I would love for this watch to be super accurate, but we all know that if it was then Apple, Samsung and other leading manufacturers would have also implemented these features, have they...NO.
Totally agree, but a reminder, for US these devices need to run through the FDA for federal approval. They could be 100% accurate but still not approved without months/years of double blind testing and millions of $$$. Just now AFib detection is appearing with an FDA wink on things like Apple and FitBit. So if these devices are, indeed, using algorithms based on scientific study, and feedback loop testing is constantly being done to refine the readings, then eventually we may see this technology migrate to the major smartwatch players. For now, these are fun toys to play with and compare with your known and proven measurements. At least I'm more interested in calling up my latest blood composition tests from my last Doctor's check-up and see how they compare. That's perked my interest in my health, which in and of itself is a good thing. Perhaps I'll switch to regular fries rather than super-sized next McDonalds run.
Haha, AWESOME! Captain Kangaroo and Mr. Green Jeans were my YT equivalent. Mr. Rogers was just tooooo sweet as I always had a 'Little Rascal' side to me. Boomers, wink wink.
Yea, too bad, but when it gets better, we've got some nice ways of presenting the data on a smartwatch and phone app. They're working out that part really nicely. Should be easy to swap out the algorithms as technology improves in this biometric health arena. Google and Apple and Samsung are spending millions in research along these lines as well, so, 'it's only a matter of time'.
The video is very nice, but it's impossible for that watch to be accurate, for two reasons, it's very slim and low coast, but they know how to sell the dreams. We must boycott such products because they are made only with lies and can easily play with the health of some buyers that believe in ads, warning, it's serious.
I don't even want to go there as I'm a firm believer it's up to each and every one of us INDIVIDUALLY to do that, given we all have different bodies, skin color, body hair, etc.I've tried it in the past, so feel free to watch some of the earlier ECG+PPG smartwatch reviews to learn how it's done and some of the science behind it. For now, I can neither confirm nor deny these reading are accurate for me, let alone translatable to accuracy for anyone else. We all appreciate feedback from actual explorers like yourself who do take the time to compare watch readings with personal medical gadget readings, so please let us know your specific accuracy results if you get one. Thanks!
I would love for this watch to be super accurate, but we all know that if it was then Apple, Samsung and other leading manufacturers would have also implemented these features, have they...NO.
Totally agree, but a reminder, for US these devices need to run through the FDA for federal approval. They could be 100% accurate but still not approved without months/years of double blind testing and millions of $$$. Just now AFib detection is appearing with an FDA wink on things like Apple and FitBit.
So if these devices are, indeed, using algorithms based on scientific study, and feedback loop testing is constantly being done to refine the readings, then eventually we may see this technology migrate to the major smartwatch players. For now, these are fun toys to play with and compare with your known and proven measurements. At least I'm more interested in calling up my latest blood composition tests from my last Doctor's check-up and see how they compare. That's perked my interest in my health, which in and of itself is a good thing. Perhaps I'll switch to regular fries rather than super-sized next McDonalds run.
This is my childhood RUclipsr
Haha, AWESOME! Captain Kangaroo and Mr. Green Jeans were my YT equivalent. Mr. Rogers was just tooooo sweet as I always had a 'Little Rascal' side to me. Boomers, wink wink.
ET585 coming ...
Pls do a review of kosoet Iheal5 pls......especially it's amoled thing
Very nice hardware...
Too bad the health related stuff is FAAAAKE. 😆
Yea, too bad, but when it gets better, we've got some nice ways of presenting the data on a smartwatch and phone app. They're working out that part really nicely. Should be easy to swap out the algorithms as technology improves in this biometric health arena. Google and Apple and Samsung are spending millions in research along these lines as well, so, 'it's only a matter of time'.
The video is very nice, but it's impossible for that watch to be accurate, for two reasons, it's very slim and low coast, but they know how to sell the dreams. We must boycott such products because they are made only with lies and can easily play with the health of some buyers that believe in ads, warning, it's serious.
Why don’t you compare with original medical gadgets .
I don't even want to go there as I'm a firm believer it's up to each and every one of us INDIVIDUALLY to do that, given we all have different bodies, skin color, body hair, etc.I've tried it in the past, so feel free to watch some of the earlier ECG+PPG smartwatch reviews to learn how it's done and some of the science behind it. For now, I can neither confirm nor deny these reading are accurate for me, let alone translatable to accuracy for anyone else. We all appreciate feedback from actual explorers like yourself who do take the time to compare watch readings with personal medical gadget readings, so please let us know your specific accuracy results if you get one. Thanks!
💃 Promo-SM