Please note that there was another Crusade at a later date (The Crusade of Varna) but I am calling this video the last Crusade as this was the last time in history where all of Christendom united
Not to mention India was fighting their own Muslim invaders, and China as well. In some ways China still fighting the invaders on their western borders.
@@getlost3346 hardly fighting. It is called genocide when you round up a whole population, the Uyghurs, using them for body parts, sterilising women, forcing women to have han husbands etc etc. All this according to the UN report that was written, but the third world run UN of course only cares if the West does anything.
@@getlost3346 The uyghurs aren't invaders, the turks lived in xinxiang before the chinese annexed it for the first time centuries ago. As for india the fight was a two way affair, the first muslim hindu clash was started by hindus when they kidnapped umayyad citizens. Furthermore the muslims later on were mostly desi in origin making them natives, not invaders. Even babur's own line was desi very quickly, so the gurkanis (mughals) were not foriegners a few sultans in.
The French were executed because Turkish Sultan Bayezid learned about the French massacre of Turkish prisoners from Oryahovo. Approximately 3000 Turks and other Ottoman subjects were slain by the French, despite surrendering to Sigismund on the terms that they would not be harmed. Sigismund himself was irritated by the dishonourable behaviour of the French. Once Bayezid got hold of the fate of the Oryahovo residents (likely from Hungarian/Wallachian prisoners), he ordered the French knights to be undressed to dishonour them. He had each knight tied to another knight, and had them march naked in rows of two. Each row was executed swiftly by decapitation once they reached the executioners. It is indeed said that he got sick of bloodshed and stopped the executions after around two thousand French knights were executed. The rest were marched towards the straits.
The French although the bravest and the heaviest in the crusader's side, because of their recklessness not only made the entire crusading army suffer but made the France suffer too in the 100 years war because of the same recklessly charge in the battlefield of Agincort and crecei
Disagreement The Crusaders didn't have victory anywhere close to their jaws. Granted, it would have been a much better battle. The forces were about the same. I can't believe those idiots actually dismounted and just went forward without any scouting. Very stupid behavior.
@@High_rise12 ummm... I do think that about the French, today. If there was ever a European country more deserving of a cursed wretched existence, it would be France and the French would revel in it, they really would. They'd probably be all snobby about it too.
@@josephjohnson5415 the french have one of the most impressive military records of any country on earth and where a military juggernaut for centuries. Try again
really enjoyed the thorough breakdown of the Nicopolis battle in this vid! however, i find it interesting that some historians downplay the significance of this battle in the greater context of the crusades. what do you all think?
Never knew about this battle. Very interesting and well made video. FUN FACT: Jean de Carrouges (depicted in the 2021 film THE LAST DUEL) was killed in this battle
Not to mention in many other nations. India was fighting their own Muslim invaders, and China as well. In some ways China still fighting the invaders on their western borders. Africa fell early to Islam which created slave trade.
@@gobanito In today's digitized age of the 21st century, people hear one or two facts, and think they have the correct conclusion! So I could say that the English and the French in the 20th century were fierce war enemies...that would be the case, if I took "Operation Catapult" from 1940, when the English sank the French navy, for the entire 20th century. in North Africa! Just as in that short period of the 20th century, the French (a small part of them, "Vichy France") and the English were enemies, so the Serbs and the Ottomans were allies for only 10-20 years. And 100 years before that alliance, and 500 years after that alliance, they were fierce enemies!!!
YET MORE self-evident proof that “Diversity is NOT our Strength.” 🙄 It’s UNITY… A commonality of purpose, identity & shared ideals, that creates strength, cohesion & camaraderie… & bolsters morale.
Common purpose, diverse contributions. The most decorated American units in WW2 were nisei (Japanese American) and the black Tuskegee airmen. America is formidable because it is diverse. Russia wants to divide us..
@@joeboyle5864 "Russia" is not the problem inside the U.S.; Cratzi Fascism is the problem. The Crats ( Biden and Harris etc. ) made up a lie about Russian "interference" and "collusion", then pumped 300 billion dollars in new revenue into the Russian economy in 2021 alone, as a payoff for their active, and passive, cooperation in the Collusion Hoax.
Walachians whas real front line soldiers,who fighted with Ottomans. And when they chossed to retreat,i think they acted good,because battle whas lost from start,and that Wallachian and Hungaryan units,most preserved for next battles. After that battle all Weast units go to there lands(if survived),and forget,but East units,continued fights and battes.
@@latexdrc Really!!! Not the russians, the chinese, or the iranians... Nope... sleepy joe is more arrogant than Putin....You must be a fine observer. Suggestion: pull off your head from your @55, you may improve your point of view a good deal.
The "Walachians" were în fact Romanians that could have won the fight, should French not have been French, just like they did at Agincourt, Crecy, second WW, etc.
You'd think armies that fought in the hand to hand era would be well aware of the danger of becoming over extended and exhausted in battle. Lost count of the number of battles I've seen turn around because of this. Probably very hard to stop men charging in when once it starts.
So it was the French knights insistence that they would not follow peasant infantry as the vanguard because it would be a dishonor. I play chess and that's not the way to open a chess game or a battle for that matter.
Hey, so I'm supposed to do this type of cinematic battle but for a documentary and in total war rome 2. What camera mods are you using? I really dont understand how you make it seem so good and how the camera seems so stable.
without armour the turks where much faster than french crusaders and did not get tired so easy on the battlefield ... the vallahian/romanian troops didn't use heavy armour neither; too bad, the pride one is always a looser doesn't matter the nationality !!!
@@mipmixchannel Bro with all my respect this is real time history not a strategy game like total war series, i am sorry but Ottomans had armour, especially the cavalry was heavily armoured, all infantry had at least partially chain mail arm. with breast plates, There is alot that i can write in detail but it will take so long and there is no point in it. Thank you for your comment and addition. Have a nice day.
As far as weapons, the French had the crossbow which did well in close proximity. The English were masters of the long bow which can be fired from a long distance, an immediate advantage
Noo bayezid died in captivity by timur. His Son mehmet 1 won the civil war and his son Murad also fought crusaders at Vanna then abdicated the throne to his young son Mehmet 2 fatih
Ма нека се западњаци носе у сто 3,14чке материне !!! Да су дошли (као што су обећали), 1389 на Газиместан (Косово), са озбиљном војском, око 30 000 ратника, Турци би били до последњег ратника уништени !!! Битка код Никопоља се НИКАДА не би догодила!!! Срби су се сами супроставили огромној армији Турака, наневши им огромне губитке а и сами пострадаше, остатак Турака је ПОБЕГАО са бојишта, вратио се у Турску, Србија је остала без тадашњег "крема" друштва (изгинуло у битци) а коју са севера напада Мађарска војска са Хуњадијем на челу !!! Недуго потом Србија постаје ВАЗАЛ Турској, да сачува круну и ситне привилегије, па је у обавези да Турској шаље одређени број ратника када Турска затражи!!! Тако је било и код Никопоља, где је српска тешка коњица разбила "крсташе", који су превасходно имали намере само да пљачкају (посебно Французи), баш као и у свим крсташким походима !!! Може да кења шта год ко хоће, чињенице су такве, а ИЗДАЈНИЧКАЗападна Алијанса се вековима труди да оправда недолазак на Косово, што је још једна огромна срамота, недостатак части, достојанства и морала!!!
there only 2 french commanders/leaders who have actually one battles. Charlemagne and Napoleon. ironically both arent natural born french, one is a germanic frank and the other a corsican.
all those victories and glories of muslim conquests lost in a dust as muslim kings fight eachother for land , gold and women. from Battle of Ankara 1402 , to the battle of Battle of Panipat 1526 and later on , muslim rulers fight eachother for power , destory and corrupt the enitre muslim world.
Holy, french arrogance costed thousands of lives and the whole campaing. It's a prime example why in the military hierarchy and discipline are paramount.
They could have won. They made too many mistakes. Anyway, Bayezid got what deserved in Ankara. Tamerlane totally destroyed himz showing who's the boss.
😂imagine only bayezid showed destroy all crusaders if him and other muslim had united they would’ve conquered whole world😀bayezid is the boss of christiendom
@izharulhaqtruthrevealed1185 boss? He got destroyed by Tamerlane. Mehmed tried to conquer the West, but couldnt even conquer Belgrade and Rodi... The ottomans always had numerical superiority but couldnt even conquer Austria. They tried two times... They failed.
@ 🤣yes but yet bayezid empire outlived Tamerlane. Imagine all Christians coalition defeated by just one Muslim empire. 😄😂if not timur bayezid would’ve crush remaining western 🤣west celebrates deafeat of bayezid at Ankara😩imagine even to this day Christians celebrate it like you😄 Had Muslim empires united all western countries would’ve been conquered
@@izharulhaqtruthrevealed1185 Thankfully, that never happened and Europe had a reformation and Western civilization dominates the world. Imagine if we were like, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia
Yes he was. I read a book about him with the the title Le bon Sire de Coucy. He died at Nicopolis as far as I remember, but not in the battle. The french nobles waited for ransom.
They were in France where they belonged. Told prince Charlie many times not to go to Scotland. Sensible. Line telling USA not to go to Iraq. Means you get called names. However means you don't spend three trillion dollars and leave a messed up situation.
@izharulhaqtruthrevealed1185 So why did they try in the first place ? 😂😂😂😂. Oh, and so did the Germans during the second World War. Malta is small, but 💪💪💪💪💪😂😂🤣😂
Isn't history marvellous? Two things in note was that Palestine didn't become a country until 1988. It was called Judea by the Romans and Bilad al-Sham by the Byzantine Empire up to the 18th century. The other was that if you were a rich noble man who was captured and could be ransomed, war becomes a sport.
French knights, still cocky and arrogant beyond belief, even after some heavy beating by the English in the Battle of Crécy (1346) and the battle of Poitiers (1356). Only to be further humiliated at Agincourt (1415).
All this battles are indeed true but can you tell exactly what happened before Crecy, what happened between Poitiers and Azincourt and what happened after Azincourt (because the war lasted 116 years, it seems unlikely that only 3 battles happened) ?
@@robert-surcouf Enlighten me, please! I am not familiar with the long succession of events for all those 116 years. In brief, of course, I don't expect an essay :))
@@cosmopolitanbay9508 To summarize, the 100 years war has 5 phases : - the Edward 3's phase or edwardian phase between 1337 and 1360 with his rise until the treaty of brétigny that gave him 25% of france - the Charles 5 and 6's phase or caroline phase between 1360 and 1389 that negated any gains made by Edward 3 and it ended with Richard 2 who owned only 3 cities in France (Bordeaux, Calais and Bayonne) - the peaceful phase between 1389 and 1415 with no real conflicts between the two kingdoms but some internal conflics like the welsh revolt in england and the civil war in france but it ended when Henry 5 started his invasion - the Henry 5 and Bedford's phase or lancastrian phase between 1415 and 1429 by conquering 20% of france and it ended with the siege of Orleans - the Charles 7's phase between 1429 and 1453 that negated any gains made by Henry 5 and Bedford and it ended with Henry 6 who owned only Calais and have lost everything else in France (he will lose everything else in England later) It's impossible to give more details without an essay.
The title is wrong. This battle wasn't a crusade. The factual Crusades are about the Holy Land (Jerusalem). All the history books written about the Crusades cover the military conflicts in the Middle East. This is just a common misconception on the internet that all military campaigns against muslims that try to repel them from the territory are called a crusade.
Disunity among fellow religionists is very much alive today in the face of a fully united religious enemy. The latter only need to be 20% to defeat the disunited 80%.
Please note that there was another Crusade at a later date (The Crusade of Varna) but I am calling this video the last Crusade as this was the last time in history where all of Christendom united
Not to mention India was fighting their own Muslim invaders, and China as well. In some ways China still fighting the invaders on their western borders.
@@getlost3346 hardly fighting. It is called genocide when you round up a whole population, the Uyghurs, using them for body parts, sterilising women, forcing women to have han husbands etc etc. All this according to the UN report that was written, but the third world run UN of course only cares if the West does anything.
We will again😉
@@getlost3346 The uyghurs aren't invaders, the turks lived in xinxiang before the chinese annexed it for the first time centuries ago.
As for india the fight was a two way affair, the first muslim hindu clash was started by hindus when they kidnapped umayyad citizens.
Furthermore the muslims later on were mostly desi in origin making them natives, not invaders.
Even babur's own line was desi very quickly, so the gurkanis (mughals) were not foriegners a few sultans in.
@@resentfuldragon history from all nations sees it as Muslim invasions
The French were executed because Turkish Sultan Bayezid learned about the French massacre of Turkish prisoners from Oryahovo.
Approximately 3000 Turks and other Ottoman subjects were slain by the French, despite surrendering to Sigismund on the terms that they would not be harmed. Sigismund himself was irritated by the dishonourable behaviour of the French.
Once Bayezid got hold of the fate of the Oryahovo residents (likely from Hungarian/Wallachian prisoners), he ordered the French knights to be undressed to dishonour them. He had each knight tied to another knight, and had them march naked in rows of two. Each row was executed swiftly by decapitation once they reached the executioners.
It is indeed said that he got sick of bloodshed and stopped the executions after around two thousand French knights were executed. The rest were marched towards the straits.
The French have a special talent for effing everything up to this day.
Says a br4tit whose country voted for brexit.
BY THE WAY WHO LOST THE 100 YEARS WAR.
Were these Christian’s , Mormons, Jesuits, Catholics, Israelis. Jahova Witnesses, Islamist, or what?
@@patrickporter1864 the poor.
@@patrickporter1864 BY THE WAY WHO WON THE SECOND 100 YEARS WAR
Its silly to focus on one victory, see anybody can do that.
The French although the bravest and the heaviest in the crusader's side, because of their recklessness not only made the entire crusading army suffer but made the France suffer too in the 100 years war because of the same recklessly charge in the battlefield of Agincort and crecei
Correct
Amateurs beaten by professionals.
However they reorganized and won that war.
It was because they murdered those who surrendered after agreeing that their lives would be spared. The sultan killed the french for this.
Just excellent stuff !!!! Love it , thanks !!
Trust the French to pull defeat from the jaws of victory.
Disagreement
The Crusaders didn't have victory anywhere close to their jaws.
Granted, it would have been a much better battle. The forces were about the same.
I can't believe those idiots actually dismounted and just went forward without any scouting.
Very stupid behavior.
the country with the highest number of victories in history! they can afford a defeat occasionally ;)
Mate imagine still thinking that about the french
@@High_rise12 ummm... I do think that about the French, today. If there was ever a European country more deserving of a cursed wretched existence, it would be France and the French would revel in it, they really would. They'd probably be all snobby about it too.
@@josephjohnson5415 the french have one of the most impressive military records of any country on earth and where a military juggernaut for centuries. Try again
Love the history, thank you
One of my favourites so far. Superb as always 😀
Thanks man I'm glad you still watch all my videos :)
Your videos are top quality. I have binged watched so many. A new sub.
Great to hear, thanks for your support
Great video, I am amazed with what you can recreate.
Thanks a lot !
really enjoyed the thorough breakdown of the Nicopolis battle in this vid! however, i find it interesting that some historians downplay the significance of this battle in the greater context of the crusades. what do you all think?
King Sigismund of Hungary is the nemesis of Henry of Skalitz in Kingdom Come Deliverance 😅
Great game
Never knew about this battle. Very interesting and well made video.
FUN FACT: Jean de Carrouges (depicted in the 2021 film THE LAST DUEL) was killed in this battle
I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
cheers bro
Great Video ❤😊
Thanks :) Glad you enjoyed it
Another Awesome video ! These should be required watching in History Class in every school in the USA !
Thanks a lot!
Not to mention in many other nations. India was fighting their own Muslim invaders, and China as well. In some ways China still fighting the invaders on their western borders. Africa fell early to Islam which created slave trade.
Good battle scene also!
gerast! nice animations.. intelligently made documentation
Just found this channel, im excited combining 2 of my favourite things Total War and Actual History ❤
Hope you enjoy them!
Serbian knights are bad ass. They stood with the Turks for a long time fighting their enemies. Much respect
I always thought the Serbs fiercely resisted the Turks. I never knew they actually fought for them.
Serbians are Christians no? Why did they support the Turks?
@@gobanitoheavy cavalry was mostly Christians from the Balkans.
Serbs and Turks were allies for many years @@gobanito
@@gobanito In today's digitized age of the 21st century, people hear one or two facts, and think they have the correct conclusion! So I could say that the English and the French in the 20th century were fierce war enemies...that would be the case, if I took "Operation Catapult" from 1940, when the English sank the French navy, for the entire 20th century. in North Africa! Just as in that short period of the 20th century, the French (a small part of them, "Vichy France") and the English were enemies, so the Serbs and the Ottomans were allies for only 10-20 years. And 100 years before that alliance, and 500 years after that alliance, they were fierce enemies!!!
YET MORE self-evident proof that “Diversity is NOT our Strength.” 🙄
It’s UNITY… A commonality of purpose, identity & shared ideals, that creates strength, cohesion & camaraderie… & bolsters morale.
Turkish army was very diverse too. It was actually Serbian knights who won the battle for them.
The unity of diverse elements is strength
Common purpose, diverse contributions. The most decorated American units in WW2 were nisei (Japanese American) and the black Tuskegee airmen. America is formidable because it is diverse. Russia wants to divide us..
Identity is a divider. Do you think an operating team trying to save a patient considers their identities?
@@joeboyle5864 "Russia" is not the problem inside the U.S.; Cratzi Fascism is the problem. The Crats ( Biden and Harris etc. ) made up a lie about Russian "interference" and "collusion", then pumped 300 billion dollars in new revenue into the Russian economy in 2021 alone, as a payoff for their active, and passive, cooperation in the Collusion Hoax.
Hahaha the young French knights fell for the same" we're retreating" ploy that they gave the Ottomans.
Great film editing and script
Nice video my friend 👌
Thanks for watching bro :)
Slightly off topic but can you get this (units, skins and so on) as a mod on total war?
Yes this is Total War Attila with the 1212 AD kingdoms mod
How come on any resolution I pick this video has massive black borders at top and bottom and sides?
Walachians whas real front line soldiers,who fighted with Ottomans. And when they chossed to retreat,i think they acted good,because battle whas lost from start,and that Wallachian and Hungaryan units,most preserved for next battles. After that battle all Weast units go to there lands(if survived),and forget,but East units,continued fights and battes.
Great video, with very good detail.
Thank you very much!
Have you ever done one on Gettysburg?
I have indeed just check on my channel
Why were French nobles always so arrogant?
These days it’s the yankees
@@latexdrcTheres nothing noble about Yanks.😊
@@latexdrc Really!!! Not the russians, the chinese, or the iranians... Nope... sleepy joe is more arrogant than Putin....You must be a fine observer. Suggestion: pull off your head from your @55, you may improve your point of view a good deal.
*Because that's what FRENCH do best!* Duhh
I don’t think it was just the nobles who were arrogant…
The "Walachians" were în fact Romanians that could have won the fight, should French not have been French, just like they did at Agincourt, Crecy, second WW, etc.
I enjoyed the video.
You'd think armies that fought in the hand to hand era would be well aware of the danger of becoming over extended and exhausted in battle. Lost count of the number of battles I've seen turn around because of this. Probably very hard to stop men charging in when once it starts.
Awesome. May I use upto 5 sec clips of your game visuals without voice in my videos????
So it was the French knights insistence that they would not follow peasant infantry as the vanguard because it would be a dishonor. I play chess and that's not the way to open a chess game or a battle for that matter.
Thank you master
This scene wasn’t in the movie
Hey, so I'm supposed to do this type of cinematic battle but for a documentary and in total war rome 2. What camera mods are you using? I really dont understand how you make it seem so good and how the camera seems so stable.
Im using total war Attila, and the camera mod is Olympian camera mod
@@cinematicbattles559thanks, do you know any camera mods for rome two
French is always french... Great video , graphics 👍🏼👍🏼
Thanks a lot😀
Nice video but Ottomans fighting without any armour against french and crusaders is funny. Of course it is just a total war video but still ....
without armour the turks where much faster than french crusaders and did not get tired so easy on the battlefield ... the vallahian/romanian troops didn't use heavy armour neither; too bad, the pride one is always a looser doesn't matter the nationality !!!
@@mipmixchannel Bro with all my respect this is real time history not a strategy game like total war series, i am sorry but Ottomans had armour, especially the cavalry was heavily armoured, all infantry had at least partially chain mail arm. with breast plates, There is alot that i can write in detail but it will take so long and there is no point in it. Thank you for your comment and addition. Have a nice day.
As far as weapons, the French had the crossbow which did well in close proximity. The English were masters of the long bow which can be fired from a long distance, an immediate advantage
Nothing to do with this video
man I love you videos could you please give a tutorial I liked subbed and turned on notifications
Thanks a lot bro and I just use Total War Attila to make the game play, I also use the Olympian battle camera mod
@@cinematicbattles559 ok thx
All Europeans vs Turkish! The might of the Turks is undisputed.
بل ضد المسلمين العراق سوريا مصر الأناضول كلها
@EbrahimAlkasar i speak no arabic, but i guess you bulls*it about religion...
Why are the knights hospitaller in 13th century armour?
*Excellent*
why didnt you showed janissaries
Where are they now?
is that the name of the movie?
Which is bigger? 1 or 5? The Byz is under one sultan, one army and one purpose.
Haha nice reference
These accounts are excellent.
7:30 nah, the knew they couldn’t stop to attack, it wasn’t a “bypass” AI created, hmmmm I wonder what biases lay here.
Beyazid, was killed by a wounded soldier. Placing 17 old Fatih on the trone who captured Istanbul and that time Constantinople.
Noo bayezid died in captivity by timur. His Son mehmet 1 won the civil war and his son Murad also fought crusaders at Vanna then abdicated the throne to his young son Mehmet 2 fatih
Armies without a single commander almost always lose.
It is very good hystoric background description, as well the situation of Serbian in the ottoman empire and the Albanians
Ма нека се западњаци носе у сто 3,14чке материне !!!
Да су дошли (као што су обећали), 1389 на Газиместан (Косово), са озбиљном војском, око 30 000 ратника, Турци би били до последњег ратника уништени !!! Битка код Никопоља се НИКАДА не би догодила!!!
Срби су се сами супроставили огромној армији Турака, наневши им огромне губитке а и сами пострадаше, остатак Турака је ПОБЕГАО са бојишта, вратио се у Турску, Србија је остала без тадашњег "крема" друштва (изгинуло у битци) а коју са севера напада Мађарска војска са Хуњадијем на челу !!!
Недуго потом Србија постаје ВАЗАЛ Турској, да сачува круну и ситне привилегије, па је у обавези да Турској шаље одређени број ратника када Турска затражи!!! Тако је било и код Никопоља, где је српска тешка коњица разбила "крсташе", који су превасходно имали намере само да пљачкају (посебно Французи), баш као и у свим крсташким походима !!!
Може да кења шта год ко хоће, чињенице су такве, а ИЗДАЈНИЧКАЗападна Алијанса се вековима труди да оправда недолазак на Косово, што је још једна огромна срамота, недостатак части, достојанства и морала!!!
What its the name of the game total war!? Attila mod !?
This is total war Attila with the 1212AD kingdoms mod
I just recently learned: the guy from the movie last duel (played by Matt Damon) died in this battle
there only 2 french commanders/leaders who have actually one battles. Charlemagne and Napoleon. ironically both arent natural born french, one is a germanic frank and the other a corsican.
Charles the Hammer Martel beat the Moors. Besides, France has won more wars than any other country, if I recall.
@@kola-x9p Charles Martell and Pipen the short also were successful in battle, both French royalty.
Critical of the vanities although the French Knight is undoubtedly brave
all those victories and glories of muslim conquests lost in a dust as muslim kings fight eachother for land , gold and women. from Battle of Ankara 1402 , to the battle of Battle of Panipat 1526 and later on , muslim rulers fight eachother for power , destory and corrupt the enitre muslim world.
what total war is this? Med?
mod for Attila: Medieval Kingdoms 1212
1212 Medieval Kingdoms mod for Total War Attila
Tuchman tells the story of Coucy in "A Distant Mirror". Doesn't end well for him
Which total war is this?
This is Total War Attila with the 1212Ad Kingdoms mod
wow how do you make these battles?
Buy pc game total war atilla medieval age 😉
This is Total War Attila and im using the 1212Ad Kingdoms mod
The places where these battles took place got to be super haunted surely 😂 our history is so crazy but I love it
Holy, french arrogance costed thousands of lives and the whole campaing. It's a prime example why in the military hierarchy and discipline are paramount.
Which Total War game is this? is this Medieval 2? With mods?
This is Total War Attila with the 1212Ad Kingdoms mod
@@cinematicbattles559 I'll have to check that mod out. Love the TW series. Still sad Empire became unplayable
what game/ mod is this?
This is Total War Attila using the 1212Ad Kingdoms mod
They could have won.
They made too many mistakes.
Anyway, Bayezid got what deserved in Ankara.
Tamerlane totally destroyed himz showing who's the boss.
😂imagine only bayezid showed destroy all crusaders if him and other muslim had united they would’ve conquered whole world😀bayezid is the boss of christiendom
@izharulhaqtruthrevealed1185 boss? He got destroyed by Tamerlane.
Mehmed tried to conquer the West, but couldnt even conquer Belgrade and Rodi...
The ottomans always had numerical superiority but couldnt even conquer Austria. They tried two times... They failed.
@ 🤣yes but yet bayezid empire outlived Tamerlane.
Imagine all Christians coalition defeated by just one Muslim empire. 😄😂if not timur bayezid would’ve crush remaining western 🤣west celebrates deafeat of bayezid at Ankara😩imagine even to this day Christians celebrate it like you😄
Had Muslim empires united all western countries would’ve been conquered
@@izharulhaqtruthrevealed1185 Thankfully, that never happened and Europe had a reformation and Western civilization dominates the world. Imagine if we were like, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia
Love the video but why the Mongol music?
Because of Turkic Steppe nomadic heritage bloodlines 🐴🐎🏇💨💨💨🎪🎪🌄🌄🏹🏹
@@ophirbactrius8285 Oh, interesting. Thanks.
Look up Turkic throat singing. It’s awesome
@@Raghead-k9r Interesting, thanks.
Coucy was prob the best French commander of the era.
Yes he was. I read a book about him with the the title Le bon Sire de Coucy. He died at Nicopolis as far as I remember, but not in the battle. The french nobles waited for ransom.
Where were the French at the battle of drumossie muir in 1746 (culloden) never showed up.
There were two french regiments who fought rearguard which allowed my st if highland army to get away.
They were in France where they belonged. Told prince Charlie many times not to go to Scotland. Sensible. Line telling USA not to go to Iraq.
Means you get called names.
However means you don't spend three trillion dollars and leave a messed up situation.
How do Turks win without armours?
With agility
This is legit how every other crusade in ck3 plays out no tactics or cooperation always losing them wars 😂😅
Very close to when the French figured out the cannon
Video does not explain how 500 Frenchmen caysed 20000 crusaders to pise ti the sane amount if turks.
Ottoman inspire still coming into Chris land. The control of any land still going on
I'm not sure if I believe any of this old history I've been taught. Looks cool though.
But the huge Ottoman Empire never conquered tiny Malta in 1565 . Known as " The Great Seige of Malta".
😂it’s easier to defend an Island behind water and fortress 😂if it were open battle ottomans would crush any crusaders that time
@izharulhaqtruthrevealed1185 So why did they try in the first place ? 😂😂😂😂. Oh, and so did the Germans during the second World War. Malta is small, but 💪💪💪💪💪😂😂🤣😂
Isn't history marvellous? Two things in note was that Palestine didn't become a country until 1988. It was called Judea by the Romans and Bilad al-Sham by the Byzantine Empire up to the 18th century. The other was that if you were a rich noble man who was captured and could be ransomed, war becomes a sport.
Looks like the King of Hungary is wearing the Stars and Stripes.
This why I love history under the sun people died for what they believed in at that time
They could have used the knights Templar but ... oops nevermind. ?
2:30 looks like Polish eagle emblem.
French are very good at loosing wars. Very proud but this does help much.
The prideful French, nothing ever changes.
رحم الله شهدائنا لا غالب الا الله
French knights, still cocky and arrogant beyond belief, even after some heavy beating by the English in the Battle of Crécy (1346) and the battle of Poitiers (1356). Only to be further humiliated at Agincourt (1415).
And finally won the 100 years war 😉
All this battles are indeed true but can you tell exactly what happened before Crecy, what happened between Poitiers and Azincourt and what happened after Azincourt (because the war lasted 116 years, it seems unlikely that only 3 battles happened) ?
@@robert-surcouf Enlighten me, please! I am not familiar with the long succession of events for all those 116 years. In brief, of course, I don't expect an essay :))
@@cosmopolitanbay9508 To summarize, the 100 years war has 5 phases :
- the Edward 3's phase or edwardian phase between 1337 and 1360 with his rise until the treaty of brétigny that gave him 25% of france
- the Charles 5 and 6's phase or caroline phase between 1360 and 1389 that negated any gains made by Edward 3 and it ended with Richard 2 who owned only 3 cities in France (Bordeaux, Calais and Bayonne)
- the peaceful phase between 1389 and 1415 with no real conflicts between the two kingdoms but some internal conflics like the welsh revolt in england and the civil war in france but it ended when Henry 5 started his invasion
- the Henry 5 and Bedford's phase or lancastrian phase between 1415 and 1429 by conquering 20% of france and it ended with the siege of Orleans
- the Charles 7's phase between 1429 and 1453 that negated any gains made by Henry 5 and Bedford and it ended with Henry 6 who owned only Calais and have lost everything else in France (he will lose everything else in England later)
It's impossible to give more details without an essay.
They should have read "The Art of War" and most important, understood it. Arrogance in battle with no information is death. Information is all.
If you know your self but not the enemy, for every victory you will….WHAT?
The title is wrong. This battle wasn't a crusade. The factual Crusades are about the Holy Land (Jerusalem). All the history books written about the Crusades cover the military conflicts in the Middle East. This is just a common misconception on the internet that all military campaigns against muslims that try to repel them from the territory are called a crusade.
Good story...
Now they just enter Europe on planes
The crusaders were always getting there buts kicked
Disunity among fellow religionists is very much alive today in the face of a fully united religious enemy. The latter only need to be 20% to defeat the disunited 80%.
How many French dead throughout history because of ignarrogance?
What total war is this that they be going ham in single combat dropping weapons and punching and finishing victims haha
England France, a 100 year war. How many millions of children where consumed Eaton adrenal Chrome?
Oh I wonder why the serbs did not turn on the Turks and fought with the French , were they afraid of the consequent,
لأنهم مسلمين لن تفهم ما اقصد حتى تفهم الإسلام
Oh nvm ignore my last comment cause my delete and edit button isn’t working
Homie at 12:22 gets destroyed by that horse lol.
So, basically the French lost most of Christendom.