flight 93 audio (slowed and pitch adjusted)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 авг 2009
  • I slowdown the original recording and adjusted the pitch to have a clearer understanding of what was said. Apparently a bomb on board was reported. Actual interior photo from flight 93.

Комментарии • 134

  • @dainasworldnumbers88
    @dainasworldnumbers88 3 года назад +15

    Thank you for this!

  • @joegilligan4895
    @joegilligan4895 2 года назад +36

    What would I have done? Rest in peace. August 2021

    • @nickolos1995
      @nickolos1995 2 года назад +2

      Couldn't agree more those hero's saved more life's then they could imagine

  • @dwayneflorence4482
    @dwayneflorence4482 2 года назад +16

    God I hate hate. Terrible way to go.

  • @joeguzek7299
    @joeguzek7299 Год назад

    See how much they panic after 93 veers of course without radio contact. So much communication. This is what really happens when a plan goes off track in the air

  • @ralex3697
    @ralex3697 2 года назад +7

    Hella scary

  • @Riceedude
    @Riceedude 3 года назад +27

    Now if this ever happened like all the passengers would just take them down

    • @ItsComplexityHD
      @ItsComplexityHD 2 года назад +2

      There’s to many security measures u can’t really pull this off nowadays

    • @zexxiu1584
      @zexxiu1584 2 года назад +1

      @@ItsComplexityHD unless you’re really really smart, but chances are still low

    • @ntekniklaus3710
      @ntekniklaus3710 2 года назад

      they tried on 93 and failed. gas was laid in the cabin to prevent them from going up but despite using the cart as a ram all they did was flip the plane which is what led to the crash. crash it was part of the plan if failed, after all

    • @sativarosegold3604
      @sativarosegold3604 2 года назад +1

      Right?! They'd be like oh hell no, you're not flying us into a building. Also gathering from all the viral videos people are pretty violent and rabid on flights in general 😆

    • @kylehenline3245
      @kylehenline3245 9 дней назад

      @@ntekniklaus3710 Uh no. There is zero evidence supporting gas in the cabin. There is zero evidence the passengers flipped the plane, it didn't pitch from a back to front shift in weight. It rolled because the terrorists freaked out and started rolling the plane back and forth to try and stop the assault from the passengers. There's no concrete proof of this but quite a few people with way more experience in this than you or I have concluded you can here the passengers breaching the cockpit and the ensuing scuffle just before the plane went into the fatal roll.
      And they didn't fail, the plane didn't reach its target

  • @RIPzippyshare
    @RIPzippyshare 2 года назад +8

    "actual photo of interior"
    isn't this a scene from the movie United 93?

    • @Charriere1906
      @Charriere1906 2 года назад

      No is fake immagine

    • @kylehenline3245
      @kylehenline3245 9 дней назад

      Dunno would have to re watch, but it is entirely possible the movie used real footage of the plane as well. Maybe its just the youtube compression, but that picture is very low quality for a 2006 feature film but just about right for a cheap digital camera from 2001. AFAIK the movie put a good amount of effort into getting things right, the conversations people are having over the airphones in the film are word for word transcriptions of the real calls made that day.

  • @paulhealey7499
    @paulhealey7499 2 года назад +9

    With 93 leaving it's gate late time and info had filtered through to the passengers that is clear. What is unclear is what you would do if the situation was faced by you. It's easy to be brave as an armchair warrior but can you categorically say you would face the challenge in a similar situation? We are all different and just human beings, not invisible Hollywood heroes.

  • @Vipermedic133
    @Vipermedic133 8 лет назад +4

    suppose the hijackers actually got into the cockpit while the aircraft was on the ground

    • @TheBinoyVudi
      @TheBinoyVudi 7 лет назад +14

      these guys were planning this stuff for months.. they knew that it was easy at the time to storm the cockpit about 15 mins after take-off..(back then the pilots would open the cockpit doors while flying - about 15 mins after take-off according to some documentaries i watched) plus all they had to do from that point was to maneuver the plane because it was already airborne..

    • @TheBinoyVudi
      @TheBinoyVudi 2 года назад +5

      @@technotomboy manouvering a plane doesn't require great skill, just a few weeks of training is sufficient. Landing is the hard part . Especially landing in bad weather.

    • @kadiewilliams4759
      @kadiewilliams4759 2 года назад +3

      @@technotomboy yes the hijackers were trained to speak (some sort of english lol) and pilot small planes by al qeuda

    • @BR-it2qe
      @BR-it2qe 2 года назад +6

      @@technotomboy yeah, you don't need to be a pilot to do what they did. The terrorists didn't have to be concerned with taking off or landing. Those are things pilots can do. All they needed to know was how to make the plane go in the direction they wanted once it's already in the air. Stop making a mountain out of a mole hill. It's not that difficult to understand what happened on 9/11

  • @awc222
    @awc222 11 лет назад +16

    Sorry, not FL 93 but FL 77's FDR stated the door was never opened.

    • @fatsonot181
      @fatsonot181 2 года назад

      Hmm any links for this please? Google not showing anything

    • @stampdealer
      @stampdealer 2 года назад +1

      @@fatsonot181 Several years ago there was a video on YT (that now appears to have been deleted), about an hour in length, of a presentation by a forensic examiner of airline crashes and black boxes, and he demonstrated specifically and explicitly how the alleged flight data provided by the FAA/NTSB from the FLT 77 FDR could not have possibly come from the actual aircraft. Two of his major points were that, 1)Upon the first boot-up of an FDR in an aircraft, the FDR is permanently and irrevocably registered via serial number to that specific aircraft. The serial number of the FDR from which the alleged data was provided was "0000000" (or however many zeroes exactly there were, I can't recall precisely). The presenter said that this "all zeroes" serial number was exactly what was used in what are called "bench recorders", which are simply generic FDRs used in testing situations and simulations. They are never installed in an aircraft, and are used repeatedly, with data entered and erased, repeatedly. 2)One of the many data inputs recorded by FDRs is the opening and closing of the cockpit door. The examiner said that the FDR in question indicates the closing of the cockpit door prior to departure from Dulles, but there is no data indicating that it was ever opened again. He pointed out many other inconsistences in the alleged data, but I can't really recall them off the top of my head. I had the video saved in a specific 9/11 playlist, but it, and many other videos, have been deleted by YT. I will try to find it again for you, and I would like to watch it again myself. I hope you found this at least somewhat helpful.

    • @fatsonot181
      @fatsonot181 2 года назад

      @@stampdealer Thank you for taking the time to explain. Yes, YT has shadow banned (doesn't show in search results) or deleted several videos related to that day. Those are interesting points. Since it is an electronic device, I wonder if in past FDR has failed to record cockpit movements on some flights due to any technical errors / malfunctioning. If at all it's just a simulation fdr then not having cockpit recoding makes sense... Btw, listen to NORAD 9/11 tapes. It's on YT. They are direct transmission recoding of FAA ATC and all 4 flights from that day. There's even a moment where UA175 pilot confirms spotting AA11 nearby below their flight to the ATC because AA11 wasn't responding to radio calls. And UA175 pilot says he heard a suspicious transmission "we have some planes". Moments later they themselves get hijacked and stop responding. Gives a real-time perspective of how fast it all happened and the chaos in handling by the sheer surprise and lack of time to coordinate.

  • @birdman631
    @birdman631 11 лет назад +10

    ...Yes it did? Where do you get your information, Facebook?

    • @birdman631
      @birdman631 4 года назад +2

      @I Am HUh1?1?

    • @birdman631
      @birdman631 4 года назад +1

      @I Am Ok bud 🤣

    • @birdman631
      @birdman631 4 года назад +1

      @I Am Ya oK bUd.

    • @birdman631
      @birdman631 4 года назад +2

      @I Am Allow me to teach you TWO things about being an adult.
      1: Think for yourself, dont prescribe to ONE way of thinking. There is nothing wrong with being a conservative and a liberal, or something completely different. Mix it up.
      2: Say what you mean, and act on it. Dont say you're done with this conversation and come back as soon as someone agro's you.
      So here I am ending the conversation, and I mean that kid. Goodluck, atleast you know the government destroyed the towers.

    • @aeroalt
      @aeroalt 2 года назад +2

      What is happening here?

  • @birdman631
    @birdman631 11 лет назад +2

    Nope

  • @jeffjeff4477
    @jeffjeff4477 5 лет назад +4

    Full Sized Drones folks

    • @BR-it2qe
      @BR-it2qe 2 года назад +3

      Full sized idiots believe that

  • @awc222
    @awc222 11 лет назад +11

    Convenient, isn't it? And yet, the FDR said the cockpit door never opened during flight. Interesting, isn't it?

    • @titanuscreature4485
      @titanuscreature4485 3 года назад +4

      I read the cvr transcript a hundred times and it's very clear the cockpit door was opened. Because you hear a loud grunt and then a passenger screams no indicating they made it into the cockpit. Passenger had control of the plane at one point then a hijacker foils it by forcing it down. If the tapes were released then it would for sure be clear what is happening.

    • @TheHergeea
      @TheHergeea 2 года назад

      Nope

    • @fatsonot181
      @fatsonot181 2 года назад

      @@titanuscreature4485 why do they not release it?

  • @andrewasp6043
    @andrewasp6043 6 лет назад +3

    Keep drink he KOOL-AID Neo!

    • @SimpleManGuitars1973
      @SimpleManGuitars1973 5 лет назад

      You first. Please!

    • @roquefortfiles
      @roquefortfiles 5 лет назад +10

      Another conspiracy fucktard.. Eye roll. You people need to be sitting in a psychiatrists office flipping through the magazines waiting to lie down on the big sofa.

  • @andrewasp6043
    @andrewasp6043 6 лет назад

    Why don’t you be a sheep and head to that SLAUGHTER HOUSE NEO!

  • @joelunchbox4146
    @joelunchbox4146 6 лет назад +3

    No planes were used

  • @alfie8472
    @alfie8472 5 лет назад +4

    Everyone see that plane that went down in Africa recently, there was wreckage & debris for miles. As opposed to a hole in the ground in Pennsylvania where the plane just disappeared with no sign of a plane, wreckage, luggage or people. What a joke.

    • @usmcpound
      @usmcpound 5 лет назад +5

      I'm no conspiracy theorist, but the reason there wasn't miles of debris from flight 93 is because it went into the ground at almost a 90 angle.
      One thing I do question about flight 93, however, is why don't we see ANY debris?

    • @alfie8472
      @alfie8472 5 лет назад

      Because it wasn't Flight 93. It was switched mid air during the war game simulations like the other planes. Flight 93 was landed at a military base like the other planes, & the passengers killed there.

    • @kellymeggison9418
      @kellymeggison9418 5 лет назад +3

      usmcpound, the flight path was actually almost 45 degrees and Completely inverted, upside down! There would still be wreckage, alot of it, and fire, burning debris, bodies and parts of bodies, etc! When people who responded first say there was no plane there, I believe it! When a coroner says he stopped being a coroner there because there were no bodies, and that he hadn't seen a single drop of blood "not one drop", I believe it! When I see pictures of the smoke cloud, singular rather than recurring, above the tree line I'm fairly certain what I'm seeing is an ordnance explosion rather than the chaotic explosions and fires of a plane crash! Remember too, that this was a reclaimed field with shallow depths of loam over lots of gravelly fill, so I'm fairly certain nothing really penetrated the ground to any degree worth mentioning!

    • @alfie8472
      @alfie8472 4 года назад

      @Fui Gebhardt1 Why don't you reply in a proper way & tell me why I am wrong, instead of just spewing rambling garbage you fool.

    • @gabisasmr
      @gabisasmr 3 года назад +2

      It's because the plane went into the ground like 20 something feet deep and they recovered some stuff in the ground they were going really fast

  • @shiloniousmonk
    @shiloniousmonk 6 лет назад +5

    Hooooooaaaxxx!!!!

    • @mclaurinxjuju3647
      @mclaurinxjuju3647 4 года назад +24

      Duuuummmbbbbbaaaaassssssss!!!!

    • @mclaurinxjuju3647
      @mclaurinxjuju3647 2 года назад +4

      @turboprop flight simulator fan I suck cks? took you a year for that? seriously?

    • @lavenderlover5549
      @lavenderlover5549 2 года назад

      @@mclaurinxjuju3647 😂😂😂😂😂 you’re so funny omg 😭

    • @awc222
      @awc222 2 года назад +1

      100% faked