The citizens of Santa Clara should actually sue the Police Pension Fund to get the $7M back and/or the individual policemen that did the Kick Door In without a warrant for a minor child.
Yup, chief is endangering all his cops & every other cop out there. It's obvious why they burst in a door & injured a woman. Their chief covers for criminal behavior.
The chief defending their actions tells us that their actions are part of the culture and totally normal in his eyes. One instance on video, wonder how many more instances not recorded or not made public.
@Ho Chi Wang yes the chief is gonna make the city lose millions of dollars for just for lawsuites under his watch and he will still defend his officers.
@100Above what are you talking about ? Lmao you know we live in the most expensive city in the united states the city has money trust me they're not worried about a little block revenue that's not nothing at all to them but legit a couple of cop cars, some drones , swat gear and so on 😂
The police chief should be dismissed instantly. Furthermore, he should be investigated. A person who would commit this type of crime once and show zero remorse has probably done it before.
If the insurance pays the settlement, then it should CANCEL them! I wonder how difficult it would be to get another insurer? Probably a little difficult after a jury awarded all that cash!! I wouldn’t cover those Tyrannical Bullies!!!
Crack heads like u say defund the police. Financially isn't the only way to defund police. Stop harassing the cops. Without them you'd be dead end of story. Without police you'd be dead
Take that money and leave get that money out of that state and others with money should allow that state to become slum state drive the price of ocean front property down to 20 dollars an acre
They need to come out of their retirement funds. That way, ALL cops will have skin in the game, and it might make the so-called good ones a bit less tolerant of the thugs since it will cost them money.
Better ... out of that years salary budget for big departments. Over two to five years for smaller agencies. Court administered so there can't be any "creative accounting".
IMHO: In the case of Police Misconduct. Any settlement reached for misconduct, a percentage 10%-50% should come directly from the officers involved. NOT to be paid to the victim’s but to the city as reimbursement. ** remove your emotions & think logically here ** If the officer has to pay the victim they will declare bankruptcy & tie it up in the courts. Let the city pay it out & require the city to go after the officers involved. This way the victim gets paid in full as soon as possible & the city has the means to go after the officer/s. ❗️ALSO❗️ WE have to make sure that any monies raised from crowdfunding for these officers go to a fund for victims of Police Misconduct and NOT to the officers directly!..Think Manson Law etc. Currently most if not all police are covered by Qualified Immunity which must end!!! & the damn police unions as well. Now think of your situation!!! If you couldn’t get fired & were not personally financially responsible for your misconduct, what would your field of work look like!?? Why do you think MOST/NOT ALL gov departments suck!?? You have to be stupid if you think giving them more money is the answer!!! NO ABSOLUTELY NOT!! Holding them accountable is the answer JUST LIKE YOU & ME!!! Do you agree or disagree??? Why!?? (Finally: You ever hear Police & Gov say if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about!?? Then WHY are the police & gov soooooooo against oversight & accountability!???🤔
Search warrants are for searching homes to look for evidence against you for a crime. They dont need a search warrant to enter your home if they arent going to search it. Duh.
Jeff Shoemaker, In my state if an ordinary person commits a home intrusion, I am entitled to assume that he is intending to use Deadly Force to kill me or my family. In my state, if you are trying to use Deadly Force to try to kill me, I GET TO KILL YOU BACK. And if the law enforcement tries to break into my home without a warrant, the they have no special powers or immunity. They are just like any other criminal trying to break in and kill me.
WRONG. The Chief ised right. As long as the cops were freshly following leads ofed evidence which haved been freshly discovered they cand go ined to anywhere, even to homes. Whened they do appeal that foolished settling ofed that case the cops will win. It ised a legal rule the US Supremed court has supported many many times before. I am only 15 and even I do know that law.
we can get our car impounded and arrested for not having paperwork. Do the whole job or no job at all. If ya'll had a warrant we wouldn't be out 7mil. Nice going Duey!
That chief has no business wearing a badge. They broke the law, they violated that woman's Constitutional rights, assaulted her, injured her. Those officers should be FIRED, and that chief should be fired if he won't resign.
Imagine “settling” for 7 mil, then going on TV and trying to defend that. Man the people of that city should absolutely be afraid of those cops. Every. Single. One.
The reason the city settled is not because they broke her leg (though that is an aggravating factor). The reason they settled is because the cops entered the home illegally by not having a warrant. That's a federal civil right violation.
Eh wrong...didn't need one. Active pursuit began again when they ID'd her on public property...they didn't record that so had to settle because there is no "proof" of identifying her.
because the city's insurance company made a decision to avoid a legal fight for the sake of cost-benefit analysis and/or the city counsel made a decision about optics. The woman allegedly admits she tripped and fell in the full video. She was obstructing the arrest of her daughter, which is a crime, after she was identified as started a fire cUdong $350,000 in damage at her school.
There is no "entire story to be told Chief": You entered her house, broke her ankle. This woman won and cost us $7M. You still defending your police thugs?
@@777Skeptic exactly! no warrent fine use your hot pursuit bs, were you persuing mom? nope you were pursuing a 15 year old, so why is mom who is in her own home cuffed and being removed to another location? The answer no good reason they do this so violently her ankle breaks oh but she said it was an accident ok show me that footage, body cam was off $7 million dollars please.
Yup that's messed up the city should replace that chief with someone who actually does their job, if they keep this chief around their bound to lose millions more.
No warranty. They didn't have to break that beautiful glass door. That was HER home. There had to be another way to resolve that issue w/o that bullshit going down. Police seem to think that violence with guns solves EVERYTHING. IT DOES NOT. THE 21ST CENTURY HAS BLOSSOMED INTO MUCH MORE THAN BLACK AND WHITE RULES ON PAPER. DIVERSE ISSUES AND PEOPLE REQUIRES A MORE DIVERSE TRAINING. MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES, DRUG CULTURES. OUR LAWS ARE OLD, AND METHODS ARE OUTDATED. NEW TIMES REQUIRE NEW TECH AND TRAINING. SEEMS LIKE LAW ENFORCEMENT WANNA BLAME KILLING PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY FEAR FOR THEIR LIVES. THEN IF YOUR INTELLIGENCE AND TRAINING CANT TEACH YOU TO TAZE INSTEAD OF TERRORIZING AND DOWN RIGHT KILLING. GET OUT OF IT. LET SOME NEW BLOOD INTO LAW ENFORCEMENT.
Worse! he's an enabler that allows officers under his command to knowingly violate the very laws they are payed to enforce. He needs to be investigated.
“They used minimal amount of force to break into her house without a warrant and caused an ankle break.” -what the chief meant to say. Also, even if she did trip herself and break her ankle it would not have happened if the cops were not breaking the law to get into her house without a warrant. Pretty disgusting.
No they dont, depending on the situation. Ill give you an example. Lets say the known criminal in the house was suspected of just shooting someone down the street in a store. The cops would be REQUIRED to enter the house to get them , providing they had reasonable suspsion the person was prestently in the house. There would be little information if additional people were in the house that could be victims, or potential victims. To pretend like real life is black and white would be foolish. While most of the time a warrent is arequired, there are extending cirumstances that allow cops to by pass that requirement in order to protect other citizens.@@randomdragononthestreet8943
What makes you think no exigent circumstances? Explain the entire encounter and case to me. You cant tell that from the smal clip that was shown in this news story. Its an assumption you are just jumping too without full context of the entire situation.
You right, sure they try to cover their butts after the fact, but the city saw that they had no leg to stand on. Momma won the lottery there. 99 times out of 100, the police get away with breaking the law, so that is what the settlement really reflects.
Don't hope, make it happen. Form groups, generate funds to fight police corruption and ineptitude. Make time in your life to be proactive. Hoping and wishing isn't going to make these problems vanish.
@@mdsuavejr if this case happened or didn't happen, the police department pays the same amount to the insurance. That's how insurance works. This 7 mil came entirely from a private company dude
The part that was left out should have been recorded by police body cams. They know they got caught dirty and are using the age old tactics of bullies everywhere and blame the victim
When the police chief defends it and says the officers did nothing wrong, he's saying it will happen again. And why wouldn't it? - they believe they did nothing wrong.
Chief is a scumbag. "She slipped." Yea, due to the force of the officers. That would not of even happened if they were to follow the law and not break into her house without a warrant.
@@nick22279 yea except they didn't have one lol, she just said at the end of the video how the cops tried to bend the law to get around that fact though. It cost the city 7 MIL and now the guys pissed cause he couldn't work the system in his favor. Everyone involved in this debacle should be fired for costing the tax payers so much god damn money. She's a teenager, she can't hide in her moms house forever.
@@nick22279 they didn't have an arrest warrant. They were on a case and they suspected her daughter. They need an arrest warrant if they suspect them and intend to take them in for questioning.
Apprehension of an arsonist would have been a job for the Kripo (criminal police), not the Gestapo (secret state police), but their methods would have been the same as the ones used by the Santa Clara police.
The chief says that they cut the video short and didn't show the part where she said it was an accident. Well, from the looks of the video, I'd say it came from the cops bodycam so why doesn't he show the rest of the video.
A judge did that in Florida here , he revoked immunity from prosection and the court took his bank account his vehicles and his house to pay the victim back if that was done nation wide we would get our respect back and this would stop
Thanks it does not matter you would still have to get a warrant to enter a premises under constitutional rights millionaires do the same move and we could not get them without warrants or articulated reasonable suspicion what's there was none
I think when you have been identified outside.. It is considered as a hot pursuit and not needing a warrant.. I am not 100% sure but I think I read this somewhere.
@@adrianlapaz5505 you have to see them commit a crime and flee at that time the crime that was being suspected was a week old so they kicked in the door for a week old crime with no warrant
@@JonnyQuest64 nope,they just assumed it..and all they had to do was stay there while someone gets a warrant..but they would rather do it the expensive way.
@@ghostofreagan3181 the daughter was suspected of arson which is a felony. She had a felony warrant. If the police have reasonable suspicion that someone with a felony warrant is hiding within your house they do not need a search warrant. I'm not a cop or a lawyer, I work at a fucking factory and I know this shit. You have no excuse not to know the law
@@nocthemedic2951 Under non emergency circumstances can't a office enter your property. If they have reasonable grounds to suspect that you are hiding a suspect or conducting illegal activity in your home . They must obtain a warrant from a magistrate . Alright, listen to your own advice you dumb idiot.
@@Jetsetfastfood I don't know if that's accurate but I am on the side of the police cheif. A warrant is not required to go inside a home to arrest someone, as long as there is reasonable suspision that the person is isn't. The fact that he lives there is all they need to bust down that door and make an arrest.
@@Moose300 When the police break down your door without following the legal protections we have as free citizens it's too late. At that point America is over.
@@Jetsetfastfood When you prevent police from entering your home to arrest someone for arson, you deserve to be arrested too. Please tell me how it's illegal for police to enter a home to arrest that kid when they know he's inside. An officer can arrest someone when they know where the suspect is. An arrest warrant can be issued to let any police officer that encounters that person that they should be placed under arrest, it is not needed to go into a house to make an arrest. A search warrant is often needed to go into a home, however that's just for searching a home. If the police arrested the kid and then searched his closest for evidence to what he did, that would be illegal without a warrant or reasonable suspision.
After the George Floyd case, I've spent the last two days on RUclips watching these kinds of videos. There are hundreds of them exposing police crimes. Any average person would be arrested for these crimes. Why aren't the police arrested?
And for that reason I support some of the rioting But they should focus on the specific cops that fucked up The entire riot group should focus on 1 bad cop at a time
“After my officers cut their cameras, they told me she confessed to the whole thing being her fault so 🤨….” Yeah. Right. Also, grabbing someone and pulling them so that they trip and fall to the ground is another way of saying they were thrown to the ground, in my opinion.
If it happened when she was resisting arrest and protecting her daughter and not allowing entry to the housr while police had a warrant id say she was responsible for her own injury but with police not having kz she was within her rights to deny them entry and police officers are at fault so yep
The fact that the highest ranking cop in that city is backing that type of actions, PROVES that things will NOT get any better until WE THE PEOPLE stand against it.
Bottom line is you have no authority to enter so everything after that is illegal. It’s sad when the leaders condone this type of behaviour. Look I was a cop for thirty five years. In a case like this a phone call to the parents to bring the daughter down to the office is the way to go. We called it, dial a pinch .
Thanks Ironhorse! I'm pretty sure that would break that blue line pretty quickly. It's easy enough to toe the line when costs nothing, but with skin (or cash) in the game that's a different story.
Old Gregg You are wronged. Hot pursuit ised a ecxeption and the supremed court does defined hot pursuit as freshly following ofed leads ofed evidenced continuously to the location ofed the bad guy too. And the age ofed the crime means nothing. It coulded be a bank robbery fromed 10 years ago and just they discovered evidenced toay which thened leded them to more evidence which leded to eventually the bad guy ined a continuous line. The important ofed parts are that they did finded fresh evidence they did not haved before and thened that evidence did lead them continuously alonged a trail to the bad guy. That ised evened taught ined laws school ined college. Exigent ofed circumstances are NOT required fore each case. Only that they did finded new evidence that led alonged a trail to the bad guy. I do supposed you could say it that there ised exigent circumstance that the bad guy cand get away ifed not grabbed right to then OR evidence could geted destroyed. Sinced we do not know it ifed there were being others evidence whiched could geted destroyed we cand not decide ond that. Only you cand go ond what does the supremed court says is OK fore doing.
Old Gregg You are titled to your ownd opinion but you are wrong. Ifed the evidenced does lead to others evidence ined a continuoused chain and that chain does to lead to suspected persons just that does maked a credibled line ofed evidenced. Ifed only they did find one singled clue yours opinion woulded to be right, but as I did to say, it doesed haved to be a continuoused line ofed evidences that does lead toa bad guy. My fosters father I do haved now was a sheriff fore very a long ofed time and his ined service schools legals updates ised what did I geted it fromed and I did too evened talked to the college guy that did teached it. He was a attorney and was too a FBI dude fore a while and then geted to be a teacher. And I amed not making laws, that ised interpreting ofed it and the supreme court did supported it. And at least I amed not a stucked uped jerked off and at ofed least I haved studyed laws. Just but I do guessed you must be a judge fore 50 years withed all yours perfect ofed armed chairs legals OPINIONED. I may ofed be 15 only but at least I haved takened timed to read abouted it. And judges are NOT impartials partys, totally impartiality ised IMPOSSIBLE, they are representations ofed a common ordinary intelligent citizen. And you thinked you know the laws? Huh. And THAT does come from a branch 1 circuit court judge too even. Oh and I writed as this because I geted the shit beat out ofed me by a vile fosters father and I geted a TBI. So now you do not haved to maked fun ofed me neither! Good bye.
The officers used the “fresh or hot pursuit” exception for a crime allegedly committed a week earlier. Translation: police cost Santa Clara $7 mil ‘cause they broke the damn law!
That does not look like minimal force. No one stopped. N $7 million says it all and no warrant is all just illegal. And the officer trying to justify that is just appalling. Nothing in this video that the cops did right
No he does not...the daughter committed a crime found guilty....the mother should have turned her "No Good Daughter" into the police b4 they come to her door....I HOPE THE POLICE FILE AGAINST GIVING A MOTHER WITH A CRIMINAL DAUGHTER 7 MILLION...for what committing a crime... LOL THATS FUNNY SHIT
@@doratiscareno5856 he most definitely does need to be fired because now the city is out 7 million because his cops dont know how to follow the law themselves. No warrant no enter. Now the criminal they were trying to stop got paid. Yea that's a good chief alright.
@@Hood.Housekeeping Do you NOT GET...HER DAUGHTER IS A CRIMINAL NON OF THIS WOULD OF HAPPEND....TURN YR DAUGHTER IN...THEY WOULD "HAVE NEVER HAD TO COME AND GET HER" SHE ADMITS IT WAS AN ACCIDENT WHEN SHE FELL ...PUT OUT THE WHOLE TAPE
You know why? Because 50% of the population in the US would literally let them in and let them do whatever they want. Half the people dont know their rights or if they actually have any living on the US. It happens more times than it doesn't. Half of the times people get pulled over they incriminate themselves.
no warrant keeps them from entering but she could have answered the door and talked to them outside but when your knowingly hiding your criminal kid thats only reason she didn't answer door and know she gets rewarded wtf
cops don't need a warrant to ring the bell ans talk to you only to enter when she refused to answer the door now the cops have motive cuz know they know she's hiding a minor who's wanted if a child is in danger or they think a fugitive and a threat they have right to enter all.could have been avoided if she answered the door doesn't have to let them in but she should answer the door but harboring a fugitive is a crime ans she should be charged as well
Karan Kapoor Yes, I do. FIRST, the insured person or organization pays a premium based on predicted risk of payout. When large payouts-say $7 million-happen, the predicted future risk rises.....and right along go the premiums taxpayers foot.
@@Sneakydilbert - Are you even from America? Your post makes me doubt, for one. And two, the insurance would be either through the town or county. And that bill will increase taxes in that specific town or county because premiums will rise. Therefore, the citizens of said town or county will be paying those increased taxes. Do you get it now?
Yes, that is the real question here, and by a reporter who knows the law well enough to follow up on the "hot pursuit" claim / criteria. Until and unless media actually hold officers and departments accountable, these kinds of claims will continue to go unchallenged except behind closed doors in an administrative office or, at best, in a courtroom somewhere that few pay attention to. Serious doubts about not following the law need to be addressed openly, in front of the public, so that they know exactly what is being done by someone in authority. The insurance companies know where things are likely to fall, and how much it is going to cost, if challenged. They don't just pay out millions because they can't think of anything better to do.
I think he was, they just chose to narrate that part instead. But I agree it would be more informative to the public for the chief to state his illogical position and try to defend a policy of raiding someone's house for a crime that's a week old because it makes the officers' jobs easier, regardless of the 4th amendment. The chief's defense of these policies should offend all citizens.
Fresh Pursuit. Pursuit (with or without a warrant) for the purpose of preventing the escape or effecting the arrest of any person who is suspected of committing, or having committed, a misdemeanor or felony. Fresh pursuit implies pursuit without unreasonable delay, but need not be immediate pursuit. straight from google, surprising no one's talking about how the mom tried to defend an arsonist, and supposedly said it was an accident before the video ended. Pick your battles guys
The chief says his officers were acting in 'good faith'. 'Good faith' is when you smash into people's home without a warrant, and brutalizing them in the process. The chief and his hooligan colleagues should be hanged.
If this is 'minimal force', then I'd like to see what the chief thinks is excessive. When cops are found liable they should pay a portion of the settlement, not the taxpayers.
They should pay ALL the costs. As well as a prosecution for assault and battery with grievous bodily harm as well as armed home invasion. "Hot Pursuit" after a week? This is why the insurance company forked over the cash- it could have been more at a jury trial.
The police body cam “conveniently stopped” just prior to the woman saying it was an accident? The police video? Seems like the chief “conveniently created” an implausible defense.
It doesn't matter if it was an "accident". What matters is the "accident" wouldn't have happened if the police didn't become criminals and illegally break into her house. If they had a search warrant, then the lady might have let them in according to this. Having no warrants and breaking into the home is a crime, especially when the owner says no. It doesn't matter who the police think is inside. They have to have a warrant. So the insurance payout that the chief was upset about is the insurance company seeing no way out of paying. People need to understand their rights. Many times police don't and they break your rights all the time.
Chief, you insurance company settled because your team was wrong and you were going to lose. Her leg would not have been broken but for the fact you officers entered her home without a warrant and put their hands on her.
Drain the swamp…If that police chief thinks it ok to enter someone’s house without a warrant on a case that was a week old…then there’s no hope for any of us.
The lying thug Chief missed crucial points too, the fact that she was fine until the thugs showed up. He then lied about exigent circumstances. Fire the whole department.
How do you know he lied. I am inventing a situation because I don't know what happened now. But what if the suspect had been hard to find and they just saw her entering the home? My point is that you are making a lot of assumptions. The biggest of which is that the officer is lying. The Chief is also presumed innocent until proven guilty. All the Chief wants is for there to be a trial.
That police chief cost his city millions of dollars and instead of admitting and dealing with the problem, he maintains that it's the fault of the woman, the jury, and an insurance company. In other words: it's everyone else's fault. Those officers, of course, will do the same thing again.
Your entirely correct! I’ve seen this behavior before! The complete denial of all that is so they can be right! Kind of reflects the United States of America?
"the video is missing a crucial part". Yeah, the serving of a warrant! Just like robbing someone that results in death is then a murder, anything that happens after the police illegally entered her home is THEIR legal responsibility!
@@aussiepatriotprepper5206 They'd be serving bacon in hell. Oh, and she'd probably get convicted of murder, because the courts are practically coerced into supporting the police 90% of the time. When it's a choice between a police strike and one more innocent in prison, you know which the judge is gonna choose.
Mike Sellers is a terrible chief. I'm not sure it can get much lower than this. All the officers needed to do was get a warrant and do their job. Instead, they chose wrong. Good for the woman getting paid. It really sucks her leg was broken and she'll never walk right again.
That $7 million should come from Police pension fund instead of tax payer money.
👏🏼👏🏼And it should!
The citizens of Santa Clara should actually sue the Police Pension Fund to get the $7M back and/or the individual policemen that did the Kick Door In without a warrant for a minor child.
I agree makes no sense to take it from their victims.
Yeah. True!
More specifically, it should come from that police chief's pension.
That chief defending their actions infuriates me. He is the reason the injustice took place and needs to be held accountable
Thugs learn from thugs and their boss is a liar and a thug.
They always do this.
Yup, chief is endangering all his cops & every other cop out there. It's obvious why they burst in a door & injured a woman. Their chief covers for criminal behavior.
Chief corrupt to the core! He should be removed and jailed with the other criminals.
The chief defending their actions tells us that their actions are part of the culture and totally normal in his eyes.
One instance on video, wonder how many more instances not recorded or not made public.
They had no warrant, therefore they’re liable for all damages after they’ve illegally entered her home. Period.
In a moral world
@@richiejohnson in a moral world, there would be no entry without proper paperwork.
Within policy….They could have gotten a warrant, the crime was a week old…another day to procure a warrant was not unreasonable.
I agree completely
Unfortunately, it's the taxpayers who are liable.
This 7 million payout needs to come directly and only from the department involved
Fire the chief immediately
An update for anyone who cares, Santa Clara PD has a new chief as of 2020.
Thank you
This is good news. Just what I wanted to hear.
Another corrupt pig I'm sure
That is not enough. He should also be charge for protecting an assault. And have a big cut in his pension! They always retire like that! Too easy!
Don't worry, I'm sure he will abuse the rights of citizens in another location.
Looks like the chief needs to be under investigation as well
I completely agree. Make a phone call and tell them this is uncalled for
No unnecessary force. Looooooool
Investigate the assholes
Broke a leg him too
@Ho Chi Wang yes the chief is gonna make the city lose millions of dollars for just for lawsuites under his watch and he will still defend his officers.
He kicked the door in without a warrant and the chief thinks that’s ok. Unbelievable.
This Chief is the problem. Glad she won 7 million.
This should be mainstream news. Cops do this shit everywhere.
And he lied about the "hot pursuit" claim....a WEEK later is NOT in hot pursuit! They lie to justify.
@100Above what are you talking about ? Lmao you know we live in the most expensive city in the united states the city has money trust me they're not worried about a little block revenue that's not nothing at all to them but legit a couple of cop cars, some drones , swat gear and so on 😂
@@harryhanna8388It came from The tax payers. The police department didn't lose a dime.
If there’s no warrant, there’s no entry.
@@ernesttrosmanreal funny lil 👦
The police chief should be dismissed instantly. Furthermore, he should be investigated. A person who would commit this type of crime once and show zero remorse has probably done it before.
AND: will do it again!
That police chief must be in rest permanently
What should happen to the arson?
@@jimmyb1844 Whaaaaaat?
Absolutely right. Qualified immunity will SAVE them all. For Everything.
Imagine how disappointed the chief would be if, instead of the insurance carrier, he and the officers had to pay the 6.7 mil.
The gun in his holster would come to good use after the news . One bullet is all it takes
It should come out of their budget, at least!
If the insurance pays the settlement, then it should CANCEL them! I wonder how difficult it would be to get another insurer? Probably a little difficult after a jury awarded all that cash!! I wouldn’t cover those Tyrannical Bullies!!!
Crack heads like u say defund the police. Financially isn't the only way to defund police. Stop harassing the cops. Without them you'd be dead end of story. Without police you'd be dead
Sad part is they would still force entry
They forced entry without a warrant. They weren’t in “hot pursuit”. They should face criminal charges of breaking and entering and assault and battery
not to mention a great way to get the case thrown out. and frankly after that i would enter a motion for change of venue.
👍
@Jo Mrtz Mentally and morally bankrupt NPC's and even worse training
@Pumpkinhead Pumkinhead I heard the judge made him her butler
Make their whole life public so we can see if those cops are still criminals
“We investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong “….
"my officer used a minimum amount of force". Well they werent allowed to use any force, they didnt have a warrant
If that's minimun afraid to imagine what a maximum force be like!
Take that money and leave get that money out of that state and others with money should allow that state to become slum state drive the price of ocean front property down to 20 dollars an acre
@Jim Asimenios I hope your where kidding! They have needed a warrant since the signing of the 4th amendment.
@@jamesamonett9302 he was being facetious.
@@jamesamonett9302 4th doesn't mean what it used to, post Patriot Act
Lawsuits need to start coming out of police department’s budgets.
They need to come out of their retirement funds. That way, ALL cops will have skin in the game, and it might make the so-called good ones a bit less tolerant of the thugs since it will cost them money.
END QUALIFIED IMMUNITY!!!👍🏽
Better ... out of that years salary budget for big departments. Over two to five years for smaller agencies. Court administered so there can't be any "creative accounting".
Their budget comes from tax payers. So they dont lose any money. Take it straight from the cops paychecks and pension fund.
IMHO:
In the case of Police Misconduct. Any settlement reached for misconduct, a percentage 10%-50% should come directly from the officers involved.
NOT to be paid to the victim’s but to the city as reimbursement.
** remove your emotions & think logically here **
If the officer has to pay the victim they will declare bankruptcy & tie it up in the courts.
Let the city pay it out & require the city to go after the officers involved.
This way the victim gets paid in full as soon as possible & the city has the means to go after the officer/s.
❗️ALSO❗️ WE have to make sure that any monies raised from crowdfunding for these officers go to a fund for victims of Police Misconduct and NOT to the officers directly!..Think Manson Law etc.
Currently most if not all police are covered by Qualified Immunity which must end!!! & the damn police unions as well.
Now think of your situation!!!
If you couldn’t get fired & were not personally financially responsible for your misconduct, what would your field of work look like!??
Why do you think MOST/NOT ALL gov departments suck!??
You have to be stupid if you think giving them more money is the answer!!!
NO ABSOLUTELY NOT!!
Holding them accountable is the answer JUST LIKE YOU & ME!!!
Do you agree or disagree???
Why!??
(Finally: You ever hear Police & Gov say if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about!??
Then WHY are the police & gov soooooooo against oversight & accountability!???🤔
If a police chief doesn’t realize they need a search warrant then I’m fairly positive he needs a new job.
Search warrants are for searching homes to look for evidence against you for a crime. They dont need a search warrant to enter your home if they arent going to search it. Duh.
Yes, and that job should be OUTSIDE of law enforcement.
Yeah like maybe a news paper route. Or cleaning bathrooms in a county jail. Tyrants
If he doesn't understand that he needs locked up
this is california. they do whatever pops up in their 2 brain cells
The Chief needs to be imprisoned for life. There is no exigent circumstance to allow entry.
No warrant. That was breaking and entering with assault sanctioned by the chief. Shut down the department.
Jeff Shoemaker they settled with such a high amount so she wouldn't
Jeff Shoemaker,
In my state if an ordinary person commits a home intrusion,
I am entitled to assume that he is intending to use Deadly Force to kill me or my family.
In my state, if you are trying to use Deadly Force to try to kill me,
I GET TO KILL YOU BACK.
And if the law enforcement tries to break into my home without a warrant,
the they have no special powers or immunity.
They are just like any other criminal trying to break in and kill me.
Glenn Billings what state I want to move there
alex c,
those laws against home intrusion exist in any state that recognizes the Castle Doctrine.
WRONG. The Chief ised right. As long as the cops were freshly following leads ofed evidence which haved been freshly discovered they cand go ined to anywhere, even to homes. Whened they do appeal that foolished settling ofed that case the cops will win. It ised a legal rule the US Supremed court has supported many many times before. I am only 15 and even I do know that law.
No warrant, no entry. They should've had their paperwork in order before the decided to break the door.
nicky pass stfu
I wanna know how does someone slip on a dry piece of concrete??? this mans acting like this happened in a snow state during winter lul
we can get our car impounded and arrested for not having paperwork. Do the whole job or no job at all. If ya'll had a warrant we wouldn't be out 7mil. Nice going Duey!
Police don't need a warrant to arrest a criminal they need a warrant they want to search your house and they don't know if you did anything wrong
@@jlucky11 what happened to innocent until proven guilty in a court of law?
“We did everything by book.” “Where’s the warrant?” “YOUR UNDER ARREST FOR OBSTRUCTING MY INJUSTICE!”
That chief has no business wearing a badge. They broke the law, they violated that woman's Constitutional rights, assaulted her, injured her. Those officers should be FIRED, and that chief should be fired if he won't resign.
And all charged
And all certifications canceled.
End Qualified Immunity and start holding law enforcement officers accountable for their criminal actions and lying. Jail Time!
Imagine “settling” for 7 mil, then going on TV and trying to defend that. Man the people of that city should absolutely be afraid of those cops. Every. Single. One.
"We had no warrant. We had no good camera angles. We've investigated ourselves and the woman is lying that we broke her ankle or the law."
"Minimal force" in entering a home without a warrant? How can he defend his officers in using any force in this?
Makes me wonder what maximum force could have been like? 😲
Fire the chief he is the problem with that department.
get the mayor money to
shahriar iran exactly
Fire? Do you mean like to burn him in a public fire? Like burning witches? 😂😂
The reason the city settled is not because they broke her leg (though that is an aggravating factor). The reason they settled is because the cops entered the home illegally by not having a warrant. That's a federal civil right violation.
And that is inexcusable. Unfortunately, the more powerful the government...the more of this you will get. Free isn't free
Eh wrong...didn't need one. Active pursuit began again when they ID'd her on public property...they didn't record that so had to settle because there is no "proof" of identifying her.
That's why they paid 7 million dollars ..cause they were right ?!
At the time of entry the person was only a suspect. I don't see how that gives the cops the right to enter the house.
tartredarrow
mom should be arrested for aiding her daughter when she wouldn’t let the police in to arrest her criminal daughter
If that is true that "they acted within the Law" Then how did the woman get 7 million dollars?
Because they had no right to enter the home without a warrant.
It's police logic lol !!!!
They didn't
because the city's insurance company made a decision to avoid a legal fight for the sake of cost-benefit analysis and/or the city counsel made a decision about optics.
The woman allegedly admits she tripped and fell in the full video. She was obstructing the arrest of her daughter, which is a crime, after she was identified as started a fire cUdong $350,000 in damage at her school.
It is nice to see criminals to get compensated.
Losing $1.3 BILLION in lawsuit payouts annually and still they insist they're good at their jobs. 😅
There is no "entire story to be told Chief": You entered her house, broke her ankle. This woman won and cost us $7M. You still defending your police thugs?
Maybe they should wear body cameras if they want the entire story told.... oh wait
@@MegTelevised FACTS!!
His men entered the house without a warrant, yet he wants to focus on how this was an accident... an accident his men caused.
@@777Skeptic exactly! no warrent fine use your hot pursuit bs, were you persuing mom? nope you were pursuing a 15 year old, so why is mom who is in her own home cuffed and being removed to another location? The answer no good reason they do this so violently her ankle breaks oh but she said it was an accident ok show me that footage, body cam was off $7 million dollars please.
Yup that's messed up the city should replace that chief with someone who actually does their job, if they keep this chief around their bound to lose millions more.
They break into a person's home without a warrant and their response is that they are upset that the insurance company settled. Unreal.
Victimhood at its finest
Crazyyyyyy
No warranty. They didn't have to break that beautiful glass door. That was HER home. There had to be another way to resolve that issue w/o that bullshit going down. Police seem to think that violence with guns solves EVERYTHING. IT DOES NOT. THE 21ST CENTURY HAS BLOSSOMED INTO MUCH MORE THAN BLACK AND WHITE RULES ON PAPER. DIVERSE ISSUES AND PEOPLE REQUIRES A MORE DIVERSE TRAINING. MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES, DRUG CULTURES. OUR LAWS ARE OLD, AND METHODS ARE OUTDATED. NEW TIMES REQUIRE NEW TECH AND TRAINING. SEEMS LIKE LAW ENFORCEMENT WANNA BLAME KILLING PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY FEAR FOR THEIR LIVES. THEN IF YOUR INTELLIGENCE AND TRAINING CANT TEACH YOU TO TAZE INSTEAD OF TERRORIZING AND DOWN RIGHT KILLING. GET OUT OF IT. LET SOME NEW BLOOD INTO LAW ENFORCEMENT.
@@sheliabattle1129 The daughter was an arsonist, why are you worried about her door?
Is the chief a liar or just stupid? Either way he should be fired.
Both LOL!🤣
Both 😂😂😂
Worse! he's an enabler that allows officers under his command to knowingly violate the very laws they are payed to enforce. He needs to be investigated.
Stupid liar
Both !!
But they didn’t have a warrant. How does he stand by them?
He's a cuck.
Chief: It stopped right before she said it was her fault
Ummmmm you guys were recording
Lmao!!!
Ya it was police body cams so who released the video
What there body cams just stopped working? It was their video & he says it stopped to shortly like there was a film crew there.
More likely "it conveniently stopped" just before the Cop probably said it was their fault !
Hahahaha, they stopped recording because they didn’t want people to see what really happened I guess. Really good point.
“They used minimal amount of force to break into her house without a warrant and caused an ankle break.” -what the chief meant to say. Also, even if she did trip herself and break her ankle it would not have happened if the cops were not breaking the law to get into her house without a warrant. Pretty disgusting.
Don't need a warrant when you harbor a known criminal.
Yes they do…
Sounds like it was a legal entry to arrest the young woman that tried to burn down the high school.
No they dont, depending on the situation. Ill give you an example. Lets say the known criminal in the house was suspected of just shooting someone down the street in a store. The cops would be REQUIRED to enter the house to get them , providing they had reasonable suspsion the person was prestently in the house. There would be little information if additional people were in the house that could be victims, or potential victims. To pretend like real life is black and white would be foolish. While most of the time a warrent is arequired, there are extending cirumstances that allow cops to by pass that requirement in order to protect other citizens.@@randomdragononthestreet8943
They had no warrant nor exigent circumstances. Shameful.
What makes you think no exigent circumstances? Explain the entire encounter and case to me. You cant tell that from the smal clip that was shown in this news story. Its an assumption you are just jumping too without full context of the entire situation.
@@cunderwood2323so you're defending the @sshole?
You right, sure they try to cover their butts after the fact, but the city saw that they had no leg to stand on. Momma won the lottery there. 99 times out of 100, the police get away with breaking the law, so that is what the settlement really reflects.
@@cunderwood2323shew dude
@@cunderwood2323 Sounds like the had plenty of time to go get a warrant. If they knew where the suspect was and her name.
I hope one day the police will be accountable.
Don't hope, make it happen. Form groups, generate funds to fight police corruption and ineptitude. Make time in your life to be proactive. Hoping and wishing isn't going to make these problems vanish.
Taxpayer paid for that $7M. It should be deducted to the salaries of these police and officer who ordered this mistake.
M.D. Suave the police chief should work for free after letting all that horse shit come out his mouth
They should be fired
It actually came from an Insurance company if you were listening
@@habibbialikafe339. Who is paying for the insurance?
@@mdsuavejr if this case happened or didn't happen, the police department pays the same amount to the insurance. That's how insurance works. This 7 mil came entirely from a private company dude
This guy is smirking while he's lying, how's he even still have a job
A high paying job position with a solid pension.
BECAUSE THE ENTIRE SYSTEM IS CORRUPT!
Did he seriously complain about a bodycam being "conveniently stopped"?
YES HE DID ---- THAT PROVES HE IS AN IDIOT -- NOTHING MORE.
Came here just for this comment.
Exactly
Let’s not forget it was the officer’s body camera that was “conveniently stopped.”
chief should be fired too.
The part that was left out should have been recorded by police body cams. They know they got caught dirty and are using the age old tactics of bullies everywhere and blame the victim
When the police chief defends it and says the officers did nothing wrong, he's saying it will happen again. And why wouldn't it? - they believe they did nothing wrong.
Dan Stewart; when are they ever wrong?, & they get fire to go to another department
If anybody loses their job, it should start with him.
@@angelsimmons5384 because it’s not coming from his pension
Jury of 12 said otherwise.
The fish stinks from the head down! The chief's a damn liar!
Chief is a scumbag. "She slipped." Yea, due to the force of the officers. That would not of even happened if they were to follow the law and not break into her house without a warrant.
Girls
I wanna know how does someone slip on a dry piece of concrete??? this mans acting like this happened in a snow state during winter lul
A police officer does not need a search warrant to enter the registered domicile of a suspect if they have an arrest warrant.
@@nick22279 yea except they didn't have one lol, she just said at the end of the video how the cops tried to bend the law to get around that fact though. It cost the city 7 MIL and now the guys pissed cause he couldn't work the system in his favor. Everyone involved in this debacle should be fired for costing the tax payers so much god damn money. She's a teenager, she can't hide in her moms house forever.
@@nick22279 they didn't have an arrest warrant. They were on a case and they suspected her daughter. They need an arrest warrant if they suspect them and intend to take them in for questioning.
Those aren't cops, they're SS soldiers of the American Gestapo.
Apprehension of an arsonist would have been a job for the Kripo (criminal police), not the Gestapo (secret state police), but their methods would have been the same as the ones used by the Santa Clara police.
@@terrythomas8486german ss: show me your papers = murican ss: show your id, stop resisting.
well said. Never talk to cops. They are the first to lie to you. Per the SCOTUS.
We need to teardown lawenforcement in this country and start over
The chief says that they cut the video short and didn't show the part where she said it was an accident. Well, from the looks of the video, I'd say it came from the cops bodycam so why doesn't he show the rest of the video.
the crucial part of it, is they had no warrant.
And then try to justify it with a lie
No Warrant? No entry. Period! Officers should be arrested, charged and tried.
That tax money never runs out eh?
Time these cops start paying from their pockets.
Actually some cities are broke from paying out $$ to people their police forces have WRONGED.
A judge did that in Florida here , he revoked immunity from prosection and the court took his bank account his vehicles and his house to pay the victim back if that was done nation wide we would get our respect back and this would stop
Yes it should come out of their pension funds then they would pull their heads in.
Or the POCKETS OF THEIR UNION!
@@alvinwine5665 HELL YEAH!
Entering a residence without a warrant is not acting in good faith...Sorry Chief. You lose!
It does not matter if she said it was an accident as it only happened while the cops were illegally entering her home.
Why do we need THE WHOLE STORY?? Cops KICKED IN A DOOR, AND ENTERED PRIVATE PROPERTY, WITHOUT A WARRANT!!! What else do we need to know??
How about was she outside when they first identified her...in that case a warrant is not needed to pursue such individual.
Thanks it does not matter you would still have to get a warrant to enter a premises under constitutional rights millionaires do the same move and we could not get them without warrants or articulated reasonable suspicion what's there was none
I think when you have been identified outside.. It is considered as a hot pursuit and not needing a warrant.. I am not 100% sure but I think I read this somewhere.
@@adrianlapaz5505 you have to see them commit a crime and flee at that time the crime that was being suspected was a week old so they kicked in the door for a week old crime with no warrant
@@JonnyQuest64 nope,they just assumed it..and all they had to do was stay there while someone gets a warrant..but they would rather do it the expensive way.
The police investigated themselves and found no wrongdoing.
That the problem as well. Police investigate themselves with the police code. That says hell I don't care what you did, you it was lawful!
Chief wasn't there. Yes good faith. 7 million of good Faith!!!
Doesn’t sound like the “Hot Pursuit” exception applies here at all. Cops can’t just go kicking doors in without a warrant. That is beyond not ok.
Of course they can kick your door in for no reason and face no repercussions. It’s called a union and qualified immunity!
@@benanders4412 so… the cops just happen to have locks on them????? hmm
exactly....thats why they got 7 million!!!!lol
The chief of police is full of it
Apparently that argument only holds water in public opinion, because her daughter was convicted of arson.
Did the police call paramedics for the woman? If not they should be charged with assault fired and arrested!
Doesn't matter. You guys didn't have a warrant!!
@gunluvr22 the crime was a week old so in this case they needed a warrant.
@gunluvr22 None of those things were happening in this incident
@@ghostofreagan3181 the daughter was suspected of arson which is a felony. She had a felony warrant. If the police have reasonable suspicion that someone with a felony warrant is hiding within your house they do not need a search warrant. I'm not a cop or a lawyer, I work at a fucking factory and I know this shit. You have no excuse not to know the law
@@nocthemedic2951 Under non emergency circumstances can't a office enter your property. If they have reasonable grounds to suspect that you are hiding a suspect or conducting illegal activity in your home . They must obtain a warrant from a magistrate . Alright, listen to your own advice you dumb idiot.
@@richardgarcia2796 this girl fled from the cops and was wanted for arson. The police had every right to enter that building.
The video is missing a crucial part but she still got $7 million? Lmao chief, I guess the delusion starts from the top?
@@killmozzies Not the families, just the officer.
It's amazing how the body camera just happened to turn off at crucial parts huh bunch of bullshits what this is crooked ass cops
Chief has an unintelligent look about him, and he's a damn liar!
There’s an extended version but.... It just as bad and her admission was under duress... The brass in a lot of these departments are 🤡
I didn't know breaking someone's leg is considered "GOOD FAITH" he's dumber than he looks
Not surprising the cops acted like this when their boss is a dirty tyrant
You have to admit that the chief rocks a lot of pretty boy bling.
The missing part of the video was the warrant.
@@Jetsetfastfood I don't know if that's accurate but I am on the side of the police cheif. A warrant is not required to go inside a home to arrest someone, as long as there is reasonable suspision that the person is isn't. The fact that he lives there is all they need to bust down that door and make an arrest.
@@Moose300 When the police break down your door without following the legal protections we have as free citizens it's too late. At that point America is over.
@@Jetsetfastfood When you prevent police from entering your home to arrest someone for arson, you deserve to be arrested too.
Please tell me how it's illegal for police to enter a home to arrest that kid when they know he's inside.
An officer can arrest someone when they know where the suspect is.
An arrest warrant can be issued to let any police officer that encounters that person that they should be placed under arrest, it is not needed to go into a house to make an arrest.
A search warrant is often needed to go into a home, however that's just for searching a home. If the police arrested the kid and then searched his closest for evidence to what he did, that would be illegal without a warrant or reasonable suspision.
No warrant = illegal entry, they should be treated like common criminals.
After the George Floyd case, I've spent the last two days on RUclips watching these kinds of videos. There are hundreds of them exposing police crimes. Any average person would be arrested for these crimes. Why aren't the police arrested?
2 things, police union, and qualifad imunity
The FBI has a devison for this crimes call them in. Let them know.
And for that reason I support some of the rioting
But they should focus on the specific cops that fucked up
The entire riot group should focus on 1 bad cop at a time
Civil rights arn't considered particularly important stateside.
Thousands upon thousands of these vids. We could spend every day watching as many as we could and we'd never catch up, even if they stopped today.
“After my officers cut their cameras, they told me she confessed to the whole thing being her fault so 🤨….”
Yeah. Right. Also, grabbing someone and pulling them so that they trip and fall to the ground is another way of saying they were thrown to the ground, in my opinion.
Yeah, Right Mariah. The cops say it's all her fault for trying to protect her house from their ILLEGAl entry.
Exactly. For that Chief to say she admitted she slipped and fell is meaningless. She was put in that position by his a-hole gang.
@@donneary7104 well said.
If it happened when she was resisting arrest and protecting her daughter and not allowing entry to the housr while police had a warrant id say she was responsible for her own injury but with police not having kz she was within her rights to deny them entry and police officers are at fault so yep
It is police bodycam so they better proof it.
The should sue the chief for defamation
"They did nothing wrong. She tripped and fell simultaneously having an officers hands on her neck". WTF
What's amazing is that they didn't charge her with assaulting a cop.
Exactly
remember that the next time the police come kick your door down
@@melitonrodriguez7643 If the police come knocking on your door, you've fucked up.
@@Jianju69 sorry but no police will b knocking on my door not less they got wrong address and that leads to a big bank for me..
Stands behind officers who illegally entered home without a warrant. That should be the main story.
The fact that the highest ranking cop in that city is backing that type of actions, PROVES that things will NOT get any better until WE THE PEOPLE stand against it.
Yeah, no warrant, no enter. The law!!
@@dontrustwhiteyevery1 THATS RIGHT --- MORE DUMB FUCKING COPS
Cops don't like it when a citizen knows their rights. They go ape caca crazy when they don't have the upper hand.
So he stands by his officers illegally entering a citizen's property.
Did you really expect anything else from him? The corruption goes from the top all the way down.
Officers investigated officers and found officers did nothing wrong.
@Krypto Universe if you're talking about what I think you're no he doesn't.
He needs to be fired, lose his pension and jailed.
@@SupremeInvigilator Yup. Big surprise.
@@SupremeInvigilator but we have to pay always ....... :)
Seeing that chef defending his officers is pretty disgusting.
Chim Ritchelds
Chief not chef
Hey man- don't be stupid and type something you don't mean.
He should be a chef actually since he likes to harm innocent creatures
@@sgillman16 I agree that he is bad but I hope that you do not hate all meat eaters.
What an ignorant chief. Don’t enter people’s houses without a warrant.
This chief should fired and stripped of his retirement and the other"officérs" charged and imprisoned!!!!
Imagine defending somebody after they break an innocent persons leg without a warrant
I wish I worked for an employer where I can keep my job even after costing them 7 million dollars.
@Black Labs Matter that’s who their employer is.
That is hilarious! 👍
Bottom line is you have no authority to enter so everything after that is illegal. It’s sad when the leaders condone this type of behaviour. Look I was a cop for thirty five years. In a case like this a phone call to the parents to bring the daughter down to the office is the way to go. We called it, dial a pinch .
The funds to settle the lawsuit should be paid from the police officers' pension fund.
Broke Dick • No, then the wife and grandkids suffer :-o
Broke Dick best idea I’ve heard in a long time.
Thanks Ironhorse! I'm pretty sure that would break that blue line pretty quickly. It's easy enough to toe the line when costs nothing, but with skin (or cash) in the game that's a different story.
Old Gregg
You are wronged. Hot pursuit ised a ecxeption and the supremed court does defined hot pursuit as freshly following ofed leads ofed evidenced continuously to the location ofed the bad guy too. And the age ofed the crime means nothing. It coulded be a bank robbery fromed 10 years ago and just they discovered evidenced toay which thened leded them to more evidence which leded to eventually the bad guy ined a continuous line. The important ofed parts are that they did finded fresh evidence they did not haved before and thened that evidence did lead them continuously alonged a trail to the bad guy. That ised evened taught ined laws school ined college. Exigent ofed circumstances are NOT required fore each case. Only that they did finded new evidence that led alonged a trail to the bad guy. I do supposed you could say it that there ised exigent circumstance that the bad guy cand get away ifed not grabbed right to then OR evidence could geted destroyed. Sinced we do not know it ifed there were being others evidence whiched could geted destroyed we cand not decide ond that. Only you cand go ond what does the supremed court says is OK fore doing.
Old Gregg
You are titled to your ownd opinion but you are wrong. Ifed the evidenced does lead to others evidence ined a continuoused chain and that chain does to lead to suspected persons just that does maked a credibled line ofed evidenced. Ifed only they did find one singled clue yours opinion woulded to be right, but as I did to say, it doesed haved to be a continuoused line ofed evidences that does lead toa bad guy. My fosters father I do haved now was a sheriff fore very a long ofed time and his ined service schools legals updates ised what did I geted it fromed and I did too evened talked to the college guy that did teached it. He was a attorney and was too a FBI dude fore a while and then geted to be a teacher. And I amed not making laws, that ised interpreting ofed it and the supreme court did supported it. And at least I amed not a stucked uped jerked off and at ofed least I haved studyed laws. Just but I do guessed you must be a judge fore 50 years withed all yours perfect ofed armed chairs legals OPINIONED. I may ofed be 15 only but at least I haved takened timed to read abouted it.
And judges are NOT impartials partys, totally impartiality ised IMPOSSIBLE, they are representations ofed a common ordinary intelligent citizen. And you thinked you know the laws? Huh. And THAT does come from a branch 1 circuit court judge too even.
Oh and I writed as this because I geted the shit beat out ofed me by a vile fosters father and I geted a TBI. So now you do not haved to maked fun ofed me neither! Good bye.
The officers used the “fresh or hot pursuit” exception for a crime allegedly committed a week earlier. Translation: police cost Santa Clara $7 mil ‘cause they broke the damn law!
She should have been awarded $70 million. She stood her ground as a good mother and citizen.
@@jamesfrederick99 Stood her ground by protecting a felon?
"Hot pursuit"? when the whole thing is a week old? That's stone cold!
pretty moldy
A STONE COLD LIE!!! WHEN THE DA SAID IT WAS NOT HOT PURSUIT!
If that's a hot pursuit then God knows how long a stake out is...
Anal forcing their way in without a warrant? No way buddy.
Stone cold LIE
This chief needs to resign.
The part missing is where they do more lying about the warrant.
That does not look like minimal force. No one stopped.
N $7 million says it all and no warrant is all just illegal. And the officer trying to justify that is just appalling. Nothing in this video that the cops did right
The cop trying to justify it was the CHIEF!!
I wanna know how does someone slip on a dry piece of concrete??? this mans acting like this happened in a snow state during winter lul
The police chief needs to be fired.
No he does not...the daughter committed a crime found guilty....the mother should have turned her "No Good Daughter" into the police b4 they come to her door....I HOPE THE POLICE FILE AGAINST GIVING A MOTHER WITH A CRIMINAL DAUGHTER
7 MILLION...for what committing a crime...
LOL THATS FUNNY SHIT
@@doratiscareno5856 he most definitely does need to be fired because now the city is out 7 million because his cops dont know how to follow the law themselves. No warrant no enter. Now the criminal they were trying to stop got paid. Yea that's a good chief alright.
@@Hood.Housekeeping
Do you NOT GET...HER DAUGHTER IS A CRIMINAL
NON OF THIS WOULD OF HAPPEND....TURN YR DAUGHTER IN...THEY WOULD "HAVE NEVER HAD TO COME AND GET HER" SHE ADMITS IT WAS AN ACCIDENT WHEN SHE FELL ...PUT OUT THE WHOLE TAPE
@@Hood.Housekeeping
And you would HIDE YOUR DAUGHTER CORRECT
They can said anything they want.
No such thing as an honest cop ALL are rotten to the core!
If you didn't have a warrent then why are you there.
They can go to a house without a warrant. The breaking in without more justification or warrent was where they failed.
You know why? Because 50% of the population in the US would literally let them in and let them do whatever they want. Half the people dont know their rights or if they actually have any living on the US. It happens more times than it doesn't. Half of the times people get pulled over they incriminate themselves.
no warrant keeps them from entering but she could have answered the door and talked to them outside but when your knowingly hiding your criminal kid thats only reason she didn't answer door and know she gets rewarded wtf
cops don't need a warrant to ring the bell ans talk to you only to enter when she refused to answer the door now the cops have motive cuz know they know she's hiding a minor who's wanted if a child is in danger or they think a fugitive and a threat they have right to enter all.could have been avoided if she answered the door doesn't have to let them in but she should answer the door but harboring a fugitive is a crime ans she should be charged as well
You mean why did they break in?
Didn't you watch the video?
In the last part, they explain it.
entered the home with no warrant... where is justice going in america??
The attitude of the chief 🐷 tells you everything what’s wrong with cops...
Walid bahhur
Disgraceful of these cops & chief of police
Crooked boss equals crooked dept clear through.
Yup!!!!!
Reckless policing paid with taxpayers money? The cop should at least lost his pension and do jail time.
Well, that no warrant cost the taxpayers 7M. Congratulations!
DU YU NU HAO INSURANCE WORKS DUM DUM?
@@Sneakydilbert rest assured, the insurance company will make the money back through increased premiums
Karan Kapoor
Yes, I do.
FIRST, the insured person or organization pays a premium based on predicted risk of payout. When large payouts-say $7 million-happen, the predicted future risk rises.....and right along go the premiums taxpayers foot.
@@Sneakydilbert - Are you even from America? Your post makes me doubt, for one. And two, the insurance would be either through the town or county. And that bill will increase taxes in that specific town or county because premiums will rise. Therefore, the citizens of said town or county will be paying those increased taxes. Do you get it now?
So why wasn't the chief asked on camera about his officers not having a warrant?.
Yes, that is the real question here, and by a reporter who knows the law well enough to follow up on the "hot pursuit" claim / criteria. Until and unless media actually hold officers and departments accountable, these kinds of claims will continue to go unchallenged except behind closed doors in an administrative office or, at best, in a courtroom somewhere that few pay attention to. Serious doubts about not following the law need to be addressed openly, in front of the public, so that they know exactly what is being done by someone in authority. The insurance companies know where things are likely to fall, and how much it is going to cost, if challenged. They don't just pay out millions because they can't think of anything better to do.
Stupid journalists.
I think he was, they just chose to narrate that part instead. But I agree it would be more informative to the public for the chief to state his illogical position and try to defend a policy of raiding someone's house for a crime that's a week old because it makes the officers' jobs easier, regardless of the 4th amendment. The chief's defense of these policies should offend all citizens.
Fresh Pursuit. Pursuit (with or without a warrant) for the purpose of preventing the escape or effecting the arrest of any person who is suspected of committing, or having committed, a misdemeanor or felony. Fresh pursuit implies pursuit without unreasonable delay, but need not be immediate pursuit. straight from google, surprising no one's talking about how the mom tried to defend an arsonist, and supposedly said it was an accident before the video ended. Pick your battles guys
@@hiimbob77 This was not a "fresh pursuit", the incident happened a week earlier. Plenty of time to get a warrant.
The chief says his officers were acting in 'good faith'. 'Good faith' is when you smash into people's home without a warrant, and brutalizing them in the process. The chief and his hooligan colleagues should be hanged.
No warrant, no entry...period
If this is 'minimal force', then I'd like to see what the chief thinks is excessive.
When cops are found liable they should pay a portion of the settlement, not the taxpayers.
They should pay ALL the costs. As well as a prosecution for assault and battery with grievous bodily harm as well as armed home invasion. "Hot Pursuit" after a week? This is why the insurance company forked over the cash- it could have been more at a jury trial.
Let's take it to court and if they lose The Chief's Pension will payout
That would be a gun
criminals in uniform
He just said it was insurance the police have. It doesn’t come from the tax payers.
The police body cam “conveniently stopped” just prior to the woman saying it was an accident? The police video?
Seems like the chief “conveniently created” an implausible defense.
Right? If that's even true, whose fault is it that the recording stopped right before she said it was an accident? Certainly not hers!
Those cameras should on some type if I-cloud upload system once the police get back into their patrol cars. In other words no tampering
No Search Warrant just enter the house and beat up on a woman what a role model. Caught on camera. Where is the outrage so tragic....
If you meant to imply the Chief LIED, we all already knew that...He was talking!
What's with the quotation marks?
no warrant no entry period
It doesn't matter if it was an "accident". What matters is the "accident" wouldn't have happened if the police didn't become criminals and illegally break into her house. If they had a search warrant, then the lady might have let them in according to this. Having no warrants and breaking into the home is a crime, especially when the owner says no. It doesn't matter who the police think is inside. They have to have a warrant. So the insurance payout that the chief was upset about is the insurance company seeing no way out of paying. People need to understand their rights. Many times police don't and they break your rights all the time.
Chief, you insurance company settled because your team was wrong and you were going to lose. Her leg would not have been broken but for the fact you officers entered her home without a warrant and put their hands on her.
Drain the swamp…If that police chief thinks it ok to enter someone’s house without a warrant on a case that was a week old…then there’s no hope for any of us.
The lying thug Chief missed crucial points too, the fact that she was fine until the thugs showed up. He then lied about exigent circumstances. Fire the whole department.
DEFUND the whole department.. make all these PIGS jobless.. lets see...
And no pensions!
Wasn't the cops fault. She's just overweight and clumsy
How do you know he lied. I am inventing a situation because I don't know what happened now. But what if the suspect had been hard to find and they just saw her entering the home? My point is that you are making a lot of assumptions. The biggest of which is that the officer is lying. The Chief is also presumed innocent until proven guilty. All the Chief wants is for there to be a trial.
Defund police
The chief ignores the 7 million dollar payment.
We have investigated ourselves and found that we have done nothing wrong.
ASSS LIER
INVESTIGATIGATED
Gang activity is all I see
Investigated their selves 😂🤦
The Department and county need to be held accountable. NO WARRENT NO ACCESS !!!!
No urgency!!!!!!
That police chief cost his city millions of dollars and instead of admitting and dealing with the problem, he maintains that it's the fault of the woman, the jury, and an insurance company. In other words: it's everyone else's fault. Those officers, of course, will do the same thing again.
Your entirely correct! I’ve seen this behavior before! The complete denial of all that is so they can be right! Kind of reflects the United States of America?
arthurneddysmith that's what happens when you put senile old fucks in charge of policing
The crime was a week old? Officers absolutely should have had a warrant. As former LEO, these cops were wrong.
I agree the 7 mil should come out police pension from their pay check
So do i
Me 3!
Th tax payer foots the bill so the police have no incentive change their ways.
And the chief if he wants TO BACK HIS GANG UP!
"the video is missing a crucial part". Yeah, the serving of a warrant! Just like robbing someone that results in death is then a murder, anything that happens after the police illegally entered her home is THEIR legal responsibility!
Yeah, but the taxpayers foot the bill
I wonder what would happen if she let loose a barrage of bullets from an AR killing all the home invaders???
@@aussiepatriotprepper5206 They'd be serving bacon in hell.
Oh, and she'd probably get convicted of murder, because the courts are practically coerced into supporting the police 90% of the time. When it's a choice between a police strike and one more innocent in prison, you know which the judge is gonna choose.
he only said that since the city paid and they had union.. bitch.... best not to near this city...
Did she shoot one of them? That's all that would justify this brutality.
No warrant. No entry. Plain and simple.
Dewayne Smith it’s a home invasion
Probably couldn't obtain a warrent due to lack of evidence
Mike Sellers is a terrible chief. I'm not sure it can get much lower than this. All the officers needed to do was get a warrant and do their job. Instead, they chose wrong. Good for the woman getting paid. It really sucks her leg was broken and she'll never walk right again.