I wild camped with some friends in a remote location not too far from there. 3 tents in a large crater. Plenty of animal bones lying around. Middle of night i heard a humming noise hovering directly above my tent. Not heard anything like it before, like a throbbing noise. I was too scared to leave my tent. After around 30 seconds, it moved above my friends tent, then moved to the third tent. Then disappeared. In the morning i asked friends if they heard anything strange and they both said, “what you mean the UFO??” Both were too scared to leave their tents. I tried to record the humming on my phone and when i played back in morning, no sound. All very strange. Coordinates here. 54.19500° N, 8.70716° W
It’s a shame the hum didn’t come out on the recording as we may have been able to determine a frequency or harmonic & from it which may have been a clue. These things seemed curious as to the presence of campers in tents (which were approached in their own time) and yet were perhaps disturbed & scared off by the presence of the drone operator. Perhaps a nights camping there along with a skyward pointing camera is in order to see if anything comes calling again? The only other things I can think of were something akin to a more intense earthquake light i.e. generated by movement in the bedrock. Or, as some have speculated about orbs, souls of the departed (as many died thereabouts) trapped in the area? They say energy cannot be destroyed, only converted to other forms? Interesting stuff.
What would be cool.... put the Mavic in the same location filming same direction. Then fly a fast FPV drone from the same location where the UAP came from. It would make for interesting comparisons because the FPV drone's speed and size will be known values.
It is hilarious to see such goings on about such an obvious uap. These can be filmed in the daytime anywhere you are. 4k@60fps and your cellphone and any airplane/ airliner makes it very easy to do.
You may have an extra significant figure in the time calculation, I don't now how precise all the equipment is. Still, a minimum of 300 mph. The real kicker though is it came up from the ground and accelerated to that speed so quickly!
You should see all the orbs I’m catching at our airport (YYC) here in Calgary. White bright orbs against blue sky, flying everywhere. Definitely not bugs. I zoom in on them at home on iPad and WOW amazing capture. Also getting flashes of what looks like portals in the blue sky! Truly amazing! The world isn’t as we were taught about it. The truth is coming of what lurks in our seas, lakes and forests! ~Calgary, Ab
Hello Jimmy, this video review is well done and leaves no room for doubts even the most creative ones. That said, I have a question that maybe Aran can answer, since he says that he usually frequents the area where the video was taken: did he return to that area? Knowing approximately where the objects were, did you check if there was any trace that could indicate what they were doing there? Why the hell were they there, is there little more than grass in the vicinity, or is there some military or industrial installation in a slightly wider area that could justify the interest in being there? And it's also not one of those cases where it's customary to say that they were there "to be seen".... Congrats and Thanks
Boom! Fantastic analysis, seen anomalies like this before here on RUclips, also they captured lights going in and out of the ground on Skinwalker Ranch, maybe they are connected to missing 411 events.
Great work Jimmy, especially highlighting the shadow which was hard to see without stepping through the video. Also props to you for taking time to do this even though you've got some reading to do! 👀 😉
Great video, putting some info together and taking the time to help people grasp it.. People can try and convince themselves it's insects all they want, I'm fine with that, as long as nobody is trying to say 2 good lads like yourselves are trying to deceive anyone.. Still an cool bit of footage. Cheers mate👍
Interesting how close they were to Aran, like they were interested in him, but then got spooked by the advancing drone. And by the way, these objects aren't rare. Lots of drone operators catch them zooming by like this. Similar objects are caught buzzing by planes and other manned aircraft. They don't seem to have a static shape to them.
They are very close aren’t they. If you watch the original video the day before I posted you’ll see another 3 not much further away. Obviously he didn’t see any of them because they were so fast and he was viewing things through the screen in his goggles. But really weird stuff
@@Pure-Luck447 If you take UFOs seriously at all, you quickly end up with credible reports of "Hitchhiker Effect" by UFO investigators, which can manifest as haunted-house paranormal stuff. The obvious hypothesis is the phenomena investigates the investigators and might also try to deter further investigation through scare tactics.
These unknown objects are small and not insects. They have been seen all over the world and appear to travel at extreme speeds. Some kind of monitoring devices.
One thing I've never seen is a shot captured with one of those ultra speed Phantom cameras. I know it's hard to capture because they record thousands of frames and you'd have to record for a long time, ending your memory card very fast. But...I think someone can try multiple shots in some intervals. We might get lucky and see what those things are very sharply.
Thats an incredible catch to see the shadow of a head-sized object, travelling at over 450km/per hour! When I heard that pathetic argument (re the shadow 'should' be there) I just laughed. I thought no way could that small an object cast a discernible shadow....but there it is! Bravo! This very much reminds me of the Beaver Utah footage from 2016.
PARALAX! , you canot tell what point over the ground an object in the sky is . Even more so when you dont know what size it is . I learned this from trying to spot land RC aircraft from a distance - and i knew exactly what size my aircraft was.
Agreed, flying my drone at the beach it’s impossible to tell when it’s directly above something eg shoreline. The only way is to face the camera straight down. Personally I think it’s lens flare, an internal reflection in the optical train as it’s flying towards the sun and over water.
Does it seem like the object rises from the ground, levels out and accelerates? If so, your speed estimate would be a lower bound; it must have been going faster when it passed the camera.
I was definitely conservative with the figures. Intentionally didn’t address the flying against the wind which would have added the drag and made them even faster/more powerful. Then there is the g force, the moving from a standstill instant acceleration etc. the maths in that would have made it a pretty long video, but I think as soon as I got the 485.55mph it felt like it had resolved the ‘is it an insect’ question ha ha
It was an aerogel drone. Go to Korea UFO with Josh Bertrand. Go to RUclips for Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal for his interview with Salvatore Pais about his 4 US Navy patents stay on RUclips for Professor Simon Holland he isn’t a professor but has good information
I did it this way when I first saw the video. Average walking speed 5kph or 1 meter per second. Subject covers +- 200 metres in 1 second =447.38726 Miles per Hour +- give or take 10% error in distance estimation etc.
There was a couple which were dubious, but the main ones that were a light colour clearly were not bugs as you could see the shape and colour at distance. They were far too fast.
@@petemitchell2124 I agree. More so because during the entire footage in the uncompressed format (RUclips’s horrible for that) not a single insect body part seen on any of the 7 objects seen. And the camera records for quite a while. And you’ll notice that everyone who says you can see wings is unable to actually say when, within the footage, they actually see them. Which suggests to me cognitive dissonance 🫣
great video, but it is 100% insects. I'm not one of those people who "debunks" for the sake of debunking. But I come across them all the time and they are easily recreated. There was even a phenomena 20 years ago called "flying rods" you can look it up. People were filming rod shape objects with 4 or 6 or 8 sets of appendages, classifying them as a new type of animal. It wasn't until experiments were done filming insects on 2 cameras simultaneously. One with a higher frame rate and a normal camera. On the camera with the high frame rate you can see an insect flying, flapping its wings in slow motion. On the normal camera you could see that the artifacting was elongating the insects body making it long and cylindrical and making it look like it had multiple appendages. At 1:07 you can clearly see the classic "flying Rod" image showing that it is in-fact an insect with the blur on either side indicating flapping wings. Given that its 1 camera, its not possible to accurately gauge the size or distance, let alone speed. That's why cameras that are meant to judge distance and speed use a 2 lens system.
Thanks for your thoughts. That’s appreciated, but it seems like the slight blur on one side, which isn’t recognisable as a wing in my opinion, just a slightly different blur at a different frame. Which doesn’t counter the shadow it creates. I appreciate the shadow isn’t as noticeable after RUclips compression, but I can still see it as the object moves across in the forward/reverse shot I put in (even from iPhone screen now) so I just can’t put more weight behind a slightly different blur holding more weight than the location it seems to come from also having a shadow as it flies over. That’s two data points essentially corroborating eachother. Versus a blurry bit.
This is as good as YT channel Brian Hanley UFO footage taken by a drone operator. Please take one minute to go to the channel and watch the INCREDIBLE footage, lots of data and research done. I would love to hear your thoughts on it.Thank you
I have called these things 'Sliders' for over 20 years, they are everywhere all the time and look like a cork screw or rubber band unwinding at a constant high velocity, however they move that fast we can't as humans pick them up with our eyes as our brains cannot process the information, you can catch them visually if you blur your focus or if the sun is in your eyes I first noticed them opening my eyes while sunbathing on a beach in Spain.. Based on your analysis there must be some way to catch one of these things in flight..
Whoever said those are flies have HUA, those are definitely not bugs. This reminds me of a similar sighting in utah a few years back, was also drone footage
Hi Jimmy. If you’ve not talked to him already, reach out to Patrick Jackson author of Quantum Paranormal. He will be very interested in this footage as they look and behave like the sentinel spheres / orbs that he has studied in great detail
They are aerogel drones. Go to Korea UFO with Josh Bertrand then go to RUclips for Theories is Everything with Curt Jaimungal for his interview with Salvatore Pais about his 4 US Navy patents. Stay on RUclips for Professor Simon Holland his isn’t a professor but has good information
An average speed of 485 mph....from stationary and presumably silent, as Aran wasn't aware of the objects at the time. It would require an extremely high end camera to capture a good image. It may be some time before we're wiser to what these objects are....makes life interesting though !
Very interesting footage. Curious how deep those lakes go…perhaps deep enough for something much bigger to hide? I say this bc the UAP in this footage- reminds me a bit like some of the early lunar landings & flyover footage…with the tiny objects suddenly shooting off from the lunar floor, as if sent to investigate the arrival of the strange visitor from Earth (being NASA/Astronauts). Or perhaps that’s just where my coo-coo brain takes me lol 🤷🏻♀️
I have drone footage of these things. I think it’s reflection light which moves very fast. I have filmed in slow motion and these things shoot past very fast whilst motorway cars doing 70mph look very slow.
This is so far from science it's not funny. Why are you using a zoomed in, cropped image version of the video to determine when the object reaches the drone? Why are you approximating distances and time rather than counting frames? Why aren't you sharing the video file, or at least the metadata from the video file? It's silliness. Anyone who's flown one of these machines has seen insects on their viewfinders, or in their videos, and they look exactly like this. Why are you ignoring the vast numbers of experienced videographers telling you that what you're seeing is not unusual?
No views to be had from from that buddy 😂 besides you have to remember there are literally millions of people who believe everything their favourite RUclipsr tells them!
These have been around for a long time. There was a mainstream cable 4:11 show about them many years ago. They were theorized as inter dimensional objects. I have tried to research to find the show but have not been successful. They were labeled something like “zerts” or similar spelling.
🛸🛸🛸…..Well thought through with great analysis of the available data. Whatever these objects are it’s certainly very strange. Thanks for this… love your work 👽👽👽
Please if you can buy a 1000 fps 4k/8k cam and go back to this area. it is arround 4k$. or maybe rent it , the drone will not be able to lift it . Saddly without such kind of cam it will remain uncertain.
Great detailed work, all from a video. I'm with ya, it's not bugs or birds. See if you can isolate an image from the video and then run it though some AI enhancement? I know UAP-FILES had deep pockets for such research 😝 Seriously, well done here boss.
At the 2:03 mark of this video, for a fraction of a second, whatever that was that shot upwards diagonally from the right side of the screen absolutely is NOT a drone.
Has anybody tried shooting an airsoft rifle at a similar drone and and tried recording it? I am curious how would that bb look flying past in a similar trajectory. I am not saying the ufo is fake or anything, but thats the first thing that came to my mind.
interesting video but unfortent im not convience its a ufo , what i seen at 1st glace was a model jet plane or drone shaped like a jet then starting thinkin its camera trickery and there just bugs
@@DanFrederiksen help me out with how you’ve concluded its a 485MPH bird? No one said it was a 10+ meter ET ship. Not anyone in the comments and not me in the video. The estimation was around or a little smaller than the pilots head. Drone sized. Thanks for your comments.
@@UAPFilesPodcast I did not conclude such speed. you did. it's a monocular perspective, you have no explicit depth. so you cannot assume distances travelled. there was a very similar video by a drone photographer in very similar lighting conditions and it was also considered if it could be a fast ET ship. But it was a bird and what looked like it came in from far away was actually because it entered the sunlight. Notice that even when the closest it's a small blurry smear and fits a flat white configuration like a soaring white bird. All their motion is ballistic as well. Birds don't hover. ET ships do. I'm guessing if you look at all the footage the drone pilot shot there will be clips where it's obvious that white birds fly around
All BS and thanks for the subliminal message of the BS book over your right shoulder. Seen alot of these videos and you guys are always selling something. All about the money. Total BS.
Where are the arrows pointing to all the other artefacts that are also there on that grass bank? Isn't this just the grass moving in the breeze? Occam's razor; looks like many small insects in a breeze. Not multiple UAPs. These small objects (insects, dandelion seeds) are very close to the drone. Also, the shadow (if it was there) would follow the vector of the object. This is very mundane footage if seen through a dispassionate eye. I believe this also damages the integrity of what is an important subject. See how Dandelion seeds seem to disappear from view just a few second in this clip. then imagine a drone traveling at 26mph through them. ruclips.net/video/tLKrwJsvumE/видео.htmlsi=m8IOW0ClhT6cCIh6
@@TheMacbatts have to agree to disagree on this. The shadow is significant as the object moves over that section of land. A shape is shown on the ground. Perhaps it’s better for me on a big screen in uncompressed RUclips format, but even on RUclips replay I can see it quite prominently. I appreciate that if we remove this piece of corroborating data (that corroborates where the objects appear from and thus giving us out starting coordinates for all of the sums) then this can be discredited, but there is a shadow there that’s significant and only in such a large body distortion on the ground when the object moves over.
@@UAPFilesPodcast The trouble is now you're so invested in it being UAPS that there's no way back for you. Even the spooked UAP theory doesn't fit as things can be seen moving in all directions, including one going the other way towards Arin. Plus the video I clipped in has not been addressed as a possible reason as it blows your theory into the lake (at low altitude into the water) ruclips.net/video/tLKrwJsvumE/видео.htmlsi=1ua_SwTBJIAmoScx
@@alexpage7292 Alex, can you help me out with a timestamp for where you can see wings? I’ve watched the original (uncompressed) footage on a large high def Mac screen in mega zoom and see no wings during any of the footage. Even the footage not used in the podcast or analysis video. I appreciate you believe it’s a fly, but help me out with a time stamp ha ha
Your Math is also wrong. The converging speed of two aircraft is: Object 1's speed + object 2's speed. Not minus. Thats 228 mtrs per sec. or 9.5mtrs per frame of Video if its 24fps. The last frame before it leaves the edge is a clue as a bigger object would leave a longer trail in the frame. Hence a smaller object closer, going slower. As in this video ruclips.net/video/tLKrwJsvumE/видео.htmlsi=pqhkasZP-jfgVEUE
That’s incorrect. One craft heading towards another craft, you take away the one crafts speed, not add it. If the drone was heading away from the other object then you would add it. But this was heading towards it.
its also called the Kinematic equation, if two objects move toward each other at a constant speed they meet in the middle. If one was fixed, it would take longer for them to collide. This is basic stuff that you don't seem to understand.
Where do you see the use of Kinematic equations? In Air traffic control. To avoid mid-air crashes. Your mistake would have Aircraft falling into the Sea.
@@pitchforksarecoming Firstly I’m not a debunker I’m a believer. Secondly these rods were proved to be insects years ago. Where has everyone been? 🤦🏻♂️
![Diggy Graves - Red Vineyard [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8Ro085T0mnQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I wild camped with some friends in a remote location not too far from there. 3 tents in a large crater. Plenty of animal bones lying around. Middle of night i heard a humming noise hovering directly above my tent. Not heard anything like it before, like a throbbing noise. I was too scared to leave my tent. After around 30 seconds, it moved above my friends tent, then moved to the third tent. Then disappeared. In the morning i asked friends if they heard anything strange and they both said, “what you mean the UFO??” Both were too scared to leave their tents. I tried to record the humming on my phone and when i played back in morning, no sound. All very strange. Coordinates here. 54.19500° N, 8.70716° W
Wow! Thanks for sharing. Did you ever hear it again and did your friends have an opinion then or since?
@@UAPFilesPodcast nothing like it since and not been to ireland since. (Live in north wales), however we often ask each other what was it?
You maybe need to organise another camping trip with IR cameras set up.
It’s a shame the hum didn’t come out on the recording as we may have been able to determine a frequency or harmonic & from it which may have been a clue.
These things seemed curious as to the presence of campers in tents (which were approached in their own time) and yet were perhaps disturbed & scared off by the presence of the drone operator.
Perhaps a nights camping there along with a skyward pointing camera is in order to see if anything comes calling again?
The only other things I can think of were something akin to a more intense earthquake light i.e. generated by movement in the bedrock.
Or, as some have speculated about orbs, souls of the departed (as many died thereabouts) trapped in the area? They say energy cannot be destroyed, only converted to other forms?
Interesting stuff.
It would have been a drone
I absolutely LOVE the depth of analysis and data here mate. This is the reason you're my favourite source of this stuff. Outstanding.
Thanks brotha! Appreciate that. I felt I needed to just to put it to bed. Then I can move one 😅
What would be cool.... put the Mavic in the same location filming same direction. Then fly a fast FPV drone from the same location where the UAP came from. It would make for interesting comparisons because the FPV drone's speed and size will be known values.
Keep at it. Always remember that it is much easier to debunk after a 2 second viewing than doing the in depth research.
Very cool capture. Loved it
It is hilarious to see such goings on about such an obvious uap. These can be filmed in the daytime anywhere you are. 4k@60fps and your cellphone and any airplane/ airliner makes it very easy to do.
Great calculations, that uap is literally ballistic! MUFON needs to investigate this area and case further!
Keep posting mate!
You may have an extra significant figure in the time calculation, I don't now how precise all the equipment is. Still, a minimum of 300 mph. The real kicker though is it came up from the ground and accelerated to that speed so quickly!
Great work - thorough, data driven, scientific. Case closed.
You should see all the orbs I’m catching at our airport (YYC) here in Calgary. White bright orbs against blue sky, flying everywhere. Definitely not bugs. I zoom in on them at home on iPad and WOW amazing capture. Also getting flashes of what looks like portals in the blue sky! Truly amazing!
The world isn’t as we were taught about it. The truth is coming of what lurks in our seas, lakes and forests!
~Calgary, Ab
Why don’t you upload and share with us otherwise it’s just word salad
@@sasquatchyyc would love to see these captures
Hello Jimmy, this video review is well done and leaves no room for doubts even the most creative ones.
That said, I have a question that maybe Aran can answer, since he says that he usually frequents the area where the video was taken: did he return to that area? Knowing approximately where the objects were, did you check if there was any trace that could indicate what they were doing there? Why the hell were they there, is there little more than grass in the vicinity, or is there some military or industrial installation in a slightly wider area that could justify the interest in being there? And it's also not one of those cases where it's customary to say that they were there "to be seen"....
Congrats and Thanks
Boom! Fantastic analysis, seen anomalies like this before here on RUclips, also they captured lights going in and out of the ground on Skinwalker Ranch, maybe they are connected to missing 411 events.
Class. Taking no prisoners with this depth of analysis, no?! Spot on imho J.💯❤🔥
@@billhoward6926 🙏 Thanks Bill! I needed to make this video so that I could move on, for my own piece of mind ha ha
Great work Jimmy, especially highlighting the shadow which was hard to see without stepping through the video. Also props to you for taking time to do this even though you've got some reading to do! 👀 😉
Ha ha, thank you! The reading behinds sooooon. Can’t wait!
Your analysis is fantastic! This is getting very exciting. 👏👏
@@shaburkesharon8882 thank you. Appreciate that. 🙏
Great video, putting some info together and taking the time to help people grasp it..
People can try and convince themselves it's insects all they want, I'm fine with that, as long as nobody is trying to say 2 good lads like yourselves are trying to deceive anyone..
Still an cool bit of footage.
Cheers mate👍
@@mickd8188 ah thank you Mick. Appreciate that!
Interesting how close they were to Aran, like they were interested in him, but then got spooked by the advancing drone.
And by the way, these objects aren't rare. Lots of drone operators catch them zooming by like this. Similar objects are caught buzzing by planes and other manned aircraft. They don't seem to have a static shape to them.
They are very close aren’t they. If you watch the original video the day before I posted you’ll see another 3 not much further away. Obviously he didn’t see any of them because they were so fast and he was viewing things through the screen in his goggles. But really weird stuff
It's mixing into the Paranormal for me.
@@Pure-Luck447 If you take UFOs seriously at all, you quickly end up with credible reports of "Hitchhiker Effect" by UFO investigators, which can manifest as haunted-house paranormal stuff. The obvious hypothesis is the phenomena investigates the investigators and might also try to deter further investigation through scare tactics.
A moment of silence for all the nahsayers on every single uap videos complaining about being blurry and unstabilized.
@@JeffTheFlame 👍👍
These unknown objects are small and not insects. They have been seen all over the world and appear to travel at extreme speeds. Some kind of monitoring devices.
They don't want to be seen clearly that's for sure
One thing I've never seen is a shot captured with one of those ultra speed Phantom cameras. I know it's hard to capture because they record thousands of frames and you'd have to record for a long time, ending your memory card very fast. But...I think someone can try multiple shots in some intervals. We might get lucky and see what those things are very sharply.
5:46 please can you highlight the shadow because i dont see it at all
dude these are metallic spheres there is now so manny examples of these objects being fillmeed
Naah… still bugs… shadow isn’t shadow… it’s a vid pixelation effect… great channel… 👍😊
The one that flies at the drone seems to have been resting on the ground it raises up and changes direction. Its quiet fascinating. Mind boggling
That's incredible video I have never seen that before I wonder if you go back if you have the same experience
Thats an incredible catch to see the shadow of a head-sized object, travelling at over 450km/per hour! When I heard that pathetic argument (re the shadow 'should' be there) I just laughed. I thought no way could that small an object cast a discernible shadow....but there it is! Bravo! This very much reminds me of the Beaver Utah footage from 2016.
@@wimmeraparanormal6581 appreciate that!
Excellent video thanks!
Glad you enjoyed it. 👍
great background music! Every ufo movie should take your lead
PARALAX! , you canot tell what point over the ground an object in the sky is . Even more so when you dont know what size it is . I learned this from trying to spot land RC aircraft from a distance - and i knew exactly what size my aircraft was.
Agreed, flying my drone at the beach it’s impossible to tell when it’s directly above something eg shoreline. The only way is to face the camera straight down.
Personally I think it’s lens flare, an internal reflection in the optical train as it’s flying towards the sun and over water.
Does it seem like the object rises from the ground, levels out and accelerates? If so, your speed estimate would be a lower bound; it must have been going faster when it passed the camera.
I was definitely conservative with the figures. Intentionally didn’t address the flying against the wind which would have added the drag and made them even faster/more powerful. Then there is the g force, the moving from a standstill instant acceleration etc. the maths in that would have made it a pretty long video, but I think as soon as I got the 485.55mph it felt like it had resolved the ‘is it an insect’ question ha ha
It was an aerogel drone. Go to Korea UFO with Josh Bertrand. Go to RUclips for Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal for his interview with Salvatore Pais about his 4 US Navy patents stay on RUclips for Professor Simon Holland he isn’t a professor but has good information
The main one comes from the grass just below and it's movement is odd and looks staggered. You could not see an insect at its origin point, surely.
Let hope more people channels investigate this footage and people investigate the location. Thanks
Excellent video!
@@alryan8609 🙏👍
Was a video years ago showing things described as rods, same looking white fast moving objects, worth a search.
Recon drones from a mother ship UAP, seem to be a very common sight around the globe these days. Or are they operated by tiny ETs ?🤔.
Like I said on the first video, check out UAP Dragons, they check out flying things.
I did it this way when I first saw the video.
Average walking speed 5kph or 1 meter per second.
Subject covers +- 200 metres in 1 second =447.38726 Miles per Hour +- give or take 10% error in distance estimation etc.
@@lifewithherbthedog6509 sounds reasonable maths to me. Thanks
There was a couple which were dubious, but the main ones that were a light colour clearly were not bugs as you could see the shape and colour at distance. They were far too fast.
@@petemitchell2124 Frame rate, simple as that.
@@petemitchell2124 I agree. More so because during the entire footage in the uncompressed format (RUclips’s horrible for that) not a single insect body part seen on any of the 7 objects seen. And the camera records for quite a while. And you’ll notice that everyone who says you can see wings is unable to actually say when, within the footage, they actually see them. Which suggests to me cognitive dissonance 🫣
Fly the drone low over a field full of insects and you'll see this effect every time. If you get a few hours of fly time, you'll figure it out.
@@timchapel77 Yep! 👍🏻
ruclips.net/video/tLKrwJsvumE/видео.htmlsi=m8IOW0ClhT6cCIh6
Isnt all the telemetry data embedded in the original video file? It should have gps, speed, altitude and other data. Or download the flightlog.
And should be using the time plugin for vlc to get more accurate timing data.
great video, but it is 100% insects. I'm not one of those people who "debunks" for the sake of debunking. But I come across them all the time and they are easily recreated. There was even a phenomena 20 years ago called "flying rods" you can look it up. People were filming rod shape objects with 4 or 6 or 8 sets of appendages, classifying them as a new type of animal. It wasn't until experiments were done filming insects on 2 cameras simultaneously. One with a higher frame rate and a normal camera. On the camera with the high frame rate you can see an insect flying, flapping its wings in slow motion. On the normal camera you could see that the artifacting was elongating the insects body making it long and cylindrical and making it look like it had multiple appendages. At 1:07 you can clearly see the classic "flying Rod" image showing that it is in-fact an insect with the blur on either side indicating flapping wings. Given that its 1 camera, its not possible to accurately gauge the size or distance, let alone speed. That's why cameras that are meant to judge distance and speed use a 2 lens system.
Thanks for your thoughts. That’s appreciated, but it seems like the slight blur on one side, which isn’t recognisable as a wing in my opinion, just a slightly different blur at a different frame. Which doesn’t counter the shadow it creates. I appreciate the shadow isn’t as noticeable after RUclips compression, but I can still see it as the object moves across in the forward/reverse shot I put in (even from iPhone screen now) so I just can’t put more weight behind a slightly different blur holding more weight than the location it seems to come from also having a shadow as it flies over. That’s two data points essentially corroborating eachother. Versus a blurry bit.
@@UAPFilesPodcast It’s not just me then? Haha it’s not a UAP Jimmy!
@@KittWindlow Bang on! 👍🏻
Naah… still bugs… shadow isn’t shadow… it’s a vid pixelation effect… great channel… 👍😊
The ol’ Rods days… 👍🤣
Its like the "rods" everyone was recording.Turned out to be insects.
I'm a disc golfer (clearly my name is Hyzer after all) 😂but I cannot stop picturing someone over the hill throwing a disc.
Lol
also i think the shadow would be really hard to see as it would be pretty well diffused
Much more prominent in the uncompressed version and on a big good quality screen.
This is as good as YT channel Brian Hanley UFO footage taken by a drone operator. Please take one minute to go to the channel and watch the INCREDIBLE footage, lots of data and research done. I would love to hear your thoughts on it.Thank you
I have called these things 'Sliders' for over 20 years, they are everywhere all the time and look like a cork screw or rubber band unwinding at a constant high velocity, however they move that fast we can't as humans pick them up with our eyes as our brains cannot process the information, you can catch them visually if you blur your focus or if the sun is in your eyes I first noticed them opening my eyes while sunbathing on a beach in Spain..
Based on your analysis there must be some way to catch one of these things in flight..
Whoever said those are flies have HUA, those are definitely not bugs. This reminds me of a similar sighting in utah a few years back, was also drone footage
If you watch Joe Rogan’s Interview of Louis Elizondo, there is a UAP that was under water going over 500mph. Interesting interview.
Yeah I saw that. Fascinating stuff. I wanna see that photo!
well done sir I enjoy your videos🛸
Thank you 🙏
Hi Jimmy. If you’ve not talked to him already, reach out to Patrick Jackson author of Quantum Paranormal. He will be very interested in this footage as they look and behave like the sentinel spheres / orbs that he has studied in great detail
What was the rate of acceleration from 0 to when it passed the drone in G's?
Good question. I haven’t don’t those calculations. But would have been impressive
They are aerogel drones. Go to Korea UFO with Josh Bertrand then go to RUclips for Theories is Everything with Curt Jaimungal for his interview with Salvatore Pais about his 4 US Navy patents. Stay on RUclips for Professor Simon Holland his isn’t a professor but has good information
The groovy music gives your fine analysis an upbeat flare.
Why thank you good sir. Very kind.
An average speed of 485 mph....from stationary and presumably silent, as Aran wasn't aware of the objects at the time. It would require an extremely high end camera to capture a good image. It may be some time before we're wiser to what these objects are....makes life interesting though !
Thanks Jimmy …the true anomaly is …supposed ‘debunkers ‘though lol….
Very interesting footage. Curious how deep those lakes go…perhaps deep enough for something much bigger to hide? I say this bc the UAP in this footage- reminds me a bit like some of the early lunar landings & flyover footage…with the tiny objects suddenly shooting off from the lunar floor, as if sent to investigate the arrival of the strange visitor from Earth (being NASA/Astronauts). Or perhaps that’s just where my coo-coo brain takes me lol 🤷🏻♀️
@@SortaIrish79 interesting! I’m not sure of the depth unfortunately. Very interesting theory though. Thanks for sharing 👍
It’s most likely an visual artifact due to camera used
I have drone footage of these things. I think it’s reflection light which moves very fast. I have filmed in slow motion and these things shoot past very fast whilst motorway cars doing 70mph look very slow.
A radiator cover has appeared 😊
@@steveemmett-inotherwords 😅
This is so far from science it's not funny. Why are you using a zoomed in, cropped image version of the video to determine when the object reaches the drone? Why are you approximating distances and time rather than counting frames? Why aren't you sharing the video file, or at least the metadata from the video file? It's silliness. Anyone who's flown one of these machines has seen insects on their viewfinders, or in their videos, and they look exactly like this. Why are you ignoring the vast numbers of experienced videographers telling you that what you're seeing is not unusual?
No views to be had from from that buddy 😂 besides you have to remember there are literally millions of people who believe everything their favourite RUclipsr tells them!
These have been around for a long time. There was a mainstream cable 4:11 show about them many years ago. They were theorized as inter dimensional objects. I have tried to research to find the show but have not been successful. They were labeled something like “zerts” or similar spelling.
🛸🛸🛸…..Well thought through with great analysis of the available data. Whatever these objects are it’s certainly very strange. Thanks for this… love your work 👽👽👽
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it. 🙏
Clearest case of swamp gas!
The other thing at 780kph speed it should have caused a sonic boom, but typical of UFOs they defy gravity.
Please if you can buy a 1000 fps 4k/8k cam
and go back to this area. it is arround 4k$.
or maybe rent it , the drone will not be able to
lift it . Saddly without such kind of cam it will
remain uncertain.
Great detailed work, all from a video. I'm with ya, it's not bugs or birds. See if you can isolate an image from the video and then run it though some AI enhancement? I know UAP-FILES had deep pockets for such research 😝 Seriously, well done here boss.
Cool
❤️🔥👽🔥❤️
Top podcast in there with Vetted and The Good Trouble Show 👽👽
At thank you. Too kind.
At the 2:03 mark of this video, for a fraction of a second, whatever that was that shot upwards diagonally from the right side of the screen absolutely is NOT a drone.
Absolutely a ROD, at exactly 2:03. Good work.
@@tonyorob agreed. Not a drone.
Has anybody tried shooting an airsoft rifle at a similar drone and and tried recording it? I am curious how would that bb look flying past in a similar trajectory. I am not saying the ufo is fake or anything, but thats the first thing that came to my mind.
I saw your shadow.)
@@WaterSourcer 👍👍
Why the background music
So anyone know what is it???
It looks like a rod to me.
What's a rod?
The baseball player?!
They are Rods. Watch clips of rods on tube and you will see they match the largest UAP that fly's to the right of the drone.
The rods were not insects..they were critters
Wingless flies ..you wouldn’t want one to hit you at that speed lol..is that mick wastes position White flies?
interesting video but unfortent im not convience its a ufo , what i seen at 1st glace was a model jet plane or drone shaped like a jet then starting thinkin its camera trickery and there just bugs
It's a bird. do better. if there was a 10+ meter ET ship, you'd notice
@@DanFrederiksen help me out with how you’ve concluded its a 485MPH bird? No one said it was a 10+ meter ET ship. Not anyone in the comments and not me in the video. The estimation was around or a little smaller than the pilots head. Drone sized. Thanks for your comments.
@@UAPFilesPodcast I did not conclude such speed. you did. it's a monocular perspective, you have no explicit depth. so you cannot assume distances travelled. there was a very similar video by a drone photographer in very similar lighting conditions and it was also considered if it could be a fast ET ship. But it was a bird and what looked like it came in from far away was actually because it entered the sunlight. Notice that even when the closest it's a small blurry smear and fits a flat white configuration like a soaring white bird. All their motion is ballistic as well. Birds don't hover. ET ships do. I'm guessing if you look at all the footage the drone pilot shot there will be clips where it's obvious that white birds fly around
Looks like another drone to me
You guys are too UFOs!
There’s also another vid of a similar object doing the same fast speed taken by a drone
Defence orb
All BS and thanks for the subliminal message of the BS book over your right shoulder. Seen alot of these videos and you guys are always selling something. All about the money. Total BS.
Where are the arrows pointing to all the other artefacts that are also there on that grass bank? Isn't this just the grass moving in the breeze? Occam's razor; looks like many small insects in a breeze. Not multiple UAPs. These small objects (insects, dandelion seeds) are very close to the drone. Also, the shadow (if it was there) would follow the vector of the object. This is very mundane footage if seen through a dispassionate eye. I believe this also damages the integrity of what is an important subject. See how Dandelion seeds seem to disappear from view just a few second in this clip. then imagine a drone traveling at 26mph through them. ruclips.net/video/tLKrwJsvumE/видео.htmlsi=m8IOW0ClhT6cCIh6
@@TheMacbatts have to agree to disagree on this. The shadow is significant as the object moves over that section of land. A shape is shown on the ground. Perhaps it’s better for me on a big screen in uncompressed RUclips format, but even on RUclips replay I can see it quite prominently. I appreciate that if we remove this piece of corroborating data (that corroborates where the objects appear from and thus giving us out starting coordinates for all of the sums) then this can be discredited, but there is a shadow there that’s significant and only in such a large body distortion on the ground when the object moves over.
@@UAPFilesPodcast The trouble is now you're so invested in it being UAPS that there's no way back for you. Even the spooked UAP theory doesn't fit as things can be seen moving in all directions, including one going the other way towards Arin. Plus the video I clipped in has not been addressed as a possible reason as it blows your theory into the lake (at low altitude into the water) ruclips.net/video/tLKrwJsvumE/видео.htmlsi=1ua_SwTBJIAmoScx
Plus why are some going slower and more floaty...Did those Aliens miss a gearshift in their hast to move off!
Can literally see the wings beating Jimmy. You’re wrong on this, please please research rods.
Can’t see any known insects falling in to the bracket of 400+mph.
That’s bull mate A Rod? Is that another type of ufo or what?
@@ned1621 That’s Bull and then you ask what a Rod is? 🤦🏻♂️
@@alexpage7292 Alex, can you help me out with a timestamp for where you can see wings? I’ve watched the original (uncompressed) footage on a large high def Mac screen in mega zoom and see no wings during any of the footage. Even the footage not used in the podcast or analysis video. I appreciate you believe it’s a fly, but help me out with a time stamp ha ha
Nah man, that's a Shirt Jacker
Got loads of em round me Uncle's Farm
Your Math is also wrong. The converging speed of two aircraft is: Object 1's speed + object 2's speed. Not minus. Thats 228 mtrs per sec. or 9.5mtrs per frame of Video if its 24fps. The last frame before it leaves the edge is a clue as a bigger object would leave a longer trail in the frame. Hence a smaller object closer, going slower. As in this video ruclips.net/video/tLKrwJsvumE/видео.htmlsi=pqhkasZP-jfgVEUE
That’s incorrect. One craft heading towards another craft, you take away the one crafts speed, not add it. If the drone was heading away from the other object then you would add it. But this was heading towards it.
@@UAPFilesPodcast no you dont! its the reason a head on smash is much worse. your making yourself look silly now.
its also called the Kinematic equation, if two objects move toward each other at a constant speed they meet in the middle. If one was fixed, it would take longer for them to collide. This is basic stuff that you don't seem to understand.
Where do you see the use of Kinematic equations? In Air traffic control. To avoid mid-air crashes. Your mistake would have Aircraft falling into the Sea.
Call me cynical, but why would a UAP fly towards a drone? It doesn't make any sense.
@@56Gumball there’s a lot in ‘UFOlogy’ that doesn’t make sense.
😂😂😂😂
Tooth fairy?
If you debunked the debunkers before they debunk, is it a prebunk?
😂
@@pitchforksarecoming Firstly I’m not a debunker I’m a believer. Secondly these rods were proved to be insects years ago. Where has everyone been? 🤦🏻♂️
The aliens must be really small to fit in such tiny UAPs.
As tiny as the operator of the drone that captured this footage. Obviously!