For my last email of 2020, I'm going to be analyzing my former PR 3x3 average of 7.02 seconds (got this like 2.5 years ago). Much has changed about my solves since then, so if you want the full analysis, sign up - www.jaydenmcneillcubing.com/newsletter
@@DeepakSingh-sh2lv I never learned the "real" Nb perm. I still use z U' R2 U [Jb] U2 R2 U. Not sure how much worse it is than the more conventional Nb alg. The only dot OLL I truly hate is the two cases with the lone corner solved.
Full ZB here. I've tested LSLL with full ZB vs LSLL with mostly insert into OLL+PLL (will only force EO if it's a really fricking good ZBLS, and only do TUL, 2GLL H and Pi and diag H and Pi ZBLL sets) for both OH and 2h. Here are some results. Keep in mind that I still need to optimize both recog and algs, although my OH algs I'd say they suit me quite well. 2h: Standard stuff: 4.55 mo280 ZB: 4.60 mo280 OH: Standard stuff: 6.74 mo280 ZB: 6.42 mo280 .
Just a question on VLS: is it more of an forced inverse sexy skip than an forced OLL skip? Some of the algs involve inserting the pair and doing the OLL (don't think it's a lot), and most of them (that I have tried to learn, which are either UB or UF stuff) have the same difficulty as regular OLL. Maybe you can make a similar video about how worth it is VLS?
I think he has talked about something similar about this, the cases where you just insert the pair and OLL are already the cases that aren't worth doing an alg. The main advantage I see with VLS especially if they are just as good/hard as OLL, is that you can recognize it earlier and some algs can be easy to recognize or easy to execute, so choose one of those when learning cases if you don't plan on learning all of it.
Do you have any advice for learning the proper ZBLL algs? For example in the cubicles recent video featuring Tymon, he shows Patrick Ponce a different alg for a ZBLL case (and breaks it down i.e. R2, F' (commutator) etc.. I was wondering if you have any advice for learning the proper ZBLL algs, so I don't waste too much time learning bad ones, I understand a big part of this is experience however. Ps. Also in the same video actually I believe Tymon mentioning you have a course, I was wondering where I go to purchase that.
For my last email of 2020, I'm going to be analyzing my former PR 3x3 average of 7.02 seconds (got this like 2.5 years ago). Much has changed about my solves since then, so if you want the full analysis, sign up - www.jaydenmcneillcubing.com/newsletter
@@DeepakSingh-sh2lv I never learned the "real" Nb perm. I still use z U' R2 U [Jb] U2 R2 U. Not sure how much worse it is than the more conventional Nb alg. The only dot OLL I truly hate is the two cases with the lone corner solved.
Full ZB here.
I've tested LSLL with full ZB vs LSLL with mostly insert into OLL+PLL (will only force EO if it's a really fricking good ZBLS, and only do TUL, 2GLL H and Pi and diag H and Pi ZBLL sets) for both OH and 2h. Here are some results. Keep in mind that I still need to optimize both recog and algs, although my OH algs I'd say they suit me quite well.
2h:
Standard stuff: 4.55 mo280
ZB: 4.60 mo280
OH:
Standard stuff: 6.74 mo280
ZB: 6.42 mo280
.
the cp recognition for sune is just as good as for U, L, T
ok tymon
@@6anial ok Dan
@@oscarmcevoy90 ok oscar
@@asr2009ok Sameer
@@matthewyeager9382 you ruined it. we were supposed to do this with first name not last name
👍👍 Jayden McNeil Ph.D in cubing
ZBLL is the best alg set and everyone should know it after OLL PLL COLL
Just a question on VLS: is it more of an forced inverse sexy skip than an forced OLL skip?
Some of the algs involve inserting the pair and doing the OLL (don't think it's a lot), and most of them (that I have tried to learn, which are either UB or UF stuff) have the same difficulty as regular OLL.
Maybe you can make a similar video about how worth it is VLS?
I think he has talked about something similar about this, the cases where you just insert the pair and OLL are already the cases that aren't worth doing an alg. The main advantage I see with VLS especially if they are just as good/hard as OLL, is that you can recognize it earlier and some algs can be easy to recognize or easy to execute, so choose one of those when learning cases if you don't plan on learning all of it.
Very informative video. Thanks!
Here is your fan from India 🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗
Best outros ever
you'll be using maybe 2/3 best algs when i finish my sheet :>
😮
y2 f R f' R2 u' R U' R' U R' u R3 U R' U R U2 l' L' B' L B' L' B2 L B2 x'
eww brother eww
H has really good algs these days
Even the diag can be timed in 1.1- 1.5
Especially the adjacent sets these days have really really good algs
One of my favourite zb sets
Do you have any advice for learning the proper ZBLL algs? For example in the cubicles recent video featuring Tymon, he shows Patrick Ponce a different alg for a ZBLL case (and breaks it down i.e. R2, F' (commutator) etc..
I was wondering if you have any advice for learning the proper ZBLL algs, so I don't waste too much time learning bad ones, I understand a big part of this is experience however.
Ps. Also in the same video actually I believe Tymon mentioning you have a course, I was wondering where I go to purchase that.
Did you see ? You are in CUBEHEAD's video
Thanks for this video! I’m just sub 13 but this vid helpful in the future
Hey, what’s up? What do you think are the best VLS sets to learn?
Jay, do you use rotationless insets in f2l such as r' U' R U M' often?
B' R B R'
f R' f'
I don't think he uses then as much because lately he is using set ups to FRUF' like for diagonal pairs, multisloting, maybe some Psuedo-F2L
@@Jj82op ok
@@charlesdaloz2547 tnul
Can you learn ols and do a video whether it is worth it or not.
U are really simmilar to Andrew Garfield
First
Nobody cares
@@hasnaincubes tru
Hakura the smh overuser.
@@the4amigos899 smh
@@Hakuraaa ok.