Actually he did everything to end up in this video because initially he played this titled tuesday to get paired against somebody from top list in 1st round so that we could record a video. He sacrificed himself) ruclips.net/video/DtqQoR57-R0/видео.html
@@peterlungu385 If you tell a super GM there's a puzzle, they would exhaust all options and start looking for absurd tactics like this. Not sure if it's findable, but it would be worth it to test someone like Hikaru
Literally, in one of my game i moved a queen and i took his knight and a pawn, but stockfish marked it as an imprecision and telled me i missed mate in 6 moves
@@Az1Tr0M1z1N4 Hi, just a quick grammatical note in case you are interested in improving your English, "to tell" is an irregular verb meaning it's past tense doesn't form by appending -ed to the verb. Instead the past tense is "told" so in your sentence it would've been "and told me I missed" Hope it helps :)
@@xelspeth K thanks i learned english from native speakers and i tought that ed applied to tell, i didnt ask any native speakers to teach me, i teached my self from what they said in a normal convo
@@Az1Tr0M1z1N4there's another mistake of the same type in your second comment. You used the word, 'teached', which is incorrect. The past tense of teach is tought, not teached. So your sentence should be,"I tought my self." Should help.
Move type: "Erudite" Color: Purple Requirements: - Best move in the position - All other possible moves have a much worse evaluation - Engine analysis believes it to be terrible on low to medium depth
I only analyze my games when I win lol I know it’s counter productive but I’ve lost some games I know I had an incredible advantage and made some great moves I just messed it up in the end and I know exactly where it all went wrong so I don’t bother going back
@@strangelyrepulsive77 oh yes, I saw one puzzle with this. But I think they are significantly more rare than interference sacrifices. But yes, they're also extremely hard to see, once you see it makes sense but to find it is crazy.
@@ejmazzi1499 I'm not accusing anyone of cheating I'm pointing out that the computer found this insane game winning move that's so abstract and hard to spot and as far as the computer was concerned it was a perfectly normal move. It's a move that 99% of humans would've never found because it initially seems so random that we wouldn't even consider it but since a computer is able to consider and play through every possible move on every turn it's able to find moves like this with no issue which is why it's so hard to beat.
Levy, I just want to say that I really appreciate these deeper dive videos into a single game. I think it's a lot better for learning to go through one game a bit more slowly and carefully than to go through a few games more quickly. So, do more videos like this one please :)
The more people study computer moves like this the more likely it becomes they find moves like this. A lot of the moves that were humanly impossible 10 years ago are getting played by loads of young GMs today. This particular one might be an exception, but the idea to sacrifice lost material to offer a choice "capture now and close your file or I resurrect into safety" will be thought of going forward (if it isn't already).
8:02 Your explanations so far were so good I was one of the people not wondering when the brilliant move would come, I was being entertained on the journey to it.
@@HereWeGo0o0 Same hahaha. I was so motivated to play some chess during the first half of the video but then I said that watching the sealing suits my intellect better.
Title: New chess move invented Opening: one of the moves I played in this game could be considered "more than brilliant" Actual content: the top engine move in the reached position that I *could have played* was really clever
new move: Throw a blunder so atrocious and hideous that not only erases any chance of you winning the game but also makes you reconsider if you should be playing chess in the first place
Levy said the brilliant move happened in the game, but the fact is that neither player actually played the genius move. It was a computer move in analysis.
It's not every day you encounter such a mind-boggling chess move. Chess can surprise even the most seasoned players. Truly, a game of patience and wit.
11:09 no way a 2700 player thinks en passant is forced. That is clearly a comment aimed at beginners, trying to be relatable and teaching something new to them
I have had several brilliant moves but I did not think they were brilliant, I had planned for them a couple of moves earlier but did not know if they would materialise.
@@i_n_c_r_y_p_t_o that is correct if we talk about RGB. That means magenta is also half blue and yellow is half green. But to call cyan a “shade of blue” is wrong.
A computer isn't good at designating poor/good/brilliant moves, it often gives the brilliant double exclamation to moves that are pretty obvious and a question mark to a move that in practicality versus a human is a really good move, the computer can't really tell what is hard or easy to see for a human, it's all just data to a computer.
1: i think they give inactive players a couple more brilliants sometimes to keep them more active 2: some positions are sharper where its easier to blunder but i dont have a problem with that, just my opinion
Seriously, what did he mean when he said that he only just learned after this game that your opponent has the option to decline capturing via "en passant"? There's no way an IM could think that and so he must have misspoke or I am an idiot and missed something... I'm very confused....
What a beautiful way to understand circumstance. After I see the computer's move, and you explain it, it all makes so much sense. The computer wants to win more than any human wants to win.
I genuinely almost clicked out so many times! DID NOT SEE THAT COMING... did not disappoint in the end. Explanation is 100% needed. with it its so obvious!
I'm so glad you started playing Levy, I've been hoping you would get back into chess like this for years. So excited to see how you continue to progress, and entertain us along the way.
I believe there might be a misunderstanding. You can break the repetition by moving the white queen to a7 for a second check, and then relocating it to e3 for the same move. As a result, there is no checkmate.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Poor guy, played the opening absolutely safe to make sure he wouldnt end up in a gotham video, just for him to end up in a gotham video
real
😂😂
the content is inevitable
Actually he did everything to end up in this video because initially he played this titled tuesday to get paired against somebody from top list in 1st round so that we could record a video. He sacrificed himself) ruclips.net/video/DtqQoR57-R0/видео.html
To be fair the video isn't really about the fact Gotham won but rather about our Robot overlords being so unfathomably good
You need to turn that into a puzzle and test super GMs with it
That would be cool.
Unfindable tbh, unless they watched this recap
@@peterlungu385 If you tell a super GM there's a puzzle, they would exhaust all options and start looking for absurd tactics like this. Not sure if it's findable, but it would be worth it to test someone like Hikaru
@@peterlungu385Just cause you couldnt have found it, doesnt meant its not findablw
A top gm would def find this if they are told it’s a puzzle, even normal gms would
I can guarantee that there is not a new chess move
Google il vaticano
@@Hgffyhv my farts are better than Gotham farts
I agree
Bro just saved us 23minutes 25 seconds of our lives. Thank you, now I can spend time on finishing this video
Respect(Start chain)
Me: Plays a natural move.
Stockfish: You missed a mate in 7 👹.
Literally, in one of my game i moved a queen and i took his knight and a pawn, but stockfish marked it as an imprecision and telled me i missed mate in 6 moves
@@Az1Tr0M1z1N4 Hi, just a quick grammatical note in case you are interested in improving your English, "to tell" is an irregular verb meaning it's past tense doesn't form by appending -ed to the verb. Instead the past tense is "told" so in your sentence it would've been "and told me I missed"
Hope it helps :)
@@xelspeth K thanks i learned english from native speakers and i tought that ed applied to tell, i didnt ask any native speakers to teach me, i teached my self from what they said in a normal convo
@@Az1Tr0M1z1N4there's another mistake of the same type in your second comment. You used the word, 'teached', which is incorrect. The past tense of teach is tought, not teached. So your sentence should be,"I tought my self." Should help.
@@OmChakraborty69420 tought is just past of think idk if past tense or something like that, it should be taught i think not tought
"and if i give up my rook, which is second nature to me" LOL
i heard that too lol
Move type: "Erudite"
Color: Purple
Requirements:
- Best move in the position
- All other possible moves have a much worse evaluation
- Engine analysis believes it to be terrible on low to medium depth
thats literally just the old brilliant move requirements lol
what wud be the symbol?
!!!
@@boop7441it was a much better classification than what it currently is imho
@@silverseacow nah, o:
What about elite move
Imagine if levy never analyzed this game, he would’ve never realized he had the most legendary tactical sequence ever on his hands
Something I think about all the time is how many awesome moves like this never get discovered bc people don’t analyze their games (me)
@@zackdesilva4730Diamand sub is too expensive tbh
I only analyze my games when I win lol I know it’s counter productive but I’ve lost some games I know I had an incredible advantage and made some great moves I just messed it up in the end and I know exactly where it all went wrong so I don’t bother going back
He's an IM pushing for GM, he probably reviews every game he plays
If you can invent a move, I can too. Mine is called the EXTREME BLUNDER.
Oh, I always thought that it's my move, ok, I can have "Extreme Blunder 2" ;)
Extreme blunder =when someone gets checkmated while they’re up 18 points of material
Blunder extraordinaire
@@NoBatteriesLOLMay I present; the Fumble. When you go from mate in one to getting mated
"Extreme Blunder" It has a name and It's called "The Botez Gambit".
22:01 - "IT IS SO DEEP! There are so many points."
"strike me down and i shall become more annoying than you can imagine"
-the bishop, probably
It’s always the interference sacrifices that are impossible to see
or mitrofanov deflections
@@strangelyrepulsive77 oh yes, I saw one puzzle with this. But I think they are significantly more rare than interference sacrifices. But yes, they're also extremely hard to see, once you see it makes sense but to find it is crazy.
Perfect example of why beating a computer at chess is essentially impossible
Whom are you accusing of cheating?
@@ejmazzi1499 I'm not accusing anyone of cheating I'm pointing out that the computer found this insane game winning move that's so abstract and hard to spot and as far as the computer was concerned it was a perfectly normal move. It's a move that 99% of humans would've never found because it initially seems so random that we wouldn't even consider it but since a computer is able to consider and play through every possible move on every turn it's able to find moves like this with no issue which is why it's so hard to beat.
@@degiguess only 99% is crazy
that move was the last thing i expected
That move wasn't brilliant, it was TRILLIANT!
It's QUILLIANT
@@Oli-fo4ct ITS OMNILLIANT!
16:47 there you go guys
Thanks! the video from here on would have been enough on it's own
Levy not using Magnus to milk views is like seeing a cat drive a car
@@snbjornPizza my farts better than Gotham farts
wdym bro. cats are good drivers
Seeing a sentence in Gotham’s comments that doesn’t include the word Magnus and milk is like seeing Magnus milk a cow
I saw that once
cars do be driving cars 😾😾
"Not Vladimir Kramnik. Had I won, we'd have had some issues."
Had me in stitches😂😂
I was looking for this comment 😂
I don't get the joke. Could you please explain?
@@5HeadTristanthe joke is about Kramnik claiming everyone who bettered him "cheater"
@@volodymyrmoskalenko "It's clear now, let's do the procedure" ahh accusations 😋
@@volodymyrmoskalenko Interesting...
Levy, I just want to say that I really appreciate these deeper dive videos into a single game. I think it's a lot better for learning to go through one game a bit more slowly and carefully than to go through a few games more quickly. So, do more videos like this one please :)
"To give up my rook (which is second nature to me)" XD
*THE ROOOOOOOOK*
I am officially too stupid for chess.
Welcome to humanity
That move is actually crazy. Idk if it is even humanly possible to think about this move
We spent half the video thinking about it retard
I reckon it is findable in classical chess but probably not blitz
Right? Many people thought engines were gonna kill the "romance" in chess, but I think moves like these are truly jawdropping!
The more people study computer moves like this the more likely it becomes they find moves like this. A lot of the moves that were humanly impossible 10 years ago are getting played by loads of young GMs today.
This particular one might be an exception, but the idea to sacrifice lost material to offer a choice "capture now and close your file or I resurrect into safety" will be thought of going forward (if it isn't already).
levy glazing himself instead of magnus carlsen is a new move
A move so brilliant it has 8 exclamation marks
@@SofiaTrainerwhat were lies 😮
@@SofiaTrainerwhat the actual fuсk
@@SofiaTrainerAAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHHAHAHA
@@JUSTREGULARSCREAMINGAAHH ikr
I don’t know I was bored
8:02 Your explanations so far were so good I was one of the people not wondering when the brilliant move would come, I was being entertained on the journey to it.
I guarantee you that even chess geniuses would have spend a LOT of time to find this on a classic game.
It's one of the best tactics I've seen
Levy: "It's an easy move once you explain it"
My 1000 elo brain: "Right"
My 650 elo Brain: “What was the question?”
@@HereWeGo0o0 Same hahaha. I was so motivated to play some chess during the first half of the video but then I said that watching the sealing suits my intellect better.
My 100 elo brain: w-what?
This video convinced me to stop playing chess and go back to "playing" adult visual novels.
Levy making fun of kramnik is so funny
He's not making fun of Kramnik. Kramnik makes fun of him
@@Remir_ sorry but levy clearly made fun of kram here
@@sorakirisaki5330 im kidding
@@OpposingFork making fun of kramnik is the only logical stance you could take at this point😭😭 dude is just making a fool of himself
Original title
“NEW CHESS MOVE INVENTED!!!!!!!!”
“just in case!” ahh
My farts are better than Gotham farts
Original title: “NEW CHESS MOVE INVENTED!!!!!!!”
@@chess1415prove it
@@chess1415gross
I lost you at “ladies and gentlemen” 😂😂😂
"There are very few guaranteed pleasures in life, but one of those pleasures is receiving" - Levy 2024
12:34 when stuckfish thinks twice you know that something crazy is about to happen
Sorry to tell you levy, but Hikaru already thought of the whole chess game while he was sleeping.
Then he stood up, premoved everything and left to get a coffee
As an player near 3000 elo( I am just 2200 elo away ) I can say that is is kinda good 🙃🙃
Same buddy as a 3000 elo player I'm just 2350 elo short
5000 elo here ( only 3500 away)
2200 elo (Away) is extremely good!
Yeah I am 5000
(4816 away)
No but this move is actually fascinating, this is the first time in a while actually that I got this excited in a Gotham video
bishop to c6 would've never made sense to me, but you're superb at explaining. Wow, like wow
My new move is called "DISAPPOINTMENT TO PARENTS"
Title: New chess move invented
Opening: one of the moves I played in this game could be considered "more than brilliant"
Actual content: the top engine move in the reached position that I *could have played* was really clever
actual content for non-chess playing people: over excited guy amazed at his own prowess :)
he didn't said he played, he said there was a move in the game
Ma cat died yesterday and I must say your Video is the first thing that made me laugh again. ❤
Sorry I lost many cats and yeah I know how it feels
I am very sorry for your loss.
new move: Throw
a blunder so atrocious and hideous that not only erases any chance of you winning the game but also makes you reconsider if you should be playing chess in the first place
4:48 we need more ufc references
Gotham speaks like hes leading us to a treasure playing the role of a wizard
if you make an inaccuracy youll have to break the rules to make up for that inaccuracy
This reminds me of the Diemer VS Trommsdorf game with 32. b3, just a move with so much depth and genius that it solidifies itself in history. Insane
“Pawn to E4”
“This move is so incredible because it eventually leads to checkmate in 50 moves
Levy said the brilliant move happened in the game, but the fact is that neither player actually played the genius move. It was a computer move in analysis.
a purple move for extreme brilliancy would be sick
I want a move that flashes in bright lights and is singing a song.
A green vomiting Knight for a sick move.
The new levy going to be soon a grand mother
😂😂
When everything else fails me, I can always count on Levy staring into my soul for the first second of the video.
LOL "I only learned after the game en passant wasn't forced" Levy can be such a troll sometimes. I love it.
1:33 TiMe To DO ThE pROcEduRe
the most mind-blown i've ever been by a chess move
Keep it clean, TenTu.
magnus would figure it out after glancing at the board for 0.01 seconds
Bro showed a move he never played
I want da “LEGENDARY MOVE”
Usually these are clickbait, but that genuinely is a brilliant move.
"Chess when played perfectly ends in a draw"
_someone i dont know a name of
11:08 no no levy, en passant is forced, just not by the rules
It’s not forced
@@Mongol456 it's forced bro trust
Where is Magnesium Calcium?
1220
@@timaeustanis359 *THROWS STACK OF PAPER ACROSS THE ROOM* THE NUMBERS MASON!!! WHAT DO THEY MEAN???
@@r011ing_thunder6 HAHAHAHHAHA got the reference
On the periodic table.
Do you mean magnum carlos?
we got gotham chess sacrifising the bishop before gta 6
It's not every day you encounter such a mind-boggling chess move. Chess can surprise even the most seasoned players. Truly, a game of patience and wit.
This play should be called "Legendary Move" with glowing golden*
Glowing golden
@@JUSTREGULARSCREAMINGAAHH I agree Golden sounds much better
11:02 bro how am i ever supposed to believe you again... trolling without even pulling a face
For real lol, I didn't know how to take that comment
Yes I just watched that part again and now I'm like oh yeah, trolling lol.
Bro doesn't even try to not make a clickbait title
It's not that he doesn't try not make a clickbait title, but that he does try to make a clickbait title. It's not like it's an accident.
Getting a brilliant move is greater than the birth of your first born
that move is hyper-brilliant, it's a sacrifice that doesn't earn back a piece, but instead gains a 5-head boardcontrol
20:34 “Queen B8 check is a draw” stockfish: nah, black is +5
Yeah, misspeak. He meant that it's a draw if Black loses the bishop, but not if they save it with Be8.
11:09 no way a 2700 player thinks en passant is forced. That is clearly a comment aimed at beginners, trying to be relatable and teaching something new to them
It's a meme...
bro???? 💀💀💀
I’ve never gotten an intentional brilliant move.
Same brother 😂
bro just study and learn the greek gift it counts every time lol
The first (and second) time ive ever had a brilliant move was when i had 700 elo and it was 2 brilliant moves in a row
I have had several brilliant moves but I did not think they were brilliant, I had planned for them a couple of moves earlier but did not know if they would materialise.
@@ianstopher9111 Same
If there was a chess sports anime, this video would be the protagonists internal monologue
the "be patient" at around 8 minutes LOL u killll meeee im in it for the whole 24mins babyyyy
Levy never fails to milk the exclamation mark
0:22 it’s a cyan circle. not blue.
Please get a life
To be fair, cyan is half blue. :) rgb: 0, 255, 255
@@i_n_c_r_y_p_t_o that is correct if we talk about RGB. That means magenta is also half blue and yellow is half green. But to call cyan a “shade of blue” is wrong.
Cyan is a shade of blue
@@whygames9171 if cyan is a shade of blue then yellow is a shade of red.
Can’t wait to see Levy as general manager
Can’t wait to see him as a Gay minor
My farts are better than Gotham farts
@@user-kblj91652wtf
can't wait to see levy rename himself to gevy mozmann
Can’t want to see levy as GrandMother
Can't wait to lose by taking huge risks to prevent a defense my opponent will never see.
My first brilliant move was when I was playing a 2 minute bullet game while taking a crap at work.
A computer isn't good at designating poor/good/brilliant moves, it often gives the brilliant double exclamation to moves that are pretty obvious and a question mark to a move that in practicality versus a human is a really good move, the computer can't really tell what is hard or easy to see for a human, it's all just data to a computer.
Bro is yappin
my one problem with comp evaluation is the fact that giving up a piece is considered a blunder while blundering checkmate is a mistake
1: i think they give inactive players a couple more brilliants sometimes to keep them more active
2: some positions are sharper where its easier to blunder but i dont have a problem with that, just my opinion
@@nov3m472 I play every day and get a brilliant once every three days or smthing
Levy always manages to make me beleive shit that ain't real
oil up boy
Αy yo
Bro thought this entire over 20 min in his head under 6 mins during the bullet game.......😮
The power of a chess master!
the storytelling in this video is amazing, congrats Levy, this was VERY entertraining
Mythical aah move
No new move invented since 900 years, bro fell off
Very "original" inspired ahh comment💀💀💀
Also you are right
google en passant
Well , "en passant " stopped him from being GM ,
Now he is all set
Seriously, what did he mean when he said that he only just learned after this game that your opponent has the option to decline capturing via "en passant"? There's no way an IM could think that and so he must have misspoke or I am an idiot and missed something... I'm very confused....
@@4504595 That definitely caught me off guard too, cause his book explicitly says that en passant isn't obligatory. So weird
@@4504595 It's just the lowest key troll. His own book explicitly says en passant isn't obligatory
@@4504595 It's just the lowest key troll. His own book says that en passant isn't obligatory
@@4504595 It's a joke in the chess community that en passents are forced
There was indeed a new chessmove. Levy's opponent was truly genius. he sacrificed his pride by not accepting en passant. truly A 4D chessmove
New chess move just dropped
Congratulations, you found a chess move that transcends humanity.
black's move in the match between fro trommsdorf and emil joseph diemer deserves 5 exlamation marks.
Plzzz give that legendary move to Frank Marshall's Queen sacrifice💪💪❤️
What a beautiful way to understand circumstance. After I see the computer's move, and you explain it, it all makes so much sense. The computer wants to win more than any human wants to win.
*literally slips the mouse*
"Ok wait, let's continue to play with nonchalance, pretending i am a genius."
I once accidentally played brilliantly in the middle game, with 89% accuracy.
The game review give me the brilliant sign for the middle games
"had I won we would've had some issues" is an amazing quick dig. Idk if that was scripted or improvised but it was beautiful
I genuinely almost clicked out so many times! DID NOT SEE THAT COMING... did not disappoint in the end. Explanation is 100% needed. with it its so obvious!
It is wild how computers have changed and continue to change chess. What an amazing move.
if they add a new move it should be called "Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious"
They could call it a legendary move and reserve it for moves that are both amazing and borderline unfindable by a human
I'm so glad you started playing Levy, I've been hoping you would get back into chess like this for years. So excited to see how you continue to progress, and entertain us along the way.
Give me a billion years I would not find that sacrifice.
Levy doesn't miss a UFC PPV thats for sure
I believe there might be a misunderstanding. You can break the repetition by moving the white queen to a7 for a second check, and then relocating it to e3 for the same move. As a result, there is no checkmate.