Finally, someone said it... Adjust your mirrors properly, and blind spots are a myth. Thank you Brian!! It's easy when a car begins to leave your rear-view mirror, it enters the side mirror.
Love my 2024 Premium Mach E, not sure I would upgrade to a GT though. Definitely needs more range. My screen definitely has lag especially when using navigation or switching from nav to radio. And the blind spot on the rear view mirror when the visor is down is bad, the visor takes away about 1/3 of my rear view. I do love the car and would recommend it to a friend. I LOVE the look of the GT just not sure I would upgrade when the time comes due to the range. Definitely love the look of the Rally for sure!
Really eye catching in that green and bronze wheels. A refresh and still not as good range as Model Y. It was fast enough already. Would you take this over Explorer ST or a Tesla model Y?
Model Y performance vs this GT performance are advertised about the same in range (285, 280 respectively). I had a Y performance and it never actually got the 285 miles.. more like 230-250! Just got the 2024 Mach E GT performance, we’ll see in a couple drive cycles how close I actually get to the 280 range advertised. I do love that one pedal though.
2024 GT is on my short list. I do wish Ford had left out the Mustang and just called it a Mach-E, and that's not because it's an EV, it's because it's an SUV.
Having common controls on a touch-screen presents a safety issue. I can reach for climate controls and other common functions in my current vehicle without looking for them and without taking my eyes off the road by using feel/muscle memory. It's difficult if not impossible to do this with a touchscreen. It's also ironic that some new vehicles watch your eyes and lose their minds when you take your eyes off the road, yet move towards designs that - wait for it - force you to take your eyes off the road! I also don't understand why Ford had to make the "Mustang" Mach-E look like a Honda Accord Crosstour. ???
Never thought i would ever come to a place in my life where i would look at a Hyundai, and say "Yeah, i would drive that over a Ford any day"...but...here we are.
@@BrianMakse I was thinking more Apple's to Apple's with the Ioniq N. But if I had a choice between the Ioniq and the Elantra... Petrol wins everytime.
*we need to start a boycott and stop calling it a Mustang, its a insult to the Mustang heritage* jk... *yes, Mitsubishi, you too with your Eclipse CUV* hahaha...
I can't get excited about this car, no matter how many times I see one or watch a review. The styling just doesn't do anything for me. As for Ford calling it a Mustang, I think that was a huge mistake. The Mustang has a legacy, but it is also still being sold as an evolution of the car that started it all in 1965. To have THAT Mustang still being made and sold, and then have this vehicle come along with the same name, but a totally different design philosophy was just bound to fail. I think Ford should have released their first true EV with a new name to match. And the design "trick" of painting the awkward roofline black to try and make it visually disappear is another failure. Why not just design it with appealing lines, rather than design a turd and try to polish it? I know Mythbusters proved that you could polish a turd, but come on, that was lighthearted entertainment, not a $50k+ vehicle!
I built and just purchased this exact one after 2 years with a premium! Absolutely love the car!
Cheers! Enjoy!
Finally, someone said it... Adjust your mirrors properly, and blind spots are a myth. Thank you Brian!! It's easy when a car begins to leave your rear-view mirror, it enters the side mirror.
Glad you’re on board! Been saying it for years, even have a video on that here.
Love my 2024 Premium Mach E, not sure I would upgrade to a GT though. Definitely needs more range. My screen definitely has lag especially when using navigation or switching from nav to radio. And the blind spot on the rear view mirror when the visor is down is bad, the visor takes away about 1/3 of my rear view. I do love the car and would recommend it to a friend. I LOVE the look of the GT just not sure I would upgrade when the time comes due to the range. Definitely love the look of the Rally for sure!
Really eye catching in that green and bronze wheels. A refresh and still not as good range as Model Y. It was fast enough already. Would you take this over Explorer ST or a Tesla model Y?
1. Explorer ST
2. Mach E GT Performance
.
.
.
999. Any Tesla
Agreed, I would have love to see the interior in a shade of brown to match.
@@BrianMakse you are savage sir 😂
Model Y performance vs this GT performance are advertised about the same in range (285, 280 respectively). I had a Y performance and it never actually got the 285 miles.. more like 230-250!
Just got the 2024 Mach E GT performance, we’ll see in a couple drive cycles how close I actually get to the 280 range advertised. I do love that one pedal though.
Looks amazing
2024 GT is on my short list. I do wish Ford had left out the Mustang and just called it a Mach-E, and that's not because it's an EV, it's because it's an SUV.
Having common controls on a touch-screen presents a safety issue. I can reach for climate controls and other common functions in my current vehicle without looking for them and without taking my eyes off the road by using feel/muscle memory. It's difficult if not impossible to do this with a touchscreen. It's also ironic that some new vehicles watch your eyes and lose their minds when you take your eyes off the road, yet move towards designs that - wait for it - force you to take your eyes off the road! I also don't understand why Ford had to make the "Mustang" Mach-E look like a Honda Accord Crosstour. ???
Never thought i would ever come to a place in my life where i would look at a Hyundai, and say "Yeah, i would drive that over a Ford any day"...but...here we are.
I’d take an Elantra N over many Fords.
@@BrianMakse I was thinking more Apple's to Apple's with the Ioniq N.
But if I had a choice between the Ioniq and the Elantra... Petrol wins everytime.
@@bigbuckorammaindeed.
Overall not a bad vehicle, just a bad name.
*we need to start a boycott and stop calling it a Mustang, its a insult to the Mustang heritage* jk...
*yes, Mitsubishi, you too with your Eclipse CUV* hahaha...
Caling the Mustang II a "Mustang" was far more offensive than this.
I can't get excited about this car, no matter how many times I see one or watch a review. The styling just doesn't do anything for me. As for Ford calling it a Mustang, I think that was a huge mistake. The Mustang has a legacy, but it is also still being sold as an evolution of the car that started it all in 1965. To have THAT Mustang still being made and sold, and then have this vehicle come along with the same name, but a totally different design philosophy was just bound to fail. I think Ford should have released their first true EV with a new name to match.
And the design "trick" of painting the awkward roofline black to try and make it visually disappear is another failure. Why not just design it with appealing lines, rather than design a turd and try to polish it? I know Mythbusters proved that you could polish a turd, but come on, that was lighthearted entertainment, not a $50k+ vehicle!