How Fast is the Ecoboost Mustang 2.3L Premium [310HP] | Acceleration Test Review
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 авг 2024
- In 2018, Ford refreshed the V8 powered GT and bumped the power to 460HP. But for the 4-cylinder Ecoboost model, they kept the horsepower the same and increased the torque to 350 lb-ft. They also added an all-new 10-speed automatic transmission. On paper, a 2.3L Ecoboost Mustang should be in the same league as some other economy sports cars. Let’s find out.
All test runs were performed on 93 octane.
Subscribe and ring the bell to be notified of new episodes! bit.ly/trackdaytv
Want to race or get your car featured? Shoot us a message!
Instagram - / trackdaytv
Facebook - / trackdaytv
For business/all other inquiries, get in touch with us via email in the About section on our channel.
What I use to shoot the videos:
Panasonic Lumix GH5S amzn.to/2zs3QNK
Sony RX0 II amzn.to/3eNFoqh
GoPro HERO7 amzn.to/3aBUmMM
GoPro HERO5 amzn.to/2VYtmll
DJI Osmo Action amzn.to/2yFoIki
DJI Mavic 2 Pro amzn.to/3bDJDmd
What I use to log my performance times:
Dragy amzn.to/2W5Va7E
VBOX amzn.to/2W1PRWy
Music:
Description - / ncmepicmusic
Music by Ender Guney
About using the music - Müzik Kullanım Hakkında
Important Notes - Önemli Notlar
Link to Track - • Video
Legal disclaimer: This video is a cinematic recreation to provide factual information and entertainment. All local speed and traffic laws were obeyed during the filming and production of this video. Any display of speed or racing was either performed at a local race track, on a closed course, or reenacted legally for the purposes of filming the episode.
#Ecoboost #Mustang #Ford
Finally got the chance to rent a 2019 ecoboost from enterprise, absolutely loved it.
I was shocked how loud the turbos are, especially in sport mode. The torque is pretty wild for a little 4 cylinder, will startle most people who aren’t used to driving fast cars. The gas peddle was way to sensitive imo, I put my big toe down a little bit and I’m already at 48 mph.
This car is pretty fun as hell
Yea in sport or higher the car keeps you in boost so all the torque hits as soon as you touch it
the cinematography in your videos are insane!
Thank you very much, sir 👍🏻
I know!!!!.... You are setting a new standard!!! Love it!!!
This video has a strange feel to it and I can’t figure out why.
No eye contact with the camera?
overly dramatic
Lml
like a movie
His voice 😂😂😂
That voice....soooo dramatic.
That’s the point
Awesome, thanks for this bonus Monday episode. Starts my week off right 👍🏿
I've been working at Ford for years. I know a lot about these EcoBoost mustangs. I thought the same thing as you, I didn't think they were fast. But then we had one come in with a manual transmission and a higher gear ratio. I took that thing for a rip and I kid you not. It felt as fast as a new 5.0, no lie. I was very impressed. And also I myself have a 89 5.0 mustang and this EcoBoost 4cyl was way faster. I am pissed off that a 4 cyl is faster than my v8 mustang.
Oh yeah, they've come a long way from being considered "your sister's" Mustang. I honestly think they are faster than the S197 Mustangs with the 4.6L V8. I'm also mildly impressed with the 10 speed gearbox, it's pretty soulless, but it bangs those shifts out pretty quick for an entry level Mustang.
Sean Pridie are they reliable? Like up to 140k miles?
It's amazing how far cars have come. Most modern economy cars can run circles around the original Mustang and I never thought you could get that much horsepower out of an I4.
An 1989 5.0 is not fast. Eagke talon tsi/mits eclipses are faster. Been there. Beat them. 4 banger turbo charged japs.
Your video is very cinematic and unique. Very chillexd lol
I like that you left the mistake of you activating paddles by accident. Most car channels seem to edit things like that out, but that's unrealistic. Even the best of the best make mistakes.
I can't wait for the gt500 to come out. Hopefully I can get my hands on one soon after haha
Thanks, of course, I also did want to display the limiter bounce. I thought it sounded pretty good for being an economy sports car. That'll probably be the next Mustang I review. I'll skip the GT350, unless someone local has one and is willing to lend it to me for a video lol.
@@SpeedLabsMotorEnvy lol I feel ya. The gt350 is definitely a different car from the GT. Hopefully you can snag one before the gt500. Then you can compare all the desired models.
First time seeing this channel and the cinematography alone is amazing, this dude is Picasso while everyone else is cave painting
Tuned mine and I'm right there with the GTs with way better fuel, intake makes it so u can hear the turbo spool as well which is super fun
Cool vid and good info, love the cinematic intro on the balcony.
Subbed for the triple A production.
Great vid and content as always. Excited for the Thursday episode!
great video
What do you use for your 40 to 100 test for device? Also I really like your videos production 👌
Thank you. I use two devices and cross verify them for the runs. Racelogic VBOX and Dragy.
@@SpeedLabsMotorEnvy thanks for your response. I've got the most unlikely fast sedan. It's a 2017 Ford Fusion Sport with a 2.7 TT. Tuned it runs 12.7 in the quarter. Don't ask about handling tho lol. I wanna try your 40-100 to see how I compare to your test results.
@@TwowheeledadventureVT That's a sleeper right there man! I didn't even realize they made a 2.7L TT Fusion. That's awesome. It's hard to tell, but if I had to guess, I'd say somewhere between 8-9 seconds in the 40-100? As for the test unit, I would say Dragy is the better bet because it's only $150 on Amazon and it pairs straight to your phone so there's no data analysis needed. It does it all for you. Let me know how it turns out! Oh and also don't forget to get the density altitude during your run!
Very informative. Now I know how fast America's most popular rental buggers are.
My 2018 Eco Premium Mustang Goes 135mph? 0-60 in about 3.2 seconds. why is this?
Oh my good lord the editing!! SUBSCRIBED
nice video, I think it is an improvement from previous videos :)
I am glad you think so!
Nice! Another treat before Thursday - awesome!
You deserve more subs, so fun to listen to your commentary, LOL
How long does that motor last? That's the real question...4s and 6s historically fall apart at 70 grand
Love my EcoBoost but I really wish the platform took a different name. Like SVO or shit... even just "Mustang Turbo"
I think the coupe (180 lbs. lighter than this vert) with a manual transmission, 93 gas and a tune would be a great cheap sports car. I'm older and have the money for fancier cars but am seriously considering one of these refreshed 18-19 ecoboosts. Unless I am going to take it to the track a lot (doubtful), I'd rather have a lighter and cheaper car than the GT which also has decent amount of torque. It would be great fun to drive.
I’m gonna get this car my dream car
Another very well made video. Always awesome! 💪
I'm confused cuz I have a 2016 Ecoboost Mustang and it hits like 135mph. Yours looked like it was limiting out at 105mph?
I have gone 145 mph in my 2015 fusion 2.0 eco turbo awd. So i hope your stang goes faster than mine. Would be pretty sad if it didn't.
@eldenwolflord You're a sad liar lmfao. They're limited way below that. Even if ur removed the electronic limiter, you can't do that with 200 horsepower lmfao.
Bro quality of your video superior keep it up
With a few mods the ecoboost mustang will gain a lot of horsepower and torque. I had a 2016 automatic ecoboost mustang. I installed a mishimoto catted downpipe, jlt cold air intake, turbosmart 10 pound wastegate actuator, Wagner intercooler, and got a dyno tune. It put out 325 horsepower to the wheels and over 400 ft pd of torque. I would cruise at 70 mph and floor the gas pedal. It would hit 120 very quickly and it would have gone lot faster. I could really feel the torque.
Agreed, I hear that FBO Ecoboost Mustangs can give the V8 GT a run for their money.
ANSWER PLEASE!!
The Gear Ratio are 3.31 or 3.55 in this video?
Don't get me wrong, it's a good car. A new platform if you will. But when an Evo boost flies by you, and you don't hear a roaring, crackling v8, just feels weird lol. I've seen some very nicely built 4 cyl stangs though and I gotta say, it's a cool platform for sure. Under 5k miles, you can snag a focus Rs for $30k. Same motor. I'd rather have that ;)
Oh yeah, I hear a full bolt on Ecoboost can be just as fast as stock V8 Mustang or even faster. But if I'm driving a Mustang, it better make some real noise, lol.
@@SpeedLabsMotorEnvy some real noise is necessary indeed lol
Don't need the noise to wake.up neighbors are attract the police
MaxSpeed I drive an Ecoboost, and actually enjoy the fact that whenever I floor it, I don’t wake up every policemen in the neighborhood. I can have fun, but stay under the radar.
Zoltan Juhasz lmao funny you bring that up. I have a mbrp race exhaust on mine and while I like how it sounds, sometimes I want to go back to stock in that way I can take off (accelerate quick) without being noticed/being too obvious ... theres deff a benefit to it lol
The depression in this vid🤣🤣
Nice video, I like the cinematic look which camera and lens are you using?
Thanks, I shoot on Panasonic GH5S with the Canon 17-35 F/2.8L
Precision turbo has a bolt on turbo for the eco boost 4 cyl along with a tune makes 520hp a 210hp gain no kidding precision says it can be bolted on in about an hour with normal hand tools.
Great review bro ...
Wow, it's not dumbed down for us Americans! Thank you
Will I don't care what the comments say I like the EcoBoost Mustangs and they can become faster than the V8 trust me I have friends who have them
Savage 96 lol never have never will be
Savage 96 they can become faster, but it requires so much work and so much money to get it faster than a 5.0 and then the limit of what you can do power wise is so limited compared to a V8. More cylinders will ALWAYS create more power, that’s just how it is.
I have a 2.0 Camaro but I know for sure these Ecoboost Mustangs are no joke. Lol kinda wish I had one instead sometimes. Especially when it comes from performance parts and warranty covered tunes. Plus you can see out of it too lmao.
I've been curious about those turbo 4 Camaro's. I guess they are pretty strict on the whole tune thing? That's how it is with the Z06 so I'm assuming that GM rule runs deep.
Track Day TV Yeah from my knowledge, basically any tune will void your warranty. So I’ll go ahead wait for that tune because I need my warranty lol
Do they play that engine note through the speakers ? Or is that actually how it sounds?
It's actually how it sounds. For the runs, I usually place a microphone by the exhaust to record that note and I predominantly use that audio. Although, I'll admit, it's still pretty soulless, sounds like a giant vacuum cleaner.
Speakers, theres videos on it and people disabled it with a fuse but theres actually not that much difference it tunes out the intake sound.
The sound comes from Fords shitty firewalls that arent insulated to reduce noise.
I'll be honest. I like the seriousness you bring to these reviews.
Is that a stock dash board? I can’t find one with that dash
Nice review. I think you should have got a little closer to the board on all the run comparisons, we could barely make them all out as they appeared kind of small on screen.
Thanks for the feedback. I agree and I'm working on replacing the whole board with something that's a little more engaging and easy to read. I think I have like two more cars and then I'm going to switch it over to the new system. But for those next two, I'll definitely include closer shots of the board.
@@SpeedLabsMotorEnvy sounds good. keep up great work!
Another nice review 👍
Thanks brother 👍🏻
I don't know why they would even have a track setting in a 4 cylinder . love you videos always feels like a movie trailer. great stuff
Thanks. It's a little silly and there's even a drag mode but it does increase the throttle response, shift points and just overall power delivery. I don't think this car has adaptive suspension though so it's worthless there.
you are the christopher nolan of car reviews 👍
I love my ecoboost 2018 i would rather have the v8 but in Belgium we pay road taxes witch are calculated on co2 emmisions. For the v8 you pay one time 10k to get it on the road and then 4k every year to drive it... so the ecoboost is a really good alternative
That's a good point. The EU road tax limits a lot of the cars that you can afford to drive. For Europe, the Ecoboost is definitely the better choice.
14k how can anyone afford to drive. I live in the U.S and in my state it's like 60ish a year by the time you factor in license fees,tags, and plates.
The 2.3T shocked me when I first got smoked by one in my VW. It’s a lot with a little motor
Yeah it's good to know where they stand now especially since they can be had at every rental car counter these days. I know not to sleep on them when I run across one in my Abarth 124.
Track Day TV yeah. Do you think the 2.3 is faster than the 3.7 V6? I heard it was. Wouldn’t be surprised honestly
Oh for sure. Even before they upped the torque to 350# last year, it was already supposed to be 0.2 sec faster than the V6 version in the 1/4 mile. That's probably why they stopped selling the V6 model as of 2018.
Track Day TV yeah. It’s more efficient anyways. These days, a naturally aspirated V6 is obsolete in most cars. More companies are moving to the efficient and quick turbocharged engines and I’m a big fan of those. The best sounding I4 turbo I’ve ever heard is from the bmw 428i, it sounds sort of a v8 in a way. Very nice low growl to a scream. It’s the N20 motor
That's interesting. I've never heard one before at WOT. I actually didn't even realize they started to put turbo 4 bangers in those BMW's until someone else mentioned it to me. BMW, you sly little guys lol.
1:58
The production reminds me of that movie The Day the Earth Stood Still.
what's the 0-60 time???
I believe around 5 sec?
I think if they do another terminator film, they should have this guy be a T-800 model.😂
The car can move faster than you can fart. Blaaaaaaa
Can that horizontal tach be changed? It's so gaudy and annoying. It's a Ford, not an S2000. Also, are those gauges only on the Premium model, or something? Most of them I've seen around town still have traditional gauges.
nice testing
Really Good and amazing video
Abarth is the law!
Haha yes 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
1:58 the way you get pulled back to your seat...I already suspect by then that it’s faster than the Spider.
But! I’m glad to see that the tuned 124 is as fast as a 310 horsepower ‘Stang. I’m sure if that 2.3L got a good tune it would break 10 seconds though.
Do you have any plans on going up to Phase 3 or 4 on your Spider with the turbo upgrade?
Hah! I'm not sure if I did that for dramatic effect or if it was actually the 350 lb-ft of torque that sent me back in my seat. In either case, I am also glad to know that if I run into one of these budget Mustangs with my 124, I can keep up or out run them in a straight line as well as mutilating them in corners. But tuned, yes that is a different animal completely at that point.
I'm pretty happy with Phase 2, but I am honestly starting to consider Phase 3. I wish EC would sponsor that project though, then I would definitely do it LOL. And what is this Phase 4? I haven't even heard of it.
Track Day TV MOS DEF! Get that sponsorship! They’d be lucky to have you.
Phase 4 = water/meth injectors + Bigger turbo and some other things.
But first I’d talk to Brett from Tork to see if they’d consider sponsoring you, remember that Tork Stage 1 is as fast if not faster than EC Phase 2 according to independent dyno results. So Tork Stage 2 with the bigger turbo and more aggressive tune might be pretty awesome. Check both options :)
One of the guys from the 124 forum live near me and he has pretty much the same car but has Tork Stage 2. We're going to get together in the spring and we'll do an acceleration video with his car and see if it can outrun my EC P2 Abarth.
Track Day TV If it really is Tork Stage 2, then it will. Looking forward to that video and your observations. His is probably a manual though, right? If so, would be nice to measure 4th (or 5th) gear pulls from down in the rev range all the way to 6,500 (for example 60-100mph), so that shifting is not a factor (to see which tune is quicker in the same gear).
Track Day TV But if you say he has the same car as you and is automatic, then go crazy lol. Looking forward to those results!
In the first run, you started at 40 MPH. However, in the second you were accelerating past 40 MPH. How exactly do you start and measure these tests? If not from a stop in order to remove the launch variable (as mentioned in your rebirth video), don't you also have a pseudo-launch variable at 40 MPH?
I appreciate your clarification. Thanks!
Hm, that's weird. I thought that the video showed me going WOT starting from around 20-30MPH in both runs. In either case, despite what the video may show, I always start test runs about 10MPH before the test range so that there is no human "launch" error on going WOT at the start speed. Basically, I use two different GPS timing devices, Racelogic VBOX and a Dragy, to get two sets of times to cross-verify each other. They collect the data from the set ranges that I input (40 to 100MPH in this case) and then I proceed to gather local density altitude data during the run because that is important to correct for DA to equalize the times to sea level for all the cars.
Your question is very valid though, and I do have some curious viewers that want to know exactly how my tests are done. I'm working on that video as we speak. Hope this helps explain some and let me know if there's anything you want me to further clarify in the "Testing Explained" video.
@@SpeedLabsMotorEnvy Thanks for the explanation. I look forward to your video talking about the tests. Maybe what I saw here was WOT on only one of the tests prior to 40 MPH vs all of them.
I only brought up the question on this video as I feel like it was different compared to your other videos where all the tests "seemed" to start WOT at 40 MPH. However, if I'm wrong I'm sure it will be explained in your video.
No worries...thanks for the response and I look forward to the next video!
Anytime, I always like to answer questions make sure these kind of concerns are clear. The video portion is for viewer entertainment and may just be edited to show the 40-100 range. But either way, I want to become a credible source of information on this topic so I'm trying to make sure all test runs are as scientific as possible. 👍🏻
I actually liked the 2.3 machine, it is not weak at all.
Wow for a four cylinder a lots of horse power 310
With tuning the car can easily go to 450 hp. EcoBoosts are no joke when modified.
Dude please skip the into, people are here for the car.
Nice video bro
Bro, please do the 2024 Stampede, or the Dark horse?!
You give a very B.D Wong feeling idk why
V6 is better not because Of the 10hp less than eco but because the sound is really better than a 4cyl
Ahmad .M I agree! Internally V6 is better too. Ford just chose to kill it in favour of ecoboost.
I can expect ecoboost V6 will replace the V8 soon enough on s650. The Germans have done it, Americans will follow the pursuit to Turbo engines across the lineup :)
@@brolyv5802 I would buy a v6 ecoboost because the fuel economy and power would be really efficient in this case
V6 Ecoboost would be great actually. They have one in the Ford GT Supercar and the Raptor. Sadly, no such option for Mustang.
@@SpeedLabsMotorEnvy because if they put a V6 ecoboost in the mustang the V8 sales would plummet
I have a 2017 Mustang V-6. It seems to me that mine hit 110mph a little quicker than the Ecoboost.
Lol this is way faster than a 124 abarth, also remember people don’t buy the eco boost for speed, they buy it for fun
Insanely good review!
Would love to have you on the Podcast
Totally, can you message me more details through my IG?
@@SpeedLabsMotorEnvy very cool.. wishing you a great Friday ahead!! #trackdaytv #tdtv #trackdayallday
You have an epic voice and if you were near me I'd let you try mine to see the comparison but I have a good feeling you're like in the East Coast.🤣
Thanks man! I travel quite a bit around the country, but yes I am mainly in the Northeast. I'm assuming you have an FBO Ecoboost?
@@SpeedLabsMotorEnvy I live in Cali so most likely no. I have everything that you can get from Ford performance and Shelby and a lot of suspension and chassis work. If you're not interested it's cool, but it is a night and day difference. Cheers!
I never say no to an opportunity to test different cars, that's why I started this channel. Not sure what part of California I'll be visiting next, but I have family and friends in both LA and SF. Keep in touch, best way is IG for me, and if I do head out there, I'll shoot you a message.
@@SpeedLabsMotorEnvy sure just let me know when you're near the desert. I don't have social media, but I have interesting cars. 👍
As ta la vista baby, i be back!!!
It’s the convertible and stock the worst combination for speed. Upgrade the intercooler with a big turbo and pro tune it’s a coyote killer then.
whens the movie coming out?
Edgy anime opening for the win.
That cars only 310 HP on 93 octane. It's like 275 on 87
Yes, we tested with 93 octane. Ran one full tank of 93 and then refilled again before the runs.
Good. You're one of the few eco mustang drivers/testers that knows to do this on RUclips lol. I don't know what to think of the times. These are sub 7 second 0-60 cars all day. My 16 convertible breaks into the low 6's (according to the cars own track app)
there is some timing error here. these cars consistently pull 1/4 mile times in the 13's @110/mph, and 1/8 mile runs in the high 8's to 9 flat @85 ish/mph. either you did something wrong on top of shifting far too late, or that car isn't right.
I'm not sure where you got those trap speeds. Are you referring to the V8 GT? Everything I google shows a stock Ecoboost trapping 95-97MPH in the 1/4 mile.
@@SpeedLabsMotorEnvy the 2018 ecoboost
@@joekent8526 Please show me an official report of a stock 2018 Ecoboost doing 13.xx @ 110MPH. MotorTrend has it doing 13.9 @ 97.2MPH
@@SpeedLabsMotorEnvy the 110 was actually a typo that should read @100MPH. as far as 1/8th mile times I got those from in car telemetry on test drives. You noted that this was a convertible. The review you're referring to is for the ecoboost premium as well. ecoboost premium can be purchased with a performance package that has a shorter gear ratio, comes without a spare and jack (50lbs),& 255's (instead of the 235's). You chose the heaviest version of the car @ 250lbs heavier (the review chose the 2nd at 50lbs heavier), in both cases the 2nd best ratio was chosen, both had all season radials (not the available summer tire) & neither had the available 255's. When you add all of that to very late shifting the test is just inaccurate by 10+% with this version of the car. It would be even better with the cheapest stock option available. let's be honest here how many cars on that list were tested with all seasons, with their more fuel efficient available ratio, & shifted out of the power band?
If the car recently had 87 octane in it the octane adjust ratio (OAR) would not be at the -1 needed for the PCM to allow full power which would likely be the case if the car was rented, these cars typically dyno 230hp/290tq at the wheels on 87 octane but can do 270hp and 330+tq at the wheels on 93..
Also the factory intercooler is too small and too restrictive, if the charge air temp hits 150f (and it does quite easily) the PCM will pull considerable power out of the top end.
Put an aftermarket intercooler on the car and give it a couple days with 93 in the tank for the octane adjust ratio to settle and the performance will improve drastically, cutting the factory mufflers off and replacing them with some Magnaflows can increase its character quite a bit as well.
OAR explained
www.cobbtuning.com/ford-ecoboost-and-the-octane-adjust-ratio-monitor/
Is this a movie??
👀👀👀👀👀👀👀 dammit dont you hate when traffic makes you late to the movies got damn holiday😫😫😫😫😫😫
Man now I know how it feels. Waiting in the popcorn line right now 😄
can u test GT? i want buy 2019 GT but i dont know is it good idea or not
I have already tested a 2018 Mustang GT which should be the same as a 2019, skip to the middle for acceleration testing >>> ruclips.net/video/tzpKZ4t9z3c/видео.html
If you buy one, you'll be getting a plastic oil pan and drain plug.
this is why you tuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuunnnneeeeeeeeeee
It's using a ford focus engine which i don't trust
This guy sucks....speed is not measured by 40 to a 100.whats the 0 to 60, or the 1/4 mile time...
Anything under 6 seconds 0 to 60 is reasonably quick and run the quarter in 14 seconds or less is reasonably fast for any factory stock vehicle!
Im not gonna lie. I may get one to cross country with at 29 hwy mpg.
The ecoboosts are the way to go. 3.5 hour trips on all highway i set my cruise to 60 and round trip i average 38 miles per gallon with my 2015 fusion 2.0 eco turbo awd.
Sounds like ur dragging a skate board
I think he is the T1000 .. i hope u guys got what i meant to say.. hehehe
I bought a 2018 Premium Ecoboost for 25K and I love my Mustang!!
When did you purchase it?
not this guy again lol. whoops?
Love for you to drive my 2017 SS Sedan
Manual Tremec6060
Would be dope. Where are you located?
Thing is slow until you do a stage 2
Who are you anyways????
Interesting, didnt even know there was a 2,3L Mustang.
Seems to be about as fast as a Toyota GT86 because its quite heavy. Maybe you can get your hands on one?
I honestly think a Toyota 86 may be a tad slower in the 40-100. Even if the power the weight ratio is comparable, the lack of HP will start to have more of a diminishing effect on the acceleration towards the top end. I would like to get my hands on one though. I know a few that run at my local track.
I just looked up the times, i'm not sure how accurate Toyota's times are in this case (usually they are a bit off) but the Mustang should be about 0.5 - 0.8s faster.
Nice video & idea once again btw. 👍
Andrew Yang 2020
😴 I loathe hating but this car makes me sleepy. Its for those who want all the Mustang look and nostalgia (which is very cool) but could care less whats under the hood.
I agree, this is probably my least favorite car I've driven thus far on the channel. My wife hated, my friend who helped us film this episode hated it, and of course, I hated it. IMO, a Mustang needs a V8 and a stick.
So 350 lb ft of torque is boring Ok
Add 30% ethanol, an intercooler and a tune. 400whp and 450lb-ft torque. 11 second car. An entirely different animal. Hands down the best performance for the price available.
These cars have impressive numbers for a small engine with a basic turbocharger with twin scroll technology, but for some reason it can feel disappointing owning one for some reason.
pedal commander there
Я попадал мимо более 9000 раз за свою карьеру. Я проиграл почти 300 матчей. 26 раз мне было доверено сделать решающий бросок и я промазал. Я очень часто терпел неудачи в своей жизни. Именно поэтому я преуспел.
Lol..lol... Great video man !! Love it.....lol...lol...
thid dude watched to much of the first terminator movie..........cool review tho.
The top end power on newer cars is shitterrrrr
Saddest mustang review i've seen.. the soundtrack, the tonality in his voice :D
Awesome video as always. Man I hate that eco mustang. Sounds awful like a shrieking cat and sure seemed to struggle to get up to 100
Thanks man. The Ecoboost is this love/hate kind of thing for me, sort of a necessary evil. But yeah, 100MPH seems to be where you separate the men from the boys.