Thanks, Mike, i appreciate you creating comprehensive and easy to follow tutorials, even though you don't get much views. Never stop! (Unless you're like tired or something)
Was very glad to hear that part about going back to KSP 1. The release of the KSP 2 early access is what got me to start playing KSP 1 again and I've only now just stumbled across you're channel which is strange because I've been looking for a good KSP 1 channel ever since Scott Manly stopped making KSP videos and while there are plenty of KSP RUclipsrs out there none of them seemed to be able to fill his shoes but yours are quite good.
I found you when I got back into KSP and couldn't remember how to play and I've been hooked since. Thanks for the great explanations and bonus math videos! I likes that engine mount by the way.
Thanks Mike for the video, I really appreciate you taking all the time to fly to the moon and back. The game looks stunning, but it's so incomplete and buggy, it's indeed not worth the price yet at all. It all depends on the definition of "early access" of course, but they kinda promised the early access would have ksp1 with renewed graphics and ui and then they would roadmap the rest. It's just that some of the most basic things just don't work. An orbit that changes itself, maneuver tool that doesn't predict right, flow priority that doesn't work, wobbly rockets once you go a little bigger, staging not always working. Which means that if you don't quicksave every few minutes, it will only give a lot of frustration. Besides that no science, no heating, no electricity, missing values that are required to go to other planets like visible periapsis or trajectory... I think the UI is less obvious than in ksp 1 but I guess that just takes some adjusting. I really looked forward to this game, and it has potential, but to me it seems that it will take almost a year before we get anything worth playing at this rate. This isn't early access, this is an alpha or early beta release and you don't charge people 50€/$ for that. You open it up for the weekend so people can test it out, and then go back to developing with the feedback. Let's hope the future will bring a great game, and that people don't lose interest after this early release of an unplayable game.
Pretty sure i missed you but just wanted to say I love your channel. You've helped me plant flags on both the Mun and Minmus so far. Much appreciated. Be well and take care.
You probably already know this by now, but two things: 1) The countdown is from 10 in "Kerbin" language. If you listen it sounds like a bit like Spanish. I.e., 8/ocho sounds a bit like "oko". 6 and 7 have enough similarity to it as well. When it gets down to 1, it is DEFINITELY "uno". 2) You're right, the throttle is definitely twitchy when pusing shift and ctrl; but you can manage it better using the mouse to grab the throttle. Love your video!!
I know this is a KSP 2 video, but the recent release made me start playing the original again after bouncing off it so many times. I've been following your 'beginner's guide' and I wanted to say a huge thanks - in the last couple of days I've successfully landed probes on the Mun and Minmus, and I just landed and returned some Kerbals from the Mun this morning. Would not have been possible without your amazing videos. Thanks so much and keep up the great work! :)
Mike - not watching ahead in the video to see if you found it, but there are toggles for fine camera control you can see in Settings. Hyped to see more from a master at work, no matter how buggy the Kerbal Space Program!
I think the app/per are changing because the ship is using rcs to maneuver to keep your "lock on X" which is changing your velocity/vector. I'll bet you money on that. (Notice the numbers only change when you are locked on a direction. Time warp "unlocks" you...)
Mike Great content as usual. I know it is supposed to be early access, but this just looks like ksp with clouds and nicer celestial bodies. It's really nothing of what was shown on the development videos. Hope your channel gets a lot of attention because you are the best teaching this game!
This is definitely my favorite KSP 2 video so far even after watching tons of other creators. Mike still teaching us stuff even though this isn't a tutorial. 😂
I just brought it up for the first time on my laptop running an NVidia GTX 1070, and an Intel Core i7. WOW!!!! The difference between how it runs on my laptop from how it runs on my desktop is like the difference between night and day!!!! I am only running it in 1980x1020 with ALL settings set to low, but it RAN!!!! My desktop was running it at only about a frame per second, but the laptop seemed to be running at at least 20-35 FPS. It was SMOOTH!!! My desktop is running an AMD Radeon RX56 Vega. That was a great card when I got it (it ran the HD version of SKYRIM!!!) but it's obviously not as great as I thought it was. My laptop is a year older and runs KSP2 FAR better.
Mike, this is an awesome "Live Stream". It's too bad you couldn't get it working. I have to say, after seeing many ppl doing live streams of KSP2, the game is REALLY buggy and not really stable enough to live stream right now. I bought it even though I only have a GTX 1660, but it still plays pretty good when set on the LOW graphics settings. I'm going to be upgrading my rig soon, so hopefully the Dev's will get right on fixing some of these bugs soon. I'm glad to know that I'm not the only one that had the 2.5 meter decoupler stick to the poodle engine. I liked your solution. I used the 2.5 stack separator instead and that fixed my issue. Anyway, I look forward to more of your KSP1 content! You rock! Keep up the great videos!
Again, you've probably already seen that a lot of the things mentioned have been fixed with patch .1 in mid-March, like the burn time and trajectory, etc. Those annoyances have been made better. However, any altitude at the Mun below 30 is problematic. I usually set an orbit around 30-35 for Pe and Ap. I remember KSP 1 you could do around 10 or just over. Maybe they'll fix that here.
@@MikeAben At what altitude? For some reason, any low orbit is problematic, as if the game thinks you are already on/in the Mun. I do all my Munar orbits above 30km. Are you still doing 10 or so? Like we did in KSP 1?
@@jimn6204 Yes, definitely below 30 km, but I'm not going to work around the way I play. I'd rather play KSP 1 and come back when they have this fixed.
Thanks. Just watching and subscribing is fine. If you want, I do have a Patreon page (link in the description), or you could become a RUclips Member by click the Join button.
@@MikeAben good to hear, can't wait to see more of your series! I just recently found your channel and have been binge watching some playlists. good stuff!
Mike!!!! Glad to see this!!! I gave them my $50 (I was sitting at my computer waiting for the 8a.m. hour here in the central time zone) and started the download before I went to work. It completed about three and a half hours later and was ready when I got home. I played with it a bit, but I'm playing it on an AMD Radeon RX56 Vega which is below even their lowest standard so it's barely playable. But I've got the game and it will be there ready to go when I upgrade my card, whenever that happens. I did load up the rover and took it for a tour of the space center a few days ago. That was fun. I'm about to try building a mun rocket and seeing how it works out. Happy flying (and CRASHING too!!!!). ********** Additional********** WOW!!!! Yeah, I've just confirmed it. I'm getting about a frame per second. For anyone who is on the fence and actually wants to run this you need a fairly recent vid card. Scott Manley was running an NVidia GeForce 3070 in his first vid and he said it was fine (that's a standard 3070, NOT a ti). Mike, what vid card are you running here? Thanks.
I'm running with an RTX 3080 Ti that I just installed. I would recommend waiting for some optimization patches from the devs before sinking money into a new card, unless you want to upgrade anyway.
@@MikeAben Yeah, I'm not upgrading anytime soon. Right now I watch every penny. If the crypto-market would soar I might be able to spend some money on a new card (new computer?!?!!?!?). But right now I'm waiting to see what the coming months bring from the developers. If they can get things flowing smoother and I can get a few more fps out of it it might be playable on my machine. Right now... I try moving the camera and instead of being smooth it's jerking around and flipping from one side of the craft to the other. I never thought I'd see a game run so poorly again. I mean this happened with "X-Wing" on my 100mhz Pentium machine running a Number Nine Corp GXE64 PRO card over a quarter century ago. I couldn't run that until I upgraded to a 166mhz PII with a... you know I can't even remember what it was. I had a dual card setup, one for standard graphics and a 3D accelerator card. I want to say one of them was a Voodoo, or maybe a Voodoo II. I want to say the other card was a Matrox Millenium. I think that would have been the only dual card system I ever had. After that the tech had advanced to the point that a single card was capable of handling standard and 3D. "The more things change, the more they stay the same".
One thing i really miss in both KSP 1 and now in KSP 2 (or maybe just don't find it?!) is to group or merge multiple parts into one, like for example you made a wing from many little pieces and ailerons and all and if you have to move the whole thing, all those parts should be in a "group".
You can do that in both games. In KSP1 it's called a subassembly, while in KSP2 you save groups of parts in different workspaces and then merge the workspaces.
Thank you so much for your KSP 1 tutorials! I know your voice.. Khan Academy?? NYS DOCCS implemented tablets..they have Khan Academy videos for free and I've listened to say mannny lessons that were beyond me..and loved every moment of it.. That.. that's you?? Right? It has to bee Either way, thank you
@@MikeAben That is so bizarre to me! From the inflections to..idk, everything! I'd believe anything either of you said. You both seem, to my mind, to have a limitless wealth of knowledge x_X Your long lost twin? (The VO I'm referring to) ruclips.net/video/uIojjqSm0m4/видео.html
Your video was excellent as always Mike, but so far KSP2 just doesn't impress me. Sure, it looks good, and the engine sounds are a big improvement on KSP1, the music sounds great, but I just don't see enough to spend £45 to upgrade from KSP1. And speaking of KSP1, it's nice to see they've kept it alive in the new game, the Ap and Pe changing for no reason goes right the way back to the KSP 1.0 Demo version! Have you tried building a tiny Munar lander with the extra small legs yet? In KSP1, those kegs were prone to bouncing off the surface of the Mun and Minmus when you jumped to them, a problem that had been ongoing from the first day those legs appeared, and they never fixed it (my greatest peeve of KSP), I wonder if they've left it in KSP2? For all my criticism of the game, I really did enjoy watching you setting out on your first Munar mission in the new game, now go feed that cat!
I love KSP for for the math and exploration, so I'm going to sit on the buying-now side of the do-or-don't debate and see how things go. I'll be trying some Kerbin satellites and manned orbits over the next few days. That said, I'm disappointed to see that the graphics really aren't much better than a modded KSP. I was really expecting cities and some on-planet activity to make the world feel more alive. And that Manoeveur Node system and readouts? That's awful, and we shouldn't even be in a 0.1.x release with apoapsis and periapsis not locking when no thrust is applied. The node planning tool itself seems just generations behind some of the best KSP mods, and learnings should have been taken from them. Add in no easy by-stage TWR in the VAB (so really, am I going to need an Engineering mod again just to get numbers?) and this feels really early. Let's hope we see significant, step-changes over the next few patches, because this game is not going to be getting anywhere close to playable and fun without that level of commitment and effort.
I really appreciate you driving home that KSP2 is still an unfinished product in EA and that is not yet complete. I share your optimism however that the devs will iron out the kinks in the future so that the game will be truly ready to play for the masses come 1 . 0 c:
I tried KSP2 for an hour or 4. It looks great compared to (modded) KSP1, the building itself has improved a lot but it's lacking so much basic features that I just can't. Back to KSP1. I will eagerly wait for the patches for KSP2 though, hopefully in a couple of months (probably years) it will be on par with KSP1. Then we can wait for the other features like multiplayer and interstellar. Despite the way too early launch - the future for KSP still looks promising.
you forgot to mention lightning fast loading times compared to ksp 1 foundation is pretty good if you disregard general optimization of the game and bugs but once that is fixed, new content will start rolling to fast for new ksp players to learn them all in time before next content update.
@@spatrk6634 Ah yes forgot that one, that has improved a lot also. So all in all I would have liked to see a more stable Early Access version too, but the basis looks great already.
@@MrEDET i think their priority is now is major bug fixing. before they add science stuff and start slowly optimizing the game more and more. i dont think optimization is priority, considering they want to add more features.
@@spatrk6634 There's so much work needed to be done for them.. I don't expect too much from the first patches. Wouldn't be surprised if it will take a couple of years before KSP2 is what we all want it to be. But that's ok - KSP1 remains great as ever and meanwhile I'll eagerly follow the development of KSP2. But at the moment I don't see KSP2 more as a techdemo of what it's going to become in the future.
I'll always call it the Moon with the umlaut because isn't that the whole point of using that so it's the 'moon' but not the 'moon? Losing the wordplay is hardly much of note but still, kind of sad really. (Maybe they just realized most people called it the Mun so they gave up?)
It's ironic that you agree with me. Sad to realize Mike converted at some point. (I recently started watching his Kerbalism playthrough, only on episode 184.)
It is a Moon. We call it, and all others like it Moons. It doesn't matter what they orbit, it is a Moon to us. We are Humans, not Kerbals. We call them Moons.
Thanks, Mike, i appreciate you creating comprehensive and easy to follow tutorials, even though you don't get much views. Never stop! (Unless you're like tired or something)
Your KSP1 tutorials are the best! You come across very genuine and relate well to what new players are thinking. Keep up the great work!
Was very glad to hear that part about going back to KSP 1. The release of the KSP 2 early access is what got me to start playing KSP 1 again and I've only now just stumbled across you're channel which is strange because I've been looking for a good KSP 1 channel ever since Scott Manly stopped making KSP videos and while there are plenty of KSP RUclipsrs out there none of them seemed to be able to fill his shoes but yours are quite good.
I found you when I got back into KSP and couldn't remember how to play and I've been hooked since. Thanks for the great explanations and bonus math videos! I likes that engine mount by the way.
Thanks Mike for the video, I really appreciate you taking all the time to fly to the moon and back. The game looks stunning, but it's so incomplete and buggy, it's indeed not worth the price yet at all. It all depends on the definition of "early access" of course, but they kinda promised the early access would have ksp1 with renewed graphics and ui and then they would roadmap the rest. It's just that some of the most basic things just don't work. An orbit that changes itself, maneuver tool that doesn't predict right, flow priority that doesn't work, wobbly rockets once you go a little bigger, staging not always working. Which means that if you don't quicksave every few minutes, it will only give a lot of frustration. Besides that no science, no heating, no electricity, missing values that are required to go to other planets like visible periapsis or trajectory... I think the UI is less obvious than in ksp 1 but I guess that just takes some adjusting.
I really looked forward to this game, and it has potential, but to me it seems that it will take almost a year before we get anything worth playing at this rate. This isn't early access, this is an alpha or early beta release and you don't charge people 50€/$ for that. You open it up for the weekend so people can test it out, and then go back to developing with the feedback.
Let's hope the future will bring a great game, and that people don't lose interest after this early release of an unplayable game.
You're right. I may be at an advantage as I never really listen to the promises in the first place.
Don't forget the EULA: you can't own anything! even if you do a mod for it, it will be the property of the studio, not yours...
Pretty sure i missed you but just wanted to say I love your channel. You've helped me plant flags on both the Mun and Minmus so far. Much appreciated. Be well and take care.
You probably already know this by now, but two things: 1) The countdown is from 10 in "Kerbin" language. If you listen it sounds like a bit like Spanish. I.e., 8/ocho sounds a bit like "oko". 6 and 7 have enough similarity to it as well. When it gets down to 1, it is DEFINITELY "uno". 2) You're right, the throttle is definitely twitchy when pusing shift and ctrl; but you can manage it better using the mouse to grab the throttle.
Love your video!!
I know this is a KSP 2 video, but the recent release made me start playing the original again after bouncing off it so many times. I've been following your 'beginner's guide' and I wanted to say a huge thanks - in the last couple of days I've successfully landed probes on the Mun and Minmus, and I just landed and returned some Kerbals from the Mun this morning. Would not have been possible without your amazing videos. Thanks so much and keep up the great work! :)
Glad they helped. There are more up to date KSP1 tutorials I have made as well.
Mike - not watching ahead in the video to see if you found it, but there are toggles for fine camera control you can see in Settings. Hyped to see more from a master at work, no matter how buggy the Kerbal Space Program!
Thanks. I'll look for them.
I think the app/per are changing because the ship is using rcs to maneuver to keep your "lock on X" which is changing your velocity/vector. I'll bet you money on that. (Notice the numbers only change when you are locked on a direction. Time warp "unlocks" you...)
There's no RCS on the ship, but it's a worthwhile experiment to see if turning off SAS makes any difference.
Fr best ksp content creator on RUclips
Mike Great content as usual. I know it is supposed to be early access, but this just looks like ksp with clouds and nicer celestial bodies. It's really nothing of what was shown on the development videos. Hope your channel gets a lot of attention because you are the best teaching this game!
This is definitely my favorite KSP 2 video so far even after watching tons of other creators. Mike still teaching us stuff even though this isn't a tutorial. 😂
I just brought it up for the first time on my laptop running an NVidia GTX 1070, and an Intel Core i7. WOW!!!! The difference between how it runs on my laptop from how it runs on my desktop is like the difference between night and day!!!! I am only running it in 1980x1020 with ALL settings set to low, but it RAN!!!! My desktop was running it at only about a frame per second, but the laptop seemed to be running at at least 20-35 FPS. It was SMOOTH!!! My desktop is running an AMD Radeon RX56 Vega. That was a great card when I got it (it ran the HD version of SKYRIM!!!) but it's obviously not as great as I thought it was. My laptop is a year older and runs KSP2 FAR better.
Mike, this is an awesome "Live Stream". It's too bad you couldn't get it working. I have to say, after seeing many ppl doing live streams of KSP2, the game is REALLY buggy and not really stable enough to live stream right now. I bought it even though I only have a GTX 1660, but it still plays pretty good when set on the LOW graphics settings. I'm going to be upgrading my rig soon, so hopefully the Dev's will get right on fixing some of these bugs soon. I'm glad to know that I'm not the only one that had the 2.5 meter decoupler stick to the poodle engine. I liked your solution. I used the 2.5 stack separator instead and that fixed my issue. Anyway, I look forward to more of your KSP1 content! You rock! Keep up the great videos!
Thanks for the video as always.
For the AP and PE to show up you have to deselect the maneuver node. Yes... it is annoying. :/
Nice "live" stream! So, anyone else having issues with disappearing Kerbals when you Recover a vessel? I think I've lost half my corps now.
Awesome tutorial, appreciated, explained a lot of basic mechanics i was struggling with
Glad it helped!
Again, you've probably already seen that a lot of the things mentioned have been fixed with patch .1 in mid-March, like the burn time and trajectory, etc. Those annoyances have been made better. However, any altitude at the Mun below 30 is problematic. I usually set an orbit around 30-35 for Pe and Ap. I remember KSP 1 you could do around 10 or just over. Maybe they'll fix that here.
I'm still having the issue with orbital parameters changing when not timewarping, and yeah, the timewarp thing is annoying.
@@MikeAben At what altitude? For some reason, any low orbit is problematic, as if the game thinks you are already on/in the Mun. I do all my Munar
orbits above 30km. Are you still doing 10 or so? Like we did in KSP 1?
@@jimn6204 Yes, definitely below 30 km, but I'm not going to work around the way I play. I'd rather play KSP 1 and come back when they have this fixed.
22:57 your paint was on part instead of assembly that’s why it was messed up.
Apollo style is definitely for the advanced user, as the UI for closest approach makes rendezvous quite a PITA.
"He wants food. Screw him." That made me burst out laughing for some reason lmao
Hey, Mike. I never would've gotten through Kerbin without your tutorials and I absolutely love it now. What can we do to support you?
Thanks. Just watching and subscribing is fine. If you want, I do have a Patreon page (link in the description), or you could become a RUclips Member by click the Join button.
I LOL'd at the training centre.
will you be continuing the channel after this series?
Absolutely, though mostly KSP1 until there next KSP2 update.
@@MikeAben good to hear, can't wait to see more of your series! I just recently found your channel and have been binge watching some playlists. good stuff!
Ngl, the non-stream premiere confuses me 😝 but love your stuff man, keep it up
Mike!!!! Glad to see this!!! I gave them my $50 (I was sitting at my computer waiting for the 8a.m. hour here in the central time zone) and started the download before I went to work. It completed about three and a half hours later and was ready when I got home. I played with it a bit, but I'm playing it on an AMD Radeon RX56 Vega which is below even their lowest standard so it's barely playable. But I've got the game and it will be there ready to go when I upgrade my card, whenever that happens. I did load up the rover and took it for a tour of the space center a few days ago. That was fun. I'm about to try building a mun rocket and seeing how it works out. Happy flying (and CRASHING too!!!!). ********** Additional********** WOW!!!! Yeah, I've just confirmed it. I'm getting about a frame per second. For anyone who is on the fence and actually wants to run this you need a fairly recent vid card. Scott Manley was running an NVidia GeForce 3070 in his first vid and he said it was fine (that's a standard 3070, NOT a ti). Mike, what vid card are you running here? Thanks.
I'm running with an RTX 3080 Ti that I just installed. I would recommend waiting for some optimization patches from the devs before sinking money into a new card, unless you want to upgrade anyway.
@@MikeAben Yeah, I'm not upgrading anytime soon. Right now I watch every penny. If the crypto-market would soar I might be able to spend some money on a new card (new computer?!?!!?!?). But right now I'm waiting to see what the coming months bring from the developers. If they can get things flowing smoother and I can get a few more fps out of it it might be playable on my machine. Right now... I try moving the camera and instead of being smooth it's jerking around and flipping from one side of the craft to the other. I never thought I'd see a game run so poorly again. I mean this happened with "X-Wing" on my 100mhz Pentium machine running a Number Nine Corp GXE64 PRO card over a quarter century ago. I couldn't run that until I upgraded to a 166mhz PII with a... you know I can't even remember what it was. I had a dual card setup, one for standard graphics and a 3D accelerator card. I want to say one of them was a Voodoo, or maybe a Voodoo II. I want to say the other card was a Matrox Millenium. I think that would have been the only dual card system I ever had. After that the tech had advanced to the point that a single card was capable of handling standard and 3D. "The more things change, the more they stay the same".
One thing i really miss in both KSP 1 and now in KSP 2 (or maybe just don't find it?!) is to group or merge multiple parts into one, like for example you made a wing from many little pieces and ailerons and all and if you have to move the whole thing, all those parts should be in a "group".
You can do that in both games. In KSP1 it's called a subassembly, while in KSP2 you save groups of parts in different workspaces and then merge the workspaces.
@@MikeAben Thanks, right. Guess this can serve for the purpose i had in mind ;-)
Great video! KSP2 has been a little frustrating.
Hopefully, this will be good exposure for you Sir. I enjoy your videos. Entertaining. Been watching your Kerbalism Playlist. Keep up the fine work. 🙂
Much appreciated
well done sir!
Thank you so much for your KSP 1 tutorials!
I know your voice.. Khan Academy??
NYS DOCCS implemented tablets..they have Khan Academy videos for free and I've listened to say mannny lessons that were beyond me..and loved every moment of it.. That.. that's you?? Right? It has to bee
Either way, thank you
Thanks, but sorry, I've not worked for Kahn Academy. I'm taking it as a compliment, though.
@@MikeAben That is so bizarre to me! From the inflections to..idk, everything! I'd believe anything either of you said. You both seem, to my mind, to have a limitless wealth of knowledge x_X
Your long lost twin?
(The VO I'm referring to) ruclips.net/video/uIojjqSm0m4/видео.html
when i saw the 50 dollar price tag i was shocked (50 dollars for me is unobtainable)
its not worth 50 now either way.
so best put it on wishlist and wait for some major sale.
Agreed!
to get silver you adjust the transparency slider
Your video was excellent as always Mike, but so far KSP2 just doesn't impress me.
Sure, it looks good, and the engine sounds are a big improvement on KSP1, the music sounds great, but I just don't see enough to spend £45 to upgrade from KSP1.
And speaking of KSP1, it's nice to see they've kept it alive in the new game, the Ap and Pe changing for no reason goes right the way back to the KSP 1.0 Demo version! Have you tried building a tiny Munar lander with the extra small legs yet? In KSP1, those kegs were prone to bouncing off the surface of the Mun and Minmus when you jumped to them, a problem that had been ongoing from the first day those legs appeared, and they never fixed it (my greatest peeve of KSP), I wonder if they've left it in KSP2?
For all my criticism of the game, I really did enjoy watching you setting out on your first Munar mission in the new game, now go feed that cat!
I love KSP for for the math and exploration, so I'm going to sit on the buying-now side of the do-or-don't debate and see how things go. I'll be trying some Kerbin satellites and manned orbits over the next few days.
That said, I'm disappointed to see that the graphics really aren't much better than a modded KSP. I was really expecting cities and some on-planet activity to make the world feel more alive.
And that Manoeveur Node system and readouts? That's awful, and we shouldn't even be in a 0.1.x release with apoapsis and periapsis not locking when no thrust is applied. The node planning tool itself seems just generations behind some of the best KSP mods, and learnings should have been taken from them. Add in no easy by-stage TWR in the VAB (so really, am I going to need an Engineering mod again just to get numbers?) and this feels really early.
Let's hope we see significant, step-changes over the next few patches, because this game is not going to be getting anywhere close to playable and fun without that level of commitment and effort.
I couldn’t make the “live” stream. Catching up now.
I really appreciate you driving home that KSP2 is still an unfinished product in EA and that is not yet complete. I share your optimism however that the devs will iron out the kinks in the future so that the game will be truly ready to play for the masses come 1 . 0 c:
I think 1.0 is still a long way away, though, but yeah it could be great. I'm very eager to see how their campaign mode will work.
Mike, what are your pc specs?
Ryzen 7 CPU, RTX 3080 Ti GPU, 32 GB RAM. I think I may put this in the description.
I tried KSP2 for an hour or 4. It looks great compared to (modded) KSP1, the building itself has improved a lot but it's lacking so much basic features that I just can't. Back to KSP1.
I will eagerly wait for the patches for KSP2 though, hopefully in a couple of months (probably years) it will be on par with KSP1.
Then we can wait for the other features like multiplayer and interstellar.
Despite the way too early launch - the future for KSP still looks promising.
you forgot to mention lightning fast loading times compared to ksp 1
foundation is pretty good if you disregard general optimization of the game and bugs
but once that is fixed, new content will start rolling to fast for new ksp players to learn them all in time before next content update.
@@spatrk6634 Ah yes forgot that one, that has improved a lot also. So all in all I would have liked to see a more stable Early Access version too, but the basis looks great already.
@@MrEDET i think their priority is now is major bug fixing.
before they add science stuff and start slowly optimizing the game more and more.
i dont think optimization is priority, considering they want to add more features.
@@spatrk6634 There's so much work needed to be done for them.. I don't expect too much from the first patches. Wouldn't be surprised if it will take a couple of years before KSP2 is what we all want it to be. But that's ok - KSP1 remains great as ever and meanwhile I'll eagerly follow the development of KSP2. But at the moment I don't see KSP2 more as a techdemo of what it's going to become in the future.
What's that engine between the Spider and the Terrier? I don't recognize it.
Edit: it might be the R.A.P.I.E.R. but again, I can't tell.
It is the RAPIER.
I'll always call it the Moon with the umlaut because isn't that the whole point of using that so it's the 'moon' but not the 'moon? Losing the wordplay is hardly much of note but still, kind of sad really. (Maybe they just realized most people called it the Mun so they gave up?)
It's ironic that you agree with me. Sad to realize Mike converted at some point. (I recently started watching his Kerbalism playthrough, only on episode 184.)
Maybe I should stick to my guns.
@@MikeAben I'm happy if you're happy. Keep up the good work, Mike.
You sound so much like quill18
Sometimes you sound a lot like Falcon from Gameranx
What are your specs
Ryzen 7 CPU, RTX 3080 Ti GPU, 32 GB RAM
We should all unsubscribe from people that are promoting ksp2 as long as it stays 50$. I removed Matt, Scott and Shadowzone, bunch of sell outs.
I believe I was saying people likely shouldn't be buying it within the first few minutes of the video.
It is a Moon. We call it, and all others like it Moons. It doesn't matter what they orbit, it is a Moon to us. We are Humans, not Kerbals. We call them Moons.
WOW, really hate the cartoony look of all the parts