense
Which means striking down citizens United. Yep. Good luck with a money grubbing supreme Court.
Sure, let's increase the national debt by another few $ trillion.
@@Frodojack Why do you think they'd be able to just use tax money the same way they use billionaires'?
YES!!!
It's not the blind leading the blind it's the corrupt leading the blind 😮
Are yu familiar with the term "Judas Goat?"
Congress needs to do the job and not give it to big corporations to do the job for them.
Congress' job is to keep government lean and small. They aren't too good at that...
You didn't listen to the video. Mr. Forbes didn't say anything of the sort. It's the bureaucrats who have their own agenda & instead of going to a vote in Congress will curry favor by Gov't. agencies to enact their 'wish list'. The biggest abuser of their Office is the EPA & the CDC. Like Mr. Forbes said, it costs the American People & Businesses $T's a year. Has nothing to do w/ corporations getting their 'way'. That's whiner talk.
The People of this country are the problem. They continually vote for politicians who promise to use government in a manner other than that which the Founding Fathers designed it to do. The ENTIRE 4th branch of government, the administrative state, the alphabet soup, is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, and should not even exist. The THREE branches defined in the US Constitution can do everything that our federal government was designed to do. This unconstitutional 4th branch of government was designed to funnel all of your money into projects that benefit the rich and powerful, and I don't think anyone can reasonably say that they all still serve any other purpose than unconstitutional control of the economy and the People of this country.
Defend the Congress and DO not Allow the CORP. Big wigs to wright laws
The whole system is corrupt and that is why I don't support any political party
That whole thing that the EPA was going to ban gas cars all on their own without legislation was a bridge too far.
we have 80 years left of oil
@@JerryS-zb2lf who said?
@JerryS-zb2lf Even if that true, so what?
@@JerryS-zb2lf HUH ? bet you can not Show those numbers In Fact I know you can NOT oil is not fossils or old DINOSAURS I made a statement now prove me wrong
@@claycoates5056 I can show those numbers, we have 565 billion barrels left a US geological survey showed in 2012, we use 20 million or so A DAY, we're running out. You need to check the numbers simply google what I've said.
Time for congress to actually get off its butt and do the job they were hired to do.... legislate, not pass the buck to unelected agencies.
It would be great if everyone passing the laws were experts, but that is not how the constitution is written...but that should not stop congress from consulting with the experts and then passing the needed laws.
We need to be holding congresses feet to the fire to make sure they are doing their jobs.
Cool it with the antisemitism, broh! /s
Good luck getting Congress to corporate enough to actually legislate…
The power should be with the people. Term limits needed. And WEF needs out if power. Tyranny is rampant in government
@@debbieluna2967 term limits is a huge priority
All you people bitch about the EPA but when your water is undrinkable from one of our industries mainly big oil or chemical companies like this forever chemical who do you call??
@@williamk2257you think the EPA is protecting you from forever chemicals? I have bad news for you…
"How can you protest police corruption and actions because if your house got broken into, who would you call?" Are you serious?
Pond, creeks, and mud puddles? As someone who has to define what a federally navigable waterway is for my job. We have not and never will define a navigable waterway as such. Where did he even get that statement from?
That term, navigable waterway was in the regulations the federal government was pushing to justify regulating the ponds,creeks and mud puddles on your property,that was a bridge too far and it was ridiculous.
Because he does not know people who actually have expertise and do such jobs...
“Experts” such as “energy expert” Jennifer Granholm” wanting to ban all forms of existing energy sources and infrastructure, other than what affects her gazillion dollars on shares, and chairmanship other Proterra EV battery bus manufacturer?
No. They don't. Explain where you got your information.
expert just means an academic that politically and ideologically aligns with the ruling party.
Expert is someone that spent their life learning about a subject. Until they knew more than almost anyone else. A lifetime of study and experience. That is an expert. Not someone like you that's barely finished high school and works in a warehouse.
The Constitution is perhaps the wisest document ever written.
It used to be the court decided it was going to rewrite it
For rich people, of course 🙄
Us poor people are fed up. Your days are numbered, Forbes
So basically the EPA cannot simply ban gas appliances. Maybe now they have to also give up all their weapons as well.
Same for the IRS.
Exactly.
Hopefully. Irs,dea,fbi,atf shouldn't be killing Americans over unpaid taxes
Thanks Steve! Appreciate your insights.
So many people do not know the importance of Chevron thank you for trying to educate about this amazing ruling. Regular local news doesn’t cover important changes.
I live in Connecticut and I have a client who is a fisherman buddy year ago he told me about this and honestly I thought he was exaggerating I couldn’t imagine that the government with mandate fisherman to have to pay for a “” observer on their boat who in the hell thought that was a good idea
"Who in the Hell thought that was a good idea"The 'Administrative' state members and the Deap State(swamp)!!
Bad actors destroy entire fisheries. That is the problem, not regulating them out of that result.
@kimthibeau8354 You are going a little too fast. While one can agree that bureaucrats should not be ruling and the controlling agencies should not be creating work for themselves, a different problem is being created by letting loose corporate power.
Ask Boeing about the missing bolts or rivets and what the FAA did in the past about it even when a semblance of regulation was in place.
Now, the industry will be free to do as they please and nobody will regulate the trains that get off the rails or the airplane doors that fly out.
The flood gates have been opened, profit yes; public interest can wait.
It is ridiculous to assume that private corporations will self regulate without looking at the bottom line first.
@@pindapoy1596 how does this prevent regulation? It puts the power to interpret laws back in the hands of the judicial branch, where it was supposed to be as per the constitution. The idea that only the bureaucrats can protect us from the corporations is laughable, especially when these agencies are littered with former executives from the very corporations they're supposed to be regulating.
@@pindapoy1596 nice to see you literally didn't even watch the video.
so experts will have no saying in their fields and instead, politicians will determine wether something is good or bad. How this is a good thing?
nvm this means asbeston is back in our water LET'S GOOOOOOOOOO
It's NOT a good thing. Smh
What does this mean for code enforcement ?
Most people have no idea how big this is. Sad to say.....
My chy goze to a goot pulic skoo..
We are guaranteed in writing enshrined in our constitution that we will always be a Republic as stated by article 4 section 2 of the u.s. constitution during the constitutional convention in Philadelphia between May and September 1796 the delegates argued long and hard about what form of government the new nation should take. The article of confederation that had governed the United States after the Revolutionary war ended had created a very weak central government that had no power to manage trade print a single currency or pass or enforce laws that all the States would universally agree to. It was a nation on the verge of collapse that sounds familiar huh?. I could go on . You can read this yourself I read the whole dam thing all their arguments . Ask yourself how you did we get here!
Forbes thinks fascism and a dictator are better. That's why they bought the SCOTUS.
Clearly that means nothing
The would be nobility dislikes that fact
Do you even know what a republic is and the difference between a republic and democracy?
@@beastfromthemiddleeast6369 The word "democracy" is rooted in the Greek word literally meaning "mob rule."
You can keep your mob rule, Shaqueefa!
Wow, the best ruling the Supreme Court did. Thank you.
The best think is taking away your protection for safe food, for clean water and for unpolluted air is the best thing ever?
How much does Forbes pay you?
Found the rabbi.
This ruling on Chevron Deference didn't do that,it left in place all of the rules and regulations made under Chevron Deference before this new ruling,I remember when there was no Chevron Deference, the Clean Air Act was being enforced and the rivers, Iakes and streams were being cleaned up and any rules or regulations put into effect before this new ruling remains in effect,anything new will have to be written up in legislation by Congress in a clear,concise manner which is what Congress was supposed to be doing to start with,if Congress needs help they can have public hearings and call experts to testify and then decide which experts opinions they will go with when they write legislation.
Thank you Mr. Forbes for bringing us information we'll never get from MSM.
Ya, lies and propaganda are much better than facts and freedom.
Because how he’s spinning it is disingenuous and they try to avoid that
Everyone..have a wonderful day..blessings and much love to you all ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Bot
Will you pray for the mother that died out side a hospital because Roe was over turned, Doctors would not help her so they told her to leave the hospital and she died in the parking lot.
@@barbarasieg1801 prayers & Positive vibes
I’ve been screaming about this unconditionally power grab for years amen
Me too.
You're talking about a group of five proven liars that sold themselves to billionaires for an RV or a fishing trip, running everything that protects us is a good idea you've thought about for years? You really think anyone thinks you are anything but a shill for Forbes?
Can we get back the money spent on student loans? I paid for mine they should to. FJB.
Who needs scientific expert advice? Judges need vacations and gratuities.
@@RM-nd7gn can people start paying their fair share of taxes? I had to pay mine.
3 Seperate but Equal Branches
Since Chevron was overturned shouldn't the corporate veil also be overturned?
I can't get over hearing a bit of good news for a change.
Right?? !!!😮😊
@tarawarren7168 I had to watch it twice because I couldn't believe what I saw. "For real, not a joke."
Edgar Cayce alluded that "Russia" (not the soviet union) would free the world from a "corrupt" financial system.
There have been several of Edgar Cayce's allusions that didn't come true when he said they would, and still haven't come true,he was a false prophet.
Just like the ATF has been writing their own rules but no more!!!
FJB!
And, isn't that great?
ATF has been making their own laws & pretending they are lawmakers when they are tools to effect laws.
@@colettekatz1471only if you hate the constitution and don’t mind people you didn’t elect telling you want you can and can’t do.
Now Hunter Biden can be exonerated .
What they wrote needs to be rolled back.
What is better? Having experts make policy decisions in a given area, or elected officials ignorant of just about everything?
You mean " Experts " like Fauci ?!?
Elected officials.
I’m split on this. I know there’s rampant corruption in the alphabet agencies, however, I’m pro environment and can see where this ruling could be completely devastating, but I’m also anti Fauci and CDC/Big Pharma and can see where it could be GOOD.
@@user-zn6qh8ur8b This is exactly what has led to corporate capture of government agencies.
We elect the politicians. They can listen to the experts what to write laws. But we can at least vote them out when they do things we don't like.
If they write a law and the unelected bigshots can make it mean what they want it to mean.
They can mess us over much easier.
Less than 20 years ago the Dems would be cheering this decision, and the Bush republicans would be screaming.
The so called experts end up being the same people that sat on the big boards of the massive companies 5 minutes ago. And when they leave they go right back on.
So you're pro technocracy?
Fact: doing away with federal agencies would allow large corporations to require unlimited work hours, no safety regulations, no health insurance, pesticides in your water, lead in your air, no public schools, no safety standards, operate in banking without regs, poisonous food production, no consumer safety, and operate as they pleased. Every individual for themselves. Without agency regulations every federal court would be inundated with cases to overturn codes and regulations. Each federal court district and state supreme court would issue different decisions. That would basically stop economic growth in the U.S. as every corporation, state, county, federal entity tried to interpret rules and regulations. Guaranteed anarchy and free fall economy.
I bet they ignore the ruling and just keep on what they're doing. Who will stop them?
*Dogs everywhere can breathe a sigh of relief*
Chevron erased. Just in time as what’s next? Plutonium & Cesium declared GRAS?
Whoa whoa whoa what did cesium ever do to anyone lol it ain’t naturally radioactive
@@sirdiealot53 oops. Caesium-137
Those who can't do the work, try to regulate those who do the job.
Why exactly would a scientist trained to determine nutrition be working in a food factory on the line, for example?
Your ‘quip’ makes no sense
@@nenafan1 It's an old saying about regulators and workers. Workers do everything that needs to be done to produce a product. Regulators find ways to justify their jobs by finding fault somewhere, even if you do everything perfectly and by the rules
@@davidneidel436
I know it’s an old adage and it’s a moronic adage.
Rules change. Conditions change. No one ever does something ‘perfectly.’
Reality is a touch more complicated than quaint adages from days gone by.
What Mr. Steve Forbes is saying here, is that poor people do not need the Environmental Protection Agency or any other Consumer protection agency, because they are not profitable. And by the time the House of Representatives figures out how to re-regulate industry, we will have all been Quick-Fried to a Crackly crunch by Global Warming!
Thanks Steve, by the way, do you have any sun tan lotion we could borrow?
thanks for explaining this.
"Let's hope we have a new president that respects the courts' rule." Wtf. Lmao. Implying that DT would do so is CRAZY! At least JB is acting on behalf of the people.
Need to shut down the entire 4th branch of government and bring back the THREE branches as defined in the US Constitution. Executive branch, Judicial branch, and Legislative branch. These THREE branches SHOULD be able to do everything that our federal government was designed to do.
🎯
@@trentp151 Absolutely!
It’s almost like the Founding Fathers didn’t have much of a concept for actually running a modern country and were instead stuck in an agrarian mindset…
Why establish rules for educating the populace if there’s no real concept of public education to start??
@@nenafan1 You fundamentally misunderstand what it means to run the country, as per the US Constitution. You might read it one day, and you could enlighten yourself as to the very limited scope that the Founding Fathers intended, and rightfully so. Adding all this extra crap onto what government "needs to do" has created a $34 trillion dollar hole in our great-great-great grandchildren's pockets (if this country lasts this long, and it won't last much longer if we continue to allow the 4th branch of government to exist).
Plus, taxation is theft, but property taxation is slavery. Alphabet agencies NEED TO GO.
Individual liberty? Corporations who are basic monopolies are not individuals. Your conception of society is ridiculous.
Great video Steve. Totally agree!!!
We know that greed is part of the human condition and we as a species have struggled to be more than we are now.but for those who are suffering this condition to try to normalize their condition is like trying to get an alcoholic to stop drinking..the only difference is that most alcoholics eventually accept their addiction and try to save themselves and those around them ...there does not seem to be any such way to help or stop these people as they come to accept their behavior ...please no more bs
I noticed over 30 years ago people using administrative law to circumvent the United States Of America's Constitution / contract law through agreements made through State id's , etc...
Congress does not have the resources to be completely specific about the legislation it passes, so executive branch agencies must determine how to enforce the laws, and the courts determine whether the agencies are acting within the scope of the legislation.
😂😂😂 as if you think us lowly blue collar workers are dumb. EAT THE RICH. PAY YOUR DAMN TAXES.
That was a lot of information I like that, Professor Jed rubenfeld from Yale University explains it on his podcast straight down the middle.
And who said the Supreme Court can’t be brought
Ban digital surveillance
This was a great decision!!!!!!! This court is slowly returning us to the real meaning and spirit of the constitution.
It really was. I’m so glad that he explained it. I’ve been looking for a good explanation all week. Between all of them I’ve got a grasp on it
which is that all-powerful kings are awesome to have! We can only be truly free when there is a great iron fist running everything with greatness to own the libs!
The ‘real spirit and meaning’ that unelected and uneducated judges makes decisions about how much lead in water is acceptable?
It is amazing to watch people cheer this knowing how much damage is going to be done.
This decision has ended the illegal administrative state's ability to interpret and write law without congressional approval! It takes away the deep state's ability to circumvent and violate the Constitution and our rights through an illegal, unelected administrative branch of corrupt government. There are only three (3) branches of government. The administrative state is not one of them. Educate yourself! 🤬 ⚖️ 🇺🇲
?
Yeah, ?
We're finally allowed to fix the damage!!
Great explanation offering clarity in understanding this point of law which has been exploited by bureaucrats to the detriment of our citizenry. It is hoped that this ruling will return us to the time honored standard of laws made by our traditional lawmakers, the elected legislators in Congress who were designated to perform this function.
Thank you sir, bigger people. Who get things.
The EPA carry sniping rifles. That says it all.
Bathhouse Barry weaponized most every federal agency. As many as 15,000 invaders cross into our country on a daily basis.
Absolutely!! 💯
Steve is right
More shills for your friend ---Steve?
Steve has one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel. He doesn't give 2 sh#ts about the future.
At 1st I thought he was talking about the SCOTUS decision regarding Presidential immunity.
Thank you Steve. You are a blessing
No it wasn’t a fantastic decision for Americans but it was fantastic for the huge corporations that don’t want any regulations.
@@enochpage1333 wrong the bureaucracy shouldn’t write law. Congress needs to do their job and write law. The 3 letter agencies aren’t law makers or tax writers or anything but paper shufflers who get paid.
@douglaskaye1395 corporations aren't people, even if they lobbied enough to have it written into law. These rules and regulations aren't for you, me, or anyone else trying to actually work hard for a living in this country. They're for the rich that are benefiting from this overturn. The rich that want to be able to do whatever they want. Biden should expand and pack the Supreme Court now to at least stop the bleeding of laws that were enacted by the appropriate powers. The current Supreme Court is corrupt, with their eyes on the goal of taking away anything that helps or protects private individuals over corporations and the rich. Go figure they were put into power by someone who's considered to be a rich, shrewd, businessman.
Amazing how Forbes misrepresented and people don't get it. Agencies make regulations, not law. Not the same.
Praise God Praise God! Thankyou God..all glory to you for this overturn decision. Please help us correct the wrongs and abuses of these regulations of agencies. Thankyou for protecting the constitution. Help our leaders make appropriate decisions and laws!
Nero fiddling...🔥🔥
Congress should have the last say
Anything that limits government overreach is A-Ok with me!
You must not care what poison is in your drinking water or food or the air you must breath.
@@johnsmith-dz5en You should consider the fact that you food will not be inspected and your air and water will be polluted but go ahead and be ignorant.
So just A-ok with corporations clogging up the court system with challenges to specific rules and regulations instead, I assume.
Not to mention seemingly in favor of lead in the water and all that jazz, since ‘big guv bad.’
@@nenafan1You write as if there are no longer going to be any regulations at all. What there won’t be is the myriad of frivolous regulations designed only to garner excessive power and enrich the corporation. We had plenty of sensible regulation before Chevron. Sensible regulation will still rule. Don’t claim the sky is falling when it isn’t.
The EPA is a prime offender
@@johnglassmeyer4220 hell the FCC has been grabbing tax dollars by calling that $hit fees. Only congress can tax!!!
The original EPA mission was to stop the river in Cleveland from periodically catching fire and bring Lake Erie back to life. That goal was accomplished in about 8 years. At which point they had to start justifying their existence by finding other things to "fix". God help us.
all Agencies were created to implement UN Governance. These Agencies and even your Local Gov are implementing Sustainable Development in a Sovereign Nation - its Treason really. Once again thank democrats Woodrow Wilson and FDR .
I like having a think tank to solve problems,I just think laws are made by Congress and Courts interpret those laws when in conflict.Agencies can be cut in half and still deliver data to Congress to make laws concerning the needs of the public.If Congress wants rules they gotta do the work.We have 15 departments and 436 agencies…which could be cut in half or just done away with.Big Government is sucking the life out of the country and running up debt.
@@franksullivan1873 yes
Open the floodgates to deconstruct the Administrative State! All of the federal agencies need to be overhauled. ATF, EPA, DOI, DOE, FAA, DOD, USDA ,USFS, USFWS, BLM All the federal agencies.
So, this means I can legally delete my diesel truck, bcuz the DPF, EGR, and having to put DEF in my truck is unconstitutional. The regulation/law enacted by the EPA is unacceptable and hopefully is eradicated.
Of course the bureaucratic JB administration thinks this is terrible.
Most anyone not a moron or a corporate shill knows this is terrible.
Much better to clog up the courts and let uneducated judges determine policy rather than functioning like every other modern country (and how we cleaned up rivers, smog, and figured out you need to refrigerate foods)
You are sooooooo right!
7 July 2024
Thank you Mr. Forbes .
We also need a process that holds everyone accountable for breaking laws and rules. Including presidents. Shouldn’t be just a decision away for us to be under a dictatorship
Exactly! Nancy Pelosi should be in prison for insider trading!
And we should call that process "impeachment". I just made that word up, but you can use it for that purpose.
@@just-some-dude
It’s almost like an impeachment is useless unless one side holds a supermajority, given the political climate in the US.
And of course for one side to hold a supermajority and the other the presidency in and of itself is exceedingly rare…
So the original point went way over your head, huh?
Yes, like 10% for "the big guy!" 🤔
We have been under a bureaucratic dictatorship by the administrative state for quite some time,and you can't fire them or vote them out of office.
All good points
Amen to your comments!
Thanks for sharing Mr Forbes
Centralization of power
What idiocy…
Thank you for explaining this.
You shouldn’t trust his “explanation”. It leaves a lot of crucial details out, about how this is not a good thing. Don’t be fooled, keep looking into it!
What’s bad is people like you who think that corporations should run the world for their shareholders
Try a socialist country instead if that bothers you.
@@solice8844
Or, y’know, we can look at just how many corporations break the existing laws for greed literally all the time and recognize that it’s a major problem that this idiotic decision just exacerbates
Grow a brain!@@solice8844
Do you have a retirement plan. If so, chance🤔 is your a share holder in some BIG Company
I don't think anyone is saying that.
Child support enforcement R.I.P
Supposed expertise indeed.
Thanks Steve for explaining that Chevron thing… hagd
WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO.........
Clear mind and body....competence and ability.........I declare. I will willful. Etc
Just in time to help Boeing.
USA has to do something about China and Russia in Cuba!
This statement is dishonest or ignorant or both. Agencies do not legislate law. They create regulations drafted by people familiar with the job of the particular agency, that are persuasive but not controlling on the courts. Taking away power from the agencies allows more power to the courts. With the present status of the federal courts, this is excellent for big business and horrible for consumers. It's too bad more people don't understand the terrible implications of this decision.
Steve, have you thought about running again?
I think this will make politicians do their job to remove ambiguity from their laws. Purposely passing laws to manipulate an ambiguity loophole so that their "expert" can call shots is ripe for corruption. This is important for my state where they want to get rid of Natural Gas as a fuel source citing cherry picked data that split hairs for efficiency. Millions of homes have natural gas water heaters, dryers and ranges vs electric and would be forced to eventually change over at their own cost. It hit the new construction industry first as now they had to redesign floorplans to allow for larger water heater storage because no new construction was allowed to put in gas water heaters and any new construction that hadn't sold was retrofitted with electric water heaters at builder cost. Just pass along the costs to consumers for a misguided attempt at "going green". What about emissions taxes on older vehicles that punish the poor who can't buy teslas in my state. There are so many things that should have gone to court but didn’t and made life hard for millions based on "expert" opinion.
Steve Forbes is an oligarch that speaks for big business and the ultra-rich. The elimination of Chevron deference leaves the courts to decide on technical issues of all regulations instead of the experts that were put in place in the agencies that are now rendered powerless. And the courts keeping up with all of the decisions to protect the general puplic, that are no longer spread across the appropriate departments, will be an impossible task.
Lack of expert regulation will, once again allow industry to bestow the general public with rampant pollution and unsafe products, to say the least.
Not only that, but are the Courts experts?
So people who you consider experts should decide laws for the country? Unelected person who has a specific degree will decide what is or is not legal? Cut the script
Next-up: "Why big corporations should be allowed to use slaves: The founding fathers thought slavery was fine" 🤮
Right on!! Good news
Damn Karl Marx was right
You are completely wrong.
This is one the best rulings I've seen in decades. We will finally begin to see a break on not just the rules enforced but the costs will go down
Do y’all not realize we have been slaves, our whole entire lives. I can’t wait for things to really change, and we finally be Sovereignty as God wanted us to truly be. God bless all!
This wil also stop food,meat companies from having those pesky regulators stop them from selling tainted foods 😮
Stop them?
That's absurd.
You must not have read any labels in grocery stores now. Hence why America foods are banned globally except for America Citizens to consume. Umkay. I'm now canning to know what is in my food without regulations 😅😅
Aluminum cans soda,beer, etc...have a plastic liner. Had no idea, but yes it's true. Crazy.
@@120offroadllcAll approved by the USDA.
ALWAYS APPRECIATE YOUR ARTICULATE WAY OF EXPLAINING THESE ARTICLES TO MAKE IT UNDERSTANDABLE TO THE AVERAGE PERSON !!!, WELL DONE AGAIN !!!.
HALLELUJAH
owned by Hong Kong-based investment group Integrated Whale Media Investments since 2014. Its chairperson and editor-in-chief is Steve Forbes,
Listening to those that believe all the things that caused all your problems!? Bold strategy. Let’s see how it plays out. 💋🍑👋
Only took 40 years. Took 49 years to overturn Roe v Wade...
1984 a very bad year.
Good year. Bad liberal loony court ruling.
Ugh. Forbes pretends that regulatory capture and lobbyists aren't a thing. This man has no credibility.
So we should disregard the constitution because??? Lobbyists? What lobbying in particular are you referencing? To congress?
@@JakMakes-z5o Did I say disregard the constitution? No - I did not. Forbes' position is exactly what one would expect from an insanely rich person who believes he could have been much richer were it not for pesky regulations - that almost certainly exist for damn good reasons. Forbes' reasons for praising the overturning of the Chevron doctrine aren't motivated by what's best for the country. He likes it because it's good for him.
I think that any ambiguity in the law should be determined by the peoples representatives in Congress and not some political puppet.
Uneducated judges and mostly uneducated reps are much better at understanding technical data about ppm chemicals in groundwater than a scientific expert.
Tegrefully the Supreme Court has became someone’s political appointment with the conservative super majority
@@torturedsoul8066
you mean like Supreme Court justices and other appointed and unelected judges that now have the final say over a lot of the rules and regulations that will be challenged by corporations (not people)?
Since that’s what’s actually happening.
Or would you rather a (potentially) constantly changing and entirely uneducated body of reps put out new rules for literally everything every 2 years?
Because that’s entirely feasible, right?
@@torturedsoul8066
Political puppets like the federal judiciary, appointed without votes and completely uneducated in any of the scientific fields relevant to a majority of these regulations?
Because that’s what the system is now.
But clearly it makes much more sense to have the entire book of laws rewritten every 2 years by people (also uneducated on the relevant info) voted in, right?
Not like the GOP is pushing to drown the globe in oil and light it aflame, while the Dems at least acknowledge the apocalyptic future…. And would obviously want different rules for the EPA….
Oh, wait……..
@@torturedsoul8066
Puppets like the federal judiciary, appointed without votes and completely uneducated in any of the scientific fields relevant to a majority of these regulations?
Because that’s what the system is now.
But clearly it makes much more sense to have the entirety of the rules rewritten every 2 years by people (also uneducated on the relevant info) voted in, right? Cause they’re all gonna agree on those same rules election after election.
The US Supreme Court works slowly, as intended
If by ‘works slowly’ you mean turns the clock back decades at a time….