For those "any Budget" people you should check out the OM-1 Micro Four Thirds Mirrorless Camera and Olympus lenses. 20 megapixel. It is smaller, light weight, weathersealed, great focusing and great for birds and anything moving.
I got the new Nikon Z8 and I will say that I am getting shots that I couldn’t have gotten with my dslr’s. There was a big learning curve and my longest lens is a f mount 70-200 2.8. Bird and animal photography is like hunting, but you come home with beautiful memories captured. Biggest problem with getting this camera is I have more gas.
@@TinManLee, thanks for replying to my comment. When I first found your RUclips videos, I was put off since you recommended the 2.8 lenses. After watching a few more, I totally get it now. Animal photography is no different than human photography by separating the subject from the background. You have a wealth of knowledge and experience. Thank you!
The Nikon Z8 is exactly the same as Nikon Z9 in terms of autofocus, speed and buffer (CF Card). So, the Nikon Z8 is a much much better choice than Sony A7R5 (6fps uncompressed raw & 4 fps in silent mode & focus accuracy is not good with the 200-600, the A7iv is a much much better choice in Sony) and for that budget it the Z8 even gives the A1 a run for its money.
That’s a good point thank you. Just received the Z8 and will test it out. Z8 specs is indeed impressive. But the 400 and 600 superteles are so difficult to get. I’m still in wait list of the 600. And I really like the real time zebra of Sony. Having said that I may sell some Z9s and get more Z8 though.
@@TinManLee Yes the Sony A7R5 will only be good with the 400/600 primes but not everyone can afford the 400/600 f 2.8/4 primes. And those who can will also buy the A1. The Sony A7R5 with 200-600 doesn't work as well as it does the Sony A7iv/A7R3 even with all its AI stuff. The Z8 & Z400mm f4.5 is a treat to use in premium midrange. The 180-600mm is also released. The Nikon lens lineup for wildlife is much diverse than any company. Theres 500pf f5.6, 300 pf f4, 100-400 f5.6, 180-600 f6.3, 400 f4.5, 400 2.8 tc, 600 f4 tc, 800 pf f6.3, 70-180 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8
What photographer RUclipsrs never talk about is the amount of money they spend traveling around to get those photos; the hardware is nothing compared to traveling expenses. Photography, or any other serious hobby, is expensive.
Good advice but, just for the experience, I'd be curious what you'd think of the new OM-1 and 150-400mm with built in TC. However, you make some good points about not needing the most expensive gear and what good value can still be found in the former top-of-the-line DSLR's.
I have a friend who has that combo and loves it. Definitely super light weight. I played with it for a few minutes and autofocus is decently fast. Not as fast as the 400 2.8 with A1 but still fast. I would like to have a side by side comparison with the photos one day.
Keep in mind that fps doesn’t include focusing time so if you have a slow focusing lens (motors) or you use extenders (1.4x drops speed 25% and 2x 50% on most canon bodies) you are not going to get the theoretical fps but substantially below it.
Photography is not about the most expensive gear. I agree. But...I have GAS. I cannot resist. And that is ok, others spent their money on cars. But coming to your question: my favorite camera right now is the Nikon Z9 but this because Nikon has the fabulous Nikkor Z 800mm 6.3 which is simply amazing for bird photography - exactly what I am into.
True. I haven’t used a d3 but I heard lots of great things. I did have a client who went to Alaska with me last year where he had a d5 and a Z9. With the eye tracking it makes focus a lot easier with the z9 but I agree it’s very expensive.
Nikon’s 50 1.2S is definitely at the same high performance level as Canon and Sony’s (I’d rank them 1. Sony, 2. Nikon, 3. Canon). I can’t think of any reason why a wildlife photographer would pick a A7R5 over a Z8, not close. Don’t sleep on OM1, awesome camera.
Shooting at high shutter speeds in low light means high ISOs. Have you noted any image quality troubles with 45+ MP full frame cameras vs the 24 MP ones?
I don't believe that the number of megapixels makes the photos more three-dimensional. You can try yourself, reduce the size of a photo to different resolution and make a comparison. I don't think you will see a difference until you zoom to 100% or about there.
Nikon's lens line up for telephotos is pretty amazing. 400mm and 600mm with built in TCs is incredibly flexible. 500mm PF and 800mm PF are easily handheld-able. Then there's that 400mm F4.5 and the new 180-600mm really rounds out the line up.
they're squeezing 20mp+ into 4/3, and no doubt more to come and the gear is so small and light and inexpensive... you can get a Lumix mirrorless kit for $1500 with eye tracking and Leica lenses...
@@TinManLee the new 20mp G95 i got has every feature you've ever mentioned for me to try, from back button focus to eye tracking to auto iso and zebra viewfinder - and the body was $700! I'm betting they'll have a 30mp 4/3 body in another year or two...
@@HI-ij4fj that’s awesome. Can’t wait to check out the pics. I may give it a try as it’s lightweight. I had an old Panasonic but it’s years ago and the lag on the evf was bad.
first of all the question you have to ask, is why and what do you photograph. If you are more interested in producing 'art' then all camera gear is just a tool and simple get what yeilds the results you desire. If you are into record shots and then get the most expensive and play that game.
Very good point. I did mention in the first minute or so that it’s geared towards action photography and challenging light condition such as low light. Sorry I may have talked too fast on that part. And very true camera is just a tool.
I would say that Canon has a big hole in its wildlife lens lineup as it doesn’t have anything like the Sony 200-600 or the new Nikon 180-600. If you don’t have the budget for the big primes, that makes Sony and Nikon a much better choice for wildlife than Canon.
That’s true. Canon only has the 100-500 f7.1 right? I will dig deeper into lens selection for my next video. Been watching a lot of reviews of the new Nikon zoom.
But the Canon RF 100-500 is the best wildlife lens I've ever used: the dual focus motors are exquisitely responsive, the lens OIS works well with my R7 IBIS, it is lighter than the 100-400 and 150-600 that I replaced, and the image quality is stunning across the aperture range. As for the maximum aperture, F6.3 extends all the way to 430 mm, and high ISO noise is not really an issue with modern sensors and denoising software. I don't think you should dismiss it so casually.
@@wellingtoncrescent2480 I agree with you the 100-500 is very sharp and focuses very quickly because I own it too. It really depends on what kind of photos you are after. I will explain it in details in my next video on lens.
200mm is often too long when on a wild life walk here in Oz. Also, look @ the mfd. The Canon 100-500 focusses very close and is great for snapping bugs out on a wildlife walk.
@@wellingtoncrescent2480Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the 100-500. I am tempted but it’s so expensive too. I have considered switching to Sony or Nikon specifically for their 200(180)-600mm lenses that are over $1000 less. But I do prefer Canon ergonomics and color, don’t think the A7iv is as good for birds, and can’t afford a Nikon Z8.
This guy is normal and honest. No bullshit
For those "any Budget" people you should check out the OM-1 Micro Four Thirds Mirrorless Camera and Olympus lenses. 20 megapixel. It is smaller, light weight, weathersealed, great focusing and great for birds and anything moving.
I got the new Nikon Z8 and I will say that I am getting shots that I couldn’t have gotten with my dslr’s.
There was a big learning curve and my longest lens is a f mount 70-200 2.8.
Bird and animal photography is like hunting, but you come home with beautiful memories captured.
Biggest problem with getting this camera is I have more gas.
Congrats on your purchase. That’s a powerful combo!
@@TinManLee, thanks for replying to my comment. When I first found your RUclips videos, I was put off since you recommended the 2.8 lenses.
After watching a few more, I totally get it now.
Animal photography is no different than human photography by separating the subject from the background.
You have a wealth of knowledge and experience.
Thank you!
The Nikon Z8 is exactly the same as Nikon Z9 in terms of autofocus, speed and buffer (CF Card). So, the Nikon Z8 is a much much better choice than Sony A7R5 (6fps uncompressed raw & 4 fps in silent mode & focus accuracy is not good with the 200-600, the A7iv is a much much better choice in Sony) and for that budget it the Z8 even gives the A1 a run for its money.
That’s a good point thank you. Just received the Z8 and will test it out. Z8 specs is indeed impressive. But the 400 and 600 superteles are so difficult to get. I’m still in wait list of the 600. And I really like the real time zebra of Sony. Having said that I may sell some Z9s and get more Z8 though.
@@TinManLee Yes the Sony A7R5 will only be good with the 400/600 primes but not everyone can afford the 400/600 f 2.8/4 primes. And those who can will also buy the A1. The Sony A7R5 with 200-600 doesn't work as well as it does the Sony A7iv/A7R3 even with all its AI stuff. The Z8 & Z400mm f4.5 is a treat to use in premium midrange. The 180-600mm is also released. The Nikon lens lineup for wildlife is much diverse than any company. Theres 500pf f5.6, 300 pf f4, 100-400 f5.6, 180-600 f6.3, 400 f4.5, 400 2.8 tc, 600 f4 tc, 800 pf f6.3, 70-180 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8
The Z8 only gives the A1 a run for his money on the spec sheet.
@@JessehermansonphotographyDid you use both ?
What photographer RUclipsrs never talk about is the amount of money they spend traveling around to get those photos; the hardware is nothing compared to traveling expenses. Photography, or any other serious hobby, is expensive.
Will you choose Sony A9III over A1 because of the global shutter?
Good advice but, just for the experience, I'd be curious what you'd think of the new OM-1 and 150-400mm with built in TC. However, you make some good points about not needing the most expensive gear and what good value can still be found in the former top-of-the-line DSLR's.
I have a friend who has that combo and loves it. Definitely super light weight. I played with it for a few minutes and autofocus is decently fast. Not as fast as the 400 2.8 with A1 but still fast. I would like to have a side by side comparison with the photos one day.
Keep in mind that fps doesn’t include focusing time so if you have a slow focusing lens (motors) or you use extenders (1.4x drops speed 25% and 2x 50% on most canon bodies) you are not going to get the theoretical fps but substantially below it.
Good point. Will talk more about lens in the next video and will dig deeper into that.
Photography is not about the most expensive gear. I agree. But...I have GAS. I cannot resist. And that is ok, others spent their money on cars. But coming to your question: my favorite camera right now is the Nikon Z9 but this because Nikon has the fabulous Nikkor Z 800mm 6.3 which is simply amazing for bird photography - exactly what I am into.
Haha we have the same issue: GAS. I just received the 800 6.3 too and can’t wait to try it out!
A nikon z9 would be nice but its way too expensive. My nikon d3 is still perfect for learning plus people are selling their G lenses
True. I haven’t used a d3 but I heard lots of great things. I did have a client who went to Alaska with me last year where he had a d5 and a Z9. With the eye tracking it makes focus a lot easier with the z9 but I agree it’s very expensive.
Thank you for the amazing content
Nikon’s 50 1.2S is definitely at the same high performance level as Canon and Sony’s (I’d rank them 1. Sony, 2. Nikon, 3. Canon). I can’t think of any reason why a wildlife photographer would pick a A7R5 over a Z8, not close. Don’t sleep on OM1, awesome camera.
Shooting at high shutter speeds in low light means high ISOs. Have you noted any image quality troubles with 45+ MP full frame cameras vs the 24 MP ones?
You missed my price range 😊. What would you recommend in the $2k - $3k range?
I’m in the same boat and I would get an R5 but I’m heavily invested in the canon system. It depends what else you got
Is Canon R5 having any sales? If your budget is above $2000 I will try to look for mirrorless that has over 45 mega pixels.
@@TinManLee r5 is 500 off right now, first sale I have seen. Is it still worth it? (use w canon 400 2.8)
I believe Canon is selling refurbished R5 cameras for $3000.
I don't believe that the number of megapixels makes the photos more three-dimensional. You can try yourself, reduce the size of a photo to different resolution and make a comparison. I don't think you will see a difference until you zoom to 100% or about there.
Just a guess but more megapixels allows for more colour graduation so seemingly looks more 3D in certain lighting conditions.
The gear you use absolutely makes a huge difference, providing you know how to use it because not all owners do!
Nikon's lens line up for telephotos is pretty amazing. 400mm and 600mm with built in TCs is incredibly flexible. 500mm PF and 800mm PF are easily handheld-able. Then there's that 400mm F4.5 and the new 180-600mm really rounds out the line up.
yes, i just got the new 400 tc and its amazingly light, in par with the 800
@@EliudGilSamaniego I'm so used to the 600mm f4, but the 400mm with TC makes a solid case for more flexibility.
@@silvere36 yes, the 400 TC is like having a 400 2.8 and a 600 f4 at the same time always in the same lens, is amazing
they're squeezing 20mp+ into 4/3, and no doubt more to come and the gear is so small and light and inexpensive... you can get a Lumix mirrorless kit for $1500 with eye tracking and Leica lenses...
I’m always curious to try as it makes ground level photography from a vehicle very easy with the weight reduction.
@@TinManLee the new 20mp G95 i got has every feature you've ever mentioned for me to try, from back button focus to eye tracking to auto iso and zebra viewfinder - and the body was $700! I'm betting they'll have a 30mp 4/3 body in another year or two...
@@HI-ij4fj that’s awesome. Can’t wait to check out the pics. I may give it a try as it’s lightweight. I had an old Panasonic but it’s years ago and the lag on the evf was bad.
the nikon 50 1.2 its so amazing, i love it so much and paired with the z9 i can get amazing 1.2 moving subject sharp images
That’s great to know. Nikon is doing something really right lately!
Sooooooo, have to go full frame, or larger, and mirrorlessl??? And , Sony or Nikon.
I would go for Sony :)
first of all the question you have to ask, is why and what do you photograph. If you are more interested in producing 'art' then all camera gear is just a tool and simple get what yeilds the results you desire. If you are into record shots and then get the most expensive and play that game.
Very good point. I did mention in the first minute or so that it’s geared towards action photography and challenging light condition such as low light. Sorry I may have talked too fast on that part. And very true camera is just a tool.
Thank you! Your advises and comments are deeply appreciated.
So glad to hear
I went for MFT Lumix G9 which has 20MP but it has a 80MP mode that is very usable with a tripod so I went with that option.
I would say that Canon has a big hole in its wildlife lens lineup as it doesn’t have anything like the Sony 200-600 or the new Nikon 180-600. If you don’t have the budget for the big primes, that makes Sony and Nikon a much better choice for wildlife than Canon.
That’s true. Canon only has the 100-500 f7.1 right? I will dig deeper into lens selection for my next video. Been watching a lot of reviews of the new Nikon zoom.
But the Canon RF 100-500 is the best wildlife lens I've ever used: the dual focus motors are exquisitely responsive, the lens OIS works well with my R7 IBIS, it is lighter than the 100-400 and 150-600 that I replaced, and the image quality is stunning across the aperture range. As for the maximum aperture, F6.3 extends all the way to 430 mm, and high ISO noise is not really an issue with modern sensors and denoising software. I don't think you should dismiss it so casually.
@@wellingtoncrescent2480 I agree with you the 100-500 is very sharp and focuses very quickly because I own it too. It really depends on what kind of photos you are after. I will explain it in details in my next video on lens.
200mm is often too long when on a wild life walk here in Oz.
Also, look @ the mfd. The Canon 100-500 focusses very close and is great for snapping bugs out on a wildlife walk.
@@wellingtoncrescent2480Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the 100-500. I am tempted but it’s so expensive too. I have considered switching to Sony or Nikon specifically for their 200(180)-600mm lenses that are over $1000 less. But I do prefer Canon ergonomics and color, don’t think the A7iv is as good for birds, and can’t afford a Nikon Z8.
Tin Man Lee does not choose the perfect camera……..because he owns them all!
Have you ever tried a nikon d4
What camera did Ansel Adams use?
A big one.
I think it’s a large format camera. The group f64?
the nikon tc super telephoto lenses has no competitor to this day, the 400 and 600 are alone in the top for wildlife and sports
Canon is coming out with a teleconverter that will allow zero, 1.4 and maybe 2x…….. which would be even better than what Nikon has!!
@@ghlocal1 allow zero what? :O that is very interesting
For example, when you apply the TC to a 400mm f/2.8, zero would be 400mm, then one click would be 1.4x (560mm), etc
我喜欢z9+428