Sviatoslav Richter in Moscow (Jan. 10, 1952) Chopin, Rachmaninov, Liszt, Scriabin, Ravel
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 дек 2011
- Chopin
00:00 - Prelude Op.45
04:59 - Polonaise Op.26 No.1
13:08 - Polonaise Op.40 No.1
18:22 - Polonaise Op.40 No.2
25:34 - Polonaise-Fantasie Op.61
Liszt
37:38 - Vallée d'Obermann
Scriabin
51:58 - Etude Op.2 No.1
54:02 - Etude Op.8 No.5
56:22 - Etude Op.42 No.2
57:16 - Etude Op.42 No.3
57:51 - Etude Op.42 No.5
01:00:37 - Etude Op.42 No.6
01:02:28 - Etude Op.8 No.11
01:06:38 - Etude Op.42 No.8
01:08:28 - Etude Op.65 No.1
01:11:48 - Etude Op.65 No.2
01:13:56 - Etude Op.65 No.3
Rachmaninov
01:15:59 - Melodie Op.3 No.3
01:22:25 - Etude Op.32 No.12
Scriabin
01:25:10 - Mazurka Op.25 No.3
Ravel
01:27:28 - Jeux d'eau
no copyright infringement intended
/ newfranzferencliszt 
Видеоклипы
How Splendid! Richter is the greatest musician of all time. No one play like this..
this recital no doubt shows us Richter at the prime of his prowess, none of the piece is simple task to carry out, those short Scriabin etudes, each takes months, even years to perfect the technique demanded, and Richter conquered them all in one stroke and made them deceivingly easy and uniquely beautiful. Unlike his later days's concerts sometime filled with languorous tones and dragging speed, this performance is lively with technical panache, accuracy and refreshment juxtaposed with occasional delicate nuances and poesy. wonder how many pianists nowadays can put out such a repertoire that attains such technical perfection and musical profundity. just by this one concert can Richter make his name in the history of human civilization.
Sviatoslav Richter, No one else could handle such a variety of repertoire and pull them all off so well; he was truly great.
Absolutely agreed :-)
Sometimes I'm amazed at Richter's vast repertoire and a wide range of spectrum..In addiction, his virtuosity and dexterity is always excellent..No one could do well like Richter. His interpretation of each piece & rendition is marvelous.. I adore S.Richter forever and ever ~~^^;
I can never hear clumsy young contemporary pianists again. Some composers I was unmoved by turn wonderful in his hands.
Я никогла не мечтала услышать эту редкую запись. Счастье и чудо! Просто! Понятно! Страстно! Гениально!Какое счастье,что мы можем услышать Рихтера такого,каким он был в то далёкое время.Это никогда не умрёт!
リヒテルの演奏はテンポも音の音色もとても素晴らしてです。どの作曲家の作品も最高レベルの演奏で何度聴いても私の心を虜にしてくれます。ショパン、ラフマニノフ、リスト、スクリャビン，ラベルの楽曲、それぞれの楽曲が素晴らしい出来です。これからリヒテルの演奏を楽しみにしています。心が癒されます。ありがとうございます。
Con Cortot, mai ascoltato il sublime preludio op.45 di Chopin, la sua pagina più bella, eseguito in maniera così stupefacente ! ( Richter aveva 36 anni, e chissà - a detta di Rattalino - come gesticolasse in questo concerto, a dispetto della ieraticità dei concerti della tarda età !).
Amazing Richter! Thank you for uploading.
visionary , philosophic, and with dignity and depth ( Chopin, Op.61 ! )
beautiful sonority, touch od-f great differentiation, the great period for SR .......
Extraordinaire "Vallée d'Obermann"! Richter au sommet...
The Great One - live = without peer....magnifique....Scriabin mesmerizing flying colors....celestial heaven 🚀❇🌙
The prelude op. 45 of Chopin is an outstanding isolated work, a poorly known small msaterpiece. The last studies of >Scriabin are also pooorly known. Jeaux d'eau of Mauricce Ravel is indeed the first piece in wich he found a style of his o
Exquisite. Superb interpretation and playing.
What a great upload! Thank you!
В трудные годы искусство всегда на высоте... Рихтер - чудо!!
最初のプレリュードのなんと音の美しいこと！聴き出しから夢中にさせられる！愛するリヒテル！
So sublime..~
How exciting to hear the comparatively young Richter, already showing extraordinary talent and individuality in what would still have been Stalinist Russia. Apart from the way he pretty well beats the famous Polonaise in A into submission I love the youthful volatility and ardour of his Chopin, and his Scriabin performances are simply matchless.
Some how one of his best year - also the piano tuner/technisian had done excellent work
Спасибо, Рихтер))))))
Richter-my idol!
What a recital that was. A huge amount of Skrjabin pieces that are a masterpieces one by one.
Божественно! Браво!!!
This is a wonderful upload. Before I subscribe to anybody I look in their area to see what kind of collection they have. Yours is wonderful, hence my subscription. ASCAP has it backwards. When I hear something that I like on RUclips I try to find the CD. Sadly, Amazon is releasing more and more MP3s and deleting the corresponding CDs. I will not buy an MP3 - partly because they sound awful and partly because I don't have an MP3 player or the desire to buy one.
I agree. They should at least provide a loss-less download option, which is what you get when you buy a CD.
Pol Gómez Riquelme Thanks. It's always nice to know that at least one person agrees with me.
Einfach der Größten Pianisten mal gewesen des Menschens!!!
I agree..IMHO no one can play Rachmaninoff concerto #2 like Richter. He is the finest virtuoso to ever play the piano. in his prime he could not be equaled.
Every snippet of information I gather about Richer is that for most of his life he was only modestly wealthy. Perhaps in his last few years he gained.
Рояль в щепки, но как-то лампово и по-настоящему!
Laureate of the Stalin prize, the same bastard who had his father murdered for fear of his German extraction. Richter must have been emotionally scarred and with an armour around his heart to be able to survive those times.
Thanks for this great recording ! ;) just a small correction - at 01:22:25 is Rachmaninov's prelude op.32 no.12 , not etude .
Некоторые произведения из этого концерта Рихтер в дальнейшем играл лучше. Например, полонезы Шопена, на мой взгляд, он лучше играл в 1992 году, а "Долина Обермана" мне больше нравится в московской записи от 2 марта 1956 года. И, - тем не менее, - представленная здесь запись концерта 10 января 1952 года - эта запись бесценна!
01:22:25 - Etude Op.32 No.12 is actually Prelude Op.32 No.12
" Preludium " he is saying
@@hansdekorver7365 you're right. But look in the description of the video. It says etude op 32 no 12.
@@jacquestomsil2185 O.k. , someone made a mistake.
@@hansdekorver7365 Anyway, may the channel administrator correct the mistake so that those who do not know this work are not confused
01:22:25 *prelude op 32 no 1
Lovely 8 11
wow, is this great music or what...
holy shit.
this is gods Music........coming from the communist state russia.....the communists are gone.....thank god. this Music and richter will be forever
was it usual to have a presentator for the program in between songs? they didn't have programs?
yaniku
I don't know whether it's my laptop and speaker, but the sound quality is absolutely terrible.
50s Russian recording played on youtube through laptop speakers, yeah, that is the definition of terrible sound quality.
Use ear phones.
Or amplifier connected to good speakers.
😘😘😘
43:19
It's impossible even imagine situation like these. It was last year of Stalin's life. He was old and his wealth wasn't good.
Stalin preferred theater like Bolshoi theater. There was especial organized "invisible" closed loge in Bolshoi.
It was not Stalin tradition to visit Moscow Conservatory Concert Hall.
His idea of the Op.40 Nr 1 here is not all that fortunate. Maybe he does it better somewhere else.
Damm, this is a great performance if their is one. Maybe a bit of the Russian dynamics, in some of the heavy parts but it is not disturbing.
Wow I had no idea Richter had recorded Rach Op 3/3! Don't think the pianist is really suited to this kind of charming but light salon music.
Is it possible that stalin was present here?
3800
The Soviet background, survival, support of the system by failure of dissent, by their public presence, high profile performances- commanded or volunteered- in effect approving of the Stalinist regime- casts a dreadful shadow over the integrity and souls of these quite outstanding musicians, and presents many paradoxes too. What if you or I had been in their shoes? On a point of detail, Boris Pasternak, an obvious target, it is attested to, was protected by Stalin, for whatever bizarre reason.
+Ralph Berney Is this fair in Richter's case? With Rostropovich, he championed Prokofiev in the teeth of the Stalinist Zhdanov decree of 1948. He played at Pasternak's funeral in 1960, despite militia and KGB surveillance.
Perhaps,even probably, not fair, as you make a strong case; under fundamentally evil and oppressive regimes- whatever the possibly of good and noble intentions in their origin, the bare reality is that all people subject to their power, control and coercion- never mind the propaganda- are faced with a dreadful choice, a dilemma that determines survival, however compromised one's beliefs and principles, or degrees of downfall to the bitter base of social elimination come death/murder. Artists of all kinds, of course musicians, are put in an impossible position, to serve the regime in order to serve their art, or seek to ride and tip toe across a high wire, lurching to either side.
What a bunch of hooey, for God's sake.
Your comments are utterly ridiculous to say the least. Despite your nonsense, USSR was an ideal place for music and culture in general to flourish. USSR (and Russia) gave the world the best amongst pianists and violinists of all time. In comparison the "democratic" US attained no more than 0.01% of what USSR produced in music performance in '900. Just to give an example, name please one single north american pianist who deserves to share the table with the multitude of the Richter/Gilels/Sofronitsky/ etc etc etc. And none of the north american pianists ever complained or raised their heads against the US violent dominination and complete disregard of Intl law shown in over 100 years. So, please, what are you talking about?
adalberto piazzolata - I beleive this happened because of the fact that Russian school had more connections to "cradle" of the pianism, I mean great composers and performers of romantic music, and USSR "inherited" these connections. Nothing in greateness of Richter/Gilels/Sofronitsky's (I admire all of them) has to do with USSR. It was just a state/territory where they lived and suffered.