TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 The Mind-Body Problems 04:12 The allure of science mysteries. 10:30 Philosophy's role in science. 15:20 Contemplating consciousness. 25:16 Determinism and free will. 30:15 Implications of denying free will. 38:10 Robert Sapolsky's challenge to free will. 46:00 Dennett on competence without comprehension. 58:25 The beauty of recognizing life's improbability. 1:06:40 Balancing truth with practicality. 1:15:40 Challenges in modern science. 1:25:02 The importance of humility in scientific claims. THANKS FOR WATCHING! If you enjoyed the content, please like this video, subscribe to the channel and turn on notifications for future updates. :)
IIT is not wrong but very close. I say that from an engineer's perspective. I greatly respect these two men having this conversation but this is a classical case of trying to solve an engineering problem when you have no engineering intuitions.
I was on the fence at first. Thumbnails don't leave much room for context, so we as a team decide what's best. What do you think of this one? I like the feedback!
@@drtevinnaidu It was very interesting. I do like how you managed to weave your questions & dialogue and his history and the book. I’m fascinated by his candour & admission of bias in several aspects. Easy to follow and informative all round.
TIMESTAMPS:
00:00 The Mind-Body Problems
04:12 The allure of science mysteries.
10:30 Philosophy's role in science.
15:20 Contemplating consciousness.
25:16 Determinism and free will.
30:15 Implications of denying free will.
38:10 Robert Sapolsky's challenge to free will.
46:00 Dennett on competence without comprehension.
58:25 The beauty of recognizing life's improbability.
1:06:40 Balancing truth with practicality.
1:15:40 Challenges in modern science.
1:25:02 The importance of humility in scientific claims.
THANKS FOR WATCHING!
If you enjoyed the content, please like this video, subscribe to the channel and turn on notifications for future updates. :)
IIT is not wrong but very close. I say that from an engineer's perspective. I greatly respect these two men having this conversation but this is a classical case of trying to solve an engineering problem when you have no engineering intuitions.
Trippy😅
🪬
“The end of science”? Disappointing & dismaying header there. I know it’s the title of his book, but still…
I was on the fence at first. Thumbnails don't leave much room for context, so we as a team decide what's best. What do you think of this one? I like the feedback!
@@drtevinnaidu It was very interesting. I do like how you managed to weave your questions & dialogue and his history and the book. I’m fascinated by his candour & admission of bias in several aspects. Easy to follow and informative all round.
Thanks Christopher!
Well....if we are seeing an end to religion! Why not the same for science? But I think he is really saying "rethinking" which is not quite as catchy.