p PROJECT 67 We just need 67 non-corrupt senators to impeach corrupt justices. It does not matter if they are democrats or republicans, except that a republican has the extra burden of being first. p
The court is Partisan. It's unethical and will continue to be that way. We need ethics reform that they need to be held too. They are terrible human beings!
Maybe have a random court oversee the Supreme Court by each state appointing one judge from each state to a pool that 10 judges who would be randomly selected for 3 years. This oversight board can punish Supreme Court Justices by forcing recusal from certain cases or giving them a three-case unpaid leave for accepting bribes or something. Impeach and convict isn't working like it should.
@meknotewe8155 Obama assassinated an American citizen who was accused of terrorism and then his teenage son was murdered as well without charge or even evidence. When an American President can muder citizens without due process than the constitution has already been thrown away with impunity. The duopoly only complains when it's the other side BUT that's just to give cover for the obvious fact that there's 2 sets of rules, 1. The Establishment is above the Law unless they are polically inconvenient & they don't have political skeletons to threaten, think B. Menendez who only did ol' fashioned BUT he did it the incorrect way by taking payments upfront instead of the proper way like The Clintons getting paid millions in speaking fees for taking care of interest groups. Then there's Gov. Cuomo who colluded with insurance companies to change safety laws in oldage homes so that they could all be shoved in together if they got Covid saving them millions at the cost of seniors who died alone for their greed. He was politically inconvenient BUT unfortunately he has many DNC skeletons as his family is a political dynasty, therefore a resignation for crimes considerably less egregious that served as a distraction of what could be credibly argued to be mass murder if it could be proved they fully understood the obvious results of placing elderly patients together with Covid. That's why its laughable to believe that the current SCOTUS is anything other than a continuation of business as usual. In fact, at least it rips away the veneer of legitimacy from corrupt court used to protect corrupt politicians. The system works.
I highly recommend Stephen Vladeck’s book “The Shadow Docket” which describes how the Supreme Court has been overusing that mechanism in recent years to “decide” certain cases without publishing a full legal opinion.
I would like having him for a teacher; he explains things very well, even without notes. So many teachers I've had were depending on old notes during their classes. It appears that this guy stays current with important legal matters.
Obama assassinated an American citizen who was accused of terrorism and then his teenage son was murdered as well without charge or even evidence. When an American President can muder citizens without due process than the constitution has already been thrown away with impunity. The duopoly only complains when it's the other side BUT that's just to give cover for the obvious fact that there's 2 sets of rules, 1. The Establishment is above the Law unless they are polically inconvenient & they don't have political skeletons to threaten, think B. Menendez who only did ol' fashioned BUT he did it the incorrect way by taking payments upfront instead of the proper way like The Clintons getting paid millions in speaking fees for taking care of interest groups. Then there's Gov. Cuomo who colluded with insurance companies to change safety laws in oldage homes so that they could all be shoved in together if they got Covid saving them millions at the cost of seniors who died alone for their greed. He was politically inconvenient BUT unfortunately he has many DNC skeletons as his family is a political dynasty, therefore a resignation for crimes considerably less egregious that served as a distraction of what could be credibly argued to be mass murder if it could be proved they fully understood the obvious results of placing elderly patients together with Covid. That's why its laughable to believe that the current SCOTUS is anything other than a continuation of business as usual. In fact, at least it rips away the veneer of legitimacy from corrupt court used to protect corrupt politicians. The system works.
@@meknotewe8155Obama assassinated an American citizen who was accused of terrorism and then his teenage son was murdered as well without charge or even evidence. When an American President can muder citizens without due process than the constitution has already been thrown away with impunity. The duopoly only complains when it's the other side BUT that's just to give cover for the obvious fact that there's 2 sets of rules, 1. The Establishment is above the Law unless they are polically inconvenient & they don't have political skeletons to threaten, think B. Menendez who only did ol' fashioned BUT he did it the incorrect way by taking payments upfront instead of the proper way like The Clintons getting paid millions in speaking fees for taking care of interest groups. Then there's Gov. Cuomo who colluded with insurance companies to change safety laws in oldage homes so that they could all be shoved in together if they got Covid saving them millions at the cost of seniors who died alone for their greed. He was politically inconvenient BUT unfortunately he has many DNC skeletons as his family is a political dynasty, therefore a resignation for crimes considerably less egregious that served as a distraction of what could be credibly argued to be mass murder if it could be proved they fully understood the obvious results of placing elderly patients together with Covid. That's why its laughable to believe that the current SCOTUS is anything other than a continuation of business as usual. In fact, at least it rips away the veneer of legitimacy from corrupt court used to protect corrupt politicians. The system works.
@meknotewe8155 Obama assassinated an American citizen who was accused of terrorism and then his teenage son was murdered as well without charge or even evidence. When an American President can muder citizens without due process than the constitution has already been thrown away with impunity. The duopoly only complains when it's the other side BUT that's just to give cover for the obvious fact that there's 2 sets of rules, 1. The Establishment is above the Law unless they are polically inconvenient & they don't have political skeletons to threaten, think B. Menendez who only did ol' fashioned BUT he did it the incorrect way by taking payments upfront instead of the proper way like The Clintons getting paid millions in speaking fees for taking care of interest groups. Then there's Gov. Cuomo who colluded with insurance companies to change safety laws in oldage homes so that they could all be shoved in together if they got Covid saving them millions at the cost of seniors who died alone for their greed. He was politically inconvenient BUT unfortunately he has many DNC skeletons as his family is a political dynasty, therefore a resignation for crimes considerably less egregious that served as a distraction of what could be credibly argued to be mass murder if it could be proved they fully understood the obvious results of placing elderly patients together with Covid. That's why its laughable to believe that the current SCOTUS is anything other than a continuation of business as usual. In fact, at least it rips away the veneer of legitimacy from corrupt court used to protect corrupt politicians. The system works.
@meknotewe8155 Obama assassinated an American citizen who was accused of terrorism and then his teenage son was murdered as well without charge or even evidence. When an American President can muder citizens without due process than the constitution has already been thrown away with impunity. The duopoly only complains when it's the other side BUT that's just to give cover for the obvious fact that there's 2 sets of rules, 1. The Establishment is above the Law unless they are polically inconvenient & they don't have political skeletons to threaten, think B. Menendez who only did ol' fashioned BUT he did it the incorrect way by taking payments upfront instead of the proper way like The Clintons getting paid millions in speaking fees for taking care of interest groups. Then there's Gov. Cuomo who colluded with insurance companies to change safety laws in oldage homes so that they could all be shoved in together if they got Covid saving them millions at the cost of seniors who died alone for their greed. He was politically inconvenient BUT unfortunately he has many DNC skeletons as his family is a political dynasty, therefore a resignation for crimes considerably less egregious that served as a distraction of what could be credibly argued to be mass murder if it could be proved they fully understood the obvious results of placing elderly patients together with Covid. That's why its laughable to believe that the current SCOTUS is anything other than a continuation of business as usual. In fact, at least it rips away the veneer of legitimacy from corrupt court used to protect corrupt politicians. The system works.
@@meknotewe8155@meknotewe8155 Obama assassinated an American citizen who was accused of terrorism and then his teenage son was murdered as well without charge or even evidence. When an American President can muder citizens without due process than the constitution has already been thrown away with impunity. The duopoly only complains when it's the other side BUT that's just to give cover for the obvious fact that there's 2 sets of rules, 1. The Establishment is above the Law unless they are polically inconvenient & they don't have political skeletons to threaten, think B. Menendez who only did ol' fashioned BUT he did it the incorrect way by taking payments upfront instead of the proper way like The Clintons getting paid millions in speaking fees for taking care of interest groups. Then there's Gov. Cuomo who colluded with insurance companies to change safety laws in oldage homes so that they could all be shoved in together if they got Covid saving them millions at the cost of seniors who died alone for their greed. He was politically inconvenient BUT unfortunately he has many DNC skeletons as his family is a political dynasty, therefore a resignation for crimes considerably less egregious that served as a distraction of what could be credibly argued to be mass murder if it could be proved they fully understood the obvious results of placing elderly patients together with Covid. That's why its laughable to believe that the current SCOTUS is anything other than a continuation of business as usual. In fact, at least it rips away the veneer of legitimacy from corrupt court used to protect corrupt politicians. The system works.
Canadian here. I am very worried about the disintegration of your judicial arm. For example, we have been affected by the Republican spill over of voting machine disinformation. The Alberta legislative arm JUST this week passed hand count laws for every municipal election. The only recourse we have is in the courts. Even we can see Trump is just trying to stay out of jail.
@@northernbohemianrealist Welcome fellow bohemian! This fight for democracy is real. I am watching it in Finland, Germany, France, Netherlands... Canada is not immune. I follow heather Cox Richardson and her analysis really does give me hope.
@@femkevandelft177 I am fifth generation American, but the older I get, the more Slav emerges within me. Our people remember the Sudetenland. "Peace in our time." Our Ukrainian brothers face exactly the same thing. This 'enemy within' business is also familiar to our people We were vermin to be exterminated for lebensraum. Nothing like that going today, eh?
It's not entirely due to the ex-president but the Heritage Foundation, and the court justices themselves who have used precedence of someone 400+ years ago who feared witchcraft. The perception of biases with the majority of members is going to create chaos in the judiciary, and the judicial system. Aileen Cannon is a prime example.
9:07 “The best defense against [the appearance of partisanship] is through its behavior.” But there is NO chance of them changing their ideologies to rule any differently! Why would you even waste your breath suggesting something they are never, ever going to do?
God, thank you. I'm losing my mind with people like this who keep repeating these white-washy statements as though we're actually involved in reasonable argument, as opposed to a slow motion coup & dismantling of democracy. I now feel like it's inevitable precisely BECAUSE OF INTERVIEW LIKE THIS. God dammit. Anyway, thank for the comment.
Previous courts had some decisions that seemed obvious ("how else could this have been decided?") and some that were surprising, but they always seemed to be sincerely trying to make the "right" choices. I feel like the Roberts court is simply our enemy. They spend their effort deciding what they can get away with and then do the most extreme partisan thing possible.
@@j.n.sloane This applies to all judges. I have practiced law for twenty-nine years and can name only two, TWO, who weren't on the bench solely for ego. That's two of hundreds of those birds.
This was a very good article/interview. Congress should retire/readjust the Supreme Court because there is no credibility for years. Laws are now made for one/specific political party. Have we forgotten the real purpose of "checks and balances?
Talk is cheap ! It doesn't matter if the American public has no confidence in their supreme court, nothing will change unless they fix this serious problem, but for some inexplainable reason this will never happen!
It's not ratified. But they pretend women and men have the same rights. If that's the case women should go pit there and file a suit about differential treatment, like inability to walk out on pregnancy, inability to get the same types of treatments as men. E.g. treatment to stop the bleeding, expedient cancer treatments, ability to shot a robber that happens to be in their bodies and is trying to steal their resources or cause bodily harm. This is controversial only to those who see double standards. We are not exactly the same but we need both genders to make ours a great society. We can't ignore over half the population
I’d like to see President Biden shut down the court and send them all home. At least the court wouldn’t be able to cheat trump back into office and crown him king.
The problem is undergrads with throwaway BA degrees that can’t make a living that go to law school and come out dumber than they went in. Then to keep them from starving in private practice, their pals put them up for a judgeship.
There is no longer A Supreme in the high court. It left the building long ago. We are just now seeing it in full bloom. It was cooked and stacked and then we have this Mess with people who do not follow the rule of law, they just make up their own. SHAME ON THEM BIG TIME Another Thought, a person becomes a Lawyer to learn the rules of law but then has no problem breaking them, how can you ever trust them again?
Your supreme court is corrupt and maybe it's time to start acknowledging that instead of this rubbish posturing and weaselling. Boring and lame interview, you guys are so out of touch.
Need to get out out the vote, and pass the message. Seriously. Hope America understands it. Kamala Harris need to win almost all the swing states, so as to prevent MAGA and trump sickofans no chance.
I am not familiar enough w the Tennessee anti gender affirming care law, but doesn’t this also apply to “cis gendered” people who are having medical problems associated with their own levels of hormones? I know of kids who never started puberty at a reasonable age or whose growth hormones where either stunted out of the “norm” or who had out of out of control growth that threatened their health. Their families took them to get medical help. Doesn’t this law also prevent everyone from getting this kind of help? Whether it’s to “transfer” the traits of gender, or just “maintain” the traits of an originally recognized gender?
A 12 year old is explaining law🤣🤣but dangerously leaning out the window. Qatar owns our colleges, so makes sense why you only see one side of the story.When did public television move to Russia and Iran?( no seriously?)Work at being an American!!!!
it’s gonna take 50 years to undo the damage this court is causing.
Our environment doesn't have 50 years.
No it won’t. Get a democrat supermajority in Congress and we will fix it all in one term.
@@paulkesler1744 That’s kind of the tragedy of the whole thing.
Not necessarily. The court can be expanded in size.
p
PROJECT 67 We just need 67 non-corrupt senators to impeach corrupt justices. It does not matter if they are democrats or republicans, except that a republican has the extra burden of being first.
p
The court is Partisan. It's unethical and will continue to be that way. We need ethics reform that they need to be held too. They are terrible human beings!
Maybe have a random court oversee the Supreme Court by each state appointing one judge from each state to a pool that 10 judges who would be randomly selected for 3 years. This oversight board can punish Supreme Court Justices by forcing recusal from certain cases or giving them a three-case unpaid leave for accepting bribes or something. Impeach and convict isn't working like it should.
Especially the woman who took away a woman's RIGHT TO CHOOSE!!!
Six of the corrupt Supreme Court jesters need
To go.
Hint: all come from Heritage Foundation
@meknotewe8155 Obama assassinated an American citizen who was accused of terrorism and then his teenage son was murdered as well without charge or even evidence. When an American President can muder citizens without due process than the constitution has already been thrown away with impunity. The duopoly only complains when it's the other side BUT that's just to give cover for the obvious fact that there's 2 sets of rules, 1. The Establishment is above the Law unless they are polically inconvenient & they don't have political skeletons to threaten, think B. Menendez who only did ol' fashioned BUT he did it the incorrect way by taking payments upfront instead of the proper way like The Clintons getting paid millions in speaking fees for taking care of interest groups. Then there's Gov. Cuomo who colluded with insurance companies to change safety laws in oldage homes so that they could all be shoved in together if they got Covid saving them millions at the cost of seniors who died alone for their greed. He was politically inconvenient BUT unfortunately he has many DNC skeletons as his family is a political dynasty, therefore a resignation for crimes considerably less egregious that served as a distraction of what could be credibly argued to be mass murder if it could be proved they fully understood the obvious results of placing elderly patients together with Covid. That's why its laughable to believe that the current SCOTUS is anything other than a continuation of business as usual. In fact, at least it rips away the veneer of legitimacy from corrupt court used to protect corrupt politicians.
The system works.
Dishonest, amoral individuals don’t deserve to be called justices
I highly recommend Stephen Vladeck’s book “The Shadow Docket” which describes how the Supreme Court has been overusing that mechanism in recent years to “decide” certain cases without publishing a full legal opinion.
I will read his book. He is an excellent, careful analyst.
Absolutely
I would like having him for a teacher; he explains things very well, even without notes. So many teachers I've had were depending on old notes during their classes. It appears that this guy stays current with important legal matters.
Obama assassinated an American citizen who was accused of terrorism and then his teenage son was murdered as well without charge or even evidence. When an American President can muder citizens without due process than the constitution has already been thrown away with impunity. The duopoly only complains when it's the other side BUT that's just to give cover for the obvious fact that there's 2 sets of rules, 1. The Establishment is above the Law unless they are polically inconvenient & they don't have political skeletons to threaten, think B. Menendez who only did ol' fashioned BUT he did it the incorrect way by taking payments upfront instead of the proper way like The Clintons getting paid millions in speaking fees for taking care of interest groups. Then there's Gov. Cuomo who colluded with insurance companies to change safety laws in oldage homes so that they could all be shoved in together if they got Covid saving them millions at the cost of seniors who died alone for their greed. He was politically inconvenient BUT unfortunately he has many DNC skeletons as his family is a political dynasty, therefore a resignation for crimes considerably less egregious that served as a distraction of what could be credibly argued to be mass murder if it could be proved they fully understood the obvious results of placing elderly patients together with Covid. That's why its laughable to believe that the current SCOTUS is anything other than a continuation of business as usual. In fact, at least it rips away the veneer of legitimacy from corrupt court used to protect corrupt politicians.
The system works.
If we had more justices on the court, they would be able to scrutinize more cases.
I have no faith in the court. Every term is a disaster
SCOTUS needs an 8 year term limit!!! So does Congress!!!
@@meknotewe8155Obama assassinated an American citizen who was accused of terrorism and then his teenage son was murdered as well without charge or even evidence. When an American President can muder citizens without due process than the constitution has already been thrown away with impunity. The duopoly only complains when it's the other side BUT that's just to give cover for the obvious fact that there's 2 sets of rules, 1. The Establishment is above the Law unless they are polically inconvenient & they don't have political skeletons to threaten, think B. Menendez who only did ol' fashioned BUT he did it the incorrect way by taking payments upfront instead of the proper way like The Clintons getting paid millions in speaking fees for taking care of interest groups. Then there's Gov. Cuomo who colluded with insurance companies to change safety laws in oldage homes so that they could all be shoved in together if they got Covid saving them millions at the cost of seniors who died alone for their greed. He was politically inconvenient BUT unfortunately he has many DNC skeletons as his family is a political dynasty, therefore a resignation for crimes considerably less egregious that served as a distraction of what could be credibly argued to be mass murder if it could be proved they fully understood the obvious results of placing elderly patients together with Covid. That's why its laughable to believe that the current SCOTUS is anything other than a continuation of business as usual. In fact, at least it rips away the veneer of legitimacy from corrupt court used to protect corrupt politicians.
The system works.
@meknotewe8155 Obama assassinated an American citizen who was accused of terrorism and then his teenage son was murdered as well without charge or even evidence. When an American President can muder citizens without due process than the constitution has already been thrown away with impunity. The duopoly only complains when it's the other side BUT that's just to give cover for the obvious fact that there's 2 sets of rules, 1. The Establishment is above the Law unless they are polically inconvenient & they don't have political skeletons to threaten, think B. Menendez who only did ol' fashioned BUT he did it the incorrect way by taking payments upfront instead of the proper way like The Clintons getting paid millions in speaking fees for taking care of interest groups. Then there's Gov. Cuomo who colluded with insurance companies to change safety laws in oldage homes so that they could all be shoved in together if they got Covid saving them millions at the cost of seniors who died alone for their greed. He was politically inconvenient BUT unfortunately he has many DNC skeletons as his family is a political dynasty, therefore a resignation for crimes considerably less egregious that served as a distraction of what could be credibly argued to be mass murder if it could be proved they fully understood the obvious results of placing elderly patients together with Covid. That's why its laughable to believe that the current SCOTUS is anything other than a continuation of business as usual. In fact, at least it rips away the veneer of legitimacy from corrupt court used to protect corrupt politicians.
The system works.
@meknotewe8155 Obama assassinated an American citizen who was accused of terrorism and then his teenage son was murdered as well without charge or even evidence. When an American President can muder citizens without due process than the constitution has already been thrown away with impunity. The duopoly only complains when it's the other side BUT that's just to give cover for the obvious fact that there's 2 sets of rules, 1. The Establishment is above the Law unless they are polically inconvenient & they don't have political skeletons to threaten, think B. Menendez who only did ol' fashioned BUT he did it the incorrect way by taking payments upfront instead of the proper way like The Clintons getting paid millions in speaking fees for taking care of interest groups. Then there's Gov. Cuomo who colluded with insurance companies to change safety laws in oldage homes so that they could all be shoved in together if they got Covid saving them millions at the cost of seniors who died alone for their greed. He was politically inconvenient BUT unfortunately he has many DNC skeletons as his family is a political dynasty, therefore a resignation for crimes considerably less egregious that served as a distraction of what could be credibly argued to be mass murder if it could be proved they fully understood the obvious results of placing elderly patients together with Covid. That's why its laughable to believe that the current SCOTUS is anything other than a continuation of business as usual. In fact, at least it rips away the veneer of legitimacy from corrupt court used to protect corrupt politicians.
The system works.
@@meknotewe8155@meknotewe8155 Obama assassinated an American citizen who was accused of terrorism and then his teenage son was murdered as well without charge or even evidence. When an American President can muder citizens without due process than the constitution has already been thrown away with impunity. The duopoly only complains when it's the other side BUT that's just to give cover for the obvious fact that there's 2 sets of rules, 1. The Establishment is above the Law unless they are polically inconvenient & they don't have political skeletons to threaten, think B. Menendez who only did ol' fashioned BUT he did it the incorrect way by taking payments upfront instead of the proper way like The Clintons getting paid millions in speaking fees for taking care of interest groups. Then there's Gov. Cuomo who colluded with insurance companies to change safety laws in oldage homes so that they could all be shoved in together if they got Covid saving them millions at the cost of seniors who died alone for their greed. He was politically inconvenient BUT unfortunately he has many DNC skeletons as his family is a political dynasty, therefore a resignation for crimes considerably less egregious that served as a distraction of what could be credibly argued to be mass murder if it could be proved they fully understood the obvious results of placing elderly patients together with Covid. That's why its laughable to believe that the current SCOTUS is anything other than a continuation of business as usual. In fact, at least it rips away the veneer of legitimacy from corrupt court used to protect corrupt politicians.
The system works.
Great content. Way to go, Amanpour and Company. 💙💙💙💙💙💙
Mr. Vladeck is unbelievably bright.
Of course. He's a Slav.
@@GeeBoggs Aw thanks Mom! 😌 Kidding - I loved that article!
Sometimes, professors really do know what they are talking about!
Christine - please do some segments on Opus Dei and its impact on our country. 🙏
Hideous on ALL counts, but particularly how they are not only accepting of but ADVOCATES OF misconduct. God help us.
Canadian here. I am very worried about the disintegration of your judicial arm. For example, we have been affected by the Republican spill over of voting machine disinformation. The Alberta legislative arm JUST this week passed hand count laws for every municipal election. The only recourse we have is in the courts. Even we can see Trump is just trying to stay out of jail.
I hope that Canadians seriously consider welcoming our educated, sharp, democratic principled people as they seek asylum.
@@northernbohemianrealist Welcome fellow bohemian! This fight for democracy is real. I am watching it in Finland, Germany, France, Netherlands... Canada is not immune. I follow heather Cox Richardson and her analysis really does give me hope.
@@femkevandelft177 I am fifth generation American, but the older I get, the more Slav emerges within me.
Our people remember the Sudetenland. "Peace in our time." Our Ukrainian brothers face exactly the same thing.
This 'enemy within' business is also familiar to our people We were vermin to be exterminated for lebensraum. Nothing like that going today, eh?
I am worried for all democracies, as ours undergoes such destabilizing challenges. I hope we can also model a recovery.
@@charlottegibbs8950 Yes to modelling a recovery. Thank you for this.
I’m so glad I discovered this channel. Superb!
They should be forced to recuse themselves when appropriate!!
Absolutely
Money talks
No one can make them
Since when did the US Supreme Court become a parliament?
Since Trump appointed a third of its membership in just one term.
It's not entirely due to the ex-president but the Heritage Foundation, and the court justices themselves who have used precedence of someone 400+ years ago who feared witchcraft.
The perception of biases with the majority of members is going to create chaos in the judiciary, and the judicial system.
Aileen Cannon is a prime example.
Not so much a Parliament as a Star Chamber supporting the Maga Cult.
Great guest !!
We are all equal, some are just more equal than others! 😅
Animal Farm.... Always applicable in a socially stratified societies.
🤦♂️
"Our own worst enemy" ..
9:07 “The best defense against [the appearance of partisanship] is through its behavior.” But there is NO chance of them changing their ideologies to rule any differently! Why would you even waste your breath suggesting something they are never, ever going to do?
Court reform now. Vote blue 💙
God, thank you. I'm losing my mind with people like this who keep repeating these white-washy statements as though we're actually involved in reasonable argument, as opposed to a slow motion coup & dismantling of democracy. I now feel like it's inevitable precisely BECAUSE OF INTERVIEW LIKE THIS. God dammit. Anyway, thank for the comment.
Great interview.
Previous courts had some decisions that seemed obvious ("how else could this have been decided?") and some that were surprising, but they always seemed to be sincerely trying to make the "right" choices. I feel like the Roberts court is simply our enemy. They spend their effort deciding what they can get away with and then do the most extreme partisan thing possible.
Court reform now
This from people who went on and on about "activist judges" for decades.
Back again, want to reign as monarchs, getting power and of course more money
The Supreme Court should not be able to make any rulings regarding Trump.
At least 3 they should recuse
They are acting dictator until they get their guy back in.
Utterly disgraceful
TRAITORS !!!
Their Guy is a Putin Spy.
This! I wonder about the integrity of the judges, especially after their decision regarding immunity.
Another great interview Hari, thanks.
The Supreme Court: Nine little Napoleons with delusions of judicial grandeur
Not all nine. A few of them have concern and have expressed their concerns. I would say it was six of the nine who have delusions of grandeur.
@@j.n.sloane This applies to all judges. I have practiced law for twenty-nine years and can name only two, TWO, who weren't on the bench solely for ego. That's two of hundreds of those birds.
@@northernbohemianrealist, well, perhaps it's a matter of degree.
"The Supremes, Starring John Roberts and his five dwarfs"
This a very comical critique, but an extremely serious situation!
Should you call it the right wing Supreme Court? Or the Opus Dei Supreme Court…
Either
Everyone's equal before the law requires a convincing demonstration of authenticity, asap.
Well can't you see? We are all equal, some are just more equal! 😅
this is the federalist society courts.
not the peoples.
Absolutely
This was a very good article/interview. Congress should retire/readjust the Supreme Court because there is no credibility for years. Laws are now made for one/specific political party. Have we forgotten the real purpose of "checks and balances?
SCOTUS obviously has
Yes. We have a substantial minority of voters who would prefer Vladimir Putin over VP Harris. It's staggering.
Another excellent Amanpour video. I always wish that Rory Gilmore would show up for an interview and fulfill her career goal
The Supreme Court makes simple people like me wonder what is a judge, and how is a good one evaluated?
Frankly its the enemy within
Dont depend on the court! VOTE BLUE UP AND DOWN THE ENTIRE BALLOT!🗳☑️💙🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
💙💙💙💙💙
Absolutely
Talk is cheap ! It doesn't matter if the American public has no confidence in their supreme court, nothing will change unless they fix this serious problem, but for some inexplainable reason this will never happen!
They are trying. Senator Whitehouse RI.
Just have to win the election first.
💙💙💙
Vote blue in every race in every state to get court reform
@@robynjeucken3391and both chambers of Congress
Scotus is acting as Trump's legal defense team. Utterly disgraceful.
They currently have ZERO CREDIBILITY.
No. Its. Not. Its a last line of accountability.
What have Republicans taught is? We need to pack the courts
Increasing the number of justices to thirteen would certainly provide a better buffer against rogue justices.
Fascist, ismore like it!
It’s good for the Six of Nine that they have a life appointment or they’d likely have to live under a bridge.
Roberts doesn't seem to understand politics or public opinion.
Neither does the most useless attorney general in US history, Merrick Garland.
Don’t care , feels like is above anybody
Institute malpractice for judges... Not insurance, but out of pocket.... And I think these judges would tighten their political sphincters.
They'd better tread softly regarding the upcoming election.
Those cases should have never been filed. These cases are Lawfare.
I wonder if scotus thought of Biden being safe to have seal team 6 take trump out( legal like)
The Supreme Court will investigate itself like the police do lol
Not
It is not funny
the irony of how corruptible ideologues always are ...
“Avoid sending the message “ is still obfuscating the truth
I am very afraid of the supream court they are not equalimprium
True they don't serve democracy at all glad you liked it
Ratify the Equal Rights Amendment to protect women from Supreme Court Justices.
It's not ratified. But they pretend women and men have the same rights. If that's the case women should go pit there and file a suit about differential treatment, like inability to walk out on pregnancy, inability to get the same types of treatments as men. E.g. treatment to stop the bleeding, expedient cancer treatments, ability to shot a robber that happens to be in their bodies and is trying to steal their resources or cause bodily harm. This is controversial only to those who see double standards. We are not exactly the same but we need both genders to make ours a great society. We can't ignore over half the population
The Supreme Court voted its 100 million votes for Trump. So much for democracy.
Maybe if the Supreme Court did take all of 45 trivial lawsuits they might get something done for we THE people!
Has no credibility. What a disappointment
Supreme court has given Joe the power now to do whatever he likes not trump
Joe has executive unlimited
Power to use 😊
I’d like to see President Biden shut down the court and send them all home.
At least the court wouldn’t be able to cheat trump back into office and crown him king.
The problem is undergrads with throwaway BA degrees that can’t make a living that go to law school and come out dumber than they went in. Then to keep them from starving in private practice, their pals put them up for a judgeship.
Good interviewer! PBS let’s stop with Walter Isaacson !
There is no longer A Supreme in the high court. It left the building long ago. We are just now seeing it in full bloom. It was cooked and stacked and then we have this Mess with people who do not follow the rule of law, they just make up their own. SHAME ON THEM BIG TIME Another Thought, a person becomes a Lawyer to learn the rules of law but then has no problem breaking them, how can you ever trust them again?
Make Lying Wrong Again
🙏🏻💙🌊🇺🇸
Ghost guns are ridiculous and they must be banned.
Your supreme court is corrupt and maybe it's time to start acknowledging that instead of this rubbish posturing and weaselling. Boring and lame interview, you guys are so out of touch.
i like her necklace, i want to get one.
Need to get out out the vote, and pass the message. Seriously.
Hope America understands it.
Kamala Harris need to win almost all the swing states, so as to prevent MAGA and trump sickofans no chance.
I am not familiar enough w the Tennessee anti gender affirming care law, but doesn’t this also apply to “cis gendered” people who are having medical problems associated with their own levels of hormones?
I know of kids who never started puberty at a reasonable age or whose growth hormones where either stunted out of the “norm” or who had out of out of control growth that threatened their health. Their families took them to get medical help.
Doesn’t this law also prevent everyone from getting this kind of help? Whether it’s to “transfer” the traits of gender, or just “maintain” the traits of an originally recognized gender?
You guys try and convince us that the court could correct itself.. lmao.
It is blatant DISCRIMINATION.
Well, duh!!
2000 part duex.
Garcia Frank Miller Joseph Davis Lisa
A 12 year old is explaining law🤣🤣but dangerously leaning out the window. Qatar owns our colleges, so makes sense why you only see one side of the story.When did public television move to Russia and Iran?( no seriously?)Work at being an American!!!!
PBS is mostly locally funded. What color is the sky in your world?
🤔