Hello, Thank you very much, This was very informative. I have been wanting to buy this as my monitor replacement for a long time now I have one feed back if possible to convey. just like rabbit , AI pin , which can ultimately be an application on android phone can Rokid partner up with samsung , google , oneplus etc etc, to make a chunky android phone (big battery phone ) with 2 usb c port, and two camera same specs on an android phone, so that Rokid can focus only on glasses not the phone aspect My android phone is already has lots of compute power ,, which i use only to text on whatsapp and watch youtube i just want a perfect AR glasses , the phone part is already solved phone + glasses + good earphone + game controller + Bluetooth keyboard, its a complete package of portable workstation + home theater + game setup i say this because + i want to be able to connect Rokid into my laptop to continue working if its an android and windows app it can be seamless please consider my request thank you
An honest comparison video between the Rokid AR Lite and the Xreal Air 2 pro ( with XREAL Beam Pro ) would be great !! Which one is better ? Thank you !
11:18 I know what you did there. I just got mine (beam pro) delivered last week and boy I wish they went the route without phone screen compared to the touch pad but whatever. The Rokid Station 2 is still an android device. Laughing at you taking subliminal shots at Xreal’s beam pro.. Bro you on some sneaky shyyt 😂
Love your vids. You keep it moving with new things most people don’t bother to even review anymore (US centrists 🙄) So thanks for this one and others. I much enjoy them 😊🎉 Also, lmao “…right Rokit???” 😂😂😂
I do hv this rokid products last time. Pls address whether these problems are still prevalent: 1. Heat on the glasses are burning ur forehead 2. Fov is extremely narrow 3. A lot of lagging experience causing motion sickness 4. Bcuz the fov is so narrow and the resolution is so low, I doubt that it's true 200 inch movie watching. I believe it's just 30 inches the most
Problem of these AR glasses is one big issue: the need of external device to do simple things.... Minimum requirement for true next gen AR glasses in my opinion is the following: 1. Qualcomm AR2 chip with built in 6DOF support (so it works on all devices) 2. Built in battery placed at the back portion of the ear (to improve balance) 3. Have minimum of 60FOV (otherwise 3DOF or 6DOF are pointless) 4. Have brightness of at least 1500 or have dynamic dimming zones glass (to make it usable in bright areas) In my opinion all of this is not far depending on what I saw in XR event, we will see prototype this year and maybe release in 1-2 years time
@@fredrickbambino Meta will showcase one prototype this year I was told in their upcoming event, that prototype is the true next gen AR glasses and from there Meta + Apple + Xiaomi + some other will start AR glasses era
@@Eskoxo it would be nice to have a quest 3 that isnt a big bulky headset strapped to your face but glasses instead, but unless we make a breakthroughs in battery capacity, that ain't happening anytime soon.
@@Eskoxo That's not VR headset lol, VR headsets have FOV of 100+ not 60 I'm asking for, also you won't need dimming zones in VR like you do in AR as well as 1500 nits not achievable in VR right now but achievable in AR. Just wait for Meta event and you will see what I'm talking about
I like that all manufacturers of VR helmets and AR glasses are starting to come to the same menu inside the device, so it will be convenient when changing headsets, you always intuitively understand what is where,and you don’t have to get used to and study the layout of the interface menu elements in each new device.
@@Eskoxo I'm not saying Rokid is worth buying, I'm saying a real sunglasses VR solution is coming soon based on the rate of progress. Bigscreen doesn't have passthrough / AR, so it's not worth buying IMO. I have a Quest 3 and use it regularly with virtual monitors in order to have a 3D viewport into Blender. My only complaint is the bulk. I want a sunglasses form-factor.
yes it is the most important feature for me. I have a small 1080 p monitor and I don't want to invest in the monitors. I use the quest 3 only to access my pc.
my most concern about the station is that no reviewer is pointing out that the representation looks less laggy and janky than what they preview here for us... everyone should be concerned about this because he says it's fluid but it looks like 10fps
@@BlobBlobkins exactly. Been burned so bad with those RUclips "reviewers" when they are just vessels of the PR teams of the tech firms. MKBHD is just a corporate plant at this point.
This generation all seem pretty similar, using similar Sony panels and requiring an external box to do 3DOF. I wish they could do negative diopter settings instead of just positive. I think for the price of them new, all about $4-500, I'll hold off until something better comes along, with much better FOV, proper 6DOF and positioned closer to your face instead of sitting about an inch away and looking a bit goofy. XReal do have 6DOF coming with their Ultras, although it might invoke "glasshole" rage from people who think you are filming them. I reckon 2 more years and the glasses will be miles better. For now I'll keep an eye out for some cheap second hand Xreals or something.
An honest comparison video between the Rokid AR Lite and the Xreal Air 2 pro ( with XREAL Beam Pro ) would be great !! Which one is better ? Thank you !
I just want the ability to connect to my computer wireless, control the screen with a ring or hand, and be able to bring my workspace with me, move around the screens in my visual space, wherever I go without getting in the way of my ability to interact with the world, and that includes while driving.
Does anyone remember the Olympus Eye-Trek? Well I had one and I looked stupid wearing it and nothing since has changed because, ALL these AR glasses have the exact same problem. They will never be a mainstream device until they look like a regular pair of glasses, not a pair of novelty glasses that are a inch thick, sit to high up and hover off your face!
When you look back in time aren't all hype fashion clothing and desiging not done today but in the old days we were looking for our own identity not to be copycats of algoritm advertising so all people look and do the same. When you got glasses 30 years ago you were the picking point of all bullies even if your glasses were small. The next fashion trent is holding your phone 24/7 in your left hand. Guess in 30 years humankind has evolved a third arm for holding their phone bahahaha. And who cares how you look just have fun in life don't become a slave of manipulate "normal" socials force you to believe.
@@DenisRichard-vidvid station, but they told me that probably there will be no can on the real one, as this was made for engineers, kind like a early dev kit
getting closer to being able to replace my dual monitor setup and just use glasses. Not sure how clear text is though, yeah for simple displays like youtube and the xbox app it is already pretty viable, but what if you want to do text editing/coding, would these glasses work or is the virtual display simply still too far from your eyes to read smaller text?
To be honest I think that the quality is already high enough to get there, the problem is that displaying the windows too far, it gets hard to read and use them like a monitor, I keep asking to make possible to bring windows closer (like in reading mode here) and be able to resize them as we want. Hopefully rokid will enable it
@@Tyrielwood it seems like a reasonably easy thing for them to implement (positioning of the window), I wonder why none of the AR glasses manufacturers have implemented it? It seems they're focused on it replacing your HT rather than your computer monitors perhaps
I'll wait for loads of reviews. I bought rokid max. It's not very comfortable and I can't watch it past 30 mins. Eye strain. Spoke to a fair few with same experience. I'd rather deal with more weight and use pico 4.
Wow a higher resolution, this will be so much better than the 1920x1080 the previous options had So is it 4k? 1440p? ultrawide? ..... 1920x1200 It's an extra 120 pixels vertically so it's the same thing again but with EVEN MORE HYPE I want to like these, I've been waiting for products like this to mature for decades but come on.. this is just getting embarrassing
00:23 Tracking looks jittery just like the Xreal air 2... so not actually useable for productivity I guess. Seems like only inside out tracking with a bunch of cameras can give proper tracking like on full headsets
Consider that it's 3dof so you will see every single little shacking of my hand over there, when you wear them it's not an issue because your eyes shake in the same way, being on your head 🙃
@@Tyrielwood I tried the xreal recently (on my head) and the jitter was definitely not matching my own vision... so I found it annoying to read small text on it. I think it's just that 3dof sensors don't have the same accuracy as a camera array
@@lemovision We want to share a video with you, filmed by the founder of Rokid. He comes from a programming background and uses AR Lite every day to write code: ruclips.net/video/nrIqIvdfuRU/видео.html
@@RokidGlobal Yeah that's software IPD settings. Software IPD adjustment is not good. There needs to be a physical IPD adjustment. Big deference! Thank you
Seeing the UI colors pop in such a well lit environment in the demo video looks like a massive scam. I hate how misleading it is, since these glasses can’t even get close to mixed reality that VR headsets can provide.
how is gaming on these? thats what i need to know lol.i mainly race.. and sim racing is fun but wondering should i get this and make it like triple screens in these glasses.. or should i just say screw it and pay 40$ for a quest 2 headset only. on ebay. since i only use it for racing i dont wanna spend a ton . but id use the glasses for everything so it might be worth it . but for like 40-50 bucks quest 2 for sim racing has got to be good enough? i have a rift cv-1 is it worth grabbing the quest 2 if i can get it for under 50$
Things are evolving Fast! 👀
I’d argue with that. Especially in VR
Hello,
Thank you very much,
This was very informative.
I have been wanting to buy this as my monitor replacement for a long time now
I have one feed back if possible to convey.
just like rabbit , AI pin , which can ultimately be an application on android phone
can Rokid partner up with samsung , google , oneplus etc etc,
to make a chunky android phone (big battery phone )
with 2 usb c port, and two camera
same specs on an android phone, so that Rokid can focus only on glasses not the phone aspect
My android phone is already has lots of compute power ,, which i use only to text on whatsapp and watch youtube
i just want a perfect AR glasses , the phone part is already solved
phone + glasses + good earphone + game controller + Bluetooth keyboard, its a complete package
of portable workstation + home theater + game setup
i say this because + i want to be able to connect Rokid into my laptop to continue working
if its an android and windows app it can be seamless
please consider my request
thank you
Thanks ! You mentioned the fan being a bit noisy - the fan on the glasses or the station ?
An honest comparison video between the Rokid AR Lite and the Xreal Air 2 pro ( with XREAL Beam Pro ) would be great !! Which one is better ?
Thank you !
11:18 I know what you did there.
I just got mine (beam pro) delivered last week and boy I wish they went the route without phone screen compared to the touch pad but whatever. The Rokid Station 2 is still an android device.
Laughing at you taking subliminal shots at Xreal’s beam pro.. Bro you on some sneaky shyyt 😂
Now we're really getting somewhere with these glasses
Took a chance and did my first kick starter as this looked very good.
How’s it going so far I’m thinking about it
@@falcon11700 Bought as well, earlybird, they are supposed to be delivered next month (sept) or if delayed then october.
I just want an AR glass where you can watch VR movies. Like quest 3 but more comfortable and lighter
Pretty much any pair will do so long as you're okay with a fixed display.
it will definitely happen
Ty if you still have some XReal glasses please test them with the station 2 and report back if they are compatible. Thanks !
I believe I saw another RUclipsr try and all he got was a black screen. I might be wrong though
Love your vids. You keep it moving with new things most people don’t bother to even review anymore (US centrists 🙄) So thanks for this one and others. I much enjoy them 😊🎉
Also, lmao “…right Rokit???”
😂😂😂
I do hv this rokid products last time. Pls address whether these problems are still prevalent:
1. Heat on the glasses are burning ur forehead
2. Fov is extremely narrow
3. A lot of lagging experience causing motion sickness
4. Bcuz the fov is so narrow and the resolution is so low, I doubt that it's true 200 inch movie watching. I believe it's just 30 inches the most
Problem of these AR glasses is one big issue: the need of external device to do simple things....
Minimum requirement for true next gen AR glasses in my opinion is the following:
1. Qualcomm AR2 chip with built in 6DOF support (so it works on all devices)
2. Built in battery placed at the back portion of the ear (to improve balance)
3. Have minimum of 60FOV (otherwise 3DOF or 6DOF are pointless)
4. Have brightness of at least 1500 or have dynamic dimming zones glass (to make it usable in bright areas)
In my opinion all of this is not far depending on what I saw in XR event, we will see prototype this year and maybe release in 1-2 years time
I think meta is working on that already, I’m sure Apple also has several patents for it but with Apple that’s gonna be in 10 years minimum 😂
@@fredrickbambino Meta will showcase one prototype this year I was told in their upcoming event, that prototype is the true next gen AR glasses and from there Meta + Apple + Xiaomi + some other will start AR glasses era
you are describing a vr headset basically a quest3 lol it's not meant to be that whole concept started as just a screen you can add to other devices.
@@Eskoxo it would be nice to have a quest 3 that isnt a big bulky headset strapped to your face but glasses instead, but unless we make a breakthroughs in battery capacity, that ain't happening anytime soon.
@@Eskoxo That's not VR headset lol, VR headsets have FOV of 100+ not 60 I'm asking for, also you won't need dimming zones in VR like you do in AR as well as 1500 nits not achievable in VR right now but achievable in AR.
Just wait for Meta event and you will see what I'm talking about
I like that all manufacturers of VR helmets and AR glasses are starting to come to the same menu inside the device, so it will be convenient when changing headsets, you always intuitively understand what is where,and you don’t have to get used to and study the layout of the interface menu elements in each new device.
VR that doesn't mess up your hair is coming soon!!! We're really living in the future.
It cant really function as vr headset for that best you got is bigscreen beyond.
@@Eskoxo I'm not saying Rokid is worth buying, I'm saying a real sunglasses VR solution is coming soon based on the rate of progress.
Bigscreen doesn't have passthrough / AR, so it's not worth buying IMO. I have a Quest 3 and use it regularly with virtual monitors in order to have a 3D viewport into Blender. My only complaint is the bulk. I want a sunglasses form-factor.
Can we connect to a windows computer and have 2 or 3 screens for working?
I Hope it does, It will be more usefull
Virtual desktop? Quest is also running on android.
Hi, thanks for your question! If you use the station 2 to wirelessly cast a PC, you can do multiple screens.
yes it is the most important feature for me. I have a small 1080 p monitor and I don't want to invest in the monitors. I use the quest 3 only to access my pc.
I hope this channel never ends and keeps spreading happiness❤
my most concern about the station is that no reviewer is pointing out that the representation looks less laggy and janky than what they preview here for us... everyone should be concerned about this because he says it's fluid but it looks like 10fps
thats the review i was searching for ;D
Great. Now give us an unbiased review..
there is literally 0 unbiased reviews, even for older models. I had Xreal glasses and they were so bad, I was so mad at all those positive reviewers.
@@BlobBlobkins exactly. Been burned so bad with those RUclips "reviewers" when they are just vessels of the PR teams of the tech firms. MKBHD is just a corporate plant at this point.
yall all ruthless😂😂😂
This generation all seem pretty similar, using similar Sony panels and requiring an external box to do 3DOF. I wish they could do negative diopter settings instead of just positive. I think for the price of them new, all about $4-500, I'll hold off until something better comes along, with much better FOV, proper 6DOF and positioned closer to your face instead of sitting about an inch away and looking a bit goofy. XReal do have 6DOF coming with their Ultras, although it might invoke "glasshole" rage from people who think you are filming them. I reckon 2 more years and the glasses will be miles better. For now I'll keep an eye out for some cheap second hand Xreals or something.
An honest comparison video between the Rokid AR Lite and the Xreal Air 2 pro ( with XREAL Beam Pro ) would be great !! Which one is better ?
Thank you !
Everyone would love a AR 🕶️ that can do what quest can do and also take calls and 🎥
Honestly, I still prefer Nreal with the wayfarer look. It's super neat that we have so many options now though.
im set in buying a meta quest 3 and saving for it but.... these look awesome. Not sure if getting both is justified though.
I just want the ability to connect to my computer wireless, control the screen with a ring or hand, and be able to bring my workspace with me, move around the screens in my visual space, wherever I go without getting in the way of my ability to interact with the world, and that includes while driving.
Any issues when looking at the glasses. Do you see any annoying white light?
is there a reason why the rokid station couldn't be an app for those who don't mind using he phones battery?
Due to the processing needed. And an android phone cannot give full permissions to an app the same way a dedicated operating system can.
Does anyone remember the Olympus Eye-Trek? Well I had one and I looked stupid wearing it and nothing since has changed because, ALL these AR glasses have the exact same problem. They will never be a mainstream device until they look like a regular pair of glasses, not a pair of novelty glasses that are a inch thick, sit to high up and hover off your face!
Right now it's a tech limitation for the glasses, they are not targeting an all day wearing anyway, it's more of a " here is your portable monitor "
Wrong. Looks aren’t everything. Society changes and adapts to new tech
When you look back in time aren't all hype fashion clothing and desiging not done today but in the old days we were looking for our own identity not to be copycats of algoritm advertising so all people look and do the same. When you got glasses 30 years ago you were the picking point of all bullies even if your glasses were small. The next fashion trent is holding your phone 24/7 in your left hand. Guess in 30 years humankind has evolved a third arm for holding their phone bahahaha. And who cares how you look just have fun in life don't become a slave of manipulate "normal" socials force you to believe.
If there is 3d, ill buy to play Praydog's UE vr injector using gamepad but too bad
Thanks ! You mentioned the fan being a bit noisy - the fan on the glasses or the station ?
@@DenisRichard-vidvid station, but they told me that probably there will be no can on the real one, as this was made for engineers, kind like a early dev kit
I’m wondering why they wouldn’t install a micro SD slot🧐🤦🏾…. But I’m actually digging it so far
Have you seen the Goovis Art?
شيء جميل للغاية نعم لكل شيء جديد
This time in these new models can you put a 512 or 1 TB "microSD"? this is very important.
If I can watch 4k video despite the glasses screen resolution, I’m in
Of course you can
Its gonna be 1200p at best but you can play 12K video if you want.
The Moment when you realise that you def. Need Something Like this for you Nintendo Switch ...
how is it that Rokid is still using the same dorky look?
They have the worst looking glasses on the market and just keep sticking with it.
Cool News! Do you know, if it is possible to use other glasses like XREAL Air 2 Pro with the Rokkid Station 2?
@@ROIOS-TV i actually tried, but no luck
@@Tyrielwood Thank You - This is a pity - I like the XREAL glasses but the software from them is a mess!
getting closer to being able to replace my dual monitor setup and just use glasses. Not sure how clear text is though, yeah for simple displays like youtube and the xbox app it is already pretty viable, but what if you want to do text editing/coding, would these glasses work or is the virtual display simply still too far from your eyes to read smaller text?
To be honest I think that the quality is already high enough to get there, the problem is that displaying the windows too far, it gets hard to read and use them like a monitor, I keep asking to make possible to bring windows closer (like in reading mode here) and be able to resize them as we want. Hopefully rokid will enable it
@@Tyrielwood it seems like a reasonably easy thing for them to implement (positioning of the window), I wonder why none of the AR glasses manufacturers have implemented it? It seems they're focused on it replacing your HT rather than your computer monitors perhaps
waiting for 1440p or higher. No word on price?
Movie Side-by-side 3D working ?
absolutely yes!
I'll wait for loads of reviews. I bought rokid max. It's not very comfortable and I can't watch it past 30 mins. Eye strain. Spoke to a fair few with same experience. I'd rather deal with more weight and use pico 4.
Rokid AR Lite supports eye protection mode, which we believe will make your eyes feel much more comfortable!
Wow a higher resolution, this will be so much better than the 1920x1080 the previous options had
So is it 4k? 1440p? ultrawide? ..... 1920x1200
It's an extra 120 pixels vertically
so it's the same thing again but with EVEN MORE HYPE
I want to like these, I've been waiting for products like this to mature for decades but come on.. this is just getting embarrassing
00:23 Tracking looks jittery just like the Xreal air 2... so not actually useable for productivity I guess. Seems like only inside out tracking with a bunch of cameras can give proper tracking like on full headsets
Consider that it's 3dof so you will see every single little shacking of my hand over there, when you wear them it's not an issue because your eyes shake in the same way, being on your head 🙃
@@Tyrielwood I tried the xreal recently (on my head) and the jitter was definitely not matching my own vision... so I found it annoying to read small text on it. I think it's just that 3dof sensors don't have the same accuracy as a camera array
@@lemovision well yep, that's for sure, it has 3 less axes in movement than just rotational. Hopefully glasses with cameras will arrive soon!
@@lemovision We want to share a video with you, filmed by the founder of Rokid. He comes from a programming background and uses AR Lite every day to write code: ruclips.net/video/nrIqIvdfuRU/видео.html
how is the edge to edge re: clarity of text
It's crazy these AR glasses companies are not implementing any IPD settings. I have to look cross-eyed to get a clear picture which is not healthy
@@YeahYeahItsJustin they finally have the option here
@@Tyrielwood Oh no they do not have any IPD settings
@@YeahYeahItsJustin You can find IPD settings at 06:57
@@RokidGlobal Yeah that's software IPD settings. Software IPD adjustment is not good. There needs to be a physical IPD adjustment. Big deference!
Thank you
Try it
The screen resolution ratio sounds strange
Perhaps… but eye glasses aren’t in TV or computer screen ratios, I don’t think. (Don’t know for sure tho)
Were you paid for this Video?
Seeing the UI colors pop in such a well lit environment in the demo video looks like a massive scam. I hate how misleading it is, since these glasses can’t even get close to mixed reality that VR headsets can provide.
All scenes in the video are captured through Rokid AR Lite screen recording, showcasing true-to-life colors.
First non-bot comment
You could be a bot too... 🤔 How do we know
Parece fácil mas pra mim não é😀
why is it lite ...if it's rokid max
I have no clue, I think they could work on the name again :) it feels like the .... Lite... Version , and it shouldn't
@@Tyrielwoodwill Station 2 work with Rokid Air?
1200p can scaleto 1440p very closely. But its still short of 4k so thats a shame.
4k microoled displays are way too expensive now unfortunately
Right Rokid? Lol
Why do they try to make them look like sunglasses? They look really stupid on your face..so high and forward.
Random people proably think your crazy
Why are they even trying? None gonna buy it, only whats left, is to wait for contact eye lenses.
I can't wear these because I have an astigmatism.
Hello, our glasses support the installation of additional lenses. Maybe one day you can give it a try!
Meta shoudl buy this company - itis bascially quast light and light means you can wear it for hours.
Fov
50th like!
how is gaming on these? thats what i need to know lol.i mainly race.. and sim racing is fun but wondering should i get this and make it like triple screens in these glasses.. or should i just say screw it and pay 40$ for a quest 2 headset only. on ebay. since i only use it for racing i dont wanna spend a ton . but id use the glasses for everything so it might be worth it . but for like 40-50 bucks quest 2 for sim racing has got to be good enough? i have a rift cv-1 is it worth grabbing the quest 2 if i can get it for under 50$