I've owned this lens for four years and I agree with everything you said, Dan. I think it's the sharpest lens I've ever used! I only need to use it more often.
Thanks for the comment, Terry. Same. I’ll admit that I occasionally go through periods when I don’t shoot with it, but as soon as I pick it up again, the love is instantly rekindled. ❤️
Thank you Dan. I couldn't agree more with everything you said about the 90mm f2, the best lens on the planet.hahah. A friend of friend used to get really annoyed when I said that to him. Joke apart I purchased the 90mm after owning the 50-140 and because of the wieght and bulk I'd rather choose to shoot with the 90mm over the 50-140mm and the 90mm is ideal for portrait.As you said I can carry it all day without any complain and it nail the subject with a crisp razor sharp every single time. I carry the 16mm, the 56, the 35f2 and the 90 mm on my engagement shoot. I usaually end up using the 35 and the 90 mm for the most part of my shots. Take care.
Nas, that’s such a versatile combination. And it’s totally the best lens on the planet! 😀 In this video, I show two jumping mountain bike shots. During that shoot, I was trying to nail them with the 50-140, but was having trouble getting a good AF lock in just the right moment. I went ahead and switched to the 90 and ended up nailing both shots on the very next try. The 50-140 is a great action lens, but I do think the 90 has the edge with regards to AF speed.
Thank you Dan, you did answer me and it helped resolve the issue. However I have another issue with the Xt4 and I even went to store to see if they can set something different in the menu to fix but the salesperson said that’s the way the Xt4 is. I owned the xt3 as well and I am wedding photographer. I don’t see that delay that is long like the Xt4 when the camera goes to sleep. The xt3 respond a lot quicker than the Xt4. Lately I”be been using the Xt4 mainly but having to wait a little longer than the Xt3 is annoying . The lcd screen stayed black too long before I can see the subject. Any idea how to fix that issue. Thanks Dan.
Nas, I’m not sure you can fix that. I haven’t used the X-T4, but my guess is that it performs this way to maximize battery life. The X-T3 has a quicker screen-dimming than the X-T2, because it’s faster processor needs to exact even more power from the same battery. One possible solution is to put the camera into High Performance mode and see if that makes a difference.
@@nasroullahdinally5140 A couple things it might be. If slow to turn off/on, could be "sensor cleaning" and you can turn that off if its an issue as it doesn't really do much. If its slow after taking a shot, it could be the clarity setting, which makes it really slow if its set to anything other than 0.
I love this lens. I think zooms are where it's at for landscape photography, given you cannot always zoom with your feet, such as when you're standing at the edge of a cliff ... you could zoom with your feet to an untimely death. Still, I echo your sentiments about primes. The constraints of a single FL can make one a better, more resourceful photographer. I especially love the challenges of shooting with a long prime like the 90. It's a matter of deciding what elements to distill. It's awfully fun and the image quality is, of course, top notch.
Daniel, good points. One wouldn't want to zoom towards an untimely death! 😱 I do like the flexibility of zooms for shooting landscapes and other subject matter, especially things like sports and action,, but I also love the simplicity of primes as well. I use both quite often in my photography.
Yeah, I love the angle of view provided by a 135mm lens. It was the first lens I bought for my brand new Minolta SR-T-303 in 1974 (it came with a 50mm 1.7), and you're right: you get used to what a prime will do, so you can pretty much frame without even raising the camera. However, I only just moved from a Nikon D750 to a Fujifimn X-T30 almost exactly a year ago; it came with an 18-55mm lens, and I bought the 55-200 and the 10-24, not to mention miscellaneous other accessories. It's time, I think, to take a break for a while. Still, that 90mm looks awfully good...
Thank you very much. I have using 56mm 1.2 for years. Now i am going to buy a XT4 and thinking to try this 90mm but havent made my mind. Thanks for the information!👍🌹
Thanks Cecelia. I'm glad you found this helpful. Let me know if you have any more questions. The 90 is really an amazing lens, and I don't think you'd be disappointed. 👍
Absolutely 100% agree with everything in this video Dan. I did my first wedding shoot with the 90mm on my X-H1 at the weekend and it was an absolute joy to use. Tack sharp and never missed focus once (other than operator error!) To think I was previously lugging around my 6d mk ii and 70-200 f2.8 is just madness. I had it paired with the 35mm f2 on my X-T30 which was also fantastic. The one thing I took away is I think a 16mm or 23mm f1.4 would be the ideal accompaniment to the 90mm.
Gareth, it's an entirely different world shooting with the 90mm on an X Series body compared to a 70-200 2.8 on a big DSLR, and it's not like you're sacrificing quality. The 90 is amazing, and it does have extremely quick AF, even faster than the autofocus on the 50-140. And I would agree, the 23mm f/1.4 is also an incredible, razor sharp lens that would pair extremely well with the 90. Those two lenses would make an excellent combination for shooting things like weddings and portraits.
You got my attention when you mentioned how light weight the lens is! I did not know about this lens. Love the view & sharpness. Thanks for the lesson. I will be getting one.
GeorgeAnna, I think you’ll really enjoy the 90. It really is an amazing lens, and it’s no bigger than most kit zooms, but with much sharper, faster glass. Definitely one of the gems in the X Series system. 👍
Got the lens! In fact, it came early! Took it into my backyard; for a test run;. Wow, you were right! This is a sharp lens! What a difference it makes.. Hope to take it on a more fun shoot soon (lots of fire & smoky air in the region right now).
Thanks Dan. I have this Lens in my bag. It’s a beautiful optics. I really appreciated your enthusiasm for it because it’s a perfect lens for many situations. I shoot events and portraits and this Lens is a beast in these situations. Thanks Mike aka Fuji Warrior. 👍🏽
Hi Michael, thanks for the comment. The 90 is definitely one of the real gems in the system, although given the increasing number of lenses in their line, I can imagine that it's one that gets overlooked by people. It really is amazing for shooting a wide variety of scenes. 👍
I've had the 90 in my bag rarely pulled it out. But now after your review on it. I see 👀 it in a new perspective. I always reached for the 56mm or 16mm. I will purposely use the 90mm only for awhile. New perspectives rather than old habits
Navalee, yes the 90 is an amazing lens. And that's a good way of looking at it. Breaking away from old habits is a good way to foster new creative possibilities.
I can't wait to get this. I had a Canon 100mm 2.8 II Macro and it was pretty good but not even close enough to what i would like. I use the Canon TS-E lenses the most and they are insanely sharp. I'm using the Xt-3 more and more now and the 90mm 2.0 is my best hope for great portraits
You're going to love the 90, it's ridiculously sharp, and definitely a great lens for portraits and isolating razor sharp subjects against a soft background. 👍
Helpful video Dan. I’m not too long into Fuji (X-T1) and have already purchased the 35 f2 and 16 f1.4 (both WR). I’ve kept my Canon 40D and own a long range Tamron 18 - 270 which is outstanding for general street photography (in good light!), so although I’m tempted to acquire a WR rated telephoto lens for the Fuji, I may get try and get by with the Canon / Tamron for now and look out for a 90 f2 for my X-T1
Thanks for your comment. The 90 would be an excellent choice for a mid range telephoto on the X-T1. You'll find the quality to be excellent and the size/weight. make it very portable. Along with your 35 and 16 lenses, you'd have an excellent and very compact Fuji kit what would give you the wide/middle/long range view angles. Whenever I'm putting together a lens combination for heading out, whether it's for a short excursion or an extended shoot, this is how I always think: Wide, Middle, Long. This lets you cover all your bases without unnecessary duplication in your kit and overloading your camera bag. How are you liking the X-T1 so far?
@@DanBaileyPhoto i shoot a variety of subjects from macro,landscapes and food photography to portraits! as i have nearly every fuji lens i shoot most genre's! i love your reviews Dan.
Really want this lens! I have low light sports events and maybe weddings coming up this year and I'd love to use/own this. The 50-140 will probably be the sensible option, but I'd prefer to only rent that lens. There are 90 F2 lenses available second hand for under $500 and it's so tempting.
The 90mm is definitely a great lens for shooting low light and inside events. The wide f/2 aperture and quad liner AF motor make it a very fast performer. And $500 is a really good price, 1/3 of what a brand new 50-140 costs!!
You're very clear headed. I only have the 16-50 3.5, which has it's moments...and the now the 23mm 2.0. That baby.... So seeing this, looks like I'll be back to burritos made of wood chips and dreams for a while...
Great video/tutorial as usual Dan. When I started watching the video I said to myself, no, I don't need this lens, for portraits I like the XF-50 f/2 and for every day carry I bring along the XF 16-80 and the XF 55-200, but after watching the video in its entirety you made me think about adding it to my collection, (you’re a great salesman, LOL) I don't do any professional work, so I can wait for a Fujifilm special. Stay safe.
Enrique, thanks for the comment. It really is a great lens, and even though you can get similar results from others lenses, there’s something really special about the 90. And it’s actually on sale right now with a $150 rebate.
Very thorough review! I just received the 90mm as a gift so I’m eager to test it out in landscapes and street photography. You sharing your experiences are extremely helpful and inspiring.
Thanks for the comment, Charles. That's a very nice gift, indeed! You'll have a lot of fun with the 90mm lens. I hope my video inspires you to shoot some great photos with it!
@@DanBaileyPhoto I got it. I fell in love with the 135mm full frame with my canon 5d mk4. This didn’t disappoint. I’m using an xh2 since it’s got ibis and I really haven’t had any desire past the xtrans3 sensor. I am a concert photographer in the music scene so I use it for concerts or portraits for press kits.
Ryan, that's an interesting, but I'd say very accurate way to describe images shot with the 90. There is something special about that lens that creates wonderful photos. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot with it?
Need to look into this lens after watching your review. I have the 50 to 140 and love it. But this lens is lighter and from watching the video seems like it could be a good walking around lens especially in low light.
@@DanBaileyPhoto Well Dan, I am new in this art. I bought a Xt3 with a kit len 18-55 mm f2.8 LM OIS. But I am not sure about the lens, but I would like to buy on prime len. I have a store where I sell food products . I want to take pictures and put the pictures in Instagram to promote my store. So, my question is : What lens do you suggest considering that I already have a 18-55 mm. I like to take beautiful photos in streets and fields like farms, animals, so I thought about this 90 mm. What do you recommend? or do you think that my idea to keep my 18-55 mm and buy 90 mm is best choise. Or will you suggest one 33 mmF1.4 R LM WR or 24 mm f1.4 R LM WR. Thanks for your help . I realy apreciate. You are very nice.
Thanks, Pierre. It really is a great lens, I think you'd enjoy using it. How is your black and white photography lately? Do you still prefer shooting in Velvia and converting to BW in LR, over shooting straight ACROS?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Hi Dan. I have just ordered the 90 mm f2. To answer your question I finally differentiate the way I shoot according to the camera I use. With my Xpro2 I shoot in Acros directly. With my X-T and X70 I still shoot in Velvia and then, according to the specific view, convert in Black and white with Lihgt room or Silver Efex Pro2. In addition I came back to the old way I used in the past in argentic process using a Canon A1. My problem now is to find time and subjects and choose the right hardware...Hope to hear or read you soon. Regards, Pierre
Dan - Thanks for the video and possibly taking some money out of my pocket. I have many of the Fuji zooms but no primes. I do have the 50-140 and my cameras are the X-T2 & 3. Find myself not using the 50-140 much and mainly shoot landscapes and wildlife. The 90mm sounds interesting but need to see how it would fit into what I shoot. My other lenses are the 10-24, 18-55, and 55-200.
Steve, thanks for your comment. Yes, the 90 is very good lens, but it's expensive enough to take some time and consider how it would fit into your style. That said, I've always felt that every photographer should have at least one fast prime, and in my opinion, a normal or short telephoto prime gives you the most benefits of having that wide aperture.
Great review! I'd love to see you do something to help those of us having a hard time choosing a telephoto (for landscape mostly) on the fuji system. I got a 50-230 for my first and it's fine for the price but I'd like to upgrade at some point!
Timothé, Fuji has quite a few good telephoto lenses in their line. Obviously, the 90mm is an incredible lens, and I've already shown you what you can do with it in this video. I actually like the 55-200 for shooting landscapes, it gives you good versatility, a longer focal length and excellent stabilization, and it's not too expensive. The 18-135 is another good one, also stabilized, and gives you a wider range of focal lengths. And I love the 100-400mm for isolating distant subject matter. It's considerably bigger and heavier and it costs a little bit more, but the 100-400 is an incredible lens. I'll probably do a video about that one soon. 😀 Hope that helps.
I was convinced I was gonna buy the Viltrox 85 (4340 new on ebay), but I just can't pull the trigger.. better to save a couple more months and get the 90.. I love to save money and will often take the cheaper route, but in this case I don't want to settle for anything less then the absolute best.. I always shot the 135 f2L when I had my canon set up, so the 90 has a lot to live up to
Hey, thanks for the comment. Yes, sometimes it's definitely worth spending the extra money. If you have experience shooting with the old 135 f/2 lenses, then you know exactly what the benefit will be to save up and treat yourself with the 90. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
I live in a small coastal town in the Dominican Republic.. I shoot anything from real estate to beauty pageants and of course a lot of sessions on the amazing beaches nearby.. Earning potential here is very limited so I try to keep costs down.. I shoot X-T2 (T1 back up).. I'm pretty simple, I can shoot just about everything with the xf 35 f2 (love it).. when I need wider I have the 18 f2 ($200) .. (for real estate an adapted Canon 10-18 ($150)).. I spent a lot to get the 56 as my 'Wow' lens .. but it has been, at times, disappointing.. the focusing accuracy, on the T2 at least, makes the lens not as reliable and enjoyable as I need it to be.. When I shot Canon I bought, hated and sold the 85 1.8.. but when I got the 135 it was love at first shot and served me well for many years.. .. I'm a 'family guy' wife, 2 kids, vehicle payments etc.. so the $400 I saved for the Viltrox has already meant sacrifice.. another $400 for a used Fuji means I have to lie to the wife hahahaha.. I love my Fujis, I won't be changing systems in the foreseeable future, so $400 spread out over a couple of years for my main lens, isn't really very much.. I'm sure my clients would be more than happy with the images from the Viltrox, as they have been with the 56, but for me, for my own personal enjoyment and satisfaction.. I need to have the 90 .. plus my birthday (53) is on Monday, so that gives me a legitimate excuse, doesn't it?
That's a really good way to look at it. Good equipment is an investment, and over time the cost will amortize, and it will likely pay for itself, since it sounds like you have clients who will be very happy with the images you shoot with that lens. 👍
Thanks for sharing how you use this lens. Do you ever use the 16mm lens? If so, in what situation? Also curious if you compared the 90mm to the 80mm macro.
Ric, I have shot with the 16 f/2.8 a few times, and I think it’s a great lens that compliments the other small primes nicely. My main wide angle has been the 14 f/2.8. That was one of my first Fuji lenses, and I like the extra width. I like that the 16 I a little smaller, though. I prefer the 90 over the 80, mostly because it’s smaller and lighter. The 80 a fantastic lens, nearly identical to the 90 in quality but it’s quite a bit bigger and heavier, mostly due to the addition of the stabilization elements.
I've heard really good things about that lens. One of the Fujifilm tech reps has told me that the 16 1.4 is his favorite lens as well. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Hello, Dan. Thanks, again, for the review! I dove into Fuji with the XT4 and always try to pack the 16mm (1.4), 100-400mm, and the kit lens wherever I go. The 90mm just arrived yesterday.
Yes, the 90 really is a special lens. I would imaging that exact design of any lens is dictated largely by its size and physical characteristics. I wonder if they'll use the Quad Linear AF motor in more of their designs in the future.
Looking to keep my kit small and simple - I was looking for a telephoto for sports. It's good to see that you also shoot cycling! I like to shoot crits, and races at the velodrome (indoors). I want a lens that's able to do well in lower light at the track but also affordable and light. I currently use a Tamron 70-180 on Sony and thats around 800g. The fuji is heavier, and twice the price of the 90mm f2... I wanted to know your opinion about whether the 90mm would be a good alternative for the 50-140. I know you said it would be more of an addition than a replacement for your purposes, but I only use telephoto for sports. Otherwise I want to use an 18/35 combo. (trying my best to not be tempted into getting hte 16-55)
Thanks for your comment. Yes, I do think the 90 is a good altneriative to the 50-140. Not only is the 90 quite a bit smaller and lighter, it also has very vast AF. I've been in situations when the 90 actually outperformed the 50-140 with regard to autofocus, so yes, it's an excellent optic and there's no reason you couldn't use it as a dedicated action lens.
Thanks for your comment! The 90mm has a really nice, smooth focus ring, so I think would be very usable for cinematic filming. I don't know if I've shot much video with it, but I know I've shot some. It's just an awesome lens all around. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
Good stuff ... you sold me. Is it comfortable with the X-E3? Years ago I had a MF Pentax 120/2.8 which I loved and miss.... this should be my Fuji answer
This is a great review. I’ve owned the 90, but sold it because my 56 saw so much more use. That said, I’m going on a backpacking trip soon and am thinking of buying it again and traveling with the 14, the 27, and the 90. Is that crazy? I’ve also been contemplating just an 18 and 56. So many choices!
Hi Joshua. No, that’s not crazy, it sounds like just the kind of lightweight prime lens kit I’d take on a backcountry trip myself. That’s a fantastic combination and would give you wide, middle and long focal lengths, in a high quality and compact setup. If you have the space, that would by my choice over the 18 and 56, because the 90 will give you more soft background telephoto options at medium and longer distances. Where are you going on your backpacking trip?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Thanks, Dan, that's really helpful! We'll be in the Sierras for about five days. I'm trying to keep things lightweight. I also have a 16-80, so that's a possibility, too. It would certainly be nice to travel with one camera, one lens; on the other hand, the three primes would keep less weight on the camera at any given time, and I'm guessing the image quality would be higher. Do you tend to backpack with zooms or primes?
Hi Dan have you had a chance to try the new XF70-300 yet? I’m considering this or the XF90. The versatility of the XF90 is great, (for portraits) just don’t know if the reach is enough compression for shooting landscapes with this. I have the 16/1.4 and 35/2 with X-T1. Thanks!
Shidan, I have not tried the 70-300 yet. The 90 is an awesome lens, but if you like to shoot longer telephoto landscapes and use strong compression in your images, that 70-300 would be an excellent choice. Granted, it's not as fast as the 90, but it does have OIS stabilization, which the 90 does not have.
I’ve used all three of those programs, and I think they all have pros and cons. I’ve used Lightroom for years, and it’s pretty comprehensive, so it’s hard to move away from that program. Capture One does an exceptional job with color and RAW rendering, especially with the Fuji colors. I also like the simplicity of Luminar, compared to the complexity of Capture One. I also think that Brian has done an impressive job with Iridient Developer. I used it for awhile a few years ago. However, as much as I like and tried to incorporate all of these programs in to some form of my workflow, I realized that I was complicating my digital photography life. Add in the fact that I absolutely love the Fuji Jpegs straight out of camera, these days I’ve embraced the notion of shooting Jpeg as often as possible. I still use Lightroom for my main catalog, and use Luminar for much of my occasional processing. Again, though, I spend most of my energy trying to nail it in the moment and being really happy with the Fuji Jpegs. When I need/want to process, I usually use Luminar. Hope that helps. I know I gave you a long winded answer, but I’m a huge proponent of embracing the capabilities of today’s cameras and spending less time sitting at my computer editing images, as I outline in this video: Shooting For The Moment: Why You Should Embrace The Fuji JPEGS ruclips.net/video/BCEUaHLuoEM/видео.html
I'm not too familiar with the Viltrox, but from what I have seen, it's a decent lens. I don't think it will match the sharpness of Fuji's 90mm, but it does get the job done at a considerably lower price. The 90 is really hard to beat, so I guess it comes down to whether you want to pay for that quality. In the long run, if you truly love a lens, the extra few hundred dollars usually end up being pretty negligible, and would probably end up being spent on something dumb, like bills, gas, or expensive coffee. 😆 Given that you have all of the other f/2 primes, then my advice would be to go for the 90.
Federico, thanks for your comment. Yes, I did have some audio balance issues with my earlier videos, but I’ve since fixed that problem. I apologize for the inconvenience. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
Which Fuji cameras are you using now Dan? I use the 90mm on my H1, because it has IBIS. I'm not interested in the T4 because of that terrible screen. Do you find the image quality of the X-H1 comparable with the later models like the T3 and T4. Thanks Dan!
Philip, I'm currently using the X-T3. The X-H1 has the same sensor and processor as the X-T2, which I always found to give amazing image quality. The back side illuminated sensor has a few more pixels and slightly better low light sensitivity, and the updated processor give it slightly better color rendition. In real world terms, I'd say the X-T2/X-H1 image quality can absolutely hold up to the newer models. Photos from those camera still look incredible. When I browse through my favorite images that I shot with my X-T2, X-T1 and even the X20, I'm still impressed and am still in love with the colors and the overall look of the images, as much as I am with my recent X-T3 images. Our modern technology world makes it so that all the camera companies have to chase each other every year, and that means they continually upgrade models on a regular basis. However, Fujifilm builds the X Series so that each model has lasting legacy and can give you years of enjoyment and great performance. So yes, the X-H1 still produces wonderful looking images. Bottom line, if you're happy with the images you're making, then there's never a need to rush out and get the latest camera.
Coffee...? Who needs coffee? I'm my own coffee. 🤣 Thanks for your comment, I'm glad you liked this review. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I use X-Pro3 and with it I mainly use the Touit 32mm, 56mm, and the 50-140. I take photos of my travel around Korea and Japan--and most of the photos are street snaps and landscapes. Again, this was a good review--both informative and entertaining!
Cool. I think you'll really like the X-T4, it's an amazingly powerful camera. Have fun with it. My guide will definitely help you get acquainted with what it can do. Is this your first Fuji?
Actually my plan is to pair it with 16mm f1.4 and my x-t3 and do some hiking. I prefer primes and I really looking to keep my kit light and simple and may sideline my 80mm (don’t really do much true macro) and 50-140mm f2.8. I have some weight restrictions due to back and neck issues and these two fabulous primes should suit my needs nicely.
Michael, do you already have the 16 f/1.4? If not, and you want to go lightweight, you might consider the 14mm f/2.8. It's quite a bit lighter than the 16mm f/1.4. Or even the newer 16 f/2.8. That 14mm is an amazing lens, though, it's been my go-to wide angle Fuji lens for years. Super sharp, close focus and considerably lighter than the 16. The 16 f/2.8 is even smaller and lighter. For a hiking kit, I wold consider one of those two over the 16 f/1.4, especially if you're concerned about saving weight.
guys I need ADVICE (Please) I am struggling with decision what I should buy 50-200 or 90mm, I take mostly Landscapes pic, Architecture, my shots call them postcards coz I love that kind photography. 50-200 on plus is that u can change distance and have IS but minus it is not so that sharp as 90mm and is NOT WR, 90mm is dem sharp and is WR. Guys some advice examples? Thx for you advice.
Marcin, both are great lenses, and each have their strengths. Yes, the 90 is amazingly sharp, very fast and it's weather sealed, but it does not have stabilization. The 55-200 is highly versatile with powerful OIS stabilization, and a longer focal length zoom range. And it's less expensive. For general use, the 55-200 is a pretty sweet lens. I've handheld this lens down to 1/25 sec and gotten sharp images. You can see some examples of how I use the 55-200 lens here in my review post: danbaileyphoto.com/blog/falling-back-in-love-with-the-fujifilm-xf-50-200mm/ Hope that helps.
@@DanBaileyPhoto thank you for ur advice, I appreciate that. I just made decision to buy 55-200, u have same observation as I had. Yesterday i had few situation where 55-200 been usefull more than 90mm. Thx for respond. Take care
Awesome. I think you'll really enjoy the 55-200, it's a very versatile lens. Some of my favorite landscapes were shot with that lens. Have lots of fun with it!
Ben, those two lenses are very close in sharpness and image quality. The 90 has a slightly different (quad linear) focusing motor, maybe a bit faster, and it's a bit smaller, but the 80mm is more versatile. It can be used with the Fuji Teleconverters and it obviously has full macro capabilities. I've been highly impressed by both of these lenses.
I really love the image quality of the 90mm f2 but think of selling it because of the focal length. I barely use it because it is not as versatile as my 35mm f2 or 16mm f1,4. I bought this lens for nature and portrait. Do you think I need to think a second time about selling this lens?
For the most part, focal length is personal preference, there's really no right answer to that question. There are some looks that will really inspire you and drive the creativity you want with your imagery, and you'll find that certain looks will appeal to your style more than others. I always recommend having at least one fast telephoto lens, because that kind of lens can really come in handy for shooting certain styles and isolating subject matter from your background with nice, shallow focus. However, I agree that the 35 f/2 is extremely versatile, and you can achieve similar effects by simply moving in closer. The 90 is a fantastic lens, but if you find that you don't use it very often, then perhaps selling it and paring you kit down would offer you a sense of simplicity, and as I said, you can still get some nice, shallow DOF effects with the 35. Hope that helps.
Thanks for your comment, and I apologize for the audio issue. I learned, after shooting some of my earlier videos, that many lavalier mics are configured with a TRRS plug, which doesn't give true stereo sound when plugged into a digital camera. The solution was to convert all the audio to Dual Mono. Eventually, I got a TRRS adapter for my mic, but unfortunately, some of those older videos have the single-side audio issue. At any rate, I hope you still found this video helpful. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@Dan Bailey, mostly street portraits. XT4 with 90f2 might be big setup but its longer focal length made my shots easier to compose from a distance without getting noticed.
I've always thought of lenses like the 90 as the classic "across the street" lens. It definitely allows you to capture subjects from a comfortable and sometimes more inconspicuous vantage point.
Hi Dan, thanks you for this video I just have several questions if you don't mind. First, when you took a shot with this lens at 1/20th of a second, does the camera have an IBIS? Second, do you also have the 56 1.2? I have the 56, and I think it will be redundant to have this. And third, I'm choosing between this lens, or the 55-200mm lens for portraiture. I don't know if you have the 55-200mm, if you do, how's the sharpness between the 2 lens? Thanks again.
Edwin, thanks for your feedback. To answer your questions, no, I don’t have IBIS on my camera. Shooting those kinds of relativity slow shutter speeds requires the right subject and a steady hand. Actually, when shooting with low speeds, I’ll often brace the camera by pulling the strap right against my neck. 2. Yes, I do have the 56. Also and incredible lens, but I wouldn’t necessarily say that it’s redundant. The longer focal length of the 90 can give you a much different look, especially at medium distances. And the AF is WAY faster as well. They each have their strengths. But can compliment each other. 3. I do own the 55-200. It’s a good lens, and I enjoy using it, but hands down, the 90 is far superior. It’s noticeably sharper, especially once you start to shoot further away, it’s let’s in quite a bit more light and has WAY faster AF. The only thing the 55-200 has over the 90 is that it’s stabilized, but overall, it’s just not in the same class as the 90. And with the current rebates, the 90 is only $100 more, instead of $250 more, as it normally is.
Hi Mr. Dan Could you talk about whats the best lenses for a dsr and mirroless camara for cinematic look. Id like to make a short film and just have the 15_45mm fujifilm lense . Could you recomende me a nice lense no to expensive for vídeo please, thanks so much ! I m you fan ... (I have the tx30)
Marcelo, that's a tricky question, simply because there are so many different styles of cinema. Trying to nail it down to a single "look" is tough. However, there are a couple of looks that could be defined as having a cinematic quality. Shooting slightly wide angle to normal, around 28mm-35mm on your Fuji, and shooting telephoto with a shallow depth of field. With your 15-45mm, you already have the wide to normal range covered, so you could achieve a cinematic look with your existing gear, it would just take studying camera angles and focal length that some of your favorite directors use and practicing. Having a slightly faster lens like the 35mm f/2 can give you a very nice look with a more shallow depth of field, and having a longer lens would definitely give you more options for isolating your subject matter against. shallow, compressed background. Fuji's 50-230 is an inexpensive zoom that would give you that nice long lens look. If you wanted to spend a little more, then you might consider the 90mm f/2, or Fuji's 16-80mm f/4. Hope that helps. What style of video are you interested in shooting?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Thanks so much for your recomendations, Id like to make a short film drama actually it will be my first one. For now im doing music videos ( to practice and for fun)
That’s a good way to practice! I actually shot my first music video earlier this year, entirely with the 35mm f/2: “Dr. Fauci Say" Music Video ruclips.net/video/aa_X2zjxOnw/видео.html
Thanks for the comment. While it's true that more blades made for smoother circles of confusion, the bokeh on the 90 has a pretty cool style. I like the way it looks. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I have an X-Pro3 and I shoot street, travel, and portraits. I've checked the 80mm f2.8 Macro and the new 50mm f1.0, but I'm not a fan of their lemon shaped bokeh balls at their widest aperture. I like the 56mm f1.2, but it's not WR. I guess I'll stick with my 50mm f2 for now.
That 50 f/2 is a pretty awesome lens, especially for the price, size, weight and the fact that it’s weather sealed. 👍 Why I Love This Lens - FUJIFILM XF50mm f/2 WR ruclips.net/video/48r4YuADH50/видео.html
I haven't actually used the 56mm APD version, but I do have the original 56mm f/1.2. It does have incredibly optics, but I do like the slightly longer focal length of the 90mm, and it has a much faster AF motor than the 56. They're both great lenses, though, and highly capable tools for different uses. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to shoot?
Thanks for your comment. You're right. First mention of the 90 is at 1:40, but I wanted to give some background about my style and history, which is a large part of why I love this lens... just like the title says. Are you a Fuji shooter?
Hey Daniel, you're not wrong. 🤣 I get pretty excited when talking about cameras and stuff. I do try to keep myself under control, but it doesn't always work. I'm much more diligent on some videos, while others are basically a runaway train of energy. In fact, one time in college, someone said to me, "you have much more energy than you need." Thirty years later, nothing has changed. BTW, What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
![MISSING: SLIM SHADY [Expanded Mourner’s Edition Trailer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xh8qgHrOO1g/mqdefault.jpg)
I've owned this lens for four years and I agree with everything you said, Dan. I think it's the sharpest lens I've ever used! I only need to use it more often.
Thanks for the comment, Terry. Same. I’ll admit that I occasionally go through periods when I don’t shoot with it, but as soon as I pick it up again, the love is instantly rekindled. ❤️
The 90 was the second lens I bought three years ago when I started shooting Fuji. I agree with everything you spoke about, it's a great lens.
Randy, thanks for the comment. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
Thank you Dan. I couldn't agree more with everything you said about the 90mm f2, the best lens on the planet.hahah. A friend of friend used to get really annoyed when I said that to him. Joke apart I purchased the 90mm after owning the 50-140 and because of the wieght and bulk I'd rather choose to shoot with the 90mm over the 50-140mm and the 90mm is ideal for portrait.As you said I can carry it all day without any complain and it nail the subject with a crisp razor sharp every single time. I carry the 16mm, the 56, the 35f2 and the 90 mm on my engagement shoot. I usaually end up using the 35 and the 90 mm for the most part of my shots. Take care.
Nas, that’s such a versatile combination. And it’s totally the best lens on the planet! 😀 In this video, I show two jumping mountain bike shots. During that shoot, I was trying to nail them with the 50-140, but was having trouble getting a good AF lock in just the right moment. I went ahead and switched to the 90 and ended up nailing both shots on the very next try. The 50-140 is a great action lens, but I do think the 90 has the edge with regards to AF speed.
Also, you had contacted me recently with an X-T4 issue. Did I answer you, and did you get the problem sorted out?
Thank you Dan, you did answer me and it helped resolve the issue. However I have another issue with the Xt4 and I even went to store to see if they can set something different in the menu to fix but the salesperson said that’s the way the Xt4 is. I owned the xt3 as well and I am wedding photographer. I don’t see that delay that is long like the Xt4 when the camera goes to sleep. The xt3 respond a lot quicker than the Xt4. Lately I”be been using the Xt4 mainly but having to wait a little longer than the Xt3 is annoying . The lcd screen stayed black too long before I can see the subject. Any idea how to fix that issue. Thanks Dan.
Nas, I’m not sure you can fix that. I haven’t used the X-T4, but my guess is that it performs this way to maximize battery life. The X-T3 has a quicker screen-dimming than the X-T2, because it’s faster processor needs to exact even more power from the same battery. One possible solution is to put the camera into High Performance mode and see if that makes a difference.
@@nasroullahdinally5140 A couple things it might be. If slow to turn off/on, could be "sensor cleaning" and you can turn that off if its an issue as it doesn't really do much. If its slow after taking a shot, it could be the clarity setting, which makes it really slow if its set to anything other than 0.
No dought it's my sharpest and most versatile lens. It also makes a great indoor sports lens. It always has a place in my bag.
It’s all of those things, Mark, and so carry-able, isn’t it? 😀
I love this lens. I think zooms are where it's at for landscape photography, given you cannot always zoom with your feet, such as when you're standing at the edge of a cliff ... you could zoom with your feet to an untimely death. Still, I echo your sentiments about primes. The constraints of a single FL can make one a better, more resourceful photographer. I especially love the challenges of shooting with a long prime like the 90. It's a matter of deciding what elements to distill. It's awfully fun and the image quality is, of course, top notch.
Daniel, good points. One wouldn't want to zoom towards an untimely death! 😱 I do like the flexibility of zooms for shooting landscapes and other subject matter, especially things like sports and action,, but I also love the simplicity of primes as well. I use both quite often in my photography.
Yeah, I love the angle of view provided by a 135mm lens. It was the first lens I bought for my brand new Minolta SR-T-303 in 1974 (it came with a 50mm 1.7), and you're right: you get used to what a prime will do, so you can pretty much frame without even raising the camera. However, I only just moved from a Nikon D750 to a Fujifimn X-T30 almost exactly a year ago; it came with an 18-55mm lens, and I bought the 55-200 and the 10-24, not to mention miscellaneous other accessories. It's time, I think, to take a break for a while. Still, that 90mm looks awfully good...
Hi Daniel. I never got to use the old 135 f/2 back when I was a Nikon shooter, but I'm certainly enjoying my life with the 90!!
Thank you very much. I have using 56mm 1.2 for years. Now i am going to buy a XT4 and thinking to try this 90mm but havent made my mind. Thanks for the information!👍🌹
Thanks Cecelia. I'm glad you found this helpful. Let me know if you have any more questions. The 90 is really an amazing lens, and I don't think you'd be disappointed. 👍
Absolutely 100% agree with everything in this video Dan. I did my first wedding shoot with the 90mm on my X-H1 at the weekend and it was an absolute joy to use. Tack sharp and never missed focus once (other than operator error!) To think I was previously lugging around my 6d mk ii and 70-200 f2.8 is just madness. I had it paired with the 35mm f2 on my X-T30 which was also fantastic. The one thing I took away is I think a 16mm or 23mm f1.4 would be the ideal accompaniment to the 90mm.
Gareth, it's an entirely different world shooting with the 90mm on an X Series body compared to a 70-200 2.8 on a big DSLR, and it's not like you're sacrificing quality. The 90 is amazing, and it does have extremely quick AF, even faster than the autofocus on the 50-140. And I would agree, the 23mm f/1.4 is also an incredible, razor sharp lens that would pair extremely well with the 90. Those two lenses would make an excellent combination for shooting things like weddings and portraits.
You got my attention when you mentioned how light weight the lens is! I did not know about this lens. Love the view & sharpness. Thanks for the lesson. I will be getting one.
GeorgeAnna, I think you’ll really enjoy the 90. It really is an amazing lens, and it’s no bigger than most kit zooms, but with much sharper, faster glass. Definitely one of the gems in the X Series system. 👍
Got the lens! In fact, it came early! Took it into my backyard; for a test run;. Wow, you were right! This is a sharp lens! What a difference it makes.. Hope to take it on a more fun shoot soon (lots of fire & smoky air in the region right now).
Thanks Dan. I have this Lens in my bag. It’s a beautiful optics. I really appreciated your enthusiasm for it because it’s a perfect lens for many situations. I shoot events and portraits and this Lens is a beast in these situations. Thanks Mike aka Fuji Warrior. 👍🏽
Hi Michael, thanks for the comment. The 90 is definitely one of the real gems in the system, although given the increasing number of lenses in their line, I can imagine that it's one that gets overlooked by people. It really is amazing for shooting a wide variety of scenes. 👍
You Inspired me to take this beauty for a spin tomorrow Dan. I will document my neighbourhood and share in my website. www.fujiwarrior.com
Cool! I’ll be sure and check it out, Michael!
I've had the 90 in my bag rarely pulled it out. But now after your review on it. I see 👀 it in a new perspective. I always reached for the 56mm or 16mm. I will purposely use the 90mm only for awhile. New perspectives rather than old habits
Navalee, yes the 90 is an amazing lens. And that's a good way of looking at it. Breaking away from old habits is a good way to foster new creative possibilities.
I can't wait to get this. I had a Canon 100mm 2.8 II Macro and it was pretty good but not even close enough to what i would like. I use the Canon TS-E lenses the most and they are insanely sharp. I'm using the Xt-3 more and more now and the 90mm 2.0 is my best hope for great portraits
You're going to love the 90, it's ridiculously sharp, and definitely a great lens for portraits and isolating razor sharp subjects against a soft background. 👍
Helpful video Dan. I’m not too long into Fuji (X-T1) and have already purchased the 35 f2 and 16 f1.4 (both WR). I’ve kept my Canon 40D and own a long range Tamron 18 - 270 which is outstanding for general street photography (in good light!), so although I’m tempted to acquire a WR rated telephoto lens for the Fuji, I may get try and get by with the Canon / Tamron for now and look out for a 90 f2 for my X-T1
Thanks for your comment. The 90 would be an excellent choice for a mid range telephoto on the X-T1. You'll find the quality to be excellent and the size/weight. make it very portable. Along with your 35 and 16 lenses, you'd have an excellent and very compact Fuji kit what would give you the wide/middle/long range view angles.
Whenever I'm putting together a lens combination for heading out, whether it's for a short excursion or an extended shoot, this is how I always think: Wide, Middle, Long. This lets you cover all your bases without unnecessary duplication in your kit and overloading your camera bag. How are you liking the X-T1 so far?
90mm f2 is fujifilms 2nd sharpest lens after the 80mm macro! i have both and use them extensively, great videos Dan!!
Indeed! I haven't shot much with the 80, but I know it's an amazing lens as well. Thanks for the comment. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto i shoot a variety of subjects from macro,landscapes and food photography to portraits! as i have nearly every fuji lens i shoot most genre's! i love your reviews Dan.
Thanks so much for your feedback! I'm glad you're enjoying my channel. Keep up the good work and have tons of fun with your Fuji gear!
Really want this lens! I have low light sports events and maybe weddings coming up this year and I'd love to use/own this. The 50-140 will probably be the sensible option, but I'd prefer to only rent that lens. There are 90 F2 lenses available second hand for under $500 and it's so tempting.
The 90mm is definitely a great lens for shooting low light and inside events. The wide f/2 aperture and quad liner AF motor make it a very fast performer. And $500 is a really good price, 1/3 of what a brand new 50-140 costs!!
@@DanBaileyPhoto yeah I'd prefer the 90 to the 50-140 and I think I will own it sometime this year, but we'll see.
Both are great and both have their advantages. Overall, I think you'll find that the 90 has slightly quicker AF. Start saving your pennies!!
You're very clear headed. I only have the 16-50 3.5, which has it's moments...and the now the 23mm 2.0. That baby.... So seeing this, looks like I'll be back to burritos made of wood chips and dreams for a while...
Haha!! That sounds like a good plan! 🤣
Great video/tutorial as usual Dan. When I started watching the video I said to myself, no, I don't need this lens, for portraits I like the XF-50 f/2 and for every day carry I bring along the XF 16-80 and the XF 55-200, but after watching the video in its entirety you made me think about adding it to my collection, (you’re a great salesman, LOL) I don't do any professional work, so I can wait for a Fujifilm special. Stay safe.
Enrique, thanks for the comment. It really is a great lens, and even though you can get similar results from others lenses, there’s something really special about the 90. And it’s actually on sale right now with a $150 rebate.
Very thorough review! I just received the 90mm as a gift so I’m eager to test it out in landscapes and street photography. You sharing your experiences are extremely helpful and inspiring.
Thanks for the comment, Charles. That's a very nice gift, indeed! You'll have a lot of fun with the 90mm lens. I hope my video inspires you to shoot some great photos with it!
Just ordered and waiting for it to come to my doorstep
Awesome!!! Maybe by the time you read this reply, you'll already have it in your hands, Andy! What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I got it.
I fell in love with the 135mm full frame with my canon 5d mk4. This didn’t disappoint.
I’m using an xh2 since it’s got ibis and I really haven’t had any desire past the xtrans3 sensor.
I am a concert photographer in the music scene so I use it for concerts or portraits for press kits.
Awesome! I hope you get a lot of use out of it!
Absolutely wonderful pictures! This is an example of excellence . Congratulations.
Jose, thank you so much or your feedback. Really appreciate your comment.
A very nice review Dan. Your example photos are amazing as always.
Thanks, Daren. Appreciate the comment. 👍
Even though it's very sharp the images never look clinical. Nice to see the variety of photos shot with this lens.
Ryan, that's an interesting, but I'd say very accurate way to describe images shot with the 90. There is something special about that lens that creates wonderful photos. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot with it?
Need to look into this lens after watching your review. I have the 50 to 140 and love it. But this lens is lighter and from watching the video seems like it could be a good walking around lens especially in low light.
Al, the 90 does make a great companion lens to the 50-140 for those times when you want to go with a lighter, more compact kit.
Thanks Mr for your help. I don´t have this lens but now I will. I am from Brazil and will follown from now on. I will buy your book.
Paulo, thanks for your comment. I think you will not be disappointed!! What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Well Dan, I am new in this art. I bought a Xt3 with a kit len 18-55 mm f2.8 LM OIS. But I am not sure about the lens, but I would like to buy on prime len. I have a store where I sell food products . I want to take pictures and put the pictures in Instagram to promote my store. So, my question is : What lens do you suggest considering that I already have a 18-55 mm. I like to take beautiful photos in streets and fields like farms, animals, so I thought about this 90 mm. What do you recommend? or do you think that my idea to keep my 18-55 mm and buy 90 mm is best choise. Or will you suggest one 33 mmF1.4 R LM WR or 24 mm f1.4 R LM WR. Thanks for your help . I realy apreciate. You are very nice.
Thanks again Dan for this detailed critic and advise. The 90mm f2 is missing in my photo bag but perhaps not for long...
Thanks, Pierre. It really is a great lens, I think you'd enjoy using it. How is your black and white photography lately? Do you still prefer shooting in Velvia and converting to BW in LR, over shooting straight ACROS?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Hi Dan. I have just ordered the 90 mm f2. To answer your question I finally differentiate the way I shoot according to the camera I use. With my Xpro2 I shoot in Acros directly. With my X-T and X70 I still shoot in Velvia and then, according to the specific view, convert in Black and white with Lihgt room or Silver Efex Pro2. In addition I came back to the old way I used in the past in argentic process using a Canon A1. My problem now is to find time and subjects and choose the right hardware...Hope to hear or read you soon. Regards, Pierre
I just bought it on sale for $799 on Amazon and it arrived today-I love this lens! I’m sure you will, too.
Love your review, Dan. Thank you!
Dan - Thanks for the video and possibly taking some money out of my pocket. I have many of the Fuji zooms but no primes. I do have the 50-140 and my cameras are the X-T2 & 3. Find myself not using the 50-140 much and mainly shoot landscapes and wildlife. The 90mm sounds interesting but need to see how it would fit into what I shoot. My other lenses are the 10-24, 18-55, and 55-200.
Steve, thanks for your comment. Yes, the 90 is very good lens, but it's expensive enough to take some time and consider how it would fit into your style. That said, I've always felt that every photographer should have at least one fast prime, and in my opinion, a normal or short telephoto prime gives you the most benefits of having that wide aperture.
Great review! I'd love to see you do something to help those of us having a hard time choosing a telephoto (for landscape mostly) on the fuji system. I got a 50-230 for my first and it's fine for the price but I'd like to upgrade at some point!
Timothé, Fuji has quite a few good telephoto lenses in their line. Obviously, the 90mm is an incredible lens, and I've already shown you what you can do with it in this video. I actually like the 55-200 for shooting landscapes, it gives you good versatility, a longer focal length and excellent stabilization, and it's not too expensive. The 18-135 is another good one, also stabilized, and gives you a wider range of focal lengths. And I love the 100-400mm for isolating distant subject matter. It's considerably bigger and heavier and it costs a little bit more, but the 100-400 is an incredible lens. I'll probably do a video about that one soon. 😀 Hope that helps.
I was convinced I was gonna buy the Viltrox 85 (4340 new on ebay), but I just can't pull the trigger.. better to save a couple more months and get the 90.. I love to save money and will often take the cheaper route, but in this case I don't want to settle for anything less then the absolute best.. I always shot the 135 f2L when I had my canon set up, so the 90 has a lot to live up to
Hey, thanks for the comment. Yes, sometimes it's definitely worth spending the extra money. If you have experience shooting with the old 135 f/2 lenses, then you know exactly what the benefit will be to save up and treat yourself with the 90. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
I live in a small coastal town in the Dominican Republic.. I shoot anything from real estate to beauty pageants and of course a lot of sessions on the amazing beaches nearby.. Earning potential here is very limited so I try to keep costs down.. I shoot X-T2 (T1 back up).. I'm pretty simple, I can shoot just about everything with the xf 35 f2 (love it).. when I need wider I have the 18 f2 ($200) .. (for real estate an adapted Canon 10-18 ($150)).. I spent a lot to get the 56 as my 'Wow' lens .. but it has been, at times, disappointing.. the focusing accuracy, on the T2 at least, makes the lens not as reliable and enjoyable as I need it to be.. When I shot Canon I bought, hated and sold the 85 1.8.. but when I got the 135 it was love at first shot and served me well for many years.. .. I'm a 'family guy' wife, 2 kids, vehicle payments etc.. so the $400 I saved for the Viltrox has already meant sacrifice.. another $400 for a used Fuji means I have to lie to the wife hahahaha.. I love my Fujis, I won't be changing systems in the foreseeable future, so $400 spread out over a couple of years for my main lens, isn't really very much.. I'm sure my clients would be more than happy with the images from the Viltrox, as they have been with the 56, but for me, for my own personal enjoyment and satisfaction.. I need to have the 90 .. plus my birthday (53) is on Monday, so that gives me a legitimate excuse, doesn't it?
That's a really good way to look at it. Good equipment is an investment, and over time the cost will amortize, and it will likely pay for itself, since it sounds like you have clients who will be very happy with the images you shoot with that lens. 👍
Thanks for sharing how you use this lens. Do you ever use the 16mm lens? If so, in what situation? Also curious if you compared the 90mm to the 80mm macro.
Ric, I have shot with the 16 f/2.8 a few times, and I think it’s a great lens that compliments the other small primes nicely. My main wide angle has been the 14 f/2.8. That was one of my first Fuji lenses, and I like the extra width. I like that the 16 I a little smaller, though.
I prefer the 90 over the 80, mostly because it’s smaller and lighter. The 80 a fantastic lens, nearly identical to the 90 in quality but it’s quite a bit bigger and heavier, mostly due to the addition of the stabilization elements.
8:47 Totally agree. I only use prime lenses.
Thanks for your comment. What are your favorite Fuji primes?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I have the 16mm 1.4, 23 1.4, and 56. Naturally, the 90 is next.
Cool. I have the 23, 56 and 90, but I don't have the 16 f/1.4. How do you like that one?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I absolutely love the 16 1.4. If I can only live with one, that is the one.
I've heard really good things about that lens. One of the Fujifilm tech reps has told me that the 16 1.4 is his favorite lens as well. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
Beautiful review-just subscribed. Keep it up!
Thanks for the comment and for subscribing! What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Hello, Dan. Thanks, again, for the review! I dove into Fuji with the XT4 and always try to pack the 16mm (1.4), 100-400mm, and the kit lens wherever I go. The 90mm just arrived yesterday.
Being around (and photographing/recording) wildlife makes me happy like few other things can.
Ever since I have picked up this lens, I wonder why Fuji has not designed all other primes this way.
Yes, the 90 really is a special lens. I would imaging that exact design of any lens is dictated largely by its size and physical characteristics. I wonder if they'll use the Quad Linear AF motor in more of their designs in the future.
Looking to keep my kit small and simple - I was looking for a telephoto for sports. It's good to see that you also shoot cycling! I like to shoot crits, and races at the velodrome (indoors). I want a lens that's able to do well in lower light at the track but also affordable and light. I currently use a Tamron 70-180 on Sony and thats around 800g. The fuji is heavier, and twice the price of the 90mm f2... I wanted to know your opinion about whether the 90mm would be a good alternative for the 50-140. I know you said it would be more of an addition than a replacement for your purposes, but I only use telephoto for sports. Otherwise I want to use an 18/35 combo. (trying my best to not be tempted into getting hte 16-55)
Thanks for your comment. Yes, I do think the 90 is a good altneriative to the 50-140. Not only is the 90 quite a bit smaller and lighter, it also has very vast AF. I've been in situations when the 90 actually outperformed the 50-140 with regard to autofocus, so yes, it's an excellent optic and there's no reason you couldn't use it as a dedicated action lens.
@@DanBaileyPhoto Thanks for the reply! Going to rent a 90mm for the weekend to see what its like. Double header cx weekend for us here :)
Thank you.
You're welcome! I'm glad you found this helpful, Steve. Are you current a Fuji shooter?
Not currently but I am very interested in the fuji system. Been a fan since the film days.
Cool. Let me know if you have any questions about the system.
Lots of great points in the video.
Is it too crazy to use it for cinematic filming? How is the focus, both, manually and auto?
Thanks for your comment! The 90mm has a really nice, smooth focus ring, so I think would be very usable for cinematic filming. I don't know if I've shot much video with it, but I know I've shot some. It's just an awesome lens all around. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto thanks!! I shot random video. Also shot a short film and want to do more
Cool. I've been finding myself shooting more shot videos lately. It's a lot of fun!
Good stuff ... you sold me. Is it comfortable with the X-E3? Years ago I had a MF Pentax 120/2.8 which I loved and miss.... this should be my Fuji answer
Thanks, Martin. Yes, it should feel just fine on the X-E3. I’ve used it many times on my X-10, and it doesn’t feel too big on the smaller body.
This is a great review. I’ve owned the 90, but sold it because my 56 saw so much more use. That said, I’m going on a backpacking trip soon and am thinking of buying it again and traveling with the 14, the 27, and the 90. Is that crazy? I’ve also been contemplating just an 18 and 56. So many choices!
Hi Joshua. No, that’s not crazy, it sounds like just the kind of lightweight prime lens kit I’d take on a backcountry trip myself. That’s a fantastic combination and would give you wide, middle and long focal lengths, in a high quality and compact setup. If you have the space, that would by my choice over the 18 and 56, because the 90 will give you more soft background telephoto options at medium and longer distances. Where are you going on your backpacking trip?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Thanks, Dan, that's really helpful! We'll be in the Sierras for about five days. I'm trying to keep things lightweight. I also have a 16-80, so that's a possibility, too. It would certainly be nice to travel with one camera, one lens; on the other hand, the three primes would keep less weight on the camera at any given time, and I'm guessing the image quality would be higher. Do you tend to backpack with zooms or primes?
Hi Dan have you had a chance to try the new XF70-300 yet?
I’m considering this or the XF90.
The versatility of the XF90 is great, (for portraits) just don’t know if the reach is enough compression for shooting landscapes with this.
I have the 16/1.4 and 35/2 with X-T1.
Thanks!
Shidan, I have not tried the 70-300 yet. The 90 is an awesome lens, but if you like to shoot longer telephoto landscapes and use strong compression in your images, that 70-300 would be an excellent choice. Granted, it's not as fast as the 90, but it does have OIS stabilization, which the 90 does not have.
Dan. What’s your processing preference ? Lightroom? Capture One? Iridident X-Transformer?
I’ve used all three of those programs, and I think they all have pros and cons. I’ve used Lightroom for years, and it’s pretty comprehensive, so it’s hard to move away from that program. Capture One does an exceptional job with color and RAW rendering, especially with the Fuji colors. I also like the simplicity of Luminar, compared to the complexity of Capture One.
I also think that Brian has done an impressive job with Iridient Developer. I used it for awhile a few years ago.
However, as much as I like and tried to incorporate all of these programs in to some form of my workflow, I realized that I was complicating my digital photography life. Add in the fact that I absolutely love the Fuji Jpegs straight out of camera, these days I’ve embraced the notion of shooting Jpeg as often as possible. I still use Lightroom for my main catalog, and use Luminar for much of my occasional processing.
Again, though, I spend most of my energy trying to nail it in the moment and being really happy with the Fuji Jpegs. When I need/want to process, I usually use Luminar.
Hope that helps. I know I gave you a long winded answer, but I’m a huge proponent of embracing the capabilities of today’s cameras and spending less time sitting at my computer editing images, as I outline in this video:
Shooting For The Moment: Why You Should Embrace The Fuji JPEGS ruclips.net/video/BCEUaHLuoEM/видео.html
Great and informative video, thanks
Thanks, Christian. Glad you enjoyed this. Do you have the 90? What kinds of subjects so you like too shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto currently trying to decide between the 90mm and the viltrox 85. I got all the other f2 primes, wanna complete my collection.
I'm not too familiar with the Viltrox, but from what I have seen, it's a decent lens. I don't think it will match the sharpness of Fuji's 90mm, but it does get the job done at a considerably lower price. The 90 is really hard to beat, so I guess it comes down to whether you want to pay for that quality. In the long run, if you truly love a lens, the extra few hundred dollars usually end up being pretty negligible, and would probably end up being spent on something dumb, like bills, gas, or expensive coffee. 😆 Given that you have all of the other f/2 primes, then my advice would be to go for the 90.
@@DanBaileyPhoto thank you, that helps my decision making :)
Great video and great lens, but watching the video on headphones the right ear gets all the sound and the left ear only gets some noise!
Federico, thanks for your comment. Yes, I did have some audio balance issues with my earlier videos, but I’ve since fixed that problem. I apologize for the inconvenience. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
Which Fuji cameras are you using now Dan? I use the 90mm on my H1, because it has IBIS. I'm not interested in the T4 because of that terrible screen. Do you find the image quality of the X-H1 comparable with the later models like the T3 and T4. Thanks Dan!
Philip, I'm currently using the X-T3. The X-H1 has the same sensor and processor as the X-T2, which I always found to give amazing image quality. The back side illuminated sensor has a few more pixels and slightly better low light sensitivity, and the updated processor give it slightly better color rendition.
In real world terms, I'd say the X-T2/X-H1 image quality can absolutely hold up to the newer models. Photos from those camera still look incredible. When I browse through my favorite images that I shot with my X-T2, X-T1 and even the X20, I'm still impressed and am still in love with the colors and the overall look of the images, as much as I am with my recent X-T3 images.
Our modern technology world makes it so that all the camera companies have to chase each other every year, and that means they continually upgrade models on a regular basis. However, Fujifilm builds the X Series so that each model has lasting legacy and can give you years of enjoyment and great performance. So yes, the X-H1 still produces wonderful looking images. Bottom line, if you're happy with the images you're making, then there's never a need to rush out and get the latest camera.
@@DanBaileyPhoto wow, great advice thanks so much Dan
You’re welcome! 👍
How much coffee did you have before you shot this video? =] I love your review!
Coffee...? Who needs coffee? I'm my own coffee. 🤣 Thanks for your comment, I'm glad you liked this review. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I use X-Pro3 and with it I mainly use the Touit 32mm, 56mm, and the 50-140. I take photos of my travel around Korea and Japan--and most of the photos are street snaps and landscapes. Again, this was a good review--both informative and entertaining!
Dan your e-guide for Fujifilm X-series cameras, have you updated it for the Fuji XT4?
Edwin, yes. My X Series guide has been update with full coverage of the X-T4 and X-S10. Have you already purchased the guide?
@@DanBaileyPhoto not yet, but I do plan to get one. I just upgraded to XT4 and this time it will be for the long haul. Thanks.
Cool. I think you'll really like the X-T4, it's an amazingly powerful camera. Have fun with it. My guide will definitely help you get acquainted with what it can do. Is this your first Fuji?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I upgraded from the XT30. Thanks for the info. I'm browsing through your guide now.
Awesome. I hope you find it to be a helpful resource!
And it’s currently on sale!!!
Yes it it!!! 😀
Well it will be here later this week. 🤪
Wheeeeeee!!!! 😀👍 What’s the first thing you’re going to shoot with it?
Actually my plan is to pair it with 16mm f1.4 and my x-t3 and do some hiking. I prefer primes and I really looking to keep my kit light and simple and may sideline my 80mm (don’t really do much true macro) and 50-140mm f2.8. I have some weight restrictions due to back and neck issues and these two fabulous primes should suit my needs nicely.
Michael, do you already have the 16 f/1.4? If not, and you want to go lightweight, you might consider the 14mm f/2.8. It's quite a bit lighter than the 16mm f/1.4. Or even the newer 16 f/2.8. That 14mm is an amazing lens, though, it's been my go-to wide angle Fuji lens for years. Super sharp, close focus and considerably lighter than the 16. The 16 f/2.8 is even smaller and lighter. For a hiking kit, I wold consider one of those two over the 16 f/1.4, especially if you're concerned about saving weight.
guys I need ADVICE (Please) I am struggling with decision what I should buy 50-200 or 90mm, I take mostly Landscapes pic, Architecture, my shots call them postcards coz I love that kind photography. 50-200 on plus is that u can change distance and have IS but minus it is not so that sharp as 90mm and is NOT WR, 90mm is dem sharp and is WR.
Guys some advice examples? Thx for you advice.
Marcin, both are great lenses, and each have their strengths. Yes, the 90 is amazingly sharp, very fast and it's weather sealed, but it does not have stabilization. The 55-200 is highly versatile with powerful OIS stabilization, and a longer focal length zoom range. And it's less expensive. For general use, the 55-200 is a pretty sweet lens. I've handheld this lens down to 1/25 sec and gotten sharp images.
You can see some examples of how I use the 55-200 lens here in my review post:
danbaileyphoto.com/blog/falling-back-in-love-with-the-fujifilm-xf-50-200mm/
Hope that helps.
@@DanBaileyPhoto thank you for ur advice, I appreciate that. I just made decision to buy 55-200, u have same observation as I had. Yesterday i had few situation where 55-200 been usefull more than 90mm. Thx for respond. Take care
Awesome. I think you'll really enjoy the 55-200, it's a very versatile lens. Some of my favorite landscapes were shot with that lens. Have lots of fun with it!
Hiw does the 90 compare with the 80 macro?
Ben, those two lenses are very close in sharpness and image quality. The 90 has a slightly different (quad linear) focusing motor, maybe a bit faster, and it's a bit smaller, but the 80mm is more versatile. It can be used with the Fuji Teleconverters and it obviously has full macro capabilities. I've been highly impressed by both of these lenses.
I really love the image quality of the 90mm f2 but think of selling it because of the focal length. I barely use it because it is not as versatile as my 35mm f2 or 16mm f1,4.
I bought this lens for nature and portrait.
Do you think I need to think a second time about selling this lens?
For the most part, focal length is personal preference, there's really no right answer to that question. There are some looks that will really inspire you and drive the creativity you want with your imagery, and you'll find that certain looks will appeal to your style more than others. I always recommend having at least one fast telephoto lens, because that kind of lens can really come in handy for shooting certain styles and isolating subject matter from your background with nice, shallow focus.
However, I agree that the 35 f/2 is extremely versatile, and you can achieve similar effects by simply moving in closer. The 90 is a fantastic lens, but if you find that you don't use it very often, then perhaps selling it and paring you kit down would offer you a sense of simplicity, and as I said, you can still get some nice, shallow DOF effects with the 35. Hope that helps.
idk why, but the sound in my earphone only work well in right side
Thanks for your comment, and I apologize for the audio issue. I learned, after shooting some of my earlier videos, that many lavalier mics are configured with a TRRS plug, which doesn't give true stereo sound when plugged into a digital camera. The solution was to convert all the audio to Dual Mono. Eventually, I got a TRRS adapter for my mic, but unfortunately, some of those older videos have the single-side audio issue.
At any rate, I hope you still found this video helpful. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
It never left my XT4.
I’ll bet it pairs extremely well with the X-T4. What kind if subjects do you like to shoot?
@Dan Bailey, mostly street portraits. XT4 with 90f2 might be big setup but its longer focal length made my shots easier to compose from a distance without getting noticed.
I've always thought of lenses like the 90 as the classic "across the street" lens. It definitely allows you to capture subjects from a comfortable and sometimes more inconspicuous vantage point.
Hi Dan, thanks you for this video I just have several questions if you don't mind. First, when you took a shot with this lens at 1/20th of a second, does the camera have an IBIS? Second, do you also have the 56 1.2? I have the 56, and I think it will be redundant to have this. And third, I'm choosing between this lens, or the 55-200mm lens for portraiture. I don't know if you have the 55-200mm, if you do, how's the sharpness between the 2 lens? Thanks again.
Edwin, thanks for your feedback. To answer your questions, no, I don’t have IBIS on my camera. Shooting those kinds of relativity slow shutter speeds requires the right subject and a steady hand. Actually, when shooting with low speeds, I’ll often brace the camera by pulling the strap right against my neck.
2. Yes, I do have the 56. Also and incredible lens, but I wouldn’t necessarily say that it’s redundant. The longer focal length of the 90 can give you a much different look, especially at medium distances. And the AF is WAY faster as well. They each have their strengths. But can compliment each other.
3. I do own the 55-200. It’s a good lens, and I enjoy using it, but hands down, the 90 is far superior. It’s noticeably sharper, especially once you start to shoot further away, it’s let’s in quite a bit more light and has WAY faster AF. The only thing the 55-200 has over the 90 is that it’s stabilized, but overall, it’s just not in the same class as the 90. And with the current rebates, the 90 is only $100 more, instead of $250 more, as it normally is.
@@DanBaileyPhoto thanks for the lenghy and informative reply. Thanks for taking time as well.
My pleasure. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I got the xt30. Travel photography and a recent convert to portraiture. That's the reason for my interest with the 90mm
Cool. The X-T30 is a great little camera. I think it's one of the best cameras for the money. Have fun with it!
Hi Mr. Dan Could you talk about whats the best lenses for a dsr and mirroless camara for cinematic look. Id like to make a short film and just have the 15_45mm fujifilm lense . Could you recomende me a nice lense no to expensive for vídeo please, thanks so much ! I m you fan ... (I have the tx30)
Marcelo, that's a tricky question, simply because there are so many different styles of cinema. Trying to nail it down to a single "look" is tough. However, there are a couple of looks that could be defined as having a cinematic quality. Shooting slightly wide angle to normal, around 28mm-35mm on your Fuji, and shooting telephoto with a shallow depth of field.
With your 15-45mm, you already have the wide to normal range covered, so you could achieve a cinematic look with your existing gear, it would just take studying camera angles and focal length that some of your favorite directors use and practicing.
Having a slightly faster lens like the 35mm f/2 can give you a very nice look with a more shallow depth of field, and having a longer lens would definitely give you more options for isolating your subject matter against. shallow, compressed background. Fuji's 50-230 is an inexpensive zoom that would give you that nice long lens look. If you wanted to spend a little more, then you might consider the 90mm f/2, or Fuji's 16-80mm f/4. Hope that helps. What style of video are you interested in shooting?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Thanks so much for your recomendations, Id like to make a short film drama actually it will be my first one. For now im doing music videos ( to practice and for fun)
That’s a good way to practice! I actually shot my first music video earlier this year, entirely with the 35mm f/2:
“Dr. Fauci Say" Music Video ruclips.net/video/aa_X2zjxOnw/видео.html
I wish this lens had 9 aperture blades for better bokeh
Thanks for the comment. While it's true that more blades made for smoother circles of confusion, the bokeh on the 90 has a pretty cool style. I like the way it looks. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I have an X-Pro3 and I shoot street, travel, and portraits. I've checked the 80mm f2.8 Macro and the new 50mm f1.0, but I'm not a fan of their lemon shaped bokeh balls at their widest aperture. I like the 56mm f1.2, but it's not WR. I guess I'll stick with my 50mm f2 for now.
That 50 f/2 is a pretty awesome lens, especially for the price, size, weight and the fact that it’s weather sealed. 👍
Why I Love This Lens - FUJIFILM XF50mm f/2 WR ruclips.net/video/48r4YuADH50/видео.html
This video won't play
John, I'm sorry you're having issues when trying to view this video. What kind of device are you using to watch it?
9:14
😀👍
Fuji 56mm f/1.2 APD is better.
I haven't actually used the 56mm APD version, but I do have the original 56mm f/1.2. It does have incredibly optics, but I do like the slightly longer focal length of the 90mm, and it has a much faster AF motor than the 56. They're both great lenses, though, and highly capable tools for different uses.
What Fuji do you use and what do you like to shoot?
10% into your video and you have not talked about the 90 yet. Yikes. What a waste of time!
Thanks for your comment. You're right. First mention of the 90 is at 1:40, but I wanted to give some background about my style and history, which is a large part of why I love this lens... just like the title says. Are you a Fuji shooter?
YOU NEED TO RELAX WHEN DOING YOUR VIDEOS
Hey Daniel, you're not wrong. 🤣 I get pretty excited when talking about cameras and stuff. I do try to keep myself under control, but it doesn't always work. I'm much more diligent on some videos, while others are basically a runaway train of energy. In fact, one time in college, someone said to me, "you have much more energy than you need." Thirty years later, nothing has changed.
BTW, What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I have the Fujifilm X-T3, 18- 55 and the 90mm love them
That’s a great, very compact and very capable setup! Keep having fun with it. 👍📷