A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 дек 2012
- Análise da Fotografia Lunar -. Este vídeo convincente põe em séria dúvida a autenticidade das missões Apollo e informações características que desafia as habilidades declaradas da NASA para conseguir enviar um homem à Lua e retorná-lo em segurança à Terra Nova evidência sugere claramente que a NASA fotos fajutas supostamente tomadas na superfície lunar. Estes resultados são suportados pela análise e do testemunho de especialistas de uma grande variedade de disciplinas científicas.
The narrator lady is fantastic.
I agree
She is a liar
@@miaoyanli9044 She's clueless - like the film.
Sheeps believe they live on a ball
I wonder why not one of the Apollo Astronots ever mentioned seeing the flashes of light the other astronauts experienced?? Not once.
Special technical services for investigation of light flash phenomena, final report. 1973; March 1. NASA Contractor Report, NASA-CR-128866. [NTRS]
Chapman PK, Pinsky LS, and Benson RE. Observations of cosmic-ray induced phosphenes on Apollo 14. In: Warman EA, editor. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Natural and Manmade Radiation in Space; 1971 March 1-5; Las Vegas, Nevada.
Liwshitz M. The origin of light flashes observed by Apollo astronauts. NASA Contractor Report, NASA-CR-123173; September 30, 1971.
McNulty PJ, Pease VP, Bond VP. Role of Cerenkov Radiation in the eye Flashes Observed by Apollo Astronauts. Life Sciences and Space Research XIV, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1976.
There's no way they could have known about the light flashes in the eyes
They never left low earth orbit.
@@robertbolding4182 Why could they not have known?
truths protective layers are the van Allen belts,,
AMEN
The van Allen belts were known a decade before the first manned Apollo missions. NASA and the astronauts planned the course carefully and took a calculated risk (two astronauts died later from cancer!)
www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/SMIII_Problem7.pdf
NASA wanted to test if Orion's SYSTEMS will function, which is just as important for survival as radiation it self.
Realize how drastically electronics has evolved since the Apollo missions. It is expected the new systems will react different to the radiation, so it makes sense to do an unmanned test. The first Apollo missions were unmanned too.
Don't worry. NASA has completed the tests and Orion went through just fine.
Frankly speaking. Isn't it getting a little tiresome your Flatland, toddler level, conspiracy can only exist, based on denial, lies and deception and you constantly have to make up new nonsense on the fly?
@@hansnielsen4165 Yep, a trip through the Van Allen is calculated to be the same dose of radiation as a year working in a nuclear plant, not ideal but. worth it...
@@hansnielsen4165 They have a knack for taking bits and pieces of the documentation, adding in a dash of innuendo and label it as the truth that is being kept from us.
These people are the product of the subversion of natural selection which started when they changed crosswalk sings from walk/don't walk to pictures and don't put your head in the bag labeling.
Never mind that fact that Van Allen himself said it was safe to pass through them. What would he know, huh?
this wont come up on RUclips search anymore ...
Except that it does.
@NWAZ flatEarther are you both in the US?
also this is not the full video
Artonline - yup, in the US, but I had to rifle through the fakes that are out, apparently.
You need to scroll down quite a bit to find it
At least you can watch peacefully without adverts 😅 Heavily demoted and demonitized.
If you look at Buzz Aldren's body language when Armstrong is answering the question about stars visible from the surface, you can tell he's pissed that the question was presented. Buzz was definitely brain washed into thinking that he was an American hero. This true believer attitude came up again around his twilight years (pun intended) when he punched that guy for questioning the landing.
Robert Todd - lots of hush money and the promise of fame.
I don't think it's any of those things. More likely death threats against themselves and their families.
All they had so do too proove they didn't land on the moon they did, all the Apollo asstranaughts
_Excelente !_
I can believe it. During the conference, just after the return, they didn't appear to be very celebrative, with the world. It's van Allan's belts, that gets me every time, and if they took 3 vehicles, how did they carry all of that equipment, on that small vessel? How did they have time to put them all together, in the time frame, they had getting there, and back?
230,000 miles... There... And then back. And a day on the moon. All in 8 days. Do the math. There is no way. No fuggin way.
Nice!! It's not surprising I found a fellow FE in here! Lol, cheers!
Btw...I'm not buying the "radiation belt" explaination one bit.
I had a rather crappy day today at work.
Then I read some of the crap spewing out of the vacuums being called brains and know that my day was great compared to the hell you morons go through thinking it couldn't be done.
I'll bet you have trouble wrapping you vacuums around a Tootsie Pop too.
And what proof do you have that the Van Allen Belts exist? NASA just says they're there and you believe them without question?
I saw this video many years ago, I`m certain it was much longer and there are scenes i recall that i did`nt see in this one.
Copy it if you can and save it to flash drives, The day will come when it`s removed and any further attempts to upload it will be deleted.
No, it will forever be held up as a prime example of "conspiracy theory nonsense" ...
Yes I agree. I'm sure there was an interview with Bill Casing, more photographic evidence presented by Mr Percy (?) and the Gus Grissam lemon / burned alive.
Truly poingant to see images of horrendous suffering and inhumanity while we see the lift off sequence.
Everything that could be done to lessen the horrors of earth but instead we send three guys to the moon?
People so stupid aren't smart enough to be able to accomplish such a thing. The stupidity of the act itself proves its own falsehood. We may as well drill to the center of the earth .
The only space I've ever seen is between people's ears.
Joe Blow or legs 😍
"You know it's real because it looks so fake".~
Don't talk. You say dumb things
Recently NASA astronauts were discussing about the technology in development to go through Van Allen radiation belt, so how come they passed through in 1969.
"We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space."
ruclips.net/video/4O5dPsu66Kw/видео.html
No, they were not. In 2014, NASA systems engineer Kelly Smith (who worked on guidance systems for the new Orion spacecraft) spoke of Orion's then upcoming unmanned flight test through the VAB. The challenge was to ensure that Orion's modern systems architecture would not be damaged by particle radiation. Orion flew a month later and aced the test.
What was on the Missing Three Videos , I’m Quite Interested
If you irradiate 1/8 inch thick aluminum plate it radiates x-rays. Doesn't provide any shielding. They don't use aluminum in x-ray departments
You're talking about wave radiation not low energy protons and electrons.
Nobody likes confrontation, especially when they are the confronted.
I have a right cross and a left hook that say's confront all you want . . . I also have a jab that tells people good night and sweet dreams. ;>)
@@JoeOutdoors 🤣👌🚀🎅💅💖🎶🍻🤷♂️
Excellent ❤❤❤
41:32 I feel sadness
Joly good show! Yes that Mission took place but it they were not ready.
MUCH IS LEFT UNDONE. NASA HAS COVERED WITH PROTECTIVE LAYERS.
That is small circle, even from that 1/2 far it should be big, 4X bigger then Moon. Seen the whole round image from ISS footage, impossible!
There was a documentary, where a tool bag was dangling on the side of the Moon lander. Does anyone know what is the name of that documentary?
It's called the MESA. Modularized Equipment Stowage Assembly. And they had it on all the landers so it's going to be in any documentary that shows photo or video of the lander.
@@DeputyNordburg thanks for the explanation. By dangling, I mean rocking, back to front. When I saw that video I was a bit surprised to say the least))
@@Mr1SaS Why?
@@DeputyNordburg
Beacause it stopped rocking at some point than started again without any intervention.
@@Mr1SaS It's interesting, I have seen Apollo video of something swinging and seen claims that it proves they are on the moon, and I've seen claims that it proves they are not on the moon because of the speed of the swing. Sometimes there is math. But any math is going to require estimates of the size, and even then the "length" used in the calculation is axle to center of mass, not overall length. And of course video can be sped up or slowed down.
I have not seen a video where it stops or starts, but I will keep an eye out.
Thank you Big Bear
Guys... I'm 8 claws deep. We never went to the moon. Actually smartest thing Owen ever said. Sadly.... P.s. he fucked Dolev at Epcot. Guys I'm a wizard
@@casperhito I'll bet you have trouble wrapping your comprehensive ability around a Tootsie Pop.
@@JoeOutdoors are you a bot?
Did the cult get here, too? Do you even know what a 'bear' IS?
@@RA-ym5uf it most certainly is lol
Also there is no way they could of carried enough fuel in the Saturn 5 rocket to get anywhere near the moon.The sad truth is we didn't go.
Look for how inertia works in zero G
Oops. You forgot to include the analysis that lead you to this conclusion.
Sorry boys, Info probably doesn't understand what your comments mean !
A sufficient amount of fuel was carried for the engine burns necessary to escape the gravitational pull of the Earth on the outbound journey and the Moon on the return journey, and for minor mid-course corrections, and to place the spacecraft in orbit around the Moon. For most of the time the spacecraft coasted and used the Earth and the Moon’s gravitational pull to attract it towards them.
25,000 miles per hour is the speed required to attain escape velocity and break free from the Earth’s gravitational pull. From then on the spacecraft slowed and coasted following an elliptical orbit called a Hohmann transfer orbit, used to transfer a spacecraft between two different circular orbits around a central body in the same plane. It is the most economical path in terms of fuel and energy, but not the shortest or fastest. It involves two impulses, one to change the spacecraft’s speed and direction at the first orbit, and another to circularize the orbit at the destination.
The manoeuvre was named after Walter Hohmann, the German scientist who published a description of it in his 1925 book, ‘The Attainability of Celestial Bodies.’
@gunternetzer9621 OK thanks,I still don't understand why we can't get a picture of any of the landing sites on the moon today,surely the tech exists today for this?
Capricorn one
It's got OJ Simpson in it !
Per their video and pics....The earth is the same size as the moon looks from earth.... The earth should look huge as it many times larger .
Just imagine standing on the moon and looking at the earth... the earth would be all you would see. They didn't change the perspective.
I'll bet you have trouble wrapping your comprehensive ability around a Tootsie Pop too.
That's a true statement. I can see who struggles with a Tootsie Pop
Joe Playing Outdoors. You sure love your tootsie pops don't you. You keep talking about them in comment sections here. I bet you can vacuum quite a lot into your yap! 😵
@@christsrevenge8030 Sorry, you can't figure it out either can you?
You.... you do know how perspective works, yes? The Sun is absolutely huge, but it looks minuscule here on Earth. You can't even see gas giants with the naked eye without a telescope of some sort, and- hence the name- they are even bigger than the sun.
They can even go to the moon in this day with all these new technology and development
Of course they can, the problem is paying for what they need.
Elon Musk laughs at you 😅@@aaronmanternach5877
Elon Musk laughs at 😅@@aaronmanternach5877
@@aaronmanternach5877Elon Musk laughs at you😅
the apollo newspaper headlines and photos were ready from 10pm the night before they even got there...?
I had just turned 17 (summer before senior/HS) when this all took place~~I was excited (as I made a point of watching thru early hours, all the launches preceding this event)~~I was heartbroken when I saw the flag, waving in a breeze, as I knew this as an impossibility ~~~ and thus, I knew then and there this was a hoax of some sort, and proceeded to lose my long built faith in NASA and all it stood for~~~in essence, I'd lost a hero, amen~~~always wondered when some capable faction would step forward, and behold, here it is~~~~^*
To bad you didn't know about physics that's how it moves but I guess it's more fun to use you're imagination
@@vinnystern3598 what physics are you referring to? I'm being sincere cause I never heard a competent believable explanation as to why the flag waves....
@@Greg-ys2gy it's not waving it was moving because when they put it togerger in three pieces they had to plant it in the ground there is nothing to stop it from moving it would be like planting under water, when it starts moving there is nothing to stop it from moving if you watch the real footage one of them bumped into it so it stared moving again
You just assumed it was fake after that you never tried to figure out why?
Seriously it was moving because they put it together in 3 pieces it kept shaking after they put it in because there's nothing to stop it if its disturbed it was shaking so it looked like fluttering
I almost feel sorry for neil armstrong. Look at him. He is broken hearted that he has become the biggest liar in history .
Why? He is a 33rd degree free mason and knew what he was getting into.
Based on what?
@@gunternetzer9621 your face
@@AarnessMusic I've never been to the Moon.
Thank you for your work. Please make available a transcription as maybe there are others like me who aren't able to focus do the overpowering music conbined with the reading
-_- If you turn down the volume for the music, it also turns the narrators voice down -_- That’s *why* this person asked for the transcript🤦🏼♀️
"overpowering music"? It's mixed perfectly fine at a level far below the narration. Perhaps you should have your hearing checked.
That twilight zone music fits perfectly
25:54 that’s not a crease, it’s the shadow running across the ground from the right.
I came from jefree star live xd
Anyone else here because of Jeffree Star 💫?
VERY NICE... HIGHLY INFORMATIVE....
I'll bet you have trouble wrapping your comprehensive ability around a Tootsie Pop.
Joe Playing Outdoors. Again same copy and paste. Loser.
@@christsrevenge8030 Sorry, you can't figure it out either can you?
Hello, can someone pls tell me the title of the opera soundtrack that raises the curtain for this documentary? Thanks!
Yes...it is 'Dirty Laundry', by Don Henley. ☀️
Babe Root canada mass canada mass canada mass
those who can remove "ONE of truths protective layers" LOL
Yes that was such a cryptic thing he said.
MANKIND is sadly Not Man kind.
I've heard it said that flash bulbs were not included in the gear because the amount of fuel was so finite.....how then are wheels, tires ,axles, steering wheel, steering shaft, drive shaft, solar electric motor, solar array, seats,and a partridge in a pear tree part of the load out!?!?!? Also golf clubs, tees,and balls are more important than flash bulbs or camera lighting!!!!🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
I'll bet you have trouble wrapping your comprehensive ability around a Tootsie Pop.
The world may never know!🤣🤣🤣
@@jennninja9986 We now of your inability . . . ;>)
Joe Playing Outdoors. You already copy and pasted that same comment. Go play with your bum toy tootsie pops and stay off RUclips you loser.
Why would they need flash bulbs? Do you think they were out there crawling around in the dark?
Your incredulity is born of your ignorance and is not a valid argument.
You're basically saying "how come they took stuff they needed and didn't take stuff they didn't need?"
What Language are the subtitles?.
The script and narration are excellent.
Português do Brasil
All the world's indeed a stage
earth is a simulation, a ridiculous stage play and we're the actors.
save the video, before nasa takes down the video
I'll bet you have trouble wrapping your comprehensive ability around a Tootsie Pop.
@@JoeOutdoors have a great day..
@@roddepixanything2616 Thank You, I am having a great day thanks to the idiots here.
Joe Playing Outdoors.
NASA doesn't give a shit about a few Dunning Kruger victims. Get over yourself.
The lady talking is the same lady from Out Of The Shadows?
ASTRONAUTS GONE WILD (yes this is on Yutube......just fucking WOW!!)
Bart Sibrel (Sibrel.com), an award winning, yet controversial filmmaker, personally confronts eight Apollo astronauts with the newly discovered behind-the-scenes outtakes of fake photography which he presented for the first time to the entire world in "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon". When Sibrel publicly exposed the astronaut's criminal behavior, he was threatened with violence by one astronaut, physically assaulted by two other astronauts, and threatened to be assassinated by another astronaut . . . all on camera! . . . revealing that these men are not the honorable "heroes" that they appear to be, rather they are a bunch or angry and violent criminals, reacting bitterly for having their evil deeds exposed.
At time 8:58, when astronaut Buzz Aldrin was confronted with his guilt by Sibrel, who showed him the newly discovered unedited videotape of the fake photography from his mission on a nearby television monitor during an interview, Aldrin accidentally acknowledged the fraud on camera (thinking it was turned off) by declaring, "And this makes you a real famous person for having discovered all this! What an ego you must have to want to propel yourself like this." (How could Sibrel become famous if his accusations had no evidence?) When Aldrin realized that he had made an admission of guilt, he threatened to sue Sibrel if the interview was shown publicly.
At 40:29 Sibrel offered astronaut Neil Armstrong $5000 cash to donate to his favorite charity, if he would only take a five seconds to swear on a Bible that he actually walked on the moon. Very nervously, and surprisingly, Armstrong refused to bless a charity with merely a formal declaration of what is supposed to be true.
At 13:40 astronaut Alan Bean accidentally acknowledged that he never left Earth orbit, by emphatically asserting that he did not travel through the Van Allen Radiation Belts, which are at 25,000 miles beyond Earth orbit. When his hypocrisy was pointed out to him, he made a feeble attempt to recover from his error though a series of more misspeakings.
At 48:32 "Peace Activist" astronaut Ed Mitchell violently assaulted Sibrel from behind for exposing his lies, though he just said that he never hits anyone. (He can't go 5 seconds without lying.) Mitchell then threatened to get his gun and shoot him! Forgetting that the wireless microphone was still attached to himself after he closed the door and Sibrel left, the confidential audio revealed Mitchell and his son covertly discussing enlisting their friends at the CIA to have Sibrel assassinated. To this Sibrel said, "I don't it's fair that my taxes should have to pay for my own assassination!"
The question is, if they really went to the moon, and the notion of otherwise is silly, then why would the CIA have to be called to kill Bart Sibrel for his discovery?
At the end of "Astronauts Gone Wild", Sibrel showcases a short comedic film he created called "Getting Waxed", inspired by astronaut Mitchell's threat, in which the CIA chases and catches him for their devious purposes.
"Astronauts Gone Wild"
Produced and Directed by Bart Sibrel
ruclips.net/video/Qr6Vcvl0OeU/видео.html
RUclips removed it....I can not find it anymore.
I love this documentary so much. It's perfect. Like a tall cold glass of water after having been lost in a desert for weeks. Thank God for Bart Sibrel. A true hero of our time.
In the same category as Donald Trump and maybe that's it.
The crazy thing about the Moon landing was, they did it once but they never do it again! 🤣
And no pictures of stars on the far side of the moon..Oh perhaps someone forgot to take a camera.......There are many questions in this vid that have not been answered after all these years,thats why I can not believe they landed on the moon.So it seems to me,believers blindly believe and thats worrying.
Learn how cameras work.
I urge you if you are in London to go to the Science Museum in Kensington and see the "lunar lander" with your own eyes.
Since the Moon has no atmosphere, aerodynamic landings with wings are not possible, hence the lunar module’s strange shape and fragile look. The ascent and descent stages were built to be as light as possible as there was a limit on how much weight the Saturn V rocket could carry into orbit. Because they would operate only in a vacuum, many things didn't need to be sturdy, nor did the shape of it matter. It would never have to deal with aerodynamic drag or atmospheric pressure.
In fact, the LM was designed to buckle in the right places, as this was the most weight-efficient method of handling the shock of landing. The asymmetric bulges on either side of the cockpit housed the fuel and oxidizer tanks which had different densities. The LM was kept in balance by placing the less dense mass further out from the centre.
To increase the insulation properties, the Mylar/Kapton sheets were hand crinkled before blanket fabrication.This crinkling provided a path for venting and minimized contact conductance between the layers and so this was bound to make the outer layer rather uneven.
The lunar module’s cabin was made of welded aluminium alloy which was surrounded by a 3-inch-thick layer of insulating material. A thin outer skin of aluminium covered the insulation. The misconception that the skin was as thin as aluminium foil stems from this thin outer layer being misconstrued as the ship's only skin.
Yes, they are an intelligent species I hear,
Really?
Yes, they possess Nuclear technology, trouble is they have them pointed at each other,
How does that make them intelligent?
26 lovers vs 4 haters.
Everything in this movie is very possible..moon landing on the first go is just suspicious
hardly first go.... Apollo10 orbited it.. step by step
@@wallypayton9366 maybe you need to educate yourself on the engineering, every single mission had critical issues, including of course Apollo 13.
Space is water. Firmament separates. KJV
Ross Q Woke Soul Denver - I’m not sure about the KJV, but I think you’re correct.
@@JosephQPublic me either... Good point. But definitely NOT a moving ba'al.
They deleted all the videos like this one!
Those bastards!
The man never go to the moon.
Faking the orbit is the deal breaker, explain yourself NASA!!!
War started with farming when egos could thrive.
Psalms 19:1 "The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork."
The best documentary ever
I agree. This is the best most important documentary ever made.
@@AarnessMusic It displays total ignorance of Apollo procedures and equipment and just makes a series of conjectures and assumptions that have no basis in scientific or historical fact.
@@gunternetzer9621 and yet, the appolo missions are still the dumbest things ever. What a fraud.
@@AarnessMusic If you study this subject and understand the science, historical perspective and the equipment and procedures used, you will come to the conclusion that limited spaceflight was perfectly possible in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, and that the United States did in fact put men on the Moon.
It was one of the most public events of the 20th century, viewed around the world. Any conspiracy would had to have involved hundreds of different people from many different countries over decades, including Great Britain, the former Soviet Union, France, Australia, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, Canada, China, Japan and India, from which not one credible witness has ever emerged. It would also have been impossible to cover up for such a length of time; the Watergate conspirators couldn’t keep their escapade silent for more than a few months.
There are no ‘anomalies’ that cannot be explained scientifically and there is much third-party corroboration; for example, the spacecraft were tracked to the Moon, the rock and soil samples have been authenticated by many different scientists around the world for decades, the dust from the rover falls back in a way only possible in a 1/6g vacuum and Chinese, Japanese and Indian probes have photographed and or observed the equipment left behind at various Apollo landing sites.
@@gunternetzer9621
How do you explain the use of the window & props to create the image of round Earth & it's terminator line?.
Google, the firmament 👍
Flat earther detected
at 17;10 jfk said they secured these large boosters.... Who did they secure them from?
The interdiemensional aliens
ocean
From contractors
Doesn't the earth spin?
Yes it does - at a whopping 15 degrees per hour, slow enough that you would need a time lapse of several hours to see anything. Meanwhile, the speed needed to stay in orbit is about 17,000 miles per hour and the clips SIbrel used are about 12-15 minutes long each. At that speed at that time, the astronauts would have crossed betweeen 1/8 and 1/6 of the entire planet, so if they are in orbit why do the clouds and landmasses not change even though they would have crossed entire continents or oceans?
Note that this illusion would be possible from geosynchronous orbit, but that would require being able to not only cross, but linger inside the very same Van Allen Belts that are supposed to be entire reason for the hoax in the first place, so why aren't they just going to the moon?
Just doesn't seem right that they can show a picture when they are so far out in space and earth is stationery. I mean, shouldn't earth be spinning so fast? Of course what do I know, I'm sure there's a reason why a craft so many miles outside earth's orbit would just see a stationery earth. Thank you for explaining although I'm still confused
@@ralphjvon594 A thousand miles per hour on a sphere 24,000 miles in circumference is approximately .0042 degrees per second slow enough that you would need to be counting individual pixels to see any motion without a time lapse. That may sound like a ludicrously fast speed, but an outside observer would see it crawl by at half the speed of the hour hand of a clock.
Thank you
Crazy how well this footage shows Jackie (A Jesuit Priests daughter) blowing JFK face off... Right up under the chin
I could listen to Jeffree star talk about this for ages he seems so passionate about it and rightly so
Healthy bowel movements create happy people ...
Anybody got a nickle for the arm, the record is skipping.
What a waste of my time! The closest thing they got right was that Apollo weighed as much as a battle ship. By that they were off by a factor of 15, Apollo was 3050 tons, Iowa class battle ship 45,700 tons. After that their research & conclusions just got worse.
Go and debunk it then. All you’ve done is cry about the trivial issue of a mis comparison of weight. Explain to us how there are mis matching shadows, no ground disturbance below the 3000*C engine required for landing and taking off. And show us how the video clearly showing them faking the earth shot is a hoax. I bet you didn’t even watch the video
@@rhysnichols8608 So would you prefer a nice well-thought out hour and a half video/miniseries debunk covering every point Sibrel makes? Or would you like to skip to the chase and watch a two minute clip of the third section of "filming the Earth" Sibrel doesn't use (despite using footage seconds before) where the camera is shown filming an Earth that is clearly outside from about six inches from a fully illuminated square window and which he continues to to his utmost to avoid talking about even after having his nose rubbed in it like a dog that shit the carpet?
@@rhysnichols8608 I'll bet you have trouble wrapping your comprehensive ability around a Tootsie Pop.
@@kevinskinner4986 They seem to like having their noses rubbed in it especially when it goes up their nose to replenish the brains.
Let's make it easy kids. Do it again. I will make it easy for you - don't use new tech just duplicate the same bullshit NASA supposedly did. Let me know when we head back to the moon 😂😂😂
I can feel my brain shrinking while I watch this...
ruclips.net/video/O9y_AVYMEUs/видео.html to all of yall who believe this, theh simulated the entire thing, and found out that everything was within reason with the lighting, shadows, exposure, etc.
it's so obvious they have never been to the moon...
It is not obvious at all.
Why, because you say so? We did go to the moon.....6 times. You don't "believe" in the moon landings. You either understand the science, or you don't.
At the 23:04 min mark on the video, there is a shade in the Astro Nots visor for a 3rd person. I wonder who that was... The cameraman maybe....
Another urban myth propagated by Nexus magazine, Fortean Times and associated loony tunes. It's either a lens flare or a piece of equipment.
Google: Michael Willis Chase
🎵❤️🌎🌻😇🙏👽🔥🔥🎶
#Blessings
………………………………………...talk
Astronauts Gone Wild
If I went to space I would take hundreds of photos of earth and we don't have even have one that is not CGI.
We do actually.
Great Doc 👍🏽
Totally wrong, however.
Thomas Kundera I don’t recall asking for Thomas’s input. 🤔
@@spliffmaticdgz : I didn't asked yous either, but you posted your message anyway.
Thomas Kundera but yet here you are worried about someone else’s opinion.
@@spliffmaticdgz : of course I am!
We share the same planet. So I would like you to be well informed to.
I dont think they really went but what do I know..
They went who would go through all of this trouble to fake a landing for financial gain. If the government is wicked why wouldn't they just take tax payers dollar without these fictional elaborate schemes.
@@jameshorton5395 it can't be too obvious, why would anyone think they lied about this? They don't think that, that's the point. Reaching the moon before any other nation is a massive statement of power, Americans were scared when Sputnik got into Orbit, imagine what getting a craft to the moon with precision would look like, replace the shuttle with a missile and everyone shits their pants, through fear you can obtain control. Not only that, but concerning people with matters of space takes attention off of our finite world and tells us that we're all just a mistake, one planet in an infinite ocean or the claimed "1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000" planets, it gives the impression that there is nothing special about us. It destroys our sense of purpose and ambitions
It depends on the individuals perspective. You feel as if 1,000,000,000,000,000, planets make u feel as if life as we know it is insignificant. So we replace the thought of living in an infinite universe with a god or higher power to give you purpose. I think religious beliefs are awesome and necessary to help some people cope with the uncertainties of life. I see the beauty of having the privilege to experience life on this small planet in a massive universe without any rhyme or rythm.is The glass half empty of half full? depends on the individual.
@@jameshorton5395 I feel as you do, but I think it's different for most people.
They must of gone governments have never lied to us have they ..lol but would be a near impossible hoax to pull off
I WON'T watch anymore of Bart Sibrel's new videos, as he DISABLED COMMENTS. He took away our FREE SPEECH.
Because he's a lying con artist and will have fifty million comments disputing everything he says if he doesn't. Aulis also shut down their forums because they couldn't respond to the criticism they were getting. Jarrah's lucky he has an account at all. Not only does he censor his comment section to remove people that try and call him out, he mass flagged hundreds of pro-Apollo and rebuttal videos with false copyright strikes in a deliberate attempt to get people's accounts banned. He should have been banned from the website for breaking the terms of service and abusing their systems. Filing false DMCA claims to harass people is PERJURY by the way.
It’s u tube messing with the commentary
Please like this comment:
I'm searching for a lost Kennedy assassination documentary that includes knowledge of 8 gunmen whereby the 8th gunman was seen nearby with muddy hands from the sewer underneath the pavement where Kennedy was shot dead
28:10 he's definitely lying. Body language gives it away. Even looks down & to the left.
was President Kennedy assassination files opened
patrick karuri Some files were opened. Trump made an excuse why most files had to remain secret.
I think if you don't see the utter nonsense of it immediately you won't give a damn about the facts
Not even slightly convinced by this drivel.
We cannot land on the moon with 1950 tech... we could however, with new tech. the radiation belt is thick af
Operation Paperclip
Wait until you realize the kjv bible is the truth and who is behind it all
Thank you Bart sibrel. I'm sorry buzz light-year Aldrin punched you. You deserve a purple heart and buzz deserves life in prison
Sibrel got exactly what he deserved for releasing this trash. I can debunk EVERYTHING in his "documentary". You don't "believe" in the moon landings, you either understand the science/engineering, or you don't. I already know which category you fall under.
logic
So, the mythological Tower of Babel and the Titanic? That's how we're assessing humanities engineering capability? Let's not consider the thousands of ships, aircraft carriers, and submarines humanity has built that successfully and safely carry thousands of passengers around the world every second of every day. This whole film is a joke. Their conclusion that all shadows on the moon must be parallel, despite the fact that shadows on Earth cast by the sun are not parallel due to uneven terrain is just one undeniable example of the creators ineptitude.
when armstrong says " i don't recall" .. look at the other guys reactions.. fuck that is the wrong thing to say.. you will remember every god damn detail of that mission mate. only hardcore liars say shit like "i dont recall.. i dont remember".. reminds me of the police interogation videos of murderers getting busted... trying to come up with excuses lol
Exactly...saying you don't recall stars is like saying you went to the grocery store and don't recall seeing any food.
Or going to the desert and not recalling any sand.
Total bullshit.
Yes this is awful Sibrel should be ashamed of himself, this is pure garbage.
Didn't get to the moon because of the van allan belt, had to fake it, that's a pretty big reason
getting away with defrauding multi billion dollars can be quite the motivation. greed's a helluva drug. . . and tell gus grissoms family that we went and that his death was merely a coincidental tragedy.
all you brain dead idiots can say is "what garbage" etc.. whilst not explaining one god damn thing as to why /. wake up mate they are sucking your life force out of you
Why are you choosing to be dumb and stupid? Accept reality
They went around the Van Allen Belts. The flight paths are very well documented. If you bunch of laymen spent half as much time fact checking as you did boasting what you think are aha points, you'd have put this shit behind you a long time ago.
Jesus is Lord . Earth is flat .
Get help.
@@Abruzzo333 I have the best help his name is Jesus christ ,I suggest u get help if u don't know him
What a load of garbage.
this film has been utterly and very meticulously debunked.
pls go to this site and see photo 9.(www.theatlantic.com/photo/2019/07/apollo-11-moon-landing-photos-50-years-ago/594448/)read the caption
About an hour(actually 57 min) into their flight, Armstrong took this photo of Aldrin. #
NASA
lift off on july 16, 1969 was 9:32 am, but aldrin's watch said 5:35 (am/pm ?) or it should be 10:35 am( actually10:29 am.) how did this happen ?
What else did you expect...the truth ???
@@niledgreat5224 Good question,,the one thing I do know that matches up is that they supposedly suited up at 5:35 am, so maybe the picture you saw was when they suited up, hard to say but his watch saying 5:35 am and that being the known time they suited up...
@@seoranklab1230 Daylight savings time . . . ;>)
@@johnnosiennek7066 Not from this piece of crap.
A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon is one of the dumbest pieces of propaganda I've ever seen. Right up there with Creationist garbage about the Grand Canyon.
I rebuke you satan
keep sleeping
Just wanted to ask you why didn’t Russia give up after the US split the atom? I mean, it was already done. They sure the hell gave up on a manned lunar landing didn’t they?
Think about the strategic military advantage to having a lunar base. Think about how many billions would be saved conducting launches from the moon instead of launches from earth. There is a fortune in Helium 3 on the moon, surely someone like China could get humans up there. Right? Why did NASA say we couldn’t make it there today because we “lost” the technology? What does that mean? It’s like saying since we invented guns we forgot how to make a bow. Since we have Blu-ray we forgot how to make VHS.
There is proof we made it there, with something, I’m just not sure it was manned.
I’m also not a creationists. Why? There are a lot of holes in the story. Just like the manned lunar landing.
Idiot
Louis Hackett - They could come out and say it was fake and you still wouldn’t believe them.
It’s the same people who take MSM at face value that believe we went to the moon...
NASA =NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SPACE ACTORS 🏆🏆🏆
Healthy bowel movements create happy people ...
Is that right DISCHARGE Summary? You made me laugh before I took a dump, now I am going to take a dump. I should be real happy by the time you read this!!
lol
Joe Playing Outdoors. Don't forget to wipe,
your stupid yap.
Healthy bowel movements create happy people ...
Better make it a quarter, skipping pretty bad . . . ;>)