I lack the context to fully appreciate this but this was interesting, thank you. I agree with your analysis that by limiting his concern to material needs, Marx was unable to address fundamental human needs. I wonder how possible it would be to combine Marxist theory with theory meant to address the other aspects of wellbeing
I also tried to see that, but in the strict sense, it becomes impossible. the humanist aspect of Marx could be compared with Buddha, but still Marx does not give any space for the transcendental.
@@ProfGKSpeaks and you would say that transcendental theory is necessary for humans well-being? By the way, I interpret transcendental in this case to be spiritual, let me know if I am wrong
I lack the context to fully appreciate this but this was interesting, thank you. I agree with your analysis that by limiting his concern to material needs, Marx was unable to address fundamental human needs. I wonder how possible it would be to combine Marxist theory with theory meant to address the other aspects of wellbeing
I also tried to see that, but in the strict sense, it becomes impossible. the humanist aspect of Marx could be compared with Buddha, but still Marx does not give any space for the transcendental.
@@ProfGKSpeaks and you would say that transcendental theory is necessary for humans well-being? By the way, I interpret transcendental in this case to be spiritual, let me know if I am wrong
@@josb9836 I wouldn't say that. It shall be, of one feels for it then yes and otherwise no. It is all upto one