If you do this at 22ghz-27ghz you'll probably have more success. That's the resonant frequency of H2O. I think 27ghz is the frequency of the molecular bonds. You could use the same voltage(or less), same amperage but adjust the frequency to be more suitable for liberating the two atoms. Also if you use a platinum electrode it will work even better. Platinum facilitates H2 and O2 formation because of available electrons. Also if you accomplish this another byproduct is electricity. After separation and burning the water, recombining H2 and O2 there's an excess of free electrons left over.
UV rays and some laser frequencies also are bond rupture facilitators, i think the first are best solution because easiest and more similar to solutions of the trees in the nature
this is good illustration of how high voltages can electrolyse water, try doing this with those dc modules that generate hv at around 5 watts of input also..i have too much fear playing with AC MOTs, but Ive done similar experiments with DC input high voltage ignition coils set up on buzzing relays around 450hz, dc modules today do a very good job at this, also try to do electrolysis with steam vapour, or jet sprays of water, I bet it will be easier to achieve results,very good keep up the experiments and BE SAFE!! REMEMBER AT THE END OF THE DAY WE'RE LOOKING FOR EFFICIENCY IN ACHIEVING ELECTROLYSIS
5kV @ 400mA.... Your pumping 2,000 watts into that water. Any correctly built plate cell with 2,000 watts would produce 100x more gas than that spark plug. Cool video though.
That hydrogen is not getting ionized. When your gas volume reaches criticality, there is an ion path that forms between your cathode and anode (which are alternating BTW) this give you a detonation which recombines the hydrogen and oxygen giving you steam.
do you know stanle meyer and his type of voltrolisis? he use high voltage at low amp this is the secret to run your car on water. electrolysis loss many efficiency and use lots of amps. so yes this is an example he need to do more work than connect a spark on the microwave but i thinkg is the right way.
You know if you run your cells at 1.3 to 1.5 V and 450 GHz Square wave transverse to a 3T Field at 149 C and 200 MPa (30,000 PSI ) .. you'l have an expensive thing that you can add selenium sulfide, graphite, Iron II oxide, and nickel nano power to just for fun, and get more than 100% efficiency.
I think the anode and cathode are too close which causes the Hydrogen and Oxygen to ignite. Try it with the electrodes a bit further. You definitely know this, but in case someone not knowledgeable reads this comment and attempts this, be careful about Hydrogen gas build up due to explosive hazard
When the spark is visible during electrolysis you are generating only a minimum of hydrogen + oxygen. Since both gases are produced in stoichiometric proportions any time a spark is visible you will be igniting the bubbles of gas. While it is true that some gas does still escape the spark plug and bubble to the surface you are in actuality wasting almost all of the power you are putting into the circuit. Running the system without a spark, however, is a very effective electrolysis method.
If you use a spark plug to do "electrolysis" - the spark will consume whatever hydrogen and oxygen is created instantaneously - assuming that is what is actually happening and not simply boiling the water into vapor. So all you are doing is putting 2000Watts (5000V x 0.4A) of energy into the water and heating it up. You need to collect the gas, and ignite it to test it.
I see a small problem with your setup. Electrolysis can only occur while passing direct current through submerged electrodes, and since you attached your electrodes before rectifier you are not electrolysing anything, you are just heating up that water with alternating current.
@overunitydotcom it's very easy this experiment !! the arc travel through the bubbles only not in water really ! it's a cracking of water ! the level of ionization is very small for hydrogen..look the spectra of balmer lamp... it's hydrogen ! for the next experiment you can see the current in the circuit and the spectra and other things...
I did this experiment with the spark plug set to 15 thousandths of an inch. But after only a few seconds of vigorous activity the spark plug gap read 50 thousands. Apparently the oxygen and hydrogen explode under water- it sure sounds like it- I was worried the jar would crack.
Well done, but you are bruning again the water,.,. Didn´t you want to generate Hydrogen or Oxyhadrogen ? How much power do you put in there, when it is burning ? Regards, Stefan.
lol this guy... The only thing you are producing is heat this way... The Hydrogen that is produced instantly burns with the oxygen (cuz you have the damn thing upside down) and the Hydronium ion and hydroxide ion are reacting together causing more heat (which happens always even in setups that make sense, this is why producing hydrogen with electrolysis isn't worth using grid electricity for because energy is lost in the form of heat (In case you don't know the reaction between Hydronium and Hydroxide contains a lot of energy which will be lost in the form of heat)). So you just turned a microwave that heats food, in the weirdest contraption ever that heats water... Genius...
You are absolutely correct in your statement, "this is why producing hydrogen with electrolysis isn't worth using grid electricity" however, your point about (using GRID ELECTRICITY to produce hydrogen not being feasible because the hydrogen produced isn't worth the cost of the electricity used to produce it) didn't go unnoticed. A more telling economic assessment might be the marginal cost of electricity. We are aware the some energy companies are at this moment producing and storing hydrogen gas underground for themselves, so the determining financial factor really depends on the price one is paying for the electricity which one is using to produce the hydrogen. Using solar, wind, natural gas, nuclear, geothermal, etc. to create hydrogen may be feasible, but not your house current...Not yet anyway. So, MrBurnaut is correct, it is a matter of the economics of electrical generation and grid power just doesn't cut it. You will have to find a much cheaper source of electricity.
Ray Hensley It would be worth it if you get 100% efficiency, because you will get enormous loads of H2 by using just a little electricity. Fact is the hydronium and hydroxide have to be produced as a side product of creating H2 from water with electrolysis, which drops your efficiency and the exchange of costs between electricity and hydrogen. But doesn't take away that this guy is probably in the 0.1-2% efficiency range. If you buy hydrogen straight from a company you also have to pay markup (profit for the company), which is roughly the same as the electricity costs. If you can make a capable machine with sufficient efficiency, it is cheaper to produce yourself than to buy hydrogen straight from a retailer. (This is MrBurnaut on one of my many accounts by the way)
your close ? someone already built a power/spark plug that is a complicated little basterd , they used magnets to change the water molicuals ? so they faced the same way or something , then just as it enterd the plug they put a voltage on the sides and hit it with a radio frequency and it came out a spray nozzle under high pressure , and the spark timeing was set to let the cylender fill just enough then ignite , the water left would flash to steam giving alittle more power to the cylinder , ??
1st. It break the water and the results is gases (Hydrogen +oxygen) 2nd. Arc can across the bubble in high voltage. 3rd. some or most of the gases can spend by flame. 4th. the efficiency is low
good :) but try this with water as a steam, not liquid form. when water is liquid you must put huge amout of energy to make effect. but if you boil water and make steam..... try this :) good luck
so whats more important for Electroylsis, Amperage or voltage? What about those huge batteries taht are only 6 volts? What about 9 volt batteries run in series?
+2583060 Electrolysis only takes 1.23 Volts, that's the separation voltage of water, but current determines how much hydrogen is produced. H2 weighs 2 grams for each 6.02 x 10^23 H2 molecules, which is 1.204 x 10^24 atoms of hydrogen. A joule is 6.241 x 10^19 electrons, so it takes 19291 Joules to make 2 gms of H2. Now an Amp is a Joule/second, so at one Amp it would take 19291 seconds to make 2 gms of hydrogen. If you used 100 Amps it would be 193 seconds. Any higher voltage than 1.23 Volts doesn't do anything and turns into waste heat and boils the water. As it is, this theoretical calculation doesn't predict product, because only 40% of the electrons actually participate in electrolysis, the rest just conduct through the electrolyte and lose their energy to heat. This makes hydrogen production extremely inefficient and lossy, which is why it isn't used for fuel and why batteries are more than twice as efficient at storing energy.
Eso no es electrólisis. Si fuese el caso de generarse hidrógeno, hubiese detonado con la chispa generada. Además, para la electrólisis no se emplea corriente alterna. Eso a lo mucho es evaporación. Es mi opinión.
have you tried grounding the plug via salt water ......if there was a way to get that current to travel a father gap in the salt water.....lol i cant type what i need to say lol and i think what i am saying would need higher voltage
just use steam. the pressures that build up during steam engine opperation could run a generator for like nothing. then factor that into your hho production. you could literally convert biomass into jet fuel. :D
Better superconduting alloys, mention the best turbo charged type of system, passed through chambering "tubing", no additives, water or salt water different super conducting matails for high volt, maybe even crystalline structure, so im looking for the best chemical composite scientic name "table of element" and for fun atomic compositor layering system "for those with big kids toys", ie best superstructure elemental table for ionization of salt, and best for pure water, river water and and underground water. ie I used to live in greenbushes. W.Aust and it was next to a rare earth minesite, great for superstructures ie like I heard all the sony ps2 chips were apparently from minerals at that mine site. I had the worst electric shock of my life touching a rock that had built up charge, and that's saying something as ive put my finger in a mains, while pulling the wall panel off that had the mains box, the main fuse was out and there was an electricion infront of the box and the main fuse he'd taken out and left it on, and through that I still held onto the panel, manurvored and when the sparky and another guy on my left had a grip of the wall panel took my finger out, and another time, I put a key in a powerpoint socket in Australia and held on for a couple of seconds. and that friggin rock at greenbushes that had probably been build charge because of its superstructure, great mix of quartz, some sort black rock and goodness knows. oh and by the way I could do with some simple blueprints of tube chambering system simple for someone with a lathe, and about the size of of a beer, fizzle dink pop, ommm fresh start now where were we. :)
Anakan Zillionaire and u could do an outside chambering that seperates the hydrogen and oxygen ie diferent chamberings, then remix at end for perfect air to hydrogen mix ratio for best burn in a combustion engine. size variance table on size of carberetta based on size of engine output, for maximum efficency. ommm, go make a tea or some such thing.
with such design, amounts of produced HHO doubtable, you need bubbler anyway, without any measuring - child style game only, if you get that with 1wt power in - will be interesting, with 1kWt everything intresting... some time electrolisys looking good, but when you burn gas in flame - results almost nothing, even cannot melt thin iron wire
Great now how about a double low voltage cathode to make HHO and the same cathodes used with capacitor discharge ignition system to burn a mixture of choise 25/1 air fuel ratio at 22/1 compression ratio like dual fuel engines run. So I can put it in my hot rod and get twice the horsepower with a tiny bit of fuel. Figure that out and we can resurrect our old Hot Rods possibly run them on straight Alcohol. Make an h--l of an aircraft engine too!!!!!
@mamun if you want to get the plans to build your own HHO kit go to Google search for "Top HHO Gas Car Research" Click the first result ( Skip the advertisement)
The water injection spark plug was invented in the late 80's but the inventor got killed. Forget his name. But so many years and not that much progress wonder why? Hope the common person can power their own vehicles and soon anti gravity through Victor Shauberger's inventions must happen. Let go people - to the drawing boards.
@@nageshji8771 hell this is a while ago However out of the box a MOT is AC and 2kV (volt) RMS (i see i also commented it's AC somewhere) but before it goes to the magnetron it gets doubled to about 4.6 kV DC with some severe ripple i commented that back in the day as i didn't think about the fact it is rectified and doubled (the cap and diode essentially act as a halfwave rectifier and voltage doubler) so i'm sure it's correct what he says in the description (~5kV at 400mA)
If you do this at 22ghz-27ghz you'll probably have more success. That's the resonant frequency of H2O. I think 27ghz is the frequency of the molecular bonds. You could use the same voltage(or less), same amperage but adjust the frequency to be more suitable for liberating the two atoms. Also if you use a platinum electrode it will work even better. Platinum facilitates H2 and O2 formation because of available electrons. Also if you accomplish this another byproduct is electricity. After separation and burning the water, recombining H2 and O2 there's an excess of free electrons left over.
UV rays and some laser frequencies also are bond rupture facilitators, i think the first are best solution because easiest and more similar to solutions of the trees in the nature
But sir there is no processor that can get that speeeed Sir PLEAAAASEEEE 🙏🙏🙏
Hello, do you developed this Kind of ideas successfully?
OMFG the little "ding" at the end just made this epic! I am both impressed and laughing my ass off
very funny and interesting.
i like the "ding" so much...classy
because a digital cell phone camera is proper equipment for analyzing spectral lines
this is good illustration of how high voltages can electrolyse water, try doing this with those dc modules that generate hv at around 5 watts of input also..i have too much fear playing with AC MOTs, but Ive done similar experiments with DC input high voltage ignition coils set up on buzzing relays around 450hz, dc modules today do a very good job at this, also try to do electrolysis with steam vapour, or jet sprays of water, I bet it will be easier to achieve results,very good keep up the experiments and BE SAFE!! REMEMBER AT THE END OF THE DAY WE'RE LOOKING FOR EFFICIENCY IN ACHIEVING ELECTROLYSIS
also try to do electrolysis with steam vapour,
the music makes it rocket science :)
Im correct, you're igniting the hydrogen with the electrode as its being produced. Is that right?
@proximxr yes it's hydrogen ! why ? it's an electrolysis of water H2O not enough energy in micro bubbles
5kV @ 400mA.... Your pumping 2,000 watts into that water. Any correctly built plate cell with 2,000 watts would produce 100x more gas than that spark plug.
Cool video though.
That hydrogen is not getting ionized. When your gas volume reaches criticality, there is an ion path that forms between your cathode and anode (which are alternating BTW) this give you a detonation which recombines the hydrogen and oxygen giving you steam.
lookup water jumping over current, and think about di-polar static ionization excitement.
WOULD attaching plates to the current make the generation process more intense and higher yielding of gas HHO ???
do you know stanle meyer and his type of voltrolisis? he use high voltage at low amp this is the secret to run your car on water. electrolysis loss many efficiency and use lots of amps. so yes this is an example he need to do more work than connect a spark on the microwave but i thinkg is the right way.
You know if you run your cells at 1.3 to 1.5 V and 450 GHz Square wave transverse to a 3T Field at 149 C and 200 MPa (30,000 PSI ) .. you'l have an expensive thing that you can add selenium sulfide, graphite, Iron II oxide, and nickel nano power to just for fun, and get more than 100% efficiency.
I think the anode and cathode are too close which causes the Hydrogen and Oxygen to ignite. Try it with the electrodes a bit further. You definitely know this, but in case someone not knowledgeable reads this comment and attempts this, be careful about Hydrogen gas build up due to explosive hazard
Not on this scale
When the spark is visible during electrolysis you are generating only a minimum of hydrogen + oxygen. Since both gases are produced in stoichiometric proportions any time a spark is visible you will be igniting the bubbles of gas. While it is true that some gas does still escape the spark plug and bubble to the surface you are in actuality wasting almost all of the power you are putting into the circuit. Running the system without a spark, however, is a very effective electrolysis method.
High current, at only a couple volts works much better. Rewind the MOT secondary with a large gauge wire cord about 5 turns to get what you want.
welder?
If you use a spark plug to do "electrolysis" - the spark will consume whatever hydrogen and oxygen is created instantaneously - assuming that is what is actually happening and not simply boiling the water into vapor. So all you are doing is putting 2000Watts (5000V x 0.4A) of energy into the water and heating it up. You need to collect the gas, and ignite it to test it.
I see a small problem with your setup. Electrolysis can only occur while passing direct current through submerged electrodes, and since you attached your electrodes before rectifier you are not electrolysing anything, you are just heating up that water with alternating current.
did you tried to do this with a wet/dry cell??
@overunitydotcom it's very easy this experiment !! the arc travel through the bubbles only
not in water really ! it's a cracking of water ! the level of ionization is very small for hydrogen..look the spectra of balmer lamp... it's hydrogen ! for the next experiment
you can see the current in the circuit and the spectra and other things...
I did this experiment with the spark plug set to 15 thousandths of an inch. But after only a few seconds of vigorous activity the spark plug gap read 50 thousands. Apparently the oxygen and hydrogen explode under water- it sure sounds like it- I was worried the jar would crack.
dude you voided your warranty ; )
Micah Epps Voided it in a cool way, but voided indeed.
LOL
Well done, but you are bruning again the water,.,. Didn´t you want to generate Hydrogen or Oxyhadrogen ? How much power do you put in there, when it is burning ?
Regards, Stefan.
Why so few likes?
You deserve much more
lol this guy... The only thing you are producing is heat this way... The Hydrogen that is produced instantly burns with the oxygen (cuz you have the damn thing upside down) and the Hydronium ion and hydroxide ion are reacting together causing more heat (which happens always even in setups that make sense, this is why producing hydrogen with electrolysis isn't worth using grid electricity for because energy is lost in the form of heat (In case you don't know the reaction between Hydronium and Hydroxide contains a lot of energy which will be lost in the form of heat)). So you just turned a microwave that heats food, in the weirdest contraption ever that heats water... Genius...
You are absolutely correct in your statement, "this is why producing hydrogen with electrolysis isn't worth using grid electricity" however, your point about (using GRID ELECTRICITY to produce hydrogen not being feasible because the hydrogen produced isn't worth the cost of the electricity used to produce it) didn't go unnoticed.
A more telling economic assessment might be the marginal cost of electricity.
We are aware the some energy companies are at this moment producing and storing hydrogen gas underground for themselves, so the determining financial factor really depends on the price one is paying for the electricity which one is using to produce the hydrogen. Using solar, wind, natural gas, nuclear, geothermal, etc. to create hydrogen may be feasible, but not your house current...Not yet anyway.
So, MrBurnaut is correct, it is a matter of the economics of electrical generation and grid power just doesn't cut it. You will have to find a much cheaper source of electricity.
Ray Hensley It would be worth it if you get 100% efficiency, because you will get enormous loads of H2 by using just a little electricity. Fact is the hydronium and hydroxide have to be produced as a side product of creating H2 from water with electrolysis, which drops your efficiency and the exchange of costs between electricity and hydrogen. But doesn't take away that this guy is probably in the 0.1-2% efficiency range. If you buy hydrogen straight from a company you also have to pay markup (profit for the company), which is roughly the same as the electricity costs. If you can make a capable machine with sufficient efficiency, it is cheaper to produce yourself than to buy hydrogen straight from a retailer. (This is MrBurnaut on one of my many accounts by the way)
Wow, at least one person intelligent enough to explain this hoax, I'm impressed, I thought I were the only person who thinks this is bullshit
What if you trying to make deutirium?
the DING! LOL
your close ? someone already built a power/spark plug that is a complicated little basterd , they used magnets to change the water molicuals ? so they faced the same way or something , then just as it enterd the plug they put a voltage on the sides and hit it with a radio frequency and it came out a spray nozzle under high pressure , and the spark timeing was set to let the cylender fill just enough then ignite , the water left would flash to steam giving alittle more power to the cylinder , ??
is this spark plug really seperating the hydrogen and oxygen gasses or simply boiling the water at the point of ignition?
Oil companies; want to know your location
thx for showing that i need something that is both anode and Cathode with large surface area.
P.S. How fast does the water heat up ? Is it destilled water or tap water ?
Is welder with 2 carbon rods the same?
1st. It break the water and the results is gases (Hydrogen +oxygen)
2nd. Arc can across the bubble in high voltage.
3rd. some or most of the gases can spend by flame.
4th. the efficiency is low
Do you see any consumption of the electrodes?
Thank you for this test.
Very Best Regards,
Diveflyfish
good :) but try this with water as a steam, not liquid form. when water is liquid you must put huge amout of energy to make effect. but if you boil water and make steam..... try this :) good luck
DING! Your fuel cell car is now fueled!
@diveflyfish current or ???
Solo eso es in experimento pero no es suficiente para producir gran cantidad y hacer mover un motor o iti
amazing! not dangerous at all
Do you think this is why they poisoned STANLEY MEYERS?
Sorry i don t know. ..
so whats more important for Electroylsis, Amperage or voltage? What about those huge batteries taht are only 6 volts? What about 9 volt batteries run in series?
+2583060 Electrolysis only takes 1.23 Volts, that's the separation voltage of water, but current determines how much hydrogen is produced. H2 weighs 2 grams for each 6.02 x 10^23 H2 molecules, which is 1.204 x 10^24 atoms of hydrogen. A joule is 6.241 x 10^19 electrons, so it takes 19291 Joules to make 2 gms of H2. Now an Amp is a Joule/second, so at one Amp it would take 19291 seconds to make 2 gms of hydrogen. If you used 100 Amps it would be 193 seconds. Any higher voltage than 1.23 Volts doesn't do anything and turns into waste heat and boils the water. As it is, this theoretical calculation doesn't predict product, because only 40% of the electrons actually participate in electrolysis, the rest just conduct through the electrolyte and lose their energy to heat. This makes hydrogen production extremely inefficient and lossy, which is why it isn't used for fuel and why batteries are more than twice as efficient at storing energy.
The only FREE energy is the GIbbs free energy. .1.23 Volts is over unity.
I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IS GOING ON!
but i watch all your videos anyway.
One day i wish to understand all of this...
12 years later...I also have no clue what is going on ??...😂
THE FUCKING DING!!!!!! AHAHHAHAHAHAH
Eso no es electrólisis. Si fuese el caso de generarse hidrógeno, hubiese detonado con la chispa generada. Además, para la electrólisis no se emplea corriente alterna. Eso a lo mucho es evaporación. Es mi opinión.
2:44 THE UNIVERSE
You're not the only one who has no idea.
Will it turn lard into gold?
Instead of drownding the spark plug in water try hiting it with supper heated steam
have you tried grounding the plug via salt water ......if there was a way to get that current to travel a father gap in the salt water.....lol i cant type what i need to say lol and i think what i am saying would need higher voltage
Is a microwave transformer DC or AC. I'm guess DC because you specified a cathode and anode but just wondering
positive cycle charges capacitor no spark, negative cycle doubles voltage on capacitor and spark discharges in plug
@overunitydotcom just tap water because the resistivity is too high in distilled water
BRRRRRRRRRRR!!!! DING!!! Very cool...
just use steam. the pressures that build up during steam engine opperation could run a generator for like nothing. then factor that into your hho production. you could literally convert biomass into jet fuel. :D
Interesting! Thanks! ~Russ
Add ormus to solution and prepare to be amazed.
Better superconduting alloys, mention the best turbo charged type of system, passed through chambering "tubing", no additives, water or salt water different super conducting matails for high volt, maybe even crystalline structure, so im looking for the best chemical composite scientic name "table of element" and for fun atomic compositor layering system "for those with big kids toys", ie best superstructure elemental table for ionization of salt, and best for pure water, river water and and underground water. ie I used to live in greenbushes. W.Aust and it was next to a rare earth minesite, great for superstructures ie like I heard all the sony ps2 chips were apparently from minerals at that mine site. I had the worst electric shock of my life touching a rock that had built up charge, and that's saying something as ive put my finger in a mains, while pulling the wall panel off that had the mains box, the main fuse was out and there was an electricion infront of the box and the main fuse he'd taken out and left it on, and through that I still held onto the panel, manurvored and when the sparky and another guy on my left had a grip of the wall panel took my finger out, and another time, I put a key in a powerpoint socket in Australia and held on for a couple of seconds. and that friggin rock at greenbushes that had probably been build charge because of its superstructure, great mix of quartz, some sort black rock and goodness knows. oh and by the way I could do with some simple blueprints of tube chambering system simple for someone with a lathe, and about the size of of a beer, fizzle dink pop, ommm fresh start now where were we. :)
Anakan Zillionaire and u could do an outside chambering that seperates the hydrogen and oxygen ie diferent chamberings, then remix at end for perfect air to hydrogen mix ratio for best burn in a combustion engine. size variance table on size of carberetta based on size of engine output, for maximum efficency. ommm, go make a tea or some such thing.
Is it hho or only steam? How can you tell?
Steam of hho
Love your video but I'd love to see you turn that into an induction heat please you can do it an update me please you will them be a certified genius
Ok, so what? The goal is to have spontaneous electrolysis to create hydrogen enough so it an be used to power something .
with such design, amounts of produced HHO doubtable, you need bubbler anyway, without any measuring - child style game only, if you get that with 1wt power in - will be interesting, with 1kWt everything intresting...
some time electrolisys looking good, but when you burn gas in flame - results almost nothing, even cannot melt thin iron wire
look here: ruclips.net/video/0tzEsNhHPQU/видео.html
and this -300VDC NaOH water solution : ruclips.net/video/CAFGIxDTvq8/видео.html
Hydrogen fuel produced from high voltage electrolysis charged by orbital solar power will be the solution to energy following the Peak Oil
Nope. Aint do dat. With high voltage will instantly burn the hydrogen, ths is silly method
You're mad, Doctor!
And what is the point of this?? i dont see a car running with it.....
No just to product some HHO
شكرا فكرة جميلة، ولكن أردت أن أسأل كم فولت مستعمل
5000 فولت 0.4 امبير
Use a diode that can handle the voltage and amps
Microwaves already have those. A bridge rectifier is installed between the transformer and magnetron when it comes out of the factory.
Tom Hoehler Some have bridge rectifiers, some have a single diode. The microwave I took apart a few months ago had a single diode.
Great now how about a double low voltage cathode to make HHO and the same cathodes used with capacitor discharge ignition system to burn a mixture of choise 25/1 air fuel ratio at 22/1 compression ratio like dual fuel engines run. So I can put it in my hot rod and get twice the horsepower with a tiny bit of fuel. Figure that out and we can resurrect our old Hot Rods possibly run them on straight Alcohol. Make an h--l of an aircraft engine too!!!!!
You will melt the motor cylinder!
DING!
That isn't really safe...
use instead of the sprak big electrodes
Super dangerous
v?
looks like you are burning all the produced gases and the only outcome is steam...
@mamun
if you want to get the plans
to build your own HHO kit
go to Google search for
"Top HHO Gas Car Research"
Click the first result ( Skip the advertisement)
i like the ding.
A MOT is AC
thanks
Now add baking soda to water ..
Nice light show but you should know that you're merely boiling water.
Actually he's splitting it
Actually he is only heating that water since he is using AC, to split water you need DC.
I DID NOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING I DONT EVEN KNOW HOW DID HE MAKE IT
Maybe you are attracted to the ASMR.
dangerous ? ... NAAAAA
I been using my microwave all wrong lol
yes thanks i know that !
The water injection spark plug was invented in the late 80's but the inventor got killed. Forget his name. But so many years and not that much progress wonder why? Hope the common person can power their own vehicles and soon anti gravity through Victor Shauberger's inventions must happen. Let go people - to the drawing boards.
do you mean '' lets go people to the drawing boards.''
+Luke Stanley Meyer
THINK OF NIKOLAS TESLA!
Do not do this experiment with an aluminum foil hat on.
a mot is 2kV
MOT has more power 2kw or amperage with high voltage but pulsed DC high voltage with low amperage or 25w is safe
@@nageshji8771 hell this is a while ago
However out of the box a MOT is AC and 2kV (volt) RMS (i see i also commented it's AC somewhere) but before it goes to the magnetron it gets doubled to about 4.6 kV DC with some severe ripple
i commented that back in the day as i didn't think about the fact it is rectified and doubled (the cap and diode essentially act as a halfwave rectifier and voltage doubler) so i'm sure it's correct what he says in the description (~5kV at 400mA)
You are bonkers if you expect this to be a practical application for anything but a giggle.....you have no idea of what you are doing.
This is Soo che