AIG, ICR, CMI, Genesis Apologetics.....all of you guys rock. You've helped me to see through the fog of lies that this world has fed us. Thank you so much
@razark9 So, how can a person know if their beliefs are self-serving to their interests or whims? How do you know your beliefs don't just serve your whims?
@@razark9scientists have the same evidence, all have bias, all interpret data in their areas. The biblical account fits with archeology, history, geology, genetics, psychology, and personally, that this universe is brilliantly designed by an intelligent and beautiful mind. First humans created flawless. But given free will so gave up finding out what it would be like to live in a death free existence, for the opportunity to know the exciting and titillating knowledge of evil and rebellion. Hence here we live, in moral and material corruption and death cycle. Now the loving creator offers Himself to give us a new birth, a new creation, new beginning. Those who choose life with the creator go into the new remade renewed, deathless, painless body and creation, those who don't can follow the path to where it leads. So we freely choose, life or death.
God bless every Christian, God bless every Christian ,Teacher, Doctor, Leader, King, Minister, Missionary, Soldiers, Pastor, President, Sciencetic,Schooler and all others, thank you, Praise The Lord Jesus Christ ,Amen
Dr. Jensen, please please please remain completely transparent and let the evidence continue to speak for itself. Please guard against what the other side is doing. ThankYou so much and I will be rewatching this video several times. ThankYou
@@GeoRyukaiser he did a fine job explaining this, both scientifically and biblically. The cognitive dissonance is with the one who doesn't have ears to hear. "The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned." ~1 Corinthians 2:14
The earth is estimated to end about 4.5 billion years from now when the sun engulfs it. The word of god will be used for toilet paper way before that and all religion will be just a historical curiosity.
I'm a young earth creationist, and I love this channel and what you do. This video is complex and complicated for the average person to understand. Ken Hovid and Ken ham have great videos and do a good job explaining things. Shorter less complex videos reach more people.
@@LordMathiouswhy do you believe people that came to america on September 3 1946 they created the cia and nasa. you believe them so Hitler is your father. he controls your beliefs. facts
Why would you adhere to a world view like YEC when it can't even explain observed reality? And has problems that even the men mentioned can't find solutions too, like the Noah's Flood Heat Problem?
Dr. Jeanson...your work is cutting edge and poses a realistic challenge to commonly held beliefs of the scientific community and archeology. Thank you Dr. Jeanson and AIG for making these findings possible and available to all seeking the truth.
@@ji8044people were more genetically pure and died less likely than now, also at childbirth. Diseases weren't that much existant as nowadays. Noah descended from generations that were more pure and thus were likely to lived longer (apart from external influences). If you change birth rate to 3 (or even 2,75) and maybe extend the time period by 1000 years, it would still be waaaay much more plausibele than the 100.000/200.000 years you are working with. Agree or not, I think you have to recognize he has a point regarding population growth in combination with population and time scale from the time of Joseph (bronze age). Population size grew exponentially and is being underscored by the number of mutation rates that are in line with those growth rates. History says something about earlier history. For instance, regarding recent history he showed the influence of the Mongols and Romans on population growth and number of mutations shows clearly in quite detail what happened. See his other video's or his book (traced) for more details. I don't think you read into the topic and I don't think you are a scientist if you just give a comment based on a 20min video while not doing any proper research into the topic.
@jockyoung4491 You're just saying stuff. Dr. Jeanson is a scientist. I've read 2 of his books, and plenty of other relevant research and literature. Just because YOU don't see how things are related doesn't mean he isn't making sense. You're mind is made up; you aren't interested in learning a new way to see the history of the world. So why are you here?
@@ji8044 None of the points he made lacked a basis in science or history. They are confirmed by recorded history AND genetics, as well as archaeology. You clearly don't understand that there are competing interpretations within science. Your attempt to "refute" his growth rate is nonsensical. He didn't say every couple had 3.66 children. He said a growth rate of 3.66 would be necessary. That means an average of 3.66 children survived. So tell me, which growth rate would you accept? 1 child per couple? 4 children per couple? Or do you believe h umanity has no growth rate? You are superimposing your evolutionary view of history onto Jeanson's points and complaining that they don't line up. They aren't supposed to line up. This is groundbreaking research that is showing us that the popular understanding of slow and gradually evolving civilizations is flawed.
I agree with your ideas and methods are spot on,( DNA does not lie) Most people do not realize that there has been more than one Dark Age, where lots of knowledge were lost.
Hi His genealogy goes back to Adam and Eve so does everybodies! Shalom to us only in Christ Yeshua returning soon to reign over His creation from Jerusalem forever.
I really enjoy and appreciate his work and commitment to honoring God’s Word. If I could request just one small thing, it would be to pace your speech, pausing if even briefly between ideas or sentences. It’s a lot of info and difficult at least for me to keep up.
One thing that comes to my mind is when archaeologists come across a pile of rocks and determine that they were created by primitive people. But God said 'when you make an altar, make it of unhewn stone'.
@@jockyoung4491 Then why to scientists say that our ancestors derived from apes could use tools and build things. You haven't a clue about what scientists are saying apparently.
@@alantasman8273 Those aren't the same things. Our ancestor did use stone tools back at least 2.5 million years, but that was for butchering and cooking. Nobody built permanent structures until after the Ice Age. Why don't you know this? It is widespread common knowledge
@@ji8044what you're trying to say is he didn't combined evolution with his teaching so in your mind it couldn't be true. No bias in your comments at all. Lol
@@ji8044seems to me like you'll accept mathematical equations for all kinds of things with no other evidence beyond the math. As long as it equals to evolution you're ok with it.
@@RobertA-oi6hwExactly ! With covid mathematical models were used to justify lockdowns. As long as one uses them in conjunction with the narrative of the moment 😂
I'm an old earth creationist. As such I believe that God, being all powerful and all knowing, experiences time in a different way. One "day" for him is hundreds of millions if not billions of years. So each "day" in genesis is equal to billions of years.
@@geraldzimmerman6690 God gave us the ability of our rational mind as well as free will so that we could truly understand and be in awe at what he did to allow the universe to exist and bring it to order.
It’s funny the world says humans were primitive and most basic of form in the beginning. But my belief is that we were actually the most purist/advance/PERFECT @ the point of creation. The world says that we have progressed but in my opinion we have regressed since the garden. I believe as technology increases our connection to God decreases (speaking of the masses) and we lose touch with who we actually are and what we are purpose is here in earth. 😅
Everything all life all atoms every molecule is in decline. Nothing is increasing in life. Except one. The expectation of death. All nature is becoming more hostile to life. Every food losing nutrients all humans become more prone to disease and death. Totally opposite evilution.
Yes, if we are so advance then how come we still do not know for sure how the pyramids were built. Ancient people were not necessarily primitive and unintelligent just because they did not live by our standards.
@@razark9 -- Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Not one single person, place, or event in history mentioned in the Bible has ever been proved to have not existed or taken place.
@@ji8044 -- There are a goodly number of PhD scientists, many of whom are/were geologists, who do (or did before they passed away) accept the factuality of a world-wide flood.
If possible could you help explain how it was possible for Cain to be running or hiding from humans due to the curse set on him by God because of him murdering his brother Abel out of jealousy. I am asking because how is it possible for Cain to run and hide from others and marry someone else that is not directly related to Adam unless I am misunderstanding or misreading this part of the bible? A video on this would be appreciated.
I wouldn’t ever support or endorse inbreeding but it’s quite amusing how atheists can’t accept that concept of early humans but are cool with their ancestors being a bunch of inbred apes.
Just to add a small side point, if a person does not believe the average birthrate would be 3.66 or more, then move to a province in the Philippines. I recently moved here and my wife has 8 siblings. Her neighbor on one side has 5 siblings. Her neighbor on the other side has 4 siblings. My neighbor has 9 children. My other neighbor has 4 siblings. When there is a poor, uneducated (no offense to my neighbors), and not taught about safe sex (using condoms, etc), then children pop out of everyone in the community. I am one who is doing, on the most part, well financially only have one child. I waited until I was financially stable before I had a child. In poor countries, for some reason, they pump out lots of children. It makes no logical sense to me because I know children cost a lot to raise. But poor people use children as labor, they live together to cut down on rent cost, etc. So, children to poor people are like financial security. They can help on the farm, small store, help the parents when older, etc. Anyway, the point is, 3.66 children per family is extremely realistic and plausible.
I believe the biblical story on everything God says in his Word. Some people still have look like neandrathals. God loves us all no matter who we are and what we look like. Love you all.
We have family history traceable to tower of Babylon … ancient grandpa was bricklayer on second shift .. Tuesday afternoon he he said goodbye to grandma in Hebrew ..everyone spoke Hebrew - then at 7:00 the tower collapsed and 7:01 grandpa started speaking Portuguese - unfortunately grandma was speaking Chinese now .. their now Navaho speaking neighbor came to their house asking if gramps or grandma seen his Norwegian speaking wife .. zany days back in Babylon - easily the worst Tuesday in history ..
I saw an article from “Answers in Genesis” a few years back that explained that Neanderthals are simply the men and women that were still living to extreme ages, basically pre-flood peoples, who’s bones develop into the classic Neanderthal size and proportion due to their advanced aging. The name “Neanderthal” really needs to be divorced from our nomenclature because that’s a label that was given through a secular system. A place in Germany where an example of these bones were found.
@@jockyoung4491 It is my opinion that they are nothing more than the product of genetic manipulation by the Watcher class angels that left their habitat (realm) to marry the daughters of men and eventually father the species of hybrid beings known as the Nephilim. Minotaurs, satyrs, centaurs and other half man half beast-like creatures did exist at one point, but unfortunately we're told that these were nothing more than mythological creatures. If you're interested in this subject I highly recommend reading the first book of Enoch. “…they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish…” Enoch 7:5. Here is the genetic manipulation. When The Bible says in Genesis that all flesh became corrupt this is one of the main reasons why and how it happened. Mankind has been trying to play God by gene splicing and combining animal and human DNA 🧬 for quite some time now but this is nothing new. They were doing it in the days of Noah and they are doing it now.
@@josemartin1727 Lol, "when the bible says...", that's all you really can do eh? Let's take this bronze age tale for granted as truth, although no one even knows who wrote e.g. the OT texts, to then from that unsubstantiated presupposition, assume even more myth and unsubstantiated crap. Really, "in the days of Noah humans were doing genetic experiments" ... :)
I'm not sure about the theory of them being very old humans, but evidence supports that neanderthals were the same species as us, with different traits from isolation.. just as we still can see such variations among humans (there are standard examples of variations between 'races' but one could also think of groups still living very separate, such as the pygmy tribe) or how dogs can look totally different due to loss of genetic information (chihuahua vs poodle vs wolf, for example). This is why we could reproduce with "neanderthals" and have fertile offspring. Archeological evidence supports similar cultures to us as well (burial rites, etc). There's a lot of evidence to think neanderthals weren't our ancestors, but rather they were people like us who looked a bit different. I think our dates are all wrong too which complicates everything - human artifacts have been found in layers they supposedly don't belong, and tools labeled as being from the earliest humans or our "not fully human ancestors" are identical to those still made by people in more remote areas of the world. I don't think anyone would dare argue that those people aren't fully human or are any less intelligent, though. We know so very little, but I do know the secular theory is nonsense and there's an abundance of evidence to discredit it, they just refuse to alter their view and instead try desperately to force the discoveries to fit their awful theories. The evidence also suggests there were indeed ape-like creatures who lived alongside our ancestors, but they themselves are not our ancestors and were not human.
In the book of Job it talks briefly about a group of people who are living in caves. Could these be people and the book of Job be from the time period that is being discussed here?
Let us ALL come unto Christ...or come CLOSER unto Him..... 14 Yea, verily I say unto you, if ye will COME UNTO ME YE SHALL HAVE ETERNAL LIFE. Behold, mine arm of mercy is extended towards you, and whosoever will come, him will I receive; and blessed are those who come unto me. 15 Behold, I AM JESUS CHRIST THE SON OF GOD. I created the heavens and the earth, and all things that in them are. I was with the Father from the beginning. I am in the Father, and the Father in me; and in me hath the Father glorified his name.
Fascinating and thanks for posting 👍 I wonder too if God periodically "injects" abilities and features into humanity, so as to "elevate" our condition as needs arise (ex. the dawn of language, inspired ideas, etc). Thoughts anyone? 👀
@@t2squared Good point. I was thinking on an anthropological basis, but then if the Ark & the Flood are true, we're back to negating Darwinism once again 🤔
@@melanielinkous8746 imo it would probably NOT be stuff God didn't want us to know, but they were telling about it out of order and out of context from what God wanted though. (e.g. saying Heaven is located in space or smth when we know nothing about space, leading to the Tower of Babylon being attempted)
This is a facinating project and I would love to be involved in it. I hesitate to comment on here as it appears to be the land of trolls and replying to comments seems to be a waste of time. I am interested in the very low number of common ancestors in the relative recent past, and I think a lot of the individuals in the early tree may be identifiable.
@@Maximex123 This is like every History of every People or Tribe. Until Gen 11 Memories to thees true events with Variations and degenerations and more or less demonic twists and rotations and falsifications. Later their history with more and more demonic stuff. More timemline? 2036 mooving to Kenaʿan and Mizrayim, meeting with Mentuhotep II -> 430 a Jīzchāq 2011 born 2006 weaned, Hagār und Yischmāʿēʾl sent away -> 400 a 1874 Yaʿaqōb flees to the Uncle 1867 marriages 1 and 2 of 4 1867/1866 Reʾūbēn Gad and ʾĀschēr as Sebulūn and Dīnāh twins 1860 Yōsēph 1844 return 1821 moove to Mitzrayim -> 215 a 1686 Moschēh born 1694-1685 Sobekhotep IV Cha-Nefer-Re Sobekhotep IV 1646 Flight to Midejān from Meri-kau-Re Sobekhotep VII um 1646-1644 BC, the 7th-10tb after Sobekhotep IV. 1607 return after the death of Djed-hotep-Re Dedumose I?, pleas to Djed-nefer-Re Dedumose II (Timaios), 1st plague August/September 1606 7. plague January/February, 9. plague March Chamsin or Vulkan, 10. plague March/April -> 40 a 11. plague Dedumose II and his Army die at the End of the 13. Dynastie, 12. plague Hyqsos 1605 errection of the Tent of Encounter or get-together -> 600 a 1567 -> 300 a 1566-1560 conquest of the Holy Land 1546 Kūshān-Rishathajim 1267-1249 Yāʾīr 1227-1221 Yipthach 1095-1056 Shāʾūl 1056-1016 Dāwīd 1016-976 Shelōmōh 1012-1005 templeconstruction. 480 a + 114 a of evil rulers befor and after the Juges 976 Rechabʿām 1Kg 12 ->390 a 975- Jarabʿam bēn Nebat 722 Yissrāʾēl deported 606 Dānīʾēl deported 597 Yechēzqʾēl deported 586 Yerūschālajim destroyed, 3rd deportation Yehūdāh's 582 4th deportation 538 beginning of the return 445 Neh 1 -> 69×7a×360 d until Palmsonnday arround ẞukkoth 2 Yēschūaʿ born arround Chanukāh 3 magicians from Pars-a arround February 1 Hērōdēs the Great died CANGE OF THE TIMES Pēssach 11 Yēschūaʿ in the Templarea End 28 Yōchānān the Baptist January 29 baptism of the Lord Pēßach 32 Golgatha 1Kö 3,1 Pa-seba-chai-en-niut-meri-Amun Psusennes I arround 1040-arround 994 14,25 Shishak 971 Scheschonq-meri-Amun-netjer-heqa-Iunu "Sjsk"/? 946 to 924 Much to early. 2Kö 17,4 Soʾ is Sheshonq VI 727-715? Pianchi/Pije/Meriamunpianchi Men-cheper-Re 746-716 BC??? MeriAmun Osorkon IV Aa-cheper-Re-setep-en-Amun 732/730-715/713 BC??? 18,21 Schebitko/Scha ba ta ka Djed-kau-Re 716-707/706 Jer 24,30 Hes 29,2 Wah-ib-Re/Haa-ib-Re/Chophraʿ 10. February iulianic 589-570 30,32 at the further invasions in Bāb-ilani. This was his end.
Where can I find this information about African Y chromosomes possibly mutating faster? Also, why haven’t mainstream scientists considered (or have they) that the DNA of Neanderthals is too degraded to use for a comparison?
The mutation rate hasn't been measured yet is what he was saying. It should be easy enough if you get a decent population of moderately related males from different tribes and villages. This would give you the mutation rates from father to sons, but you would need to get a large sample size across different geographic areas to determine which population has a slow or fast mutation rate when compared to Europe and Asia. Mutation rate varies depending on a lot of factors, I would also hypothesize that epigenetics also participate in the mutation rates and because of the nomadic, hard struggle for survival a lot of people groups in Africa contend with, also puts genetic pressures on genetic adaptability.
There is no such information because it is a silly idea. Why would mutation rates differ between continents? And the idea of degradation was pulled out of nowhere.
@@jockyoung4491they would differ, most likely due to environmental factors. Things like temperature and diet can switch "on" or "off" certain genes. That would be a simplistic and not all encapsulating example.
@@rabidrooster6525 That has nothing to do with the mutation rate. The mutation rate measures the neutral base-pair point mutations thar are fairly constant background error rates. But we don't have to rely on African data, since we have modern humans in Asia dating back over 40,000 years.
I am sorry people are answering you that do know actually know the answer. So here you go… First the two studies that evo’s use to get their old dates from. They basically come from two published studies which explicitly attempt to obtain the pedigree-based per-generation mutation rate for the Y chromosome (Helgason et al. 2015; Xue et al. 2009). Both studies use low coverage sequencing scanning and only found a few mutations. Thus; they believed y chr Adam lived long ago. Later came Poznik et al. (2016) who compared low coverage versus high coverage sequences in 143 individuals. They discovered that missing DNA variants are found throughout the Y chromosome tree. They decided to do more studies using high coverage sequencing scanning on the Y chromosome and guess what? these variants are found in nearly all samples! Meaning they missed them in earlier pedigree studies. Since the total number of mutations between fathers and sons is already low/is already a rare event, a discovery of even 10 additional mutations via high coverage sequencing could have a dramatic impact on the per-generation mutation rate-and the creation/ evolution debate. To date, two high coverage Y chromosome sequencing studies have been published in which pedigree-based mutation rate data are available (Karmin et al. 2015; Maretty et al. 2017). Both studies filtered their sequencing data via versions of previously published filters. Meaning, they obtained YEC results but filtered that out by combining it with older slower mutation rates to get evolutionary results. Maretty et al. (2017) published a Y chromosome tree based on the sequence differences found on the XDG region of their male participants. Karmin et al. (2015) utilized a variety of filters, one of which (“filter c”) was explicitly based on the filters utilized by Wei et al. (2013) and Poznik et al. (2013). Basically jeanson found in these studies that an average of three mutations per generation are handed down in the Y chromosome. This means when we’re looking at people today who have a total of 446 mutations then it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that only about 150 generations ago Y-chromosome Adam lived which makes him Noah.
I really enjoyed the presentation, but there is a bit at the beginning about the evolutionist viewpoint of man's ancestors being "Not, capable, advanced, or intelligent." From everything I have seen, evolutionists do not claim this. Instead they claim that human ancestors were making stone tools more than 3 million years before modern humans were on the scene, and that stone technology radically improved over that time, but modern humans perfected it before the agricultural revolution changed everything.
I was just reading Genesis 25 in my devotional. Two verses stood out to me 25 And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau. 27 And the boys grew: and Esau was a cunning hunter, a man of the field; and Jacob [was] a plain man, dwelling in tents. So Esau was a hairy man who dwelled in the fields as a hunter. This to me sounds exactly like the Neanderthal cave dwelling hunter society as portrayed in history books. Could it be that Esau/Edom was those that are now identified as Neanderthalers?
Interesting thanks. It is also interesting you use a pic of a person trying to light a fire with friction. - What inspired the first person, to rub two sticks together for so long they ignited? It's not as if it is a natural thing to do is it? (Then the intelligence to see it's value. So they weren't dumb. Just didn't know.) Then the advances of making it easier using very dry items. Yeah, my knowledge is lacking. I just hit my gas lighter ignitor ands away it goes. But you should get the idea. - What humanity had was curiosity. What stopped curiosity were those societies who had kings or emperors who were the offspring of Gods. Only they could be inspired by the divine. Not the plebs on the streets below. And just plain lack of knowledge about everything. And the time to look and learn.
Love this new series ❤ saw a video attempting to debunk your findings. Anyway you can explain the difference between mutations and fixation please? This difference was used to try to discredit your findings.
Mutations are what lead to fixation. Meaning, let’s say you live in a tribe with 10 people. The next generation there’s a new mutation. It wouldn’t take very long for that mutation to be in every single person of that tribe after a few generations. The larger, the population, the harder it is for a mutation to reach fixation. This is why we find an explosion of New haplogroups early on, and mostly in the Middle East exactly where we would expect to find this explosion after the tower of babel. So the critics try and say that because most studies focus on the mutation rate, and not a substitution rate (which is how fast a mutation reaches fixation), then jeanson must be wrong. But this is ridiculous, because many of these studies state that the substitution rate is about the same as the mutation rate. As a matter fact, Parsons who ran the two largest pedigree studies ever said that the substitution rate shows mtdna Eve lived 6,500 years ago and a year later did another pedigree study to double check these findings with someone name Holland. The results were exactly the same. It is his mutation rate that is used by the FBI so it is highly accurate. The critics have run out of argument. At this point all they can try and do now is invoke that selection was higher in the past, and it is today and that’s probably why there’s a difference. Rescue device after rescue device with these people it never ends.
@@YoungEarthCreation No, mutations are fixed in small populations by genetic drift (random events), not more mutations. Having the exact same mutation again is extremely unlikely.
@@YoungEarthCreation oh ok I get it. When analyzing the genetics of a certain population, if a group of people all have the same mutation, then obviously that mutation has reached fixation. Thank you, thank you thank you for caring your cross through the narrow gate for us. 😉❤️
@@URBLuvd exactly right! And if we look let’s say at a population of islanders and they all have the same mutation, that means they are more Genetically related to one another than a group that does not. That means they share the same haplogroup. It’s just another name for a Mutation that has reached fixation in a population. It also means if we test people around the world and find a group With that same Mutation somewhere else, it means they must have sailed and migrated off the island at some time in the past and colonized. So mutations make a great way to track people and also determine when an event happened based on mutation / substitution rates.
You could add the Biblical fact that the first few generations off the Ark had extremely long life spans. If my lifespan is 3-5 times longer than today's norm, it stands to reason that the generational mutation rate should be 3-5 times greater. Sons born near the end of my life might have more mutations than the ones born near the start of my life. They would look like descendants of their brothers, would they not?
@@ji8044nailed it.. that is still mysterious.. the life span was even lower than what we are today.. otherwise the rate of growth would have been too high..
@@ji8044at's absolutely untrue. Some sumarian kings were said to have ruled for well over a hundred years. Of course the secular world rules this out as mythology automatically though. Sumer IS the biblical 'shinar' the sumarian king En merker was likely the biblical nimrod and ruled for well over 400 years. En merker also means great Hunter. As was nimrod. En merker was also building a tower when the languages got confused by the angry got 'enki'. This is all written in stone tablets. Enmerker aka nimrod was the grandfather of gilgamesh, who also lived for a very long time and had a rule of over a hundred years. The epic of Gilgamesh also contains the noahic flood story with striking similarity. Sumar was the cradle of civilisation even in the secular world and its that fits the biblical narrative p3rfectly because it was also exactly were the first cities were build after the flood. these long lifespans dropped drastically though as can be seen in the biblical patriarchs. And not ,any generations after this would have loved very long. Sumarian history as stated on tablets even mentions kings before the flood, yes thats right the sumarians documented the global flood.
@@owenduck We rule it out as mythology because there's not a shred of evidence supporting these stories to be factual (people living for hundreds of years). But here's the real trouble with your mental gymnastics and presuppositionalism. If you take an ancient story to be factually true, then you can't but take them all for true. And hence, you should also accept truth in all creation (and other) myths once written across the globe by all civilizations that ever lived. Since that is preposterous, we stick to real evidence, archeology, etcetera.
I believe in the bible and don’t intend to change my mind or listen to someone trying to change my mind my belief s are older than me I accept the bible as true
Yes the bible give me the information that God created the earth and mankind this for me is true as I believe in the bible . I live by faith in the word to doubt is to deny the truth written within it.
So did Native Americans, Australian Aborigines, Polynesian people, Vikings, etc. all travel to Egypt during the famine of Joseph. Or had people not yet spread across the planet until after Joseph’s famine?
Australian Aboriginals didn’t travel anywhere. They’ve lived in what we now call Australia in relative isolation for more than 60k years. They did not travel to Egypt.
You need to take into account survival of those kids. And/or how many wives? As most/many wives and kids, died. At a guess because that is all I have, triple or more, may be required. Remember even as close as our grandparents the death of wives in birth was significant. Grandfather on my fathers side had three wives all two died. And I'm not sure if the third had children. That question popped up just now. To add to the confusion. Most uncles and my father had 4 kids. One uncle had 14, a few sets of twins. While the only aunty had none.
Actual mitochondrial DNA dating using real DNA samples from families like the Russian Romanoff family, the mutation age converges at approximately 6000 years ago. What are the odds?
Are you contending that persons from Europe, sub-Saharan Africa, the Far East, southern Asia, southeast Asia, Australia, and the Americas went to Egypt for food during the 7-year famine described in Genesis?
Dr. Jeanson Thank you for your dedication in to this research. Mind blowing to say the least. I have 2 items that other researchers have done. One is L.A. Marzulli looking into elongated skulls and there DNA. The other is Dave Paulides, looking at big foot. Both have tested DNA and found only the DNA from the women side. The father's side unknown.
So once again I need to point out some problems. First this is being told by an apologist that has not published this information to any scientific journals. If you don’t publish to scientific journals, no one can point out that you correct or wrong in your hypothesis. So another problem is that birth rates where higher when we had no contraception. At the same time death rates were extremely high because there was no modern medicine. Most children died in infancy and few people lived to be 20 or older. There are many other issues, but I can’t write a paper every time AiG puts out a video. Last I will say if you truly believe in God and Jesus. Then even when you look outside of AiG it should only affirm and strengthen your faith. Sky ~ Your friendly Atheist.
I'm sure anyone else who has the means to check this will do so. Peoples faith in scientists are waiting since there is evidence of studies getting bought out for an agenda. I'm don't doubt there were times and locations that made it hard for the survival of babies, but I doubt it was as ubiquitous as some say.
Most people have no clue how hard it is to have a paper viewed by scientific peers and proven. Just imagine all of the years in which people dedicated their time, money, and resources were wasted. I don't think “birth rates” would be, at all, a factor. On the other hand, If “death rates were extremely high” and “there was no modern medicine,” is problematic for the evolutionist because how do we expect Neanderthals to survive for 200,000 years with “death rates were extremely high” and without any knowledge of medicine? Also, if “Most children died in infancy” the region in which earlier Neanderthals communalized would have shown signs of “evidence” of transitional ape-to-man fossils.
@@jockyoung4491 Enjoy being in the dark about scientific issues. Just keep looking for those missing links that aren't there while real scientists follow the science to where it leads them unencumbered by evolutionist dogma.
Populations advance when energy becomes concentrated, especially the types of energy that are beneficial to humans. One early way to do this is with planting crops. The crops capture energy from the sun, use that energy the gather resources from the earth, the produce the yield. Then human harvest the product of that energy. Something similar can be said with live stock. The great change that started with the industrial revolution was one: the concentration of human productive effort into increasingly larger cities, and the various forms of steam power. As energy becomes more abundant and accessible the population can increase more easily. It's not a factor of evolution. It's a factor of energy and it applies to nearly all life. Once the energy source is remove, whether it be crops, livestock, or later forms of energy production, the population will rapidly decline.
Dr. Jeanson and audience, please read Immanuel Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision. It is not anti-Christian. It was open on Einstein's desk when he died in 1955. Please read it because it touches on the worldwide famine and deliverance of Moses and his followers. Please read it. Great research. Great explanation of everything.
After Noah's flood, the continents separated. If everyone got off the boat in Turkey, how did people end up in North and South America? Please and thank you
What two lines of Noah are you finding? It makes a difference from the biblical account of curse's and blessings that night Noah gave to his son's. Shem and Japheth were to spend some time living in the tents while Ham departed from them right away. Is it possible that one of the lines is actually two that converged before Japheth moved his group further North and started dealing with the colder climates?
Ron Wyatt in his pursuit of Noah's Ark led to the discovery of the where the Ark came to rest and where Noah is to believed to have settled. He was led by locals to large stones that had carvings in the stones, which depicted 8 characters that represent that story. This idea your pushing sounds fowl to me. I believe Ron Wyatt gives a compelling explanation and you should watch his video.
Great information but I wish you people would give the flat earth theory and serious look. I can show anyone exactly how the Bible describes the shape and nature of the earth. I can Biblically show you the reason that the shape and nature of the earth has been hidden. The Bible is a flat earth book from cover to cover and until you open your eyes to at least explore it, I do not believe that you can continue to make the claim that you see the Scriptures honestly and believe them.
You do realize that not everyone interprets scripture the same, right? Just because one Christian or a group of them does not share your view or interpretation of scripture it does not mean that they do not believe the Bible or are not Christians. For example: Many Christians believe that eventually even after Death & Judgement, that everyone will be saved through and by Jesus Christ. On the other side... There many Christians that believe that those who have rejected Jesus while on Earth will spend an eternity being tormented in the Lake of Fire. I have also met Christians that reject Young Earth Models and instead believe Day = Age models, therefore they believe that the Earth is Millions, Billions (whatever) of years old. There are Christians who claim that unless you talk in tongues that you do not have the Holy Spirit within you and therefore you are not a true Christian. Christians, regardless of what they believe read from the same book (Bible) and believe that book! What they believe that book teaches is another discussion altogether. Simply stated: Answers in Genesis may not believe that the Bible teaches a flat Earth or even a Geo-Centric model of our Solar System. Most if not all RUclips channels will only share and teach about views that they embrace as true. I hope this puts things in perspective.
I almost fell for flat earth. Then I met someone who took their own airplane AROUND the world on their own. Hard to believe something that isn’t when something that is, well, is.
Do note that not all parts of the Bible are speaking literally, some are also figurative. Also, basic reasoning can defeat many physics-related arguments for FE. For example, the absence of gravity, with it being replaced by density and buoyancy. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. If you push down on something, it'll push back. If it doesn't push back hard enough to stop you, you'll keep going down. If it does stop you, you stay still. Density of mass measured against the density of some other mass determines buoyancy. But what would cause the downward force, if density is how close together matter is, and buoyancy an effect of density and the aforementioned force together? Well gravity, but it supposedly doesn't exist. Why? Because water doesn't stick to an orange like it sticks to the globe. But there's a problem with the orange experiment: It's done on the globe. If everything in the universe consisted of the orange and the water, the water would very slowly drift towards the orange. And since it doesn't make sense for gravity not to exist, it does exist. And since it exists, a flat earth would be a very unstable shape, and it would collapse in on itself, forming a sphere. Why would God make the laws of physics not fit one of His best creations, or vice versa? anyway pointless rant (otherwise known as a waste of 15 minutes of my time) over
This is the definition of "blinding with science" ...and excellent examples of subjective reasoning, probability bias and so many more flawed reason models. Wake up people
I have a question to Christians… do you believe God created the world in a literal 7 day week? All work done in 6 24 hour days, and rest on the last day. Do you believe this is how he did it? This was a thought exercise, if you don’t believe God did it how he literally said he did, and trust the billions of years theory of science, how on earth do you believe anything in the bible! You already chose not trust the first book. You have been deceived.
I'll participate in this exercise. Yes, I do believe God created the world in 6 literal days (dark/light, evening/morning cycles) I don't know if they were exactly 24 hours, but probably close, give or take. To those who disbelieve in Creation Week, I present the 4th Commandment which God wrote on a rock WITH HIS FINGER!!! “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God. In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates. For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.
God is the one true God...so If the one just and Holy God said He did it in six literal days....He did it in six literal days....otherwise we can say that He is not God and He cannot create in a fashion that suits His glory
To me your argument is pointless. It doesn't matter. I wasn't around when God created everything visible and invisible. No one was. What's recorded in the biblical account says what it says. Life goes on. My faith is secure in Jesus Christ. I guess I'm blessed with not having the need for God to be proven to me on a purely intellectual level. He revealed Himself to me and I believe Him. I hope and pray for those who don't have the experience of meeting God.
@@winniecash1654 How is his argument pointless when his argument is if you don't take the first book literally how can you believe the rest of the Bible? That is not a pointless argument that is a well founded question about our beliefs as Christians! It makes total sense that if you don't believe the first book how can you believe the rest of the Bible, this is confusing to you?
@@timsgta for me it doesn't affect my faith. It might for some people. I see it as a need to know issue. The Bible doesn't say something about everything. It's also not a scientific book. Does it mention science? Yes. Is it solely written as a book on science? No. Does it mention history? Yes. Is it a book written specifically for history? No. Does it mention sociology? Yes. Etc. Hopefully you see the pattern. Do I believe Genesis? Yes. But if it was 7 literal 24 hour days or epochs of time, it doesn't matter to me. Could that really matter to some people? Yes. But I don't have an issue with it, as I already mentioned. If anyone is really all that interested in my perspective, it more or less goes along with that of the late Michael Heiser. His books and yt videos are many, and there are few things he talks about that I disagree with.
If Adam and Eve visited with God every day, isn't it more possible that their knowledge was more advanced than ours? Also, isn't it possible that when the fallen angels were living with men, that they imparted knowledge and the civilization was more advanced than we are now? And, we have progressed and declined in knowledge since that time as sickness, weather and wars have destroyed civilizations over time?
************Studying and learning from science is amazing. TRUE science is OF God. But we must realize there will always be things we don't understand. Set our spiritual and educational foundation of the Rock of God******** 12 And now, my sons, remember, remember that it is upon THE ROCK OF OUR REDEEMER, WHO IS CHRIST, the Son of God, that ye must build your foundation; that when the devil shall send forth his mighty winds, yea, his shafts in the whirlwind, yea, when all his hail and his mighty storm shall beat upon you, it shall have no power over you to drag you down to the gulf of misery and endless wo, because of the rock upon which ye are built, which is a sure foundation, a foundation whereon if men build they cannot fall.
God gave us the ability of our rational mind as well as free will so that we could truly understand and be in awe at what he did to allow the universe to exist and bring it to order.
The Bible does say little about the pre-Noahic Flood peoples other than to recount genealogies, craftsmanship and cities built. Also, the environmental issues, like higher air pressures, higher oxygen levels and mist from the ground instead of rain are lightly touched upon. The Bible also states that the thoughts of man before the Flood ...like today...were evil continuously. What we do know from the building of the Ark is that man at that time was very smart. They had the benefit of institutional memory from individuals that in some instances lived for almost 1000 years. So in the 1600 to 2000 yrs before the flood man could have made tremendous accomplishments as have been accomplished by post flood man in the last 4400 years. It would be interesting to get a better picture of how pre-flood humans lived. Out of Place artifacts found in coal seams and items dug up when digging wells attest to early man's skills. The Ark Encounter has a hall addressing this.
💯 based on all of those details plus fallen angels interacting with and teaching humans, it’s likely that pre-Flood man had what we would consider to be post-modern technology
@@terranceramirez4816 And, according to the Bible, if we all spoke one language there would be a structure, made of bricks and slim, well above what modern architecture has achieved, just a tad over a half mile.
@@elmercoblentz9432 and Babylon has been conquered several times over since then so I’m sure that structure has suffered immense damage and is no longer standing as such
@@giak7525 Why do you assume angels had no bodies? Angels (fallen and unfallen) CAN assume bodily form. Scripture tells us that they ate, interacted with, and looked like regular people. Otherwise, the men of Sodom wouldn't have wanted at them so badly.
I like your comment about people advancing then going primitive. We have fairly recent examples of what could have happened to conquered peoples. After WWI Germany and Japan were in shambles. We could have left them that way, or made them even worse then at the end of the war, and their cultures would have regressed considerably. However, we "Allied" powers chose to help rebuild them, so they therefore did not regress.
I'm the thumbs down. You do realize that the stories in your bible are found in even older stories. Humans have always enjoyed story telling. Your "new discoveries" will forever occupy the minds of a small audience. Best wishes.
It's frightening how they incorporate some of the scientific data and twist it into propaganda almost effortlessly, and I wouldn't say they have a large audience but all these people in the comments are their victims and it saddens me deeply
Make sure you deny everything prior to 6,000 years ago. That would include rejecting any method that dates anything prior to 6,000 years ago. That includes all the methods and knowledge described in this video.
It's nice the way creationists like Jeanson ignore 99.9% of the scientific evidence which disproves their YEC claims and demand we only consider the 0.1% they cherry picked.
AIG, ICR, CMI, Genesis Apologetics.....all of you guys rock. You've helped me to see through the fog of lies that this world has fed us. Thank you so much
Apologeticvs is fine for faith, but it is not science. Science says very differently.
@@razark9
You bring up a good point.
Beliefs are by far the most fickle and self-serving genuine feelings a person can have.
@razark9
So, how can a person know if their beliefs are self-serving to their interests or whims?
How do you know your beliefs don't just serve your whims?
@@razark9scientists have the same evidence, all have bias, all interpret data in their areas.
The biblical account fits with archeology, history, geology, genetics, psychology, and personally, that this universe is brilliantly designed by an intelligent and beautiful mind. First humans created flawless. But given free will so gave up finding out what it would be like to live in a death free existence, for the opportunity to know the exciting and titillating knowledge of evil and rebellion. Hence here we live, in moral and material corruption and death cycle.
Now the loving creator offers Himself to give us a new birth, a new creation, new beginning. Those who choose life with the creator go into the new remade renewed, deathless, painless body and creation, those who don't can follow the path to where it leads. So we freely choose, life or death.
@@razark9 Self describing post you got there XD
God bless every Christian, God bless every Christian ,Teacher, Doctor, Leader, King, Minister, Missionary, Soldiers, Pastor, President, Sciencetic,Schooler and all others, thank you, Praise The Lord Jesus Christ ,Amen
God bless all Christians???? Screw everybody else??? You racist, bigot, friend of Satan
Dr. Jensen, please please please remain completely transparent and let the evidence continue to speak for itself. Please guard against what the other side is doing.
ThankYou so much and
I will be rewatching this video several times.
ThankYou
How can you expect transparency when he isn't even honest about the scientific evidence of human origin?
@@GeoRyukaiser Step 1.0 According to the Gods word the Bible, he’s locked in.
@@smokeysmith1282 At this point I'm not sure if you're defending him or roasting him.
@@GeoRyukaiser he did a fine job explaining this, both scientifically and biblically. The cognitive dissonance is with the one who doesn't have ears to hear. "The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned." ~1 Corinthians 2:14
@@user-sf7ve9fm2t The quickest way to prove you don't understand an atheist is to start throwing around bible verses like that one.
Thank you for your hard work. God bless.
Just wanted to thank you for your continuing work on this subject. God is so amazing!
Whew! Thanks for the heads up! I sure don't want my mind blown!
Great work brother, heavens and earth will vanish but not the words of God.
The earth is estimated to end about 4.5 billion years from now when the sun engulfs it. The word of god will be used for toilet paper way before that and all religion will be just a historical curiosity.
Hmmm? If there is no Heavens & Earth who will speak or hear the words. 😢
@@shyquildurham9695 what words are you talking about??
@@damianabbate4423
🤔🤫🙄😮💨
@@shyquildurham9695 your statement makes no sense.
I'm a young earth creationist, and I love this channel and what you do. This video is complex and complicated for the average person to understand. Ken Hovid and Ken ham have great videos and do a good job explaining things. Shorter less complex videos reach more people.
@@LordMathiouswhy do you believe people that came to america on September 3 1946 they created the cia and nasa. you believe them so Hitler is your father. he controls your beliefs. facts
Why would you adhere to a world view like YEC when it can't even explain observed reality? And has problems that even the men mentioned can't find solutions too, like the Noah's Flood Heat Problem?
God bless you Dr. Jeanson! I love the work you do!
Dr. Jeanson...your work is cutting edge and poses a realistic challenge to commonly held beliefs of the scientific community and archeology. Thank you Dr. Jeanson and AIG for making these findings possible and available to all seeking the truth.
His points don't even connect logically. He's just saying stuff. His conclusions are in no way supported by science.
@@ji8044people were more genetically pure and died less likely than now, also at childbirth. Diseases weren't that much existant as nowadays. Noah descended from generations that were more pure and thus were likely to lived longer (apart from external influences). If you change birth rate to 3 (or even 2,75) and maybe extend the time period by 1000 years, it would still be waaaay much more plausibele than the 100.000/200.000 years you are working with. Agree or not, I think you have to recognize he has a point regarding population growth in combination with population and time scale from the time of Joseph (bronze age). Population size grew exponentially and is being underscored by the number of mutation rates that are in line with those growth rates. History says something about earlier history. For instance, regarding recent history he showed the influence of the Mongols and Romans on population growth and number of mutations shows clearly in quite detail what happened. See his other video's or his book (traced) for more details. I don't think you read into the topic and I don't think you are a scientist if you just give a comment based on a 20min video while not doing any proper research into the topic.
@@ji8044 This video refers to other videos, so you'll have to go back and watch all the references before your claims can be called scientific.
@jockyoung4491 You're just saying stuff. Dr. Jeanson is a scientist. I've read 2 of his books, and plenty of other relevant research and literature. Just because YOU don't see how things are related doesn't mean he isn't making sense. You're mind is made up; you aren't interested in learning a new way to see the history of the world. So why are you here?
@@ji8044 None of the points he made lacked a basis in science or history. They are confirmed by recorded history AND genetics, as well as archaeology. You clearly don't understand that there are competing interpretations within science. Your attempt to "refute" his growth rate is nonsensical. He didn't say every couple had 3.66 children. He said a growth rate of 3.66 would be necessary. That means an average of 3.66 children survived. So tell me, which growth rate would you accept? 1 child per couple? 4 children per couple? Or do you believe h umanity has no growth rate? You are superimposing your evolutionary view of history onto Jeanson's points and complaining that they don't line up. They aren't supposed to line up. This is groundbreaking research that is showing us that the popular understanding of slow and gradually evolving civilizations is flawed.
“Fear not ye saints of God, there’s nothing to worry about!”
I agree with your ideas and methods are spot on,( DNA does not lie)
Most people do not realize that there has been more than one Dark Age, where lots of knowledge were lost.
This is proof of another dark age and we are moving backward with this kind of bull.
Not lost, but destroyed. To bury God.
@lootusmaximus7378 islam was dark
@@BiblicalFlatEarth username checks out
HIS elect HIS beloved... where sin abounds grace abounds the more...we overcome evil with GOOD...
thank you for this series and all your work! Maranatha!
In Jesus we find where we come from and we’re we are heading everything else is deception
Dummy
Hi
His genealogy goes back to Adam and Eve so does everybodies!
Shalom to us only in Christ Yeshua returning soon to reign over His creation from Jerusalem forever.
I really enjoy and appreciate his work and commitment to honoring God’s Word. If I could request just one small thing, it would be to pace your speech, pausing if even briefly between ideas or sentences. It’s a lot of info and difficult at least for me to keep up.
Evolution is one of the greatest fairytales ever written ❤
You don't even know what it says.
You need to ask yourself why have you got a tailbone???
And no one lives happily ever after. 😢
@@Legend-mg2ry -- Another YT post that makes no sense.
One thing that comes to my mind is when archaeologists come across a pile of rocks and determine that they were created by primitive people. But God said 'when you make an altar, make it of unhewn stone'.
Paleontologists see monkey bones by those rocks and say these were our early ancestors building structures....extrapolations to the max.
@@alantasman8273 I've been to Jeremiah's tomb in Ireland. It's a giant pile of rocks. Yet he lived in 580 BC.
@@alantasman8273
Only fully modern humans built structures. You have no clue what scientists actually say , do you?
@@jockyoung4491 Then why to scientists say that our ancestors derived from apes could use tools and build things. You haven't a clue about what scientists are saying apparently.
@@alantasman8273
Those aren't the same things. Our ancestor did use stone tools back at least 2.5 million years, but that was for butchering and cooking. Nobody built permanent structures until after the Ice Age. Why don't you know this? It is widespread common knowledge
Keep up the amazing work Dr. Jeanson! Truly fascinating stuff!
@@ji8044what you're trying to say is he didn't combined evolution with his teaching so in your mind it couldn't be true. No bias in your comments at all. Lol
@@ji8044seems to me like you'll accept mathematical equations for all kinds of things with no other evidence beyond the math. As long as it equals to evolution you're ok with it.
@@RobertA-oi6hwExactly ! With covid mathematical models were used to justify lockdowns. As long as one uses them in conjunction with the narrative of the moment 😂
In Jeanson's place I would have said that Sem's and Japheth's wives have Neanderthal DNA. Ham's wive doesn't
Such awesome and amazing truth! Thank you!❤🙏
Thank you for your ministry brother!
I'm an old earth creationist. As such I believe that God, being all powerful and all knowing, experiences time in a different way. One "day" for him is hundreds of millions if not billions of years. So each "day" in genesis is equal to billions of years.
Agree!! And indeed JWST has founded billions of galaxies out there. Listen to Dr Hugh Ross!!
When we're all together in Heaven, this difference of opinion will be the of no concern. Ephesians 2 says it all.
@@geraldzimmerman6690 God gave us the ability of our rational mind as well as free will so that we could truly understand and be in awe at what he did to allow the universe to exist and bring it to order.
It’s funny the world says humans were primitive and most basic of form in the beginning. But my belief is that we were actually the most purist/advance/PERFECT @ the point of creation. The world says that we have progressed but in my opinion we have regressed since the garden. I believe as technology increases our connection to God decreases (speaking of the masses) and we lose touch with who we actually are and what we are purpose is here in earth. 😅
Adam live over 900 years, that's an incredible amount of time to learn and advance, not to mention his direct communication with God initially.
Everything all life all atoms every molecule is in decline. Nothing is increasing in life. Except one. The expectation of death. All nature is becoming more hostile to life. Every food losing nutrients all humans become more prone to disease and death. Totally opposite evilution.
Yes, if we are so advance then how come we still do not know for sure how the pyramids were built. Ancient people were not necessarily primitive and unintelligent just because they did not live by our standards.
Love AIG ❤
ALL of human history is documented in the Bible.
LOL. Obviously not.
@@razark9 -- While the Bible does not record all of human history, what it does say is accurate and trustworthy.
@@razark9 -- Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Not one single person, place, or event in history mentioned in the Bible has ever been proved to have not existed or taken place.
@@ji8044 -- There are a goodly number of PhD scientists, many of whom are/were geologists, who do (or did before they passed away) accept the factuality of a world-wide flood.
@@razark9 everything in the Bible is divinely resistant to debunking
Thank you for your work and this channel. God Bless!
This is so interesting guys. I'm glued to the video and it's normally hard to get me to watch a video this long
last 2 C's of Human history: Confusion, Chaos
If possible could you help explain how it was possible for Cain to be running or hiding from humans due to the curse set on him by God because of him murdering his brother Abel out of jealousy. I am asking because how is it possible for Cain to run and hide from others and marry someone else that is not directly related to Adam unless I am misunderstanding or misreading this part of the bible? A video on this would be appreciated.
Where or who says he didn’t hook up with a sister or niece? Could have been hundreds of them if average life span was even 500 years.
I wouldn’t ever support or endorse inbreeding but it’s quite amusing how atheists can’t accept that concept of early humans but are cool with their ancestors being a bunch of inbred apes.
Just to add a small side point, if a person does not believe the average birthrate would be 3.66 or more, then move to a province in the Philippines.
I recently moved here and my wife has 8 siblings. Her neighbor on one side has 5 siblings. Her neighbor on the other side has 4 siblings. My neighbor has 9 children. My other neighbor has 4 siblings.
When there is a poor, uneducated (no offense to my neighbors), and not taught about safe sex (using condoms, etc), then children pop out of everyone in the community.
I am one who is doing, on the most part, well financially only have one child. I waited until I was financially stable before I had a child.
In poor countries, for some reason, they pump out lots of children. It makes no logical sense to me because I know children cost a lot to raise. But poor people use children as labor, they live together to cut down on rent cost, etc.
So, children to poor people are like financial security. They can help on the farm, small store, help the parents when older, etc.
Anyway, the point is, 3.66 children per family is extremely realistic and plausible.
There were 11 children in my family, and many families in earlier times were big families.
🤯 Mind blown
Thanks AIG
Your explanation is very clear and free of fancy, long technical words that lose most of us, but yet is complete.
I believe the biblical story on everything God says in his Word. Some people still have look like neandrathals. God loves us all no matter who we are and what we look like. Love you all.
We have family history traceable to tower of Babylon … ancient grandpa was bricklayer on second shift .. Tuesday afternoon he he said goodbye to grandma in Hebrew ..everyone spoke Hebrew - then at 7:00 the tower collapsed and 7:01 grandpa started speaking Portuguese - unfortunately grandma was speaking Chinese now .. their now Navaho speaking neighbor came to their house asking if gramps or grandma seen his Norwegian speaking wife .. zany days back in Babylon - easily the worst Tuesday in history ..
😂
Incredible video!
I love this ministry! 😊
Always such interesting content!
I saw an article from “Answers in Genesis” a few years back that explained that Neanderthals are simply the men and women that were still living to extreme ages, basically pre-flood peoples, who’s bones develop into the classic Neanderthal size and proportion due to their advanced aging. The name “Neanderthal” really needs to be divorced from our nomenclature because that’s a label that was given through a secular system. A place in Germany where an example of these bones were found.
Since that obviously isn't true, you need better sources.
@@jockyoung4491 It is my opinion that they are nothing more than the product of genetic manipulation by the Watcher class angels that left their habitat (realm) to marry the daughters of men and eventually father the species of hybrid beings known as the Nephilim. Minotaurs, satyrs, centaurs and other half man half beast-like creatures did exist at one point, but unfortunately we're told that these were nothing more than mythological creatures. If you're interested in this subject I highly recommend reading the first book of Enoch. “…they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish…” Enoch 7:5. Here is the genetic manipulation. When The Bible says in Genesis that all flesh became corrupt this is one of the main reasons why and how it happened. Mankind has been trying to play God by gene splicing and combining animal and human DNA 🧬 for quite some time now but this is nothing new. They were doing it in the days of Noah and they are doing it now.
@@josemartin1727 Lol, "when the bible says...", that's all you really can do eh?
Let's take this bronze age tale for granted as truth, although no one even knows who wrote e.g. the OT texts, to then from that unsubstantiated presupposition, assume even more myth and unsubstantiated crap.
Really, "in the days of Noah humans were doing genetic experiments" ... :)
I'm not sure about the theory of them being very old humans, but evidence supports that neanderthals were the same species as us, with different traits from isolation.. just as we still can see such variations among humans (there are standard examples of variations between 'races' but one could also think of groups still living very separate, such as the pygmy tribe) or how dogs can look totally different due to loss of genetic information (chihuahua vs poodle vs wolf, for example). This is why we could reproduce with "neanderthals" and have fertile offspring. Archeological evidence supports similar cultures to us as well (burial rites, etc). There's a lot of evidence to think neanderthals weren't our ancestors, but rather they were people like us who looked a bit different.
I think our dates are all wrong too which complicates everything - human artifacts have been found in layers they supposedly don't belong, and tools labeled as being from the earliest humans or our "not fully human ancestors" are identical to those still made by people in more remote areas of the world. I don't think anyone would dare argue that those people aren't fully human or are any less intelligent, though.
We know so very little, but I do know the secular theory is nonsense and there's an abundance of evidence to discredit it, they just refuse to alter their view and instead try desperately to force the discoveries to fit their awful theories.
The evidence also suggests there were indeed ape-like creatures who lived alongside our ancestors, but they themselves are not our ancestors and were not human.
My heart hurts for all the atheists that are freely rejecting and missing out all the God offers us freely.✝
In the book of Job it talks briefly about a group of people who are living in caves. Could these be people and the book of Job be from the time period that is being discussed here?
Yes our records tell us about the socalled nonBlack people. They are our enemies.
Love this channel! Thanks guys and girls
@@rf7477no thanks. We'll keep reading our Bibles and watching videos like AIG for the truth
@@rf7477 hey rf. No thanks. I suggest you go fly a kite. 🙂
Let us ALL come unto Christ...or come CLOSER unto Him.....
14 Yea, verily I say unto you, if ye will COME UNTO ME YE SHALL HAVE ETERNAL LIFE. Behold, mine arm of mercy is extended towards you, and whosoever will come, him will I receive; and blessed are those who come unto me.
15 Behold, I AM JESUS CHRIST THE SON OF GOD. I created the heavens and the earth, and all things that in them are. I was with the Father from the beginning. I am in the Father, and the Father in me; and in me hath the Father glorified his name.
Thank you Dr. God bless you
Fascinating and thanks for posting 👍
I wonder too if God periodically "injects" abilities and features into humanity, so as to "elevate" our condition as needs arise (ex. the dawn of language, inspired ideas, etc).
Thoughts anyone? 👀
Erm maybe, I’d say he did give us amazing abilities to adapt near climates and then go back to normal when we come back to a temperate “normal” one
I'm not sure. Good question. Pretty sure fallen angels taught ancient humans knowledge that God didn't want us to know.
Solomon?
@@t2squared Good point.
I was thinking on an anthropological basis, but then if the Ark & the Flood are true, we're back to negating Darwinism once again 🤔
@@melanielinkous8746 imo it would probably NOT be stuff God didn't want us to know, but they were telling about it out of order and out of context from what God wanted though. (e.g. saying Heaven is located in space or smth when we know nothing about space, leading to the Tower of Babylon being attempted)
Can you give me some info or your thoughts about the apocrypha and do you think we should also be reading the books from this?
This is a facinating project and I would love to be involved in it. I hesitate to comment on here as it appears to be the land of trolls and replying to comments seems to be a waste of time. I am interested in the very low number of common ancestors in the relative recent past, and I think a lot of the individuals in the early tree may be identifiable.
Here, you dropped this: 🧠
From your friendly internet troll 🧌👹
Very Interesting. Thanks.
Creation 4119 BC
Flood 2263-2462
ʾAbrāhām 2111-2036
Famine 1823-1816
@@Maximex123 This is like every History of every People or Tribe. Until Gen 11 Memories to thees true events with Variations and degenerations and more or less demonic twists and rotations and falsifications. Later their history with more and more demonic stuff.
More timemline?
2036 mooving to Kenaʿan and Mizrayim, meeting with Mentuhotep II -> 430 a
Jīzchāq 2011 born
2006 weaned, Hagār und Yischmāʿēʾl sent away -> 400 a
1874 Yaʿaqōb flees to the Uncle
1867 marriages 1 and 2 of 4
1867/1866 Reʾūbēn
Gad and ʾĀschēr as Sebulūn and Dīnāh twins
1860 Yōsēph
1844 return
1821 moove to Mitzrayim -> 215 a
1686 Moschēh born
1694-1685 Sobekhotep IV Cha-Nefer-Re Sobekhotep IV
1646 Flight to Midejān from Meri-kau-Re Sobekhotep VII um 1646-1644 BC, the 7th-10tb after Sobekhotep IV.
1607 return after the death of Djed-hotep-Re Dedumose I?, pleas to Djed-nefer-Re Dedumose II (Timaios), 1st plague August/September
1606 7. plague January/February,
9. plague March Chamsin or Vulkan, 10. plague March/April -> 40 a 11. plague Dedumose II and his Army die at the End of the 13. Dynastie, 12. plague Hyqsos
1605 errection of the Tent of Encounter or get-together -> 600 a
1567 -> 300 a
1566-1560 conquest of the Holy Land
1546 Kūshān-Rishathajim
1267-1249 Yāʾīr
1227-1221 Yipthach
1095-1056 Shāʾūl
1056-1016 Dāwīd
1016-976 Shelōmōh
1012-1005 templeconstruction. 480 a + 114 a of evil rulers befor and after the Juges
976 Rechabʿām 1Kg 12 ->390 a
975- Jarabʿam bēn Nebat
722 Yissrāʾēl deported
606 Dānīʾēl deported
597 Yechēzqʾēl deported
586 Yerūschālajim destroyed, 3rd deportation Yehūdāh's
582 4th deportation
538 beginning of the return
445 Neh 1 -> 69×7a×360 d until Palmsonnday
arround ẞukkoth 2 Yēschūaʿ born
arround Chanukāh 3 magicians from Pars-a
arround February 1 Hērōdēs the Great died
CANGE OF THE TIMES
Pēssach 11 Yēschūaʿ in the Templarea
End 28 Yōchānān the Baptist
January 29 baptism of the Lord
Pēßach 32 Golgatha
1Kö 3,1 Pa-seba-chai-en-niut-meri-Amun Psusennes I arround 1040-arround 994
14,25 Shishak 971 Scheschonq-meri-Amun-netjer-heqa-Iunu "Sjsk"/? 946 to 924 Much to early.
2Kö 17,4 Soʾ is Sheshonq VI 727-715?
Pianchi/Pije/Meriamunpianchi Men-cheper-Re 746-716 BC???
MeriAmun Osorkon IV Aa-cheper-Re-setep-en-Amun 732/730-715/713 BC???
18,21 Schebitko/Scha ba ta ka Djed-kau-Re 716-707/706
Jer 24,30 Hes 29,2 Wah-ib-Re/Haa-ib-Re/Chophraʿ 10. February iulianic 589-570
30,32 at the further invasions in Bāb-ilani. This was his end.
Where can I find this information about African Y chromosomes possibly mutating faster? Also, why haven’t mainstream scientists considered (or have they) that the DNA of Neanderthals is too degraded to use for a comparison?
The mutation rate hasn't been measured yet is what he was saying. It should be easy enough if you get a decent population of moderately related males from different tribes and villages. This would give you the mutation rates from father to sons, but you would need to get a large sample size across different geographic areas to determine which population has a slow or fast mutation rate when compared to Europe and Asia. Mutation rate varies depending on a lot of factors, I would also hypothesize that epigenetics also participate in the mutation rates and because of the nomadic, hard struggle for survival a lot of people groups in Africa contend with, also puts genetic pressures on genetic adaptability.
There is no such information because it is a silly idea. Why would mutation rates differ between continents? And the idea of degradation was pulled out of nowhere.
@@jockyoung4491they would differ, most likely due to environmental factors. Things like temperature and diet can switch "on" or "off" certain genes. That would be a simplistic and not all encapsulating example.
@@rabidrooster6525
That has nothing to do with the mutation rate. The mutation rate measures the neutral base-pair point mutations thar are fairly constant background error rates. But we don't have to rely on African data, since we have modern humans in Asia dating back over 40,000 years.
I am sorry people are answering you that do know actually know the answer. So here you go…
First the two studies that evo’s use to get their old dates from. They basically come from two published studies which explicitly attempt to obtain the pedigree-based per-generation mutation rate for the Y chromosome (Helgason et al. 2015; Xue et al. 2009). Both studies use low coverage sequencing scanning and only found a few mutations. Thus; they believed y chr Adam lived long ago.
Later came Poznik et al. (2016) who compared low coverage versus high coverage sequences in 143 individuals. They discovered that missing DNA variants are found throughout the Y chromosome tree.
They decided to do more studies using high coverage sequencing scanning on the Y chromosome and guess what? these variants are found in nearly all samples! Meaning they missed them in earlier pedigree studies.
Since the total number of mutations between fathers and sons is already low/is already a rare event, a discovery of even 10 additional mutations via high coverage sequencing could have a dramatic impact on the per-generation mutation rate-and the creation/ evolution debate.
To date, two high coverage Y chromosome sequencing studies have been published in which pedigree-based mutation rate data are available (Karmin et al. 2015; Maretty et al. 2017). Both studies filtered their sequencing data via versions of previously published filters. Meaning, they obtained YEC results but filtered that out by combining it with older slower mutation rates to get evolutionary results.
Maretty et al. (2017) published a Y chromosome tree based on the sequence differences found on the XDG region of their male participants. Karmin et al. (2015) utilized a variety of filters, one of which (“filter c”) was explicitly based on the filters utilized by Wei et al. (2013) and Poznik et al. (2013).
Basically jeanson found in these studies that an average of three mutations per generation are handed down in the Y chromosome. This means when we’re looking at people today who have a total of 446 mutations then it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that only about 150 generations ago Y-chromosome Adam lived which makes him Noah.
Good presentation. Makes sense too
I really enjoyed the presentation, but there is a bit at the beginning about the evolutionist viewpoint of man's ancestors being "Not, capable, advanced, or intelligent."
From everything I have seen, evolutionists do not claim this. Instead they claim that human ancestors were making stone tools more than 3 million years before modern humans were on the scene, and that stone technology radically improved over that time, but modern humans perfected it before the agricultural revolution changed everything.
@brockgeorge6437:
There's more at the end of the sentence you're commenting about. You should listen to the passage again.
I love jeanson.
My Dad’s parents had 10 kids, that turned into over 60 grandchildren, which turned into over 85 great grandchildren.
My mom had 11 children, and lots of grandchildren and great grandchildren. That was commonplace for many in past generations.
God help us all....
I was just reading Genesis 25 in my devotional. Two verses stood out to me
25 And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau.
27 And the boys grew: and Esau was a cunning hunter, a man of the field; and Jacob [was] a plain man, dwelling in tents.
So Esau was a hairy man who dwelled in the fields as a hunter. This to me sounds exactly like the Neanderthal cave dwelling hunter society as portrayed in history books. Could it be that Esau/Edom was those that are now identified as Neanderthalers?
Interesting thanks.
It is also interesting you use a pic of a person trying to light a fire with friction.
-
What inspired the first person, to rub two sticks together for so long they ignited? It's not as if it is a natural thing to do is it?
(Then the intelligence to see it's value. So they weren't dumb. Just didn't know.)
Then the advances of making it easier using very dry items. Yeah, my knowledge is lacking. I just hit my gas lighter ignitor ands away it goes. But you should get the idea.
-
What humanity had was curiosity. What stopped curiosity were those societies who had kings or emperors who were the offspring of Gods. Only they could be inspired by the divine. Not the plebs on the streets below.
And just plain lack of knowledge about everything. And the time to look and learn.
Thank you
Love this new series ❤ saw a video attempting to debunk your findings. Anyway you can explain the difference between mutations and fixation please? This difference was used to try to discredit your findings.
Mutations are what lead to fixation. Meaning, let’s say you live in a tribe with 10 people. The next generation there’s a new mutation. It wouldn’t take very long for that mutation to be in every single person of that tribe after a few generations. The larger, the population, the harder it is for a mutation to reach fixation. This is why we find an explosion of New haplogroups early on, and mostly in the Middle East exactly where we would expect to find this explosion after the tower of babel.
So the critics try and say that because most studies focus on the mutation rate, and not a substitution rate (which is how fast a mutation reaches fixation), then jeanson must be wrong. But this is ridiculous, because many of these studies state that the substitution rate is about the same as the mutation rate. As a matter fact, Parsons who ran the two largest pedigree studies ever said that the substitution rate shows mtdna Eve lived 6,500 years ago and a year later did another pedigree study to double check these findings with someone name Holland. The results were exactly the same. It is his mutation rate that is used by the FBI so it is highly accurate.
The critics have run out of argument. At this point all they can try and do now is invoke that selection was higher in the past, and it is today and that’s probably why there’s a difference. Rescue device after rescue device with these people it never ends.
@@YoungEarthCreation
No, mutations are fixed in small populations by genetic drift (random events), not more mutations. Having the exact same mutation again is extremely unlikely.
@@YoungEarthCreation oh ok I get it. When analyzing the genetics of a certain population, if a group of people all have the same mutation, then obviously that mutation has reached fixation. Thank you, thank you thank you for caring your cross through the narrow gate for us. 😉❤️
@@URBLuvd exactly right! And if we look let’s say at a population of islanders and they all have the same mutation, that means they are more
Genetically related to one another than a group that does not. That means they share the same haplogroup. It’s just another name for a Mutation that has reached fixation in a population. It also means if we test people around the world and find a group With that same Mutation somewhere else, it means they must have sailed and migrated off the island at some time in the past and colonized. So mutations make a great way to track people and also determine when an event happened based on mutation / substitution rates.
Everyday they say here in Australia that Aboriginal people were here 50,000 yrs.
But boy would you get on TV here and put this on the table.
The Australian aborigines supposedly have been in Australia 65,000 - 80,000 years
God bless you AIG 🙂🙏✝️
You could add the Biblical fact that the first few generations off the Ark had extremely long life spans. If my lifespan is 3-5 times longer than today's norm, it stands to reason that the generational mutation rate should be 3-5 times greater. Sons born near the end of my life might have more mutations than the ones born near the start of my life. They would look like descendants of their brothers, would they not?
@@ji8044nailed it.. that is still mysterious.. the life span was even lower than what we are today.. otherwise the rate of growth would have been too high..
@@ji8044at's absolutely untrue. Some sumarian kings were said to have ruled for well over a hundred years. Of course the secular world rules this out as mythology automatically though. Sumer IS the biblical 'shinar' the sumarian king En merker was likely the biblical nimrod and ruled for well over 400 years. En merker also means great Hunter. As was nimrod. En merker was also building a tower when the languages got confused by the angry got 'enki'. This is all written in stone tablets. Enmerker aka nimrod was the grandfather of gilgamesh, who also lived for a very long time and had a rule of over a hundred years. The epic of Gilgamesh also contains the noahic flood story with striking similarity. Sumar was the cradle of civilisation even in the secular world and its that fits the biblical narrative p3rfectly because it was also exactly were the first cities were build after the flood. these long lifespans dropped drastically though as can be seen in the biblical patriarchs. And not ,any generations after this would have loved very long. Sumarian history as stated on tablets even mentions kings before the flood, yes thats right the sumarians documented the global flood.
How wonderfully stupid and ignorant you are.
Did you get your biology degree from Answers in Genesis, that trusted science academy?
"long lifespan"? From Greek mythology. Also Adam, Eve, Flood from Greek Mythology
@@owenduck We rule it out as mythology because there's not a shred of evidence supporting these stories to be factual (people living for hundreds of years).
But here's the real trouble with your mental gymnastics and presuppositionalism.
If you take an ancient story to be factually true, then you can't but take them all for true.
And hence, you should also accept truth in all creation (and other) myths once written across the globe by all civilizations that ever lived.
Since that is preposterous, we stick to real evidence, archeology, etcetera.
The Lord created all living things through evolution
I stoped at the time factors of man kind I’m a biblical creationist about 6000 years
If you refuse to even listen to alternative arguments, then how do you know you are right?
I believe in the bible and don’t intend to change my mind or listen to someone trying to change my mind my belief s are older than me I accept the bible as true
Yes the bible give me the information that God created the earth and mankind this for me is true as I believe in the bible . I live by faith in the word to doubt is to deny the truth written within it.
@@barriesmith3489amen
Can you put all of these videos onto one video? I would buy it.
So did Native Americans, Australian Aborigines, Polynesian people, Vikings, etc. all travel to Egypt during the famine of Joseph. Or had people not yet spread across the planet until after Joseph’s famine?
People spread across the Old World over 40,000 years ago, and into the New World between 10-20,000
Australian Aboriginals didn’t travel anywhere.
They’ve lived in what we now call Australia in relative isolation for more than 60k years.
They did not travel to Egypt.
You need to take into account survival of those kids. And/or how many wives? As most/many wives and kids, died. At a guess because that is all I have, triple or more, may be required.
Remember even as close as our grandparents the death of wives in birth was significant. Grandfather on my fathers side had three wives all two died. And I'm not sure if the third had children. That question popped up just now.
To add to the confusion. Most uncles and my father had 4 kids. One uncle had 14, a few sets of twins. While the only aunty had none.
Everything comes full circle 360 =9 universal # half 180 =9 half circle. ❤❤❤ 369 Rev7-17 and Isaiah 22-22 One like a thief in the night. I am
Actual mitochondrial DNA dating using real DNA samples from families like the Russian Romanoff family, the mutation age converges at approximately 6000 years ago. What are the odds?
Are you contending that persons from Europe, sub-Saharan Africa, the Far East, southern Asia, southeast Asia, Australia, and the Americas went to Egypt for food during the 7-year famine described in Genesis?
If you add the supernatural it is no longer science or logical
Dr. Jeanson Thank you for your dedication in to this research. Mind blowing to say the least. I have 2 items that other researchers have done. One is L.A. Marzulli looking into elongated skulls and there DNA. The other is Dave Paulides, looking at big foot. Both have tested DNA and found only the DNA from the women side. The father's side unknown.
Nothing changes "everything". It's all about details.
Excellent
So once again I need to point out some problems. First this is being told by an apologist that has not published this information to any scientific journals.
If you don’t publish to scientific journals, no one can point out that you correct or wrong in your hypothesis.
So another problem is that birth rates where higher when we had no contraception. At the same time death rates were extremely high because there was no modern medicine. Most children died in infancy and few people lived to be 20 or older.
There are many other issues, but I can’t write a paper every time AiG puts out a video.
Last I will say if you truly believe in God and Jesus. Then even when you look outside of AiG it should only affirm and strengthen your faith. Sky ~ Your friendly Atheist.
I'm sure anyone else who has the means to check this will do so. Peoples faith in scientists are waiting since there is evidence of studies getting bought out for an agenda.
I'm don't doubt there were times and locations that made it hard for the survival of babies, but I doubt it was as ubiquitous as some say.
People have lost trust in journals and the peer review process - and rightly so.
@@hypnopompicstate9910
Only because they don't like what they say. I'd trust a peer-reviewed scientific expert over a Christian apologist. Obviously
Most people have no clue how hard it is to have a paper viewed by scientific peers and proven. Just imagine all of the years in which people dedicated their time, money, and resources were wasted.
I don't think “birth rates” would be, at all, a factor. On the other hand, If “death rates were extremely high” and “there was no modern medicine,” is problematic for the evolutionist because how do we expect Neanderthals to survive for 200,000 years with “death rates were extremely high” and without any knowledge of medicine?
Also, if “Most children died in infancy” the region in which earlier Neanderthals communalized would have shown signs of “evidence” of transitional ape-to-man fossils.
@@jockyoung4491 Enjoy being in the dark about scientific issues. Just keep looking for those missing links that aren't there while real scientists follow the science to where it leads them unencumbered by evolutionist dogma.
Populations advance when energy becomes concentrated, especially the types of energy that are beneficial to humans. One early way to do this is with planting crops. The crops capture energy from the sun, use that energy the gather resources from the earth, the produce the yield. Then human harvest the product of that energy. Something similar can be said with live stock. The great change that started with the industrial revolution was one: the concentration of human productive effort into increasingly larger cities, and the various forms of steam power. As energy becomes more abundant and accessible the population can increase more easily. It's not a factor of evolution. It's a factor of energy and it applies to nearly all life. Once the energy source is remove, whether it be crops, livestock, or later forms of energy production, the population will rapidly decline.
Thank you for sharing. :)
Dr. Jeanson and audience, please read Immanuel Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision. It is not anti-Christian. It was open on Einstein's desk when he died in 1955. Please read it because it touches on the worldwide famine and deliverance of Moses and his followers. Please read it. Great research. Great explanation of everything.
👍
After Noah's flood, the continents separated. If everyone got off the boat in Turkey, how did people end up in North and South America? Please and thank you
Most likely from the Siberian and Alaskan gap.
The land bridge during the ice age, boats, different sea levels ext.
They moved
They walked.
The continents separated millions of years ago.
What two lines of Noah are you finding? It makes a difference from the biblical account of curse's and blessings that night Noah gave to his son's. Shem and Japheth were to spend some time living in the tents while Ham departed from them right away. Is it possible that one of the lines is actually two that converged before Japheth moved his group further North and started dealing with the colder climates?
Ron Wyatt in his pursuit of Noah's Ark led to the discovery of the where the Ark came to rest and where Noah is to believed to have settled. He was led by locals to large stones that had carvings in the stones, which depicted 8 characters that represent that story. This idea your pushing sounds fowl to me. I believe Ron Wyatt gives a compelling explanation and you should watch his video.
Here, you dropped this: 🧠
@@--..-...-..-.--.... You're mistaken, that's yours.
God bless you 🙏
Great information but I wish you people would give the flat earth theory and serious look. I can show anyone exactly how the Bible describes the shape and nature of the earth. I can Biblically show you the reason that the shape and nature of the earth has been hidden. The Bible is a flat earth book from cover to cover and until you open your eyes to at least explore it, I do not believe that you can continue to make the claim that you see the Scriptures honestly and believe them.
You do realize that not everyone interprets scripture the same, right?
Just because one Christian or a group of them does not share your view or interpretation of scripture it does not mean that they do not believe the Bible or are not Christians.
For example:
Many Christians believe that eventually even after Death & Judgement, that everyone will be saved through and by Jesus Christ.
On the other side...
There many Christians that believe that those who have rejected Jesus while on Earth will spend an eternity being tormented in the Lake of Fire.
I have also met Christians that reject Young Earth Models and instead believe Day = Age models, therefore they believe that the Earth is Millions, Billions (whatever) of years old.
There are Christians who claim that unless you talk in tongues that you do not have the Holy Spirit within you and therefore you are not a true Christian.
Christians, regardless of what they believe read from the same book (Bible) and believe that book! What they believe that book teaches is another discussion altogether.
Simply stated:
Answers in Genesis may not believe that the Bible teaches a flat Earth or even a Geo-Centric model of our Solar System.
Most if not all RUclips channels will only share and teach about views that they embrace as true.
I hope this puts things in perspective.
I almost fell for flat earth. Then I met someone who took their own airplane AROUND the world on their own. Hard to believe something that isn’t when something that is, well, is.
Do note that not all parts of the Bible are speaking literally, some are also figurative. Also, basic reasoning can defeat many physics-related arguments for FE. For example, the absence of gravity, with it being replaced by density and buoyancy.
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. If you push down on something, it'll push back. If it doesn't push back hard enough to stop you, you'll keep going down. If it does stop you, you stay still. Density of mass measured against the density of some other mass determines buoyancy. But what would cause the downward force, if density is how close together matter is, and buoyancy an effect of density and the aforementioned force together?
Well gravity, but it supposedly doesn't exist. Why? Because water doesn't stick to an orange like it sticks to the globe. But there's a problem with the orange experiment: It's done on the globe. If everything in the universe consisted of the orange and the water, the water would very slowly drift towards the orange.
And since it doesn't make sense for gravity not to exist, it does exist. And since it exists, a flat earth would be a very unstable shape, and it would collapse in on itself, forming a sphere.
Why would God make the laws of physics not fit one of His best creations, or vice versa?
anyway pointless rant (otherwise known as a waste of 15 minutes of my time) over
This is the definition of "blinding with science" ...and excellent
examples of subjective reasoning, probability bias and so many more flawed reason models. Wake up people
I have a question to Christians… do you believe God created the world in a literal 7 day week? All work done in 6 24 hour days, and rest on the last day. Do you believe this is how he did it?
This was a thought exercise, if you don’t believe God did it how he literally said he did, and trust the billions of years theory of science, how on earth do you believe anything in the bible! You already chose not trust the first book. You have been deceived.
I'll participate in this exercise.
Yes, I do believe God created the world in 6 literal days (dark/light, evening/morning cycles) I don't know if they were exactly 24 hours, but probably close, give or take.
To those who disbelieve in Creation Week, I present the 4th Commandment which God wrote on a rock WITH HIS FINGER!!!
“Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.
Six days you shall labor and do all your work,
but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God. In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates.
For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.
God is the one true God...so If the one just and Holy God said He did it in six literal days....He did it in six literal days....otherwise we can say that He is not God and He cannot create in a fashion that suits His glory
To me your argument is pointless. It doesn't matter. I wasn't around when God created everything visible and invisible. No one was. What's recorded in the biblical account says what it says. Life goes on. My faith is secure in Jesus Christ. I guess I'm blessed with not having the need for God to be proven to me on a purely intellectual level. He revealed Himself to me and I believe Him. I hope and pray for those who don't have the experience of meeting God.
@@winniecash1654 How is his argument pointless when his argument is if you don't take the first book literally how can you believe the rest of the Bible? That is not a pointless argument that is a well founded question about our beliefs as Christians! It makes total sense that if you don't believe the first book how can you believe the rest of the Bible, this is confusing to you?
@@timsgta for me it doesn't affect my faith. It might for some people. I see it as a need to know issue. The Bible doesn't say something about everything. It's also not a scientific book. Does it mention science? Yes. Is it solely written as a book on science? No. Does it mention history? Yes. Is it a book written specifically for history? No. Does it mention sociology? Yes. Etc. Hopefully you see the pattern. Do I believe Genesis? Yes. But if it was 7 literal 24 hour days or epochs of time, it doesn't matter to me. Could that really matter to some people? Yes. But I don't have an issue with it, as I already mentioned. If anyone is really all that interested in my perspective, it more or less goes along with that of the late Michael Heiser. His books and yt videos are many, and there are few things he talks about that I disagree with.
If Adam and Eve visited with God every day, isn't it more possible that their knowledge was more advanced than ours? Also, isn't it possible that when the fallen angels were living with men, that they imparted knowledge and the civilization was more advanced than we are now? And, we have progressed and declined in knowledge since that time as sickness, weather and wars have destroyed civilizations over time?
Yes. We are devolving and have been for many thousands of years.
************Studying and learning from science is amazing. TRUE science is OF God. But we must realize there will always be things we don't understand. Set our spiritual and educational foundation of the Rock of God********
12 And now, my sons, remember, remember that it is upon THE ROCK OF OUR REDEEMER, WHO IS CHRIST, the Son of God, that ye must build your foundation; that when the devil shall send forth his mighty winds, yea, his shafts in the whirlwind, yea, when all his hail and his mighty storm shall beat upon you, it shall have no power over you to drag you down to the gulf of misery and endless wo, because of the rock upon which ye are built, which is a sure foundation, a foundation whereon if men build they cannot fall.
The first man talking is making no sense. When you take away The Word Of God you end up with a hot mess.
God gave us the ability of our rational mind as well as free will so that we could truly understand and be in awe at what he did to allow the universe to exist and bring it to order.
The Bible does say little about the pre-Noahic Flood peoples other than to recount genealogies, craftsmanship and cities built. Also, the environmental issues, like higher air pressures, higher oxygen levels and mist from the ground instead of rain are lightly touched upon. The Bible also states that the thoughts of man before the Flood ...like today...were evil continuously. What we do know from the building of the Ark is that man at that time was very smart. They had the benefit of institutional memory from individuals that in some instances lived for almost 1000 years. So in the 1600 to 2000 yrs before the flood man could have made tremendous accomplishments as have been accomplished by post flood man in the last 4400 years. It would be interesting to get a better picture of how pre-flood humans lived. Out of Place artifacts found in coal seams and items dug up when digging wells attest to early man's skills. The Ark Encounter has a hall addressing this.
💯 based on all of those details plus fallen angels interacting with and teaching humans, it’s likely that pre-Flood man had what we would consider to be post-modern technology
@@terranceramirez4816
And, according to the Bible, if we all spoke one language there would be a structure, made of bricks and slim, well above what modern architecture has achieved, just a tad over a half mile.
@@elmercoblentz9432 and Babylon has been conquered several times over since then so I’m sure that structure has suffered immense damage and is no longer standing as such
@@terranceramirez4816 the structure was built as a ziggurat and yes its base is where the Bible says it was in Babylon.
Excellent video
Comedy gold
Doctor, what resources do you have regarding Hindu / Indian (India) peoples origins? Thank you
Genesis 6 introduces The Triple Helix....fallen angels with human women.
How can spirits (no body) have relations with humans?
@@giak7525 Why do you assume angels had no bodies? Angels (fallen and unfallen) CAN assume bodily form. Scripture tells us that they ate, interacted with, and looked like regular people. Otherwise, the men of Sodom wouldn't have wanted at them so badly.
Sons of God were Seth’s descendants, daughters of men were descendants of Cain….resulting offspring were hybrids…with Hybrid vigour…
@@GS-nw9dm then why not say the sons of Seth went into the daughter's of men?
@@Ezekiel38Matthew24 because they were the Sons of God….they followed God…up until this point when they started to backslide
I like your comment about people advancing then going primitive. We have fairly recent examples of what could have happened to conquered peoples. After WWI Germany and Japan were in shambles. We could have left them that way, or made them even worse then at the end of the war, and their cultures would have regressed considerably. However, we "Allied" powers chose to help rebuild them, so they therefore did not regress.
I'm the thumbs down. You do realize that the stories in your bible are found in even older stories. Humans have always enjoyed story telling. Your "new discoveries" will forever occupy the minds of a small audience. Best wishes.
Correction: you are _one_ of the thumbs down.
It's frightening how they incorporate some of the scientific data and twist it into propaganda almost effortlessly, and I wouldn't say they have a large audience but all these people in the comments are their victims and it saddens me deeply
You present some awesome facts and when you start mixing in "only" the christians beliefs the facts begin to fade into the background 😐✌️❣️
Curious how the Septuagenarian dates would effect your conclusions
Please explain. What do you mean by Septuagenarian dates ? Thanks.
@@NilodeRoock the age of the earth being closer to 7500 vs 6000
@@MichaelCarper2 And you get that from the "Septuagenarian dates"? - Please define these dates.
@@NilodeRoock Genesis 5 and Genesis 11 genealogies were cut short in the Masoretic
@@MichaelCarper2 You practice judaism then??? - You are being mysterious. Please apply 2 Timothy 3:16.
I have been working through these videos. Very fascinating stuff. WHY do you call your faith an apology?
Make sure you deny everything prior to 6,000 years ago. That would include rejecting any method that dates anything prior to 6,000 years ago. That includes all the methods and knowledge described in this video.
It's nice the way creationists like Jeanson ignore 99.9% of the scientific evidence which disproves their YEC claims and demand we only consider the 0.1% they cherry picked.
Machu Pichu is actually very recent, around 1450, only few decades before spanish arrive in the new world. Fantastic work though professor Jeanson.