Is the Swedish JAS-39 Gripen a Russian Fighter Jet Killer?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 ноя 2023
- The Saab JAS 39 Gripen is a Swedish fighter aircraft that has captured the imagination of aviation enthusiasts and military experts alike. With its sleek design, advanced technology, and remarkable performance, the Gripen has earned a reputation as one of the most capable and versatile multi-role combat aircraft in the world.
Support us:
RUclips : @USDefenseNews
Facebook : / usdn.official
Instagram : / us_defensenews
If you have any problems viewing this Video, please report it here: usdn.official@gmail.com 
Наука
Sweden has a long tradition of creating great fighter jets.
Big respect from France
Same can be said of France. I think the Dassault line and the SAAB ones have always felt like there was a common sense of design between them. The Rafale is awesome.
Respect from Sweden
Thank you ! 👍 @@user-ws5zu8jt8c
Thanks! SAAB was founded 1937 as an airplane manufactorer. There are older companies but SAAB for sure has a long history now.
Raphael ain’t half bad…
Big respect for you aswell brother 🇸🇪 🇫🇷
For such a small country with a small military budget Sweden produces so many top tier products. Even the US uses alot of their stuff from rocket launches to radars for ships.
@@Hrotiberhtaz Aaah, that explains why we "neutrally" transfered germans through the country towards Finland/Norway borders by train. Neutrality is is a good thing to stand up for, but in this case it's just BS. Fkn read up on facts ffs! Even the fkn swede king at the time was nazi. Bet thats wikipedia facts you're on about.
@@Hrotiberhtaz One correction, it was internal political desires to lay down the nuclear arms program in Sweden, not pressure from the US. US was against providing any kind of help from 1956 to 1959, when suddenly talks about possibly circumventing the selling of plutonium to Sweden from the US started. There was more or less a done deal and we had already been supplied with a bit of plutonium from the UK and another country that I can't remember on the top of my head.
But yes, overall the US wasn't very happy about it.
@@coffzor123sweden made its own plutonium, later shipped to the UK for disposal/storage. We made around 850 kilos of it in Oskarshamn 1, all of it ended up at sellafield for storage when our nuclear weapons programme was cancelled
”Rocket lanchers” and radars for ships.? Pls!
we produce Quality before quantity
Swedish jets have been designed with the main purpose of countering Russian air force since before the Cold war and Soviet era. That's one of the reasons you can land it on a decently big highway, rearm, refuel and take off before most people have the chance to check their social media while taking a shit. 😂
Badass fighter jet. The SAAB Viggen in traditional camo is the most beautiful fighter jet Sweden ever has produced though.
Viggen is beautiful but I beg to differ. The E version of the Gripen with the m90 pattern in grayscale (ranging from light gray to very dark gray) is my favourite, also the E version is a bit beefier in the airframe so the big landing gears (for rough terrain) looks better in proportion, plus the extra hardpoints. I'm no fan of the digi-camo though.
But who knows what FMV will chose in the end, only two delivered for evaluation so far with 60 in the total order.
Who can survive in stoneage tech?
@@persika.r34 I agree with you, i didn't see the pictures of the Gripen E until yesterday and i loved it's new look after the slight changes. The modified airframe did indeed indeed make it look better proportion-wise:)
@@MrMandelll Whomever hast the most sticks and stones!
Its a tough fight between the Viggen in camo and the JAS39 E, which one is more beautiful but the modified E-version as well as becoming a bit bigger than 39 A-D versions are much more similar to Viggen and I like that.
Vigen was a beast. Brutal force. In comparison, Gripen is more like a sportscar. But the E/F version brings back some of the brutal force. Bigger airframe and more weapon capacity, with all the modern stuff to make it protect itself and take down any targets. And integrated with all weapons you can come up with. And if not, SAAB will do that in a flash.
I think you mean Viggen
We'll see, soon enough.
Different times, different needs. The Viggen was a brute, intended to rush in at high speed in complete radar and radio silence, almost invisible at treetop level in fog or rain, perform just one maximum effort strike and then try to get home again. No finesse or elegance, just one unexpected, gigantic and lethal hammer blow.
The Gripen is a much more elegant team player designed for a modern electronic collaborative war situation.
What a bully thing to do, totally switching things. Imagine entering the octagon and seeing the 300lbs slugger you fought last time transformed into a 160lbs Judoka.
It can pack Meteor without any messing about. There is no escape from meteor once it's launched, and it has a longer range that AMRAAM.
That was the fate with the Dinosaurs.
Love this Aircraft 🇨🇦
JAS 39 Gripen, as well as JA 37 Viggen, JA 35 Draken, A 32 Lansen and J29 Tunnan; all designed to defeat and knock out the air force of our historical arch-enemy Russia.
Well, and what's the result?)))
@@user-th2jm9gu7o Stas, here you get a straight answer. The result of a strong Nordic defence / air force was and will be that you Soviets / Russians have never had the opportunity to dominate the airspace over the Nordics and the Baltic Sea and now do'nt have the will and possibility to do so either. Your technology and training are not sufficient for air supremacy. Furthermore, Stas, it also turns out that your missile systems are also inferior in comparison to the Nordics and the West.
A good Russian is a Russian who is ashamed, regrets his behavior and learns to behave like a good person. You Russians still have a lot to learn and understand about humanism, cooperation, progressive thinking and common security. The ideals of the Stalin and communist era are still all too attractive in the RF: tsarism, megalomania, twisted nationalism, kleptocracy / imperialism and childish machoism. The Russian Federation's alcohol abuse, drugs and corruption are also destroying you. Poor education in the countryside lowers you. Putin is the road to Russia's downfall.
@@user-th2jm9gu7o That russia/soviets never dared to invade Sweden.
@@user-th2jm9gu7opeace for Sweden. So worked out well.
@@user-th2jm9gu7o Stas, here you get a straight answer. The result of a strong Nordic defence / air force was and will be that you Soviets / Russians have never had the opportunity to dominate the airspace over the Nordics and the Baltic Sea and now do'nt have the will and possibility to do so either. Your technology and training are not sufficient for air supremacy. Furthermore, Stas, it also turns out that your missile systems are also inferior in comparison to the Nordics and the West.
A good Russian is a Russian who is ashamed, regrets his behavior and learns to behave like a good person. You Russians still have a lot to learn and understand about humanism, cooperation, progressive thinking and common security. The ideals of the Stalin and communist era are still all too attractive in the RF: tsarism, megalomania, twisted nationalism, kleptocracy / imperialism and childish machoism. The Russian Federation's alcohol abuse, drugs and corruption are also destroying you. Poor education in the countryside lowers you. Putin is the road to Russia's downfall.
For you non Swedish speaking out there, the JAS in JAS Gripen stands for Jakt (Hunt), Attack (obvious even in Swedish) Spaning (reconnaissance)
And Gripen is Swedish for Griffin
@@Hobs55679no?
@@Hobs55679it stands for ”arrested” 😂
Like most Swedish product's they are of ultimate quality and standard that certainly goes for military products to.
Btw. It's NOT pronounced "Grippen"
It's like Griipen!
Something like the first three letters of grid and add the word pen. [gri]d + [pen]
gree - pen is better to explain for the english folks.. gree as in greed
more like greepen
Yes, exactly lika "GREEEAPEN" (Somewhat sligthly overpronounced)
((☺️))
Th. Benjaminsson * 🇸🇪 *
@@Thbenjaminsson gree'pen
The perfect fighter really for the Philippine Air Force. I just hope they don’t get suckered into buying the F16.
They probably will. Knowing how the us do deals
@@viggomernelius4568 they might get both, with 2nd hand F16 though in the future under a separate acquisition with US help. For now Philippines will get the Gripen E first
i love the Gripen, it may not have the lowest buy cost but it is the best bang-for-your-buck in terms of operating costs for multirole jet fighters!
New challenge: take a shot every time he says "Bronk said"
"Is the Swedish JAS-39 Gripen a Russian Fighter Jet Killer?" Well it is designed to be just that. soooo. i assume it will do that pretty well, but we dont know yet.
Most likely. At least for the foreseeable future. In reality, it's also about training and tactics, something we've seen Russia isn't very good at.
I do know I'll take Swedish engineering over Russian engineering any day.
Designed and built in Sweden,so it will most probably do just that.
I don't understand why not more countries have bought this jet. The quality and performance seems to be top notch and the price of the jet itself and the cost maintenance seems to be really competitive.
I mean not all nations needs super expensive F-35 to guard their airspace.
Because sadly. our ally and friend USA plays dirty when it comes to competing for contracts. Lockheed martin and the US even did espionage on SAAB and Sweden, trough Denmark when Lockheed and SAAB was competing to sell to Norway. It was quite a big scandal back then. Ironically, people was more angry with the Danes that let US spy, rather than the US. Kind of like everyone expects US to do it. They can't help themselves :D But Denmark is suppose to be our brothers. Anyway, it's all forgotten now. And SAAB Aerospace is rather healthy economical anyway
American coruption
Same case with Indonesian AF interest this jet, USA will do everything to make this fighter jet failed to get contract.
US domination still involve unfortunately. 😢
@@MrFelixify SAAB also pulled out of the race somewhat early on in Denmark, which ended in the purchase of the F35. Their stated reason was that it was rigged in favor of the F35 and they where not given a fair chance. I'd much have preferred the Danes to go with SAAB as opposed to Lockheed Martin.
just look at how it went for jas39 gripen, on the read flag exercises
it has not gone well for the opponent who faced jas 39
Orc slayer, made for the one and only enemy - The orcs.
Stay in your basement, or get back to ukraine. Lots of room in the trenches.
@@bjabbbjabb1286 Even more and more !
It has a role to fill: Dispersed defence where the border is long and major airfields few and far between. Fits in like a glove in Ukraine as well.
It won't replace the F35, but the most important thing right now is to make more of them.
hmmm demonstrates a very small rcs so little difference
@@alpearson9158 And what do you mean by "rcs"? Rich communication services?
draken means dragon, witch is also the swedish word for "KITE" since it resembles a kite, and Viggen means bolt as in Thunderbolt...
The Viggen has a double meaning just like the Draken.
It can both refrain to Thunderbolt and Tufted Duck. The later are a reference to the shape of the planes canard wings that have the shape resembling of the named ducks beak.
@@MrPirreE no
remember back in the 1980s when four of Swedish pilots saved an American blackbird coming out of the Soviet Union?
yep... that was the Viggen tho
What story is this?
@@waltertanner7982 Google Swedish Viggen pilots escort American sr71
It’s a beautiful fighter jet.
This is the absolutely sensible path to have taken. Sure the US loves its headline stealth projects, almost boasting about how much it costs, but in the highly evolving world of Cold War tactics, electronic warfare is where the battle is being fought, and Saab leads the way with the Gripen series………..a fabulous aircraft! It doesn’t need to be the biggest, fastest or stealthiest…….it just needs to win!
well that is the stength of all of Swedens companys. SAAB, Volvo, Koenigsegg, Scania and more is in constant change of going forward. Trying new ways to solve problems.
Imagine Christian von Koenigsegg working with Gripen development...
@@robertkristensson5644from What i read is that koeningsegg was involved in designing the stabilisation system for CV90 allowing it fire with precision in full speed.
I could be wrong but….
Its so damn stereotypical to know that if a American narrator or channel executive begin talking about fighter a.c. that somewhere you will get the sound of stealth a.c. Stealth isnt really the holy factor of air supremacy if you take price tag and new radar tech into account.
It has been shown time and time again that stealth gives you a massive advantage. A plane with an RCS of an insect will always be vastly more difficult to track and engage, regardless of what imaginary radar tech you might have in mind.
You might add that Global Eye can see the F35 even in stealth, so all it needs is one Gripen that gets the target on the link and kaboom the F35 with a meteor before the F35 can see the Global Eye or the Gripen.
Silly person, if radars can pick up stealth at ever greater distances, what does that mean for non-stealth airplanes?
Stealth will always be an advantage as long as radar is the primary mode of detection. Pretty easy concept.
And the Gripen is as good an airplane as exits in the fourth-generation, but it is not an F-35 and would be at a disadvantage against one.
@@wadopotato33 A Good awack has other ways and sensors to pick them up mate. Radar is not the only way to detect a plane. And Global Eye is state of the art, it is about data link from that to Gripen and a meteor missile that makes it possible.
At 3:37 there is a totally false statement that Gripen can only carry a few weapons. That is totally incorrect. It can carry more weapons than most fighter jets, since it can carry both US, European and Swedish weapons. The only weapon it can’t currently carry is nuclear bombs. The video is at 7:53 contradicting itself by stating that Gripen can fire almost any missile! 😂 Since it so flexible it was the first fighter that could carry the Meteor and it does it in full duplex mode an example. Multiple fighters can only communicate with the Meteor in simplex mode.
You sure he just didn't mean that the Gripen has fewer hardpoints and thus can wield fewer weapons at a time?
@@Bald_Zeus You need to be more clear in your statements. Gripen is one of the fighters that can can carry most different types of weapon. ”Gripen” has many versions that are different. Gripen A/B 6 hardponts, C/D has 8 hardpoints and E/F has 10 hardpoints BUT then it is important to know what is already integrated in the fighter. For example Gripen E has a very skilled Electronic Warfare system integrated, while many fighters need an external capsule on one hardpoint for similar functions.
The viggen was designed to carry nuclear weapons.
@@erikempire318 The plane that was really planned for nuclear missions was SAAB A36.
@@Bald_Zeus 10 hard points with no need for external EW-pods and a separate mount for guidance-pod.. I don't know, I find that pretty average and definitely not "few", but of course also not the most. When you then factor in the size of the air frame I would say 10 hard points is impressive if anything.
Why Canada rejected the Grippen is beyond me!
Politics and pressure from the US like alot of deals, I suppose Us needs to get the coast down and to support the Us company making money and also reduce cost for them selfs, lot of the deals is more about politics and pressure from a big player Like the US
All large deals of military material are quid pro quo, one country agrees to buy one thing in exchange for the other buying another. Sweden is notoriously stingy when it comes to quid pro quo deals. That being said Gripen probably wouldn't be ideal anyway, the main design philosophy behind the plane is that it can't be grounded by taking out the airfields as it can launch from roads and be serviced from a trailer. This is why it's so small and carries a smaller payload, but that also reduces its range. Canada is huge and has vast tracts of lands without any roads so it might be better serviced by a larger more long range plane.
the same reason they abandoned the CF-105 Arrow
@@danvernier198 Understood, but I think the Grippen has better range than the F35, and rough terrain capability is a range extender in itself.
politics my friend... Politics
The ideal jet for Ukraine, better than F-16 as it is more practical, not so sensible and better electronic, but not enough quantities
Ideal for most nations.
Only USA can defend the insane costs of f35.
Gripen is a smart platform, it can carry anything that is not to heavy. and that´s thanks to its Operating System. you could compare it with how Linux OS system´s works. with loaded modules in the software for every functions. instead of the Microsoft Windows way there all the functions are withing the same box / module in the OS.
thanks to that. it will not take long to make a new software module to the system so you can mount different hardware or weapons from different brands.
And then you have the software, you can load different modules for different missions and task´s and that is done in a few hours. so the same plane and fly two or more totally different missions in the same day and over a period of few days. one mission ground attack, next recon, and the third mission Air Combat.
there is what i know of, no other jet fighter that can do this officially.
That plane can appear as several hundred radar targets with it's latest adaptations of it's radar jamming capabillities
the Gripen would be perfect for Ukraine: multirole and able to use primitive facilities and short runways. With a NATO membership, our neighbour countries like Finland and Norway could help with protecting Swedish airspace while Swedish Gripens are in Ukraine.
So like always Finland could fight the wars for swedish while Swedes grill korv wayyy behind and after the war Swedes will come to tell the world how they were war heroes and won the war and they had little help from few Finns but Sweden was the main force and brain’s behind the every victory. 😂 But no Norway and Finns need to defend theyre own country. Ukraine should have invested to theyre own airforce at least after the 2014 Russian started the war. Just like Sweden should right now buy every military equipment they can. Sweden needs everything except airforce.
I agree. This seems like a no-brainer
I agree and wish we would offer Ukraine this. Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark have already joined our air forces into one single unit and command structure, not connected to NATO, so we wouldn't feel left without defense in any way, shape or form.
I approve of this comment 🇸🇪🇺🇦🇸🇪🇺🇦
Gripen kommer aldrig komma till Ukraina. De har redan förlorat.
That was an interesting your great sharing .
with ghosting you dont really need stealth. even so there are 2 stealth programs for new jets atm. Also since the radars employed by sweden can see stealth fighters at 0.7 of max range or thereabouts the turns would table as it goes.
Or you both ghost and are sthealthy
Gripen isn't getting sales because it doesn't have a helmet mounted display system like it's competition. SAAB needs to step up and install a working integrated system, not wait for a customer to place an order, then work on it.
SAAB needs to be flying with a working one in its advertising.
Fantastic !
Dont forget they one of the best submarines
I hope Ukraine will produce these domestically, just like Brazil has. Aparently, that actually also generated some new feature, that has become standard in all subsequent models. Ukraine's Antonov aircraft industry ought to be a good partner for SAAB?! And such a cooperation should also have a high probability of further sharpening it's anti-Russian-fighter capabilities.
In the short term, as Sweden becomes full member of NATO, other Nato countries should assume some responsibility for Swedish airdefence, in order to free up some Swedish Gripens to send to Ukraine. And then also crank up production.
These three measures could give Ukraine a decent number of Gripen airframes in this decade, also forming a good foundation for the longer future. AND it would also benefit Sweden!
Perhaps also other NATO countries, as recent wargaming on a Taiwan conflict showed 90% of US fighters would be destroyed before even leaving the ground. So one recomendation is going for larger numbers of somewhat cheaper airframes, instead of insanely expensive tech like F35, since most of that high tech will likely never have a chance to play out. Gripen is considerably cheaper to operate than F16 or F35, as I understand it. It stands to reason, that for the very small country of Sweden, maximizing "bang for the buck" has very, very high priority during the whole design process.
Yes it would be nice for Ukraine. A small agile fighter with short TO and LDG capability and also a digital warfare platform. The best advantage is the price
If the radar detects the enemy long before you is detected by the enemy, that is kinda stealth...
Yeah and the Gripen can also jam, clone itself on the radar, while sending this information to any other Gripen. It's insanely in its own competition
The highest command in Sweden proclaimed that the SAAB JAS 39 Gripen is a Suchoi killer, and over the Baltic Sea wear i live you can hear them play. A trou swede never uses big words, so when he says so it is a confirmed Suchoi killer
*where and *true...😊
@@AnnWahlquist om min bristfälliga stavning är det du ser, så beklagar jag
@@callelindqvist123 nej då, ingen fara... ville bara hjälpa till ..😁😁
It still has a small cross section.
Absolut yes!!
Happy Gripen. SAAB
wonderfull
*wonderful
Power Gripen
From Philippines
The F-35 is also using electronic warfare it is a flying supercomputer and it doesn't even have to open its weapons compartments it can fire missiles from a F-15 that's laying back undetected
Yes. The Ja37 Viggen could do that in the eighties with data link connecting 4 aircrafts. What do you think the JAS 39E can do now about 40 years later?
@@christofferlarsson8901 the F-14 Tomcat could Target 24 and shoot at 6 back in the seventies
That is very impressive!
But could it give the target to another Tomcat flying ”silent” without its radar on? because that was what you were talking about mentioning the F35 and its electronic abilities?
What a pity the narrator became inaudible and later faded away completely as the sound track of the video became more and more hypnotic.
considering russian jets sometimes kill themselves and get shot down by everything from Stingers to Patriots.....yeah...Gripen with NATO missile packages is a slayer of dragons.
Amazing aircraft. Canada should have bought this plane for its Air Force. Ukraine would do well to have a few of these planes in their arsenal.
Yes. Yes it is.
English speaking people should pronounce Gripen as Greepen. Not Grippen as in this video.
And of course there is no 'K' in the name of the Su planes.
If you want to say "JAS Gripen" like we do here in Swedish, pronounce it "the Yaas Greepen". ;)
Yes, yes it is.
Yes
Good to have different capabilities and approaches. Interesting that the F-35’s electronic warfare was omitted. Interesting data fusion and sharing was omitted. Any jet will be very effective against ground troops, it’s the bomb and missile which was delivered. Short runways and astute support always nice and more important in Ukraine. But, perhaps need a doubling of
Sweden’s Air Force to be a real factor in Ukraine, not just one or two. Nice video. Good to see the different focus spelled out.
Sweden currently have 100 Gripen C and have 60 Gripen E on order with a potential for a bigger order. I dont know what Swedish air force fighters and Ukraine Air force have in common though.
Great video! But once and for all, it's pronounced "Jaws Greepen" rather than "Jazz Grippen":)
Short answer: Yes.
Philippine Government buy the Gripen Jas 39E/F Jet fighter planes Sweden should partner with the Philippine Government by joint manufacturing and technology transfer. To beThe official Jet fighter of the Philippines.
Perhaps fighter jet pilot favors this plane than F-35.
the JAS is like the Borg (startrek) You might get one shot of before they adapt and cant be shot down hehe
The Gripen is perfect for Canada.
You dont need stealth if your opponent dont have a radar 🤷
Mighty Gripen E, little Putin beware! 💀💀💀
Sweden 🇸🇪👍💪👊
Both yes and no. It all depends on what kind of gear the plane has been equipped with. Etc.
You bet it will a russian jet fighter killer specially with pinoy pilot flying grifin hehe !
🤠😎😍😍😍😍👍👍👍👍👍
Gripen is serial killer of russian fighter jets .
I think any capable enemy jet is a nightmare for any plane, me said.
No has to be Gripen E to be succesfull against modern russian fighterjets (above enemy land).
This is kinda dumb. The idea that radars will be able to see stealth and therefore stealth isn't going to be a thing is silly. If radars become more effective and can see stealth easily they will also be able to see planes like the Gripen from even greater distances as well.
They also talk about the Gripen having excellent EW capabilities, but it is not like other planes don't also have good EW suites. The F-35 has an excellent EW package (in addition to stealth).
S300 food.
SAAB JAS-39 Gripen design specification: 1. be a Russian fighter jet killer, 2. be able to take off and land on country roads, 3. be served by as little as five conscripted soldiers, 4. be able to carry any NATO missiles up to and including the secret ultra-cataclystron-bomb.
All our Swedish made weapons are made to fight
against Russian equipment! We dont hve any other threats then
Russians, we got great submarines that is the crown jewel! :)
❤
* So, at last, Sweden has taken its Rightful seat amongst our close Friends, Allies and Partners within the North Atlantic Treaty Alliance - and - as I actually was born the very same year as when John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the Very Best American President since Abraham Lincoln, held his Historical speach about - quote - "We choose to go to the moon, and do the other things, not because they're easy, but because they're hard!" - and during all those years since then, throughout my entire life, I have carried such a strong, strong desire and living hope that, one clear day, Sweden as a Nation would become a full-fledged member of NATO! But I never really thought that I would live to see that clear day arrive, because of the political naivety behind the so called "value" of keeping ahold to the military neutrality for our Nations People, so firmly embraced for centuries.
But - suddenly - now, we have all seen the Historical change, the winds of our National People's will, to once and for all stand up strong for preserving Freedom and Western Democracy together with our Friends and Neighbours at LAST came! And here we are now! We are now fully Members of NATO! Good things come to those who can wait!
And now, the terrific JAS 39 Gripen E/F Jet Fighter - "The Beauty and the Beast" - Actually, the SAAB JAS 39 Gripen E/F Version is truly a splendid, awesome combination of both of them - in its very own, indeed unique manner and style - and as a Swede person, I really cannot deny that I feel a strong, genuine pride of our Military Air Industry, that has got the Technical skills, professionalism and Aeronautical knowledges and capability, to enable us to create this very unique and "hard-to-beat" fighter!
Bring 'em on, Mr Putin! Feel the Swedish steel bite you - really hard!
Th. Benjaminsson - 🇺🇲 * 🇸🇪 * 🇸🇪 * 🇺🇲 -
It seems all SAAB advertising!
No other countries want to buy the Jas39 gripen after Brazil because other countries much prepared the US and France fighters aircraft. Maybe the biggest obstacle to market Jas39 geipen is the intervention of some swedes politician in sale to other countries. Very big example is sale of 14 Jas39 gripen C/D using the existing spare airframe to the Philippines. MOU between Philippine and Sweden signed by both countries and awaiting for sweden to ratfy since last year. Sweden government and Saab will continue to lose their costumers to market their defense products if the sweden politician continue interven.
sweden cant rly sell gripen to other countries because of sweden is not in NATO but gripen still the most dvanced fighter jet ever made for now
@@CruLisP Most advanced when it comes to latest technology. I can agree to that.
but maybe not the most technically advanced aircraft. But that's almost always a good thing.
F-22 was very technically advanced, and that is why little Sweden manage to produce more Gripen then America made F-22's.
By the sound of it, it was an engineered nightmare on the production line with untested advanced materials and designs.
Every other month the F-22 needed something redesigned and so did the production line and rebuilding of all the aircraft's they made.
Even without redesigns, the aircraft was exceedingly laborious thing to manufacture. Condemning it to low production volumes and high cost.
F
@@2canines Froggy?
The best is .... Rafa
Deal Draken
Très très bon avion l'idéal pour l'Ukraine 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪 La Suisse aurait dû l'acheter plutôt que le F35...
It is all about mass. Do you want one F35 or two Gripen. For the same money and maintenance. And how do you expect to use them. Are you a Big country in the midtle of the passific or are you a country placed close to the enemy and expect them to bomb your landing fields so you need to use a highway.
Why wouldn’t you just buy the typhoon or a NATO built fighter or a fighter belts in the European besides like y’all should be collaborating together like look at this we got the typhoon. We got this. We had all the German fighters England, Germany finally clued in.
UK buy the Gripen I pay my tax its a no brainer
Did the mig-21 kill f-16 ????
Did Dassault-rafale kill f-22 ????
Did su-30 mki killed raptor f22 ????
All answers are YES....
😎😎😎😎
ok when and where ......oops !
@@alpearson9158 ask your mom
In Wargames but you need to know how USA go in to war game to loose like with the raptor half on EWS is disabled and they carry external tank and weapons that take away its stealth
@@japsracing959 no plane gets total invisible
Did Grippens dad Viggen kill SR-71 ???? Yes.
Gripen does not mean Griffin wtf
Edit: I stand corrected
It does in Swedish, it's a Swedish plane, Danes don't make planes.
@@danvernier198 i am literally Swedish my dude
You can literally search it up too. Gripen means “moved, touched” or “arrested, detained”
@@LemonAid82 I guess that you're a "Swede" who hasn't yet learned about bestämd form yet.
@@danvernier198 jag är helt dum i huvudet. Förlåt ;-;
Jag kollade upp det med ”bestämd form” och ”griffin” kom upp
Wonder how these would fare in Ukraine.
Wow 🤩usa 🇺🇸love ❤from India🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
i As a swede i now a lot of gripen c and e but i cant tell it cause of the laws of secret info. But i can say that gripen e is much better then su 35 and only su57 is maybe ??? a treat to gripen e. And i can also tell you that even the gripen c the one before the much better e version did very well in red flag in usa. So i can without telling secret things tell you that i estimate that one gripen e could destroy about 2 or 3 su 35 the bes russian fighterjet, and is probably?? as good as su 57. so its no risk that putin would dare to atack sweden with also worldclass subs and artillery archer and other secret weapons, and now we are in nato, so just a nordic coalition could with ease defend agains russia and even take away kaliningrad !!!!!
Gravity is a Russian Fighter Jet killer
It is pronounced with a " l o n g i" - like Griipen, got it?
Please try to pronounce words as meant. Not in us English. Just a matter of respect.
Why do english speaking countries and people have problem to say Gripen?
Why do they always say Grippen?
Vem fan bryr sig? Hur bra är dina thailändska uttal?
@@zoom5024 Verkar som du har ett väldigt seriöst problem!
@@zoom5024 Det är väl du som både har varit i Thailand och har en thai kvinna så hur är hennes uttal?
Jag har varken varit i Thailand eller haft en thaikvinna så den kommentaren kan du stryka!
Appreciate the video topic but half the video is just you repeating what has already been said in different ways. Low effort.
Isn't anything flying a Soviet plane killer?
No.
yes this figher is designed to kill russian planes with the komet. that is basicly the hole idea with it
Its an ANY fighter jet killer....get it?
Hier die 400 000 Battlefield Weltraum Raumschiffe sagst du Darcho Jandreoski zu Paul wenn du ihn da siehst Die Stadt Athen soll den Theater Ausmachen / Die sollen die BTM Fahrzeuge ausmachen Datum und Uhrzeit 18:30 meine Sicherung ist Over weil meine Weltraum Raumschiffe Kanonen sind Hot - - - - - - > ich bin Eingestellt zu Schiessen mit meine 400 000 Battlefield Space Ship Waffen Einstellung der Feuern meine Waffen Uhr 18:28 / 29 ( Datum 28. 11.2023 Einstellungen mit Space Ships Mitraljezi Turm mit Dauer Feuer in Planet Erde alter )
It means vulture not griffen
Haha, no.
@@JulianSlick175how do you know?
@@LemonAid82 by speaking Swedish, you know it's a Swedish plane right? The Danes don't build any planes. So in Swedish grip is griffin and gam is vulture while is Danish grif if griffin and grib is vulture. Well exemplified by the stereotypically Danish name Jens Pedersen.
@@danvernier198 tell me you aren’t Swedish without telling me you aren’t Swedish
Edit: nvm I’m sorry
@@LemonAid82 efterblivna byfåne.
Always that stupid music in the background. It's so disturbing that I shut this off.
Typical American thing.