The song is an original called "Not Supposed To Know". It's available on Spotify and RUclips. The link is in the description. Thanks very much for the support and kind words.
Good food for thought, thanks! Ever heard of the idea of "God of the gaps"? That's where as science explained away things that previously people may have attributed to "acts of God", God was "pushed into a corner". We have a tendency to think a little bit like "Human of the gaps" - meaning that it claims "we are still human and valuable because at least there are SOME things that we can do better than AI". I would argue that both these lines of thinking are fallacies - the former because it is a misunderstanding as to the nature of God, and the latter because it is a misunderstanding as to the nature of humanity. God is not bound by space and time, and has always existed. Similarly, I would argue that humans are defined less by their properties and more by their calling (such as in the Creation Mandate), by their relationship (to their Creator), and their personhood (rather than their persona). Our vulnerability, empathy, authenticity, and creativity are good characteristics although AI is pretty good at at least emulating those.
Thank you so much for watching and leaving such a thoughtful comment. I have not heard of God of Gaps Theory. The idea that we are defined by what we do rather then what we are is very interesting and something i'll need to think about more. Thanks for sharing.
Holy heck Encarta 95!!! Memory unlocked 🤯 that Megabyte joke was killer 😄💕👏👍
PS- I kinda like AI Jack's face, like your evil robot twin
But he can’t feel feelings!
"horses will always beat cars"
What is the song at the end? Sounded good, the video was good too though
The song is an original called "Not Supposed To Know". It's available on Spotify and RUclips. The link is in the description. Thanks very much for the support and kind words.
Good food for thought, thanks! Ever heard of the idea of "God of the gaps"? That's where as science explained away things that previously people may have attributed to "acts of God", God was "pushed into a corner". We have a tendency to think a little bit like "Human of the gaps" - meaning that it claims "we are still human and valuable because at least there are SOME things that we can do better than AI".
I would argue that both these lines of thinking are fallacies - the former because it is a misunderstanding as to the nature of God, and the latter because it is a misunderstanding as to the nature of humanity.
God is not bound by space and time, and has always existed. Similarly, I would argue that humans are defined less by their properties and more by their calling (such as in the Creation Mandate), by their relationship (to their Creator), and their personhood (rather than their persona). Our vulnerability, empathy, authenticity, and creativity are good characteristics although AI is pretty good at at least emulating those.
Thank you so much for watching and leaving such a thoughtful comment. I have not heard of God of Gaps Theory. The idea that we are defined by what we do rather then what we are is very interesting and something i'll need to think about more. Thanks for sharing.
4 minutes of Insecurity.... keep coping
AI?
But the last 15 seconds I really get it together!