LIVE: Supreme Court hears Donald Trump immunity case

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 апр 2024
  • Watch live as the Supreme Court hears arguments Thursday over whether Donald Trump is immune from prosecution in a case charging him with plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.
    #trump #scotus #supremecourt #trumpimmunity #2020presidentialelection #unitedstates #news #donaldtrump

Комментарии • 217

  • @joygimbel7760
    @joygimbel7760 Месяц назад +48

    I’m so ashamed that this is what’s become of our highest court.

    • @pedropassament4299
      @pedropassament4299 Месяц назад +7

      Thanks to Trump.

    • @suesaosa5526
      @suesaosa5526 Месяц назад

      Joy , exactly 💯 it's a complete Judiciary Injustice and DemonRats crooked system.👹🧐

    • @glockdude5472
      @glockdude5472 Месяц назад +7

      @@pedropassament4299nice try Pedro

    • @WiseOwl_1408
      @WiseOwl_1408 Месяц назад +6

      ​@@pedropassament4299it's the same it's always been. Our short term bias blinds

    • @anonymoussource5344
      @anonymoussource5344 29 дней назад +1

      It’s not the court, it’s the attorneys who think they have a case. Nice try though.

  • @Scubidu-ni6ny
    @Scubidu-ni6ny 29 дней назад +4

    If a president has complete immunity why bother with impeachment?

  • @WilbertJohnson-nq5zd
    @WilbertJohnson-nq5zd 29 дней назад +4

    Don't expect the high court to uphold the law when comes to Mr trump maga judges will provide protection

  • @patricedemalartic2249
    @patricedemalartic2249 Месяц назад +33

    Why asking for immunity if you are innocent?…

    • @madame_crypto88
      @madame_crypto88 Месяц назад +4

      Because the DC court is saying that regardless if it’s official acts he doesn’t have immunity

    • @vincentokafor7282
      @vincentokafor7282 Месяц назад +5

      Why study for an exam if you are smart?

    • @slotfreak7094
      @slotfreak7094 Месяц назад +2

      He is asking for immunity that is due as per law and presidence.

    • @UnknownMoses
      @UnknownMoses 29 дней назад +1

      This is more about all future presidents than it is about Trump

    • @CollinKillian
      @CollinKillian 29 дней назад +2

      Presidential immunity is what keeps our country from becoming a banana Republic. The president has to have immunity for actions taken for conduct or actions taken during their terms. This doesn't mean a president is free to do as they want, the constitution has the remedy for a president who commits a crime during his term. Impeachment and subsequent conviction in the Senate, this removes the president and after his conviction in the senate that immunity is now lost and he can be prosecuted for said crime.

  • @Julesong
    @Julesong Месяц назад +20

    SCOTUS and attorneys speaking begins approx at 2:55:00 mark.

  • @conniecolon4443
    @conniecolon4443 29 дней назад +3

    what a joke. Trump is making this country the laughing stock. Be done with him already. Send him to jail.

  • @MikeKing001
    @MikeKing001 Месяц назад +8

    Starts at 2:55:17

  • @whatgoesaroundcomesaround920
    @whatgoesaroundcomesaround920 Месяц назад +24

    "[F]or his official acts ..". Since when is attempting to overthrow the government an "official act"? So isn't this "personal conduct"?

    • @cathywithac3793
      @cathywithac3793 Месяц назад +10

      Challenging an election is not "attempting to overthrow the government", unless Donald Trump does it.🙄

    • @JamiePollard-fh6ol
      @JamiePollard-fh6ol Месяц назад

      This is what democracy is. Aren’t you things all about democracy?

    • @John-xw3lr
      @John-xw3lr 28 дней назад +1

      And how did he do that?

  • @philipmay6003
    @philipmay6003 Месяц назад +14

    3:50:00 KB Jackson nails it.

    • @scout-187inf
      @scout-187inf Месяц назад +1

      No, she didn't. When the defense responded, she changed questions. She didn't even challenge it. Go back an re-hear it. She is an intelligant judge and i admire her but she lost that engagement.

  • @Watupfranco
    @Watupfranco Месяц назад +5

    Thank you AP

  • @ali_g79
    @ali_g79 Месяц назад +22

    3:04:25 sotomayor just described every politician in America. Reform the US GOVERNMENT!!!! it’s broken.

  • @deeliciousplum
    @deeliciousplum Месяц назад +4

    Due to what the world has observed, Trump as well as many of his enablers and the hate groups/individuals that he has ennobled and protected ought to have already been serving lengthy sentences. There have been far too many delays and some of the justice systems are plagued by Trump appointees/supporters who even as Trump commits or enables crime after crime would still not let their beliefs in him go. Sigh. ⚖

  • @philipmay6003
    @philipmay6003 Месяц назад +7

    John Sauer's arguments remind me of George C. Scott as General Buck Turgidson in Dr. Strangelove, explaining to the President how nuclear weapons were being released without the President's authorization.

  • @cannabistalk4164
    @cannabistalk4164 Месяц назад +15

    Bro argued the president can give away our country

    • @anonperson4597
      @anonperson4597 Месяц назад

      There are checks and balances. Congress has more power over our president than the courts. As it should be.

  • @rhiannas1355
    @rhiannas1355 Месяц назад +13

    Alito is nuts

    • @hsmd4533
      @hsmd4533 Месяц назад +3

      Maybe, but he’s often correct

    • @Idontgetoffended
      @Idontgetoffended Месяц назад

      And how do we know you are sane? Hemade it yo the supreme court... you made it to YT to whine and cry. 😔😥😢😭😭

  • @marypettitt9150
    @marypettitt9150 Месяц назад +22

    This is a positive sign that the scope of SCOTUS needs to be Constitutionally amended. We the People have no say over what happens in this court.

    • @redbarchetta8782
      @redbarchetta8782 Месяц назад

      So that's the positive sign?

    • @Idontgetoffended
      @Idontgetoffended Месяц назад

      This isn't a democracy. The people only have rights to a certain extent. Do we really want a bunch of screaming college kids to dictate laws... exactly.

    • @MargaretLindsey-jx7mn
      @MargaretLindsey-jx7mn 29 дней назад +2

      @marypettitt150
      We have to vote Blue. Straight down the ticket so we can Impeach!

    • @marypettitt9150
      @marypettitt9150 29 дней назад +1

      Redb it postively needs to be done.

    • @williamfowler616
      @williamfowler616 27 дней назад

      what is impeachment? answer that and you will know why a president is not accountable to you, and is only accountable to congress. DUH so you have a problem with the constitution?

  • @stevenwunder8187
    @stevenwunder8187 27 дней назад

    Detestable that they actually considered this question.

  • @agnetaandren141
    @agnetaandren141 28 дней назад +1

    I think of Kafka, Sauer is the example of a bureaucrat in its worst form

  • @IOSARBX
    @IOSARBX Месяц назад +3

    Associated Press, Subscribed because your videos are always awesome!

  • @cannabistalk4164
    @cannabistalk4164 Месяц назад +12

    We are arguing if the president is king or not

  • @ryanwhatever
    @ryanwhatever 6 дней назад

    I will sing and dance to the Bee Gees while my wife thinks I'm a dork.

  • @jetteroheller6395
    @jetteroheller6395 24 дня назад +1

    If a policeman is performing an official act as in arresting someone, the policeman is subject to the law, if the arrestee dies in the process of the arrest. It could be due to a mistake or a crime that the arrestee dies in the process of the arrest. The policeman is STILL subject to the law and can go to prison as an ultimate result of performing an official act.

  • @Evad-xp7xz
    @Evad-xp7xz Месяц назад +6

    SCOTUS being involved with this is in itself a crime

    • @michael-hw1uv
      @michael-hw1uv Месяц назад

      If Trump had a personality of Obama or FDR, none of you hypocrites would care about the Court cases. Most agree that his First Term was great and Trumps 2nd. term will be even better. Its his personality. JFK, Democrat.

    • @rhondakiblinger7339
      @rhondakiblinger7339 Месяц назад +2

      This isn't about personality. Never was. NOONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.

  • @estebanvaldez3632
    @estebanvaldez3632 Месяц назад +16

    If I had known about all of these scandals, I wouldn't have voted for tRump in 2016. But then, I'm not a magabilly and would never vote for the traitor anyway.

    • @musicjenjen
      @musicjenjen Месяц назад +3

      Glad to hear you know about it now.

    • @michael-hw1uv
      @michael-hw1uv Месяц назад

      If Trump had a personality of Obama or FDR, none of you hypocrites would care about the Court cases. Most agree that his First Term was great and Trumps 2nd. term will be even better. Its his personality. JFK, Democrat.

    • @rhondakiblinger7339
      @rhondakiblinger7339 Месяц назад

      Most do not agree... Terrible president. He should not be Immune.

  • @julianbruce7595
    @julianbruce7595 27 дней назад

    Gorsuch ended up being such a clutch supreme court justice pick.

  • @anonperson4597
    @anonperson4597 Месяц назад +1

    Why does the first guy speaking sound like a robot.

  • @antd8259
    @antd8259 Месяц назад +10

    What an embarrassment. Why is this foolishness even arguable? Trump has set a new low for this country. Just plain ridiculous and everyone knows it. Whether you are Republican or Democrat, this makes no sense.

    • @UnknownMoses
      @UnknownMoses Месяц назад

      So you think the government should create a situation where all future presidents can be blackmailed?

    • @musicjenjen
      @musicjenjen 29 дней назад

      @@UnknownMoses let's give this immunity, it will apply to Biden. Let him be our dictator. Hope you enjoy what you wish for.

  • @gfarrington681
    @gfarrington681 26 дней назад

    Time for Supreme Court Term Limits!!!

  • @reallysomebody
    @reallysomebody Месяц назад +10

    The lawyer from trump has a lot of gall talking about integrity and fear of factions

    • @stephendunn968
      @stephendunn968 Месяц назад +1

      The attorneys dreaming up charges to prosecute a political opponent that they are afraid they can't beat is who has the "gaul"

    • @reallysomebody
      @reallysomebody Месяц назад

      @@stephendunn968 we all watched trump break the law and his co conspirators are all being prosecuted for it but somehow he walks free?

    • @michael-hw1uv
      @michael-hw1uv Месяц назад

      If Trump had a personality of Obama or FDR, none of you hypocrites would care about the Court cases. Most agree that his First Term was great and Trumps 2nd. term will be even better. Its his personality. JFK, Democrat.

  • @Sundown-777
    @Sundown-777 27 дней назад +1

    The spending out of control to win is crazy..

    • @Sundown-777
      @Sundown-777 27 дней назад +2

      We are hurting so bad..

  • @angeleyes3396
    @angeleyes3396 26 дней назад

    Can you imagine the direction our Country can go if we make the wrong turn in this determination! 🙏🏽

  • @iamhe999
    @iamhe999 29 дней назад +3

    Sociopaths should never be allowed on a ballot or in a government office

  • @rubeccaclark3019
    @rubeccaclark3019 Месяц назад +2

    Trump you’re not making an impact with coming on with your commercials at the end of a media coverage on anything that concerns you you wasting your time and your money

  • @user-cz3bw5qe7p
    @user-cz3bw5qe7p Месяц назад +4

    Go ahead SCOTUS. Give presidents unlimited powers above the rules.

  • @Fristpeople
    @Fristpeople Месяц назад +8

    I hope they give Trump absolute immunity. Cause Dark Brandon has work to do. First he needs to take out his political rivals and anyone who doesn't agree with his world and social views. There are six Supreme Court seats that also qualify for this action. There is also senators and representatives that quality for this action also. Even quality immunity based on what Trump's lawyer describes will give Dark Brandon the power to do all the above. Is that what they really want? Come on people we need a decision fast cause Dark Brandon has work to do.. Now do you really want this? And there is still so much more. Make sure the elections elect Dark Brandon's people for all seats and then Hand the Presidency over to his Vice President without an election. That doesn't sound like a Republic or Democracy. Why did the Supreme Court even take this up?

    • @CollinKillian
      @CollinKillian 29 дней назад

      You don't understand what they're saying at all do you? Presidents have to have immunity for their official actions taken during their term. OFFICIAL is the key word here, arresting or killing political opposition or citizens who disagree with you isn't an official act. The constitution already has a means for addressing rogue presidents, and removing their immunity privileges. This would be impeachment, and subsequent conviction in the senate, this then can be prosecuted in court.

  • @aceylaurel996
    @aceylaurel996 28 дней назад

    You cannot be greater than that which created you.

  • @Kristal-qq8gv
    @Kristal-qq8gv 12 дней назад

    WE can hear you talking on the street!

  • @user-td7kx6hg3t
    @user-td7kx6hg3t 28 дней назад

    The man speaks have three vouces

  • @guitarfumar
    @guitarfumar Месяц назад

    Audio cuts out at 4:25:00 or so… why?

  • @Activist4America
    @Activist4America Месяц назад +4

    🇺🇲UNION JOE✊️2024🇺🇲
    Vote Blue for America, America!
    🇺🇲BIDEN/HARRIS🦅2024🇺🇸
    🇺🇲Liberal & Progressive Blue Wave too🇺🇲

  • @mackman77095
    @mackman77095 29 дней назад

    So if the president is given advice to something being lawful, but it was later found that it was not legal, the president isn't liable, but the attorney general is?

  • @ali_g79
    @ali_g79 Месяц назад +7

    5:25:13 can we be done then? This is a waste of tax dollars but then again, when is the US political system NOT wasting tax dollars??!

  • @themayne6303
    @themayne6303 29 дней назад

    Sad

  • @rockallknight
    @rockallknight Месяц назад +1

    3:05:18 is Jackson not Kagan

  • @christinacardinal5973
    @christinacardinal5973 Месяц назад +1

    Dosent she atomic get money from bond company??

  • @MargaretLindsey-jx7mn
    @MargaretLindsey-jx7mn 29 дней назад +1

    Why hasn't Thomas refused himself? He needs to be impeached. The only way to do it is to vote BLUE!

  • @LHfrut
    @LHfrut Месяц назад

    3:44:28 fair point it does seem like a false dichotomy which slips the presupposition that the official acts vs private acts is what determines immunity.

  • @rhondakiblinger7339
    @rhondakiblinger7339 Месяц назад +3

    Shame on you, Trump.

  • @khamtayphong2037
    @khamtayphong2037 28 дней назад

    I think the Democrats must to stop The GOP from baseless insults

  • @friedamarie7013
    @friedamarie7013 29 дней назад

    What a clown - Michael Dreeben - what a joke this man is.

  • @mackman77095
    @mackman77095 29 дней назад

    Prosecutors wouldn't do it, unless you are talking about Trump's first term. Or Biden's first and the defendant was Trump.

  • @Idontgetoffended
    @Idontgetoffended Месяц назад +1

    I'm just here for all the whining and crying!!!! JUST SAVE SOME TEARS PEOPLE... NOVEMBER IS RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER!!!!!😂😂😂

  • @WiseOwl_1408
    @WiseOwl_1408 Месяц назад +2

    Jackson BIG mad

  • @rintamorelik5062
    @rintamorelik5062 25 дней назад

    Better be a king not the president

  • @cordbauer9038
    @cordbauer9038 Месяц назад

    Alito: "If the president gets advice from the attorney general, that something is lawful, is that an absolute defense?"
    Dreeben: “yes”
    Alito: “Wouldn’t the President just pick an AG who’ll let him do whatever he wants?”
    Dreeben looked stunned
    Apparently the AG can provide absolute immunity, but the President who is his boss can’t.

  • @jeremy454
    @jeremy454 Месяц назад +5

    I am glad the court took this case. The Supreme Court needs to define presidential immunity. It needs to be a matter of constitutional law or upheld case law rather than political whims.

    • @melaniegates39
      @melaniegates39 Месяц назад

      We know from the Dobbs decision that established case law means nothing to SCOTUS. If they give Trump immunity, they will reverse their decision if Biden or any Democrat does something, then reverse themselves again when a Republic takes office.

  • @musicjenjen
    @musicjenjen Месяц назад +5

    These conservative justices need to stop interrupting Dreeben. RUDE!!

    • @Jimbojoebob
      @Jimbojoebob Месяц назад +1

      Really? Sotomayor does it more than anyone

  • @joelmatibenga2746
    @joelmatibenga2746 28 дней назад

    USA you guys are so young as a country...so funny to watch because you lot think you figured it all out.

  • @slotfreak7094
    @slotfreak7094 Месяц назад +3

    Super could use a lozenger

  • @FC-qe1wl
    @FC-qe1wl 29 дней назад +2

    The best ruling would be full immunity while in office and zero immunity after they leave office...
    And hopefully impeachment and removal will actyally work

  • @royalmint7831
    @royalmint7831 Месяц назад +2

    They all got little Peckers in there?

  • @JamesNolanConsulting
    @JamesNolanConsulting Месяц назад

    The Court would do well to consider the examples of public versus private acts of the executive discussed in Eric Foner's brilliant book The Second Founding.

    • @jimreily7538
      @jimreily7538 Месяц назад

      Foner truly is brilliant. What's The Second Founding about ? I've only read his book on Reconstruction

  • @marylovemyname7910
    @marylovemyname7910 Месяц назад +1

    Ketani youre gettingg on my nerves!!! Remember which side youre on!!!!!!!!! You are causing confusion!

    • @reallysomebody
      @reallysomebody Месяц назад +2

      I understood her well. Sorry if she goes over your head.

    • @maxkendall1298
      @maxkendall1298 Месяц назад +3

      Why do judges have sides?
      If that is the case .... where the hack does that leave the country? It is all just political

    • @marylovemyname7910
      @marylovemyname7910 Месяц назад

      @@reallysomebody do you know what you can do with your words?

    • @reallysomebody
      @reallysomebody Месяц назад +2

      @@marylovemyname7910 I can't try to overturn an election with my words without being criminally prosecuted

  • @michellehaley9011
    @michellehaley9011 Месяц назад +2

    This is so important for future presidents to come . This is not about Trump anymore .

  • @UnknownMoses
    @UnknownMoses 29 дней назад

    All official acts are core acts.

  • @texasnationalists9727
    @texasnationalists9727 Месяц назад +1

    Imagine thinking Trump is going to jail. LOL!

    • @HUNDREDACREWOOD.
      @HUNDREDACREWOOD. Месяц назад +2

      imagine thinking that he’s innocent of all of the 83 Federal Charges !
      imagine thinking that he’s gonna be president again after 83 Federal Charges !
      😂😂😂

    • @janisbrunst4226
      @janisbrunst4226 29 дней назад

      Or Biden or his son!

    • @Houstonreeves1
      @Houstonreeves1 27 дней назад

      @@HUNDREDACREWOOD.we will see how well this ages 🤣

  • @slotfreak7094
    @slotfreak7094 Месяц назад +3

    Jackson is more an activist. She doesn’t understand much of the big picture. Nobody says the president can do anything. Notice her getting excited when she thought she had him.

    • @reallysomebody
      @reallysomebody Месяц назад +8

      The attorney for trump is saying exactly that.

    • @redbarchetta8782
      @redbarchetta8782 Месяц назад +8

      You are pretending to be ignorant? That is EXACTLY what Sauer is arguing for tRump.

    • @slotfreak7094
      @slotfreak7094 Месяц назад +1

      @@redbarchetta8782 what is he arguing, I’ll wait.

    • @keganger
      @keganger Месяц назад +5

      Trumps lawyer said exactly that in the first 15 minutes. He directly stated the president could order a hit on his opponent and it would be immune to prosecution. You should pay more attention to the facts.

  • @slotfreak7094
    @slotfreak7094 Месяц назад

    Sotomayor had to rescue Alito. 7:14. Sauer has a great memory, but needs lozenges.
    He seemed to stump some judges.
    The lefty judges just wanted to manufacture a way to deny the appeal with their “hypotheticals”.

  • @vincentokafor7282
    @vincentokafor7282 Месяц назад +2

    Wow, Trump's lawyer is on fire. Great job quoting Benjamin Franklin!!

  • @marylovemyname7910
    @marylovemyname7910 Месяц назад +5

    Ketani youre fired!!!

    • @AdNauseamart
      @AdNauseamart Месяц назад +4

      Nah she’s gonna be there decades longer after Alito/Thomas die. 🎉

    • @jourdinthedragon
      @jourdinthedragon Месяц назад +1

      ​@@AdNauseamart She?

    • @HUNDREDACREWOOD.
      @HUNDREDACREWOOD. Месяц назад +1

      @@jourdinthedragon
      yes, Ketanji Brown is a woman…
      try to keep up.

    • @HUNDREDACREWOOD.
      @HUNDREDACREWOOD. Месяц назад +1

      No, YOURE fired, genius.

    • @jourdinthedragon
      @jourdinthedragon Месяц назад

      @@HUNDREDACREWOOD. What is a woman? Ketanji couldn't answer that so how am I supposed to know?

  • @LucjaStachurska
    @LucjaStachurska Месяц назад +1

    President Trump 2024!

  • @slotfreak7094
    @slotfreak7094 Месяц назад

    Sauer for SCOTUS.

  • @potatojoe3246
    @potatojoe3246 Месяц назад

    SCOTUS, "T R U M P 2 0 2 4 !!!"

  • @crisde2822
    @crisde2822 Месяц назад +1

    Jackson doesn't even know what a woman is... NO WONDER SHE'S CONFUSED 😂😂😂😂😂😂