Neither did those Hindu rulers! There was a problem the Muslims encountered in India. They built many educational institutions in Central Asia, West Asia and Middle East, as well as North Africa and Spain. In South Asia, any attempt to build any educational institutes would mean running into the caste-ridden, Brahman dominated, very unequal society. A broken society makes for poor educational environment.
@@Zarghaam12 no end to ignorance young man indus was the host of sll ath best universities. enter modern mathematocs was discovered where they had critical discussions without fear of death the entire system was destroyed by th iski. theocrats. what planet. do you live on ? i dias contributions stopped The aryabhatta school moved to ketsls where the throcrats hF not reached thst are you s madrasa graduate ? maybe you will discover the ne t black hole
the hindus invented ontology epistemology snd modern mstjrmeticd thd arabs had universities with minor contributions nothing more the universities of cordobs and toledo paining frintbif hindu universities read dime history
Secular uni?! Secular relations were started by Akbar...while Hindus struggle with caste marriage till date...and 2014 RSS victimhood and pakistan like "saazish" by foreign players or this or that is creating the last filthy aspect that all other. Societies have...i.e. moral corruption.
Beautiful, you talk of gray areas in History, lot of Sharing and caring went into as well. People, history and culture are compartmentlise a lot more now, eraser of any meaningful interactions, intracacies are carried out..loud and clear. Your talk is somewhat a glimmer of hope.
British colonisation versus Islamic colonisation. There were massive atrocities that happened during Islamic colonialism but these people want to make a narrative that it was the greatest thing on earth. an native aboriginal entire culture of Middle East Afghanistan Bangladesh Kashmir Iran Pakistan and from rest of Middle East was erased.
If one wants to really know what was Mughal rule like , just read the Description by francois Bernier the french Doctor who came to india during Aurangzeb Succession to throne . The Dark and stark reality will open b4 u and u will realise how much suffering ur Ancestors must have under that rule, if u arent from Moslem family of central asia. If u are OBC SC consider worst. If u r women from Brahmin or kshatriya worst of all .😢
And if untouchables you'd be worst than the worst you can think of. Partners in crime were crushing them physically socially economically virtually educationally literally culturally without a fickle
@@ankit5820 untouchable have been in opression since ancient time till modern century , even today they r not in that much of a good shape. But in modern india under democracy they have become far better
I have read Bernier. He has described India as he percieved it. Mughal ruler was far enlightened than the rulers of his own country. The issue is what our forefathers doing? Eating Biryani?
Samrat Ashoka should have been mentioned here. It was under his reign that India, for the first time, was unified under a single authority. He ruled almost the entire Indian subcontinent, a feat that no one else has fully achieved, not even the British, who were unable to conquer Afghanistan during their rule.
@@paulalexander5358 "Blinkers? What do you mean by that? What I said is correct, and you haven't countered it with any facts. My comment was made specifically in the context of William's opening remarks, where he mentioned the Gupta dynasty but overlooked Ashoka, who was arguably the mightiest ruler in India's history. Now, could you clarify the context in which you made your comment?"
Well there is no conclusive evidence that he ruled the entire subcontinent. The only reason behind this assumption was that we found some pillars in the south and at Khyber pass. Which were on the routes used by Buddhist monks. That's not conclusive evidence for such a powerful claim. People in the past had very different world views. The idea of the unification of a nation is the result of the rise of nationalism in the whole world.
no mention of anything negative for Islamic colonisation. All the destruction and massacres definitely never happened. these guys should feel some shame.
The Mughals destroyed much of the Indian economy, which was thriving throughout known history, according to Angus Madison. Crushing and humiliating religious Jizya tax on most of the population reduced the prosperous regions to utter emaciating poverty. Records indicate that Hindus were even prohibited from wearing good clothes or any religious festivities and even from mourning for the dead. It is pathetic to mischaracterize the destructive forces as uniting India.
@@ruthnaswamy4741 India's share of world GDP was more than one third of world GDP for most of history, until the barbaric Mughal invasions reduced it to a quarter of world GDP. Chinese GDP, which was second best became higher than Indian GDP, except for a short period during Akbar, when they coincidentally fared worse. No credit to Akbar for that.
the Scots and the Irish hated the English for what they did. Mix that with common day lefty, liberal, woke philosophy: The Hindus were the majority and hence brutal oppressors ;) you get Bill. Interesting figure, some original work but far off the mark. Still better than many of our own Marxists.
After nearly 10 minutes of nothing happening except an overly long dissertation in Spanish, I left..... Subtitles might have helped..... OK-I decided to watch this. I have always admired Akbar's religious tolerance and broadmindedness. As a South Indian, I am aware that the Mughal Empire had less influence that far south, but I appreciate both my parents' respect for those of ALL religions. My mother in particular-a very strict Orthodox Brahmin, is deeply saddened by what is going on in India today with Hindutva, to which she has never subscribed. She grew up in an area with many Muslims, Jews, and Christians and respects all faiths. This is India at its best. I totally understand the unaddressed resentment, in India, of repeated invasions-I feel it myself- but in my opinion, oppressing Muslims-most of whom are, in genetic terms, ethnic Indians-is the wrong way forward.
Akbar is not Mughal India. Akbar was the best of the lot, but his rule had stains that could not be washed off. The rest of the Mughal kings were of the jihadi-gaazi garden variety...
@@crtp47 Don't need to. The courtiers of the Mughals have written biographies and 1st hand accounts. Start with these 3 - Baburnama Akbarnama Maasir-i-alamgiri The 3 most important and then look into other books.
All the keyboard Hindu warriors commenting here, he hasn’t said that India didn’t exist before Mughal India…He’s also talking about his subject of expertise.
@@dhrubajyotidebnath6192it’s your inferiority complex that doesn’t allow you to acknowledge that the Mughal empire was a part of India’s glorious history, a part of our culture and civilisation that has shaped our country.
@@ShilMuscat one who doesn't know how much brutal their reign was can told this kind of stupid argument 🙄 😒 no wonder you are same people who lick the foot of all the invaders of india. That's why I gave the jews analogy as you don't want to recognize your own peoples genocide but have knowledge about others
Mughals were foreign invaders, looters, carried out genocide on the Sindhu/Vedic culture, you being a Muslim and probably a Pakistani, think an Englishman should enlighten Indians about the history of Subcontinent, and we should appreciate Invaders, maybe you should take same thinking and apply it to Islam and thier borrowing of Prophets from Torah, Palestine which never existed, it not even mentioned in he Quran but Israel has..@ShilMuscat
Couldn’t go thru the whole video. Akbar was a moderate. Most Moghuls were not. India’s GDP was high even before the Mughals. Unlike the British, Moghuls’ didn’t move the money out and they did reinvest. Bharat was always united as a culture. Bharatvarsh extended beyond the current boundaries. Yes, kingdoms existed kind of like states today with greater autonomy. There was infighting between the kingdoms much like in Europe today.
My simple SuBmission when MughaL Distroying The places of Worship's What waS the Mighter Rajput's Worriors doing in HarraM ? enjoying the Mughal Mujra ?
Sirs, mughal sultanate in india was inherently extractive .They extracted the labor and wealth of indians through taxation,which financed their military campaigns of 300 years against hindus and other muslim nawabs as well as an extremely lavish luxurious lifestyle. Their legacy was a handful of monuments comprising of 3 major forts,several mauseums,several mosques,a discarded township,a victory massive gate and also a few gardens.They were least concerned about the polity's welfare and were certainly against hindus and sikhs,killing several sikh gurus and their kids.
Don't worry it's no use they will always glorify invaders as they are them self invaders who not just conquer but also genocide the native Americans. So it's no surprise what they are doing 🤔 by this they are just justifing their own invasion
@@paulalexander5358open ur mind to evidence like revenue records, biographies of various rulers, traveller accounts, epigraphic, archeological, architectural etc.
Great insight from a European scholar. He must have done thorough research on this subject. One thing which needs to be corrected is religious views of Jahangir. He was not as pluralistic in religious matters as his father was. He did take interest in Hinduism but he was more of a critique than a fan. At one occasion, he painstakingly disproved Hindu priests claim about a bottomless holy pond. With the rise of Nur Jehan and her brother Asif Jah, Hindu influence in defence matters greatly declined. First half of 17th century was a period in which Mughal dynasty had no potential rivals. Mughals fully utilised that period of peace and prosperity and built lots of world-class buildings. We see lots of Mughal monuments that were actually built in that period. However, they still lacked in one thing i.e. scientific learning. There was a viable system of education but that system cannot be compared with school system of Europe.
@@piku7800 Yes, there was a school system in Europe. In addition to religious schools like Madrassahs , universal public education system came in the same 17th century. That foundation proved to be a launching pad for scientific discoveries of next century. Right at a time when 18th century India was presenting a scene of anarchy, war and lawlessness, Europe was celebrating achievements of its discoverers and inventors. For example, electricity was discovered in mid 18th century. Great scientist volta presented its theories in 18th century.Good thing is that those scientific discoveries didn't stay in Europe. People of other regions also benefited from new discoveries because Europeans had reached in almost every continent of the world. That's why I maintain that colonisation proved as blessing in disguise for people of Asia and Africa. For example, Railways were primarily laid for military purpose ( Refer British expedition in northern Africa) but it became public property once peace was established in those regions. Similarly, Telegraph system in India saved British Raj (when a timely message from a telegraph operator alerted other regions and reinforcements came just at the right time -Refer Mutiny of 1857), but later on telegraph or telephone became a public property.
Why people always talk about Mughals? There was people here before Mughals. It is like historian wants to white wash our history before Mughals. There was a great civilization in south India. There was Punjab empire. There was Maratha empire. There was Ashoka empire.
WEALTH - Gold precious stones & artistic skills...that's why the Moguls came!!...even Alexander 300 BCE set out for INDIA - BUT the elephants in armor were terrifying even for The Great one
Y u read modern physics chemistry bio history anthropology n use modern tech like mobile n internet without shame n disgust. There r a lot of things in world studies in organised way. Different things r studies by different ppl. He's a historian guy from the 7-8 to 17-19 century of India like they're r many for different times of history.
It is true that a lot is written about Mughals. It’s also true that lot more historical records about Mughals are available to write history about them. But then why some two hundred years history of Babur to Aurangzeb are given as much space in text books compared to other periods under empires that were as strong? Ask NCERT of yesteryears
are you serious one possible anecdote that has never been substantiated against 40 thousand temples destroyed r every university destroyed and the minks killed you have perverted mind to compare that Buddhism is a part of sanatan dharma not different it is you jihadis and and r be colonialist christians who used divide and rule grow up and read up on Himdu and Buddhist ontology and epistemology it is ignoramuses like you who hold India back
If the mughals were as ruthless as the BJP depicts....India could not have remained a hindu majority country.The bankers in India were always Hindus and Rajputs their military commanders.Its the peasants who felt the might of the power and Hindu caste system which forced the lower classes to convert to Islam.
A point many fail to grasp. Hindustan was a join collaboration between Rajput warrior groups and Turkic tribes an warrior clans from central Asia. What we call India today is in essence an Indo-Muslim nation.
India is richer and better because of all the Muslims dynasties and Islam's influence. Other than the Adivasis, most Indians trace their origins to migration from other lands. Almost EVERYONE is a foreigner. Kingdoms and empires were bloody - these were absolute rulers, not liberal democrats, be it the Mughals or any Hindu maharaja. Thank you, Dalrymple.
@@muditchaudhary7255 There is a BIG difference. Indians narrate history, Europeans tell history. Indians don’t have the history of distorting European or Greek history. Now, Europeans will be allowed to meddle in India’s history.
This guy is just obsessed with Mughal history. Nothing else.No takers in his own country , so he comes to India to fool everyone.We should give no importance to him. After all who is he ? Writers like him are found a dime a dozen. And he needs to realize that you can fool people sometimes not all the time.
YOU ARE SPOT ON This Dalrymple is a Scotsman, a non- entity, who has an inferiority complex because his tiny country is colonised & ruled for more than 300 yrs by the English until this day. To run salt to the wound, Scotland continues as a colonialn entity within Britain governed from London only because of billions of £s annual grant from London ( Westminster Central govt ).... This Dalrymple therefore has an inferiority complex & he therefore incarnates on the Hindu soil & glorifies Muslim Mughal rulers & thus makes Hindus feel inferior....the naive, gullible Hindus, themselves already having an inferiority complex due to savage, exploitative British colonial rule, readily oblige & give Dalrymple a VIP treatment equivalent to that they used to give to their Viceroy of colonial India.... Having acquired subtle psychological control & superiority over the Hindu minds, Dalrymple now has the audacity to produceb& present above video obsessively glorifying barbaric Mughal muslims & totally ignoring these Mughal monsters's destruction & desecration of Hindu temples, rapes, forced conversion of Hindus etc This Dalrymple us NOT a friend of Hindus...he should be made to feel extremely uncomfortable in India . This should br deported promptly & sent back to his native Scotland If he had any sense of fairness & obligation towards Hindus who have given him so much hospitality & made him feel at home in India, you would think, he would research into the history & architecture of Hindu temples, other ancient Hindu monuments & the Vedic culture & religion, discoveries in Science, Mathematics, Medicine, astronomy etc ... But no...Dalrymple is NOT interested in researching & glorifying pre Mughal ancient Hindu India...He is just obsessed with Mughal Muslim rule & he knows that that's the only way he can have control ovet Hinfu minds as well as prevent or delay the ascendancy of India ( under Modi rule ) as an emerging global economic, technological, military & spiritual power ( the latter already commands strong cultural influences globally across the world )... Hare Krishna Bharat mata ki jai 11 Nov 2024 Hare
Mughals, just like previous Muslim rulers didn’t build any secular university- only more palaces and mosques; howsoever beautiful.
Neither did those Hindu rulers! There was a problem the Muslims encountered in India. They built many educational institutions in Central Asia, West Asia and Middle East, as well as North Africa and Spain. In South Asia, any attempt to build any educational institutes would mean running into the caste-ridden, Brahman dominated, very unequal society. A broken society makes for poor educational environment.
@Zarghaam12 have heard of vikramshila university mr Einstein 😂😂😂😂
@@Zarghaam12 no end to ignorance
young man indus was the host of sll ath best universities. enter modern mathematocs was discovered where they had critical discussions without fear of death the entire system was destroyed by th iski. theocrats. what planet. do you live on ?
i dias contributions stopped The aryabhatta school
moved to ketsls where the throcrats hF not reached thst
are you s madrasa graduate ? maybe you will discover the ne t black hole
the hindus invented ontology epistemology snd modern mstjrmeticd
thd arabs had universities with minor contributions
nothing more the universities of cordobs and toledo paining frintbif hindu universities read dime history
Secular uni?! Secular relations were started by Akbar...while Hindus struggle with caste marriage till date...and 2014 RSS victimhood and pakistan like "saazish" by foreign players or this or that is creating the last filthy aspect that all other. Societies have...i.e. moral corruption.
Beautiful, you talk of gray areas in History, lot of Sharing and caring went into as well. People, history and culture are compartmentlise a lot more now, eraser of any
meaningful interactions, intracacies are carried out..loud and clear. Your talk is somewhat a glimmer of hope.
Wonderful presentation, engaging entertaining.and informative. Thank you.
British colonisation versus Islamic colonisation. There were massive atrocities that happened during Islamic colonialism but these people want to make a narrative that it was the greatest thing on earth. an native aboriginal entire culture of Middle East Afghanistan Bangladesh Kashmir Iran Pakistan and from rest of Middle East was erased.
If one wants to really know what was Mughal rule like , just read the Description by francois Bernier the french Doctor who came to india during Aurangzeb Succession to throne .
The Dark and stark reality will open b4 u and u will realise how much suffering ur Ancestors must have under that rule, if u arent from Moslem family of central asia. If u are OBC SC consider worst. If u r women from Brahmin or kshatriya worst of all .😢
And if untouchables you'd be worst than the worst you can think of.
Partners in crime were crushing them physically socially economically virtually educationally literally culturally without a fickle
@@ankit5820 untouchable have been in opression since ancient time till modern century , even today they r not in that much of a good shape. But in modern india under democracy they have become far better
@@GuzzarAwan is this unofficial IT cell on personal will from some urban big city's posh area.
@@ankit5820 I dont understand what u r saying
I have read Bernier. He has described India as he percieved it. Mughal ruler was far enlightened than the rulers of his own country. The issue is what our forefathers doing? Eating Biryani?
Samrat Ashoka should have been mentioned here. It was under his reign that India, for the first time, was unified under a single authority. He ruled almost the entire Indian subcontinent, a feat that no one else has fully achieved, not even the British, who were unable to conquer Afghanistan during their rule.
But he was anti hindu, urban naxal ,anti national , Nehru liked him
You MISS EVERYTHING when you have 'BLINKERS'...
@@paulalexander5358 "Blinkers? What do you mean by that? What I said is correct, and you haven't countered it with any facts. My comment was made specifically in the context of William's opening remarks, where he mentioned the Gupta dynasty but overlooked Ashoka, who was arguably the mightiest ruler in India's history. Now, could you clarify the context in which you made your comment?"
Well there is no conclusive evidence that he ruled the entire subcontinent. The only reason behind this assumption was that we found some pillars in the south and at Khyber pass. Which were on the routes used by Buddhist monks. That's not conclusive evidence for such a powerful claim. People in the past had very different world views. The idea of the unification of a nation is the result of the rise of nationalism in the whole world.
@@rakeshvetalHow long did Ashoka's reign actually last? The empire pretty much got toasted after him
Mughals are civilization. Man they are creating words out of nowhere.
A proper title would fit: the decivilisation of mughal in India
no mention of anything negative for Islamic colonisation. All the destruction and massacres definitely never happened. these guys should feel some shame.
From Akbar to Shah Jahan, and after aurangzeb, the rule was pretty much not discriminative.
The Mughals destroyed much of the Indian economy, which was thriving throughout known history, according to Angus Madison. Crushing and humiliating religious Jizya tax on most of the population reduced the prosperous regions to utter emaciating poverty. Records indicate that Hindus were even prohibited from wearing good clothes or any religious festivities and even from mourning for the dead. It is pathetic to mischaracterize the destructive forces as uniting India.
India was one of the richest countries during the time of Akbar, with 23% of the world's GDP
@@ruthnaswamy4741 India's share of world GDP was more than one third of world GDP for most of history, until the barbaric Mughal invasions reduced it to a quarter of world GDP. Chinese GDP, which was second best became higher than Indian GDP, except for a short period during Akbar, when they coincidentally fared worse. No credit to Akbar for that.
Honest and fair discussion, 🙏 please don't bring politics into this.
Not surprising he loved you boys, bacha baazi is by product of the followers of this ideology 😂
Dalrymple's corpus ultimately 'celebrates' almost all the previous colonisations of India prior to the British....
the Scots and the Irish hated the English for what they did. Mix that with common day lefty, liberal, woke philosophy:
The Hindus were the majority and hence brutal oppressors ;) you get Bill.
Interesting figure, some original work but far off the mark. Still better than many of our own Marxists.
After nearly 10 minutes of nothing happening except an overly long dissertation in Spanish, I left..... Subtitles might have helped..... OK-I decided to watch this. I have always admired Akbar's religious tolerance and broadmindedness. As a South Indian, I am aware that the Mughal Empire had less influence that far south, but I appreciate both my parents' respect for those of ALL religions. My mother in particular-a very strict Orthodox Brahmin, is deeply saddened by what is going on in India today with Hindutva, to which she has never subscribed. She grew up in an area with many Muslims, Jews, and Christians and respects all faiths. This is India at its best. I totally understand the unaddressed resentment, in India, of repeated invasions-I feel it myself- but in my opinion, oppressing Muslims-most of whom are, in genetic terms, ethnic Indians-is the wrong way forward.
Pure Manipulative video. No mention of the massive atrocities committed by these colonisers.
Dalrymple is a propagandist. Persian was the language and all the mint positions to the foreigners
Akbar is not Mughal India. Akbar was the best of the lot, but his rule had stains that could not be washed off.
The rest of the Mughal kings were of the jihadi-gaazi garden variety...
They sound cool...
Terrorist spotted! @@ali-yp3yw
Which book have you written on this subject? Would love to read
@@crtp47 Don't need to. The courtiers of the Mughals have written biographies and 1st hand accounts.
Start with these 3 -
Baburnama
Akbarnama
Maasir-i-alamgiri
The 3 most important and then look into other books.
They invaded and destroyed Indic culture .but you won’t touch that issue ..
Regardless India was the richest country in the world at that time which never happened in the past or today
occupiers & colonizers.
All the keyboard Hindu warriors commenting here, he hasn’t said that India didn’t exist before Mughal India…He’s also talking about his subject of expertise.
Telling mughal history as a glorious chapter and civilization of india is as same as telling jews about how the glorious nazi empire was
@@dhrubajyotidebnath6192it’s your inferiority complex that doesn’t allow you to acknowledge that the Mughal empire was a part of India’s glorious history, a part of our culture and civilisation that has shaped our country.
@@ShilMuscat one who doesn't know how much brutal their reign was can told this kind of stupid argument 🙄 😒 no wonder you are same people who lick the foot of all the invaders of india. That's why I gave the jews analogy as you don't want to recognize your own peoples genocide but have knowledge about others
@@dhrubajyotidebnath6192shameful comparison.
Mughals were foreign invaders, looters, carried out genocide on the Sindhu/Vedic culture, you being a Muslim and probably a Pakistani, think an Englishman should enlighten Indians about the history of Subcontinent, and we should appreciate Invaders, maybe you should take same thinking and apply it to Islam and thier borrowing of Prophets from Torah, Palestine which never existed, it not even mentioned in he Quran but Israel has..@ShilMuscat
How about writing something on the Guptas where modern mathematics was invented
Couldn’t go thru the whole video.
Akbar was a moderate. Most Moghuls were not. India’s GDP was high even before the Mughals. Unlike the British, Moghuls’ didn’t move the money out and they did reinvest.
Bharat was always united as a culture. Bharatvarsh extended beyond the current boundaries. Yes, kingdoms existed kind of like states today with greater autonomy. There was infighting between the kingdoms much like in Europe today.
Wow I never thought that Louis C K would make such a radical career change.
My simple SuBmission when MughaL Distroying The places of Worship's What waS the Mighter Rajput's Worriors doing in HarraM ?
enjoying the Mughal Mujra ?
Sirs, mughal sultanate in india was inherently extractive .They extracted the labor and wealth of indians through taxation,which financed their military campaigns of 300 years against hindus and other muslim nawabs as well as an extremely lavish luxurious lifestyle.
Their legacy was a handful of monuments comprising of 3 major forts,several mauseums,several mosques,a discarded township,a victory massive gate and also a few gardens.They were least concerned about the polity's welfare and were certainly against hindus and sikhs,killing several sikh gurus and their kids.
Why the fuck were the majority population of Hindus being pussies for 300 years then?
Open YOUR eyes, ears, MOST OF ALL, YOUR MIND...
Don't worry it's no use they will always glorify invaders as they are them self invaders who not just conquer but also genocide the native Americans. So it's no surprise what they are doing 🤔 by this they are just justifing their own invasion
@@paulalexander5358open ur mind to evidence like revenue records, biographies of various rulers, traveller accounts, epigraphic, archeological, architectural etc.
What a moron
Hindutva losing their minds in the comments section over the mughals.
English subtitles please
Thanks to NCERT the Mughals will soon be history...future generations will know them in the passing, at least under that board.
Great insight from a European scholar. He must have done thorough research on this subject. One thing which needs to be corrected is religious views of Jahangir. He was not as pluralistic in religious matters as his father was. He did take interest in Hinduism but he was more of a critique than a fan. At one occasion, he painstakingly disproved Hindu priests claim about a bottomless holy pond. With the rise of Nur Jehan and her brother Asif Jah, Hindu influence in defence matters greatly declined. First half of 17th century was a period in which Mughal dynasty had no potential rivals. Mughals fully utilised that period of peace and prosperity and built lots of world-class buildings. We see lots of Mughal monuments that were actually built in that period. However, they still lacked in one thing i.e. scientific learning. There was a viable system of education but that system cannot be compared with school system of Europe.
Don't think there was any school system in Europe in 17th century.
@@piku7800 Yes, there was a school system in Europe. In addition to religious schools like Madrassahs , universal public education system came in the same 17th century. That foundation proved to be a launching pad for scientific discoveries of next century. Right at a time when 18th century India was presenting a scene of anarchy, war and lawlessness, Europe was celebrating achievements of its discoverers and inventors. For example, electricity was discovered in mid 18th century. Great scientist volta presented its theories in 18th century.Good thing is that those scientific discoveries didn't stay in Europe. People of other regions also benefited from new discoveries because Europeans had reached in almost every continent of the world. That's why I maintain that colonisation proved as blessing in disguise for people of Asia and Africa. For example, Railways were primarily laid for military purpose ( Refer British expedition in northern Africa) but it became public property once peace was established in those regions. Similarly, Telegraph system in India saved British Raj (when a timely message from a telegraph operator alerted other regions and reinforcements came just at the right time -Refer Mutiny of 1857), but later on telegraph or telephone became a public property.
A new William panel!
.
28:00 Goa
.
Babur with young boys, another peaceful showing the way
Why people always talk about Mughals?
There was people here before Mughals. It is like historian wants to white wash our history before Mughals.
There was a great civilization in south India.
There was Punjab empire.
There was Maratha empire.
There was Ashoka empire.
EXACTLY undue importance to Indian hating people
WEALTH - Gold precious stones & artistic skills...that's why the Moguls came!!...even Alexander 300 BCE set out for INDIA - BUT the elephants in armor were terrifying even for The Great one
Why are you watching this.
Watch something or read something else.
Refresh your algorithm.
Y u read modern physics chemistry bio history anthropology n use modern tech like mobile n internet without shame n disgust.
There r a lot of things in world studies in organised way. Different things r studies by different ppl. He's a historian guy from the 7-8 to 17-19 century of India like they're r many for different times of history.
It is true that a lot is written about Mughals. It’s also true that lot more historical records about Mughals are available to write history about them. But then why some two hundred years history of Babur to Aurangzeb are given as much space in text books compared to other periods under empires that were as strong? Ask NCERT of yesteryears
Not any mention of the destruction all the universities , destruction of epistemology, and monistic ontology
highly recommend...read his books re last mughal....and his opinion of clive as a sociopath. hopefully you may think differently
Bengal Hindu king destroyed Buddha's tree in Sarnath... RSS and BJP won't mention that...
are you serious one possible anecdote that has never been substantiated against 40 thousand temples destroyed r every university destroyed and the minks killed you have perverted mind to compare that Buddhism is a part of sanatan dharma not different
it is you jihadis and and r
be colonialist christians who used divide and rule
grow up and read up on Himdu and Buddhist ontology and epistemology
it is ignoramuses like you who hold India back
Subject is Mughal Period.... Others history is also on record...you should attempt to talk about them.
Bhagva bots out in force in this forum.
If the mughals were as ruthless as the BJP depicts....India could not have remained a hindu majority country.The bankers in India were always Hindus and Rajputs their military commanders.Its the peasants who felt the might of the power and Hindu caste system which forced the lower classes to convert to Islam.
A point many fail to grasp. Hindustan was a join collaboration between Rajput warrior groups and Turkic tribes an warrior clans from central Asia. What we call India today is in essence an Indo-Muslim nation.
you can equate all you want but in essence, hindustan and bharatvarsha are not the same.
" Tel lagalo dabar ka " comment below 🙏
The bagpiper gaffot!
I salute this historian for his honesty unlike the Sanghi Brahmin and Sanghi Hindu who are distorting history for their dominance and exploitation
Freedom of speech existed..
India is richer and better because of all the Muslims dynasties and Islam's influence. Other than the Adivasis, most Indians trace their origins to migration from other lands. Almost EVERYONE is a foreigner. Kingdoms and empires were bloody - these were absolute rulers, not liberal democrats, be it the Mughals or any Hindu maharaja. Thank you, Dalrymple.
this is what is called 'circlejerk'....
Europeans telling Indians India’s history. Lol
Well I don't think there is anything wrong about that. I teach Greek history even though I am an Indian.
.
where does the geography of Hindustan or Bharat or India or Republic of India... begin or end...
@@muditchaudhary7255 There is a BIG difference. Indians narrate history, Europeans tell history.
Indians don’t have the history of distorting European or Greek history.
Now, Europeans will be allowed to meddle in India’s history.
@@ricardoafonso7563 Geography is not relevant. It’s the cultural India in whose boundaries we are interested.
@@muditchaudhary7255 Indians narrate other peoples history, they don’t misappropriate it. Europeans have done the later for over 300 years now.
This guy is just obsessed with Mughal history. Nothing else.No takers in his own country , so he comes to India to fool everyone.We should give no importance to him. After all who is he ? Writers like him are found a dime a dozen. And he needs to realize that you can fool people sometimes not all the time.
YOU ARE SPOT ON
This Dalrymple is a Scotsman, a non- entity, who has an inferiority complex because his tiny country is colonised & ruled for more than 300 yrs by the English until this day.
To run salt to the wound, Scotland continues as a colonialn entity within Britain governed from London only because of billions of £s annual grant from London ( Westminster
Central govt )....
This Dalrymple therefore has an inferiority complex & he therefore incarnates on the Hindu soil & glorifies Muslim Mughal rulers & thus makes Hindus feel inferior....the naive, gullible Hindus, themselves already
having an inferiority complex due to savage, exploitative British colonial rule, readily oblige & give Dalrymple a VIP treatment
equivalent to that they used to give to their Viceroy of colonial India....
Having acquired subtle psychological control & superiority over the Hindu minds, Dalrymple now has the audacity to produceb& present above video obsessively glorifying barbaric Mughal muslims & totally ignoring these Mughal monsters's destruction & desecration of Hindu temples, rapes, forced conversion of Hindus etc
This Dalrymple us NOT a friend of Hindus...he should be made to feel extremely uncomfortable in India .
This should br deported promptly & sent back to his native Scotland
If he had any sense of fairness & obligation towards Hindus who have given him so much hospitality & made him feel at home in India, you would think, he would research into the history & architecture of Hindu temples, other ancient Hindu monuments & the Vedic culture & religion, discoveries in Science, Mathematics, Medicine, astronomy etc ...
But no...Dalrymple is NOT interested in researching & glorifying pre Mughal ancient Hindu India...He is just obsessed with Mughal Muslim rule & he knows that that's the only way he can have control ovet Hinfu minds as well as prevent or delay the ascendancy of India ( under Modi rule ) as an emerging global economic, technological, military & spiritual power ( the latter already commands strong cultural influences globally across the world )...
Hare Krishna
Bharat mata ki jai
11 Nov 2024
Hare
Williams is a great historian
Under the Muslim rules, the Indian subcontinent truly flourish,was 25 percent of the world GDP, after the Muslims it is never the same
And before the muslims, it was 30%.
Moghal empire❤ The golden period of Indian History.
Bulshit...
Pakistan Zindabad ❤
Isme Pakistan kaha se aaya ??
@@swapniltiwari2470 This is why pakistan is going around with a Begging Bowl Begging for money 😉
William at his succint best
Glorifying mughal Invaders who Slaughtered Millions of Hindus and Destroyed thousands of Hindu Temples is shameful.