If what I've read about the aircrafts history is correct it's fuel, t stoff and c stoff created the explosive thrust that enabled it to climb to its maximum height in record Time, however it was known that the fuel tank often leaked resulting in the pilot being dissolved, it was a proper widow maker
Exceeding the mach limit in a slight climb. Now that is nuts and would undoubtedly be annoying for the man closing on his potential kill. An advanced but treacherous aircraft. I look forward to part 2.
This was primarily used as an interceptor to defend military airfields from allied attack. Despite its obvious speed advantages its higher closing speeds was also a liability as it made bearing guns down onto allied aircraft more difficult and because of its relatively short range once its fuel was exhausted it then made it very vulnerable to allied attack as it glided back to base
Another excellent video. I can only imagine the bravery of the Luftwaffe pilots manning this volatile aircraft in desperate times. Can't wait to see part 2!
Always good stuff on your channel. I understand the redoubtable Eric Winkle Brown flew one after encountering it on a captured German airfield and ordering the aghast ground crew to fuel it up. What a pair he had.
I read the book called Allied Jet killers of world war 2 by Osprey Publishing it’s got a lot of stories of Allied pilots who claimed German Jet kills great video I can’t wait for part 2.
Another excellent video (like the He-162) on a little covered subject. The chemicals, called T-stoff and C-stoff, were unstabale and EXTREMELY corrosive. I read that at least in one case a leak from a ruptured fuel line "literally melted away" a pilot ....
Thank you! Yes, the fuel was the trickiest thing about the Me-163. Some pilots came in contact with it and suffered injuries and there was at least one case of a pilot who died from it.
The 163 wings had to be swept back to provide longitudinal stability and control because there was no horizontal tail. If the wing had been straight the negative pitching moment of the airfoil would have been uncontrollable. You need surfaces aft of the CG that provide a compensating positive moment, and you get them back there with wing sweep. This is why flying wing aircraft had swept wings long before compressibility was a problem.
That the 262 swept-back was accidental due to CoG issues is a silly but persistent allied propaganda myth Eric, obvious if one thinks about it for a moment.
@@drstrangelove4998me262 swept wing was really very lttle i doubt it was there for high speed flight it was a bonus over C/G correction but max speed of me262 clean test a/c was 624mph in 1944 no doubt the modest sweep of wing helped achieve this speed
Komets had some success at taking P51 down. August 1944 three komets from Jadgeschwader 400 shot down three P51b from the 352 American fighter group. A common komet landing tactic was to dive at very high speed straight down without power to their airfield after the fuel was gone and circle very close to the field protected by normal fighters and AA guns. More then likely the komet that the pilot counted as a probable got away. The moment could dive and recover at very high speeds unlike the P38 that would suffer compressabilty if they tried a max dive.
I hope in part 2 you show that Comet victory over a Mosquito. The Comets' fuel burn was just coming to its end and a Mosquito was chasing it, but in the dogfight the Mosquito overshot in the turn and the Comet pilot pressed his guns and down went the Mosquito. *From a Comet pilots own account. I think the Comet concept was to use very high altitude as a potential energy source and then glide in and out of bomber formations. And because of its aerodynamic shape it could continue to fly at high speed even in glide mode. Then I am guessing the pilot would use the remaining speed at medium altitude and themals just like a normal glider to again gain altitude. This could go on for many miles radius and it could keep up with the bomber formations.🐞
Not many aircraft are powered with a hypogolic fuel that dissolves its pilot and requires wearing a rubber flightsuit to avoid it. Amazingly "Winkle" Brown took one up for a successful powered flight, with the aid of an experienced Luftwaffe ground crew. In fact, I think the only test flight he turned down was to try a flight in a Natter (Adder), the manned surface to air missile intended for disrupting the bomber streams. Post War a number of countries built rocket boosted fighters, some were more rocket booster than anything else. My favourite example(s) was the Saunders Roe SR 53 and SR 177 family. This was under development for both RN and RAF. A conventional jet engine for sustained flight and a controllable powerful liquid fuel motor mounted on top for boost and sprint. The Royal Navy version was to be carrier capable, fuelled with hydrocarbon plus liquid oxygen prepared on the carrier itself. This was thought relatively safe as LOX spillages could be washed down. The RN was already boosting the oxygen content of its torpedo oxidant so had practice. . The Federal German Luftwaffe seriously considered the RAF Saunders Roe as a replacement for its ageing Sabres. As a manned test bed for near space entry the US trialled a F104, with an auxiliary controllable liquid fuel booster at the tail, there must have been other examples.
Beautiful episode :3 i have paper model of red Me163 and it looks awesome ❤ I can't wait to see next part :3 will be mentioning of many accidents of this airplane?
Painted red red barron maybe not could be for visual ID for experimental very fast a/c some FW 190Ds were painted red underneath for ID to avoid friendly ground fire when defending 262 airbases
The explanation with mechanics painting the airplane red was given by Späte himself in a book he co-authored. He also remembers he was worried about being spotted easily with such a bright livery.
It's interesting to talk about this rocket fighter plane that had overtaken 1000 km/h, exactly 1002 km/h. I think in part two you will present the success of this bird which starded to reach the critic mach. At this period of the war, the german tried all the experimentation, 2000 research laboratories worked about new weapons !!! US made the X-15 which is a rocket aircraft but it reached mach 7.
Ce zinc était une bombe à retardement. Aussi bien en vol car se retrouve dans le transonique et les commandes qui figent ou atterrissage dur qui fait péter les réservoir si il reste de oxyde nitrique et methanol 💥boum assuré. Par contre sais pas si il a abattu des zincs alliés
@@dominiqueroudier9401 Si je crois un MOSQUITO en repérage photo à haute altitude, c'est la seule victoire que je connaisse dans de lointains souvenirs, il y en a peut être des autres, on va voir cela en partie 2.
@@dominiqueroudier9401 Il a abattu 16 bombardiers, SOURCES WIKIPEDIA. Mais au prix de pertes très conséquentes, cet avion fut un échec mais très intéressant à étudier.
@@jeannezehner9450 et vu la vitesse de rapprochement sur cible lente, peu de temps pour viser, le canon de 30 a faible cadence et vitesse obus initiale c'est 350 m seconde je crois
"Please government, mein children need books for school." "Sorry there is no money." "We build a machine that can kill a ton of people." "Have this truckload of pure gold, good Sir!"
The Japanese were given the design of the engine and airframe. The Japanese engineers were not too pleased that the rocket ended its fuel in two minutes, making the plane a glider. So, the Japanese prototype was not a copy: it had two engines. When one engine finished the fuel, the pilot could start the second engine, at his choice.
The rocket fuel could dissolve flesh or any other organic material it came in contact with, but I think there waa just one case in which a pilot actually died this way. Some were injured by the fuel but survived.
@@showtime112t-stof dissolved one pilot. They were very prone to explosions, the cradle could knock the plane into the ground, it could flame out on takeoff, even ekplode from rough landings.
Lord Hardthrasher just did a take down of the development of the Me-163. His opinion of its tactical value was, let's say, negative. And hilarious. ruclips.net/video/_cvyjm9v5WI/видео.htmlsi=YC0WW0QKyuHLGMsw Great video! I just wish I didn't have to wait for part 2
A wonder and a miracle are similar words. Both seem to be in use in English when people talk about 'Wunderwaffen'. Personally, I like 'wonder weapons' more.
Fortunately ,this plane was not a good dogfighter!!!. I dont know all the history about this. I know it was dangerous during a hard landing, because the methanol" was highly explosive if where présent in tanks
@@showtime112 yes and i can add that when Komet arrive close to target too fast , only few seconds to aim and opening fire, despite of ...hit target. 30mm Guns have also à low speed of fire, and shell runs only 350 m/s. So very difficult to do all thèse in 5 second. Job for "experten"
3:40 - It's not "Mark 108". The "Mk" in Mk-108 stands for Maschinenkanone (Machine Cannon), just as "MG" in MG-151 stands for Maschinengewehr (Machine rifle [gun]).
From these images @0:25 and following, the reproduction is wrong, the swastika is missing from the vertical tail. It's important to avoid changing history as we see too often now... Nevertheless, apart from a few small errors (nobody's perfect), it's a great video.
Great video and it is very informative. However, I advise you not to use fake "gun camera newsreel" shots, as it undermines the authenticity of what you are doing. Everybody is fake nowadays --- you should be the exception.
Thank you for the feedback. Regarding the authenticity issue, I don't see it that way. 'Fake' would be creating something which never happened and then trying to convince people that it did. The whole point of these videos is to visualize things which actually happened (or at least, which sources describe as such). One day, we should be able to create footage which will look 100% authentic. As long as you make clear they are created (and in the case of gun camera in this video, they obviously are), I don't see a problem. If I could make a video look completely like original footage, I'd do it.
@@showtime112 It's not real gun camera footage, but it is altered to look like it. You are not showing us the real event, but your reenactment of it. That is OK, but it would be better if you had said, "this is a reenactment to show what it looked like." You add to the deception by showing a pretend gun camera take without mentioning that the take isn't real either. Why?
If you see it that way, no design is really 'late war'. The design of every aircraft which entered service in the 1944-45 period really started much earlier.
If you are referring to descriptions by Allied pilots, they sometimes called all of them 'jets' or 'jetties' because their intel on the subject was quite limited.
The color scheme is incomplete and historically inaccurate. It's also cowardly to avoid depicting it accurately, because of the desire to please society.
Took a lot of courage and skill as a German pilot to strap into the comet. RESPECT
Thanks!
Thank you very much for another donation!
Thanks!
Thank you for the donation!
Everyone knows red means fast. Painting the rocket plane red was a stroke of genius!
From everything I have ever read about the Me-163 it seems like it was a dangerous and difficult plane to master. Looking forward to part 2 !
Just getting near that thing was a gamble :) Thank you for the feedback!
If what I've read about the aircrafts history is correct it's fuel, t stoff and c stoff created the explosive thrust that enabled it to climb to its maximum height in record Time, however it was known that the fuel tank often leaked resulting in the pilot being dissolved, it was a proper widow maker
@@GaryPrice-nv1jc IIRC the pilots had rubberized flight overalls because of that.
@@GaryPrice-nv1jc i think if oxygen or air came in contact with t or c stoff it would instantly explode
According to Winkle Brown it was very nice flying aeroplane. But the fuel used was dangerous.
Great Quality man. Fantastic. Love the Komet. Subscribed.
P38 too...beautiful graphics and storytelling. Chapeau.
That's very positive indeed 😁 Thank you very much for watching and subscribing!
This was a Death Trap. ( And Hardthrasher just released a couple of deep dives into this if anyone wants a deeper dive).
Yes, flying the Komet was a huge gamble (as will become even more obvious in the follow-up videos)
Excellent as always
I appreciate your positive feedback!
Great vid as always Showtime! Can't wait for the next one!!!!!
Thank you, glad you liked it!
Excellent presentation
Thank you very much!
Exceeding the mach limit in a slight climb. Now that is nuts and would undoubtedly be annoying for the man closing on his potential kill.
An advanced but treacherous aircraft. I look forward to part 2.
This aircraft could really take you by surprise :) Thank you for commenting!
I can't get over how well done and realistic these are. And how careful record keeping was back then.
I appreciate the comment! Records were pretty accurate and many of them survived which is lucky for us.
This was primarily used as an interceptor to defend military airfields from allied attack. Despite its obvious speed advantages its higher closing speeds was also a liability as it made bearing guns down onto allied aircraft more difficult and because of its relatively short range once its fuel was exhausted it then made it very vulnerable to allied attack as it glided back to base
Another excellent video. I can only imagine the bravery of the Luftwaffe pilots manning this volatile aircraft in desperate times. Can't wait to see part 2!
Thanks! Part two coming up relatively soon. And part three as well.
Brutal!!!!
Extraordinario trabajo. Muchas gracias
Thank you very much for the positive comment!
Always good stuff on your channel. I understand the redoubtable Eric Winkle Brown flew one after encountering it on a captured German airfield and ordering the aghast ground crew to fuel it up. What a pair he had.
Thank you for the feedback! Eric Brown probably had one of the most interesting pilot careers of all times.
The ground crew had him write up a disclaimer didn't they?
I read his book. It climbed so fast the horizon wasn't visible so he had to rely on instruments even in broad daylight!
@@NetZeroNoHe quickly became member of Kamikaze brotherhood haha😂
@@showtime112 komet could have been towed aloft and glided for test flight much safer
I read the book called Allied Jet killers of world war 2 by Osprey Publishing it’s got a lot of stories of Allied pilots who claimed German Jet kills great video I can’t wait for part 2.
It was one of the sources used for this video. Thank you for commenting!
@@showtime112 Osprey Publishing have published alot of books on the Airwar in Europe. Including books on particular Jagdgeswaders.
Great video !!
Thank you very much for the feedback!
Fire video mate
Happy to hear it, thank you!
Another excellent video (like the He-162) on a little covered subject. The chemicals, called T-stoff and C-stoff, were unstabale and EXTREMELY corrosive. I read that at least in one case a leak from a ruptured fuel line "literally melted away" a pilot ....
Thank you! Yes, the fuel was the trickiest thing about the Me-163. Some pilots came in contact with it and suffered injuries and there was at least one case of a pilot who died from it.
The 163 swept back wings were designed from the start and were more swept than 262 which wing sweep were incidental to correct CG..
The 163 wings had to be swept back to provide longitudinal stability and control because there was no horizontal tail. If the wing had been straight the negative pitching moment of the airfoil would have been uncontrollable. You need surfaces aft of the CG that provide a compensating positive moment, and you get them back there with wing sweep. This is why flying wing aircraft had swept wings long before compressibility was a problem.
That the 262 swept-back was accidental due to CoG issues is a silly but persistent allied propaganda myth Eric, obvious if one thinks about it for a moment.
@@drstrangelove4998me262 swept wing was really very lttle i doubt it was there for high speed flight it was a bonus over C/G correction but max speed of me262 clean test a/c was 624mph in 1944 no doubt the modest sweep of wing helped achieve this speed
Komets had some success at taking P51 down. August 1944 three komets from Jadgeschwader 400 shot down three P51b from the 352 American fighter group. A common komet landing tactic was to dive at very high speed straight down without power to their airfield after the fuel was gone and circle very close to the field protected by normal fighters and AA guns.
More then likely the komet that the pilot counted as a probable got away. The moment could dive and recover at very high speeds unlike the P38 that would suffer compressabilty if they tried a max dive.
What's the source on the P-51 shootdowns?
Excellent Video presentation.
I appreciate your support, thank you!
Cool video, looking forward to part two!
Thank you very much! It's being worked on.
Muito bom vídeo e de excelente qualidade. Saudações do Brasil 🇧🇷
Muito obrigado! I'm happy to hear you liked it.
Fascinating video. Great topic to cover Showtime!
I'm happy to hear that, thanks!
Great work!
I appreciate your positive feedback!
Awesome video. Thank you.
I'm happy to hear you liked it!
I hope in part 2 you show that Comet victory over a Mosquito. The Comets' fuel burn was just coming to its end and a Mosquito was chasing it, but in the dogfight the Mosquito overshot in the turn and the Comet pilot pressed his guns and down went the Mosquito.
*From a Comet pilots own account.
I think the Comet concept was to use very high altitude as a potential energy source and then glide in and out of bomber formations. And because of its aerodynamic shape it could continue to fly at high speed even in glide mode. Then I am guessing the pilot would use the remaining speed at medium altitude and themals just like a normal glider to again gain altitude. This could go on for many miles radius and it could keep up with the bomber formations.🐞
Spoiler alert, the Mosquito story won't be in part two as there's a lot more material and I won't get that far.
@@showtime112Well that’s a pity isn’t it.
Don’t expect to find anything positive moha…
Not many aircraft are powered with a hypogolic fuel that dissolves its pilot and requires wearing a rubber flightsuit to avoid it. Amazingly "Winkle" Brown took one up for a successful powered flight, with the aid of an experienced Luftwaffe ground crew. In fact, I think the only test flight he turned down was to try a flight in a Natter (Adder), the manned surface to air missile intended for disrupting the bomber streams.
Post War a number of countries built rocket boosted fighters, some were more rocket booster than anything else. My favourite example(s) was the Saunders Roe SR 53 and SR 177 family. This was under development for both RN and RAF. A conventional jet engine for sustained flight and a controllable powerful liquid fuel motor mounted on top for boost and sprint. The Royal Navy version was to be carrier capable, fuelled with hydrocarbon plus liquid oxygen prepared on the carrier itself. This was thought relatively safe as LOX spillages could be washed down. The RN was already boosting the oxygen content of its torpedo oxidant so had practice. .
The Federal German Luftwaffe seriously considered the RAF Saunders Roe as a replacement for its ageing Sabres.
As a manned test bed for near space entry the US trialled a F104, with an auxiliary controllable liquid fuel booster at the tail, there must have been other examples.
Beautiful episode :3 i have paper model of red Me163 and it looks awesome ❤
I can't wait to see next part :3 will be mentioning of many accidents of this airplane?
Thank you for the positive feedback! Yes, some of these accidents will be shown.
Thanks so much for the video.
Thank you for watching it!
Al Lippisch liked his tail-less designs that looked like flying shovels.
I've never heard that comparison but not a bad one :)
82ND AIRBORNE
2 hours ago?? Still fresh...
Hell yah !
I'm on night shift, I have 0.5 hour coffee, time for some Showtime 112.
Don't get fired because of the video :)
The legend beneath Baron von Munchausen astride a jet - powered flea says : " like a flea, but oho !
I was suprised, when I watched this movie and saw how many units were using this plane
9 no horizontal stabilizer
Painted red red barron maybe not could be for visual ID for experimental very fast a/c some FW 190Ds were painted red underneath for ID to avoid friendly ground fire when defending 262 airbases
The explanation with mechanics painting the airplane red was given by Späte himself in a book he co-authored. He also remembers he was worried about being spotted easily with such a bright livery.
@@showtime112 research is excellent
So that's where the creator of the original Gundam got the idea for the Red Comet....
Possibly but that's not my area of expertise so I can't confirm it :)
It's interesting to talk about this rocket fighter plane that had overtaken 1000 km/h, exactly 1002 km/h.
I think in part two you will present the success of this bird which starded to reach the critic mach.
At this period of the war, the german tried all the experimentation, 2000 research laboratories worked about new weapons !!!
US made the X-15 which is a rocket aircraft but it reached mach 7.
Ce zinc était une bombe à retardement. Aussi bien en vol car se retrouve dans le transonique et les commandes qui figent ou atterrissage dur qui fait péter les réservoir si il reste de oxyde nitrique et methanol 💥boum assuré. Par contre sais pas si il a abattu des zincs alliés
@@dominiqueroudier9401
Si je crois un MOSQUITO en repérage photo à haute altitude, c'est la seule victoire que je connaisse dans de lointains souvenirs, il y en a peut être des autres, on va voir cela en partie 2.
@@dominiqueroudier9401
Il a abattu 16 bombardiers, SOURCES WIKIPEDIA.
Mais au prix de pertes très conséquentes, cet avion fut un échec mais très intéressant à étudier.
@@jeannezehner9450 et vu la vitesse de rapprochement sur cible lente, peu de temps pour viser, le canon de 30 a faible cadence et vitesse obus initiale c'est 350 m seconde je crois
I don't want to spoil too much but yes, part two will show the 'greatest hits' of the rocket fighter. Thanks for another comment!
Nice video 👍
Thank you!
"Please government, mein children need books for school."
"Sorry there is no money."
"We build a machine that can kill a ton of people."
"Have this truckload of pure gold, good Sir!"
Truckload of pure gold? Also the Germans weren't lacking in education hence the rocket fighter.
@@JoeyStarley write me a poem, bot!
Reminds me of the book "Rocket Fighter" by Mano Ziegler. He was a 163 pilot. I read it twice, it was good.
The fuel was extremely volatile. There were explosions while refueling.
Very impressive graphics and action!! Thanks again S112
I appreciate the positive comment!
A great book on the Me163 is "Rocket Fighter" by William Green
This jet was as dangerous to its pilot as to an enemy bomber, if not more so. Its two-part fuel was both highly volatile and extremely corrosive.
The Japanese were given the design of the engine and airframe. The Japanese engineers were not too pleased that the rocket ended its fuel in two minutes, making the plane a glider. So, the Japanese prototype was not a copy: it had two engines. When one engine finished the fuel, the pilot could start the second engine, at his choice.
Beautiful German superior technology.
the Yokosuka MXY-7 Ohka was technically also a rocket powered war plane fielded by by Japan against Allied ships..
Yes, but it wasn't a fighter. It was basically a missile with human guidance.
The insanity is that Me-163 is not only the only rocket figher, but at them same time also the only glide fighter in history to my knowlegde.
I didn't think of it that way but you seem to be right :)
@@showtime112 It seems to be that way. Considering that dedicated gilde-bombers acutally existed. The soviets had them as far as i know.
was it effective in actual combat?
Only in the hands of a very skilled pilot.
I would imagine it was designed primarily to quickly get high over the bomber formations and hit them fast on the way down.
Questi video sono ottimi e molto informativi. 👍🍀🤩😎✨⭐🤗
Thank you very much for your positive comment!
Graat presentation especially about the Red Komet. Didn't know about this one. Great job 👏 and lokking forward to the 2nd part. ♠️🎩🎯🎱🇺🇸🇮🇱🇺🇦🔱🌼🏵️🌸💮🏴☠️🏹
Deine Aussprache der deutschen Wörter ist hervorragend, ebenso wie das Video.
Thank you very much! I studied German many years ago. I forgot most of the vocabulary and grammar but pronunciation rules are still in my mind 😊
Is the footage taken from one of the IL-2 games?
No, it's from War Thunder
Germans were operating allied fighters no doubt allies knew this and made them potential enemy a/c in certain situations.
I aways wondered why they didn´t use catapults to lounch it. Getting of the ground took a lot of fuel, and here was not a lot of that...
The Komet was too fast and very lethal but more dangerous to its own pilot anyways...
I miss the Red Storm Rising ones. :(
Wow they even sprayed cem trails back then!!!
Hey man, you are in late 😅😅
Circumstances :)
Very brave German pilots! 😎👍🍀💪🐺
Of all the advanced weapons Germany developed during World War II, the _Komet_ has always amazed me the most.
And most likely it was not a kill by the P38...
It was too small. Its larger replacement the Me -263 was seriously great
This is the one that melted pilots if they took off or landed the wrong way?
The rocket fuel could dissolve flesh or any other organic material it came in contact with, but I think there waa just one case in which a pilot actually died this way. Some were injured by the fuel but survived.
@@showtime112t-stof dissolved one pilot. They were very prone to explosions, the cradle could knock the plane into the ground, it could flame out on takeoff, even ekplode from rough landings.
8:22 highly maneuverable but unstable xD sure they saw for less than a second that thing .... propaganda never end .
Lord Hardthrasher just did a take down of the development of the Me-163.
His opinion of its tactical value was, let's say, negative. And hilarious.
ruclips.net/video/_cvyjm9v5WI/видео.htmlsi=YC0WW0QKyuHLGMsw
Great video! I just wish I didn't have to wait for part 2
supposedly 'game changer' :P
Wunder translated is Miracle. Ich wunder mich (I wonder if) ob es ein Wunder gescheht. (if a miracle is happening)
A wonder and a miracle are similar words. Both seem to be in use in English when people talk about 'Wunderwaffen'. Personally, I like 'wonder weapons' more.
❤❤❤
Thank you for the comment!
take this all with a huge pinch of salt
Starting with this comment :)
the acid fighter
14:06 ...🍺🍺🍺👍
Thank you!
A different breed to test one of those planes in the time off development,, big respect,,☘️☘️☘️☘️ from northern Ireland
Fortunately ,this plane was not a good dogfighter!!!. I dont know all the history about this. I know it was dangerous during a hard landing, because the methanol" was highly explosive if where présent in tanks
It was actually more dangerous on takeoff as it was full of rocket fuel. They usually landed empty. But that wasn't a walk in the park either.
@@showtime112 yes and i can add that when Komet arrive close to target too fast , only few seconds to aim and opening fire, despite of ...hit target.
30mm Guns have also à low speed of fire, and shell runs only 350 m/s.
So very difficult to do all thèse in 5 second. Job for "experten"
Wasn't designed to be a dogfighter.It was designed to hit the bombers.
3:40 - It's not "Mark 108". The "Mk" in Mk-108 stands for Maschinenkanone (Machine Cannon), just as "MG" in MG-151 stands for Maschinengewehr (Machine rifle [gun]).
Thank you, I've already been corrected for that :)
Which flight simulator is this?
War thunder
It's War Thunder. Flight simulator in a rather wide sense 😁
From these images @0:25 and following, the reproduction is wrong, the swastika is missing from the vertical tail.
It's important to avoid changing history as we see too often now...
Nevertheless, apart from a few small errors (nobody's perfect), it's a great video.
Death trap and acheived very little.
So, your video's are aviation related, but sponsored by a game with tanks?
Sponsors don't necessarily need to be a perfect match. I know a bunch of people who like both, aviation and armor. WT features both, for example.
❤
Hvala!
Great video and it is very informative. However, I advise you not to use fake "gun camera newsreel" shots, as it undermines the authenticity of what you are doing. Everybody is fake nowadays --- you should be the exception.
Thank you for the feedback. Regarding the authenticity issue, I don't see it that way. 'Fake' would be creating something which never happened and then trying to convince people that it did. The whole point of these videos is to visualize things which actually happened (or at least, which sources describe as such). One day, we should be able to create footage which will look 100% authentic. As long as you make clear they are created (and in the case of gun camera in this video, they obviously are), I don't see a problem. If I could make a video look completely like original footage, I'd do it.
@@showtime112 It's not real gun camera footage, but it is altered to look like it. You are not showing us the real event, but your reenactment of it. That is OK, but it would be better if you had said, "this is a reenactment to show what it looked like." You add to the deception by showing a pretend gun camera take without mentioning that the take isn't real either. Why?
@@Axgoodofdunemaul Because it's still pretty obvious that it's not historical footage.
Тупиковый путь развития авиации !
I do wonder who those young mechnaics were, making a bit of history that lasted to this day
Seems they should have stayed with the 20mm canons.
Development started before the war did so it wasn’t a “late war” design
If you see it that way, no design is really 'late war'. The design of every aircraft which entered service in the 1944-45 period really started much earlier.
@@showtime112 I suppose that is true, at least for aircraft
War thunder good
I think I'm in love with you.
Oh, I don't think so 🤣🤣🤣
The worst fighter aircraft ever.
Sorry. I won't watch censured video.
Go ⬆️ yourself and learn to spell censored*
@@LemonHead-sq5wswhat is even censored?
Lack of swastikas?
No way he woul keep up.
Wot and f2p game HAHA ..HAHA sorry but it was funny xD even quickybaby suffers with hes secound acc
More dangerous to pilot and crew. Did'nt acheive much.
World of trash as a sponser? So you don‘t check quality 😂
People can try it completely free and decide for themselves if they like it or not.
Rocket powered , not jet
If you are referring to descriptions by Allied pilots, they sometimes called all of them 'jets' or 'jetties' because their intel on the subject was quite limited.
@@showtime112 You did at least once as well but don’t worry , I’m just being pedantic and petty , another excellent video as usual , thanks.
USA males and their weird first names
They were definitely giving some unique names in that period 😁
The color scheme is incomplete and historically inaccurate. It's also cowardly to avoid depicting it accurately, because of the desire to please society.
Great work!
Thanks Chups!