@@geoffwheeler6602 Ahh yes I remember! Sorry if I was a bit quiet that day I was a little shy, I'm not used to anyone recognising me 😂😂😂 Great news on the SC Trainer!
Very good comparison vid and your comment on the person's weight is also very relevant to the ride and something many shoetubers don't bother to mention.... let's say I'm 72 kilos which is relatively light......but most runners you see at marathons and park runs are indeed on average 10kg heavier...so it's like running whilst carrying two 5 kilogram weights in each hand...which will compress the foam a lot more.....my take is the heavier runners need to lay off the squishy stuff if they want to reduce their times.
Very much a long run and easy day shoe, which is it’s in intended purpose. As runners when we rant about how the v1 and v2 are good race day options the brand listens to that. They don’t want us racing in anything but the shoes they label as race day shoes.
Just got back from doing 15km moderate run in the SC Trainer V3, I have a Greek shape foot and my second toe (longest) is in a lot of pain, the shoes are definitely not too short as I normally allow a bit of extra room and this is also evidenced by the insole. The problem is there is barely any cushioning between the carbon plate and your foot, so the carbon plate is quite prevalent right through but especially at the toes. I’m not sure whether I could add extra padding of if I should just sell them now.
I use Superblast for long runs - is Superblast 2 worth the upgrade? Also,, can SC Elite V4 be better for long runs? I am talking 15-30km runs at cca 05:00/km pace. thanks,
@@henya2409 there isn't much between the Superblast models...very similar. I honestly prefer the SC Elite v4 over all these shoes for a long run shoe. Lighter, softer, more bounce and most of all more fun. I do my long runs at about the same pace as you also. I'm a pretty light guy so I don't get much bounce out of either Superblast. If you like a softer ride then the Elite v4 is worth a shot.
@@run-are 🙏Many thanks. I watch A LOT of running shoe content and I'm very familiar with all the main channels and runners and it is safe to say that your reviews and feedbacks are up with the very best. Thanks a lot for your work - greetings from Hungary, Europe! 👊
Good video, I've loved the SC Trainer V1 for my long runs and recovery days. I wonder, between the SC Trainer V2 and V3, which one is more resemble to the V1? (ride sensation wise)
@@adr673 I don't think either resembles the V1 which is a bit of a shame. The foam only in the V3 is probably a little closer but the rocker is totally different. Although I haven't run in it yet, I think the ASICS Glideride Max may be a ride similar to the SC Trainer V1 🤞🏽
@@adr673 have you checked out the Mizuno Neo Vista? The foam in that one is similar to the V1. Rocker is a little different but it works better for me than the SCv1
@@run-are ever since its launch, the Neo Vista has been on my radar, I'll give it a try if I can get it in my country (Mizuno has no part in the chilean market since 2012 I guess). I can get it on my trips though!
LMAO ok buddy, over 90% of runners are heel strikers whether they want to believe it or not. Have you had run mapping done or are you just assuming because you think you are a bad ass? You do realize striking with heel or midfoot or forefront doesn't matter, what matters is form and follow through.
@@johnsonch7292 the Neo Vista is best on the market in my opinion. Softer, more bounce, more energy return, smoother, more efficient, more versatile just not as durable as the Superblast. I have run a half marathon in it at tempo pace and it was also amazing. Bootie upper looks a bit weird but it's very effective for my foot. It probably feels a bit strange to walk in because of the heel bevel.
![Baby Kia - GLOVES & DRACS (BLACK AF1s) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ajm8LeB0qQk/mqdefault.jpg)
The comparison video I've been waiting for.
@@yangavava7216 hopefully you got the info you needed?
Nice comparison video! Looking forward for more. Kudos!
@@gabrielllacuna3047 thanks!
Scored the SC trainer on special at Rebel loving it so far, good to see you at the Adidas DFO store in Brisbane!
@@geoffwheeler6602 Ahh yes I remember! Sorry if I was a bit quiet that day I was a little shy, I'm not used to anyone recognising me 😂😂😂 Great news on the SC Trainer!
@@run-are All good mate, gotta have that family time!
Very good comparison vid and your comment on the person's weight is also very relevant to the ride and something many shoetubers don't bother to mention.... let's say I'm 72 kilos which is relatively light......but most runners you see at marathons and park runs are indeed on average 10kg heavier...so it's like running whilst carrying two 5 kilogram weights in each hand...which will compress the foam a lot more.....my take is the heavier runners need to lay off the squishy stuff if they want to reduce their times.
@@user-bx6zm5gj8g Yep, nailed it. The ride is very much influenced by the runner's weight. Thanks for your comment.
So in saying that would the superblast 2s be better? ( I'm 5.9 and weigh 85kg)
@@coffeemuncher01 ...I would say so....stiffer and stable so you should get a very comfortable ride at 85kg.
ASICS needs to bring more 2e shoes to Australia!
And to the US!
Superblast!!
I have hips issues so I think I’ll go with lower drop. Thanks for the video.
@@fredskinner4657 thanks for the comment
then maybe Glideride Max? Balos?
SC trainer 3 sounds like a recovery shoe with the slow rebound..
@@i.p2088 That's my feeling, nice and comfy for plodding along.
Very much a long run and easy day shoe, which is it’s in intended purpose. As runners when we rant about how the v1 and v2 are good race day options the brand listens to that. They don’t want us racing in anything but the shoes they label as race day shoes.
Just got back from doing 15km moderate run in the SC Trainer V3, I have a Greek shape foot and my second toe (longest) is in a lot of pain, the shoes are definitely not too short as I normally allow a bit of extra room and this is also evidenced by the insole. The problem is there is barely any cushioning between the carbon plate and your foot, so the carbon plate is quite prevalent right through but especially at the toes. I’m not sure whether I could add extra padding of if I should just sell them now.
@@MrBrettStar Was that your first run in them?
Hello bro ... Can you help me which shoe springy bouncy cushion puma magmax or sc trainer v3
Magmax has more bounce, the SC Trainer is softer.
I use Superblast for long runs - is Superblast 2 worth the upgrade? Also,, can SC Elite V4 be better for long runs? I am talking 15-30km runs at cca 05:00/km pace. thanks,
@@henya2409 there isn't much between the Superblast models...very similar. I honestly prefer the SC Elite v4 over all these shoes for a long run shoe. Lighter, softer, more bounce and most of all more fun. I do my long runs at about the same pace as you also. I'm a pretty light guy so I don't get much bounce out of either Superblast. If you like a softer ride then the Elite v4 is worth a shot.
@@run-are 🙏Many thanks. I watch A LOT of running shoe content and I'm very familiar with all the main channels and runners and it is safe to say that your reviews and feedbacks are up with the very best. Thanks a lot for your work - greetings from Hungary, Europe! 👊
@@henya2409 Wow Hungary!! Thanks very much for your kind words, feel free to share the channel to your running buddies.
@@run-are I will most certainly do!
Same size for the SC trainer 3 as SC Elite V4?
@@i.p2088 Pretty close
Good video, I've loved the SC Trainer V1 for my long runs and recovery days. I wonder, between the SC Trainer V2 and V3, which one is more resemble to the V1? (ride sensation wise)
@@adr673 I don't think either resembles the V1 which is a bit of a shame. The foam only in the V3 is probably a little closer but the rocker is totally different. Although I haven't run in it yet, I think the ASICS Glideride Max may be a ride similar to the SC Trainer V1 🤞🏽
@@run-are thanks! It's been tricky to find a similar shoe than SC V1
@@adr673 have you checked out the Mizuno Neo Vista? The foam in that one is similar to the V1. Rocker is a little different but it works better for me than the SCv1
@@run-are ever since its launch, the Neo Vista has been on my radar, I'll give it a try if I can get it in my country (Mizuno has no part in the chilean market since 2012 I guess). I can get it on my trips though!
Seems like shoes for heel strikers! Not for me...
@@tigerbalm666 thanks for the comment
LMAO ok buddy, over 90% of runners are heel strikers whether they want to believe it or not. Have you had run mapping done or are you just assuming because you think you are a bad ass? You do realize striking with heel or midfoot or forefront doesn't matter, what matters is form and follow through.
The SC trainer 3 costs like the SC Elite V4..
@@i.p2088 in Oz yes only $30 difference 🤯
Superblast way more bouncy and responsive
@@geridsyanriyulius9696 thanks for the comment
Can you say alot more when put neo Vista in the comparison? Ride / feel / foam / very slow run / walking / half marathon / upper. Thank you.
@@johnsonch7292 the Neo Vista is best on the market in my opinion. Softer, more bounce, more energy return, smoother, more efficient, more versatile just not as durable as the Superblast. I have run a half marathon in it at tempo pace and it was also amazing. Bootie upper looks a bit weird but it's very effective for my foot. It probably feels a bit strange to walk in because of the heel bevel.