Thank you I learned a couple things I didn't realize I could do. Unticking the remove after each stroke, with the remove too, l is going to make my life a little easier.
Yes, those were the artifacts I was talking about with the remove tool. I better make sure I do noise reduction first. Although I had an image with noise reduction and used the remove tool in a area that was a bit blurry, not in the plane of focus, and I got some artifacts. The dog has spots like the Dalmatian. So, yeah, I suppose at that point generative fill would be better? Thanks for the tips!!!
It's fine for small areas, but seeing some quality issues on larger areas, in which case I wouldn't use it for those jobs. I'm not really using it for client/commercial work at the moment anyway due to the Adobe regulations.
@@UnleashedEducation I can get by with it on image from my R6, but it looks like poo if I use it on images from my R5. The piximperfect guy has a workaround via tiling that gets better resolution out of it, but seems a lot of trouble for something I never needed before, and which will probably have priority for improvement by Adobe.
Great tips!!
Thank you I learned somes things I didn't realize I could do. :D
Thank you I learned a couple things I didn't realize I could do. Unticking the remove after each stroke, with the remove too, l is going to make my life a little easier.
Glad to hear it, anything to make your editing process quicker and easier is a good thing! 😁
Yes, those were the artifacts I was talking about with the remove tool. I better make sure I do noise reduction first. Although I had an image with noise reduction and used the remove tool in a area that was a bit blurry, not in the plane of focus, and I got some artifacts. The dog has spots like the Dalmatian. So, yeah, I suppose at that point generative fill would be better? Thanks for the tips!!!
Yeah if you find it doesn't give you a good result even with the noise reduction applied, try a different tool for sure. 👍
How are you finding the resolution limitation on generative fill?
It's fine for small areas, but seeing some quality issues on larger areas, in which case I wouldn't use it for those jobs. I'm not really using it for client/commercial work at the moment anyway due to the Adobe regulations.
@@UnleashedEducation I can get by with it on image from my R6, but it looks like poo if I use it on images from my R5. The piximperfect guy has a workaround via tiling that gets better resolution out of it, but seems a lot of trouble for something I never needed before, and which will probably have priority for improvement by Adobe.
@@daemon1143 I'm sure it will improve with time, in the meantime, agreed, I just won't use it when it looks bad!