This is such an impressive video on all fronts. The editing, the writing, and the idea are all amazing. I hadn't put much thought into the importance of coaches before this video but putting it into perspective like this was a really big eye opener.
I would include Mike Malone and the Denver Nuggets in the list of teams that empower their coaches. Malone took lots of heat from the fans and press for not playing MPJ (former #1 prospect) more as a rookie due to occasional poor attitude and regular bad defensive effort. MPJ eventually bought into the system and is a more complete player for it. Murray has also spoken about how much he appreciates Malone's tough coaching.
I had a whole segment talking about him and the Nuggets patience…we cut it because the Spoelstra one illustrated the point and we didn’t want to drag on (sharing this because I totally agree with you…Denver finally got healthy and the patience paid off)
I think denver also emphasizes another important feature that San antonio also shares, ie the humility of the stars. Jokic and Duncan are stars who are willing to give up the spotlight to an extent, both in terms of allowing themselves to be coached and also in terms of giving opportunities to their teammates. It’s a lot harder to buy in to a system as a role player when the star who should be the center of that system is more concerned with their own individual success than that of the team. While an organization allowing a coach to coach is important, it’s also important that the players, particularly the stars, also let that happen. The Nuggets once again illustrate this point, where if you look at the nuggets of the 2000s, you can see clearly that their main star Carmelo Anthony did not buy into the coaching of George Karl. The organization didn’t fire Karl until after Melo had already left the franchise, but his coaching wasn’t effective because of the extremely bad relationship between him and Melo. Fast forward a couple of years, and the new star of the nuggets, Nikola Jokic, is more talented than Melo, has had more individual achievements than Melo, and is more celebrated than Melo, but has the humility to let Michael Malone coach him, even when that means Malone yelling at him or keeping him out of games. I won’t say that players shouldn’t advocate for themselves or let themselves be mistreated by coaches, but trust between players and coaches is in my mind the most important thing to creating a consistently good team
Perfect time to remind the people that downplay Boogie Cousins that he BEGGED Kings management to keep Mike Malone. The job he's done in Denver is immaculate.
in football(soccer) big teams were doing what NBA teams are doing now, cycling through coaches for the most minor misstep, now there is a trend for fans trying to stay patient with a coach for at least 3/4 years bfr calling for their head, still don't know why NBA media don't understand coaches cant make systems with 1/2 off-season and continuous rotating players
@@chiragmc8374even tho I partially agree with you in your first comment I have to disagree with this second comment. a coach who already proved in the past doesnt automatically mean that he get some pass to his future team. I think Doc Rivers is a good example , the man earned respect after his title , got a documentary (on netflix?) where we can see how good his personality is but at the end of the day, people still have a negative image of him after what he did at the clippers and philly. In Football (soccer) , not many coach survived this : they get popular after coaching a modest team and get totally exposed in a different situation and I think the example of Pep Guardiola is a good evidence. He trained one of the best (if not the best) team in the football with Barcelona but got exposed at Bayern and City... until the previous season Therefore, Guardiola earned some massive respect there.
I think Sam Presti realized this in his years back in san antonio and that's why he belives so much in coach Mark Daigneault. OKC this year is playing their system almost religeously and even when the bench warmers come in, instead of chucking up shots to stand out or get the game over with, they play the system and continue to drive and kick to find open shots. The best example is the last game against the blazers, it was the 4th game in 6 days and the second game of a back to back (the previous game was an overtime game in another city less than 24H before) but the team played smart basketball and never deviated from the system leading to a blowout win shooting 60/60/100 as a team.
@@PassFirstPostthe example is not about comparing okc to the blazers but the fact it was the 4th game in 6 days for okc yet they still followed the script. It could have been any opponent
@@PassFirstPostYeah, that’s when you take the 40 point win into consideration. Plenty of talented teams don’t dismantle teams like that. Why do you think OKC are shooting better than most of the league? It’s partly better players, but also better shots.
If THE Inefficiency, on the world's premier stage for basketball, is the inability of coaches being able to establish new and innovative ways to play basketball, means there is a systemic problem in the NBA that is hindering us from finding even more inefficiencies. You're a literal basketball savant, a prophet. And I am merely a follower, subscriber if you will.
I've been enjoying watching the paradox of the Orlando Magic this season. They're very much rejecting the idea of shooting 3's at a high clip, but reverse passes are their entire offense and it leads to them having a 15th-ranked offense(held up by their #1 defense) despite having a top 3 worst 3-point shooting efficiency. Notably, it leads to many hockey assists if you look at advanced stats, though they have a lower direct assist percentage. Craziness.
I’d argue the only thing that team currently misses is a star-level offensive player. Paolo/Franz are, imo, trending that way though, so they have a BRIGHT future.
Michael you and I are 1000% aligned on this. Particularly over valued NBA franchises, superstar salaries and marketing stars over the primary form of entertainment which is “winning”. I’m an old basketball fan and a purist who enjoys the NBA but can definitely point out the inefficiencies. One inefficiency is having the team’s star pegged to shoot the winning shot usually off an iso move. The rest of the guys usually just stand around. Well done !!!
Michael may make the very reasonable argument that there is a long term path to victory by playing a certain way and hiring coaches who enforce it, but I'm going to point out that this methodology requires the wrinkled 70 year old owners of the teams to be disciplined and actually stay the coarse. If you don't understand how difficult being a disciplined shareholder is, look at practically every study on retail traders. Even with a market that trends upwards, meaning that they could just buy and hold and win, they consistently lose money because they lack discipline and they do what feels right to them. Trade. Trade. Trade. Market goes down? Sell, even though that's really not how you're supposed to play the game. Instant gratification. That new coach you hired loses a game? Completely undermine his authority and then fire him with half the season to go. There, the actual inefficiency in the (edit NBA... Well, I guess leagues with teams owned by rich old men are interchangeable.)spelled out.
I’m a really new NBA fan who started watching this season and I must say the way you analyze and explain is extremely well done! I honestly believe you’re one of the best NBA channels out there! Love your vids keep it up!
It's also just so much easier to fire an HC after bad performances than for an owner/GM to look in the mirror and adjust their team building aspect or for the owner to just straight up fire their GM. And if ''it might upset potential stars'' when you have an HC with a strong identity and playstyle, than I am on the boat you don't want that player in the first place if your goal is to ultimately win a championship. Those types of players don't lead to winning, because of them making secondary aspects (personal stats and success) their primary goal.
The nets a couple years ago are a perfect example. Not only did they fire the HC (twice), they made it a point to give their stars ANYTHING they wanted. Fast forward 18 months and all three were traded
Who are you?! This video just pops up and it is practically perfect in every way! Sharp commentary, sharp concepts, sharp shooting....the composition and scene changes I mean. As a fellow sports nerd, I love the how the video created a feeling that there is something hiding there in the numbers, the stats, the draft boards, the leagues...there is something hiding there that can teach you something, open new doors, answer a question or solve a problem. Just excellent all around! Even the somewhat throw-away line (in the scope of the video) about the infinite complexity in an infinite universe is beautiful. (And a concept I'd argued in the past with my more determinism-minded friends.) Framing it all with the chaos pendulum and a data analytics hashtag...perfect video for me and a new follow of course.
My hometown basketball team CSKA Moscow used to play in Euroleague so it was what I watched when I was growing up, and back then, very many teams had really explosive coaches that aren't afraid to bench their best player or scream at the entire team or make them run during practice. When my family moved to US, I noticed that NBA coaches seemed more like mentors than coaches. They very rarely get angry with any player on team, let alone the star player, and I think that is reflected in the amount of energy the players play with on an average regular season game. I would really love for a coach like Zeljko Obradovic get a chance in NBA and see if that kind of coach can work with the pampered NBA players.
I see your point. For me I always performed better under chilled intelligent hands down coach, boss, leader. I tend to build walls on demanding people, becoming self destructive. To each it's own.
@@FirefighterBobby I don't think a coach should always be a screaming guy, but I feel like not many NBA coaches are good at motivating players when they are out of focus or not trying their hardest. You only see a few coaches like that like Popovich or Carlisle or maybe Thibs. For me someone screaming at me once every so often gets me out of my own head and helps me listen and refocus myself. In my hockey team our coach only screamed when it was very important and it would always reset our minds.
How do you still have less than 30k subscribers? That is criminal. You deserve much, much more. Your videos are excellent and so, so much better than a bunch of other content creators, particularly in the NBA / Basketball field. Keep it up!
@@michaelmackelvie Agreed. I am not a general fan of American sports, yet your storytelling is great enough for me to follow along and the video production is very high. Subbing for that reason alone because we need more creators like you.
3:51 to add here, Serbia being such a small country, we could be having an extra motivation making our players fight harder having more to prove, pride plays a big role, not every player will feel pride in the same way, and the country as big as USA needs something to prove, but then again, we all do Very interesting video, I really enjoyed this
I feel like another point that lets coaches coach that wasn't brought up here is having your superstar being receptive to coaching; taking critique and playing within the system. that willingness spreads throughout the team. it's easy to get players to follow along when the franchise mega star is helping lead the way. makes you think "well if hes willing to get yelled at there has to be some credence to what the coach is saying". I feel teams like the spurs, warriors, and now nuggets benefit heavily from this; and it's why a lot of super teams in my opinion tend to fall way behind expectations. famously brooklyn nets with kyrie stating and im paraphrasing here that the players can coach depending on whos popping off that day.
Gregg Popovich ran the whole thing in San Antonio The Holt family gave him a mandate to do well on court and turn a profit The constrains made the team creative
Allow me to summarize: NBA players egos create an inefficiency so great that even not as talented or physically gifted players can exploit through a sacrificial coaching system.
Rather than talent and physical gifts (that when referenced in the context of already being at the table of playing pro ball, mean VERY little) I think a better way of saying it would be: sacrificial coaching systems are SO important that if you ignore them, lesser SKILLED players can use it to be BETTER players by being better in that moment.
@blowc1612 Tim Duncan, Steph Curry, Giannis, Kawhi, Dirk... Are you sure big egos have won the most championships? Those players all played within their coaches' systems. Even LeBron, as big as his ego is, is a pass-first player, and understood he had to get his other teammates involved to win. The point is, star players have to sacrifice if they want to win. You rarely can have your cake and eat it too.
My dude, you are undoubtedly the single best bball content creator on RUclips. The presentation, the analysis, the humor, it's all impeccable. I only wish I'd found you sooner, but I am 100% going to be watching every single video you put out from here out.
My only suggestion is the take what your analytics data is pretty clearly showing you, and focus exclusively on basketball related content going forward. The algorithm really wants creators to focus on a specific niche, and I think you've found yours.
Absolutely love your videos, you're a very talented thinker and an even better storyteller. I wish sports were covered like this at least 10% of the time and we'd find this more entertaining as a species than any of the screaming pundits on tv!
Tackling enduring questions is a lost art that you are refreshingly in touch with. We love sports because they mirror life. We can address existential questions in a less-threatening context where biases are generally less grave, thereby less polarizing, and therefore less menacing. Hopefully this allows us to slow down, set our egos aside, and face reality with greater courage and greater clarity. Attaining this on RUclips's platform is evidence of mastery in your chosen medium. Keep it up.
Thank you! Brilliantly articulated! I commented on your previous basketball video and I had a feeling these were the other parts of the game you were leaning towards discussing. Thank you for putting it into more elegant explanation than I ever could. I find the coaching portion is a problem in many leagues and it’s just exacerbated in the NBA due to the “star power”. Understanding these concepts must be why I’ve always had a dream to run a sports franchise yet I was born into the social class without generational billions.
One of the key things in Moneyball was that you can't moneyball the playoffs. Mike Budenholzer did what you can do; win as many games as you can in the regular season.
Yeah, the playoffs is too variable. Teams get hot or cold, injuries can make or break, but I think coaching and discipline is one of those things that matters more in the playoffs. Being able to read the players, call timeouts, draw up plays. But even then, players gotta play.
About coaching. Same problem in football-soccer now. Players have too much power and its easier for team managment to fire coach then to put player (or players) in his place.
I was always fascinated about strategy in many different fields: board games, finance, sports and others. Thanks for your videos, your channels is a gem for me!
Suprising not to even mention the Nuggets in this video. They are the most emblematic team of so many of these concepts in the current NBA. Otherwise, I loved the video. High quality content!
Ettore Messina, great Italian basketball coach, was a consultant in LAL during 2011-12 season. It was the era of Kobe Bryant's reign in the team. Once Messina mentioned his experience of working with Kobe: "You don't coach Kobe Bryant. You stay in the gym with Kobe Bryant. Which is different." This statement already says a lot. Messina also stated this (paraphrase): "What can I say to a player who comes to training by helicopter?" Coach can't be coach if a player is bigger than a team. When player overgrows the team, when he becomes the greatest value of the franchise, then is up to that player to recognize and accept importance of coach and to give support to coach's authority. If not, there is no more team. And in collective sport such bunch is losing. That's all.
Just discovered the channel and watched a couple of your videos. This is the best basketball channel I’ve ever watched. Love the rhythm and the concept of your videos. Keep up the great work my brother !
9:25 But 3s were also riskier and asked for more technique than simply using size and focusing on height, and due to that people will still prioritize the paint over 3s, peak gsw used the shot threat to dominate under the basket. You also see that the body type of the player had to completely change to accomodate what was in essence a new game, and took a loooong time to people fully understand the impact of 3s that was exploited by gsw - spurs, suns, Miller (and apparently a brazilian national team) had to come before.
Hey! Just watched the previous video to this one and now on this one… gotta say wow they are awesome! I commented last video too and I was going to mention Greg PoppV. As it pertains to Steve Kerr and a different mindset of playing basketball, hence how the Spurs are well known at least in my hometown as “the ball movement team” along with the warriors really. Awesome videos, you use stats but also a different perspective to view and shine light on topics pertaining to “less efficient North American Basketball”
this is a very well made video i enjoyed it a lot i'm looking forward for more from you i agree about the 'letting the coach do his job' point and i enjoyed how you analyzed and presented your points stay healthy ♥
This is one of the most entertaining, tasteful and insightful analysis I've ever seen. I am especially happy with its conclusion on the importance of coaches. Hats off to you, good sir! Greetings from Hungary!
Halfway through, but I love your take on this. Highly appreciated. Edit: Really well done, subscribed. This is really a kind of sports channel that was needed, thanks!
I think of basketball as a sport of three variables: Where the ball is, where the players are and the player's momentum. Moving the basketball and off ball alows you to exploit all three of those in the best way possible
3:48 I'm only a few mins. in, Michael, and I'm enjoying this so much already. (Update: Finished... it was _terrific.) I'm also a proofreader, and my humble way of offering back is to suggest (often unsolicited) potential improvement points. Here, I believe it would be more accurate to say *"fewer* people" (vs. "less people"). This is because we usually use _less_ with uncountable nouns. We use _fewer_ with plural nouns. Than you for this great piece... truly looking forward to more! 👊
I like the direction this channel is headed into but I would love more critical analysis of better stats. I feel like boiling down higher points per possession or points off assists into ‘better offence’ is definitely over simplifying it. Do more passes, or as you call it, reversals really lead to better offence? Are all passes made equal? How important is pass placement? How real is player gravity? There are so many questions that really bring together how great an offence is. More reversals seem to apply some form of equal opportunity offence. Yet the best teams have very clear ‘stars’ that bear significant offensive load. The warriors, nuggets, pacers, kings. So many interesting offensive systems with so many interesting properties. It would also be really interesting to find out what NBA teams are doing with their data. With hundreds of millions of dollars on the line, I am sure that teams are paying top dollar for key analysts and members of staff. I would love yo find out what the cutting edge of basketball analytics actually looks like.
As you said no not all passes are made equal. The statement was that a specific type of pass called a reversal was missing from the two North American teams and this negatively impacted their ability to win. A reversal is a pass that changes the strong side or side with the ball from one side of the court to the other. This opens up more defensive gaps / scrambles /and ensuing mistakes and scoring opportunities. You should watch his earlier video for more details.
@@jasonwinthrop6235I saw the previous video. I know what a reversal is. When I posed questions like ‘Are all passes made equal’ I was not searching for answers. The answer to that is trivial. Of course it is no. I posed those questions as things that can be looked into deeper. Reversals are just swing passes. But similarly, not all swing passes are made equal. If Anthony Edwards makes a swing pass to the corner after a ball screen and drive collapses the defence. How does that improve the possession’s shot quality? Compare that to a Pat Connaughton pick and pop with Brook Lopez. That could technically result in a swing pass but the players are wildly different. The play is wildly different. Can we break these down into key metrics? Does Edwards rim percentage encourage defences to collapse more aggressively? After the kick out to the corner should the player swing pass again for the close out? I was just saying that there is a whole world of complexity to explore. Its all theoretical and situational but is there a way to break it down? How can we understand the moving parts and really figure out where the inefficiencies in modern nba playcalling are.
@@jasonwinthrop6235 NOTE: this is an opinion and I am open to discussion and being wrong Just to throw more questions out there into the internet void. I dont think all reversals are valuable. For example the current San Antonio team in my opinion is an example of pointless reversals. Static off ball movement and slow, choreographed half court offence. Sure they make many passes and try to move the ball. But the team lacks the spontaneity in playmaking that makes them unpredictable. That forces defenses to actually collapse and play off script. The kind of offence that makes teams like the Nuggets, Pacers, Kings, and warriors click. The spurs have really poor offensive possessions despite making many ‘reversals’. Why is that so? Are their players just inefficient? How can that be improved? How about the warriors? They embody intense off ball movement and fluid passing motions. Yet they are prone to making many turnovers. Why is that? Is there a point of diminishing returns where the accumulated risk of each pass trumps the resulting increase in shooting efficiency? Or is that over simplifying it? Many cool questions to ask
I agree that a lot of the coaches you mentioned were fired unfairly- Monty and Vogel were both good coaches that got kicked because of the points you mentioned. However, I think it’s important to realize that some of the coaches were also just not good coaches for their teams. I firmly believe that Bud simply is not a championship level coach and just had a really good team. His playoff track record is iffy outside of the championship (note: hawks) and he makes so many questionable decisions in these intense situations, even messing up his timeouts quite often. Additionally, Nick Nurse also was no longer a good fit for the raptors for a multitude of reasons. The team he was given was not the prototypical team that he was known to be good for and the team building in general was awful. Nurse was around for a long time before he completely lost the lockers room, which was in part due to his extreme overusage of players to little success. With the direction the raptors are moving in, I think his firing was justified and not necessarily due to the petty reasons you mentioned. (Honestly I like nurse too, our team just kinda sucks and I think he wanted to leave)
This was a fascinating video. It makes you wonder why we haven't seen more foreign coaches in the NBA, despite the openness of the league to foreign players. We may begin to see things change if the current Raptors experiment succeeds with the recent hiring of Darko Rajakovic. He's a special case because he's clearly got great people skills to manage NBA player personalities, while bringing a more European approach to ball movement.
Really liked the discussion and the data provided with all this. Hopefully it catches the eyes of those in the NBA front offices to look more systematic approaches rather than just chasing titles by firing coaches left and right. Also, great production, editing, and writing too.
I've watched most of you're videos at this point, Clearly the sports stuff gets the views, but I hope you continue to cover all kinds of topics, because all of your videos have been fantastic.
Haven't even watched a minute of the video yet, but just based off of that intro I can tell you deserve a lot more subs, I'm definitely gonna watch this later 100%
Phenomenal video Michael! Unlike anything I've seen from NBA youtubers. I see that you're making content about different topics...Do you think you'll settle on a niche or keep going like this? We've all heard the advice that it's best to stick to 1 thing but I don't wanna suggest anything, just genuinely curious. Keep up the good work
Haha good question! Leaning into sports quite a bit more…hoops/football. Just takes some time to find out what one enjoys creating I guess…thank you for the kind words, I have checked out your channel in the past, and enjoy it!
It is seriously crazy how quickly some NBA teams will move on from head coaches when the times get rough. I don’t know if Steve Nash was a good or bad coach, but neither does anyone else because he was put in a position where the team was led by 3 ego driven stars that all wanted to be the top dog and also have free reign to play how they wanted. In an interview Kyrie said pretty straight up “I want a coach that lets me do my thing,” which is a complete oxymoron, players adjust to the team not the other way around. He coached the nets for 2 lackluster seasons where the stars battled injuries and each other while the world battled Covid, and in the end he was fired to appease KD, just for KD to leave that same year anyway. It was basically a prime case of an unwinnable position for a coach and unfortunately Nash was really just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Absolutely love this kind of content. I think sports analytics is something everyone can be interested in and the way you smoothly integrated stats with opinions is spectacular!
My god your content is one of the best presented I've ever seen! reminds me of Neil halloran a bit. Love your work on sports and data in general; a lot of people analyze basketball stats in terms of performance, but such deep dives into salaries, markets, and other driving forces behind the sport is pretty novel.
Keep up the great work Coach MacKelvie. Your "small market" of subscribers is sure to grow as more and more of us buy into your system! I'm a brand new season ticket holder myself.
Please keep it up with the sports videos, I love your analytical approach to sports and how you make and curate videos. Earned a new sub, please keep making stuff like this!
I'd add Boston to the three markets you mention. Brad Stevens had a long tenure, and is still there as GM, and apart from the highly unusual Ime Udoku situation, the back office and coaching team has been remarkably stable. Also roster-wise: last year's top 8 included 5 Celtics draftees that had not played anywhere else, plus Horford, Brogdon, and Williams. They definitely have a system, and while they're not perfect, they are definitely in the "permanent contender" category.
Now you make me think, the NBA that I was used to watch had very well known coaches attached to good teams for seasons. Sloan, Phil Jackson, Brown, Carlisle, Don Nelson, Adelman. Now almost there are not well strcutured teams. They just put toguether good players and hope that work with any coach.
Wtf are you talking about, you act like coaching is not even more important today than never. In today's game you have Kerr, Daignault, Jenkins, Spolstra, Nurse, Lue who are in place for a moment and are considered as good to very good coaches, the problem is just that NBA teams and even fans judge coaches way more than before, and sometimes don't give them the time necessary, and sometimes getting rid of a bad coach like Philly did is the best thing to do and now they're way better with Nurse putting a real system for them and getting rid of Harden. The problem nowadays is patience
@@paquinraino8180 you miss the point, maybe because I dont speak english natively. Good teams had a well known coach for seasons. Now the coaches change so often than I lost the track of who Is coaching in the top teams. Except for Spoelstra and Kerr. Lue Is in His 3rd season with clippers AND hope didnt change,, Nurse Is in just His first season i hope Sixers dont drop the ball with him. I hope nuggets keep His coach even if dont win again. But I didnt try to say that the coaches are bad today.
Commenting for the algorithm, this message needs to be heard, i want to see more dynasties. Need more selfess play in the NBA, and longer lasting established teams. Shot selection and more passing that leads to open looks is everything.
Fantastic content. Thank you for the effort you put into this, not just with the production quality, but with the ideas and story you have to share. Already looking forward to your next one!
We’re seeing the results of Sam Presti believing in Mark Daigneault and giving him the time to implement his system alongside the acquisition and development of the post-KD/Westbrook roster. I think we’ll eventually witness something similar with Utah since Will Hardy came up through the ranks in Danny Ainge’s Celtics system; he likely has quite a long leash to implement a system as they rebuild that roster.
Yeah just as important in trusting a coach to implement their system and that take precedent over players, is that you have a GM that is given patience from the ownership to implement their roster philosophy and hire the right coach and so on. It starts from the top down. Spoelstra is only given the latitude and control that he has because of Pat Riley who was a coach and understand what it takes to be a championship winning coach. And Riley is only able to have complete control over the Heat organization is because ownership put their complete faith in Pat Riley. It starts with competent ownership that understands what is needed to win and that great systems create more opportunities for winning over the long haul.
They think they've solved ball every couple decades and then a generational talent comes along to prove them wrong. If a prime shaq came into the league today, the league would shift towards athletic and paint dominant big men again. If jordan came back and started shooting midrange jumpers like he did, the midrange being "inefficient" goes out the window. Kawhi showed this in the raptors championship, dominating the mid range game.
During Shaq's prime the league already 10 years into a shift towards guards off the back the Jordan success which started around the time big men peaked (in their eyes). The midrange being labeled "inefficient" was because all the inefficient, not as good as Jordan guards wanted to be MJ during the Deadball Era and nobody wanted to check the real problem which is (to this day) too much iso play. Kawhi won a title in the midrange and nobody cared....Currymania is still raging on as too many less talented players still shoot 40+ 3s.
3:49 Didn’t know Montenegro lost their independence recently. I’ll let the Kosovo issue slip, cause many do anyways. Great video!! I like how just showing a Taco Bell commercial in a basketball related video says more then a 1000 words.
Whenever you bring up the 2023 Bucks you forget a large detail, one of Budenhozer's brothers died just before Game 4 started versus the Heat. Definitely had a large negative factor on the mental aspect of the team.
Awesome video. You could also implement the clip of the German headcoach at this year's world championship where he went head to head with Dennis Schröder. Just another example where the coaches idea on how to win a game is more important than the antic's of a star player.
Having a good coach helps. But having a top5 player is way more important. Look at the last 40 champions. At least 37 of them had a top5 player on the team. Jokic, Steph, Giannis, KD, Lebron, Duncan, Shaq, Wade, Kobe, Jordan, Magic, Bird.
This is such an impressive video on all fronts. The editing, the writing, and the idea are all amazing. I hadn't put much thought into the importance of coaches before this video but putting it into perspective like this was a really big eye opener.
thank you! means a lot...we work hard to make it a fun experience rather than just a script/info.
@@michaelmackelvie No problem, you certainly succeeded in that endeavor
Bro, I was going to write nearly exactly that! LOL! First comment! You saved me the trouble, so I'll just say "+1."
Yuuuup. I feel like basketball just brings out the best in all aspects. Great video
Ml l
I would include Mike Malone and the Denver Nuggets in the list of teams that empower their coaches. Malone took lots of heat from the fans and press for not playing MPJ (former #1 prospect) more as a rookie due to occasional poor attitude and regular bad defensive effort. MPJ eventually bought into the system and is a more complete player for it. Murray has also spoken about how much he appreciates Malone's tough coaching.
I had a whole segment talking about him and the Nuggets patience…we cut it because the Spoelstra one illustrated the point and we didn’t want to drag on (sharing this because I totally agree with you…Denver finally got healthy and the patience paid off)
@@michaelmackelvie very true! Appreciate the reply!
of course, comments help me understand what folks take away...I am all but one perspective@@eriktorkelson2630
I think denver also emphasizes another important feature that San antonio also shares, ie the humility of the stars. Jokic and Duncan are stars who are willing to give up the spotlight to an extent, both in terms of allowing themselves to be coached and also in terms of giving opportunities to their teammates. It’s a lot harder to buy in to a system as a role player when the star who should be the center of that system is more concerned with their own individual success than that of the team. While an organization allowing a coach to coach is important, it’s also important that the players, particularly the stars, also let that happen.
The Nuggets once again illustrate this point, where if you look at the nuggets of the 2000s, you can see clearly that their main star Carmelo Anthony did not buy into the coaching of George Karl. The organization didn’t fire Karl until after Melo had already left the franchise, but his coaching wasn’t effective because of the extremely bad relationship between him and Melo.
Fast forward a couple of years, and the new star of the nuggets, Nikola Jokic, is more talented than Melo, has had more individual achievements than Melo, and is more celebrated than Melo, but has the humility to let Michael Malone coach him, even when that means Malone yelling at him or keeping him out of games. I won’t say that players shouldn’t advocate for themselves or let themselves be mistreated by coaches, but trust between players and coaches is in my mind the most important thing to creating a consistently good team
Perfect time to remind the people that downplay Boogie Cousins that he BEGGED Kings management to keep Mike Malone. The job he's done in Denver is immaculate.
in football(soccer) big teams were doing what NBA teams are doing now, cycling through coaches for the most minor misstep, now there is a trend for fans trying to stay patient with a coach for at least 3/4 years bfr calling for their head, still don't know why NBA media don't understand coaches cant make systems with 1/2 off-season and continuous rotating players
are you suggesting that coaches shouldn't be fired after pre-season losses?
@@inazuma3gou more like coaches , who have shown some competence in the past should be given time , Atleast 2/3 years to develop systems
What are we doing anymore as a whole
@@chiragmc8374even tho I partially agree with you in your first comment I have to disagree with this second comment.
a coach who already proved in the past doesnt automatically mean that he get some pass to his future team.
I think Doc Rivers is a good example , the man earned respect after his title , got a documentary (on netflix?) where we can see how good his personality is but at the end of the day, people still have a negative image of him after what he did at the clippers and philly.
In Football (soccer) , not many coach survived this : they get popular after coaching a modest team and get totally exposed in a different situation and I think the example of Pep Guardiola is a good evidence.
He trained one of the best (if not the best) team in the football with Barcelona but got exposed at Bayern and City... until the previous season
Therefore, Guardiola earned some massive respect there.
@@Criminelsoyeuxguardiola got exposed at man city??? what are you halucinating, dude, are you even following football?
I think Sam Presti realized this in his years back in san antonio and that's why he belives so much in coach Mark Daigneault. OKC this year is playing their system almost religeously and even when the bench warmers come in, instead of chucking up shots to stand out or get the game over with, they play the system and continue to drive and kick to find open shots. The best example is the last game against the blazers, it was the 4th game in 6 days and the second game of a back to back (the previous game was an overtime game in another city less than 24H before) but the team played smart basketball and never deviated from the system leading to a blowout win shooting 60/60/100 as a team.
100%, was looking for this comment!
He did the same thing with Donovan, gave him years to implement a system and didn’t rush it.
Best GM
Good point, bad example. OKC have a very clear talent advantage over the Blazers. But they do have an efficient system.
@@PassFirstPostthe example is not about comparing okc to the blazers but the fact it was the 4th game in 6 days for okc yet they still followed the script. It could have been any opponent
@@PassFirstPostYeah, that’s when you take the 40 point win into consideration.
Plenty of talented teams don’t dismantle teams like that. Why do you think OKC are shooting better than most of the league? It’s partly better players, but also better shots.
If THE Inefficiency, on the world's premier stage for basketball, is the inability of coaches being able to establish new and innovative ways to play basketball, means there is a systemic problem in the NBA that is hindering us from finding even more inefficiencies. You're a literal basketball savant, a prophet. And I am merely a follower, subscriber if you will.
Thanks Will! It is strange…the money would suggest more franchises should let a coach, coach….
I've been enjoying watching the paradox of the Orlando Magic this season. They're very much rejecting the idea of shooting 3's at a high clip, but reverse passes are their entire offense and it leads to them having a 15th-ranked offense(held up by their #1 defense) despite having a top 3 worst 3-point shooting efficiency. Notably, it leads to many hockey assists if you look at advanced stats, though they have a lower direct assist percentage. Craziness.
I’d argue the only thing that team currently misses is a star-level offensive player. Paolo/Franz are, imo, trending that way though, so they have a BRIGHT future.
@@zeb_reynoldsI hope you’re right
Michael you and I are 1000% aligned on this. Particularly over valued NBA franchises, superstar salaries and marketing stars over the primary form of entertainment which is “winning”.
I’m an old basketball fan and a purist who enjoys the NBA but can definitely point out the inefficiencies. One inefficiency is having the team’s star pegged to shoot the winning shot usually off an iso move. The rest of the guys usually just stand around.
Well done !!!
Michael may make the very reasonable argument that there is a long term path to victory by playing a certain way and hiring coaches who enforce it, but I'm going to point out that this methodology requires the wrinkled 70 year old owners of the teams to be disciplined and actually stay the coarse. If you don't understand how difficult being a disciplined shareholder is, look at practically every study on retail traders. Even with a market that trends upwards, meaning that they could just buy and hold and win, they consistently lose money because they lack discipline and they do what feels right to them. Trade. Trade. Trade. Market goes down? Sell, even though that's really not how you're supposed to play the game. Instant gratification. That new coach you hired loses a game? Completely undermine his authority and then fire him with half the season to go.
There, the actual inefficiency in the (edit NBA... Well, I guess leagues with teams owned by rich old men are interchangeable.)spelled out.
You’re basketball content is 10/10. We need more. The basketball community needs more.
This is good shit, and I don't usually say that about RUclips NBA pundits.
I’m a really new NBA fan who started watching this season and I must say the way you analyze and explain is extremely well done! I honestly believe you’re one of the best NBA channels out there! Love your vids keep it up!
It's also just so much easier to fire an HC after bad performances than for an owner/GM to look in the mirror and adjust their team building aspect or for the owner to just straight up fire their GM.
And if ''it might upset potential stars'' when you have an HC with a strong identity and playstyle, than I am on the boat you don't want that player in the first place if your goal is to ultimately win a championship. Those types of players don't lead to winning, because of them making secondary aspects (personal stats and success) their primary goal.
The nets a couple years ago are a perfect example. Not only did they fire the HC (twice), they made it a point to give their stars ANYTHING they wanted. Fast forward 18 months and all three were traded
Already becoming one of my favorite RUclipsrs. Appreciate all the work that goes into making these
absolutely! his calm voice is helping, too.
Who are you?! This video just pops up and it is practically perfect in every way! Sharp commentary, sharp concepts, sharp shooting....the composition and scene changes I mean. As a fellow sports nerd, I love the how the video created a feeling that there is something hiding there in the numbers, the stats, the draft boards, the leagues...there is something hiding there that can teach you something, open new doors, answer a question or solve a problem. Just excellent all around!
Even the somewhat throw-away line (in the scope of the video) about the infinite complexity in an infinite universe is beautiful. (And a concept I'd argued in the past with my more determinism-minded friends.) Framing it all with the chaos pendulum and a data analytics hashtag...perfect video for me and a new follow of course.
Humble superstars allow coaches to coach . Duncan,Curry,Jokic. Great video btw,new subscriber. Keep it up! Hello from Serbia.
My hometown basketball team CSKA Moscow used to play in Euroleague so it was what I watched when I was growing up, and back then, very many teams had really explosive coaches that aren't afraid to bench their best player or scream at the entire team or make them run during practice. When my family moved to US, I noticed that NBA coaches seemed more like mentors than coaches. They very rarely get angry with any player on team, let alone the star player, and I think that is reflected in the amount of energy the players play with on an average regular season game. I would really love for a coach like Zeljko Obradovic get a chance in NBA and see if that kind of coach can work with the pampered NBA players.
I see your point. For me I always performed better under chilled intelligent hands down coach, boss, leader. I tend to build walls on demanding people, becoming self destructive. To each it's own.
@@FirefighterBobby I don't think a coach should always be a screaming guy, but I feel like not many NBA coaches are good at motivating players when they are out of focus or not trying their hardest. You only see a few coaches like that like Popovich or Carlisle or maybe Thibs.
For me someone screaming at me once every so often gets me out of my own head and helps me listen and refocus myself. In my hockey team our coach only screamed when it was very important and it would always reset our minds.
My coaches in high school were Bobby knight like nutters always angry and I didn't like it. But looking back now I appreciate them
How do you still have less than 30k subscribers? That is criminal. You deserve much, much more. Your videos are excellent and so, so much better than a bunch of other content creators, particularly in the NBA / Basketball field. Keep it up!
Thank you! I really appreciate that…we put a lot of thought/energy into each one.
@@michaelmackelvie Agreed. I am not a general fan of American sports, yet your storytelling is great enough for me to follow along and the video production is very high. Subbing for that reason alone because we need more creators like you.
Turns out the ball moves faster than the players
We tested this in the last video
the quality of these videos are insane. Only a matter of time before you blow up
Definitely. I’m amazed. If this dude makes these by himself he is insanely talented
love your videos, I really enjoy that the ideas you develop can be applied in other areas and life endeavors
That’s sports!
What is the machine on the desk called?
3:51 to add here, Serbia being such a small country, we could be having an extra motivation making our players fight harder having more to prove, pride plays a big role, not every player will feel pride in the same way, and the country as big as USA needs something to prove, but then again, we all do
Very interesting video, I really enjoyed this
this is crazy, i am so blessed to be able to watch your content
Thank you! A lot of work but these comments make a big difference…much appreciated.
I feel like another point that lets coaches coach that wasn't brought up here is having your superstar being receptive to coaching; taking critique and playing within the system. that willingness spreads throughout the team. it's easy to get players to follow along when the franchise mega star is helping lead the way. makes you think "well if hes willing to get yelled at there has to be some credence to what the coach is saying". I feel teams like the spurs, warriors, and now nuggets benefit heavily from this; and it's why a lot of super teams in my opinion tend to fall way behind expectations. famously brooklyn nets with kyrie stating and im paraphrasing here that the players can coach depending on whos popping off that day.
Gregg Popovich ran the whole thing in San Antonio
The Holt family gave him a mandate to do well on court and turn a profit
The constrains made the team creative
Allow me to summarize:
NBA players egos create an inefficiency so great that even not as talented or physically gifted players can exploit through a sacrificial coaching system.
Rather than talent and physical gifts (that when referenced in the context of already being at the table of playing pro ball, mean VERY little) I think a better way of saying it would be: sacrificial coaching systems are SO important that if you ignore them, lesser SKILLED players can use it to be BETTER players by being better in that moment.
Totally false. Look at the last 30 years. Probably 27 or 28 of those years the championship was won by a team with a top3 player in the league
WRONG
FYI the biggest egos the game have ever seen HAVE WON THE MOST. Probably Tim Duncan is the exception.
@blowc1612 Tim Duncan, Steph Curry, Giannis, Kawhi, Dirk... Are you sure big egos have won the most championships? Those players all played within their coaches' systems.
Even LeBron, as big as his ego is, is a pass-first player, and understood he had to get his other teammates involved to win. The point is, star players have to sacrifice if they want to win. You rarely can have your cake and eat it too.
Production value is stupidly good. Keep doin' what you're doin', man.
Thanks Jimmy!
My dude, you are undoubtedly the single best bball content creator on RUclips. The presentation, the analysis, the humor, it's all impeccable. I only wish I'd found you sooner, but I am 100% going to be watching every single video you put out from here out.
My only suggestion is the take what your analytics data is pretty clearly showing you, and focus exclusively on basketball related content going forward. The algorithm really wants creators to focus on a specific niche, and I think you've found yours.
Absolutely love your videos, you're a very talented thinker and an even better storyteller.
I wish sports were covered like this at least 10% of the time and we'd find this more entertaining as a species than any of the screaming pundits on tv!
Tackling enduring questions is a lost art that you are refreshingly in touch with. We love sports because they mirror life. We can address existential questions in a less-threatening context where biases are generally less grave, thereby less polarizing, and therefore less menacing. Hopefully this allows us to slow down, set our egos aside, and face reality with greater courage and greater clarity. Attaining this on RUclips's platform is evidence of mastery in your chosen medium. Keep it up.
Thank you! Brilliantly articulated! I commented on your previous basketball video and I had a feeling these were the other parts of the game you were leaning towards discussing. Thank you for putting it into more elegant explanation than I ever could. I find the coaching portion is a problem in many leagues and it’s just exacerbated in the NBA due to the “star power”. Understanding these concepts must be why I’ve always had a dream to run a sports franchise yet I was born into the social class without generational billions.
Great video! Excellent claim! Great evidence! Draymond green is the best reference when talking about efficiency.
One of the most accurate and well explained sports analytics videos I've ever seen. Great Job!!!!
I don't understand anything about basketball, but I still left this video with new knowledge. A testament to your abilities. Thanks
One of the key things in Moneyball was that you can't moneyball the playoffs. Mike Budenholzer did what you can do; win as many games as you can in the regular season.
Yeah, the playoffs is too variable. Teams get hot or cold, injuries can make or break, but I think coaching and discipline is one of those things that matters more in the playoffs. Being able to read the players, call timeouts, draw up plays. But even then, players gotta play.
About coaching. Same problem in football-soccer now. Players have too much power and its easier for team managment to fire coach then to put player (or players) in his place.
I was always fascinated about strategy in many different fields: board games, finance, sports and others. Thanks for your videos, your channels is a gem for me!
this is honestly the most fun i’ve had watching an analysis of basketball
Suprising not to even mention the Nuggets in this video. They are the most emblematic team of so many of these concepts in the current NBA. Otherwise, I loved the video. High quality content!
it's because of cost I think - Nuggets signed multiple players to max contracts and he's talking about winning more with .. LESS
A fat Serb turned out to be one of the biggest inefficiencies that the Nuggets reaped. Intelligence and skill was criminally undervalued in the NBA.
Ettore Messina, great Italian basketball coach, was a consultant in LAL during 2011-12 season. It was the era of Kobe Bryant's reign in the team.
Once Messina mentioned his experience of working with Kobe: "You don't coach Kobe Bryant. You stay in the gym with Kobe Bryant. Which is different." This statement already says a lot. Messina also stated this (paraphrase): "What can I say to a player who comes to training by helicopter?"
Coach can't be coach if a player is bigger than a team. When player overgrows the team, when he becomes the greatest value of the franchise, then is up to that player to recognize and accept importance of coach and to give support to coach's authority. If not, there is no more team. And in collective sport such bunch is losing. That's all.
Just discovered the channel and watched a couple of your videos. This is the best basketball channel I’ve ever watched. Love the rhythm and the concept of your videos. Keep up the great work my brother !
This is by far the best basketball video ive ever seen
9:25 But 3s were also riskier and asked for more technique than simply using size and focusing on height, and due to that people will still prioritize the paint over 3s, peak gsw used the shot threat to dominate under the basket. You also see that the body type of the player had to completely change to accomodate what was in essence a new game, and took a loooong time to people fully understand the impact of 3s that was exploited by gsw - spurs, suns, Miller (and apparently a brazilian national team) had to come before.
Hey! Just watched the previous video to this one and now on this one… gotta say wow they are awesome!
I commented last video too and I was going to mention Greg PoppV. As it pertains to Steve Kerr and a different mindset of playing basketball, hence how the Spurs are well known at least in my hometown as “the ball movement team” along with the warriors really. Awesome videos, you use stats but also a different perspective to view and shine light on topics pertaining to “less efficient North American Basketball”
this is a very well made video
i enjoyed it a lot
i'm looking forward for more from you
i agree about the 'letting the coach do his job' point and i enjoyed how you analyzed and presented your points
stay healthy ♥
You are absolutely right, great show, keep it up. I would like something more about Denver, about Eurolleague... Greetings from Bosnia and Serbia!
This is one of the most entertaining, tasteful and insightful analysis I've ever seen. I am especially happy with its conclusion on the importance of coaches. Hats off to you, good sir! Greetings from Hungary!
Halfway through, but I love your take on this. Highly appreciated.
Edit: Really well done, subscribed. This is really a kind of sports channel that was needed, thanks!
This is the first video of yours that I’ve watched and I don’t know how you don’t have more subscribers. Well you just earned one more!
Thank you!
Really Underrated, hope the algorithm picks this up
I think of basketball as a sport of three variables: Where the ball is, where the players are and the player's momentum.
Moving the basketball and off ball alows you to exploit all three of those in the best way possible
3:48 I'm only a few mins. in, Michael, and I'm enjoying this so much already. (Update: Finished... it was _terrific.)
I'm also a proofreader, and my humble way of offering back is to suggest (often unsolicited) potential improvement points. Here, I believe it would be more accurate to say *"fewer* people" (vs. "less people"). This is because we usually use _less_ with uncountable nouns. We use _fewer_ with plural nouns.
Than you for this great piece... truly looking forward to more! 👊
This type of content is soooo so fresh in terms of basketball and the NBA, new subscriber here!
9:39 an example of using the fundamentals of effective editing and comedic timing, you win my subscription
Denver definitely exemplifies coach empowerment and much respect for addressing and agreeing in the comments. Great video!
I like the direction this channel is headed into but I would love more critical analysis of better stats. I feel like boiling down higher points per possession or points off assists into ‘better offence’ is definitely over simplifying it.
Do more passes, or as you call it, reversals really lead to better offence? Are all passes made equal? How important is pass placement? How real is player gravity? There are so many questions that really bring together how great an offence is.
More reversals seem to apply some form of equal opportunity offence. Yet the best teams have very clear ‘stars’ that bear significant offensive load. The warriors, nuggets, pacers, kings. So many interesting offensive systems with so many interesting properties.
It would also be really interesting to find out what NBA teams are doing with their data. With hundreds of millions of dollars on the line, I am sure that teams are paying top dollar for key analysts and members of staff. I would love yo find out what the cutting edge of basketball analytics actually looks like.
As you said no not all passes are made equal. The statement was that a specific type of pass called a reversal was missing from the two North American teams and this negatively impacted their ability to win.
A reversal is a pass that changes the strong side or side with the ball from one side of the court to the other. This opens up more defensive gaps / scrambles /and ensuing mistakes and scoring opportunities. You should watch his earlier video for more details.
@@jasonwinthrop6235I saw the previous video. I know what a reversal is.
When I posed questions like ‘Are all passes made equal’ I was not searching for answers. The answer to that is trivial. Of course it is no. I posed those questions as things that can be looked into deeper.
Reversals are just swing passes. But similarly, not all swing passes are made equal. If Anthony Edwards makes a swing pass to the corner after a ball screen and drive collapses the defence. How does that improve the possession’s shot quality?
Compare that to a Pat Connaughton pick and pop with Brook Lopez. That could technically result in a swing pass but the players are wildly different. The play is wildly different.
Can we break these down into key metrics? Does Edwards rim percentage encourage defences to collapse more aggressively? After the kick out to the corner should the player swing pass again for the close out?
I was just saying that there is a whole world of complexity to explore. Its all theoretical and situational but is there a way to break it down? How can we understand the moving parts and really figure out where the inefficiencies in modern nba playcalling are.
@@jasonwinthrop6235
NOTE: this is an opinion and I am open to discussion and being wrong
Just to throw more questions out there into the internet void. I dont think all reversals are valuable. For example the current San Antonio team in my opinion is an example of pointless reversals. Static off ball movement and slow, choreographed half court offence.
Sure they make many passes and try to move the ball. But the team lacks the spontaneity in playmaking that makes them unpredictable. That forces defenses to actually collapse and play off script. The kind of offence that makes teams like the Nuggets, Pacers, Kings, and warriors click.
The spurs have really poor offensive possessions despite making many ‘reversals’. Why is that so? Are their players just inefficient? How can that be improved?
How about the warriors? They embody intense off ball movement and fluid passing motions. Yet they are prone to making many turnovers. Why is that? Is there a point of diminishing returns where the accumulated risk of each pass trumps the resulting increase in shooting efficiency? Or is that over simplifying it?
Many cool questions to ask
I can’t believe how well this is made. Hidden gem. 11/10
I agree that a lot of the coaches you mentioned were fired unfairly- Monty and Vogel were both good coaches that got kicked because of the points you mentioned. However, I think it’s important to realize that some of the coaches were also just not good coaches for their teams. I firmly believe that Bud simply is not a championship level coach and just had a really good team. His playoff track record is iffy outside of the championship (note: hawks) and he makes so many questionable decisions in these intense situations, even messing up his timeouts quite often. Additionally, Nick Nurse also was no longer a good fit for the raptors for a multitude of reasons. The team he was given was not the prototypical team that he was known to be good for and the team building in general was awful. Nurse was around for a long time before he completely lost the lockers room, which was in part due to his extreme overusage of players to little success. With the direction the raptors are moving in, I think his firing was justified and not necessarily due to the petty reasons you mentioned. (Honestly I like nurse too, our team just kinda sucks and I think he wanted to leave)
This was a fascinating video. It makes you wonder why we haven't seen more foreign coaches in the NBA, despite the openness of the league to foreign players. We may begin to see things change if the current Raptors experiment succeeds with the recent hiring of Darko Rajakovic. He's a special case because he's clearly got great people skills to manage NBA player personalities, while bringing a more European approach to ball movement.
Really liked the discussion and the data provided with all this. Hopefully it catches the eyes of those in the NBA front offices to look more systematic approaches rather than just chasing titles by firing coaches left and right. Also, great production, editing, and writing too.
I've watched most of you're videos at this point, Clearly the sports stuff gets the views, but I hope you continue to cover all kinds of topics, because all of your videos have been fantastic.
This video was something special man. It had all the ingredients from game economics to game inefficiency. 🙏
Thank you!
Haven't even watched a minute of the video yet, but just based off of that intro I can tell you deserve a lot more subs, I'm definitely gonna watch this later 100%
First video of yours that I've seen, instantly intrigued and can't wait to watch more!
Phenomenal video Michael! Unlike anything I've seen from NBA youtubers. I see that you're making content about different topics...Do you think you'll settle on a niche or keep going like this? We've all heard the advice that it's best to stick to 1 thing but I don't wanna suggest anything, just genuinely curious. Keep up the good work
Haha good question! Leaning into sports quite a bit more…hoops/football. Just takes some time to find out what one enjoys creating I guess…thank you for the kind words, I have checked out your channel in the past, and enjoy it!
Your use of facial expression and vocal tone to help guide the viewers throughout the video is amazing.
It is seriously crazy how quickly some NBA teams will move on from head coaches when the times get rough. I don’t know if Steve Nash was a good or bad coach, but neither does anyone else because he was put in a position where the team was led by 3 ego driven stars that all wanted to be the top dog and also have free reign to play how they wanted. In an interview Kyrie said pretty straight up “I want a coach that lets me do my thing,” which is a complete oxymoron, players adjust to the team not the other way around. He coached the nets for 2 lackluster seasons where the stars battled injuries and each other while the world battled Covid, and in the end he was fired to appease KD, just for KD to leave that same year anyway. It was basically a prime case of an unwinnable position for a coach and unfortunately Nash was really just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Steve Nash burner
Nash was a terrible coach. He literally has ZERO coaching experience before he got the job.
Absolutely love this kind of content. I think sports analytics is something everyone can be interested in and the way you smoothly integrated stats with opinions is spectacular!
My god your content is one of the best presented I've ever seen! reminds me of Neil halloran a bit. Love your work on sports and data in general; a lot of people analyze basketball stats in terms of performance, but such deep dives into salaries, markets, and other driving forces behind the sport is pretty novel.
This channel is outstanding. Im in awe of your editing and writing and video ideas.
This channel deserves millions of followers!
Keep up the great work Coach MacKelvie. Your "small market" of subscribers is sure to grow as more and more of us buy into your system! I'm a brand new season ticket holder myself.
Extremely high quality, educative and entertaining. Plz more basketball videos.
These just KEEP getting better. Subscribers will start coming in. Keep it up brother
Wow, this level of production for a (relatively) small audience is insane. Great work bro
This is going to be the most important breakdown for the next 20yrs of NBA play style, the league owes you a check
I don't really comment on videos but this is quite literally the best basketball video essay I have ever seen
Please keep it up with the sports videos, I love your analytical approach to sports and how you make and curate videos. Earned a new sub, please keep making stuff like this!
I'd add Boston to the three markets you mention. Brad Stevens had a long tenure, and is still there as GM, and apart from the highly unusual Ime Udoku situation, the back office and coaching team has been remarkably stable. Also roster-wise: last year's top 8 included 5 Celtics draftees that had not played anywhere else, plus Horford, Brogdon, and Williams. They definitely have a system, and while they're not perfect, they are definitely in the "permanent contender" category.
this is a great video! i love the 3>2 part as a statistical breakthrough
Well thought out, researched and produced. Informative and educational. Thank You.
Now you make me think, the NBA that I was used to watch had very well known coaches attached to good teams for seasons. Sloan, Phil Jackson, Brown, Carlisle, Don Nelson, Adelman. Now almost there are not well strcutured teams. They just put toguether good players and hope that work with any coach.
Wtf are you talking about, you act like coaching is not even more important today than never. In today's game you have Kerr, Daignault, Jenkins, Spolstra, Nurse, Lue who are in place for a moment and are considered as good to very good coaches, the problem is just that NBA teams and even fans judge coaches way more than before, and sometimes don't give them the time necessary, and sometimes getting rid of a bad coach like Philly did is the best thing to do and now they're way better with Nurse putting a real system for them and getting rid of Harden.
The problem nowadays is patience
@@paquinraino8180 you miss the point, maybe because I dont speak english natively.
Good teams had a well known coach for seasons. Now the coaches change so often than I lost the track of who Is coaching in the top teams. Except for Spoelstra and Kerr.
Lue Is in His 3rd season with clippers AND hope didnt change,, Nurse Is in just His first season i hope Sixers dont drop the ball with him. I hope nuggets keep His coach even if dont win again. But I didnt try to say that the coaches are bad today.
Commenting for the algorithm, this message needs to be heard, i want to see more dynasties. Need more selfess play in the NBA, and longer lasting established teams. Shot selection and more passing that leads to open looks is everything.
One of the best basketball videos I’ve seen in a long time, and I watch a lot!
Fantastic content. Thank you for the effort you put into this, not just with the production quality, but with the ideas and story you have to share. Already looking forward to your next one!
What an amazing video, had me hooked the entire time such high quality liked, subscribed, I have no idea you don’t have more subscribers!!!
I love the pacing of your arguments in video form. Please keep making content ❤
We’re seeing the results of Sam Presti believing in Mark Daigneault and giving him the time to implement his system alongside the acquisition and development of the post-KD/Westbrook roster. I think we’ll eventually witness something similar with Utah since Will Hardy came up through the ranks in Danny Ainge’s Celtics system; he likely has quite a long leash to implement a system as they rebuild that roster.
Yeah just as important in trusting a coach to implement their system and that take precedent over players, is that you have a GM that is given patience from the ownership to implement their roster philosophy and hire the right coach and so on. It starts from the top down.
Spoelstra is only given the latitude and control that he has because of Pat Riley who was a coach and understand what it takes to be a championship winning coach. And Riley is only able to have complete control over the Heat organization is because ownership put their complete faith in Pat Riley.
It starts with competent ownership that understands what is needed to win and that great systems create more opportunities for winning over the long haul.
OKC hasn’t even won a playoff game yet. Chill
They think they've solved ball every couple decades and then a generational talent comes along to prove them wrong.
If a prime shaq came into the league today, the league would shift towards athletic and paint dominant big men again.
If jordan came back and started shooting midrange jumpers like he did, the midrange being "inefficient" goes out the window.
Kawhi showed this in the raptors championship, dominating the mid range game.
During Shaq's prime the league already 10 years into a shift towards guards off the back the Jordan success which started around the time big men peaked (in their eyes).
The midrange being labeled "inefficient" was because all the inefficient, not as good as Jordan guards wanted to be MJ during the Deadball Era and nobody wanted to check the real problem which is (to this day) too much iso play.
Kawhi won a title in the midrange and nobody cared....Currymania is still raging on as too many less talented players still shoot 40+ 3s.
3:49 Didn’t know Montenegro lost their independence recently.
I’ll let the Kosovo issue slip, cause many do anyways.
Great video!! I like how just showing a Taco Bell commercial in a basketball related video says more then a 1000 words.
Great data, great way to talk about it, also a los of fun. Thanks
I was expecting about 500k subscriber count. You are underrated! Great content!
Cant wait to see the writing become even better and match the stellar production. THANKS for mentioning moneyball and this "lean" efficiency systen.
Great video! The diversity of your videos is admirable.
Wait wtf...Less than 30k Subscribers? With this level of production value and good content? Well that's insane. Subscribed.
Whenever you bring up the 2023 Bucks you forget a large detail, one of Budenhozer's brothers died just before Game 4 started versus the Heat. Definitely had a large negative factor on the mental aspect of the team.
Awesome video. You could also implement the clip of the German headcoach at this year's world championship where he went head to head with Dennis Schröder. Just another example where the coaches idea on how to win a game is more important than the antic's of a star player.
Fantastic information, delivery and production quality. Less than 40k subs?!
Come on folks. Lets get to it!
Well put together subbed
The quality of your videos are amazing I hope you aren't overworking yourself
Another great video! I love the format and the editing.
Incredibly high quality video, keep up the good work!
Having a good coach helps. But having a top5 player is way more important. Look at the last 40 champions. At least 37 of them had a top5 player on the team. Jokic, Steph, Giannis, KD, Lebron, Duncan, Shaq, Wade, Kobe, Jordan, Magic, Bird.