Kyle Rittenhouse Case Analysis | Self-Defense or Murder?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 ноя 2021
- This video answers the question: Can I analyze the case of Kyle Rittenhouse?
Support Dr. Grande on Patreon: / drgrande
Subscribe to the Bella Grande Media Podcast: / @bellagrandemedia
Dr. Grande’s book Harm Reduction:
www.amazon.com/Harm-Reduction...
Dr. Grande's book Psychology of Notorious Serial Killers: www.amazon.com/Psychology-Not...
Check out Dr. Grande’s merchandise at: teespring.com/stores/dr-grand...
References:
www.nytimes.com/article/kyle-...
www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...
www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/...
“When politics enter the room logic tends to stand up and leave the room” 100% accurate
Yeap, loved that quote
100% inaccurate, since a room is a Political construct as are all human actions, especially thinking!
@@blombidobadila8084 Exactly!
The truthest truth.
The day we start favoring psychotic convicted pedoophi1es over our political opponents is the day we are finished as a functioning society.
Another thing to learn here is: politicians will often use a tragedy like this to push their political agenda.
Politicians created this tragedy for their own political agenda.
@@relacser they're also the same ones trying to make this a left vs right issue. Many on the left want this to be a warning to not interfere when their thugs are terrorizing the neighborhood.
Meanwhile the right is a boogieman to make it sound political.
@@SlyNine 100% agreed.
They most likely sent rioters outside of the courthouse to pressure the jury to give a guilty verdict even though they know Rittenhouse is innocent. The jury will read a guilty verdict to save their own asses. The national guard is outside the courthouse as well on stand by. But the jury are feeling the pressure to say guilty even though they know he is justified in shooting the attackers. The jury will throw Rittenhouse under the bus to save their asses and most of the country.
@@Johnclark300 what are you talking about? There aren’t any “rioters” outside of the courthouse. In fact, there have been multiple reports about how few people there have been protesting or “rioting” as you say outside of the courthouse.
The guilty person is the governor who did not call in the National Guard and let the riots continue for 3 nights destroying downtown Kenosha.
Best comment
@Na'keem Syko google the statements by Gov Evers and Lt Gov Barnes. Not only did these idiots not send sufficient protection, **they made the problem worse** by spouting race-hate statements before all the facts were in. Heck Lt Gov Barnes even pushed the lie that Blake "was trying to break up a fight"
The mayor of Kenosha told police to stand down. Another alt left winger democrat destroying a city, to divide our nation.
What about the rehab center that released Rosenbaum? That was negligent.
No, no, Dr. Grande said they were just cutting loose & setting some things on fire!
I even heard a cop on the news say “ peaceful protest “ yet even before rittenhouse entered the area, there were lootings and fires
There can be a relatively successfully peaceful protest, while in one area people who are not peacefully protesting can act on their own. It doesn't mean the main body of protesters are acting violently. lived through all the 1960s "riots' and protests. Most protests go like this: A main body of peaceful protesters exists. As well, a few angry people act out in some other manner. The result is the media and people who disagree with the protesters paint the entire protest as having been a non-peaceful or "violent" protest. As well, lighting something on fire doesn't make a protest "violent". If the main body of a protest is causing actual violence to property, not just a dumpster (and it's the main body of protest), then you could legitimately say the protest was a violent one. If a cop says it was a peaceful protest it was because the cop overseeing or seeing the main protest saw just that....a peaceful protest. Then, in another area of town or of the area a few other people were doing bad things...it doesn't or shouldn't mark the protest as being not peaceful.
@33ForestAve was that what happened?
@@dougdoesall have you ever been in a public school?
@@chandlerbland29 I attended 12 years of public schools. I walked and road great distances, as we did back then, to school. I went to a half n half black/white public high school during the so-called "race riots" of the 60s. We had protests in front of the high school. I've seen a hundred times what we see today, just not the mass school shootings done by right wing children of gun lovers. We didn't have those. That would've never been a thought in anyone's head. It's something put into kids' heads today by their right wing gun loving parents: carry that gun and shoot. What's your point?
@@dougdoesall So true !
One of the best comments about Rittenhouse: “Never chase a man with a gun, you might catch him.”
@@1957bullshit Headass. He is talking about the rioters who chased the kid.
Real talk.
It’s like those “suicide by police”
@@gunnertlc7728 LOL 'headass' like it
I'd like to commend Rittenhause's marksmanship. Among all of the "peaceful protestors" there, Rittenhause managed to take out the only two criminals there.
In Starbucks I ordered a Dr Grande. The clerk gave it to me but only if I promised not to diagnose anyone….
I would've asked if they'd like to be analyzed via OCEAN...
LOL That joke was terrible in the best way possible 😂
only speculating what _could_ be in this cup similar to other coffees like this.
letting OCEAN score determine your Starbucks order sounds like a Buzzfeed quiz no one has time for
HEY-O! LOL
i'm a liberal and even i have such a hard time grasping how people genuinely believe the left's narrative on this.
We believe the left’s narrative because we saw in plain view that in most cases when a black man kills or gets killed his entire past is allowed to be mentioned in court as a determining factor. We know that Trayvon Martin smoked weed hours before his encounter Zimmerman, we know George Floyd’s entire criminal history, Michel Brown robbing the store was able to be used as evidence. In this case they weren’t even allowed to mention that he illegally crossed state lines with a firearm as a minor. They weren’t allowed to show the video of Rittenhouse the night before the murders saying he wished he had his gun that night so he could kill rioters. For some strange reason they allowed this case to only be about the 30 seconds when he shot people.
@@tubafats100 All that wouldn't have made a difference in the case, the outcome would have been the same. Rightfully so.
@@emmanuelgathara696 yes it would’ve made a big difference. All evidence makes a difference. They weren’t able to mention his intention even though his intentions were obvious.
@@tubafats100 Watch the videos please. Klye had every right to shot those nut jobs who were threatening him. Plus let's look at everyone's entire past, not only Kylie's Let's look at the fact that everyone one of those people who attacked him had a criminal record. Let's look at that backstory as well. Or you're just interested in Kyle being found guilty and you're not bringing everyone's past into this case?
@@tubafats100 Plus there is zero evidence to show he crossed state lines with a gun. Again, please watch the trial , you can't trust MSM with this. You sound like you're coming from a very misinformed background tbh
If you're trying to burn down a property with people in it, that's not just arson.
This whole trial is political, and that can't be denied.
I think the charges were totally political as well as the prosecution. The judge has been startlingly fair which surprises me to no end. I’m hopeful that the jury is just as fair.
@@kathlynterry8196 The judge has acted like a petulant child, screaming in a courtroom is not the norm, even when admonishing poor acts from lawyers. He feels fair to you because you're on the right and he is sating your desire to belittle arrogant, foolish, unscrupulous people on the left. Which is understandable, but he is demonstrably biased. Although I suppose "fair" doesn't necessarily translate to unbiased and that was presumptuous on my part. You will notice if you start looking into it the U.S criminal justice system is remarkably slanted to the right, at every level. Save for the occasionally balanced Supreme Court.
@UCohqUczpzEFDUPQFLOAu_rA Absolutely not.
It is made political by both right and left wing parties. Moderate people just see this case as a prime example of idiots from those two extremes killing each other and exactly that is what happened. Kyle is an idiot child who criminally obtained a rifle and put himself into a stupid situation he only got out by killing several people. Was it self-defense? Maybe. Was Rosenbaum an instigator? Definitely. Where the other killings justified? Maybe.
Point is: play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
@@tobiasmaile5919 “play stupid games, win stupid prizes” kinda like running after and attempting to assault someone that has a gun?
"When politics enters the room, logic stands up & leaves." Never truer words said, doc 👏 ❤
Treason is not politics. The right quit on the bill of rights and America a long time ago.
Between being in bed with Russia to trying to overthrow the government to saying elections are rigged it's outrageous.
Every Trump voter should be executed to save humanity
@@thebeasters and everyone with a view point like that needs to educate themselves. for example russiagate has been totally debunked and people are being indicted including Hillary Clinton lawyer.
you are a slave to msm nothing more
100% agree
@@stephenglover8828 Not at all debunked. You should live by your own rules. I think the above statement is is to extreme on how to deal with the problems. However Trump did try to overthrow the election and the democracy. Basically everyone around Trump has been prosecuted. And for a reason. Read moderates news instead so you bias doesn’t become too extreme. When people want a strong leader is an authoritarian leader. This is not in the scope of democracy and freedom. Undermining democracy, the free press and rule of law is very serious. It means they are lying to their voters and feed them propaganda instead of factual information. Today extremism is normalize daily that’s dangerous.
@@KAB7020 of course it's been debunked Clinton lawyer has been indicted, 4 years of lies. all spread by MSNBC
I thought I was going to hate this video. Well, I got my eyes opened. I wanted Rittenhouse to be found guilty. Now I see the other side. Thnk you.
On what accounts? Last I checked defending one's community is what people are supposed to do when a group of raving terrorists show up with the intent to destroy property
Respect!
@@LIBERTYSINCURSION opinions changing with the speed of light, once who called you a conspiracy theorist now knocking at insanity door with the scream “open it”. All labels dropping down liberal blue red white black as well as Inoculated sheep.
Pay close attention, Sheila, and discern wisely when you watch the mainstream news. Their goal is to divide and weaken our nation. Is it perfect? Of course not. Perhaps it will never be; but we have come so far. Thank You, for taking the time and for your thoughtfulness to comment truthfully. America may not be perfect but it is a great nation. Don't allow those far left hate mongers to divide us.
@Rob B Yes, I wholeheartedly agree. God bless this lady. And thank you Dr Grande. I do not always agree with your analysis; but on this one, I must say, you truly surprised me.
You bring a touch of sanity and reason, Dr. Grande, to this emotionally charged escapade.
“When Politics enter the room, Logic typically stands up and leaves.”
When politics enters the room, those holding the majority bias will win.
The same comment is literally above yours
I have seen a couple videos where this guy let his political standing clear and he is a democrat liberal lefty. He is very anti Trump too.
@Nathanael McCooeye don’t take this the wrong way because it’s just a compliment but you are very beautiful!
@@percaholic6939 Didn’t see it on my phone. Thought it was a great quote anyhow!
The prosecutor lost me when he fell back on misconduct, videogames, and deliberate mischaracterization of firearms.
It was a political kabuki show to placate the far left radicals. Everyone knew he was getting off the whole time.
The prosecutor is guilty of misconduct and should face legal consequences.
Hey let’s not make it political but ma boy is free ✌️💪
@@sandstone_joe5118 Effin A my friend
@@maggiewillowstine3353 They deliberately manipulated evidence. There should be an investigation and I am confident if they go forward that the prosecutor would be disbarred.
Moral of the story:
Don't go looking for trouble, because you will find it, and the trouble you find will probably be more than the trouble you were looking for.
The trouble was happening already before he went up there. He is a free American and his constitutional rights allowed him to be there with his rifle. He was perfectly within his rights not unlike the rioters until they broke the law, stupid.
Yep, a child enthusiast, convicted drunk driver, wife beater, went looking for trouble and found it.
@@DovahKanye oh wow I didn't know Kyle was married as well. Just add that to the list I guess.
@@OccultDemonCassette You failed hard with that comment, the rotting corpse he put in the ground was the wife beater, nice try though.
@@DovahKanye oh wowwee jee golly.
Weapons charges were dropped because of gun law in WI. If you're 17 or 18, it is legal to open carry a gun matching the description of the gun Kyle had. He said later that he was aware of this law. Also, the gun wasn't illegally obtained, and Kyle took possession of it in Kenosha after sleeping there the previous night. He was legal, gun charges dropped
Thanks for saying this. I almost want to share the video but him getting that detail wrong does not instil me with confidence in his research.
F** the national anthem. White Trump supporters don't never support Tamir Rice and other black kids that got killed by racist white officers. F** the American flag. I'll p!ss on the flag 365 days every year. F the anthem. I support Kaepernick and Tamir Rice
Rittenhouse's friend, Dominick Black, bought the AR-15 for Rittenhouse, using Kyle's cash money, was charged with strawman purchase. Just last month he pleaded guilty to a lesser charge of "contributing to the delinquency of a minor" and paid a $2000 fine to avoid prison.
@@nextworld9176 means the government had a weak case.
@@nextworld9176 That charge was wrong, and he can and should get his money back. This is the USA, where we have the legal right to own firearms for self defense without infringement. Yes, it is a dangerous freedom; as we are well aware of that. Commies and child molesters could get sn0t without even knowing you're sn00t1ng commies and child molesters.
Something I like about Dr. Grande is he’s not afraid to talk about controversial topics.
The only reason this case is controversial is because our media is run by scumbags
Indeed.
Touché.
How about a President suffering with dementia....?
@@treestandsafety3996 ssshhhhh!
The most crazy revelation is that Kraus withheld evidence from the defense. He provided a significantly lower quality video, that had an altered filename, meta data showing a file creation date 20 minutes later. The attorney claimed that he didn't know how the file could have been compressed, but his courtroom laptop shows two programs used for cropping and reducing resolution of video. Handbrake and Format Factory (in the same folder as the video evidence clips)
Altered evidence.
They literally altered the video, the file name was different as was the quality. That was intentional without a shadow of a doubt, they claimed sending it through e-mail changes the file, but that's also incorrect.
These are pretty serious and definitely grounds for a mistrial
Oof
He should be disbarred. If it wasn't for the good sense and decency of the jury to follow the letter or the law, that boy could have ended up in prison for the rest of his life on the basis of altered evidence. It's sickening.
Just subscribed; This is likely the most sound & cerebral breakdown of the entire spectacle that I've heard so far. Well done.
Incorrect.
@@cannonball8885 please elaborate.
Not really, I mean Dr Grande doesn't understand that people don't like to see their communities and businesses torched. The video is surprisingly short sighted and shallow, I get the impression sitting on the fence is easier for Dr Grande than actually dealing with tough facts.
the only thing that's damning is the claim he shouldn't have been there because it was illegal for him to be out and protect property. If the law can't protect people from another, then you are allowed to do it yourself.
@@MrShadowfax42 what are these difficult facts you speak of and how does one sit on the fence when agreeing with the verdict? I'm presuming you oppose his critic of Kyles's full intentions when he entered the chaotic spectacle taking place in Kenosha. I guess his acquittal also meant his moral compass was completely intact although that wasn't on trial now was it.
What a brilliant, level-headed and wise analysis of tragedy.
What tragedy? A child rapist and a wife beater are deceased, an out-of-town gunman survived but with time to reflect, and his town was saved.
Fun fact. 100% of non attackers didn't get shot by Rittenhouse
inspiration for minor to look for self defense opportunities
Fun fact. If that was me I would be 100% under a prison right now
The defense proved that 100% . The indisputable fact is he drove an hour away from home and went there for confrontation . There was a bunch of armed militia there . But somehow he ended up by himself . Somehow he became under threat . Somehow he was the only one that killed . This is unforgivable. If he stayed home no one would be dead today .
@@digitaldecibles No
Fun fact any other race would of never been allowed out there to walk 🚶 around out there with any kind of weapon
The collective IQ of a mob is equal to the loudest person, divided by the number of people in the mob.
- Commander Vimes
The events of 6 January prove this to be true.
So do all the BLM riots
@@nice8401 so does your comment fool
🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍
@@willowgrey989 racist
Pretty good analysis. One major point of contention. There is no evidence he pointed his weapon at anyone. There is hearsay 3rd party statements, no other evidence through out all of the various videos and images.
I haven't seen any evidence of these white supremacist links either.
There is an image of it, anyway that guy was only shot in the arm.
@@Zoney06 No, there isn't. There is one blurry image, so pixelated Mario in the original NES game looks clearer, in which nothing is visible.
The fact he shot people shows he was pointing the gun at them 🤦♂️
@@Si1234321 That was never disputed during the trial, by either side. The prosecution claimed that Kyle pointing his weapon at Joshua Ziminsky instigated the first shooting, but there was zero evidence or testimony to confirm this, besides extremely shady video footage submitted very late in the trial that was something of a Rorschach test. The one person who could have confirmed or denied it, Ziminsky himself, was prevented from testifying when the prosecution charged him with arson.
If people spoke in a calm manner like this, conflicts could be resolved much less violently. A further note, the fact that he could have an assault rifle in his hands in a mob area but can't vote or buy a alcoholic beverage illustrates a larger problem with the priorities in society.
If the police were doing their jobs and actually arresting violent criminals then the responsibility wouldn’t fall on civilians, regardless of age, to defend people’s livelihoods.
Although I disagree. I get your statement. Hope you’re doing well brother.
He didn't have an assault rifle. An Ar-15 is not an assault rifle.
Guns don't cloud your judgement and voting requires a much more mature mental state, not that age determines maturity level but generally it does. But sure, blame the gun. 🤡
No. It was a rifle, not an assault rifle. You don't know what you're talking about.
Whoever ordered the Kenosha police to stand down and allowed the riots should be the ones on trial here...
problem is..... the riots were because of the police shooting jacob blake (which was ruled a good shooting). So cops stopping the riot that is aimed at cops.... just creates a no win situation. SO you have a situation where they are trying to contain it to a certain area- but not directly interacting with anybody involved with the riot.
More of like who started the riots should be on trial here lol
It was only briefly touched on but I believe at least three members of the same family hold some form of official office or position in Kenosha, not saying they are responsible but it looks sketchy when everyone in charge is related or good friends.
Unfortunately they were out.. bu they’re 1. Burnt down a police station. 2. There was so much chaos all the police were busy.. 3. Litearlly they told businesses they were on their own cause they can’t get to them there were more urgent dangers.. fires.. no one should have been there.. and they should have arrested every blm Antifa rioter. Which they weren’.. and they wil do it again..
Yet kyle is the one to blame.
All of them traveled to Kenosha.. with guns.. kiminski and Caine included. Rosenbaum litearlly saying N word.. i mean.. if those people aren’t provoking and looking for trouble.. there is no logic anymore
@@abprepboy33 well.. his gf called the cops.. he was taking her cars with her kids inside. There was a machete in the car with kids.. the cops tried to pull him and arrest him but he was too strong.. and the night before he R the girlfriend.. i don’ think thats. A hero.. and he’s not dead. He’s alive..
I haven’t seen someone talk about the case without letting politics get in the way, and it is a breath of fresh air. Thank you
Ikr! The whole protest thing makes discussions about the case really muddy.
He should not have used that thumbnail. That is of Kyle having a PTDS reaction. It's unethical. He also should not have repeated the slanderous white supremacy accusations. This has been definitively proven false and defamation charges are forthcoming.
sure, if you ignore the fact this guy just believes everything Rittenhouse says.
@@jasonn6306 I’m going to be honest with you it’s not illegal to defend yourself. So when nothing is pointing to an intent to kill, I as well as many others tend to believe it’s self defense.
@@sandstone_joe5118 who has argued any differently? Democrats want you to defend your life. They don't want vigilantee children running the street with loaded rifles. It seems to me that loading a rifle and driving 40 miles to an event shows at least some intent.
I appreciate your honest overview and analysis. Definitely no heroes in this case. Unfortunate that no one in the media or politics will discuss the lessons that should be learned as you describe them.
defending your nation from terrorist (this junkies are not protestors) by puting your life on the line, is what we call a hero
Kyle Rittenhouse is a hero. There are less child rapists and woman beaters on the streets now.
By all accounts, Kyle was there all night doing good deeds that the police and fire departments were too cowardly to do (putting out fires, cleaning up graffiti, providing medical aid).
Idk about you but that's the closest thing we have to a hero in this case.
Kyle killed a 5 time child abusing pervert. Some of you seem disappointed...especially leftists.
Kyle was putting out fires and giving aid. A dude with an illegal gun tried to kill him....
Watching this months later while marathoning your videos - probably the most reasonable take I've heard to this day. If anything, this just shows that the law and the public alike are unprepared for reality.
The whole thing was absolute chaos.
The entire event and proceedings were viewed through a political lens, and Kyle himself has been retroactively applied, and become representative of, a political idealogy. No one can judge _anything_ these days objective and independent from emotional response and personal politics, or without grouping themselves with one side against another, where everything is clear cut black and white and good vs evil. It's absurd and ridiculous.
“All of humanity’s problems stem from man’s inability to sit quietly in a room alone” - Blaise Pascal
That is the problem with society!! Kyle had to go out and do the work of men because they were too busy sitting quietly. Well done Kyle. You are a national hero. ♥️
@@mslorna78 you just posted a reactionary thought under a profound statement. Pascal wasn’t saying we should be idle idiots, he was saying we are unwilling to sit with our thoughts/beliefs to decipher where they come from and why we believe them. Btw, I don’t think I’m better than you and I’m not talking down to you like some pompous a-hole. I didn’t complete high school, and I’m only two generations removed from illiterate mountain folk.
As adults it might be a good idea to keep up with the “time outs” we were placed on as kids. Like a little reset, I’m getting irritated. Time out!
@@mslorna78 🤣
@@mslorna78 People who pal around with white Supremacists aren't heroes.
There were so many things I learned during the trial that the media didn’t disclose. I didn’t know that Kyle Rittenhouse had connections in Kenosha Ie…family and job. I didn’t know he was doing things like cleaning up graffiti. The media made it sound like he had no ties at all in Kenosha. I found it very odd that the media was on the side of the antagonist. They should not have been on anybody’s side and just reported the facts. I feel the jury made a fair and just decision in finding him not guilty.
Goes to show how biased our "reporting" truly is.
The white supremacy smears are also completely false. Except all of these malicious propaganda outlets to get hit with defamation lawsuits.
Stay away from mainstream media. The Hill gives decent coverage. Breaking Points is okay. Some great independent journalists are Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi if you aren't familiar with them already. Glenn Greenwald gave a SUPERB analysis that I highly recomment. Jimmy Dore is a comedian/journalist. Those that I mentioned are honest lefties. The Hill and Breaking Points give multiple perspectives. Some centrists and right leaning (but honest) sources are Tim Pool (TimCast), Alison Morrow, Ivory Hecker. Firmly on the right (but honest about it) is Daily Wire.
Sadly, they are still pushing that narrative. However, after watching some of their videos here on RUclips, the commenters don't seem to agree with them.
You haven't noticed?
The media is far left
Stupidity is bringing a skateboard to a gun fight.
If we keep having these nights of lawlessness this sort of thing will keep happening
Dr Grande, this case wasn’t political, it was politicized. The essence of the case itself was actually ethical in nature. But understand, this country has basically replaced ethics with politics and morality with social media so I don’t blame you.
Very true. They've tried so hard to make it racial, when it really wasn't.
And they haven't stopped. They are pouring gas on the fire hoping it explodes.
@@LizRealGirlBeauty For real, every person in the case was right
lmao it's like you don't even know what these words mean. when something gets politicized, it becomes political - why? because of public opinion (sOcIeTy aka 'murica aka rights aka freedom - you're all saying the same thing, except you _only_ care to put "my" in front of it)
the case itself was not ethical in nature. the prosecution never had any case and the only "evidence" that they had when the lies and obfuscation were shot down were a highly manipulated stillframe that could not have shown what they claimed it showed (because the frames before and after it show him holding the gun in the complete opposite orientation and the sling he had would have make it basically impossible to do what they said).
They intentionally downsized a video (the prosecutor still had the video downsizing software handbrake in the same folder as their video "evidence" ffs) to provide the defendants no means of confronting their "real evidence". A violation of the Brady act.
and on both of these matters Kraus lied to the court, which is why the judge hinted that he might get him under oath before proceeding.
I’m a leftie and I’m not going to lie, my gut reaction is that I should dislike Kyle and that he should be charged with murder. But when I actually look at the facts I truly think he was defending himself. Perhaps he shouldn’t have been there in the first place but neither should anyone else that was there. Also, there is a lot of misinformation about what actually happened that night.
"my gut reaction is that I should dislike Kyle and that he should be charged with murder"
Why?
@@apuapustaja1958 I’m honestly not sure. I guess just because the whole thing has been very politicized.
Same.
Well at least you can admit it. Alot of people in political bubbles (on either side) can have less information about what actually happens or skewed information. Its really a huge problem and most people don't have the time to look at all angles and try to find the most likely conclusion. In this case I would say he should have the charges dropped or lessened at the least.
@@apuapustaja1958 it's the bias talking but I'm glad she went through the facts especially the whole video of the event.
Thank you for your Videos, Dr. Grande they are informative and interesting!
The curfew was later ruled on by a Kenosha Judge as being unlawful. This was explained by the Judge during the trial. So many people missed this and it is very important to be informed with accurate facts.
You are correct. It was also not being enforced. The weapons charge was also thrown out because according to Wisconsin law, he was allowed to carry a long barreled rifle.
Who cares? Does the strictness of the curfew change one thing? Now tell me why its OK for him to show up to this event with a loaded rifle and take care of business.
@@Jeremy_the_bot because that's what the second amendment allows.
When the government let's the people down they can defend themsely
@@Jeremy_the_botok, but why is it ok for Rioters to go to this event and RUIN businesses?
@@Jeremy_the_bot are u gonna go up against violent arsonists and looters unarmed? You woud get mauled like hundreds that got injured or killed during blm riots in the last couple of years. Protecting your community (it's property and people) is 100% legal, and kyle only used the least force neccesary, only shooting when he had to only at people who were a direct threat to his life and wellbeing.
My race shouldn't matter, but I'm African-American. I graduated from law school. I've worked in law enforcement at all levels and have a lot of knowledge with it. If it hadn't been for politics, this case would never have gone to trial. To be honest, saying that makes me sad. It reminds me of how messed up the people in charge of the system are. After receiving the investigation's findings and examining all of the evidence. The only option for the prosecutors to convict Kyle was to show that the first shooting was not in self-defense. The shooting of the two other people would have been criminal as well. If you watched the trial, you'll notice that Kyle did not get acquitted. Kyle should never have been charged in the first place.
I see you as a true American. Well said sir!
Looked more like the state setting prescedent that they will make you suffer and work to prove your innocence even if you were clearly defending yourself. Police were told to stand down and watch it burn despite their oath
You are an honest fellow.
I'm wondering if it wasn't illegal for Kyle to be in possession of that gun, then why is his friend in trouble for buying it for him? I'm just trying to make sense of that part.
@@nanalee1027 Because technically you cannot buy a gun for someone else, because the individual who is going to own the weapon has to be the one to pass a background check. It may not be the easiest case to make though, if Kyle's friend can prove that he was the lawful owner of the gun and was only letting Kyle use it under his supervision.
Nice selection of his thumbnail pic. Is there no end to Dr Grande’s tongue in cheek? Lol
Thank you for the analysis of this case. This case has troubled me for so long. After listening to you I realized I was very much forming my opinion based on political views. I now have a different way of thinking about this case and feel less upset that Rittenhouse was not found guilty.
Ugh shut up !
There was never any reason for you to be upset. It was obvious self-defense.
Imagine what else u were being lied about....
There is literally no clear or convincing evidence he ever pointed his weapon at anyone prior to being attacked
@@davidschneide5422 what you just described happened during the attack where the 5x child butt rapist was already in pursuit of Rittenhouse after threatening to kill him if he got him alone
Agree. The ONLY claim the prosecution has is that he provoked Rosenbaum by pointing his gun at another person. The video and photo they are using as "evidence" is is terrible. The prosecution kept claiming that "You can clearly see Mr. Rittenhouse pointing his gun at Kaminski". No you can't. You can't see anything in the video or blurry photo. The original scenario they laid out was debunked as it showed him aiming as a left-handed individual would. Rittenhouse is left handed. The prosecution then changed their narrative claiming he was facing a different direction, proving they have no idea what they were looking at either, just throwing shit on the wall hoping it sticks. Prosecutors aren't supposed to lie, or speculate about evidence, that's illegal to do. Yet the judge let them get away with it in the ONLY possible piece of evidence they have to convict Rittenhouse. The judge even admitted he couldn't see anything in the video.
@karen gordon To defend himself from potential attackers. Looks like his decision was prescient, no?
@karen gordon why didn't he just surrender to the mob? Why didn't he let them beat him to death, that way only one person would have to die.....
@karen gordon He has the right to be out there with a gun. He was doing the community a service and protecting property\businesses from despicable rioters. Besides, the place he went to did not prohibit open carry.
Soooo I see nothing wrong here. You need to do more research before opening your mouth. RosenBum and the other nit wit got exactly what they deserve. Don't attack someone with a skateboard, don't point a gun at him, you won't bite the bullet. They did, so now they're maggot food lol.
Quick question, why would you chase someone who is carrying a gun?
I would call the police... if I was not black, of course.
@@hwi6913 they wouldn't show up regardless of race
If you were really brave and trying to save lives by disarming the shooter, yes.
@@maryanneborders9602 That's a funny way of saying a pedo ran after him after Kyle healed 2 of the rioters and extuinguished the fires the rioters were making. The pedo is going to burn in hell forever while Kyle walks free, don't worry :D
@@Klongu_Da_Bongu Kyle "healed" people ?!? Wow - you sayin' he's Jesus now ?! Delusional.
On another note, Dr. Grande you are a comedic genius. A master of dry humor and black comedy!
I came into this angry and wanting to write this off…but man you really helped me put things into perspective
You should still be angry. What we got here is a legal analysis by someone who's not qualified to give one.
"When politics enter the room, logic typically stands up and leaves" I'm going to share this with everyone I know and claim it as my own.
😁
😂😂😂😂
Couldn’t be any truer. We all are going to be sounding so smart and full of wisdom. Lol
Please don't. I usually don't comment on RUclips at all but people being so quick to adopt this phrase just because it sounds smart is actually really frustrating me. "When politics enter the room, logic usually gets up and leaves."
While I understand what he was trying to say with that statement in context it really quite bothers me. Politics are not inherently illogical. They can create strong emotions but it's not as if the act of engaging in politics or having strong political beliefs itself is illogical. This reads as if he's just conflating politics with emotions. Like there were a lot of politics during the civil rights movement but it's not like MLK threw logic out the window every time he got on stage to speak. Imagine if I shot someone, and I had a prior history of shooting people of that persons particular marginalized community. It would be both logical AND political to assume that it was probably a hate based crime.
@@jamarmaduke6752 hey you tried to look smart and ended up just sounding schizophrenic and make a comparison that involved shooting someone. Take a breath.
Mhern57 aka Shakespeare I never heard that before so you can take the credit🤣
RUclips makes this so hard now, i just want an unbiased opinion. From the perspective of someone who wnats no ties to this. I really wanted the straight facts that were proven during the case, nad the fact that i have to trudge through all these offical posts from news channels piss me off. Thanks for helping me clear the air. I was up in the air because how much misinformation can come out of something like this.
What you can do is watch the video from both shootings and take your own ideas. Watching videos show that all the shootings where in self defense. The first video was taken by a drone without anybody's knowledge.
Don't watch CNN, MSNBC, etc they lied about the case. Watch the complete videos of the trial examination and cross examination and make up your own mind. If you hear 'he crossed state lines with a gun' in the opinion being given to you then discount the person's opinion.
Yeah and with the dislike button now gone it’s really hard to see how many people disagree with a video. I don’t mean this video but news channels too.
@David Wang You showed your partisan bias when you only called out Fox news instead of the entire corporate media establishment.
@David Wang The prosecutors botched it by bringing charges against Kyle. They should of brought charges against all those there taking part in the violence, including Kyle's attackers. You just don't like the fact Kyle acted with bravery and honor and the ones that attacked Kyle used bad judgement, were stupid and shouldn't of been there. Tell me what was Kyle's bad judgement and what did he do that was stupid? Kyle had every right to be there and help defend his friend's property. If not Kyle then who?
This idea of "show no resistance" when faced with criminals is galling and mind-bendingly stupid. You want a mob of rioters to roam the streets burning, looting and endangering other peoples lives? The idea that no one should defend their property or life, and let criminals do what they want, is stupid. Is that what you want?
9:20 Here in Florida, that most certainly would not be the case, arsonry is a forcible felony and grounds for use or threatening to use deadly force when confronted to stop it's imminent commission.
not if its not your property
Same in Texas
Can I waive my right to a jury trial and have Dr. Grande decide my case?
What's funny is he says he wasn't intending on shooting kyle, yet he posted that his only regret was hesitating on shooting kyle.
Yeah, cause if he had shot him Kyle wouldn’t have shot his arm. It’s called hindsight.
@@berniestephens4506 wow no shit sherlock!
@@s2wuolf508 So he wasn’t intending to shoot Kyle. Kyle was intending to shoot him.
@@berniestephens4506 kyle wasn’t intending to shoot him until he felt threatened by the handgun in his hand being pointed at him
@@switchskys7413 It wasn’t pointed at him until Kyle blew his bicep apart and his arm was hanging down limp - at which point he couldn’t have pulled the trigger even if he wanted to. So what you’re really saying is Kyle felt threatened by the presence of a gun (whilst he was in possession of a gun). He had also aimed a gun at Rosenbaum prior to shooting him - so perhaps Rosenbaum felt threatened by the gun being pointed at him? You don’t lose the right to self defence if you’re unarmed. Kyle killed AT LEAST one person unlawfully that night. But in all honesty, all of the shootings at the hands of Rittenhouse are arguably unlawful.
“He was out past curfew” Yeah but wasn’t everyone else out past curfew as well? I find it odd that you mentioned it several times because if everyone followed the curfew this wouldn’t have happened.
Um only one person out there after curfew killed anyone but yeah, everyone else shouldn't have been there. If KKKyle had stayed in Illinois or left when the curfew was announced, none of this would have happened.
@NorseViking84 KKKyle was chased. That much is clear. But at what point did Rosenbaum attack him? Harsh language deserves a bullet these days? Sounds pretty cowardly to me. Kinda like showing up to a protest as a counter protester and shooting unarmed people. Chickenshit cowards.
@@upinafeelings5197 Rosenbaum tried to grab the gun. You: -1
@@upinafeelings5197 PLM 👉👌Right Upina? Pedophile lives matter!
@@momox001 I would too if some random guy is carrying around a long gun at a protest. Why are you here? We’re protesting the death of an unarmed person by police, who did he plan on shooting in the first place? The police? Or other citizens acting upon their rights to protest?
The fact is that most of us didn't live in this town. We didn't go through what most of these folks went through that night or what lead up to this event. We can't sit back and judge what happen while we are watching from afar in our safe places in our homes. We can't know what it was like night after night of these people rioting, burning, and causing all kinds of harm. Who was going to protect this town? Who was there? Where was the National Guard? Where was anyone? I am getting sick and tired of the few people that were willing to fight back even if it meant taking arms with them to protect that town. Doctor...would you get off your fucking high horse that you sit on and protect your town if you had violent rioters burning your town down and protect at all costs. Would you? You can sit in judgement as to what Rittenhouse did . I am glad this kid did what he felt he had to do. There mountain of evidence that supported him that none of us saw because we weren't there to see it. Stop this shit Doctor and move on. It's done. His life is about moving on. I suggest you move on too. It's over. We all need to move on. This does not do us any good to rehash what happened that night. It was awful. It was terrible. I was sick to death to see our country go from normal to complete riot out of control. Whose fault is it? Think hard it's not a hard answer. The fact is Doctor, you have never had a conversation with Rittenhouse. You have seen only interviews with him or followed the trial. You can't know who he is unless you do a case study on him for a long period of time. You have is just a guess drawing from your expertise. This young man had to make a split choice that night. Do I die or do I kill. He made the right choice. Why was he there? Because he wanted to save the town. He wanted to save someone. Make a difference. I think it is that simple.
Isn't it funny how Dr. Grande's short summary of Jacob Blakes shooting makes it sound entirely reasonable?
Is that the dude whose GF reported him to police for rape & for trying to drive her car away while her kids were in it?
Thanks Dr. G. for your words of wisdom this Thursday afternoon: “When politics enter the room logic typically stands up and leaves…everyone behaved foolishly…none are heroes.”
Kyle Rittenhouse is.
@@sealbeater if thats your hero you must have trouble with screw top caps and can openers.
I disagree. Rittenhouse is a hero even if he didn't make perfect decisions
You Kyle adorers must REALLY admire Duterte.
Yes and thank God for CNN and Fox News, who carefully guided these fools into these actions. Without Fox and CNN we would have not this incredible drama to watch.
This quote alone was worth watching the video
"When POLITICS enters the room, LOGIC typically stands up and leaves...They can't exist at the same place, At the same time"
Amen
Leftists are inoculated against logic. Pre-K is their latest idea.
Any connection?
@@charlese2833 you're further proving the point, bud.
@@charlese2833 he's talking about you bro
I stopped watching the video at 1 minute. In the first minute, he clearly showed his bias. He never mentioned the charges of the black man who was shot by the police (type of charges always matter, as it shows potential for being aggressive/assaultive) and he worded the man's actions as “he refused to drop a knife“. He refused to drop a knife. He refused to drop a knife. Goodbye. Thanks.
Omg how did I miss this analysis 🧐 just seeing it . A good one
finally a video about the topic that isn't from a news channel
"I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6." Great quote.
I told this my parents, and they were furious
If it’s 11 Whites and 1 black juror for a Black man. The Black man will be guilty 💯 percent of the time. It should be 6 blacks and 6 whites. They always have more white jurors. So your quote only applies to White people. A WICKED COUNTRY THAT WE BLACKS LIVE IN…. But the blood 🩸 is on their hands 🤚🏻 and will be judged by THE MOST HIGH 🕊📖🕊
@@Prudent_ No one involved in this case is black, Kenosha is extremely white. That's just not how juries are decided.
@@Prudent_ delusional
Gee Levi so if this happened in a predominantly black area (say 90%), you’d argue for 6 blacks and 6 whites on the jury?
You missed an extremely important detail.
A moment before Kyle turned to see Rosenbaum lunging at him, someone in the crowd behind them fired a handgun in the air.
Maybe, but it wasnt Rosenbaum was it. How do we know that Rosenbaum wasn't running from the sound of the gun. Also, I would attempt to grab a rifle if it was pointed at me unarmed.
@@aj529 Then if you get shot, it would be your fault.
@@aj529 'I would attempt t grab a rifle if it was pointed at me' and we would all laugh as we read your Darwin Award entry...
AHHH ok, so that give him permision to shoot 4 times to someone that didn't shoot that gun, including his head
@@aj529 pointed at u while running from u? 😂😂 are u playing GTA or just braindead
my dad was in the army taugth me to respect guns and how they aren't toys and if you are going to point it at some one is because your are going to shoot them, never to flaunt or anything else.
This is your funniest video ever, respectively. Dr. Grande
"I'd rather be carry by 12 than to be carried my 6" Hilarious!!!
To be quite honest with you if someone is running away (like Kyle is in EVERY video) and the person running away has an semi-automatic assault rifle and you can clearly see that they are in posession of that semi-automatic assault rifle, it's probably unwise for you to chase after them. It's always wiser to run in the opposite direction of someone carrying a gun. Unless you're a police officer then it's your job but if you're a civilian, don't be a hero, don't go chasing people with guns because they can end up shooting you in self defense if they fear you're about to attack them.
To be honest that doesn’t really allow Kyle to start shooting at three people even if the first lunged at him. He’s the asshole who went out there with a gun. Piece of shit should be locked up.
@@puffmoneyo3590 Incorrect. Kyle went to Kenosha because his father lives there and he felt that protecting Kenosha is like he's protecting his community. In 2020 during the riots a lot of civilians who are gun owners were hired by business owners to protect their shops from looting and destruction. Kyle was one of those standing guard with his rifle. I don't know the events that led up to the videos showing Kyle running away with people chasing him but I did see all videos available that show seconds before attack. That's ALL the videos show. We must judge based on what we know. Also, one of the people Kyle shot, was pointing a gun at Kyle, before Kyle shot him. So that guy then also shouldn't have a gun right? Also, the people there shouldn't have been rioting and looting and destroying property. If there was no looting rioting, Kyle wouldn't be there with his gun.
Ok interesting that you say that cuz Kyle could not been tryna "be a hero" and stayed his ass home and let the police handle it. Also not a good idea to go to a riot with a gun and expect nothing bad to happen.
@@joannamonique707 But there were no police. In Democrat led states police were told to stand down largely. This is why we saw the rioting, looting, burning continue on for months. So civilians took it upon themselves to protect their own businesses. Some hired armed civilians while some armed civilians offered their protection services for free. Kyle is just ONE of out of over 1000 people who were standing armed guarding businesses across the Country but you don't hear anything about the 1000 other armed guards.
@@joannamonique707 Also, using your own argument against you, you shouldn't "be a hero" and go after a guy armed with a gun. You should let the police handle it.
This is the fairest coverage of this case I've ever seen. No politics, just facts. Thank you Dr. Grande!
Literally heard a dude give the worst take on this I've ever heard today. I tried to balance it out so I watch coverage of the trial on like some more right leaning podcasts and channels and then I'll watch a little bit more on some more left leaning ones and go back and forth. But this dude today takes the cake he tried to argue that all self-defense is wrong. And the way he defended his statement was he said that if the mob attacked Rittenhouse and killed him there would be one dead person. Him defending himself led to two dead people therefore it's logically better to let the mob kill him. The flaming hoops these people will do backflips through to not have to admit it was self-defense and justified. Just add obviously I'm not saying Dr grande said this stuff but I have to put this on here or someone will comment on my comment saying Dr grande never said that.
This was a really good, non-partisan synopsis of the case. As a proud card carrying Left-Wing Liberal, I want so bad to say fuck this little wannabe cop turd, but after hearing the facts of the case, I gotta grudgingly except that at least in the eyes of the law, he's not guilty of the charges. I'm quite sure this little Mama's boy dipshit was specifically there looking for trouble, but sadly, that's not a crime, while assaulting someone who's looking for trouble is. It sucks, but when you initiate an attack on someone, they have the right to defend themselves. They don't lose that right just because they're a racist piece of Right Wing shit.
Watch the trial yourself. Dr Grande is incorrect in some of his statements.
@Layla Caballero let me go back and put the errors in order.
Mmm....I love Dr. G but I watched every second of the entire trial (I am a lawyer and used to do criminal law and consult for voir dire--jury selection). He didn't get his trial facts completely right in this video here. We MAY have a hung jury on the most serious charges after today's fantastic cross. We shall see!
I'd like to see a Dr. Grande analysis of the prosecutor Thomas Binger.
See this is why you need to listen to the full story, because people had me thinking this guy just walked up and shot up a blm protest. Man this world is so manipulative.
Edit: I also like how you put it in a different perspective of being guilty as well of the actual trial. Thank you sir
Stupid people always listen to the loudest stupid people, that’s how I see it
@@LeeY0uTube 👍
I still find it hilarious they call him a white supremacist for the 👌 symbol
@@Darthwgamer sheesh thay 2021 for ya. Get *OFFENDED* lol
@@SicKem That's Twitter for ya!
Simple as this. Kyle won his case Because there was clear audio and video of the whole incident and it proved to be self-defense. And it didn’t help that the prosecution proved to be corrupt as well.
Not sure how much of prosecutorial misconduct the Jury was aware of.
@David Wang someones triggered
And because the judge literally stacked the entire case in his favor
@@JoseGonzalez-kr8gg by being fair...which means the evidence was in his favor...the judge could have allowed the prosecutor to cheat and lie but he didnt. He could have tossed the case out but let it go on. He didnt allow the abundant criminal histories of the guys who got shot into trial when he could have. He didnt actively do anything to help Kyle but at the same time he didnt help the prosecution.
I know some people prefer a hanging judge and like it when the cops beat a confession out of people but thats not right.
@@cuzz63 by being fair? He was literally taking selfies with him and ddnt allow the prosecution to use audio recording of him expressing the desire to shoot protestors. If you deny that the american justice system isnt influenced by white supremacy then you might be a white supremacist
THANK YOU! As somebody who wanted a breakdown without all the political b.s., you delivered beyond desire!
Funnels of reality!
It is IMPOSSIBLE to judge the Rittenhouse case without politics or what you are calling the political BS. Rittenhouse would never have been charged without the politics and furthermore, the incident would have not have happened without the politics. What you are saying is as nonsensical as saying let's analyze this election without all the political bs. You simply cannot remove politics from something inherently political.
@@tarstarkusz nah
@@tarstarkusz ot wasn't political , it wa politicized
@@rigovalentine I agree it is not inherently political, but it was made political by the prosecutor's office. They have never had a chance of getting a conviction.
It was a show trial. But that goes along with the modern American police state. The US has political prisoners. The FBI is the stasi or KGB. We torture our political prisoners and lock them in solitary for years on end. Most of all, we have political selective enforcement of the law. We are the evil empire. We live under rule of men, not rule of law. We are hopelessly corrupt beyond reform.
A well thought out and measured breakdown of events. Good stuff.
Good upload Dr. I know some details where left out but your analysis was right on the nose without all the BS. Thank you 🙏🏽
Of course it’s hindsight now, but the gun possession charge was dismissed.
Yeah like the attempted murder charge from the assailant not the “victim” Gaige but I believe it’s because of the whole political side and what the people were swayed by or how it would be taken wack
I believe he should have been charged for illegally possessing a weapon. He clearly went there looking for trouble.
@@dperr338 yeah despite yknow, giving first aid to people and being videotaped beforehand saying he had it for self defense.
@@Renovartio 1. He's a minor that was in a area carrying a weapon he wasn't legally allowed to carry defending property that's not his own during a curfew. If he never went down there looking for trouble he would have never been sitting in a court room.
@@dperr338 Yeah and if the individuals who were shot didn't show up "looking for trouble" then no one would be hurt. You are a silly goose.
There is no evidence that he actually pointed the gun at anyone besides when he had to defend himself
The people calling him a racist for shooting two white men is pure comedy gold! 😂
@@politicjunkee hey it's 2021 maybe they identify as black lol
@@spellmadam2947 🤣
He should have just stayed home in the first place he went out to find trouble and cause violence
@@Luvvserena111 but he didn't and now a convicted sex offender and a domestic abuser are dead. Seems like everything turned out alright to me.
I agree with 8/10ths of this video but Rittenhouse and the gang had permission to be there by the owners (around 4-5 people testified to that). I'm also having a hard time understanding how being on a private property during the riot while armed (allowed by law) during a curfew (wasn't legal and was thrown out by Judge) is in any way is asking for it. Imagine saying a woman who was attacked was asking for it because "insert meaningless reason here that's shifting the blame from the attacker to the victim here". A smart person wouldn't have been there, but the people who were weren't looking for trouble, they have the right to live without someone attacking them cause they feel they're not on their team.
Thank you! I was having trouble finding a way to say what you just said.
Very sound and good analysis, Dr. Grande! Should be shown in all high schools.❤️
Yes, maybe some sense will diminish the useless vigilanteism and ignorant vocalization of this lost generation.
Your wrong about him not being able to possess the fire arm. The judge said he was not able to purchase the firearm. And that it was legal to possess it.
If he was hunting* he was not.
@@jinx4564 Wrong, there was lengthy discussion about how part of the bill is dedicated to hunting, but some is simply possession. The gun charges were essentially dropped as the judge agrees it was lawful to own it.
@@mengoinggodsway9024 17 year olds can walk around with AR-15's not registered to them and unsupervised past curfew? That's wild
@@xcbaby123 Judge said curfew was not a factor in the case. He's allowed to possess with permission. Supervision was not needed. Also, every male over 17 up to a certain age, is allowed to carry, as they are part of the militia of the United States, per the Constitution.
@@mengoinggodsway9024that is wild. glad I didn't have a gun when I was 17. I was very immature
Thank you for your analysis. Sadly, the amount of neutral/unbiased/apolitical news coverage, opinion, or analysis that exists is almost non-existent today. Where are we to turn to?
Independent journalists
Reality.
I recommend Rikeita Law. Their coverage was nothing short of spectacular on this case.
@@Anon_E_Muss equally bias. Media is not qualified to cover the law. Look at Cenk Ugyer. He is a lawyer and independent media. His coverage was and is still highly biased.
I personally recommend viva free. Mostly talks law but is very good at what he does
“He was looking for trouble” is a dumb take. I am not looking for a car crash when I wear my seatbelt. If a woman brings a gun with her to walk down a seedy street, she isn’t looking to get attacked.
In both cases the person is taking preventative measures against possible harm. Kyle wasn’t seeking exhilaration, he was helping people. He also didn’t think he was invincible, as he fled the confrontations instead of meeting them head on.
Kyle had a history of community service. He enrolled in cadet classes, was a lifeguard, took medical classes and brought medical supplies with him to the riot. He clearly wasn’t seeking excitement, and clearly understood the inherent dangers of the place he was attending.
Also, if Kyle had left the gun at home, he would have been killed. If Kyle had left himself home, some other guy would have been killed. Because it wasn’t Kyle that started this, it was the serial pedophile. And it wasn’t the gun that the serial pedophile took offense to, it was his mistaken belief that Kyle was putting out his dumpster fires. You solve nothing by taking Kyle’s rights away.
You admit it’s legal to attend the protest with a gun in the state of Wisconsin. You also admit there is no evidence that Kyle threatened anyone. You have nothing to back your assertions, and you admit it. But for some reason, you must still blame the victim for doing lawful actions. Crazy.
Well said.
When I hear people still arguing to this day that Kyle committed murder it's always because, in their opinion, carrying a gun like he did should be illegal. Many times they're arguing that it is, despite the judge explaining very clearly why that was not the case (whether it was MEANT to pertain only to hunting doesn't matter if the law is worded badly). People, it doesn't matter what you think the law SHOULD be. What matters is what it says. Thanks for a good, informative video :)
Does the average person have the right to self defense? Especially when the local police refuse or are told to stand down while many are rioting.
No, our government is trying to tell us to not defend ourselves and instead rely solely on the police with their prosectuion of Rittenhouse. They tell the police to stand down and watch the city burn and in the same breath attempt to convict a kid who would’ve literally been slaughtered on the street if he didn’t pull the trigger. There’s way bigger shit going on here than a pedophile and two thugs getting their due dilligence
@@rissa1715 here’s an idea. Let’s not condone the burning and destruction of innocent people’s property based on lies about “an unarmed black man being murdered by police”. Maybe, just maybe, if people said, “hey, maybe this bad thing did happen. But don’t go and burn innocent people’s businesses and livelihoods down” then this wouldn’t have happened.
That’s a good point. What are citizens supposed to do when police stand down? Although I think this case never should’ve gone to trial I’m kind of glad it did because now it validates that a citizen has the right to protect themselves and their property.
I'm sure this is a question the jurors asked themselves. Hence the verdict. That state law is open carry. Then the circumstantial evidence is clear as day on film. The circumstances of the night proved not guilty
Every person in the country has the right to self defense, however laws vary state to state. Some require you to flee first, others do not. I would highly suggest reading your state's specific laws on self defense so God forbid you ever need to act in self defense, you know what is lawful and what isn't and whether or not you have to take attempts to flee or not.
It has been said, “Don’t go stupid places, with stupid people to do stupid things.”
There’s another old saying that warns ‘ain’t nothing good happens after midnight’.
I like that
Liberals learned that actions have consequences and are utterly stunned 😂😂😂😂
“Don’t go around wearing red underwear and short skirt”
Stupid games, stupid prizes
I think your analysis of this case is spot on.
Do you support Rittenhouse?
@@luwoowootv8585 I support due process. The jury made their determination based on the facts presented. I wasn’t a witness nor was I on the jury so I defer to their verdict.
@@accessorygirlnyc see , you white Trump supporters don't never support Tamir Rice and other black kids that got killed by racist white officers. I bet y'all claimed that you're not a racist but you don't never support Tamir Rice and other black kids that got killed by racist white officers.
They need to have you on a jury doc!!! Your common sense of what a normal person may think would be evident and agreeable by all!
10:04. This is what is so infuriating about people with your perspective. We had over a year of riots and property damage. A federal courthouse in Portland was repeatedly firebombed with people inside. In fact if it weren’t for the people inside the fires would have spread. US Marshals and federal employees were blinded, concussed, and burned. That is the backdrop of Kenosha being burned and destroyed WITH NO MEANINGFUL RESPONSE FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT!! The government had a responsibility to call in the National Guard and ENFORCE the curfew. Had the done so Kyle and everyone else would not have been there. People living in Kenosha were leaving their homes and hiding in bomb shelters in churches built and meant for nuclear attacks in the 1950. To come after Kyle and try to attach any blame or moral failing is the kind of apolitical dishonesty that will erode and destroy the safety and security of our nation.
Facts
@@LLWW do you know what a fact is? Are you sure?
@@disgruntledemployee9240 I would say that this absolute casserole of nonsense qualifies as a run on sentence, but am unable to do so as there is no punctuation.
@Billsbob Amen
Absolutely
Sounds like a tennis game of cause and effect all around.
Very true
It's more like setting precedent on what is self defense anymore on 2021
This video sounds more like blaming the victims.
Nelo Wolf No actually that’s not correct. It muddies the water of self defense when you bring a rifle out in the streets and play police during antifa riots. There is a reason why the police did not over enforce that night and do you know why? It’s obviously strategic in the sense of not escalating riots further. So when a civilian, “legal child” thinks he can outperform and maneuver the police and breaks curfew knowingly, then you’ve now muddied the situation of what self defense is and have added an additional factor to the chaos. ie pointing your weapon at a rioter in the street is a legitimate provocation argument, that being said you still must defend yourself but it is MUCH different than shooting to kill to defend your home or property. If you think that there is nothing wrong with vigilantism against police will and orders then I assume you do not support the police
Forrest Greene There is that aspect yes. Not the first shooting of Rosenbaum but if any of us were in the streets and heard screams of an active shooter followed by more shots, there are no doubt some of us that would try and subdue the shooter without the knowledge of the original firing of the weapon being perfectly fine self defense. Unfortunate tragedy all around
Exquisite analysis. You changed my mind about this complex case.
OH PLEASE! THIS WAS HIS FATHER AND GRANDMOTHER'S TOWN! IN THE OLD DAYS THIS WOULDN'T EVEN BEEN AN ARGUMENT. COME INTO SOMEONE'S TOWN AND START VANDILIZING BUILDINGS BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T GET YOUR WAY OR THERE WAS AN INJUSTICE YOU DON'T AGREE WITH ...YOU DON'T GET TO BURN DOWN INNOCENT PEOPLE'S COMPANIES!
Exceptional analysis. If only this type of content would be prioritized by media outlets instead of sensationalized nonsense.
In my observation, this case being a prime example, modern media seems to have traveled far beyond sensationalized nonsense and is now firmly entrenched in the territory of politicized propaganda. It's sad to say but that's where we seem to be in our modern world, at each others throats, fueled by a media determined to shape opinions and implant beliefs, rather than informing the people with the facts they both need and deserve.
"These dark days, they've finally come for me, they've come for us all." - Edward Gibbon
: The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire
I know. Unfortunately what sells is controversy. 🤷🏿♂️
I really like your calm, balanced take on controversial issues.
I wouldn’t say he’s balanced, The Dr is very left leaning
@@pokemonisgey I think Dr Grande is actually somewhat right of center.
You put it perfectly..
..his dry sense of humor cracks me up to
That is precisely what everyone likes!!
@@meltedmarshdaddyI don't understand your reply. I really don't understand why you called him uneducated. I am gonna go out on a limb and say he is educated. I think the way he ends every video with all of these different solutions makes him balanced.
Mike didn't try to climb into a vehicle. He went to grab something from the vehicle. Whole the cops were telling him to freeze and put his hands up. They were called there by his babies mother because he was beating her and had a restraining order against him.
The prosecution in this case be like "do you believe that on a pb&j sandwich the peanut butter should be on the top or the jelly?"
If someone attacks me, I want them to find out if there is a afterlife before me.
Gaige didn’t follow one of the most important rules of gun safety what most people are taught when they are children. Don’t point a gun at someone, even if it’s loaded or unloaded.
You apparently missed one of the most important rules.... the gun is always loaded...
@@MyTardisGoWhoosh I wasn’t highlighting all the rules. Besides I think that falls under treat it as if it’s always loaded
Or alternatively you could live in a country where children aren't taught such rules, because children shouldn't have access to guns in the first place ^^
@@TheYuvimon the gun misdemeanor charge was dropped recently, so this point is absolutely mute and irrelevant
@@TheYuvimon So the children grow into adults not knowing Gun rules? That’s stupid
Great level headed simplified explanation for the ones that can't understand the ruling .
Excellent analysis. I never thought the kid should have been convicted of first degree murder, but a child takes an assault weapon into a riot, 2 people are killed and 1 seriously wounded, no one has committed a crime? No one has broken the law? Something is wrong with entire situation.
1)Not an assault weapon
2)He was legally allowed to carry
A lot of things were wrong. The police were told to stand down and ordered to take no action on the rioters. This left the city of Kenosha wide open to violence and mayhem for several nights with no police or emergency services helping the citizens of Kenosha. If you you create a lawless environment and let violent criminals descend on a city and destroy it through vandalism and arson, ordinary citizens WILL STEP UP.
Also, Joseph Rosenbaum should never have been let out of jail after raping 5 young boys, and he should not have been released from the mental hospital that morning. If you create a lawless environment, set criminals free from prison, this is the inevitable result.
All three who were shot were in the acts of committing crimes. They were all violent felons, and the guy who pointed his gun at Kyle had an ILLEGAL weapon. Kyle did not have an "assault weapon." He had a normal rife. It is not more deadly than any other gun.
@@maggiewillowstine3353 he was not legally allowed to cross state lines with a gun as a minor.
@@tubafats100 WATCH. THE. TRIAL. It was proven he didn’t carry the gun over state lines. He was already in Kenosha at the time he got the gun from his friend Dominic Black who is also a resident.
Its called self-defense and should be a worshiped right.
@@tubafats100 You again lol He didn't cross with a firearm, get your info right.
Very logical analysis. Especially appreciate the quote I'd rather be judged by 12 peers than carried by 6 pallbearers.
He wouldn't have been attacked had he not brought the rifle. He went there looking for a problem. Dr. Grand never actually mentioned why he went there to begin with. He was on a mission.
Looked like he was running away and being attacked every single time he fired… weird
Not twelve peers, twelve jury members, lol.
@@incubus_the_man he was on a mission to help because innocent people (some completely unarmed) were being hurt.
@@benwilson5893 a mission to do what? He wasn't trained in medicine or anything else for that matter. One of the guys that he shot was a trained medic. He attacked Rittenhouse because he was afraid of it being an active shooter situation.
Very thorough & insightful analysis. I especially liked the quote, “I’d rather be judged by 12, than carried by six.“
Lool that’s roddy rich 😂
It's a flip of a pretty common hood saying, I'd rather be carried by 6 before I'm judged by 12
Cube!
Bussin caps in da mix
I’d rather stay home and not get involved in something I have no business in.
This is probably the most polarizing trial I've ever watched. I literally watched every day of it. It was a very interesting trial due to the politics involved... along with gun rights and everything else. It was just very riveting.
What I remember seeing is the Prosecution going out of their way to lock a 17 year old up for killing a pedophile at a riot that the Government should have stepped in and stopped.
If Kyle had gone to Prison so should the Mayors, Senators etc. have been for the Riots during 2020 were absolute lawlessness.
The last five or so minutes of this video is spot on analysis! Very level-headed and intelligent
Too many fools in too small a place.
... and too many weapons.
@@historyandhorseplaying7374 they’re not fools
My God, it's refreshing to hear someone reasonable break down the facts of this case, politics-free.
Even if the media lied about almost everything I this case for an entire year that everyone is just perfectly fine with
@@Damienn1776 Oh yeah, literally the amount of people that think Rittenhouse is Guilty is insane. The Prosecution has done more to defend Rittenhouse than actually Prosecute them.
Almost like this should have NEVER gone to court.
@@schizoidmeme5470 it doesnt help that people arent watching unedited footage and arent watching court footage.
Theres a lot of misinformation on my side of the political axis (left wing) which annoys me especially but theres also some on the right too and both sides are making irrelevent statements.
Personally i believe rittenhouse isnt guilty but there are lessons to be learned for both sides.
Can someone explain me why a 17 year old is doing in the middle of the crowd with a gun? I'm not being sarcastic. I'm genuinely asking.
Are you asking why Kyle himself would feel the need to insert himself into the situation or are you asking if it was legal for him to have the gun? I really don't know the answer to the first part. From what I can gather, he was trying to help protect his family's and other people's businesses and his community since the police were not doing it. Should he have? I personally don't think so but who am I to tell someone that they can't protect their community? The second part is easy. Wisconsin law allows 16 and 17 year olds to open carry rifles. Legally, there was nothing wrong with this action. See Wisconsin statutes 29.304 and 29.593 for proof if you would like. Again, should he have? Probably not, but he certainly had the right to do so.
My opinion is that KR wanted to play hero with some misguided idea that he was the only one who could solve the problems. Two men are dead.
Thank you for upholding the truth endlessly
Except that the teenager had direct permission from the business owner to be on the site & be useful.
i appreciate the unbiased and non-partisan view...i know this video is a few days old but id just like to point out that it was determined that kyles possession of the firearm was in fact lawful.
@@DoctorSmartyPants It's lawful for self defense.
@@DoctorSmartyPants Its lawful for 16 and 17 year olds to posses a rifle in WI. Always has been so cope harder. The law states Minors cannot posses short barreled rifles or shotguns. The law in WI doesnt state it only applies for hunting. As a matter of fact it states minors under 16 can posses a rifle for hunting with adult supervision. The prosecution literally admitted the gun was not modified to be a short barrel rifle so it wasnt illegal to posses. Thats not an obscure technicality, its the letter of the law and they knew the charge would be thrown out. 16 year olds are allowed to posses rifles and shotguns if the barrel isnt sawed off. Anyone can read the law.
@@DoctorSmartyPants It's lawful to carry the rifle wherever he is at.
@@DoctorSmartyPants Yes but Kyle is a doctor... He administered the right dose of lead to heal a severe case of pedophillia. Now the patient is on his way to "Fucking hell" hospital, where hopefully he will recieve better treatment.