The breakup in this animation is probably quite accurate and would explain why so many passengers watching everything happen from the life boats insist she went down in one piece.
Yeah, with how slow the breakup was as well as the darkness of the moonless night, I can understand why so many survivors testified that the ship didn’t split.
A stunning simulation. Good job. It has been lost on me how many people couldn't notice the breakup of the ship...unless: 1) The angle of break-up wasn't as severe as the J. Cameron version of the late 1990s. 2) The break-up was partially at the water line (somewhat obscuring the breaking up ). 3) The point of observation for most observers was more limited than assumed given the lack of light and the angles necessary to notice a significant break in the body of the vessel.
You need to remember that it was a moonless night in the middle of the north Atlantic. The only light source was from the ship. Once those went out, there wasn't much they would be able to see, bobbing along in a life boat hundreds of feet away. Also, trauma can do strange things to your mind. Making you recall things not quite as they were. But you are right on point 3. The perspective plays a key part in what people saw in the pitch darkness of the night.
Flip Fluids is an addon for Blender that is used to create these fluid simulations. In my opinion, I think it’s better than the built in fluid simulator for Blender.
She split between the third and fourth funnel. But the demise of her stern here looks awesome, even if Jack Thayer said that the stern swiveled around before plunging "as if to hide the horrible spectacle from us".
Holllld-on… when the titanic sunk… that last somehole teh yellow thingy- the last 2 didn’t fall off. And also- when it had split i half,mboth halves stood up right again and then the bow/other front half ahad sunk, this is the 2nd unrealistic one i’ve seen not accurate!!!
Look buddy, maybe fix up you're grammar so it makes sense. The way you said that both half's stood right up again, are you saying that they went back up to waterline level because that does not make any sense. Also this is a FLUID simulation, not a sinking theory animation.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
This simulation perfectly captures the wave that washed over the deck following the bridge going under and the breakup looks perfect
I always read about that wave, but it never seemed to get captured on the movies. I can see how that would be difficult for film.
@@c.f.pedraza4057 you’d think they could just use a wave pool machine or something but you’re right it’s always missing
I don't know what wave is being referred to
@@counterfeit1148 apparently a big wave washed over the boat deck when the bridge went under
Titanic doesnt sank that much fast. So i think there is no that wave to film in the movies. Sea is also very calm when titanic sinks. 🤓
Amazing. Love the wave over the boat deck and bridge at the start of the final plunge
Slick simulation. Looks pretty accurate to the latest sequences experts have calculated.
The breakup in this animation is probably quite accurate and would explain why so many passengers watching everything happen from the life boats insist she went down in one piece.
Yeah, with how slow the breakup was as well as the darkness of the moonless night, I can understand why so many survivors testified that the ship didn’t split.
Understanding how low the break area is in the water really shows.
this is probably one of the most accurate sinkings i have seen yet! well done :)
A stunning simulation. Good job. It has been lost on me how many people couldn't notice the breakup of the ship...unless: 1) The angle of break-up wasn't as severe as the J. Cameron version of the late 1990s. 2) The break-up was partially at the water line (somewhat obscuring the breaking up ). 3) The point of observation for most observers was more limited than assumed given the lack of light and the angles necessary to notice a significant break in the body of the vessel.
You need to remember that it was a moonless night in the middle of the north Atlantic. The only light source was from the ship. Once those went out, there wasn't much they would be able to see, bobbing along in a life boat hundreds of feet away.
Also, trauma can do strange things to your mind. Making you recall things not quite as they were.
But you are right on point 3. The perspective plays a key part in what people saw in the pitch darkness of the night.
thats soo cool!
The best and most accurate animation I ever seen ❤
Haven't you seen the titanic in real time videos!?
Wow! Nice simulation!
The rope when it split IM STILL STANDING! 🎵🎵
Yeah yeah yeah 🎵🔥🔥
Oh yeah!
I get but…
WHAT?!
Why is it still straight?!
@@EddyTheLogoLover-ng8lblol
And the fact that the ship is not that high when raised in the air
@@Malamull_705 yeah lol
even more epic
THAT WAS VERY SUPER COOL FROM THE 1997 MOVEI
What is flip fluid?
Flip Fluids is an addon for Blender that is used to create these fluid simulations. In my opinion, I think it’s better than the built in fluid simulator for Blender.
@@TamitySimulations-lk6bb Thanks
So is this simulation program called
better than movie.
damn 60 hour bake what was your CPU?
I thought it was real life for a second☠️
The funnel didn't collapse on the split but i only collapse from the water serious
Whoa!
For realistic titanic model float test put to 2x speed
video link for Jealousstatement video where he gave the model?
this is great theory
How did you make this?
3 of the funnels supposed to be on the bow only the break up is only the 4 funnel it's in the stern
Great
A little inaccuracy. I believe the ship split right under the third funnel, not a little before it
The forbidden water
For those of you who don't have 2 hours to spare to watch the minute-by-minute recreations
Nasa pc🌟
Good edit and epic
do the britannic next
It would be more amazing if Jack and Rose is placed there on top.
I think that maybe she needs to sink slowly for a better idea?
the titanic went to the backrooms.
maybe do 1997?
The movie is inaccurate
You missed the part when it run into the ice-cube…lol
*iceberg
Careful, your ship is sinking
Titanic Sinks In A Tub Of Water*
?
Титаник должен раскалываться между 4 и 3 трубой!!!
The survivors never claimed the ship splitter between the 4th and 3rd funnel
Cómo hace eso cómo hace eso
She split between the third and fourth funnel. But the demise of her stern here looks awesome, even if Jack Thayer said that the stern swiveled around before plunging "as if to hide the horrible spectacle from us".
No she did NOT
Nope your wrong the ship broke forward of the 3rd funnel
The 97 Titanic theory has been debunked because the area around the third funnel was never attached when she sunk with the bow.
are you Tamity😅?
Yes he is
I don’t lak titanic
Holllld-on… when the titanic sunk… that last somehole teh yellow thingy- the last 2 didn’t fall off. And also- when it had split i half,mboth halves stood up right again and then the bow/other front half ahad sunk, this is the 2nd unrealistic one i’ve seen not accurate!!!
You don't even know what the "yellow thingy" is and you think you know enough to say this is inaccurate? LOL OK
Look buddy, maybe fix up you're grammar so it makes sense. The way you said that both half's stood right up again, are you saying that they went back up to waterline level because that does not make any sense. Also this is a FLUID simulation, not a sinking theory animation.
Inaccurate
No
@@lochlanmuir2291 yes
@@Thel2552the only inaccurate thing is that there is no forward tower collapsing. Everything else is accurate. Don’t be stupid, mate
@lochlanmuir2291 not stupid.. I know. Its inaccurate PERIOD!
Reason?
I like the waves