Santa Clara Police To Pay Woman $7M After Entering Home, Injuring Her
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 сен 2017
- Santa Clara Police Department denies wrongdoing, but has agreed to a $7 million settlement after entering a home without a warrant and injuring a woman. Maria Medina reports (9/27/17)
That $7 million should come from Police pension fund instead of tax payer money.
👏🏼👏🏼And it should!
The citizens of Santa Clara should actually sue the Police Pension Fund to get the $7M back and/or the individual policemen that did the Kick Door In without a warrant for a minor child.
I agree makes no sense to take it from their victims.
Yeah. True!
More specifically, it should come from that police chief's pension.
That chief defending their actions infuriates me. He is the reason the injustice took place and needs to be held accountable
Thugs learn from thugs and their boss is a liar and a thug.
They always do this.
Yup, chief is endangering all his cops & every other cop out there. It's obvious why they burst in a door & injured a woman. Their chief covers for criminal behavior.
Chief corrupt to the core! He should be removed and jailed with the other criminals.
The chief defending their actions tells us that their actions are part of the culture and totally normal in his eyes.
One instance on video, wonder how many more instances not recorded or not made public.
He kicked the door in without a warrant and the chief thinks that’s ok. Unbelievable.
This Chief is the problem. Glad she won 7 million.
@@harryhanna8388 not paid by the Chief, but people like you and me
This should be mainstream news. Cops do this shit everywhere.
The people of the city should find his house and burn it down✌️
And he lied about the "hot pursuit" claim....a WEEK later is NOT in hot pursuit! They lie to justify.
They had no warrant nor exigent circumstances. Shameful.
What makes you think no exigent circumstances? Explain the entire encounter and case to me. You cant tell that from the smal clip that was shown in this news story. Its an assumption you are just jumping too without full context of the entire situation.
@@cunderwood2323so you're defending the @sshole?
You right, sure they try to cover their butts after the fact, but the city saw that they had no leg to stand on. Momma won the lottery there. 99 times out of 100, the police get away with breaking the law, so that is what the settlement really reflects.
They had no warrant, therefore they’re liable for all damages after they’ve illegally entered her home. Period.
In a moral world
@@richiejohnson in a moral world, there would be no entry without proper paperwork.
Within policy….They could have gotten a warrant, the crime was a week old…another day to procure a warrant was not unreasonable.
I agree completely
Unfortunately, it's the taxpayers who are liable.
Looks like the chief needs to be under investigation as well
I completely agree. Make a phone call and tell them this is uncalled for
No unnecessary force. Looooooool
Investigate the assholes
The chief is an old white guy. The victims are minorities. As much as conservatives want say that's using the race card and culture war, doesn't make it not true. That's just downplaying this atrocity which is defended by the government and paid for by taxpayers. We essentially pay to be terrorized.
Broke a leg him too
End Qualified Immunity and start holding law enforcement officers accountable for their criminal actions and lying. Jail Time!
“We investigated ourselves and determined we didn’t do anything wrong “
If a police chief doesn’t realize they need a search warrant then I’m fairly positive he needs a new job.
Search warrants are for searching homes to look for evidence against you for a crime. They dont need a search warrant to enter your home if they arent going to search it. Duh.
Yes, and that job should be OUTSIDE of law enforcement.
Yeah like maybe a news paper route. Or cleaning bathrooms in a county jail. Tyrants
If he doesn't understand that he needs locked up
this is california. they do whatever pops up in their 2 brain cells
Imagine how disappointed the chief would be if, instead of the insurance carrier, he and the officers had to pay the 6.7 mil.
The gun in his holster would come to good use after the news . One bullet is all it takes
It should come out of their budget, at least!
If the insurance pays the settlement, then it should CANCEL them! I wonder how difficult it would be to get another insurer? Probably a little difficult after a jury awarded all that cash!! I wouldn’t cover those Tyrannical Bullies!!!
Crack heads like u say defund the police. Financially isn't the only way to defund police. Stop harassing the cops. Without them you'd be dead end of story. Without police you'd be dead
Sad part is they would still force entry
" We didn't have warrant and still kicked her door in and assaulted her but, you're not getting the whole story. " Ya we are
Chief: they used the bare minimum of excessive force to break in and assault that woman, she didn’t die of suffocation so there was obviously no wrongdoing!
Reporter: that’s the high bar you’ve set?
Chief: oh no no we buried the bar years ago so we wouldn’t trip on it anymore, no wrongdoing possible!
An update for anyone who cares, Santa Clara PD has a new chief as of 2020.
Thank you
This is good news. Just what I wanted to hear.
Another corrupt pig I'm sure
That is not enough. He should also be charge for protecting an assault. And have a big cut in his pension! They always retire like that! Too easy!
Don't worry, I'm sure he will abuse the rights of citizens in another location.
Lawsuits need to start coming out of police department’s budgets.
They need to come out of their retirement funds. That way, ALL cops will have skin in the game, and it might make the so-called good ones a bit less tolerant of the thugs since it will cost them money.
END QUALIFIED IMMUNITY!!!👍🏽
Better ... out of that years salary budget for big departments. Over two to five years for smaller agencies. Court administered so there can't be any "creative accounting".
Their budget comes from tax payers. So they dont lose any money. Take it straight from the cops paychecks and pension fund.
IMHO:
In the case of Police Misconduct. Any settlement reached for misconduct, a percentage 10%-50% should come directly from the officers involved.
NOT to be paid to the victim’s but to the city as reimbursement.
** remove your emotions & think logically here **
If the officer has to pay the victim they will declare bankruptcy & tie it up in the courts.
Let the city pay it out & require the city to go after the officers involved.
This way the victim gets paid in full as soon as possible & the city has the means to go after the officer/s.
❗️ALSO❗️ WE have to make sure that any monies raised from crowdfunding for these officers go to a fund for victims of Police Misconduct and NOT to the officers directly!..Think Manson Law etc.
Currently most if not all police are covered by Qualified Immunity which must end!!! & the damn police unions as well.
Now think of your situation!!!
If you couldn’t get fired & were not personally financially responsible for your misconduct, what would your field of work look like!??
Why do you think MOST/NOT ALL gov departments suck!??
You have to be stupid if you think giving them more money is the answer!!!
NO ABSOLUTELY NOT!!
Holding them accountable is the answer JUST LIKE YOU & ME!!!
Do you agree or disagree???
Why!??
(Finally: You ever hear Police & Gov say if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about!??
Then WHY are the police & gov soooooooo against oversight & accountability!???🤔
Love how the Sheriff acted like they were in the right. No search warrant means their fault.
Doesn't matter if she said it was an accident at the time, when you scared of your attackers, you say nice things to try and calm the situation, and not make them any more angry and hurt you even more. Imagine the pain of a broken bone and wondering what they might do next. And before anyone says but it's the police, how many of these videos do we see where the suspect doesn't even make it out alive.
Do you happen to know any civil rights lawyer in Rockford, IL area?
The police chief should be dismissed instantly. Furthermore, he should be investigated. A person who would commit this type of crime once and show zero remorse has probably done it before.
AND: will do it again!
That police chief must be in rest permanently
What should happen to the arson?
@@jimmyb1844 Whaaaaaat?
Absolutely right. Qualified immunity will SAVE them all. For Everything.
They forced entry without a warrant. They weren’t in “hot pursuit”. They should face criminal charges of breaking and entering and assault and battery
not to mention a great way to get the case thrown out. and frankly after that i would enter a motion for change of venue.
👍
@Jo Mrtz Mentally and morally bankrupt NPC's and even worse training
@Pumpkinhead Pumkinhead I heard the judge made him her butler
Make their whole life public so we can see if those cops are still criminals
“We investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong “….
But they didn’t have a warrant. How does he stand by them?
no warrant, week old crime = "hot pursuit"
enjoy your 7M $ lady!
to Lucifer, u's a one frustrated little midget.
Actually the Taxpayers need to fit the bill on these cases because the Chief is an elected official and is the primary driver of the department. Also these officers should be fired and sued civilly as well since the committed felonies and are no longer covered under immunity clauses.
All officers who participated should be be charged misdemeanors or felonies depending on the laws broken and have a significant portion of their wages garnished till the debt is paid. Maybe then they will be more wise about how they enforce the law legally and in a safe manner. If citizens break law it can be jail, restitution ect. As they are supposed to be setting an example the consequences should be just as harsh as ours if not worse.
Can I get a thousand?
@@SoItGoes5 Tax payers didn't pay, it, Santa Clara County's insurance company paid it. What doesn't get discussed about these civil cases is how much the premiums are for that insurance on a yearly basis, and who is paying those annual premiums. In New York City for example, the Police Union pays for the Cities insurance. Not sure about who's paying in Santa Clara County.
"my officer used a minimum amount of force". Well they werent allowed to use any force, they didnt have a warrant
If that's minimun afraid to imagine what a maximum force be like!
Take that money and leave get that money out of that state and others with money should allow that state to become slum state drive the price of ocean front property down to 20 dollars an acre
@Jim Asimenios I hope your where kidding! They have needed a warrant since the signing of the 4th amendment.
@@jamesamonett9302 he was being facetious.
@@jamesamonett9302 4th doesn't mean what it used to, post Patriot Act
If there’s no warrant, there’s no entry.
I hope one day the police will be accountable.
Imagine “settling” for 7 mil, then going on TV and trying to defend that. Man the people of that city should absolutely be afraid of those cops. Every. Single. One.
"We had no warrant. We had no good camera angles. We've investigated ourselves and the woman is lying that we broke her ankle or the law."
Wait… so she got 7 million for a broken ankle and the man who was falsely imprisoned for 15 years got 5? How does that make sense
The chief says that they cut the video short and didn't show the part where she said it was an accident. Well, from the looks of the video, I'd say it came from the cops bodycam so why doesn't he show the rest of the video.
I wish I worked for an employer where I can keep my job even after costing them 7 million dollars.
@Black Labs Matter that’s who their employer is.
That is hilarious! 👍
“We did everything by book.” “Where’s the warrant?” “YOUR UNDER ARREST FOR OBSTRUCTING MY INJUSTICE!”
How can you tell he is lying!
The chief can't accept responsibility? Maybe the judge should increase the award to $10 million.
No warrant. That was breaking and entering with assault sanctioned by the chief. Shut down the department.
Jeff Shoemaker they settled with such a high amount so she wouldn't
Jeff Shoemaker,
In my state if an ordinary person commits a home intrusion,
I am entitled to assume that he is intending to use Deadly Force to kill me or my family.
In my state, if you are trying to use Deadly Force to try to kill me,
I GET TO KILL YOU BACK.
And if the law enforcement tries to break into my home without a warrant,
the they have no special powers or immunity.
They are just like any other criminal trying to break in and kill me.
Glenn Billings what state I want to move there
alex c,
those laws against home intrusion exist in any state that recognizes the Castle Doctrine.
WRONG. The Chief ised right. As long as the cops were freshly following leads ofed evidence which haved been freshly discovered they cand go ined to anywhere, even to homes. Whened they do appeal that foolished settling ofed that case the cops will win. It ised a legal rule the US Supremed court has supported many many times before. I am only 15 and even I do know that law.
They break into a person's home without a warrant and their response is that they are upset that the insurance company settled. Unreal.
Victimhood at its finest
Crazyyyyyy
No warranty. They didn't have to break that beautiful glass door. That was HER home. There had to be another way to resolve that issue w/o that bullshit going down. Police seem to think that violence with guns solves EVERYTHING. IT DOES NOT. THE 21ST CENTURY HAS BLOSSOMED INTO MUCH MORE THAN BLACK AND WHITE RULES ON PAPER. DIVERSE ISSUES AND PEOPLE REQUIRES A MORE DIVERSE TRAINING. MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES, DRUG CULTURES. OUR LAWS ARE OLD, AND METHODS ARE OUTDATED. NEW TIMES REQUIRE NEW TECH AND TRAINING. SEEMS LIKE LAW ENFORCEMENT WANNA BLAME KILLING PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY FEAR FOR THEIR LIVES. THEN IF YOUR INTELLIGENCE AND TRAINING CANT TEACH YOU TO TAZE INSTEAD OF TERRORIZING AND DOWN RIGHT KILLING. GET OUT OF IT. LET SOME NEW BLOOD INTO LAW ENFORCEMENT.
@@sheliabattle1129 The daughter was an arsonist, why are you worried about her door?
Im confused, who was the video from? Isn’t it body camera from the cop?
What part of "you don't have a warrant" do police not understand?
Chief: It stopped right before she said it was her fault
Ummmmm you guys were recording
Lmao!!!
Ya it was police body cams so who released the video
What there body cams just stopped working? It was their video & he says it stopped to shortly like there was a film crew there.
More likely "it conveniently stopped" just before the Cop probably said it was their fault !
Hahahaha, they stopped recording because they didn’t want people to see what really happened I guess. Really good point.
Fire the chief he is the problem with that department.
get the mayor money to
shahriar iran exactly
Fire? Do you mean like to burn him in a public fire? Like burning witches? 😂😂
This 7 million payout needs to come directly and only from the department involved
Fire the chief immediately
There is no "entire story to be told Chief": You entered her house, broke her ankle. This woman won and cost us $7M. You still defending your police thugs?
Maybe they should wear body cameras if they want the entire story told.... oh wait
@@MegTelevised FACTS!!
His men entered the house without a warrant, yet he wants to focus on how this was an accident... an accident his men caused.
@@777Skeptic exactly! no warrent fine use your hot pursuit bs, were you persuing mom? nope you were pursuing a 15 year old, so why is mom who is in her own home cuffed and being removed to another location? The answer no good reason they do this so violently her ankle breaks oh but she said it was an accident ok show me that footage, body cam was off $7 million dollars please.
Yup that's messed up the city should replace that chief with someone who actually does their job, if they keep this chief around their bound to lose millions more.
“They used minimal amount of force to break into her house without a warrant and caused an ankle break.” -what the chief meant to say. Also, even if she did trip herself and break her ankle it would not have happened if the cops were not breaking the law to get into her house without a warrant. Pretty disgusting.
Don't need a warrant when you harbor a known criminal.
Yes they do…
Sounds like it was a legal entry to arrest the young woman that tried to burn down the high school.
No they dont, depending on the situation. Ill give you an example. Lets say the known criminal in the house was suspected of just shooting someone down the street in a store. The cops would be REQUIRED to enter the house to get them , providing they had reasonable suspsion the person was prestently in the house. There would be little information if additional people were in the house that could be victims, or potential victims. To pretend like real life is black and white would be foolish. While most of the time a warrent is arequired, there are extending cirumstances that allow cops to by pass that requirement in order to protect other citizens.@@randomdragononthestreet8943
People are fed up with this
Hey Chief, Bodycam footage would have shown the whole story if your officers were wearing it. BTW, where was the warrant ?
If that is true that "they acted within the Law" Then how did the woman get 7 million dollars?
Because they had no right to enter the home without a warrant.
It's police logic lol !!!!
They didn't
because the city's insurance company made a decision to avoid a legal fight for the sake of cost-benefit analysis and/or the city counsel made a decision about optics.
The woman allegedly admits she tripped and fell in the full video. She was obstructing the arrest of her daughter, which is a crime, after she was identified as started a fire cUdong $350,000 in damage at her school.
It is nice to see criminals to get compensated.
This guy is smirking while he's lying, how's he even still have a job
A high paying job position with a solid pension.
BECAUSE THE ENTIRE SYSTEM IS CORRUPT!
Where is their body cam footage.
What about conveniently not having a warrant to enter the home?
Not surprising the cops acted like this when their boss is a dirty tyrant
You have to admit that the chief rocks a lot of pretty boy bling.
The missing part of the video was the warrant.
@@Jetsetfastfood I don't know if that's accurate but I am on the side of the police cheif. A warrant is not required to go inside a home to arrest someone, as long as there is reasonable suspision that the person is isn't. The fact that he lives there is all they need to bust down that door and make an arrest.
@@Moose300 When the police break down your door without following the legal protections we have as free citizens it's too late. At that point America is over.
@@Jetsetfastfood When you prevent police from entering your home to arrest someone for arson, you deserve to be arrested too.
Please tell me how it's illegal for police to enter a home to arrest that kid when they know he's inside.
An officer can arrest someone when they know where the suspect is.
An arrest warrant can be issued to let any police officer that encounters that person that they should be placed under arrest, it is not needed to go into a house to make an arrest.
A search warrant is often needed to go into a home, however that's just for searching a home. If the police arrested the kid and then searched his closest for evidence to what he did, that would be illegal without a warrant or reasonable suspision.
No warrant, no entry. They should've had their paperwork in order before the decided to break the door.
nicky pass stfu
I wanna know how does someone slip on a dry piece of concrete??? this mans acting like this happened in a snow state during winter lul
we can get our car impounded and arrested for not having paperwork. Do the whole job or no job at all. If ya'll had a warrant we wouldn't be out 7mil. Nice going Duey!
Police don't need a warrant to arrest a criminal they need a warrant they want to search your house and they don't know if you did anything wrong
@@jlucky11 what happened to innocent until proven guilty in a court of law?
Are these more of the 'good cops' that we keep hearing so much about?
"Minimal force" in entering a home without a warrant? How can he defend his officers in using any force in this?
The police chief needs to be fired.
No he does not...the daughter committed a crime found guilty....the mother should have turned her "No Good Daughter" into the police b4 they come to her door....I HOPE THE POLICE FILE AGAINST GIVING A MOTHER WITH A CRIMINAL DAUGHTER
7 MILLION...for what committing a crime...
LOL THATS FUNNY SHIT
@@doratiscareno5856 he most definitely does need to be fired because now the city is out 7 million because his cops dont know how to follow the law themselves. No warrant no enter. Now the criminal they were trying to stop got paid. Yea that's a good chief alright.
@@Hood.Housekeeping
Do you NOT GET...HER DAUGHTER IS A CRIMINAL
NON OF THIS WOULD OF HAPPEND....TURN YR DAUGHTER IN...THEY WOULD "HAVE NEVER HAD TO COME AND GET HER" SHE ADMITS IT WAS AN ACCIDENT WHEN SHE FELL ...PUT OUT THE WHOLE TAPE
@@Hood.Housekeeping
And you would HIDE YOUR DAUGHTER CORRECT
They can said anything they want.
Seeing that chef defending his officers is pretty disgusting.
Chim Ritchelds
Chief not chef
Hey man- don't be stupid and type something you don't mean.
He should be a chef actually since he likes to harm innocent creatures
@@sgillman16 I agree that he is bad but I hope that you do not hate all meat eaters.
There's a near 0% chance this met any reasonable definition of exigent circumstances which would obviate the need for a warrant.
Was the crucial part the warrant?
"Hot pursuit"? when the whole thing is a week old? That's stone cold!
pretty moldy
A STONE COLD LIE!!! WHEN THE DA SAID IT WAS NOT HOT PURSUIT!
If that's a hot pursuit then God knows how long a stake out is...
Anal forcing their way in without a warrant? No way buddy.
Stone cold LIE
Is the chief a liar or just stupid? Either way he should be fired.
Both LOL!🤣
Both 😂😂😂
Worse! he's an enabler that allows officers under his command to knowingly violate the very laws they are payed to enforce. He needs to be investigated.
Stupid liar
Both !!
None of these devils EVER see any wrongdoing when committing their evil!!!
No warrant before entry is the crucial point of the issue and the reason for injury compensation
So he stands by his officers illegally entering a citizen's property.
Did you really expect anything else from him? The corruption goes from the top all the way down.
Officers investigated officers and found officers did nothing wrong.
@Krypto Universe if you're talking about what I think you're no he doesn't.
He needs to be fired, lose his pension and jailed.
@@SupremeInvigilator Yup. Big surprise.
@@SupremeInvigilator but we have to pay always ....... :)
The officers used the “fresh or hot pursuit” exception for a crime allegedly committed a week earlier. Translation: police cost Santa Clara $7 mil ‘cause they broke the damn law!
She should have been awarded $70 million. She stood her ground as a good mother and citizen.
@@jamesfrederick99 Stood her ground by protecting a felon?
So if I show up to your house force my way in without a warrant and in the melee your ankle gets broke it's an accident?
Was the woman guilty of the crime and what did she do?
the crucial part of it, is they had no warrant.
And then try to justify it with a lie
No Warrant? No entry. Period! Officers should be arrested, charged and tried.
The video is missing a crucial part but she still got $7 million? Lmao chief, I guess the delusion starts from the top?
@@killmozzies Not the families, just the officer.
It's amazing how the body camera just happened to turn off at crucial parts huh bunch of bullshits what this is crooked ass cops
Chief has an unintelligent look about him, and he's a damn liar!
There’s an extended version but.... It just as bad and her admission was under duress... The brass in a lot of these departments are 🤡
I didn't know breaking someone's leg is considered "GOOD FAITH" he's dumber than he looks
Probably 7 million with zero accountability, and no admission of guilt!!
The fact that there was no warrant is a big deal
Did he seriously complain about a bodycam being "conveniently stopped"?
YES HE DID ---- THAT PROVES HE IS AN IDIOT -- NOTHING MORE.
Came here just for this comment.
Exactly
Let’s not forget it was the officer’s body camera that was “conveniently stopped.”
chief should be fired too.
The reason the city settled is not because they broke her leg (though that is an aggravating factor). The reason they settled is because the cops entered the home illegally by not having a warrant. That's a federal civil right violation.
And that is inexcusable. Unfortunately, the more powerful the government...the more of this you will get. Free isn't free
Eh wrong...didn't need one. Active pursuit began again when they ID'd her on public property...they didn't record that so had to settle because there is no "proof" of identifying her.
That's why they paid 7 million dollars ..cause they were right ?!
At the time of entry the person was only a suspect. I don't see how that gives the cops the right to enter the house.
tartredarrow
mom should be arrested for aiding her daughter when she wouldn’t let the police in to arrest her criminal daughter
WHERE WAS THE WARRANT?!
The chief needs to be fired. He's minimizing his lie
"They did nothing wrong. She tripped and fell simultaneously having an officers hands on her neck". WTF
What's amazing is that they didn't charge her with assaulting a cop.
Exactly
remember that the next time the police come kick your door down
@@melitonrodriguez7643 If the police come knocking on your door, you've fucked up.
@@Jianju69 sorry but no police will b knocking on my door not less they got wrong address and that leads to a big bank for me..
The police investigated themselves and found no wrongdoing.
That the problem as well. Police investigate themselves with the police code. That says hell I don't care what you did, you it was lawful!
Chief wasn't there. Yes good faith. 7 million of good Faith!!!
The only convenient thing is the cops routinely use excessive force and didn’t have a warrant.
Bottom line the law states there needs to be a warrant to enter someone's property.... you can't just pick and choose when you want to violate someone's rights. I mean how hard is it to get a warrant if you have the evidence to arrest the minor?
Taxpayer paid for that $7M. It should be deducted to the salaries of these police and officer who ordered this mistake.
M.D. Suave the police chief should work for free after letting all that horse shit come out his mouth
They should be fired
It actually came from an Insurance company if you were listening
@@habibbialikafe339. Who is paying for the insurance?
@@mdsuavejr if this case happened or didn't happen, the police department pays the same amount to the insurance. That's how insurance works. This 7 mil came entirely from a private company dude
Entering a residence without a warrant is not acting in good faith...Sorry Chief. You lose!
Hey all he has to do is release the full footage if he’s so inclined to stand by his officers.
Imagine defending somebody after they break an innocent persons leg without a warrant
No warrants, no entry, no justification.
Sorry Chief! You are not there! Going to a home without a warrant! Come on!
Should have gotten a warrant but that kid who set fire to a school is going to be a very large problem in future. Look at her demeanour when she sees her mother on the floor with her leg broken. We have a reaaal dangerous one here.
This chief should fired and stripped of his retirement and the other"officérs" charged and imprisoned!!!!
When the police chief defends it and says the officers did nothing wrong, he's saying it will happen again. And why wouldn't it? - they believe they did nothing wrong.
Dan Stewart; when are they ever wrong?, & they get fire to go to another department
If anybody loses their job, it should start with him.
@@angelsimmons5384 because it’s not coming from his pension
Jury of 12 said otherwise.
The fish stinks from the head down! The chief's a damn liar!
No warrant no entry. In that case it should be considered a home invasion and dealt with as such.
BE,KNOW, DO. Something I learned in the military.
If you didn't have a warrent then why are you there.
They can go to a house without a warrant. The breaking in without more justification or warrent was where they failed.
You know why? Because 50% of the population in the US would literally let them in and let them do whatever they want. Half the people dont know their rights or if they actually have any living on the US. It happens more times than it doesn't. Half of the times people get pulled over they incriminate themselves.
no warrant keeps them from entering but she could have answered the door and talked to them outside but when your knowingly hiding your criminal kid thats only reason she didn't answer door and know she gets rewarded wtf
cops don't need a warrant to ring the bell ans talk to you only to enter when she refused to answer the door now the cops have motive cuz know they know she's hiding a minor who's wanted if a child is in danger or they think a fugitive and a threat they have right to enter all.could have been avoided if she answered the door doesn't have to let them in but she should answer the door but harboring a fugitive is a crime ans she should be charged as well
You mean why did they break in?
Didn't you watch the video?
In the last part, they explain it.
No warrant. No entry. Plain and simple.
Dewayne Smith it’s a home invasion
Probably couldn't obtain a warrent due to lack of evidence
No warrant, no entry...period
Who says crime doesn't pay?
no warrant no entry period
I agree the 7 mil should come out police pension from their pay check
So do i
Me 3!
Th tax payer foots the bill so the police have no incentive change their ways.
And the chief if he wants TO BACK HIS GANG UP!
🤦🏽♂️ no warrant.
It's their own body camera footage. If there's something the Chief thinks was cut out, he could just release the entire version.
The fact that the highest ranking cop in that city is backing that type of actions, PROVES that things will NOT get any better until WE THE PEOPLE stand against it.
Yeah, no warrant, no enter. The law!!
@@dontrustwhiteyevery1 THATS RIGHT --- MORE DUMB FUCKING COPS
Cops don't like it when a citizen knows their rights. They go ape caca crazy when they don't have the upper hand.
Doesn’t sound like the “Hot Pursuit” exception applies here at all. Cops can’t just go kicking doors in without a warrant. That is beyond not ok.
Of course they can kick your door in for no reason and face no repercussions. It’s called a union and qualified immunity!
@@benanders4412 so… the cops just happen to have locks on them????? hmm
exactly....thats why they got 7 million!!!!lol
The chief of police is full of it
Apparently that argument only holds water in public opinion, because her daughter was convicted of arson.
$7 million & a lifetime of PTSD !
No warrant, and they kicked in the door. No excuse for that.
Doesn't matter. You guys didn't have a warrant!!
@gunluvr22 the crime was a week old so in this case they needed a warrant.
@gunluvr22 None of those things were happening in this incident
@@ghostofreagan3181 the daughter was suspected of arson which is a felony. She had a felony warrant. If the police have reasonable suspicion that someone with a felony warrant is hiding within your house they do not need a search warrant. I'm not a cop or a lawyer, I work at a fucking factory and I know this shit. You have no excuse not to know the law
@@nocthemedic2951 Under non emergency circumstances can't a office enter your property. If they have reasonable grounds to suspect that you are hiding a suspect or conducting illegal activity in your home . They must obtain a warrant from a magistrate . Alright, listen to your own advice you dumb idiot.
@@richardgarcia2796 this girl fled from the cops and was wanted for arson. The police had every right to enter that building.
Well, that no warrant cost the taxpayers 7M. Congratulations!
DU YU NU HAO INSURANCE WORKS DUM DUM?
@@starkapoorz rest assured, the insurance company will make the money back through increased premiums
Karan Kapoor
Yes, I do.
FIRST, the insured person or organization pays a premium based on predicted risk of payout. When large payouts-say $7 million-happen, the predicted future risk rises.....and right along go the premiums taxpayers foot.
@@starkapoorz - Are you even from America? Your post makes me doubt, for one. And two, the insurance would be either through the town or county. And that bill will increase taxes in that specific town or county because premiums will rise. Therefore, the citizens of said town or county will be paying those increased taxes. Do you get it now?