The pillar look great. Although it does look off because it's too plain. Making it a tunnel, I think, is too much . Maybe, if it's possible, make it look like vines are growing up the pillars. It would add color and plants to the area.
I replied to your comment while watching this video. I think I can explain better what you asked before, plus something other people suggested: - The elevated line is almost like I imagined it, the only difference is that I though both directions running along (8-stud gap between them), and placed exactly on top of the roads instead of on top of railroads, as this way you could save some support pieces, and avoid hiding the visibility of the road - at least from the angle you record it, it "disappears" a little - Maybe moving the bike lane to the opposite sidewalk would help it become more visible on videos too
Ahh...ok. The primary reason I'm running it over the ground line directly is because that way it won't take any additional room on the platform than the ground line already does. If I were to run it separately, I would lose more space for buildings and other structures. Unless you just meant running it over the road until the road runs out and then switching back over the tracks? I'm not sure how easy that would be either... I sincerely appreciate your input!
You might want to tack down the elevated line I f a jumper plate can line up underneath in an artistry’s or two. As for the curve that needs support why not do what you did over the road, but over the track?
Your solution for your angled elevated track looks great
Thank you, David!
The pillar look great. Although it does look off because it's too plain. Making it a tunnel, I think, is too much . Maybe, if it's possible, make it look like vines are growing up the pillars. It would add color and plants to the area.
That's actually a great idea! I may try that.
I replied to your comment while watching this video. I think I can explain better what you asked before, plus something other people suggested:
- The elevated line is almost like I imagined it, the only difference is that I though both directions running along (8-stud gap between them), and placed exactly on top of the roads instead of on top of railroads, as this way you could save some support pieces, and avoid hiding the visibility of the road - at least from the angle you record it, it "disappears" a little
- Maybe moving the bike lane to the opposite sidewalk would help it become more visible on videos too
Ahh...ok. The primary reason I'm running it over the ground line directly is because that way it won't take any additional room on the platform than the ground line already does. If I were to run it separately, I would lose more space for buildings and other structures. Unless you just meant running it over the road until the road runs out and then switching back over the tracks? I'm not sure how easy that would be either... I sincerely appreciate your input!
Love your elevated line work Andy...I'm basically copying 😝
Awesome! Thanks!
You might want to tack down the elevated line I f a jumper plate can line up underneath in an artistry’s or two. As for the curve that needs support why not do what you did over the road, but over the track?
I likely will do the same thing as I did for the road, but on a smaller scale.
Why not use the little 2x2 turntable pieces to connect odd angles of the curved tracks to the standard grid where they line up?
I have done that before but I kinda liked the suggested idea of just letting it sit on tiles and not connected. What do you think?
Personally not a fan of the sidewalk/bike path being blocked by the train support.
I''m not either but fortunately it's only blocking one out of four studs of the bike lane.