For me the g minor key is an innocent key, in the contrary of c minor. Perhaps very subjective. There are many compositions in the baroque and in the classic, tragic, but also not tragic. Between Bach and Beethoven I don't know much for piano solo: Haydn sonata g minor and Beethoven sonata op.49 nr.1 are not tragic, the ending is G major. Romantic: Schumann, Brahms, yes, perhaps fateful! But tragic? And of course what you've called in this video. Beethoven Phantasy g minor: PHENOMENAL! I mean YOU, your playing and your introduction! ⚡️⚡️ From 31:56 to 33.20 running in nothing, and then ... a wunder! B major! 💙💜 27:29 Your fans must hear the live concert! Now Bach prelude and fugue g minor. This is the ONE time of 24 from wtc I that I say: It's not my Bach. And now my comment from May 2021: After your FLAWLESS presentation of wtc II (last one Ab), I dare to say WHY. For me this is too romantic, too much agogic, and speziell in the prelude too much expression. Perhaps it was a pedagogic reason for playing so. I like mathematical structure, and the tones should speak for itself. Of course, here are not the big lines of wtc II. But now I am convinced you understand exactly what I mean. 10:08
For me the g minor key is an innocent key, in the contrary of c minor. Perhaps very subjective. There are many compositions in the baroque and in the classic, tragic, but also not tragic. Between Bach and Beethoven I don't know much for piano solo: Haydn sonata g minor and Beethoven sonata op.49 nr.1 are not tragic, the ending is G major. Romantic: Schumann, Brahms, yes, perhaps fateful! But tragic? And of course what you've called in this video.
Beethoven Phantasy g minor: PHENOMENAL! I mean YOU, your playing and your introduction! ⚡️⚡️ From 31:56 to 33.20 running in nothing, and then ... a wunder! B major! 💙💜 27:29 Your fans must hear the live concert!
Now Bach prelude and fugue g minor. This is the ONE time of 24 from wtc I that I say: It's not my Bach. And now my comment from May 2021: After your FLAWLESS presentation of wtc II (last one Ab), I dare to say WHY. For me this is too romantic, too much agogic, and speziell in the prelude too much expression. Perhaps it was a pedagogic reason for playing so. I like mathematical structure, and the tones should speak for itself. Of course, here are not the big lines of wtc II. But now I am convinced you understand exactly what I mean. 10:08