2024 Mach-E GT: The Electric Mustang That Finally Lives Up to the Name?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 18

  • @kyleighbaxley7722
    @kyleighbaxley7722 25 дней назад +2

    I built and just purchased this exact one after 2 years with a premium! Absolutely love the car!

  • @jeffwertz2953
    @jeffwertz2953 25 дней назад +2

    Finally, someone said it... Adjust your mirrors properly, and blind spots are a myth. Thank you Brian!! It's easy when a car begins to leave your rear-view mirror, it enters the side mirror.

    • @BrianMakse
      @BrianMakse  25 дней назад +1

      Glad you’re on board! Been saying it for years, even have a video on that here.

  • @paulm6481
    @paulm6481 Месяц назад +3

    Really eye catching in that green and bronze wheels. A refresh and still not as good range as Model Y. It was fast enough already. Would you take this over Explorer ST or a Tesla model Y?

    • @BrianMakse
      @BrianMakse  Месяц назад +5

      1. Explorer ST
      2. Mach E GT Performance
      .
      .
      .
      999. Any Tesla

    • @Redmongoose-rdm
      @Redmongoose-rdm Месяц назад

      Agreed, I would have love to see the interior in a shade of brown to match.

    • @ruturaj47
      @ruturaj47 29 дней назад

      ​@@BrianMakse you are savage sir 😂

  • @sw_cdn
    @sw_cdn 29 дней назад

    Looks amazing

  • @mikewright2858
    @mikewright2858 Месяц назад

    Having common controls on a touch-screen presents a safety issue. I can reach for climate controls and other common functions in my current vehicle without looking for them and without taking my eyes off the road by using feel/muscle memory. It's difficult if not impossible to do this with a touchscreen. It's also ironic that some new vehicles watch your eyes and lose their minds when you take your eyes off the road, yet move towards designs that - wait for it - force you to take your eyes off the road! I also don't understand why Ford had to make the "Mustang" Mach-E look like a Honda Accord Crosstour. ???

  • @paulm6481
    @paulm6481 Месяц назад +3

    Overall not a bad vehicle, just a bad name.

  • @bigbuckoramma
    @bigbuckoramma 28 дней назад +1

    Never thought i would ever come to a place in my life where i would look at a Hyundai, and say "Yeah, i would drive that over a Ford any day"...but...here we are.

    • @BrianMakse
      @BrianMakse  20 дней назад +1

      I’d take an Elantra N over many Fords.

    • @bigbuckoramma
      @bigbuckoramma 20 дней назад

      @@BrianMakse I was thinking more Apple's to Apple's with the Ioniq N.
      But if I had a choice between the Ioniq and the Elantra... Petrol wins everytime.

    • @BrianMakse
      @BrianMakse  20 дней назад +1

      @@bigbuckorammaindeed.

  • @Slickpete83
    @Slickpete83 29 дней назад +2

    *we need to start a boycott and stop calling it a Mustang, its a insult to the Mustang heritage* jk...
    *yes, Mitsubishi, you too with your Eclipse CUV* hahaha...

    • @CIRCLEDARK
      @CIRCLEDARK 28 дней назад +3

      Caling the Mustang II a "Mustang" was far more offensive than this.

  • @RbNetEngr
    @RbNetEngr 10 дней назад

    I can't get excited about this car, no matter how many times I see one or watch a review. The styling just doesn't do anything for me. As for Ford calling it a Mustang, I think that was a huge mistake. The Mustang has a legacy, but it is also still being sold as an evolution of the car that started it all in 1965. To have THAT Mustang still being made and sold, and then have this vehicle come along with the same name, but a totally different design philosophy was just bound to fail. I think Ford should have released their first true EV with a new name to match.
    And the design "trick" of painting the awkward roofline black to try and make it visually disappear is another failure. Why not just design it with appealing lines, rather than design a turd and try to polish it? I know Mythbusters proved that you could polish a turd, but come on, that was lighthearted entertainment, not a $50k+ vehicle!