Thank you for doing this series. I have always studied Revelation from a futuristic/dispensational point of view but this has really made me reevaluate my understanding of the book of Revelation.
Probably the fourth time I’ve listened to some parts of the series. Some fantastic information. You have probably seen me comment before. I definitely think you have the right approach, but I certainly have a different angle on a reasonable amount of stuff. Maybe if I’m ever in America I could sit down and talk some stuff through. From early on the four Beasts are clearly a representation of the four main Tribes worshipping as they did around the Tabernacle. Not the representation of nature as yourself and most Preterists say. This theme early in the Book of Revelation hinders quite a bit in the Book of Revelations understanding. There’s other similar themes that I think are explained and meant differently. But generally I still thank you for this wonderful series, which did encourage me to resume my Bible Prophecy studies which I started a long time ago. I never even knew what preterism was until your series. All I knew is I studied the Bible endlessly and I knew most were way wrong. Have been shocked to listen to your stuff as it confirmed a lot of what I was positive the Bible was teaching. I remember years ago when I finally understood the book of Isaiah , how I suddenly found myself at odds with most Christian’s. Revelation soon became the same. Thanks again for your time and effort.
Marrying this series with that of RC. Sproul, Ken Gentry Jr, Doug Wilson, Jeff Durbin, and now James White (recently flipped his perspective to a Partical Pretorist, Post Mil view) all this clarity removes the paralysing fear caused by the erroneous futurist view. I now understand what is in view when Jesus says “ as on the days of Noah…”. He and his family were LEFT BEHIND, SAVED IN THE ARK” all the rest were caught up in the flood. Turns Larry Norman’s song “Guns and Wars” upside down.
Possible addition to the explanation of the sign of the woman starting at timestamp 17:12, combining Gore's symbolism with astrological signs... "A great sign" = constellation in the sky (Gen 1:14-19); "in heaven" = in the sky; "a woman" = the ecliptic constellation Virgo; "clothed with the sun" = the sun's ecliptic position within Virgo; "the moon" = a positioning of the moon underneath Virgo; "twelve stars" = the constellation Leo (lion) which sits above Virgo and contains 9 stars + a positioning of Venus, Mars & Mercury = 12 "stars"; "the dragon" = likely either Hydra or Scorpio. When were all of these perfectly aligned in the way that John describes, and aligns with other significant calendrical events? Sept 11, 3BC - a potential date for Christ's birth, also considering the essential debate on when King Herod died (this view takes the later date). Dr. Michael Heiser was not a preterist, but I think that his research in the specific area of astronomy pairs well with a preterist view of Revelation.
Mistake. Israel has the moon under her feet - her lunar months and calender and clothed in the sun - her days and weeks and sabbaths. The 12 stars are thr 12 tribes and the child is the christ
Christ was born 'son of David,' of the Jewish nation 'according to the flesh' (Rom. 9:5), the true 'seed of Abraham' (Gal. 3:16). True Israel is the true church, and vice versa.
Hilarious, the snake says that those words had a meaning for Ahaz but I'm not going to explore it, then the hand jester jumps into the Fake Testament and the brite morning star called christ! 😂😂🤣🤣
@White Raptor News thanks for asking! The ONE TRUE CREATOR of ALL things seen and unseen. God is NOT a man that HE should lie, nor the son of man, that HE should repent ~ Numbers 23:19
More Protestant heresy! @15:50, the woman is obviously the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God and Queen of heaven. Someone whom Protestant heretics love to hate or ignore. "The woman" is also the Bride of Christ, the Catholic Church he established (of whom Christ repeatedly refers to himself as its bridegroom). And the 12 stars are the 12 tribes of Israel that will eventually be converted (as per Romans 11:26-28) as well as the 12 apostles that will be sitting on the throne seats of heaven.
@@sparkyy0007 She is the ark of the new covenant by the old church teaching. I personally don’t consider that to be too much of a stretch. Great series. 3rd time listening
I am learning so much!!! There's nothing else online like it. I listen to all your sermons!
Thank you for doing this series. I have always studied Revelation from a futuristic/dispensational point of view but this has really made me reevaluate my understanding of the book of Revelation.
Such a wonderful lecture. Thanks for all you do, Mr. Gore!
Thank you for the encouragement!
Delighted for the return of this series!
Probably the fourth time I’ve listened to some parts of the series. Some fantastic information. You have probably seen me comment before. I definitely think you have the right approach, but I certainly have a different angle on a reasonable amount of stuff. Maybe if I’m ever in America I could sit down and talk some stuff through. From early on the four Beasts are clearly a representation of the four main Tribes worshipping as they did around the Tabernacle. Not the representation of nature as yourself and most Preterists say. This theme early in the Book of Revelation hinders quite a bit in the Book of Revelations understanding. There’s other similar themes that I think are explained and meant differently. But generally I still thank you for this wonderful series, which did encourage me to resume my Bible Prophecy studies which I started a long time ago. I never even knew what preterism was until your series. All I knew is I studied the Bible endlessly and I knew most were way wrong. Have been shocked to listen to your stuff as it confirmed a lot of what I was positive the Bible was teaching. I remember years ago when I finally understood the book of Isaiah , how I suddenly found myself at odds with most Christian’s. Revelation soon became the same. Thanks again for your time and effort.
Thanks for your interest and your very thoughtful comments!
Thanx Bruce. And a most hardy welcome back to you!!
SERIOUSLY missed this series, man! So glad you are back... Thank you so much!
Thank you Mr. Gore for the dedication to the text.
Delighted to see you strong and healthy Sir.
Thanks Bruce…
Marrying this series with that of RC. Sproul, Ken Gentry Jr, Doug Wilson, Jeff Durbin, and now James White (recently flipped his perspective to a Partical Pretorist, Post Mil view) all this clarity removes the paralysing fear caused by the erroneous futurist view. I now understand what is in view when Jesus says “ as on the days of Noah…”. He and his family were LEFT BEHIND, SAVED IN THE ARK” all the rest were caught up in the flood. Turns Larry Norman’s song “Guns and Wars” upside down.
Thank you for this post. I hope you are well. GOD bless you.
cree983 Thank you! I am quite well for an old guy!
Thank you!
Keep loving and teaching. God bless and give you peace.
I have been looking forward to the resumption of these lectures. Welcome back.
Angela Katsapas Thank you! And welcome back yourself!
@@GoreBruce Thank you.
May Father YAHweh bless your understanding. Praise Father YAHweh.
I'm glad you are back. love you
Possible addition to the explanation of the sign of the woman starting at timestamp 17:12, combining Gore's symbolism with astrological signs... "A great sign" = constellation in the sky (Gen 1:14-19); "in heaven" = in the sky; "a woman" = the ecliptic constellation Virgo; "clothed with the sun" = the sun's ecliptic position within Virgo; "the moon" = a positioning of the moon underneath Virgo; "twelve stars" = the constellation Leo (lion) which sits above Virgo and contains 9 stars + a positioning of Venus, Mars & Mercury = 12 "stars"; "the dragon" = likely either Hydra or Scorpio. When were all of these perfectly aligned in the way that John describes, and aligns with other significant calendrical events? Sept 11, 3BC - a potential date for Christ's birth, also considering the essential debate on when King Herod died (this view takes the later date). Dr. Michael Heiser was not a preterist, but I think that his research in the specific area of astronomy pairs well with a preterist view of Revelation.
Profitable as always.......
Apocalypse uncancelled
Thank you. ..our
Tribulation is also 3.5 years/1260 days.
God really doesn't change, huh🙏🏼💖
Mistake. Israel has the moon under her feet - her lunar months and calender and clothed in the sun - her days and weeks and sabbaths. The 12 stars are thr 12 tribes and the child is the christ
Bruce, a you saying that the Church gave birth to the Christ?
Christ was born 'son of David,' of the Jewish nation 'according to the flesh' (Rom. 9:5), the true 'seed of Abraham' (Gal. 3:16). True Israel is the true church, and vice versa.
MOST BLESSED OF SONS IS ASHER DEUTERONOMY CHAPTER 33 VERSE 24 TO CHAPTER 34
I would recommend not drifting to so much unrelated information...very slow and uninteresting explanations
Gross darkness means no more technology, thank George Bush for that. Hallelujah
Hilarious, the snake says that those words had a meaning for Ahaz but I'm not going to explore it, then the hand jester jumps into the Fake Testament and the brite morning star called christ!
😂😂🤣🤣
@White Raptor News thanks for asking! The ONE TRUE CREATOR of ALL things seen and unseen.
God is NOT a man that HE should lie, nor the son of man, that HE should repent ~ Numbers 23:19
More Protestant heresy! @15:50, the woman is obviously the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God and Queen of heaven. Someone whom Protestant heretics love to hate or ignore. "The woman" is also the Bride of Christ, the Catholic Church he established (of whom Christ repeatedly refers to himself as its bridegroom). And the 12 stars are the 12 tribes of Israel that will eventually be converted (as per Romans 11:26-28) as well as the 12 apostles that will be sitting on the throne seats of heaven.
The virgin Mary, Jesus mother is also Jesus new bride ?
Jesus old bride, the Harlet...who was she ?
@@sparkyy0007 She is the ark of the new covenant by the old church teaching. I personally don’t consider that to be too much of a stretch. Great series. 3rd time listening