I've been listening to your whole series on miaphysyism with an open mind, willing to steel-man the Chalcedonian arguments. But this video's discussion of the Gethsemane conundrum confirmed to me that the Chalcedonian position is certainly incorrect. If it's the human nature of Christ that says "not my will but yours", then which nature said "for I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me." (John 6:38)? Was the "human nature" the one that came down from heaven? You see why the Chalcedonian insistence on continuing to probe into the mystery of the incarnation gets one into irreconcilable positions?
Alleged "irreconcilable position" actually does not exist. Your interpretation of the John 6,38 is incorrect. When Lord says "not to do my own will", He refers to His human will, while phrase "but the will of him who sent me" refers to His divine will. Beginning of the verse: "for I have come down from heaven" asserts His origin, having no reference to the either of HIs two wills.
@@sherifhanna It appears that, what I wrote, is too complicated for your Monophysite mind... I would suggest you to read my previous comment as many times as needed until it eventually sinks in.
@@TheRoark of course not. That's my point. But Erhan in the video is claiming that Christ is speaking in a divided manner (contradicting Ephesus 431 anathemas) in His human nature alone.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
The Monotheite Controversy/6th Ecumenical Council is easily one of the most underappreciated periods in church history. Keep up the good work David.
Thx for your theological series 🙏
I really appreciate you bro 🙏 May God bless you 🙏 ❤
>In Nestorianism, unity is based on Will & Grace
I always knew that Nestorianism was fake, but this confirms it's also gay
Lol nice
why is the audio so low :(
I always assumed monothelitism led to Calvinism and hard determinism. I don’t see how it leads to universalism.
“Put your head in a toilet and flush it”. . . I feel this
Is the gnomic will a consequence of the fall or was it the cause of it?
I've been listening to your whole series on miaphysyism with an open mind, willing to steel-man the Chalcedonian arguments. But this video's discussion of the Gethsemane conundrum confirmed to me that the Chalcedonian position is certainly incorrect. If it's the human nature of Christ that says "not my will but yours", then which nature said "for I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me." (John 6:38)? Was the "human nature" the one that came down from heaven? You see why the Chalcedonian insistence on continuing to probe into the mystery of the incarnation gets one into irreconcilable positions?
Alleged "irreconcilable position" actually does not exist. Your interpretation of the John 6,38 is incorrect. When Lord says "not to do my own will", He refers to His human will, while phrase "but the will of him who sent me" refers to His divine will. Beginning of the verse: "for I have come down from heaven" asserts His origin, having no reference to the either of HIs two wills.
@@johnnyd2383 Fascinating to read the logical contortions that Chalcedonians must go through. "I came from heaven" refers to the "human" will, eh?
@@sherifhanna It appears that, what I wrote, is too complicated for your Monophysite mind... I would suggest you to read my previous comment as many times as needed until it eventually sinks in.
The "I have come down" is said by the one person of Christ, wills don't speak of themselves.
@@TheRoark of course not. That's my point. But Erhan in the video is claiming that Christ is speaking in a divided manner (contradicting Ephesus 431 anathemas) in His human nature alone.
Please edit out your obnoxious drinking of water. No one wants to hear this
allah akbar my dear brothers in christ!