LEGO Star Wars 75323 CAD BANE’S JUSTIFIER Review! (2022)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 окт 2024
  • Cad Bane's triumphant return to LEGO Star Wars has been thwarted by price per piece. The $170, 1022 piece Cad Bane's Justifier might be more worth the price than many want to believe. With the first Omega & Toda 360 Minifigures appearing alongside a NEW Cad Bane with returning Hunter & Fennec Shand there's something for everyone here. The ship faithfully recreated Omega's capture in The Bad Batch Season 1 however leaves a lot to be desired with interior space so tight. The rest of the ship is awesome with retractable landing gear, fun play features, and dynamic display!
    Buy the LEGO Star Wars Inquisitor Ship (Affiliate Links):
    Amazon - amzn.to/3PvWjzB
    Zavvi - tidd.ly/3KKbIcn
    LEGO - click.linksyne...
    MORE LEGO Star Wars Summer 2022 set reviews: • 2022 LEGO Star Wars Se...
    - - - - - - - - -
    Business Inquiries - mandrproductions@algebramedia.com
    Fan E-mail - MandRprod34@gmail.com
    Best of MandRproductions: • Best of MandRproductions
    - - - - - - - - -
    #LEGOStarWars #LEGO #StarWars

Комментарии • 656

  • @MandRproductions
    @MandRproductions  2 года назад +468

    Fixed it... if you know you know.

  • @Jumpyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
    @Jumpyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy 2 года назад +1971

    There's nothing justifying that price.

  • @gooselord7896
    @gooselord7896 2 года назад +681

    Hard to imagine this is $50 more than the 2019 millenium falcon which had more minifigures, full interior and is actually an iconic ship and doesn't look like a giant grey block

    • @hanteo.
      @hanteo. 2 года назад +59

      I know right. Can’t believe anyone is defending this set and its price so much. Even at the AT-TE price of 140 this set would still be a bit overpriced imo.

    • @CheeseRunner
      @CheeseRunner 2 года назад +21

      Yeah the high price would be more justified if it wasn't (in my opinion of course) one of the ugliest ships in Star Wars.

    • @LSWproductions293
      @LSWproductions293 2 года назад +9

      Hey this is still a good model

    • @master_k5019
      @master_k5019 2 года назад +4

      @@CheeseRunner no way is It the ugliest

    • @CheeseRunner
      @CheeseRunner 2 года назад +10

      @@master_k5019 THE ugliest? Probably not, there's definitely worse. One of the ugliest? Imo yes.
      A different color would've improved a lot imo as the nearly full dark grey doesn't look very good.

  • @SWTobito0702
    @SWTobito0702 2 года назад +58

    Quick tip in regards to sticker application. Instead of holding the stickers with your hands use the orange brick separator pieces. You can just slide them underneath the sticker to hold them and even use them to smooth the stickers over. I've been doing this for a long while now and my stickers have never looked better.

  • @NiqRipple
    @NiqRipple 2 года назад +217

    They could’ve included the escape pod which Omega escapes in during TBB episode 9, it would’ve been a nice side build to justify the price of a set. They even could’ve included one of those botched clone tanks with a unique mini-figure.

    • @instasingingvids3529
      @instasingingvids3529 2 года назад +7

      I was thinking of the escape pod as well. It would also be cool. To get Fennecs ship.

    • @tam2237
      @tam2237 2 года назад +5

      Nah, the tank isn’t needed nor would it really be appropriate I think but the pod would’ve been a welcome addition

    • @NiqRipple
      @NiqRipple 2 года назад +6

      @@tam2237 The tank isn’t necessary but it could’ve been an interesting side build since it would include a exclusive mini-figure.

    • @tam2237
      @tam2237 2 года назад +3

      @@NiqRipple but I think the figure wouldn’t be very appropriate, whether it’s relevant to the scene or not. Plus I think it would be kinda a useless side build as it doesn’t really have much of a use aside from shelf decoration, I think in general only the escape pod would really work as a good additional side build

    • @h24manu
      @h24manu 2 года назад

      @@tam2237 Ah so the actual side build for this Set makes more sense than a Tank? I don't even know what the fuck that shit is supposed to be

  • @keeshandave8603
    @keeshandave8603 2 года назад +251

    The Justifier looks very cool. The figures, the return of Cad Bane and the features are cool. What I don't like about it is the price. It's so expensive! Heck, the Justifier costs $210 CND in Canada. That's absurd

    • @deadbananaegg2419
      @deadbananaegg2419 2 года назад +19

      It’s 260 dollars in australia, that’s even more absurd

    • @LucasEdwards26
      @LucasEdwards26 2 года назад +12

      @@deadbananaegg2419 it’s the same value my friend

    • @i-waked-up-filthy
      @i-waked-up-filthy 2 года назад +4

      In Poland 800

    • @owoc8260
      @owoc8260 2 года назад +3

      @@i-waked-up-filthy to mamy taniej od nich więc ja się ciesze

    • @i-waked-up-filthy
      @i-waked-up-filthy 2 года назад +2

      @@owoc8260 oni mają 260 dolarów australijskich a nasza cena jest 120 wyższa bo została ustalona w szczyt dolara kiedy był równy 4.70 złotego

  • @4891LUT
    @4891LUT 2 года назад +55

    170 is still way too expensive for what you get. Theres barely any worthwhile features and the minifig selection is also quite lacking. Sure the thing is large but there is really not a lot to do for a set this size.

    • @mathewcurtis8484
      @mathewcurtis8484 2 года назад +8

      Ikr $30 more and you can just buy a UCS set

    • @lmojol9673
      @lmojol9673 2 года назад +2

      Exactly. It’s a cool set, just not $170 cool.

    • @paoloignacio1211
      @paoloignacio1211 2 года назад +1

      @@mathewcurtis8484 the UCS landspeeder sucks lol. Would rather get the justifier and the $30 Obi wan starfighter

    • @mathewcurtis8484
      @mathewcurtis8484 2 года назад +2

      @@paoloignacio1211 well I wasn’t specifically talking about the landspeeder, but yeah I agree

    • @Paxton365
      @Paxton365 2 года назад

      ​@@mathewcurtis8484 Eh there is not very good selection for 200$ Star Wars UCS sets at the moment.

  • @TheWhiteWolf6911
    @TheWhiteWolf6911 2 года назад +64

    I think two major issues could have been fixed easily. One; the "hammer" mechanism exposed, which looks as though could be built over without interrupting the mechanics underneath. Two; those worthless wing panels, frankly shouldn't be there since their ONLY function is to hide the extra blasts for the shooter, could have been one connected piece or latched differently for sure.

  • @florian6259
    @florian6259 2 года назад +83

    Am I the only one feeling like there is a lot of places where it looks "not finished" ? Like a lot of things we shouldn't see easily are VERY visible. Is it just me ?

    • @IntergalacticBricks
      @IntergalacticBricks 2 года назад +7

      Not just you, I feel the same

    • @florian6259
      @florian6259 2 года назад +3

      @@IntergalacticBricks I'm almost feeling the same when I look at a custom sets with design flaws you know ?

    • @IntergalacticBricks
      @IntergalacticBricks 2 года назад +1

      @@florian6259 yeah

    • @hyperion2551
      @hyperion2551 2 года назад +1

      yeah for some reason it feels like a custom set.

    • @tsmmegalodon3892
      @tsmmegalodon3892 2 года назад +1

      I agree just got the set and it could use a good amount of pieces

  • @protion_2312
    @protion_2312 2 года назад +34

    I would love a comparation between this one and the custom one you got

    • @okieg8960
      @okieg8960 Год назад +1

      It’s way bigger and less detailed and almost double the price

  • @octavianschaefer7294
    @octavianschaefer7294 2 года назад +28

    Kinda bothers me that the technic functions are so visible, for $170, I’d at least expect a Lego ship to look somewhat realistic to its lore.

  • @viperson9818
    @viperson9818 2 года назад +139

    It's not a bad set but for only 4.5 figures I expect more for that $170 price point for star wars.

    • @snapjaw7578
      @snapjaw7578 2 года назад +5

      I mean the AT TE is 40 dollars cheaper and has 5 figures plus 3 battle droids, and the inquisitors transport scythe has the exact same amount of figures. So completely lacking in mini figures.

    • @samphonemorton6291
      @samphonemorton6291 2 года назад

      Yeah a kaminoan or two would have been nice

    • @h24manu
      @h24manu 2 года назад

      @@snapjaw7578 also lacking the amount of downside panels

    • @forkliftcertifiedguy7
      @forkliftcertifiedguy7 Год назад

      @@snapjaw7578 and a dwarf spider droid, so that’d be 9 Minifigures for the AT-TE

    • @misosupe
      @misosupe Год назад

      dsds are not minifigs

  • @joshlombardo3673
    @joshlombardo3673 2 года назад +24

    I love how the millennium falcon is 130 dollars and this grey block is 170! With the lack of interior I think it should retail closer to 100.

    • @kodyshaw6991
      @kodyshaw6991 2 года назад +1

      The Falcon was originally 160$, which adjusted for inflation equals about 185$ today. The only reason the Falcon is at such a discount is because it's a sequel variant; the sequels sets did not sell well.
      The Justifier really isn't that bad considering it's sheer size. It's a bummer the interior is so small, but the ship is still a pretty faithful recreation of what we see in the show.

    • @h24manu
      @h24manu 2 года назад

      @@kodyshaw6991 Yes I remember how small the lower part of the hammer is and loved to see Cad Banes appreciation of the color yellow

    • @kodyshaw6991
      @kodyshaw6991 2 года назад

      @@h24manu Exactly

    • @h24manu
      @h24manu 2 года назад

      @@kodyshaw6991 Was that Irony?

    • @kodyshaw6991
      @kodyshaw6991 2 года назад

      @@h24manu Was that sarcasm?

  • @michaelt3172
    @michaelt3172 2 года назад +32

    I don’t care about the price per piece I still think it’s too expensive. Should be $150 if anything

    • @h24manu
      @h24manu 2 года назад

      130$ not more

  • @theGreenGoose
    @theGreenGoose Год назад +26

    I just can't justifiably justify the unjust price of this justifier

  • @Se-du7sh
    @Se-du7sh 2 года назад +15

    Even if the set is bigger, it doesn't justify the price. If I mad a square box out of tiles and bricks with less pieces but it was still bigger, would you pay more?

    • @hyperion2551
      @hyperion2551 2 года назад +2

      yeah its just an ugly set with not enough minifigures

    • @Se-du7sh
      @Se-du7sh 2 года назад +1

      @@hyperion2551 Finally someone else who sees it!

  • @NovacaineRebelxx
    @NovacaineRebelxx 2 года назад +10

    Honestly I didn’t think I was gonna like this set too much, especially with it being at that high price point, but this ship looks incredible. I just wish there was a little bit more interior room, but the exterior detail they put into this set more than *justifies* the price for me personally.

  • @Bojko77
    @Bojko77 Год назад +3

    I didn't buy this spaceship even when it was at 100$, I saw too many negatives, but in the end I bought it on eBay for 75$ with shipping, but no figures, arrived today, assembled, as described, the man took out the figures, everything perfect closed in the box again. In short very satisfied, I'm sure this set will go sky high with the price when it is withdrawn. The ship looks great, with the Scythe 75336 there are beauties on the shelf, live it looks Top, I love it. In my opinion, buy it on sale, you won't go wrong, it has a special look, my recommendation.

  • @chelbel0624
    @chelbel0624 2 года назад +12

    The back thruster mechanism seems a lot more complicated that it needs to be. But it does look kind of heavy

  • @Helycon
    @Helycon Год назад +7

    With how big it is it feels like it needs a carry handle and with the price it feels like it should have a fleshed out interior like the millennium falcon, especially considering the pricing on the past play-sized millennium falcons being at the same or a lower price tier

  • @mattwolfers6594
    @mattwolfers6594 2 года назад +12

    Honestly I want this set now.
    I didn't at first cause of the fact that it's very expensive, but honestly it looks worth the price to me
    Plus, I really want a cad bane minifigure so I might as well get his ship too

    • @Heiligesbrot1
      @Heiligesbrot1 2 года назад +2

      No I think you just want a cad bane minifig look again this ship is very unfinished.

  • @J-quaza
    @J-quaza 2 года назад +16

    I would like to say thank you, thank you for being an awesome lego star wars channel, and it was you who got me back into lego, specially lego star wars, I love what you do and keep doing it

  • @KillaP4ND47
    @KillaP4ND47 2 года назад +7

    I always look at the weight of the set compared to its price, instead of looking at price per piece.

  • @connorschaffner5295
    @connorschaffner5295 2 года назад +3

    This review is needed for everyone saying it’s overpriced as it shows the size a lot more

  • @skullraiser1665
    @skullraiser1665 Год назад +10

    Got this for 84 bucks at Walmart on clearance. Should be a fun set to build besides the small amount of interior to it. The Justifier itself looks nice on the outside with cool minifigures

    • @ShizzySupra
      @ShizzySupra Год назад +3

      I just snagged it today for $85 at Wal Mart. Stoked for it

  • @404thtrooper
    @404thtrooper 2 года назад +5

    Cad Bane's ventilator piece is pretty sweet. Ship looks pretty big, I like the technic use

  • @chrishayes4323
    @chrishayes4323 2 года назад +8

    I agree that the previous Cad Bane's hat was ridiculously large, but I probably won't buy this just to replace the hat that came with Cad Banes' Speeder. I already have Hunter and Fennec Shand from other sets, and I've had a counterfeit Omega for some time, who looks pretty much the same as this official one, except for the arm printing. She also came with that bow weapon she had in the Bad Batch. Thanks for showing that the interior wasn't really anything special. I don't have room for another huge ship (or most of the sets I already own, actually), so I'll save my 170 bucks for something else. Like paying rent and buying groceries.

    • @GassedFEIN
      @GassedFEIN 2 года назад +2

      Just buy the cad bane online that’s what im gonna do

  • @MNewsTime
    @MNewsTime 2 года назад +11

    Here’s why it’s still over priced : yes it’s large, but it has only 2 play features. Shouldn’t be more than 120 in my opinion . I wouldn’t pay anymore than that, unless I need ALL the figs. Then it’s maybe justified at 140-150.
    Two play features - stud shooters and omegas cell. The landing hammer is not a play feature

    • @derekpowers5585
      @derekpowers5585 2 года назад +5

      Yeah, it doesn’t make sense when Razor Crest is $120. They know people will pay the price to get Cad Bane and to a lesser extent Omega. I’m glad I have no interest in Bad Batch or any want or need for Cad Bane.

  • @gamingmonkey8184
    @gamingmonkey8184 2 года назад +3

    It sucks that it’s 170$ it sounding be 170$ it should be around 120$-130$

  • @thatlegoguy518
    @thatlegoguy518 2 года назад +3

    It’s not at a very justifiable price

  • @coleslogic
    @coleslogic Год назад +4

    Should I get it for $120?

  • @joshuabrickman1641
    @joshuabrickman1641 2 года назад +55

    Thanks for the review on this set. Really thought it was over priced until seeing the actual size compared to some of the other sets. Went from a no to a yes purchase. thanks for the great content.

    • @brogleg
      @brogleg 2 года назад +6

      yeah the absolute size of this set is insane, lego could have easily made it 100-130 usd but they made it giant

    • @Bleakmidwntr850
      @Bleakmidwntr850 2 года назад +1

      Want it but with the atte being only 140 I can’t say I need both,but will be brick linking the figs from this set

    • @mortalwound2945
      @mortalwound2945 2 года назад +2

      @@brogleg Giant waste of space no interior or features that make it worth it. You are paying for a large ugly ship with just a cockpit.

    • @brogleg
      @brogleg 2 года назад

      @@mortalwound2945 Doesn't mean I cant like the design

    • @mortalwound2945
      @mortalwound2945 2 года назад

      @@brogleg The ship overall design is solid like a mean first order shuttle. But the build just isn't good and the looks don't translate well to lego.

  • @Sean_Officiall1
    @Sean_Officiall1 2 года назад +12

    I do like the justifier but it's just way to over priced, especially when this would have cost lego about $20 tops to make, I'm still not sure if it's worth it

    • @joshuamueller3206
      @joshuamueller3206 2 года назад +1

      Okay, plastic is cheap, but it costs money to run a business. You have to make the pieces, keep tooling current, pay employees, advertise, pay income and property taxes (does Europe have a carbon tax?), property maintenance, and literally pay to keep the lights on. All that cost is added on to the sets.

    • @distantnemesis1593
      @distantnemesis1593 2 года назад +4

      @@joshuamueller3206 lego is making record profits right now, and they are still bumping up prices even more

    • @joshuamueller3206
      @joshuamueller3206 2 года назад +1

      @@distantnemesis1593 Was just trying to say it cost more than $20 to make.

    • @distantnemesis1593
      @distantnemesis1593 2 года назад +1

      @@joshuamueller3206 that’s fair

    • @Sean_Officiall1
      @Sean_Officiall1 2 года назад +1

      @@joshuamueller3206 it all depends on what set it is, one of the reasons lego costs so much is because they use boxes that are too big, and that makes shipping prices more, and like you said taxes etc.

  • @robbiemac13
    @robbiemac13 Год назад +2

    I am the biggest “torch and pitchfork in-hand” denouncer of recent LEGO with their complete BS price hike (gouge) of late but this, really after building it… is amazing.

  • @legoforestmen3234
    @legoforestmen3234 2 года назад +5

    Great set! I like the features, and the look, and the figures! If they would just have replaced the stickers with a printed windshield piece at the front, and bring the price down to $140, it'd be great!

  • @jotay1337
    @jotay1337 6 месяцев назад

    Im happy that I was able to get this set new from my local Bricks & Minifigs for $130.

  • @David-or7zn
    @David-or7zn 2 года назад +1

    A few weeks ago I watched a video that showed a few building techniques and someone in the comments said that the front of the tail of the Justifier isn’t an illegal building technique, since the 45 degrees panels are smaller then normall panels.

  • @tam2237
    @tam2237 2 года назад +3

    I really really really want this set but unfortunately unless it was like 20-30 dollars cheaper I won’t be getting it, as I can’t justify the quantity of stuff for nearly 200 dollars :/

  • @glassjar7814
    @glassjar7814 2 года назад +1

    New cad bane piece is really clean looking.

  • @paulhawkins1514
    @paulhawkins1514 2 года назад +3

    For me, part to piece only counts in terms of how long it takes to build. That’s a big part of the enjoyment and value of a set for me, and if I’m paying $170 for a set I’d want it to take a couple of evenings to build, at least. When the piece count is as low as it is in this set, I can imagine building it in one evening, which really doesn’t make it seem worth it to me. Although the main reasons I’m not getting it is the size, my lack of space, and my lack of interest in the look of it and the subject matter. It’s not iconic enough to me for that price range

  • @myregion
    @myregion 2 года назад +11

    Didn’t LEGO claim they named the “Slave I”, “Bobas Fett’s Starship” because kids may not know the name of his ship? If that’s the case, how come this is called “The Justifier” when I as a massive Star Wars fan had never even heard of this ship?

    • @callumpears1523
      @callumpears1523 2 года назад +7

      LEGO never claimed that. Some fans who didn't believe in the controversy said it as an excuse but the LEGO designers themselves confirmed it was Disney who asked them to change the name.

    • @CheeseRunner
      @CheeseRunner 2 года назад +3

      It's definitely the case with a lot of sets in Lego Star Wars.
      However with the whole "Boba's starship" drama, this was not the case. They just didn't want to use the word "slave" on a set mainly targeted for younger fans.
      Which is completely fine, honestly don't get why people got their panties in a twist over it. It's still canonically named The Slave-1, just not the box.

  • @thatsruffdog
    @thatsruffdog 2 года назад +2

    I find this to be fairly priced because I think it looks largely sized and fits the price. Maybe $150 would be fair but we have the price increase so that’s why it’s $170.

  • @alexandergames6
    @alexandergames6 2 года назад +1

    So that “illegal building technique” on the engine isn’t actually illegal because they are tiles not plates and it doesn’t cause stress to the lego parts

  • @omalleycaboose5937
    @omalleycaboose5937 2 года назад +13

    gonna be honest, I love Cad Bane but ship never had a memorable design for me.

  • @dr.kokiri7013
    @dr.kokiri7013 2 года назад

    Ryan: "There certainly not gonna watch themselves"
    People otherwise: they certainly are going to watch themselves

  • @mynala110
    @mynala110 2 года назад +4

    $170 set. 2 square inches of interior. Yeah….makes sense.

  • @Wtf5515
    @Wtf5515 2 года назад +2

    Can you compare it to the 2019 millennium falcon since they had the same original price

  • @FrighteningScares
    @FrighteningScares 2 года назад +2

    Ok so 1022 pieces means this set should be 120 dollars plus inflation making to 130. 170 dollars is ludicrous considering the piece count. Yes peace count doesn't always matter because it's just not going to be something that matters all of the time but with inflation that's going to bring the cost up about 10 bucks meaning that there should be about a 100 piece difference from what the set should normally have. Just because of inflation doesn't mean that there should be a 600 piece difference that is ridiculous there should only be around a 100 to 200 piece difference, prove me wrong.

  • @WhiffTheRubbishEngine1869
    @WhiffTheRubbishEngine1869 4 месяца назад

    I have this set and I will definitely say, it‘s awesome, I don’t think the price was fair but we can’t change that, it‘s awesome to display next to other large sets and the figs were very solid

  • @kylerhuels05
    @kylerhuels05 2 года назад +2

    definitely waiting for discounts on this one as much as i love the figs

  • @tipoJip
    @tipoJip 2 года назад +1

    ain't it funny that he sometimes forgets to say 'Omigah' instead of Omega xD

  • @alexr1214
    @alexr1214 2 года назад +1

    Im sure that the briefcase is the one for the credits when Bane and Shand fight for the payment on kamino

  • @claytonuptmore788
    @claytonuptmore788 9 месяцев назад

    So I got this for Christmas. My dad snagged it for 100. It is ugly as all hell yes, but luckily I bought a massive Lego piece haul and I've been fixing this set. I'm very happy with the results of my work. Makes the set worth it for me.

  • @Zac22164
    @Zac22164 2 года назад +2

    What is your least favorite 2022 summer not including the 4+ set

  • @geoffreygill5849
    @geoffreygill5849 2 года назад +1

    An idea:
    People don’t care ab price per peace in the sense that we ought to look for, say, 10c a piece bc that’s fair!! We care about it because each piece represents a single step in the build, the more pieces for the cheaper price, the more you get out of your BUILDING experience. And I personally value this price corresponding to say, a $120 lego set in terms of building experience/cost for SW, not $170. It’s a straw man about why price per piece matters, ofc bigger pieces use more plastic = bigger price

  • @mechakingghidorha9776
    @mechakingghidorha9776 2 года назад +1

    If those are tiles in between the studs it is not an illegal technique, at least that was what I was told.

  • @thebossoftoys
    @thebossoftoys 2 года назад +3

    I think its overpriced for a 170 I would like a bigger interior but I'll probably get it for 20% of at Amazon so that should work itself out however I'm just incredibly hyped for the atte

  • @nxcrobutcher
    @nxcrobutcher 2 года назад +1

    i still bought this even if its a little overpriced, cad bane is my favourite character and his minifig is amazing, i guess the ship is cool too

  • @ZackMuffinMan
    @ZackMuffinMan 2 года назад +1

    It's a bit expensive but I think I'll still get it eventually.

  • @kingjonny394
    @kingjonny394 2 года назад +1

    i've got 40 pounds of vip points to spend, so i can get this for an actually reasonable price, best set of the wave imo

  • @potatohead826
    @potatohead826 Год назад +1

    Imo, the sheer size of this does help the price a tiny bit

  • @zenronez1158
    @zenronez1158 2 года назад +1

    I like to think the high price of set is because of Cad Bane.
    He probably demanded a high price for his inclusion since the majority agree he is the best bounty hunter.
    Maybe Toto tax who knows.
    Once by one clone the rest are easy.

  • @AshMCM
    @AshMCM Год назад +1

    I need this and the inquisitor scythe

  • @american6437
    @american6437 2 года назад +2

    I watched the old video and didn’t see anything wrong if anybody knows what happened please let me know

    • @joshpalmquist492
      @joshpalmquist492 2 года назад +1

      10:30 he discovers a feature with the jail cell.

  • @legomattie3295
    @legomattie3295 2 года назад +1

    180 euros in the netherlands, which i dont get. It is too much, even for that size. At least lego should have cover up the tail mechanism. Now you see through the ship. This is not the case on the tv show.

  • @iancaldwell4721
    @iancaldwell4721 2 года назад +1

    Mans when he sees one stud misaligned by a milla meter :😤

  • @doufmech4323
    @doufmech4323 2 года назад

    Yesterday I was able to get the 75337 AT-TE for $131, very happy with my purchase.

  • @dr_kopic
    @dr_kopic 2 года назад +12

    Yeah in my opinion the ship is EXTREMELY lacking on the interior and, tbh the only reason I’d get it is for the figures but, sadly the justifier is not justified for the so called justified price by Lego, especially after their $10 price increase which is supposedly justified, but the price was already not justified…..

  • @capybara2671
    @capybara2671 2 года назад

    You say the video's won't watch themselves yet I've woken up to notice being several videos deep.

  • @masxalis6978
    @masxalis6978 Год назад

    In Greece it's relatively cheap. It only costs 135€, which for what you are getting, isn't a lot

  • @Theprophet3928
    @Theprophet3928 2 года назад +1

    Oh my god it has Todo!!! 😃

  • @collinmordecai7178
    @collinmordecai7178 2 года назад +1

    I think the mid legs is for characters that are at the ages 14 and above. Omega has the appearance of a 12 year old although not sure about her actual age as the show portrays that she is much older. Close to Boba. I think she is consistent with the new legs. But season 2 may need the mid legs.

    • @nxcrobutcher
      @nxcrobutcher 2 года назад +1

      i'm pretty sure she was created during the first wave of clones in 32 bby so she should be 13 during bad batch

  • @blop6817
    @blop6817 2 года назад +5

    This feels just like the imperial light cruiser from last year, cool concept, great figs, bad excecution, to little interior space, missed oppertunities and extremely overpriced
    Cmon lego why you have to do us like this

  • @admiralfurret
    @admiralfurret 2 года назад

    Im gonna grab it if someone sells it without the minifigs, because its 3x cheaper and the ship can be fixed

  • @Keolas_multiverse
    @Keolas_multiverse Год назад

    Just got this set for $120 on offer up from my local lego hook up couldn't be more happy with the deal.

  • @VELOCITY_OF_BRICKS
    @VELOCITY_OF_BRICKS 7 месяцев назад +1

    you justified the justifier's price

  • @samuelthygerson6009
    @samuelthygerson6009 Год назад

    If any kid gets a 170 dollar set for their birthday, that kid is super lucky

  • @AshMCM
    @AshMCM 11 месяцев назад

    I want this to be a custom freighter for a custom character of mine, I think I’m gonna remove the back part. I’ll see when I get mine.

  • @i-muts
    @i-muts 2 года назад

    That engine building technique isn't illegal since it's with tiles. Doing that with plates is illegal

  • @glassjar7814
    @glassjar7814 Год назад

    Came back to this video to see if I missed something cause this set is sold out at almost every store I’ve been too recently

  • @theflamingcookie6480
    @theflamingcookie6480 2 года назад +2

    hey I've seen this one
    what do you mean? its brand new!

  • @shanenonwolfe4109
    @shanenonwolfe4109 2 года назад

    If you look on ebay rn you can find it for like 130 to 140 which is pretty good

  • @iamjoshuaiam
    @iamjoshuaiam 2 года назад

    Ryan is pulling out some hilarious one liners lately. 😂

  • @Deathtrooper9
    @Deathtrooper9 2 года назад +1

    set name: the justifier
    price: not justified
    me: ironic

  • @jasonruston3315
    @jasonruston3315 2 года назад

    Just got this on sale for £90 in the UK at 3 stores , guys wait it'll come down

  • @DamianDillard10
    @DamianDillard10 Год назад

    Looking back this is a fair price. Love this set. Very underrated. I feel it is just impossible to get a full interior on this though

  • @aeroallergen
    @aeroallergen 2 года назад

    I've been saying this is a chad version of Sanctuary II and I intend to keep doing so.

  • @rogerjohnson8035
    @rogerjohnson8035 2 года назад

    Lmao when he said "OMEEEGA"

  • @jerepitkanen5496
    @jerepitkanen5496 2 года назад

    This set is the higligth of summer 2022 to me. I think it's really great. Btw you ar awesome!💙

  • @brandonnn9543
    @brandonnn9543 2 года назад +2

    The price is too high. Should be $160. Also missing 2 minifigures, cad bane has no arm printing which is a MASSIVE disappointment. Besides that not a bad set but I think we can all agree that this should have been a gunship with captain Rex.

    • @callumpears1523
      @callumpears1523 2 года назад +1

      It's crazy that Bane has no arm printing but Omega does.

    • @johnl577
      @johnl577 2 года назад +1

      @@callumpears1523 yea why do they keep skimping out on these popular characters, old visor for Cody, no arm printing for cad bane, what’s next?

  • @jaycodlin1429
    @jaycodlin1429 8 месяцев назад

    I picked it up brand new in Australia from target last week for $120 AUD 🎉😊

  • @Westoby45
    @Westoby45 Год назад +1

    I found this set for 100 at Barnes and noble and thought it was to expensive 😂

    • @wyattstudios21
      @wyattstudios21 Год назад +2

      I hate it when things are ”to” expensive

  • @popcornvader2145
    @popcornvader2145 2 года назад +5

    I really think it’s a cool set, but unfortunately I’m saving for other sets and I still don’t think that $170 will do it for me. I’ll just hope the Cad Bane mini fig is affordable on bricklink or eBay when released

    • @jaydonmagan4694
      @jaydonmagan4694 2 года назад

      I’d say to see if you can get this set cheaper on eBay, or waiting for this to go on clearance.
      I only say this because I am certain this new Cad Band figure is gonna cost around $20 on eBay or BrickLink. And eBay does sell some newer, in stock sets at a cheaper price than their store price. I found someone selling the Giganotosaurus vs Therizinosaurus set for about $108, which is much more reasonable than $130.

    • @chrishayes4323
      @chrishayes4323 2 года назад

      @@jaydonmagan4694 20 bucks for the figure is better than 170 for the Justifier, if the figure is what really interests you.

    • @jaydonmagan4694
      @jaydonmagan4694 2 года назад

      @@chrishayes4323 That’s gonna come down to personal opinion.
      If it was $20 with inflation, I’d be fine with it. But a figure costing $20 on eBay when it’s just released does not feel worth it to me. I’d rather try and find a cheaper price for the set first, cause it is a good looking set, in my opinion, and while Cad Bane is the biggest draw for a lot of people, I like getting my money’s worth out of something. $170 is too much for the set, but Cad Bane starting out at $20 is also too much, in my opinion. I like to find the middle ground where I get the best option.

    • @Paxton365
      @Paxton365 2 года назад

      @@jaydonmagan4694 Shipping screws me over on eBay. That's why I barely shop on the site anymore. (I live in Canada.)

    • @jaydonmagan4694
      @jaydonmagan4694 2 года назад

      @@Paxton365 Shipping screws you as in it doesn’t get to you, or that you have to pay for shipping?

  • @HoboJoe11
    @HoboJoe11 Год назад

    It’s not illegal. The only reason why it’s illegal is because TILES are to big and they put tension on the pieces but tiles are built small enough to fit and that can actually fit so perfectly they can slide between the studs

  • @LegallyBlindBrick
    @LegallyBlindBrick Год назад

    Techinichly speaking it dose not damage the pieces if it is a tile unlike a plate

  • @Doggo_01
    @Doggo_01 2 года назад +2

    $130. Take it or leave it.

  • @transformers4089
    @transformers4089 2 года назад

    I kid you not, I saw this set at meijer a couple of days ago, two of them, so hopefully I can find that at-te set soon too.

  • @ATI_117
    @ATI_117 Год назад

    Saw this at target yesterday and trip out how big was the box

  • @Yung-plague
    @Yung-plague 2 года назад

    9:45 my brother in Christ, you smacked the face of the ship against the table only 30 seconds ago 😂😂 I heard the pieces launch around when you did it lmao
    Loving your vids though, just got back into Star Wars lego as an adult this year, been buying and building sets with my baby sister

  • @hydraulicecstasy8514
    @hydraulicecstasy8514 2 года назад

    Good video! Glad the jail cell wasn't as hard to open as previously thought, even if it is tight haha